THINK-ISRAEL |
HOME | September-October 2007 Featured Stories | Background Information | News On The Web |
TWO WEEKS AGO, Judge Simon Cardon de Lichtbuer of the Brussels civil court ruled[1] that he lacked authority to overturn a decision by the city's mayor, Freddy Thielemans, to ban a demonstration planned for September 11 under the slogan of 'Stop the Islamization of Europe.' The rally had been called to protest what its British, Danish and German organizers call the "creeping" Islamization of European society.
Provocative in their assertion of Islam's incompatibility with democracy, the rally organizers nonetheless would have been violating no known law. Yet Thielemans (who had approved a September 9 rally by a group of conspiracy theorists who claim that the September 11 attacks were orchestrated by the Bush administration) neither liked them nor the possibility of a violent reaction from what he termed "Muslims," "peace activists" and "democrats."
This is but the latest manifestation of a disturbing European malaise--preemptive cringe before the threat of violence from Muslim extremists. It is no secret that Muslim extremists in Europe are very much likely to offer violence in response to conduct deemed hostile to Islam. Three key examples:
February 2006: The owner of the magazine France-Soir,
fired[5] his editor, Jacques Lefranc, for republishing the
Danish cartoons.
Add to this the news[8] this year that an English vicar has advocated abolishing St George as England's patron saint in deference to Muslim opinion; that the Blackpool city council threatened to rescind licenses from taxi drivers for flying Union Jacks during last year's World Cup soccer tournament; that a history course on the Holocaust has been dropped by at least one British school in deference to their Muslim students learning a very different lesson in their homes and mosques (variously--denial, minimization, justification); and it is clear that the specter of violence has had its effect.
Undoubtedly, the reactions to these events are not uniform: publications in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain also re-ran the Danish cartoons to register their support for free speech; the German interior minister defended the Pope's remarks; and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, some of her ministers, and the Berlin mayor criticized Deutsche Oper's decision to drop the Idomeneo production. But it isn't at all clear that Europeans appreciate the implicit long-term threat to their liberties stemming from a growing population of Muslim supremacists.
Footnotes
1. http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2424
2. http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1951292005
3. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4281958.stm
4. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/04/ngeorge04.xml
5. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4672642.stm
6. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CEFD81F31F934A1575AC0A9609C8B63
7. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article38153.ece
8. http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/nwilliams_20070724.html
This article appeared September 21 2007 in the Weekly Standard
Daniel Mandel is director of the Zionist Organization's Center for
Middle East Policy, a fellow in History at Melbourne University and
author of H.V. Evatt & the Creation of Israel: The Undercover
Zionist (2004).
(www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/
132hqeaa.asp?pg=2?ZoomFont=YES).
HOME | September-October 2007 Featured Stories | Background Information | News On The Web |