... ...... Think-Israel

 
 
HOME Featured Stories January 2007 Blog-Eds List Background Information News On the Web
 
 
THINK-ISRAEL BLOG-EDS
Opinions And Editorials By Our Readers


NAILING THE JEW IDIOTS...
Posted by Gerald A. Honigman, January 31, 2007.
This is called :Essay Linking Liberal Jews and Anti-Semitism Sparks a Furor" and it was written by Patricia Cohen. It appeared today in the New York Times.

The American Jewish Committee, an ardent defender of Israel, is known for speaking out against anti-Semitism, but this conservative advocacy group has recently stirred up a bitter and emotional debate with a new target: liberal Jews.

An essay the committee features on its Web site, ajc.org, titled "...Progressive' Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism," says a number of Jews, through their speaking and writing, are feeding a rise in virulent anti-Semitism by questioning whether Israel should even exist.

In an introduction to the essay, David A. Harris, the executive director of the committee, writes, "Perhaps the most surprising -- and distressing -- feature of this new trend is the very public participation of some Jews in the verbal onslaught against Zionism and the Jewish State." Those who oppose Israel's basic right to exist, he continues, "whether Jew or gentile, must be confronted."

The essay comes at a time of high anxiety among many Jews, who are seeing not only a surge in attacks from familiar antagonists, but also gloves-off condemnations of Israel from onetime allies and respected figures, like former President Jimmy Carter, who titled his new book on the Mideast "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid." By spotlighting the touchy issue of whether Jews are contributing to anti-Semitism, both admirers and detractors of the essay agree that it aggravates an already heated dispute over where legitimate criticism of Israel and its defenders ends and anti-Semitic statements begin.

The essay, written by Alvin H. Rosenfeld, an English professor and the director of the Institute for Jewish Culture and the Arts at Indiana University in Bloomington, castigates a number of people by name, including the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Tony Kushner, the historian Tony Judt, the poet Adrienne Rich and the Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen, in addition to a number of academics.

Mr. Judt, whose views on Israel and the American Jewish lobby have frequently drawn fire, is chastised for what Mr. Rosenfeld calls "a series of increasingly bitter articles" that have "called Israel everything from arrogant, aggressive, anachronistic, and infantile to dysfunctional, immoral, and a primary cause of present-day anti-Semitism."

A historian at New York University, Mr. Judt said in a telephone interview that he believed the real purpose of outspoken denunciations of him and others was to stifle harsh criticism of Israel. "The link between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism is newly created," he said, adding that he fears "the two will have become so conflated in the minds of the world" that references to anti-Semitism and the Holocaust will come to be seen as "just a political defense of Israeli policy."

The essay also takes to task "Wrestling With Zion: Progressive Jewish-American Responses to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict" (Grove Press), a 2003 collection of essays edited by Mr. Kushner and Alisa Solomon. Mr. Kushner said that he and Ms. Solomon took great care to include a wide range of voices in their collection, including those of Ms. Rich, the playwright Arthur Miller and various rabbis.

"Most Jews like me find this a very painful subject," Mr. Kushner said, and are aware of the rise in vicious anti-Semitism around the world but feel "it's morally incumbent upon us to articulate questions and reservations."

Over the telephone, the dinner table and the Internet, people who follow Jewish issues have been buzzing over Mr. Rosenfeld's article. Alan Wolfe, a political scientist and the director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life at Boston College, said, "I'm almost in a state of shock" at the verbal assaults directed at liberal Jews.

On H-Antisemitism (h-net.org), an Internet forum for scholarly discussions of the subject, Michael Posluns, a political scientist at the University of Toronto, wrote, "Sad and misbegotten missives of the sort below make me wonder if it is not the purpose of mainstream Jewish organizations to foster anti-Jewishness by calling down all who take from their Jewish experience and Jewish thought a different ethos and different ways of being as feeding anti-Semitism."

Others have praised Mr. Rosenfeld's indictment and joined the fray. Shulamit Reinharz, a sociologist who is also the wife of Jehuda Reinharz, the president of Brandeis University, wrote in a column for The Jewish Advocate in Boston: "Most would say that they are simply anti-Zionists, not anti-Semites. But I disagree, because in a world where there is only one Jewish state, to oppose it vehemently is to endanger Jews."

Although many of the responses to the essay have referred to its subject as "Jewish anti-Semitism," Mr. Rosenfeld said in a telephone interview that he was very careful not to use that phrase. But whatever it is called, he said, "I wanted to show that in an age when anti-Semitism is resurgent, Jews thinking the way they're thinking is feeding into a very nasty cause."

In his essay he says that "one of the most distressing features of the new anti-Semitism" is "the participation of Jews alongside it." Like others, Mr. Cohen of The Washington Post complained that the essay cherry-picked quotations. "He mischaracterized what I wrote," he said. "I've been critical of Israel at times, but I've always been a defender of Israel." He did add, however, that a wide range of writers were named, some of whom have written inflammatory words about Israel. "He has me in a very strange neighborhood," Mr. Cohen said.

The dispute goes beyond the familiar family squabbling among Jews that is characterized by the old joke about two Jews having three opinions on a single subject. Bitter debates over anti-Israel statements and anti-Semitism have entangled government officials, academics, opinion-makers and others over the past year, particularly since fervent supporters and tough critics of Israel can be found on the right and the left.

Mr. Wolfe, who has written about a recent rise in what he calls "Jewish illiberalism," traces the heated language to increasing opposition to the Iraq war and President Bush's policy in the Middle East, which he said had spurred liberal Jews to become more outspoken about Israel.

"Events in the world have sharpened a sense of what's at stake," he said. "Israel is more isolated than ever," causing American Jewish defenders of Israel to become more aggressive.

On this point Mr. Rosenfeld and Mr. Wolfe are in agreement. "It's going up a notch or four or five," Mr. Rosenfeld said in an interview. "One of the things that is clear," he said of anti-Semitic and anti-Israel attacks, "is that what used to be on the margin and not very serious is becoming more and more mainstream."

Mr. Rosenfeld, who has written and edited more than half a dozen books as well as other publications for the committee, emphasized that policy disagreements were natural and expected. Opposing Israel's settlement of the West Bank or treatment of Palestinians "is, in itself, not anti-Semitic," he writes; it is questioning Israel's right to exist that crosses the line.

But Mr. Judt said, "I don't know anyone in a respectable range of opinion who thinks Israel shouldn't exist." (Mr. Judt advocates a binational state that is not exclusively Jewish, something that many Jews see as equivalent to dissolving Israel). He contends that harsh complaints about Israel's treatment of Palestinians are the real target.

Last year Mr. Judt came to the defense of two prominent political scientists, Stephen M. Walt at Harvard and John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, after they were besieged for publishing a paper that baldly stated (among other things) that anyone critical of Israel or the American Jewish lobby "stands a good chance of being labeled an anti-Semite."

David Singer, the committee's director of research, said the attention Mr. Rosenfeld's essay had drawn was not unexpected. "We certainly thought that it would raise eyebrows in some quarters," he said.

"I think it's an act of courage" on the part of the American Jewish Committee and the author, he added. "It obviously deals with matters of great sensitivity."

Gerald A. Honigman, a Florida educator, has created and conducted counter-Arab propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has publicly debated Arab spokesmen. His articles and op-eds have been published in both the print media and on websites. Contact him at honigman6@msn.com or go to his website: http://geraldahonigman.com/blog.php

To Go To Top

THE DEMONIC CONVERGENCE: RADICAL ISLAMIC GROUPS WORK TOGETHER
Posted by Michael Travis, January 31, 2007.

This was posted by Baron Bodissey January 25, 2007 on the Infidel Bloggers Alliance
(http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2007/01/demonic-convergence.html). The original article contains live links to additional information.

I've written previously about the organization called Al-ikhwan al-Muslimeen, also known as the Muslim Brotherhood. Established in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna, its goal is to return Islam to its roots in the Koran and the Hadith, purify Muslim practices, and re-establish Islamic governance under the Caliphate.

The Muslim Brotherhood was (and is) a Sunni organization, but that doesn't stop it from working with other branches of Islam that share a common goal of defeating the infidel and overthrowing secular governments.

And now, according to The Politics of CP, there seems to be a link between the Ikhwan and the Sufi terrorist Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani, founder of the Muslims of America and Jamaat ul-Fuqra. CP, as the premier online investigator of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, has discovered the apparent connections:

Ikhwanul Muslimun is, in fact, listed in the IRS online database

This was posted by Baron Bodissey on the Infidel Bloggers Allianceof "Charities & Non-Profits". The organization is also listed on two websites listing presumably charitable organizations accepting car donations [here and here]. Interestingly, the address for Ikhwanul Muslimun corresponds to that of the Muslim Parochial School near Hancock [here and here].

Records listing contact names for both Ikhwanul Muslimun and the Muslim Parochial School were then matched to the address of Islamberg, the headquarters compound of Muslims of the Americas (MOA). Incidentally, another "charity", which isn't listed with the IRS, called Hand-to-Hands Inc. is also based at Islamberg. It purports to be the "humanitarian and social welfare arm" of the MOA. International Quranic Open University is yet another arm of the group based in Hancock. MOA, which owns possibly two-dozen settlements like the one in NY throughout the US and claims several thousand members, is the primary front organization for a Pakistan-based Islamist militant group known as Jamaat ul-Fuqra.

MOA has a long history in Brooklyn. An address history search for the individual connected with Ikhwanul Muslimun showed links to addresses in Hancock, Deposit, and Brooklyn, NY among other locales. Another search linked the principal of the Muslim Parochial School to both Brooklyn, NY and Williamsport, PA where an MOA group used to operate.

There are a lot of links to his original sources in CP's post; you'll want to go there to find them, and also to read the rest of his summary. While you're at it you can browse his archives, which contain the most extensive information about Jamaat ul-Fuqra available on the web.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Muslim Brotherhood is the ideological engine of modern Sunni Islam. It has codified the visceral anti-Western and anti-modern sentiments of the Muslim Middle East, giving its practitioners a well-developed intellectual base and a sophisticated methodology.

A connection between the Ikhwan and MOA comes as no great surprise. There is ample evidence that Hizbullah -- which is Shiite -- is coordinating its efforts with various Sunni groups, including Al Qaeda. Why not extend the cooperative sphere to include Sufi terrorists? All of them share the common goal of exterminating the kuffar and establishing a worldwide Islamic government.

The Demonic Convergence which has formed in the last few decades is seizing the opportunity posed by Western decadence, weakness, and self-loathing. Sayyid Qutb, the great populizer of the Muslim Brotherhood, wrote in his 1963 book Milestones (Ma'alim fi al-Tariq):

The leadership of mankind by Western man is now on the decline, not because Western culture has become poor materially or because its economic and military power has become weak. The period of the Western system has come to an end primarily because it is deprived of those life-giving values, which enabled it to be the leader of mankind.

It is necessary for the new leadership to preserve and develop the material fruits of the creative genius of Europe, and also to provide mankind with such high ideals and values as have so far remained undiscovered by mankind, and which will also acquaint humanity with a way of life which is harmonious with human nature, which is positive and constructive, and which is practicable. Islam is the only System which possesses these values and this way of life.

More than forty years ago the premise was made clear: The period of the Western system has come to an end primarily because it is deprived of those life-giving values, which enabled it to be the leader of mankind.

To complete the Demonic Convergence, all that is necessary is the passive -- or even active -- assistance of the Left within Western countries. The doctrinaire Socialists, Marxists, Anarchists, and Deconstructionists are only too happy to comply, ready to assist with their own suicide.

Fjordman has pointed out the natural synergy that has arisen between the Left and the Islamists:

[T]he fascination with Islamic movements... is partly based on hatred of the West and a belief that the world must be "liberated" from Western civilization, which is the cause of global injustice.

City on FireCan there be a more poignant manifestation of this trend than Denmark's "City on Fire" project, which visualizes with great longing the incineration of Western Civilization? The useful idiots of our own culture are supplying the fuel while radical Islam provides the oxygen for the great conflagration.

The match may already have been put to the tinder. According to Daniel Pipes:

Significant elements in several Western countries - especially the United States, Great Britain, and Israel - believe their own governments to be repositories of evil, and see terrorism as just punishment for past sins.

The various "purifiers" of Islam are well aware of our weaknesses; they show an uncanny ability to get into our culture and borrow what is useful in order to destroy it. Actual weaponry -- the IED, surface-to-air missiles, nuclear weapons, etc. -- are part of the plan, but so are political and cultural strategies. The Islamists appropriate our organizational methods, utilize a party system, and borrow freely from Marxist, Green, and Multiculturalist rhetoric to use against us.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is notably effective in all these activities. I have quoted previously from their website:

The work of Hizb ut-Tahrir is to carry the Islamic da'wah in order to change the situation of the corrupt society so that it is transformed into an Islamic society. It aims to do this by firstly changing the society's existing thoughts to Islamic thoughts so that such thoughts become the public opinion among the people, who are then driven to implement and act upon them. Secondly the Party works to change the emotions in the society until they become Islamic emotions that accept only that which pleases Allah (swt) and rebel against and detest anything which angers Allah (swt). Finally, the Party works to change the relationships in the society until they become Islamic relationships which proceed in accordance with the laws and solutions of Islam.

That particular Hizb ut-Tahrir website is no longer available -- authorities keep taking down the site, and the group keeps moving it. The current site for the UK Chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir is fairly innocuous as Islamist websites go, which is probably why it's still extant. Britain is one of the few countries where Hizb ut-Tahrir is still legal.

But don't be fooled by the mild taqiyyah versions of the group's ideology. When you drill down to their non-PR sites, that's where you can find the real red meat. Their latest incarnation seems to be here, where it is clearly stated that Hizb ut-Tahrir is "a political party whose ideology is Islam". According to their "About Hizb-ut-Tahrir" page:

"...Hizb-ut-Tahrir must be a political party that undertakes

This was posted by Baron Bodissey on the Infidel Bloggers Alliancewithin the Ummah this task [Islamic governance] and works towards seizing the reins of power through her; thus Hizb-ut-Tahrir is not a spiritual bloc, nor is it a moralistic or a scientific bloc, but rather a political bloc that works towards the management of the Ummah's affairs as a whole according to Islam."

It's not a spiritual bloc; it's a political bloc.

Its ideology is Islam.

Its intention is to wage jihad until the goal of a worldwide Islamic government is reached.

When the Islamists' goal is achieved, there will be plenty of time to sort out the Sunni-Shiite-Sufi issues. Lots of time to line up the "false Muslims" against the wall and give them the justice of the bullet. Bloodshed in the name of the Prophet can continue indefinitely, even after all the infidels are gone, until Islam is really, really, 100% pure.

In the meantime, the Demonic Convergence is upon us. Radical Islamic groups are working together, sharing information and manpower, planning and executing strategies against the kuffar. The talking heads and PR firms lie and obfuscate, but if you look beneath the surface you can find their goals clearly stated, the agenda laid out for all to see.

And the useful idiots are lining up, falling over each other in their eagerness to abase themselves before the Legions of the Prophet.

Islam, as it is presently practiced by the majority of devout Muslims, is a political ideology. It is about power, about taking it from the infidel and entrusting it to the vanguard of the true believers.

Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler are the role models. The Party's purpose is to realize the revolution, enforce discipline, and instruct the people. It requires absolute dedication, absolute ruthlessness, and allows no compromises except for temporary and expedient ones.

Say good-bye to the Worldwide Socialist Revolution. Say hello to the Worldwide Caliphate.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

DON'T THEY REALLY WANT A ONE-STATE SOLUTION?
Posted by Dr. Steve Carol, January 31, 2007.

Again and again one hears and reads ("A Rabbinic Response to President Carter,"Jewish News, Jan. 12, 2007) the often repeated mantra that the (emphasis added) solution to the ongoing 135+ year Arab-Muslim war against the Jewish people in the Land of Israel is a "two-state solution." U.S. policy for a generation has stressed an Israeli and Palestinian Arab state "living side-by-side in peace and security." Would that be the case. Yes, it is a goal of the current Israeli government, the same government that unilaterally retreated from Gaza and for its trouble has received constant rocket bombardment and terrorist threat from that territory. Simply put a "two-state" solution can only occur if both (emphasis added) parties genuinely want that.

This conveniently forgets the historic fact that since 1921 there has been two states formed out of the original British Mandate of Palestine which was to be the Jewish National homeland. The larger of these, 35,468 sq. miles (out of 46.339 sq. miles) - some 77% of the original British Mandate, is now called "Jordan" -- a state artificially created by Winston Churchill in late March 1921. Churchill would boast "I created Trans-Jordan [now Jordan] with the stroke of a pen on a Sunday afternoon in Cairo." At first, Emir (later King) Abdullah I, wanted to call his kingdom "Palestine" but the British discouraged him of that idea stating that the name "Palestine" smacked of imperialism. Some 80% of Jordan's population is Palestinian Arab.

The remaining 23% of the original mandate became the re-established State of Israel and after open Arab aggression, three regions came under Arab occupation: Gaza, under Egyptian military control, and Judea and Samaria, what the Arabs would soon name "West Bank," unilaterally annexed by Trans-Jordan.

Thus, more precisely, the present day calls for a "two state" solution actually mean a "three state" solution. The Palestinian Arabs will have TWO states, Jordan and the yet to be declared "Arab state of Palestine." But is that the final real intention of the Arab-Muslim side in the conflict?

Since its formation in May 1964, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in its covenant has called for a "one-state solution" -- a "Falastin" from "min al nahr ila al-bahr" (from the [Jordan] river to the [Mediterranean] sea). Such a state would encompass present day Israel, Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip. It would mean no more Israel. There is strong evidence to support the contention that such a Palestinian Arab state would also encompass Jordan. The events of September 1970 -- "Black September" -- and the subsequent Jordanian civil war came close to a PLO victory over the Hashemite monarchy of King Hussein. The Hamas Charter echoes this desire for a one-state solution, as do the official pronouncements from Hezbollah, Al Fatah, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa Brigades. They all aspire to eliminate Israel, but they choose different tactics to get the desired result.

Furthermore all Palestinian Arab groups demand as a sine qua non, "haq al-auda" (the right of return). In this manner the Jewish state would be demographically overrun by anyone claiming to be a "Palestinian Arab," ensuring the destruction of the Jewish state.

It is long overdue that talk of a "two state" solution be exposed for what it really is. Two states, one Jewish, the other Arab already exist within the boundaries of the original British Mandate. To promote a "three state" solution for two peoples, especially when the Arabs already have 21 sovereign states in existence, is folly.

Now, there is serious talk of allowing the Israeli Arabs, many of whom consider themselves "Palestinian" Arabs, to have their own autonomy or perhaps join a new Palestinian state. Thus there would be a "three-and-a-half state" solution, with the half being the rump of an ever-shrinking Jewish state. The Arabs have long demanded a return to the June 4, 1967 lines, with calls by some already publicly demanding a return to the 1947 U.N. Partition plan borders. Given a three and a half state solution, Israel would be reduced to the 1937 Peel Commission partition recommendation -- a nation 120 miles long and between 38 and 9 miles wide.

In their eagerness to promote and force a "two state" solution to the conflict, the United States, the European Union, the Israeli left, and many other nations are not going to achieve peace. Rather they guarantee more war as the Arabs -- the Palestinian Authority and its PLO components, Hamas, Hezbollah, and their Arab-Muslim supporters continue their drive -- militarily, politically, economically, and diplomatically -- to achieve their true goal -- a "final solution" -- a one state solution with Israel eradicated from the map!

Dr. Steve Carol is Prof. of History (retired), Official Historian "Middle East Radio Forum" (www.middleeastradioforum.org). He lives in Scottsdale, Arizona. Contact him at drhistory@cox.net

This article was submitted January 16, 2007

To Go To Top

THE PEACEFUL MAJORITY
Posted by Naomi Ragen, January 31, 2007.

All I can say about the article below is wow. I don't know how old it is, or if it's been published anywhere, but the author's e-mail address is listed under his name if you wish to contact him and find out. To me, it is a timeless piece of wisdom.

Mr. Haynes, you are a wise man in a world of fools.

I used to know a man whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War Two. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.

"Very few people were true Nazis "he said," but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories."

We are told again and again by "experts" and "talking heads" that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace.

Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.

It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard quantifiable fact is that the "peaceful majority" is the "silent majority" and it is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia comprised Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

The average Japanese individual prior to World War 2 was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And, who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were "peace loving"?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points:

Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.

Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

As for us who watch it all unfold; we must pay attention to the only group that counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Lastly, I wish to add: I sincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without paying heed to it, or sending it on, is part of the problem. Lets quit laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against terror. They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the world and it's citizens. Best we support them.

William Haynes
bill2space@cox.net

Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and journalist who lives in Jerusalem. She can be contacted at www.naomiragen.com, where you can subscribe to her newsletter.

To Go To Top

A NEW PARADIGM
Posted by Moshe Dann, January 31, 2007.

Without a practical and specific alternative agenda all of our analyses and insights are irrelevant.

The "New Paradigm for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict" is a suggestion. based on the work of Prof Martin Sherman (TAU). It is presented in the hope that people will use and disseminate it, and/or critique it and perhaps suggest even better proposals.

This proposal strikes at the heart of the problem -- the so-called "Palestinian refugees" and the "two-state solution" that is intended to destroy Israel.

This article appeared in Arutz-7 and is archived at
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=6885

Thanks,
Moshe Dann

Attempts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by political solutions involving the establishment of a second Palestinian entity in Judea, Samaria and Gaza (Yesha) have not only failed, they have encouraged terrorism and violence, especially within Palestinian society. An alternative to the "two-state solution," therefore, is essential to achieve peace.

Palestinians are unwilling and incapable of achieving and maintaining statehood.

Palestinian Unwillingness

The Palestinians have rejected every viable proposal that would have afforded them a state -- from the 1947 partition plan to the 2000 proposals by Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

Palestinian Incapability

The Palestinian national movement has enjoyed conditions far more favorable than almost any other national independence movement since World War II: widespread international endorsement of their cause; unmitigated and generous support from the United Nations, the European Union and world superpowers; highly sympathetic coverage by all major media organizations; and over a decade of Israeli administrations who have acknowledged (and at times even identified with) the national aspirations of the Palestinians.

In spite of this, the Palestinian national movement has been unable to go beyond terrorism and Jew-hatred. No other national independence movement has brought such failure, privation and penury to its people and disappointment to its supporters.

Paradigm Shift

The reason for these failures is that Palestinian nationalism is driven less by lack of Palestinian self-determination and more by the very the existence of Jewish self-determination; less by the aspiration to establish a Palestinian state and more by the aspiration to destroy a Jewish state.

Rejecting the right of Jewish self determination and attempting to destroy Israel is unacceptable by any international standards and, thus, must be considered illegitimate.

In order to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, therefore, the establishment of a Palestinian State must be removed from the international agenda. The humanitarian predicament of Palestinians residing in Israeli-administered areas must be resolved in humanitarian, not political, terms.

The Humanitarian Paradigm must replace the Political Paradigm. This can only be done if the current Palestinian narrative, which fuels the Political Paradigm is delegitimized. The delegitimization of the Palestinian narrative is a vital prerequisite to any comprehensive resolution of the Palestinian issue. Proposal

A comprehensive humanitarian solution to the Palestinian issue entails three major elements:

1. The dissolution of UNRWA. This is an essential prerequisite for any comprehensive, durable solution of the Palestinian issue. UNRWA exists solely to assist Palestinian "refugees," while all other refugees in the world are dealt with by the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). Only UNRWA offers "refugee" status to all Palestinians and their descendants.

This results in a constantly increasing number of "Palestinian refugees"; whereas, in other cases, the number of refugees declines over time. In fact, if the UNHCR's otherwise universal definition were applied to the Palestinian case, the number of refugees would decline from 4-5 million to a few hundred thousand (at most); i.e., by over 90%.

UNWRA is perpetuating the very problem it should have eliminated.

2. The dissolution of UNWRA will end the ethnic discrimination of Palestinians as refugees, most of whom have been living in the Arab countries without rights. They must be allowed to become citizens of the countries in which they now reside or in another Arab country of their choice.

3. Generous relocation and resettlement grants will be offered to Palestinians living in Israeli administered territories on an individual basis, and not via corrupt and terrorist-based official Palestinian organizations. The remaining -- and drastically reduced -- numbers of Palestinian refugees should be placed under the auspices of UNHCR, in accordance with the accepted practice for all other refugee groups.

This will: a) extricate them from their humanitarian plight; b) free them from the yoke of generations of misrule by their leadership; and c) ensure the survival of Israel as the nation-state of the Jews.

A survey conducted among the Palestinians in Nov. 2004 indicates that only about 15% of the Palestinian population resident in Israeli-administered areas would reject such an offer. By contrast, over 70% would accept some form of material compensation as an inducement to emigrate permanently from the areas currently under Israeli administration.

The economic cost of such a policy of humanitarian relocation and resettlement would be far less expensive than any other proposal. It would also eliminate dependence on terrorist groups.

The proposed initiative is a "win-win" initiative that will:

* alleviate, and even eliminate, the humanitarian plight of individual Palestinians;

* ensure the continued security and survival of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people;

* provide a significant boost to the economies of the developing world; and

* transform poverty-stricken refugees into affluent emigres.

Moshe Dann is a writer and journalist living in Jerusalem. He can be reached at moshedan@netvision.net.il

To Go To Top

DEMAND THEIR IMMEDIATE SAFE RETURN!
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 31, 2007.

This is on Doris Wise Montrose's website (http://www.cjhsa.org)

now missing for over five months after being abducted by Hamas and Hezbollah, were the primary cause for Israel to take action in Lebanon, and the release of these soldiers still remains a tenet of the UN negotiated ceasefire. This fact seems to have been forgotten by the media and those who continue to work against the best interests of Israel and subvert the policy of the United States and the Middle East. The debate has now degenerated into a prisoner exchange program, which was not part of the wording in UN Resolution 1701, no matter how one might try and read between the lines.

The agony of the families of these kidnapped Israeli soldiers is extreme. They have not heard a word regarding the fate of their loved ones, who are being held captive for political ransom.

It is crucial that you join us on a full-scale advocacy effort to help bring about an end to the inhumanity of captivity and to call for the release of all Israeli MIAs and POWs.

SOLDIER BACKGROUNDS

Ehud (Udi) Goldwasser (Age 31)

Udi was born in Nahariya, and is the son of Miki and Shlomo and older brother of Yair (26) and Gadi (23). After dating for nine years, he and his wife Karnit were married last year.

Udi completed his undergraduate studies at the Technion (Israel Institute of Technology) and is currently a graduate student in environmental engineering. Udi is a kind, loving and caring person, always ready to offer a helping hand in any situation. He is a man of principles and values, is knowledgeable about many subjects and is an avid photographer.

On Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Udi was abducted and taken to Lebanon after Hezbollah attacked his military patrol.

Eldad Regev (Age 26)

Eldad was born and raised in Kiryat Motzkin. He is the son of Tova (of blessed memory) and Zvi, and brother of Benny, Ofer and Eyal. After completing three years of military service in the elite Givati infantry brigade, he became a law student at Bar Ilan University with the hopes of becoming a law professor. Eldad is loved by and immensely popular among all who know him. He readily offers aid to anyone in need.

Eldad was called up for military reserve duty after completing his exams at Bar Ilan University. Three days before his abduction, he visited his family and participated in the annual memorial for his mother. The following day, he returned to complete the remainder of his reserve duty.

On Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Eldad was abducted and taken to Lebanon after Hezbollah attacked his military patrol.

Gilad Shalit (Age 20)

Gilad was born in Nahariya but was raised in Mitzpe Hilla in the Western Galilee. He is the son of Aviva and Noam and brother of Yoel (23) and Hadas (16). He follows sports teams and tournaments all over the world, from tennis to basketball and cycling. Gilad is a well-mannered, quiet and soft-spoken young man, with a smile that lights up his face.

Gilad began his military service a little over a year ago in July 2005. He followed his older brother Yoel into the armed forces and despite being able to avoid combat due to medical reasons, he preferred to serve in a combat unit. Prior to his abduction, he had been on duty guarding the settlements around Gaza.

Since the attack at Kerem Shalom on Sunday, June 25, 2006, Gilad has been held in the Gaza Strip by Hamas.

Soldier Backgrounds provided courtesy of Jewish Community Federation of Cleveland

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com or visit her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

TO END THE PALESTINIAN SHOW, STOP PAYING FOR TICKETS
Posted by Obadiah Shoher, January 31, 2007.

This was written by a veteran politician who writes under the pen name of Obadiah Shoher. He can be read on the Samson Blinded blogsite.

TO End The Palestinian Show, Stop Paying For Tickets
http://samsonblinded.org/blog/index.php?s=polarization

Hamas-Fatah polarization is artificial. Their struggle is about the donors' money: which group would embezzle it and whether the funds will pay salaries of Fatah or Hamas militias. In the Palestinian Gold Rush, Hamas relies on popular opinion and rogue Muslim regimes, while the locally discredited Fatah clings to Israel and the West for paternal protection. Hamas tenders to Muslim dreams with anti-Israeli slogans, while Fatah caters to Western dreams with pro-Israeli declarations. When addressing fellow Muslims, Fatah is stringently anti-Israeli just like Hamas. Prostituting Abbas is ready to put his tongue and pen on Israeli TV and the peace treaty, respectively, to remain in charge of the billions of dollars of aid. He stands tall and ready to fight Hamas to death for the aid money.

The best generic prescription in any war is attritting your enemy. That includes economic attrition and fully applies to the Arab enemy. "To stop the civil bloodshed in Palestine," Israel must end her payments to the PLO, and do her utmost to stop and intercept the foreign payments.

With rockets, RPGs, mortars, grenades, and machine guns, Palestinian warriors killed only about three dozens of each other. A formidable enemy, indeed.


http://samsonblinded.org/blog/index.php?s=populism+entrenched

Populism is entrenched in the Israeli Finance Ministry. 700 shekels ($164) proposed subsidy to families with three children and two working parents is ludicrous. Such families are the apogee of morality: the parents, hard-working and poor (with meager $1,000 income) still brought up three Jewish children (ugly, the subsidy also benefits Muslim families). They deserve much more from the state.

The Finance Ministry is wrong to push women to work. Jewish mothers are more important to Israeli society than semi-skilled workers. Jewish tradition takes precedence over political correctness, socialism, and feminism.

Foreign Minister Tzippi Livni sounded hopeful in Davos: Palestinian state in Judea "is achievable." A horrible idea of surrendering the core Jewish land is the goal of Israeli Foreign Minister. Livni said that she "voted to uproot Israelis [in Gaza] in order to give peace a chance." Not for a certain peace, not for the peace she was sure of, not based on the rational analysis: just to give a chance, to gamble with the lives of 10,000 Jews in Gaza. Shimon Peres, for his part, amused the serious crowd at the Davos Forum with a comic plan of Jewish economic cooperation with Palestinians, uneducated and lacking the work ethics. Or was he serious? On background of the mad Israelis, Abbas was refreshingly sensible at Davos. He demanded return of six million descendants of the 1948 Arab refugees to Israel -- not to the Palestinian entity, and required Israeli citizenship for Arabs of Judea and Samaria while incorporating their lands in his state.

How could the Knesset discuss the impeachment when the president is yet to go to trial? He is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Knesset members want to usurp the judicial prerogative and prejudice the court decision. Lawlessness is so typical of Israel.

It wasn't enough for the Israeli leftists to have Arabs on their election roll, to bring Arabs into the Knesset. Kadima-Labor alliance launched an Arab MK into the government to become a minister. Crucially, a minister. He has no assignment yet, not qualified to do anything, and needed for nothing. That's just a show of brotherly -- or brothel-ly -- fraternity between leftist Jews and Arabs. If you're honest, make Arab a Defense Minister. A Chief of Staff. A Mossad director. Pack and go back to Russian ghettos.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

LATEST PHOTOS FROM THE JOLLY ASHOURA FESTIVAL
Posted by Michael Travis, January 31, 2007.

This is from the Atlas Shrugs website
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/ atlas_shrugs/2007/01/religion_of_pea.html)

Religion of Peace thru Barbarism

It's that time again. Ashoura "Festival." Remember last year? Goto
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/ atlas_shrugs/2006/02/muslim_cartoons.html I expect this to be all the rage in Hollywood shortly, cutting in a big way -- Insane Fonda, Penn, Sarandon -- this is one rally they ought to be leading.

Ashoura2007.
The blood stains are seen on the back of an Afghan Shiite Muslim flagellating himself with knives during the Muharram procession in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Pakistani Shiite Muslim beats himself with chains to mourn the

This was posted by Baron Bodissey on the Infidel Bloggers Alliancedeath of his spiritual leader Imam Hussein, grandson of Prophet Mohammad in Lahore.


Afghan Shiite Muslim flagellate themselves with knives during the muharram procession in Kabul, Afghanistan.

"Muslims Across Islamic World Take Part in Ashoura Festival" from January 29, 2007 FOX New.

AP Jan. 29: Iraqi children beat themselves with chains during Muharram, an important period of mourning for Muslims.

Muslims across the Islamic world took part Monday in the religious festival of Ashoura, marked by fasting and bloody mourning rituals for the death of Prophet Mohammad's grandson Imam Hussein.

Speaking at a mosque in the capital, Afghan President Hamid Karzai spoke of the significance of Ashoura: "This day teaches us about resistance and to fight for our rights, even if we are weak and not armed with weapons."

Ashoura, or 10th day of the lunar month of Muharram, is marked by Muslims as a whole with a day of fasting that commemorates the day Noah left the Ark, and the day that Moses was saved from the Egyptians by God.

UPDATE: Maternity wards or bomb factorys? Don't forget the babies --
http://faustasblog.com/2007/01/it-takes-more-than-village.html -- don't ever forget the child abuse

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

IS FM TZIPI LIVNI STILL A MOSSAD OPERATIVE?
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 31, 2007.

The London Sunday Times of January 28th speaks about the probability of Israel's PM Ehud Olmert, being ousted -- with Tzipi Livni replacing him. However, the Times points out that there are some problems beginning to surface about Livni. While the Times speak of her as a former Mossad agent, most people know that (like the Mafia) once you are an Intelligence operative, you are always on call by that institution. (1) Having an active Intelligence operative as Prime Minister reporting or taking orders from their original Intelligence Organization may make little difference to the average citizen.

For example, Vladimir Putin was a high KGB officer and presumably remains connected to whatever the KGB has morphed into now that he is President of Russia. That might not be probable in America, where citizens expect their elected officials to be advised by Intelligence Agencies but, NOT to be agents themselves.

Israelis are beginning to take a harder look at their Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni as she moves to the front and speaks like a confirmed Leftist and a supporter of the failed Oslo Accords. She was a confidante of then PM Ariel (Arik) Sharon, who seemed to be nurturing her political advancement. Presumably, Sharon knew about her Intelligence background but he would have not necessarily known if she was still active and reporting.

If Livni was and remained an active Mossad agent, being groomed for a higher position in government, who else would she have been reporting to? Certainly to the Mossad Director and likely to Shimon Peres, given the tilt of Israeli Intelligence toward the political Left. It must be remembered that the Mossad and the Shin Bet (Secret Services) were once the most admired and non-political organizations. That all changed -- mostly around the time when Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres politicized those institutions by appointing directors who would task field operatives to work against Rabin's political opposition on the Right. It is hard to forget the use of Avishai Raviv, code named "Champagne", employed by Rabin through Shabak to instigate operations against the political Right.

Planting a mole in the Likud party at the time would have had considerable benefits to the Israel's Labor Left. For example, Oslo would never have happened had either the Mossad or Shabak lifted the cover on the Rabin, Peres, Beilin secret negotiations with Yassir Arafat in Norway. They were just too good as Intelligence Institutions NOT to know what these top Israeli officials were doing in Oslo. Presumably, they are now well-informed about the attempt at secret deals being made in Davos, Switzerland where Livni, Peres and Abbas shared their plans for two states west of the Jordan River. In any case, the trade-craft of Intelligence Agents would not allow them to admit being an agent, if asked.

The question arises: Was Tzipi Livni, supposedly a former Mossad agent deliberately put on the government ladder of advancement as a mole, serving both the Mossad and the Oslo cabal?

Sometimes discovering a mole is like locating what is called a "Black Hole" in the sky. You cannot actually see the "Black Hole" but know it is there by watching the nearby objects being moved around by the sheer gravitational power of the "Black Hole". Oslo, for example, was something like a "Black Hole" until it was pushed in view and became a fait accompli. However, that "Black Hole" continued to exert its power on national policy.

We have observed Livni make common cause with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of the U.S. State Department. Somehow Livni has become an exceedingly satisfying Foreign Minister, serving the interests of Rice, which follows the "Black Hole" scenario demonstrating the control of other objects.

We see Livni at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, well out of the closet, so to speak, as she joins Peres, Javier Solana, Sec. Gen. of the E.U. and Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen) making the creation of another State of Palestine her top priority, as she says. There are several stages: Pre-Oslo in the early 1980s, Oslo in its failed state in the 1990s, the resurrection of Oslo August 2005 -- starting with the uprooting of Jews from Gush Katif in Gaza and now the push-through Judea and Samaria = All One State.

We have watched the political Left step-by-step misuse their power of office to politicize the Israeli Military, her Courts and her Intelligence Agencies to keep the Oslo Doctrine moving forward. Israel was not supposed to adopt the ways of nations who controlled their populations by having a politicized Military, Police, Courts and Secret Services who plant moles in the opposition. Israel was supposed to be a nation of laws, votes by her citizens on vital issues and NOT controlled by her elected officials under the cover of being a democratic dictatorship.

If Livni was merely a Mossad agent being nurtured for a high insider position then clearly, she is not worthy of the job nor to be trusted. A Prime Minister is supposed to be objective and to represent all the people. I know that's naive but, some dreams must be kept!

I have previously speculated that Ehud Olmert would be forced to resign with someone else like Livni or Peres to be the backup, running the country with the doctrine of "territorial divestment". It looks like this is well advanced.

At that time I was unaware of Livni's background as a Mossad agent. It makes more sense now in terms of advancing control of the nation with a mix of the Left and Intelligence at the top. Can the Knesset pull itself together and deeply probe Livni's background and her assigned mission to reach the political top?

How did this woman work her way inside Sharon's inner circle, unless Sharon wanted her there? Presumable Tzipi Livni never left the Mossad and was tasked to work inside the government at the highest level possible. It is well-known that minimally, since the days of Rabin and Peres, every effort was made to put figures who were loyal to the Leftist Labor/Meretz Party in charge of the Intelligence Agencies or P.C. (Politically Correct).

The same was true of Labor's effort to control the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) by nurturing P.C.s soldiers like Rabin, Ehud Barak and Dan Halutz, etc. If Livni remained a Mossad or Shabak operative, it would explain her considerable efforts to manipulate the plan first initiated by Rabin and Peres with Oslo and now carried forward by Olmert, Livni and Peres to relinquish Judea and Samaria to the Arab Muslim Palestinians, according to the Bush-Baker-Rice "Road Map" plan.

Why would Livni, as an Israeli Intelligence agent, want to subvert the safety and sovereignty of the Jewish State of Israel? It's a puzzling question but, could be answered with an intense investigation by an independent committee of known honest, non-political jurists - if they exist!

Back-tracking a little further, one would likely find the Saudi royal family and the Washington/Texas oil families in cahoots to move Israel out of the way. Clearly, the more control the Arabists in Washington had within the Israeli government, the easier to manipulate Israeli policy. Recruiting agents in other nations can be accomplished by money, blackmail (threatening to expose misdeeds) or simply appealing to their known ideology which conveniently matches the goals of their foreign recruiter.

The disinformation line is: "The Muslim Islamists would cease their march toward their Global Caliphate under 'Sharia' (strict Islamic) law, if Israel were removed as an irritant to the Jihadis (holy warriors for Islam)". Of course that is illogical but, we underlings aren't supposed to notice. It's their way of eliminating us infidels (non-Muslims): "first the Saturday people and then the Sunday people." Islam is off any leash these planners may have held.

Even if they could succeed in subverting Israel to the benefit of the Saudis and the Arab Muslim, nothing will stop their war with the Free West. But, because they lack the necessary courage to face down Global Islamic Terror, they continue with the Israeli plan, trying to look pro-active and positive. The propaganda story pushed by the Arab Muslims and carried forward by "friendlies" in Washington, the E.U. and the U.N. is that IF the Arab Muslim Palestinians were given a state, Iran and Syrian Islamists would cease attacking the Free West.

Clearly, this is all very speculative but, as is said:"Where there's smoke, there's fire".

However, it would pay to look into Tzipi Livni's background as it relates to her current mission and the Israelis who have adopted the pacification of the Palestinians as the solution to reach the Arab Muslim world. Livni's linkage to Shimon Peres, C. Rice and Javier Solana, Sec. Gen. Of the EU -- in their plan to divest Israel of Judea and Samaria is worth exploring.

But, if Livni remains an agent, then the "Operation Divestment" has been in motion for a long time -- at least since the early 1980s when Rabin and Peres colluded with Yassir Arafat to de-Judaize Judea and Samaria. Given Sharon's early move to abandon Gush Katif/Gaza and Northern Samaria, and Olmert's pledge to do the same with Judea and Samaria, this is then well-advanced and Livni would have many roles to play -- particularly now as that of a stand-in for Olmert if he is indicted for any of the various scandals of which he is being accused.

In any case, someone would have to rush the next stage of Jewish Land Divestment through the Knesset, making a "provisional" second state of Palestine which is intended to replace the 250,000 Jewish men, women and children living in Judea and Samaria.

The Arab Muslim world also demands that the Jews surrender what the Arabs call east Jerusalem so the Palestinians can claim a capitol of a nation that never existed. (Note! Arab Muslim propaganda describes East Jerusalem as all the areas in Jerusalem once illegally controlled by Jordan for 19 years, including Ramat Eshkol, French Hill, Gilo, the Temple Mount and Har Zeitim, the Mount of Olives ancient Jewish cemetery and more.)

IF, G-d forbid, Israel ever agrees to this heartless surrender, it will necessitate uprooting another 250,000 Jewish men, women and children from their homes in Jerusalem. If you thought it was difficult and bad for the country to evict 10,000 Jewish men, women and children from Gush Katif/Gaza plus the 4 Jewish communities in Northern Samaria, you cannot begin to imagine the self-destruction of tearing 500,000 Jews out of their homes in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to give that land to hostile Arab Muslims.

Rice is aiming to get Fatah and Hamas to stop killing each other and vent their rage on Israel -- called the "occupier" -- with the weapons supplied to Fatah. Despite the obvious danger and the example of how the Palestinian Authority used donor money in the past, Israel, under pressure from C. Rice just gave $100 Million dollars to Abu Mazen to strengthen Fatah. In addition, the U.S. gave Abu Mazen $86 million American tax-payers' dollars.

Rice has to avoid giving offense to Syria by attacking them for supplying Hebz'Allah with weapons to take down the Lebanese government. Rice must force Israel to give up the Golan Heights to Syria on the off chance they will cease funneling terrorists into Iraq to kill American soldiers.

I believe was Albert Einstein who commented to the effect that man has the tendency to try the same failed experiment over and over, expecting new results. The Israeli Left repeatedly tried to appease the Muslim Arabs with a Jewish Land for Peace formula which not only failed repeatedly but tended to increase the Arab Muslims' expectations and rage for more when their hopes were not fulfilled. Failure never dampened their enthusiasm to repeat the same failed experiment -- namely changing the bedrock religious beliefs of Muslims for Islam, not Democracy. Land for Peace has proven to be a futile effort which is destined for failure and, tragically, Israel's self-destruction.

I wonder. Does Secretary of State C. Rice knows which side she is on anymore? Being a cat on a hot tin roof is hard work.

Footnotes

1. "General's Evidence Could Oust Olmert" by Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv, London Sunday Times, January 28, 2007

2. "Professor Aumann: Post-Zionism Greater Threat Than Nukes" Arutz-7 Jan. 28,2007 [Excerpts Prof. Aumann's speech delivered at the Herzliya Conference.]: "...our panicked longing for peace is working against us. It brings us farther away from peace, and endangers our very existence. ...Churchill said, 'If you want peace, prepare for war.'

"Roadmaps, capitulation, gestures, disengagements, convergences, deportations, and so forth do not bring peace. On the contrary, they bring war, just as we saw last summer. These things send a clear signal to our 'cousins' [the Arabs -ed.] that we are tired, that we no longer have spiritual strength... This only whets their appetites. It only encourages them ...not to give up on anything...Capitulations bring about war; determination and readiness bring about peace."

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

BERNARD LEWIS: MUSLIMS 'ABOUT TO TAKE OVER EUROPE'
Posted by David Machlis and Tovah Lazaroff, January 31, 2007.

Islam could soon be the dominant force in a Europe which, in the name of political correctness, has abdicated the battle for cultural and religious control, Prof. Bernard Lewis, the world-renowned Middle Eastern and Islamic scholar, said on Sunday.

The Muslims "seem to be about to take over Europe," Lewis said at a special briefing with the editorial staff of The Jerusalem Post. Asked what this meant for the continent's Jews, he responded, "The outlook for the Jewish communities of Europe is dim." Soon, he warned, the only pertinent question regarding Europe's future would be, "Will it be an Islamized Europe or Europeanized Islam?" The growing sway of Islam in Europe was of particular concern given the rising support within the Islamic world for extremist and terrorist movements, said Lewis.

Lewis, whose numerous books include the recent What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East, and The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, would set no timetable for this drastic shift in Europe, instead focusing on the process, which he said would be assisted by "immigration and democracy." Instead of fighting the threat, he elaborated, Europeans had given up.

"Europeans are losing their own loyalties and their own self-confidence," he said. "They have no respect for their own culture." Europeans had "surrendered" on every issue with regard to Islam in a mood of "self-abasement," "political correctness" and "multi-culturalism," said Lewis, who was born in London to middle-class Jewish parents but has long lived in the United States.

The threat of extremist Islam goes far beyond Europe, Lewis stressed, turning to the potential impact of Iran going nuclear under its current regime.

The Cold War philosophy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), which prevented the former Soviet Union and the United States from using the nuclear weapons they had targeted at each other, would not apply to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran, said Lewis.

"For him, Mutual Assured Destruction is not a deterrent, it is an inducement," said Lewis of Ahmadinejad. "We know already that they [Iran's ruling ayatollahs] do not give a damn about killing their own people in great numbers. We have seen it again and again. If they kill large numbers of their own people, they are doing them a favor. They are giving them a quick, free pass to heaven. I find all that very alarming," said Lewis.

Lewis acknowledged that Ahmadinejad had made the notion of Iran having the right to acquire a nuclear capability an issue of national pride, and that this should be borne in mind in trying to thwart Teheran's nuclear drive. "One should try to make it clear at all stages that the objection is not Iran having [a nuclear weapon] but to the regime that governs Iran having it," said Lewis.

This idea already had support among those Iranians who, on the one hand, believed that their country has a right to possess such a capability but, on the other, feared it being acquired by a government that they do not support.

Israel and the West should work to strengthen moderate forces within the Iranian population, he urged, via an aggressive propaganda campaign including the use of television and radio programs.

"All the evidence is that the regime is extremely unpopular with their own people," he said. "I am told that the Israeli daily [radio] program in Persian is widely listened to all over Iran with rapt attention." Israel and the West should also be looking to reach out to moderate forces within the Arab world, which are equally alarmed by the spread of extremism in their midst, said Lewis. "The Arab governments understand that Israel is not their biggest problem," said Lewis.

Contact Avodah at avodah15@aol.com

To Go To Top

THREE NEW VICTIMS OF OLSO STUPIDITY
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 31, 2007.

Emi Elmaliah and Michael Ben Sa'adon decided to open a small neighborhood bakery when they were released from the Israeli army. Young, married, with children, they had a modest dream, to make a living selling bread in a quiet residential neighborhood in Eilat. They and their only employee, Israel Zamalloa, a Jew from Peru, were murdered when a Palestinian peace partner of Ehud Olmert blew up their bakery. Naturally, the mother of the murderer was ecstatic that her son had died murdering Jewish civilians (see
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/mideastconflictisrael). The three victims became the latest victims of the Oslo "peace process".

A completely unexpected attack, the media are telling us. Who could have possibly known that such a killer could simply walk into Israel across its border with Egypt? How could anyone possibly have known it was so easier to walk across the border?

How indeed. Well, for one, 300 Sudanese knew, as did anyone in Israel who had read a newspaper or watched TV over the past few months. Sudanese refugees from Darfur who entered Egypt simply walked to the border with Israel and then walked across, entering Israel with not so much as a challenge by a border patrolman to show their papers. No doubt the Sudanese chose the wide-open Egyptian-Israel border because infiltrating Libya from Egypt can be a real problem you see, what with the guarded border THERE and all. The Israeli media have been filled with stories about those Sudanese, with public debates as to what to do with them. But after those news stories of the Sudanese simply walking into Israel across the undefended border with Egypt, it seems that the only people left in the entire country who were NOT aware that the border with Egypt was unsecured were Israel's Prime Minister, Defense Minister, and army chief of staff.

Who else knew of the unsecured porous border? Well, every drug smuggler in the country and every prostitute who entered Israel in the past few decades. The latter "working girls" are mostly Eastern Europeans who fly to Egypt and then stroll across the border to practice their "profession". The bomber of Eilat had exited the Gaza Strip into Sinai via one of those countless tunnels that Olmert is too cowardly to demolish because one would have to knock down a few houses of "Palestinians" to get at them. The murderer was driven down the Sinai to a nice place for a winter stroll into Israel.

SO after the atrocity in Eilat (the murderer, by the way, was actually trying to get to Haifa to blow himself up), all the politicians are whining about how expensive it would have been to secure the border with Egypt. You know, barbed wire and "nanny cameras" really cost... 2. Polls here are showing that more Israelis believe President Moshe Katsav about the charges of "rape" and hanky-panky being filed against him by the Prosecutor's Office than the number who believe the Prosecutor's charges. This, despite a year's long media campaign leaking stories about what President Katsav is supposed to have done.

Now Katsav is innocent until proven guilty and here is not the place to state my own subjective take on what he may have done. But the fact that more Israelis disbelieve the leftist Prosecutor's Offices than believe them might just have something to do with the naked leftist bias manifesting itself every day in the behavior of the Attorney General, including the prosecution for manslaughter of farmer Shay Dromi for defending his property from Arab thieves [Editor's note: they poisoned his dog and attempted to steal his sheep] and the long track record of indicting and jailing anti-Oslo protesters under a variety of charges, including teenage girls.

3. When the Texas Jihadniks tried to pull a Neve Gordon: Of course Texas has freedom of speech whereas Israel has a neofascist Left.

"Attempt to Silence Analysis of NGOs such as PCWF Rejected by Texas Judge,"
http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/ _court_dismisses_frivolous_case_against_ngo_monitor_
January 23, 2007

On January 17, 2007, a Texas Federal Court judge dismissed as "wholly frivolous" and "baseless" Palestine Children's Welfare Fund (PCWF) Riad ElSolh Hamad's defamation suit against NGO Monitor, Frontpage Jerusalem, the Center for Study of Popular Culture and others. Hamad charged the organizations had defamed him and violated his constitutional and civil rights linking him and his charity in newspaper and Internet articles to Islamic fundamentalist terror.

In addition to dismissing Hamad's claims as "groundless", United States District Court Judge, Sam Sparks, leveled Rule 11 sanctions against Hamad and ordered him to pay defendants' attorney's fees and costs totaling almost $60,000 as well as a $1000 fine to each defendant for Hamad's repeated violation of court orders.

NGO Monitor Executive Director Professor Gerald Steinberg noted: "This was a clear attempt to use the courts and intimidation to prevent independent analysis and exposure of the incitement by anti-Israel NGOs. This strategy has now been rejected."

In his ruling, the judge called Hamad's complaint "an unintelligible morass of vitriolic accusations" that had "no basis in law."

NGO Monitor analysis shows Gaza-based PCWF openly exploits children's issues for radical politicized agendas that promote the conflict. These activities are entirely inconsistent with its claims to be a humanitarian organization. Among PCWF's activities, documented in NGO Monitor's report, is a children's drawing contest. The judges rewarded, almost without exception, entries that featured fierce and violent hatred of Israel. The winning picture features a fire, in the shape of a map of Israel and the Palestinian Authority, consuming the Star of David with the word "Israel" written inside the flag. Another entry depicted a Palestinian flag dropping flames on an Israeli flag and burning Israelis standing next to it. Such activities serve only to advance a culture of violence and hatred.

The use of the courts in the attempt to prevent debate and the exposure of the highly politicized activity taking place under the guise of promoting human rights is widespread. The judge in this case rejected the effort to silence NGO Monitor's analyses of such activities.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

MEMO TO A USEFUL IDIOT
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 31, 2007.

This was written by Gil Troy and it appeared in the Canadian Jewish News
http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=11090. Gil Troy, Ph.D. is Professor of History at McGill University in Montreal. His latest book is Hillary Rodham Clinton: Polarizing First Lady.

Dear Shulamit Aloni,

In early January, you supported former U.S. president Jimmy Carter's inaccurate, inflammatory accusation that Israel is guilty of practising "apartheid." You must be pleased with yourself. Your article has been widely posted around the Internet. Googling "Shulamit Aloni" and "apartheid" generates 70,000 hits.

I am, however, appalled. Not only did you fail to make the case, but I challenge you to see how your article is being used. I do not believe that all critics of Israel are anti-Semites. Nor do all critics call for Israel's destruction. But I wonder how many anti-Semites -- how many people devoted to destroying Israel -- will post your article and lovingly quote your words before you take responsibility for fanning the flames of hatred against your people and the country you served as education minister.

You repeated the term apartheid nine times in your nearly 1,100-word article, yet only one paragraph discusses the term. Citing international law, you define apartheid "as an international crime that, among other things, includes using different legal instruments to rule over different racial groups, thus depriving people of their human rights." Having shown that Israeli soldiers disrupt Palestinian travel you ask: "Isn't freedom of travel one of these rights?"

That's the wrong question. The relevant question is whether the Israeli-Palestinian clash is a racial conflict and whether the State of Israel has imposed a systematic, racist South-African-type regime. You contradict your title when you say that "we, too, used very violent terror against foreign rule because we wanted our own state." If Palestinians are fighting "foreign rulers" then how is the apartheid label relevant? Apartheid, with its network of laws separating black citizens from whites, institutionalized white supremacy. Neither you nor Carter have justified that charge.

Unfortunately, this is more than a legalistic debate. By supporting Carter's term, you are advancing a growing worldwide campaign to delegitimize Zionism and expel Israel from among the community of nations, which is the correct punishment for an "apartheid" state. Your article -- and your career -- demonstrate many other eloquent ways to condemn Israeli policies without using an incorrect, destructive analogy.

If you doubt how the apartheid accusation is being used against Israel, I invite you to surf the web and meet your new allies.

When I appeared on the left-leaning American radio and television network Democracy Now to condemn Carter's use of the term, I received a wave of abusive anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic e-mails. Most critics blamed Israel exclusively for the entire Mideast mess, putting Israel's actions and "the Jews" at the centre of all the world's troubles.

I was told that the Jewish state should be in southern Germany, not on Palestinian land, that we Jews thought we were better than everyone, and that as a "Jewish New Yorker" I spoke "Yinglish" not English. Most critics triumphantly referenced your article or other similar articles from Israelis "proving" that Israel practises apartheid -- as if it's impossible for an Israeli to be wrong, too.

You are, of course, free to believe what you wish and write what you wish. That's your right. You live in a free county. But had you lived under South Africa's apartheid regime, you would have had to write such attacks from outside the country or from inside a jail cell.

My question then, is, what is your responsibility? When your words, consistently, are used by others to smear Israel, to delegitimize the state, to rationalize terrorism, and to peddle anti-Semitism, at what point do those actions implicate you?

The time has come for you to stand up and say, "Yes, my anger about the situation in the territories remains but, no, don't delegimitize my state, don't libel my people, and don't use my heartfelt words to advance your despicable agenda." You and many of your comrades on the Israeli left seem to have forgotten that in the Internet age, your words resonate, making you foot soldiers in the "electronic intifadah" that seeks Israel's destruction. I challenge you and your buddies to take responsibility for the anti-Semitic effects of some of your rhetoric. You cannot deny your impact.

The old saw falsely attributed to Lenin still holds -- you don't have to recognize that you're a "useful idiot" to be one.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

ISLAM AND THE MOLESTATION OF LITTLE GIRLS
Posted by Michael Travis, January 31, 2007.

Our friend Jaco has posted another uncomfortable weather report on
http://cuanas.blogspot.com/ regarding the climate of fear that the children of Islam must endure. (And anyone who tells you that it's different for American Muslims is either a liar or a fool.)

More Islamic vileness towards little girls. Note that this comes from University of Rhode Island Professor, Donna Hughes, an expert on the international trafficing of children as sex slaves (thanks to Religion of Pieces):
"An 11-year-old girl was married off to a 27-year-old man. The father, who had seven daughters, received $300 for his consent. The morning after the marriage ceremonies, the girl was taken to hospital suffering from severe lacerations to her genitals."

"According to the penal code, a nine-year-old girl can be punished as an adult by flogging, execution and even stoning. Given the arbitrary punishments and the virtual lack of due process of law, large numbers of children have been executed, in many cases without being officially charged or even having their identities established."

"According to a special "religious decree" issued by Ayatollah Khomeini, virgin women prisoners must be raped before execution to prevent their going to heaven. A Guard conducts the rape the night before their murder. The next day, the religious judge at the prison issues a marriage certificate and sends it to the victim's family, along with a box of sweets."

"...the small children of many young women in Evin Prison are viciously abused ...they are kept "because they are an asset to the prison authorities for gaining confessions." Szimkus ... witnessed several cases where Iranian children were tortured in the presence of their parents.

"One time these guys [torturers] raped a nine-year-old girl. The parents had to watch. The father shook and rattled so badly that he could no longer sign the espionage confession they put before him."

"the Elle magazine reporter wrote in January 1997 about the life of a 9-year-old girl whose destitute parents arranged for her to be a sigheh. The man visits his temporary "wife" every weekend at her father's house, for which privilege he pays her father about $12 per visit. Not surprisingly, AIDS is spreading in Iran at an alarming rate. Despite the serious health and social problems this poses, little is being done to address the crisis."

"The report added that girl children as young as ten, instead of spending their days playing with other children, were being forced to marry men three to four times their age. Meanwhile as "married women," they are banned from attending school. "

And more (from Catholic Resources on the Internet --
http://www.cathud.com/LINKS/pages_GL/Islam.htm):

"female genital mutilation is normally performed by traditional practitioners with crude instruments, such as knives, razors, blades and broken glass, usually without anesthetics." 1

This report finds that, though some girls are mutilated at birth, "most girls are mutilated between the ages of 4 and 12."

"Young girls who are sentenced to death in Islamic countries present a problem for Islamic authorities. Islamic clerics and rulers, unsatisfied with a mere penalty of death for the accused, wish to ensure that these women will suffer eternity in hell as well. However, quite a number of the accused girls are virgins, and Islam teaches that virgins go to Paradise upon their deaths. As a solution this problem, in order to ensure the damnation of the accused, Islamic authorities will often order the prison guards to systematically rape female prisoners before they are killed.

According to Amnesty International, this practice is widespread in Islamic countries. "During Khomeini's rule, the minimum age for the death penalty for girls was nine years old, and all these girls were systematically raped before they were executed. All this to ensure damnation. All under the sanction of law. All because of the teachings of the Koran.

What this all adds up to is a very unpleasant picture. Those girls who are in prison on fornication charges are actually victims of rape. The remaining female prisoners are raped to ensure damnation. It is no exaggeration to say that Islamic countries are nations of rape victims.

"Partially due to the fact that these girls have already undergone the sexual mutilation of female circumcision, and partially due simply to their juvenile biological makeup, these children suffer immensely when they are married. In Egypt, honeymoon centers have been built outside communities "so that the screams of the brides will not be heard." 11

"There is no nice way to say it: Moslems across the world are practicing pedophiliac rape, a most vicious form of child abuse, and nothing in their behavior contradicts "true Islam." ...Islamists have for centuries preached that the rape of child slaves is perfectly commendable in the eyes of Allah.

"Imagine for a moment the life of a young Christian girl in an Islamic country, such as Sudan. She is abducted from her parents in a slave raid at the age of four. She is given a new Islamic name and, under gunpoint, forced to pray as a Moslem. At age five, she is forced to undergo the torture of mutilation. At age six, she is engaged to a man ten times her age. At age nine, she is married and repeatedly forcibly raped. For the next year, she is beaten daily. At age ten, she is forcibly raped by another Moslem man, and is sentenced to death because of a charge of fornication. The night before her death, she is raped by a prison guard and assured that she will spend eternity in hell. The next day, she is whipped with lashes until she dies."

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES URGENTLY NEEDED
Posted by Irving Zwick, January 31, 2007.
This is by Jim Kloeppel (kloeppel@uiuc.edu), Physical Sciences Editor, University of Illinois, and is entitled "Alternative energy sources needed to mitigate global warming, scientists say." This prescient article was originally published October 31, 2002, in http://www.news.uiuc.edu/scitips/02/1031globalwarming.html (news@uiuc.edu). What have we done since then?)

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- Regulations alone will not stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and curb global warming, an international team of climate and technology experts says. What's needed is the further development of alternative energy technologies that permit worldwide economic development while simultaneously stabilizing carbon dioxide levels and controlling climate change.

In an article published in the Nov. 1 issue of the journal Science, scientists at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and their collaborators evaluate known advanced energy technologies for their capability to supply carbon-emission-free energy and their potential for large-scale commercialization. There are no simple solutions, they say.

During the last century, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased from about 275 parts per million to about 370 parts per million. Unchecked, it will surpass 550 parts per million by the end of this century, the article states. Climate models and paleoclimate data indicate that 550 parts per million of carbon dioxide, if sustained, could eventually produce global warming comparable in magnitude to the global cooling of the last Ice Age.

Primary power consumption today is about 12 terawatts, of which 85 percent is fossil-fueled.

"As world population increases and we strive for a higher standard of living -- particularly in the developing nations -- more energy will be consumed, with an attendant rise in carbon dioxide emissions," said Michael Schlesinger, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Illinois and a co-author of the paper. "We must limit the levels of emissions at some point, and that means we will have to replace fossil fuels with alternative sources that eliminate or significantly reduce the amount of carbon emissions."

The most effective way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while continuing to support economic growth and equity is to develop revolutionary technologies for energy production, distribution, storage and conversion, the article states.

Although some alternative energy sources exist -- wind power, solar and nuclear fission, for example -- they are more expensive than fossil fuels and therefore less likely to be implemented on a grand scale. "An effective energy policy would not focus on just one of the many possible alternatives," Schlesinger said. "There is no clear winner at this time that could fully replace fossil fuels."

Another possible approach is sequestration -- where carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuels would be collected and stored in trees, oceans and other potential reservoirs.

"While carbon capture and sequestration could eliminate the carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, the technology is still in its infancy, and much work remains to make it viable," said Atul Jain, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Illinois and a co-author of the paper.

The message presented in the article is clear, Jain said. "To reduce carbon dioxide emissions and stabilize the climate, we must switch to alternative energy sources. We need to invest in new technologies and make them cost effective."

The article concludes: "Combating global warming by radical restructuring of the global energy system could be the technology challenge of the century. ... Although regulation can play a role, the fossil fuel greenhouse effect is an energy problem that cannot be simply regulated away."

Researchers collaborating on the project are from Columbia University, Exxon Mobil Research and Engineering Co., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, McGill University in Canada, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Naval Research Laboratory, New York University, University of Arizona, University of California at Irvine and University of Houston. Martin Hoffert of New York University was the lead author of the article. The U.S. Department of Energy funded the project.

Contact Israel Zwick at israel.zwick@earthlink.net

To Go To Top

FBI ENABLERS OF THE RELIGION OF PEACE THROUGH BARBARISM
Posted by Michael Travis, January 31, 2007.

No one should be surprised by the Fed's lack of interest in protecting Jews.

This was posted by Pamela Geller Oshry today on Atlas Shrugs
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/), quoting from Debby Schlussel's website.

Kill All Kikes"

This comes from Debby Schlussel's website
(www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/01/muslim_indicted.html).

[...] death threats from four diverse members of the "Religion of Peace," threatening to murder me and my family members, after raping and torturing me. And I take them very seriously.

Last week, one of them--Robert Mustaq John--pled guilty in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of New York, and the previous week, another--Wasil Burki--was indicted in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. I've posted the court documents associated with both, herein, as well as a reposting of their death threats.

It's important to note that justice for me did not come nearly as easily as it comes for American Muslims who get action from the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, upon the whine about a hangnail. Mr. John sent his death threat to me almost 3.5 years ago. And I am only now finally getting justice, after going through a lot of baloney. I also believe that were it not for my having a loud and influential voice on this site and elsewhere in the media, nothing would have happened at all.

I compare this to the lightning speed that FBI agents and Justice Department lawyers moved in indicting and convicting two New York men who sent largely benign, anti-Muslim e-mails to extremist, hate-mongering Imam Hassan Qazwini, on the weekend of Nicholas Berg's televised beheading. Within a month of their e-mails, FBI agents raided both men's homes, and they were indicted shortly thereafter. Unlike my cases, they were not given plea deals. One of the men, Michael Bratisax, is a quadriplegic veteran in a wheelchair. (As I've written, the USDOJ has a special affirmative action prosecution program for Muslim "victims"--you and I aren't equal to them in "Justice"'s eyes.)

The case should have been assigned to the FBI's civil rights agents in Detroit. It was, instead, sent to Ouellet, a lackluster agent in a satellite office.

Agent Ouellet told me that I remind him of his daughter who was in a University of Michigan sorority and who hated the Jewish sororities (for the record, I've never been in one). He elaborated on "the Jews" at Michigan. If I were Muslim, that conversation never would have taken place. Agent Ouellet went on to do nothing. After 6 months of him not investigating the case, he informed me that he gets death threats every day and I should just deal with it, hanging up on me. I guess he was just too busy writing his book about "right-wing" Michigan militias to actually investigate this death threat I took very seriously.

I complained to Agent Ouellet's supervisor, Bill Edwards. Agent Edwards was not much more help. He first told me that the e-mailer was a woman, that FBI agents in Brooklyn had "her" driver's license and located her. Eventually, "she" was a he, and in fact agents really hadn't seen the driver's license or done any work on the case until that point. Then, Agent Edwards called and told me that Robert Mustaq John "didn't really mean it," promised not to harm me, and could I just drop this and move on.

Agent Edwards also told me the case was being overseen by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sheldon Light. To date, I've never spoken with Light because he never returned a single phone call (he was too busy prosecuting the men who e-mailed Imam Qazwini). He transferred the case to Brooklyn, where it would languish for over three years, and that was the point.

I since learned that U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III a/k/a "Abu Porno" personally opposed prosecuting any death threats involving me and recused himself and his entire office from the cases for two reasons: 1) He didn't like what I wrote about him and his strange "liaisons" with the most extremist members of Detroit's Islamic community, including a "former" terrorist; and 2) it would get in the way of his office's relations with Muslims to actually prosecute them for hate crimes. He didn't want to relinquish his role as the Fed's chief Pander Bear to Islamists in town. Incredible.

Justice for Debbie's would be murderers? Good. But and there is a huge but. This is a particularly disturbing story not merely because of the disgusting, vile death threats. We have come to expect that from the savages of religion of peace. No, what is frightening, truly, is the reluctance and downright hostility the FBI exhibited in not pursuing these crimes by Islamists.

Useful idiots over at the FBI

Go over to Debbie Schlussel's blog at
(www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/01/muslim_indicted.html) and check out the new antisemitism and just how far Islam has infiltrated the FBI and the criminal justice system. (hat tip Pastorius)

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

CORRECTING CARTER'S FALSEHOODS
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 31, 2007.

"CORRECT CARTER'S FALSEHOODS:" That begins CAMERA's full-page ad addressing the publishers of Jimmy Carter's "foundation of lies" book against Israel.

Some of the book's points I took up in earlier discussions, but his actual statements are so flagrant, reflecting thoroughness only in dissembling, as to be worth displaying.

On p.57: "The 1949 armistice demarcation lines became the borders of the new nation of Israel and were accepted by Israel and the US and recognized officially by the United Nations." P.215 suggests as an option for Israel, "withdrawal to the 1967 border specified in UN Resolution 242 and as promised in the Camp David Accords and the Oslo Agreement." Such misstatements about borders occur throughout.

The Resolution and Accords do not require a return to the pre-1967 lines but negotiation. Those were just armistice lines, hence no reason to consider them official. Israel does have official borders with Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan (not with Syria and P.A.).

(Where did Carter come up with the claim of "recognized officially?" He makes assertions without attribution that can be checked. His statements do not reflect those documents. One wonders whether he read them and whether his book admits he and his causes received hundreds of millions of dollars from the Arabs.)

P.51 states, "...important provisions of our agreement (of 1978) have not been honored since I left office. The Israelis have never granted any appreciable autonomy to the Palestinians (Arabs)...

Actually, the Arabs violated all their agreements, willfully and imperialistically, but Carter tries to make Israel seem responsible for non-fulfillment. Oslo gave the Arabs "control of political, civic, security, medical, educational and media institutions." Israel withdrew from large areas, to let the Arabs run their internal affairs. Arafat used the opportunity to make war. To stop his attacks on Israeli civilians, IDF troops had to move in, at times. Carter ignores Arab aggression and condemns Israeli self-defense.

Carter claims on p.62 that Arafat told him that the PLO never advocated destroying Israel, and that the Zionists pretended that the PLO wanted to "Drive the Jews into the sea." (The slogan was declared by Arab capitals in the 1947 war and scripted into the PLO Covenant. The PLO called for jihad and waged it. Carter is lying, again.)

He also falsely accuses Israel, on p.190, of building the security fence "...entirely within Palestinian territory, intruding deeply into the W. Bank..." As the UNO confirmed, 45% of the fence actually follows the green line. The rest of the fence is in disputed territory, to be negotiated. Some of the fence is in Israeli territory. The fence has reduced suicide attacks, saving lives noticeably. Carter does not have the grace to give the fence credit for that (NY Sun, 12/29, p.8). Look at the maps. The adjective "deeply" is exaggerated.

It shames our country to have an ex-President so ignorant of a key issue in which he was involved, and to disseminate falsehoods about it, or to be a paid agent of the Arab enemies of our country, or both. He seems to have collected between the covers of one book a host of false Arab propaganda assertions. He makes Bush appear brilliant.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

THE ARITHMETIC OF JIHAD
Posted by Michael Freund, January 31, 2007.

The media is always telling us that only a "tiny minority" of Muslims support violence and holy war against the West. But just how true is that assertion?

In my column below from today's Jerusalem Post
(www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467849587& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull), I bring a number of facts and figures that suggest otherwise. Like it or not, the arithmetic of jihad is fairly straightforward, and it is time that we stopped pretending otherwise.

Comments may be sent to: letters@jpost.com or to me directly at msfreund@netvision.net.il

It's time we open our eyes and confront reality. Ever since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the media has sought to reassure us that only a tiny minority of Muslims actually support the use of violence against Israel and the West.

It's just a small fringe, a marginal few at best, they tell us, so don't worry about it all too much. One percent or three percent -- who cares? Just sit back, enjoy your morning eggs and coffee and have a nice day.

But a look at the numbers tells a very different story. The extent of support for global jihad is frightening in its proportions, and the numbers are anything but insignificant.

Consider, for example, the following statistics regarding support for suicide bombings and other types of terror attacks.

In a poll conducted five months ago, and broadcast on Britain's Channel 4 TV, nearly 25% of British Muslims said the July 7, 2005, terror bombings in London, which killed 52 innocent commuters, were justified. Another 30% said they would prefer to live under strict Islamic Sharia law rather than England's democratic system.

Now, one in four justifying terror may not be a majority, but it certainly isn't a "small fringe" either.

In other countries, the figures are no less unsettling. A survey published in December found that 44% of Nigerian Muslims believe suicide bombing attacks are "often" or "sometimes" acceptable. Only 28% said they were never justified.

According to the annual Pew Global Attitudes Survey, released in July 2006, "roughly one-in-seven Muslims in France, Spain and Great Britain feel that suicide bombings against civilian targets can at least sometimes be justified to defend Islam." The report also found that less than half of Jordan's Muslims believe terror attacks are never justified. In Egypt, only 45% of Muslims say terror is never justified.
 

STILL THINK only a "tiny minority" are in favor of violence? In Israel, the percentages are even more alarming. After Cpl. Gilad Shalit was abducted by Hamas terrorists last summer, a poll conducted by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center revealed that 77.2% of Palestinians supported the kidnapping, while 66.8% said they would back additional such attacks.

More than six out of 10 Palestinians also said they were in favor of firing Kassam rockets at Israeli towns and cities.

And lest you think that war fever lay behind the results, consider this: four additional polls published in September, nearly a month after the Lebanese conflict had ended, all found large majorities of Palestinians backing terror attacks against the Jewish state.

Indeed, in various countries around the world, support for Muslim fundamentalist terror groups appears to be widespread.

On the fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a survey conducted by Al-Jazeera asked respondents, "Do you support Osama Bin-Laden?" A whopping 49.9% answered: yes.

And the July 2006 global Pew survey found that among Muslims, a quarter of Jordanians, a third of Indonesians, 38% of Pakistanis and 61% of Nigerians all expressed confidence in the mass murderer who founded al-Qaida.

In Lebanon six months ago, the Beirut Center for Research and Information found that over 80% of the Lebanese population said they supported Hizbullah.

And do I need also to mention that a majority of Palestinians backed Hamas in parliamentary elections last year? Sure, there are also places where support for violent jihad is not as high. As Reuters reported on October 15, just 10 percent of Indonesian Muslims said they backed jihad and supported bomb attacks on the island of Bali aimed at foreign tourists.

But Indonesia is home to more than 200 million Muslims, so while 10 percent may sound like a small number percentage-wise, it is actually quite large in absolute terms. It means there are some 20 million Muslims in Indonesia alone who are willing to say out loud that they support the use of violence and terror against innocent human beings.

Since when is that a "marginal few"? The question of whether a "tiny" or "sizable" minority backs the global jihad is far more than just one of semantics. It goes to the very nature of the struggle that Israel and the West now find ourselves in.

The figures above, taken from a variety of nations, continents and contexts, all point in one very ominous direction. They demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that the global jihadist movement enjoys a wide and broad base of support that extends far beyond just a minuscule number of supporters.
 

POLITICIANS and journalists might wish to believe, as we all do, that the backers of violent jihad are few and far between, and that they do not represent large numbers of people with like-minded extremist views. But that is simply not the case.

The arithmetic of jihad is quite straight-forward, and it is time we stopped looking the other way and pretending otherwise.

The threat posed by Islamic fundamentalism to Israel and the West can, and must, be met. With determination and a sense of purpose, victory is not out of reach.

But the longer we continue to underestimate the extent of the problem, the more difficult it will be to defeat it.

So let's put aside all that wishful thinking, and roll up our collective sleeves and get to work. Like it or not, the war on terror still faces a long road ahead.

Michael Freund served as an adviser to former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

To Go To Top

DENNIS ROSS: RELEASE POLLARD FROM PRISON
Posted by Justice For Jonathan Pollard, January 30, 2007.
This was written by Rick Kardonne and it appeared today in the Jewish Tribune. Originally Published in Canada December 28, 2006
http://www.jewishtribune.ca/tribune/PDF/jt061228.pdf

Jonathan Pollard should be released from prison, said FOX News foreign affairs analyst and former US Ambassador Dennis Ross, who for more than 12 years played the leading role in shaping US involvement in the Middle East peace process, under the administrations of George Bush and Bill Clinton.

Ross made this statement at a media news conference that preceded the closing celebration of the UJA Federation of Greater Toronto Israel Emergency Campaign 2007, which raised $81 million, $20 million of which was earmarked for the reconstruction of northern Israel on which Hezbollah rockets rained down death and destruction during the July- August 2006 war.

He was the keynote speaker of this event, which took place last week in the George Weston Hall at the Toronto Centre of the Arts.

Pollard was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1989 without parole for supplying US military secrets to Israel without US permission, when he worked for Navy Intelligence. Ross told the Jewish Tribune that while what Pollard did was wrong according to US law, that his sentence was excessive. Pollard still sits in a maximum security prison.

Ross said that he told both Bushes, father and son, as well as Clinton that Pollard should be released.

Ross told the Jewish Tribune that the present Bush administration shows no interest in releasing Jonathan Pollard.

"The National Security Council and the CIA strongly opposed Pollard's release," Ross said. "They maintain that Pollard knew facts that would jeopardize national security. But Pollard has been in jail for so long that whatever facts he might know would have little if any effect on national security today."

In his keynote address, Ross, who had just returned from Israel and Ramallah earlier that same day, evoked the most positive audience response when he initially discussed Iran and the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group. But Ross provoked some skeptical reaction when he dealt with the so-called "moderation" of PA president Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah faction, which is currently involved in a civil war against Hamas.

"Iran is a challenge everywhere. When Iran president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad not only denies the Holocaust, vows to wipe Israel off the map, and says that Israel will disappear soon, this is a major existential threat to Israel. If Iran goes nuclear, then the whole Mideast will go nuclear. We don't want Iran to go nuclear."

Ross skilfully debunked the notion that meaningful sanctions against Iran are being considered by the UN or even the US. "On Aug. 31, Iran was supposed to face a UN sanctions motion for failing to suspend its nuclear enrichment program. One of the proposed sanctions was that there would be no trade with Iran, but Russia would be exempt from this sanction. Another sanction was that Iranian students would not be allowed to study nuclear physics overseas." In other words, the proposed sanctions have to them an element of farce.

To demonstrate that the possibility of a nuclear Iran is not only a threat to Israel in the region, Ross stated that "on Dec. 14, Saudi Arabia announced that it will create a nuclear energy program to be a counterpoint against Iran." Once this happens, Ross feels that Egypt and other Arab states will follow suit. Ross also mentioned that Saudi Arabia "knows that Hamas and Hezbollah are arms of Iran. Saudi Arabia is afraid of Iran. And Saudi Arabia is so afraid of Iran-backed insurgents that it is building a security fence along its entire border with Iraq.

Ross said that while the Baker-Hamilton Iraq study group might have some sound recommendations regarding Iraq, such as that Iraqis should shoulder the brunt of the current internal fighting; its attempt to link Iraq to the Israel-Palestinian Arab conflict makes no sense. "Iraq's problems are internal. The solution to the Iraq civil war lies within Iraq." He had harsh words for Baker's insistence that Israel must make major concessions for the Iraq war to be settled, and especially condemned Baker's advice that Iran and Syria be brought in to moderate the Iraq war; a recommendation that President George W. Bush has rejected.

Ross drew his most evident audience approval when he declared that "unilateralism (on the part of Israel when it withdrew from south Lebanon in 2000 and Gaza in 2005) doesn't work. However, his belief that Israel should "support moderate Palestinians," meaning Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah faction, against Hamas, did not get the same ringing endorsement.

See Also:

Excerpts from "The Missing Peace" by Dennis Ross
http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2005/022005.htm

The Wye Double-Cross Page
http://www.jonathanpollard.org/wye.htm

Terror in The US and the Jonathan Pollard Case by Larry Dub Esq.
http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2001/092601.htm

Contact Justice4JP at Justice4JP@gmail.com or go to the website
http://www.jonathanpollard.org

To Go To Top

CHECKPOINTS DOWN,INFILTRATORS UP
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 30, 2007.

ISRAEL APPROVES EGYPTIAN ARMS FOR ABBAS FORCES

The reward for Abbas allowing arms smuggling, which profited Hamas as well as his own forces, is that Israel approved a shipment of arms to Abbas to counteract Hamas. Likud believes most of those arms would turn on Israel. "It's like a policeman saying, 'No one can have a gun, because you might shoot me -- but because one group has obtained guns, I'll let the rest of you have some as well," (IMRA, 12/26) to even up your rivalry.

Likud PM Netanyahu found that the arms Israel allowed Arafat to maintain order were used against Israel. Olmert is making the same mistake again. No excuse for him.

OLMERT'S "PINPOINT" POLICY NOT FEASIBLE

Trying to maintain his one-sided ceasefire, PM Olmert reluctantly decided to allow a bit of counter-attacking. He said the IDF may attack Gaza crews about to launch rockets or after they have done so. The brass told him that there is very little chance of that succeeding. Therefore, the policy is almost useless. The military situation warrants authorization to open fire on crews moving into position. Often they do so away from population centers, in areas nearer Israel, and are more easily spotted (Arutz-7, 12/28).

With an intelligence system, Israeli security agencies know where many terrorists are, in between missions. It should be allowed, as formerly, to intercept them.

CHECKPOINTS DOWN, INFILTRATORS UP

PM Olmert has approved a plan to take down some checkpoints. He has raised the number of Arabs who may enter Israel. He accompanied those concessions with a declaration, "The proposed plan is likely to contribute to an improved atmosphere, to the strengthening of moderate forces and the distancing of the civilian population from the circle of terrorism." He asserted that Israel would fight against terrorism as determinedly as ever. "Terrorists have taken advantage of previous gestures in the past to travel freely and perpetrate attacks." The news brief gave a couple of examples of removing checkpoints, the resulting terrorism, and having to reinstate those checkpoints. Checkpoints serve an anti-terrorist purpose, after all (Op. Cit.).

What can justify removing checkpoints, when experience repeatedly requires their reinstatement. How irresponsible to offer openings for more terrorist attacks! There are no moderate Arab forces. The Arabs support terrorism because it is of their religion.

Olmert's decisions contradict his declaration. The declaration is meant to mollify his people's concern. Polls ought to check whether such declarations do.

CEASEFIRE IN SIDEROT

Most of the 57 rockets launched at Israel were aimed at the civilian town of Siderot. Residents describe the official ceasefire as, "We cease, they fire." (Bedein, Media@actcom.co.il.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

MOVING ON IN SDEROT
Posted by Judy Lash Balint, January 30, 2007.

Sima Abukasis looked on quietly as Chief Rabbi Yonah Metzger and Knesset members joined dozens of her Sderot neighbors and friends yesterday at a modest commemoration of the second anniversary of the death of her daughter, Ella, 17, who died of wounds suffered from a Kassam rocket attack on Sderot in 2005. Sima, a slight woman with olive skin and short auburn hair, managed a wan smile as she greeted her daughter's friends and family members who came to take part in the ceremony in the center of Sderot. The pain of the loss of her middle child is firmly etched on the face of this bereaved mother. Ella died shielding her younger brother, Tamir, as the siren sounded on a Shabbat afternoon on a cool January afternoon two years ago.

That day, the Abukasis family was at Ella's grandmother's home celebrating the birthday of one of the granddaughters. From there Ella went with her younger brother Tamir to their Bnei Akiva youth movement activity. They were on their way home when the siren sounded, giving them 20 seconds warning of an incoming Kassam rocket. With no time to take cover, Ella lay on top of Tamir, who escaped with relatively minor wounds when the rocket fell and exploded alongside them. Ella was fatally wounded and died a week later without ever regaining conciousness.

Ella's older brother, Ran, did most of the organizing of yesterday's memorial ceremony. Held just a few days before Tu B'Shvat, the memorial was also a dedication of a new Bnei Akiva building named for Ella. Outside the bright new facility that includes several meeting rooms, a kitchen and main hall, six saplings were planted in honor of Tu B'Shvat and to signify new beginnings. The fresh earth was dug by a few of Ella's male friends who are students at Sderot's Hesder Yeshiva. The young men, who combine Torah learning with army service, include representatives of every ethnic group in Israeli society--Ethiopians, Russian speakers, Sephardim and Ashkenazim. Their cameraderie and cooperation is evident as they greet each other with warm hugs and slaps on the back before they get down to the digging.

Many teachers from the the yeshiva and Ella's AMIT high school show up too, and the respect and warmth they elicit from the students would be the envy of teachers anywhere. Maybe it's the simple solidarity born from the terrifying experiences they've shared over the past six years since Sderot has been under Arab bombardment: several schools in Sderot have taken direct hits from Kassam rockets and now they're commemorating the death of one of their friends.

Chief Rabbi Metzger affixes a large mezuza on the external door of the new building, noting that at the request of the family it's a mezuza that was blessed by Rabbi Kedourie, the centenarian kabbalist who passed away a few years ago.

Inside the main hall, a huge banner with a picture of a smiling, relaxed Ella adorns the wall. At the head table, a single memorial candle burns in front of the seated dignitaries. In addition to Rabbi Metzger there's Rabbi Benny Lau; Knesset members Hanan Porat, Tzvi Hendel, Uri Ariel; former Defense Minister Yitzhak Mordechai--a family friend; the principal of the AMIT High School; Ella's father, Yonatan and the head of Bnei Akiva for the southern region.

Each of them speaks lovingly of Ella, her brief life and her heroic death. For a change, it's a quiet day in Sderot with no Kassam attacks. But for Yonatan and Sima Aubkasis and their remaining children, Ran, Tamir and Keren as well as the families of the other seven Kassam fatalities in Sderot, there'll never be a quiet day.

Judy Lash Balint is an award-winner investigative journalist and author of "Jerusalem Diaries: In Tense Times" (Gefen). It is available for purchase from www.israelbooks.com

To Go To Top

THE EILAT BOMBING MUST BE AVENGED!
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 30, 2007.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, after carefully considering the advice of his military and security experts, rejects proposals for military action, opting not to retaliate against perpetrators of the recent Eliat homicide/suicide bombing resulting in the death of three Israelis and the wounding of many others. How indeed can this politico turn the other cheek on such a blatant attack against innocent civilians by Jihad Islami vermin? Does he not realize that no response will embolden such dregs of humanity to commit further horrific crimes against Israel? Does he not realize that no response will only exacerbate the economic fallout bound to rear its ugly head over a community ever dependent on tourism? Does he not hear the clarion call 'never again' imploring him to avenge this atrocity by deploying troops, shutting down roadways, putting up fences, and in effect inflicting punishment so severe to citizens of the out of control Gaza Strip that movers and shakers within that community will feel the wrath of ordinary Arabs demanding they incarcerate or kill extremist Arabs responsible for the resultant misery caused by Israel's necessary reaction.

Clearly, protestors en masse must condemn Olmert's non-response to a horrendous tragedy. Every day that goes by without a substantial IDF response will cast further shame upon a perceived feckless state, its government, and every Jewish Israeli that will not aggressively express his or her revulsion at the outrage. Furthermore, how can the Prime Minister ignore those families directly affected by this craven act of martyrdom, in effect telling them their nation will not avenge the torment forever etched on their psyches by a cadre of human filth that deserves to be excised from the soil they contaminate much like a cancerous tumor is surgically removed from an afflicted patient.

Moshe Dayan once asserted,"It was in our power to set high price for our blood, a price too high for the Arab community, the Arab army, or the Arab governments to think it worth paying." Might Olmert ponder those words, perhaps unearthing a dollop of courage buried within the catacombs of his stone cold soul? What twisted logic dulls any sensible thoughts that surely should rule the behavior of this 'presumed' rational national leader? Can Olmert truly believe he behaves responsibly? Can he truly believe that passivity will quell those rabid jihadist predators praying to Allah each night that Jewish Israel will be no more? Dayan also observed,"We are a small nation, but strong." These are words that must be heeded now. If the somnambulistic weak Prime Minister of Israel cannot envision the pitfalls in the road he travels, cannot change course and avenge the tragedy perpetrated on the innocent victims of Eliat, let him step aside and be replaced by a highly intelligent intrepid leader who will act in Israel's best interests. This nation cannot afford to bear the consequences of irresponsible stewardship in such troubling times!

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

LIVNI, PERES, ABBAS SHARE VISIONS FOR PA STATE
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 30, 2007.

NOTE! Israel's Foreign Minister Tzipy Livni follows Yitzhak Rabin who once said to Yassir Arafat that 'he has yet to have his Altalena.' Now Livni herself is prepared for her perfidious Altalena.

As a reminder, it was Yitzhak Rabin, on then Prime Minister David Ben Gurion's orders, on June 20, 1948 shelled and sank the Altalena which was carrying Jewish refugees from the Holocaust in Europe as well as munitions for the on-going war pledged by the Arabs.

Ben Gurion knew that Menachem Begin was on that ship. It was well understood that Ben Gurion was adament against sharing political power with Begin. Rabin also ordered his troops to fire on the Jews trying to swim to shore as the Altalena was sinking. Thirteen Jews were killed and 48 were wounded.

Tzipi Livni compares driving honest hard-working Jews out of Gush Katif in Gaza with Terrorist President Authority Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen) taking control of Judea and Samaria with a coalition of forces to be assembled in order to drive the Jewish inhabitants out of their Land.

As the slick twisty lawyer, today's Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert is known to be, he spins the story of learning and correcting his mistakes of the Lebanon fiasco that he was responsible for. Like a greased pig, he dashes about making it difficult to get your hands on him. Olmert only wants to stay in power so he can make everything right, now that he knows what to do or -- so he says!

Even Gen. Halutz, Commander of this summer's Lebanon fiasco, has clearly stated in his testimony that, although he accepts considerable blame for the absurd mistakes in the Lebanon fumble, it was Olmert and Peretz who share that blame for directing the policies that ran that war. Halutz properly "took conclusions" and resigned but Olmert and Peretz refuse to do so.

This was written by Alex Traiman and it appeared On Arutz 7 January 26, 2008

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Tzippy Livni, Shimon Peres, and Mahmoud Abbas shared their visions for a two-state solution within the disputed borders of Israel.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzippy Livni made the formation of Palestinian state her top diplomatic priority during her speech at the forum of world leaders. According to Livni, the formation of a state for the Arabs within the biblical territories of Judea and Samaria is "not an illusion. It's there. It's achievable."

"I would like to negotiate, to speak, to meet, to talk," Livni said, signaling an Israeli desire to yet again restart bilateral peace talks. "There is nothing I want more. ... This is part of our dream; this is part of our goal."

While acknowledging that terrorism must be reigned in for a two-state solution to viable, Livni compared any future decision by the Palestinian Authority to stop terror, to the Israeli government's decision to expel 10,000 citizens from their homes during the Gush Katif Disengagement of August 2005.

"There are difficult decisions to take on both sides, and fighting terrorism is one of those decisions, and we cannot afford to put this obstacle aside. I know that it is not easy," Livni said. "I can say it was also difficult for me to vote in favor of the disengagement plan. I voted to uproot Israelis, in order to give peace a chance. So there are difficult decisions, but the best way is to give an answer, and not to say, 'Okay this is too difficult, let's find something else.'"

The Israeli government has already formed a committee to study the ability to remove as many as 100,000 Jewish residents from their homes in the areas considered for the creation of a Palestinian State.

Livni cautioned PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas against compromising with extreme elements within the Authority, labeling Abbas one of the "moderate" forces within the PA. This despite calls by Abbas at a Ramallah Fatah rally last week for arms ostensible received to protect him and his Fatah faction from Hamas "to be turned against Israel," who he referred to as "occupying forces."

Livni added in her address that any Arab refugees currently living in Judea and Samaria should be resettled in an Arab state to be created over those territories, as opposed to the PA demand that refugees be allowed to find homes within the Israeli populace. While Abbas also stressed his commitment to return to the negotiating table, he reiterated long-standing Arab demands that any refugees be resettled in Israel, and not in any newly created Palestinian nation.

"The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is one of the most serious conflicts that require a solution," Abbas said during his address. "I am fully convinced that despite all the difficulties, an atmosphere conducive to the resumption of the peace process exists. One that could lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state."

He added that a "just solution" must be found to solve the refugee crisis, stating that "refugees wishing to return to their homes ... should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date."

Abbas stressed that a permanent resolution is necessary to end the long-standing conflict, as opposed to any temporary decisions, urging Israel to begin discussing issues of final border status, insisting on the Israeli borders of 1967 as a starting point.

"We have the road map. A road map that includes the Arab initiative as well as President Bush's vision regarding the two-state solution," Abbas said. "What is required now, in all honesty, is for us to trace the beginning and the end of this peace process.

Israeli Vice Premier Shimon Peres also addressed the forum, expressing a vision of shared economic cooperation between Israel and the PA.

He said Israel and the Palestinians should work together alongside Jordan to stimulate foreign investment in the region.

Peres stated that Israel, Jordan and PA have already agreed in principle "to take the whole length of the frontier," a 500 kilometer-long strip along the current Israeli-Jordanian border, "and convert it into an ongoing economic zone."

"We cannot save the Dead Sea unless we do it together. We cannot build new industry ... unless we do it together," Peres added.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has already announced plans to gather the Quartet of countries committed to Middle East peace (US, UN, European Union and Russia) in Washington D.C. at the beginning of February. She will return to the Middle East for a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and PA Chairman Abbas, two weeks later.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

NEGOTIATIONS NEVER 'LANGUISHED', THEY WERE VAPORIZED BY THE TERRORISTS
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 30, 2007.
To the Editor of the New York Times

Greg Myre's "Suicide Attack [in Eilat] Is First in Israel in 9 Months" (NY Times, 1.30.07) makes a statement that has no basis in reality: "The attack complicated the... Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, which have languished for six years". "Languished?"

"Six years" means that Myre is referring to the Camp David 2 negotiations of June, 2000. At that time, Arafat rejected what Saudi prince Bandar bin Sultan described as the most generous offer that the Palestinians could ever expect... Arafat's rejection of which would be a "crime against the Palestinian people". Arafat not only rejected the offer, but began the 2nd Intifada a few months later.

During the ensuing six years, Arafat unleashed the most horrific and lethal terror war in all of Israel's history. More than 25,000 attacks, sometimes as many as 24 per day, with more than 1,000 dead and many thousands more wounded or maimed for life.

But even during this barbaric brutal terror war, President Bush and Prime Ministers Sharon and Olmert made repeated offers for Palestinian statehood once the Palestinian Authority stops the terrorism and sits down to peaceful negotiations. All such offers have been met with renewed terrorism, suicide bombers, truck bombs, car bombs, road-side bombs, drive-by shootings, sniper attacks, tunnel attacks, kidnappings, knifings, and the endless relentless hate-speech and hate-preach and hate-teach which demonize Jews and Israel, and prepare the next generation for endless relentless terror war.

The negotiations never "languished". They were vaporized by the Palestinian terrorist leadership in scores of suicide bomber attacks, and hundreds more attempted attacks, and thousands of qassam rocket attacks; all of which demonstrate the continued commitment of Palestinian leadership to the visionary promise of late Hamas leader, sheikh Akhmed Yassin: "we will destroy Israel, even if we must do it one Jew at a time."

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

WHY DO THEY CAIR ABOUT JACK BAUER?
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 30, 2007.

I wanted to send you this important article that appeared in the National Review Online. the chairman of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a former U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander speaks up.

It's time for hundreds of thousands of Muslims to publicly show their outrage to Islamo fascism and to commit themselves to fight the fight to eradicate Radical Islam.

Good suggestion: Muslim-community youth become the Jack Bauers of America. Best way to dispel stereotyping of Muslims is to create new image of Muslims who publicly lead this war against militant Islamists in the domestic and foreign media battlefield.

The way to fight the realities of the series 24 is to create a Muslim Counter Terrorism Unit, a deep Muslim counter terrorism ideology and a national action plan for our security

This was written by M. Zuhdi Jasser, and it appeared January 29, 2007 on National Review Online
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/ ?q=MjlmMTQzN2IxMTFlZTFlNzZiZmEzMjEzY2I2MDkzOWE Zuhdi Jasser is the chairman of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a former U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander.

Yet again, the old, tired "major" American Muslim organizations have come out in full force to object to something unobjectionable. This time, they're angry about the storyline of 24, the highly popular TV drama on Fox: When the recent premiere episode ended with a terrorist network detonating a nuclear device in a Los Angeles suburb, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) announced its fear that "this would serve to increase anti-Muslim prejudice in American society." The show had begun with a depiction of an America gripped in fear after an eleven-week run of suicide bombings, apparently by radical Islamist terror cells, in cities across the country.

The show addresses a real concern. While the U.S. has not been the victim of an attack since 9/11, a vast array of networks have been dismantled around the world -- including a plot run out of London that was targeting the U.S. And, since 9/11, there have been a number of successful attacks upon civilian populations in other parts of the globe -- in Bali, Istanbul, Spain, London, Egypt, Jordan, and other places.

As an American and as a Muslim, I find 24 to be not only a profoundly engaging program, but one whose portrayal of Muslims in quite fair. In the show, the president's sister works for a "leading" Muslim civil-rights organization in D.C.; she is portrayed as a protector of constitutional freedoms. The head of this Muslim organization, who is in detention, reports to authorities on prisoners' terrorism-related conversations that have alarmed him.

The show also shows the darker, extremist side of Islam -- for example, an Arab-Muslim youth, a previously beloved neighbor in suburban L.A., turns out to be a terrorist thug who provides a key part of the nuclear device while terrorizing his friend's family. This is another, undeniable part of today's Muslim reality: While suitcase nuclear devices have yet to be used, the threat is there, and such characters are probably quite true to life in their depiction of members of al Qaeda cells or other jihadist networks in the West.

Any ethnic group can, of course, voice complaints regarding its portrayal in pop culture. From the frequently maligned American Italian community in organized-crime dramas to the Russian community that was the focus of last year's 24, no ethnic group is entirely safe from the silver screen. But the sad reality is that such crime rings or "networks," which exploit ethnic and religious communities, exist; and they do affect our security.

For American Muslims, though, 24 offers an opportunity to address a key question: To the extent Muslims have a bad image on TV, what can we do to change that?

All patriotic American Muslims who watch 24's evil Muslim characters unfold their plot to destroy the U.S. quite naturally are enraged. We have an overwhelming desire to reach into the TV set and let all the non-Muslim characters witness a Muslim leading the nullification of this radical Islamist threat.

But the public face of American Muslim activity against terror -- and the against the ideology that feeds it -- has so far been inadequate. Other than press-release condemnations, there has been virtually no palpable public effort from the greater Muslim community in this regard. If that public movement against Islamism existed, 24's writers would probably have included it in the story line.

So if this drama hits too close to home, perhaps offended Muslims should use this TV program as an emotional stimulus for change. To this point, the Muslim community has been able to completely avoid any real debate over Islamism. In fact, we see now a movement in England and the West to blame the West's foreign policy as a root cause of terror rather than the real root cause -- theocratic Islamist ideology.

It's time for hundreds of thousands of Muslims to be not only private but public in their outrage -- and to commit themselves to specific, verbal engagement of the militants and their Islamism. We, as American Muslims, should be training and encouraging our Muslim-community youth to become the future Jack Bauers of America. What better way to dispel stereotypes than to create hundreds of new, real images of Muslims who are publicly leading this war on the battlefield and in the domestic and foreign media against the militant Islamists.

Condemnations by press release and vague fatwas are not enough. We need to create organizations -- high-profile, well-funded national organizations and think tanks -- which are not afraid to identify al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah by name, and by their mission as the enemies of America.

If Muslim organizations and the American Muslim leadership were seen publicly as creating a national, generational plan to fight Islamism -- rather than searching for reasons to claim victimhood -- then the issues and complaints surrounding such TV shows would disappear. The way to fight the realities of 24 is to create a Muslim CTU, a deep Muslim counterterrorism ideology and a national action plan for our security.

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com or visit her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

ARE WE "JEWS OF SILENCE?"
Posted by Batya Medad, January 29, 2007.
http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2007/01/are-we-jews-of-silence.html

"Nothing's new," as King Solomon said so eloquently in Kohelet, Ecclesiastes.

Concerned Jews and non-Jews all over the world are incredulous at the silence here in Eretz Yisrael.

We have a government

which consists of politicians, who consider corruption their right
which is enthusiastically negotiating with terrorists whose public aim is our destruction
which is considers relying on foreign military an achievement
which cheerfully plans on exiling tens of thousands loyal Jewish citizens from their homes
which does not keep its promises to its citizens
which imprisons and prosecutes those who dare to even peacefully protest.

Those concerned Jews and non-Jews all over the world write to me. They send me very troubled letters. They say:

"We want to protest the corrupt and incompetent Israeli Government, but why aren't Israelis on the streets demonstrating? Why have you become the 'Jews of Silence?'"

For me, a Jewish activist during the 1960's, the term "Jews of Silence" relates to Soviet Jewry during the more than half a century of totalitarian Communist control, when they were persecuted and restricted by the USSR. They lived in fear of the "Gulag." They had no religious freedom, no civil rights. They couldn't live as Jews and they couldn't leave their living hell.

Eli Weisel wrote about the pain he saw in their eyes. Their pain and suffering spoke to him. For many of us, the Save Soviet Jewry Movement was our way of being "civil rights activists" but with a Jewish agenda. World Jewry protested for years until Jews were allowed to escape. A sizeable percentage of Jews from the FSU are now living how they wish wherever they wish.

Nobody is hearing cries and protests from Israel. It seems so much like the Parshot Shavua, the Torah Portions of the Week of this season. We're reading from the beginning of "Shmot," Exodus. Bnai Yisrael, the Jewish People have become slaves to Pharaoh. That's after their enthusiastic welcome by the "previous" Pharaoh. Conditions have been getting worse and worse, but there's silence, but a population explosion. It was only when Pharaoh died that the Jewish people showed any visible or conventional sign of concern. Shmot, Exodus II

23 And it came to pass in the course of those many days that the king of Egypt died; and the children of Israel sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up unto God by reason of the bondage.

24 And God heard their groaning, and God remembered His covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob.

25 And God saw the children of Israel, and God took cognizance of them. {S}

G-d sent Moshe to the scene, but his leadership wasn't so readily accepted. And even when they had finally left Egypt, the Jewish People kept trying to get back there at every opportunity, only remembering the "good."

Modern commentators have compared the stages Bnai Yisrael went through in ancient Egypt to the gradual persecution of the Jews in Nazi Germany, which culminated in their systematic murder. In Ancient Egypt, G-d interfered and sent Moses to save them. That was because the entire Jewish People was enslaved. During the rise of Nazi Germany there were Jews in other parts of the world, and nationalist Zionist Jews in Eretz Yisrael, who were supposed to save European Jewry, but they didn't. The European rabbis of the time also instructed their followers to stay put, rather than be corrupted by the assimilated life-style in other countries, like the United States and Eretz Yisrael. They waited for the goyim to save them. The goyim didn't have saving Jews, stopping the Holocaust, on their agenda; so Jews continued to be murdered until the war was over. That's why six million were murdered.

We're in Eretz Yisrael, our promised land. How can I be comparing us to Bnai Yisrael as slaves in Egypt, or European Jewry during the Holocaust or Soviet Jewry in the USSR? It's the silence. There's a lack of faith in "democratic" means, in the government and in demonstrations. Even massive prayer vigils have proven disappointing. Those of us who were among the half a million Jews who had massed on the Kotel, including those who couldn't get into the plaza, remember that it didn't stop Disengagement. It was ignored by the international press.

We aren't like the Jewish slaves in Egypt, because whether we meet in mass demonstrations or not, we are crying out in pain to G-d. We are also trying to utilize whatever media we can, yes, including blogs, to let the world know.

And this isn't like Nazi Germany, because we are in Eretz Yisrael, and we're neither leaving nor expecting others to save us. But similar to those days, there is much going on behind the scenes that the world isn't aware of. There was Jewish Resistance to the Nazi brutality. And there were righteous Jews who were willing to give up their limited rations and even lives to live as Jews.

The big difference between today in Israel and Soviet Jewry is in the eyes. The eyes of today's Jewish pioneers are not silent. There's no fear. There's strength and pride in being Jewish and settling the Land.

I've spoken to some of the kids who spent weeks and months in Israeli jails after being arrested for protesting Disengagement. They refused to recognize the authority of the judges to judge right from wrong, since the judges' criteria are anti-Jewish. These brave children were not broken. There's eyes are alive and strong.

When the Israeli riot police came to Amona last year to destroy homes and stop the demonstrations, they expected their armor and horses to frighten the demonstrators. They were enraged at the way the kids stared them down and tried to argue with them. Some of the police brutality was from the frustration of those bullies who expected the crowds to flee. They tried to beat the pride out of the kids.

Those kids were amazing. I remember seeing a couple of young teens arguing with police on the road to Jerusalem afterwards. From the body-language it was clear that the kids were stronger.

In ancient Egypt the enslaved Jews fought back with more and more babies, and today the Jewish birthrate in YESHA is also very high. Has G-d decided that the Moshiach will come when we old people are gone, like the slaves had to die off before Bnai Yisrael could enter the Holy Land?

It's obvious that we adults don't have a solution. The State of Israel is not doing its job for the Jewish People. But living in Shiloh, I don't hear silence, I hear and feel action and protest. We are crying out to G-d. Join our prayer here in Eretz Yisrael! And as Jews say everyday in the Amidah, The 18 Blessing Prayer: "...Blessed art You Hashem who causes the Pride of Salvation to flourish." "...Hamatzmi'ach Keren Yishu'a."

Batya Medad lives in Shiloh. She can be reached by email at Shilohmuse@yahoo.com or visit her website
http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/ or go to http://www.shilo.org.il This article is stored at
http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2007/01/are-we-jews-of-silence.html

To Go To Top

AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN'S "RACISM"; JAILS JEW WHO SHOT ARAB THIEF; ARAB YOUTH IN ISRAEL AND CANADA
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 29, 2007.

1. Well it is now official. Israel has an Arab cabinet minister. The Left of course dismisses it as tokenism. Some on the Right were unhappy with the idea. In particular, Avigdor Lieberman's party was opposed. The appointment passed the cabinet unanimously except for Lieberman's single vote against. The new minister is Ghaleb Majadele (Labor Party), who will serve as minister without portfolio (meaning he does nothing), although he wants to become Minister of science, culture, and sport, which would still mean he would do nothing.

Now, the Israeli Left and the media have been having a field day attacking Lieberman and his party as "racists" for opposing the appointmet of Majadele. Amir Peretz, commissar of the Labor Party, has repeatedly denounced Lieberman as a "racist". You would be almost forgiven if you have been reading the Israeli press and were given the impression that Lieberman and his entire party are little better than Russian-born Klansters.

Well, almost forgiven. To understand the truth, you would have to read the small print in Haaretz in a minor inside story.

Several years ago Israel was subjected to the Ehud Barak 2000 capitulation to the Hizbollah in Lebanon, which as everyone knows created no danger at all of Israel being hit with katyusha rockets fired from Lebanon.

As part of that capitulation to terror, quite a few Lebanese Shiites and Christians who had cooperated with Israel in its erstwhile "Southern Lebanon Security Zone" were granted asylum inside Israel, because it was clear that their lives and the lives of their families were in danger once the Hizbollah took control with Ehud Barak's assistance. Other Arabs from the West Bank and Gaza who had assisted Israel in its war against terrorism were similarly granted asylum, since the PLO militias like to murder them. These were placed in homes in Israeli Arab towns where their kids could attend Arabic schools. Until such generosity became the focus of hatred.

In the early years of the 21st century, a series of demonstrations against these Arab "collaborators" were held in Israel, by radical Arabs and by anti-Israel leftist Jews. Some of these demonstrations were quite violent. The protesters denounced those "collaborators" as traitors and "enemies of their own people" because they were "guilty" of the "crime" of having tried to help Israel fight terrorism. Haaretz at the time was filled with denunciations of these people as "traitors".

At the time, I compared the behavior of the protesters to an imaginary set of demonstrations held in 1945 against German and Japanese informants granted residency privileged in the US as reward for helping the Allies against the Axis powers in World War II, where the demonstrators denounce these people as traitors and "enemies of their own people." Of course, no such demonstrations were held in 1946 because there were no Americans so clearly traitorous as to dare to behave in that way.

One of the organizers of the violent demonstrations against these "collaborators" was allegedly none other than the new Arab cabinet minister himself
(see http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/818769.html). A number of innocent Arabs were beaten by the pro-terror "anti-collaborator" protesters and at least one was murdered. There have been a number of calls to block the appointment of Majadele due to his role in inciting the violence and a court petition against the appointment was filed by a lawyer, Shmuel Zang.

Majadele also has a long track record of denouncing Israel for supposed "discrimination" against Arabs (see http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/818769.html)

2. A story that has been making the news in the Israeli media concerns a Jewish farmer in the Negev who shot and killed an Arab Bedouin thief who had broken into his property. The farmer, a religious Jew named Shay Dromi, raises sheep and shot the thief while the latter and three business associates were trying to steal some sheep. The Israeli leftist Prosecutor's Office ordered that the Jewish farmer be prosecuted for manslaugter and jailed for many years, as many as 20 years. The Prosecutor at first considered indicting the farmer for murder. Had the thief been a Jew or the farmer an Arab (or both), it would have been open and shut justifiable manslaughter and self-defense. Dromi also wounded a second thief. A group of 4 thieves in all were trying to break into his property.

In a poll taken this week, 81% of the Israeli public (which is about 20% Arab) indicated they think Dromi was entirely justified in shooting the thief. But Israel's Prosecutor cares not a fig for either natural rights nor for public opinion. 87% of those polled said the cops cannot be relied upon to stop thieves.

Israel's Left is also aghast. How dare a Jew fire at a group of four Arab criminals? After all, Arabs are oppressed so it is their right to steal, right? The Jews owe it to them.

For an excellent legal analysis of this (alas, only in Hebrew), see
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3355718,00.html. Roy Bean, where are you when we really need you east of the Pecos?

3. Suicide Bomber Infiltrated from Gaza
13:16 Jan 29, '07 / 10 Shevat 5767

(IsraelNN.com) The suicide bomber who attacked an Eilat bakery Monday morning is Mohammed al-Saqsaq, 21, of Gaza, an Islamic Jihad terrorist spokesman said.

UPDATE:
"Fatah-Jihad Suicide Terrorist Murders Three in Eilat"
by Hillel Fendel
Arutz-7 (www.IsraelNN.com)

For the first time, a suicide terrorist detonated himself in the southern port city of Eilat. After he hitchhiked to the city, the man who innocently drove him called the police -- but too late. Three Jews were murdered, and five people were treated for shock.

Initial reports implied that the explosion inside a small bakery in Eilat around 9:45 AM was caused by a gas canister explosion. However, shortly after 10:30, the police abruptly issued an announcement saying that it was the work of an Arab suicide terrorist. The police announced that the murderer had entered the bakery carrying a large bag and detonated himself. Three dead were reported, in addition to the terrorist himself.

The Al Aksa Brigades of Fatah -- an arm of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah organization -- and Islamic Jihad have claimed joint responsibility for the murderous attack. In general, Fatah's Al Aksa Brigades has shared responsibility with Islamic Jihad for the terror attacks against Israel over the past two years.

Just three months ago, Fatah was one of four PA terrorist groups that called on Muslims worldwide to attack the United States "with no mercy."

Despite this, Abbas continues to enjoy the international reputation of a "moderate." Earlier this month, the United States pledged $86.4 million to bolster Fatah security forces under his control.

Israel also just recently transferred $100 million in tax monies to the Palestinian Authority. The National Union submitted a motion of no-confidence in the government on this backdrop.

Today's Attack

Around 9:30 in the morning, Eilat police received a call from a man who said he had stopped for a hitchhiker outside Eilat, given him a ride, dropped him off in the Isidore neighborhood -- and that he appeared suspicious. The police sent policemen to the area to investigate, but when they heard the loud blast, they realized they had come too late.

Eyewitnesses questioned by the police said that the bakery was the only store open at that hour. Based on their reports, police surmise that the terrorist was headed for a more crowded spot, but detonated himself in the bakery either because he became scared or accidentally.

The explosion caused tremendous damage, eyewitnesses said, and body parts were strewn over the area.

Israel Police has raised its level of alert throughout the country, as has the Magen David Adom emergency medical service.

Previous Attacks in Eilat

Today is the last day in office for Eilat's Police Chief, Commander Bruno Stein. His first day in the position, Oct. 7, 2004, was the day of the Taba Hilton multiple terrorist bombings in Egypt, just south of Eilat, in which 34 were killed, including 12 Israelis.

On Oct. 5, 1985, an Egyptian soldier fired on Israeli tourists at Ras Burka, just south of Eilat, killing four children and three adults. Both of these attacks were apparently timed to coincide with the anniversary of the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War on Oct. 6, 1973 and the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat on Oct. 6, 1981.

It was reported today that a 17-year-old youth from Alexandria, Egypt was arrested in northern Sinai on his way to enter Israel via the Gaza Strip to carry out a terrorist attack. He left a letter for his family telling of his intention to kill Jews in Israel.

On Nov. 25, 1990, an Egyptian soldier fired at Jewish vehicles at the border near Eilat, killing four and wounding 26. On May 30, 1992, two Palestinian terrorists murdered a man on a beach in Eilat.

Economic Ramifications

Dr. Yoel Mansfeld, head of the Center for Tourism, Pilgrimage and Recreation Research at the University of Haifa, implied that the terrorists were targeting Israel's strong tourism economy in Eilat.

"Just two months ago," he said, "the city hosted a large international conference for travel agents and signs of recovery [from the previous attacks] were emerging, but the effects of today's attack could last at least six months -- assuming it is an isolated incident and not the beginning of a new wave of terror."

"The effect of the attack on internal tourism will be short-term," he said. "Israelis are resilient and they will be back in Eilat in a short time. The problem is with foreign tourism."

4. "Jihadization of youth a 'rapid process'" by Stewart Bell, Canada's National Post.
www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html? id=25e76872-b309-47a7-841b-938bdd9ffd71

TORONTO -- Canada's intelligence service says a "very rapid process" is transforming some youths from angry activists into jihadist terrorists intent on killing for their religion.

Enraged over what they perceive as a Western "war on Islam" and coaxed on by extremist preachers, a few have embraced terrorism with frightening speed, the service warns in a new study. "The transformation from radical to jihadist can be a very rapid process," says the "secret" report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, obtained by the National Post.

The study, released under the Access to Information Act, is the government's latest attempt to understand why a handful of Canadian Muslims are alleged to have become involved in terrorist plots. It comes as a preliminary hearing is underway in Brampton, Ont., for four of 18 suspects charged for their alleged role in a Canadian terrorist group accused of plotting attacks in southern Ontario.

For at least the past two years, CSIS has been studying how some young people have been lured into terrorism. They are particularly interested in what made them radicalized and how they evolved from radicals to violent terrorists, a process known as "jihadization."

The conclusion: It depends on the individual. But analysts have come up with a list of factors they say are leading some Muslims to radicalism. They include the belief in the need to defend Islam from perceived Western aggression, the influence of spiritual leaders and extremist family members, and overseas training, the report says.

"The most important factor for radicalization is the perception that Islam is under attack from the West. Jihadists also feel they must preemptively and violently defend Islam from these perceived enemies.

"They also watch what is happening in the Islamic world and the many conflicts that involve 'Western' or other aggression: Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Chechnya, Afghanistan, and others.

"A few will act on these events and support or carry out terrorism in an attempt to change Western foreign or military policy. These individuals take the violent defence of Islam as a personal goal and religious obligation."

Those who undergo this process of radicalization reject mainstream Islam and instead adopt a narrow, literal, intolerant interpretation, CSIS says.

The CSIS report notes that the failure of some Muslim immigrants to integrate into Western society is also a factor, but "this is seen more in European countries where the Muslim communities are more homogenous and there has been less integration than in North America."

Many Canadians were shocked when the RCMP announced last June 3 it had arrested a group of adults and juveniles for allegedly planning truck bombings in Toronto. The group had also allegedly stockpiled firearms and intended to take hostages at the Parliament buildings in Ottawa and behead them unless Canada pulled its troops out of Afghanistan.

Prosecutors allege the suspected terrorists were encouraged partly by an extremist leader who has claimed that Canadian troops are only deployed to Afghanistan to rape Muslim women.

The report notes that younger jihadists are now often getting their inspiration online from spiritual leaders who are "available 24/7."

While most of those allegedly involved in the "homegrown" terror group were arrested, investigators say Canada harbours other pro-al-Qaeda extremists who could quickly escalate to violence.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

DOES THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT KNOW WHO THE ENEMY IS?
Posted by Professors for a Strong Israel, January 29, 2007.

Just at the time that a suicide bomber, apparently one of Abu Mazen's men, blew up in Eilat and murdered three Jews, a special ministerial committee met in Jerusalem to plan steps against their real enemy: the Jewish one. There is no other way to describe the meeting held by those ministerial failures, Peretz (Defense) and Livni (Foreign Affairs), and others.

Professors for a Strong Israel declares again that ministers who are unfit for their jobs, who cannot understand that there is no cease fire, whose "dream" is to strengthen the enemy -- must be banished from Israel's government.

Contact Professors for a Strong Israel at 050 551 8940 or send an email to Benjamin Svetitsky at bqs@julian.tau.ac.il

To Go To Top

ZOA SUPPORTS WOOLSEY AND ROSS' CALLS FOR POLLARD'S RELEASE
Posted by Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), January 29, 2007.

Fmr. Cia Director Woolsey And Dennis Ross: Release Pollard

New York -- The former Director of the CIA under President Bill Clinton, R. James Woolsey, and former top US. Middle East negotiator, Dennis Ross, have each recently stated that convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard should be released after having already served twenty years in prison. [J4JP: 22 years!] Mr. Woolsey said, "Now that he has served 20 years of a prison sentence, my view is that a 20 year sentence, I think, is enough and I think the close relationship between United States and Israel as fellow democracies is also a consideration so, at this point, I think Pollard has served a long enough sentence" (Israel National News, January 23, 2007).

Mr. Ross stated that Pollard's sentence was excessive and that he should be released, noting that, "Pollard has been in jail for so long that whatever facts he might know would have little if any effect on national security today." Ross also said that he had told Presidents George Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush that Pollard should be released. He said, however, that President Bush is presently showing no interest in releasing Pollard (Jewish Tribune [Canada], December 28, 2006).

ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, "The ZOA welcomes James Woolsey and Dennis Ross' statements recommending that Jonathan Pollard should be released. It needs to be remembered that Jonathan Pollard passed on classified information to Israel, a U.S. ally, not a U.S. enemy. Despite that mitigating fact, Pollard has served a longer prison term than any other person who has spied for an ally. The average term of imprisonment for passing on classified information has been between two and four years, yet Pollard received a life sentence, the same as that handed down to Aldrich Ames, the chief of CIA counterintelligence in Eastern Europe, who passed critical defense secrets to the Soviet Union, an American enemy, during the Cold War. Ames wrought serious harm on the United States, including being found responsible for the deaths of at least 11 U.S. agents.

"It is also wrong that Pollard was shown no leniency, despite having pled guilt as a result of a plea bargain. It is also possible that the harm to American security alleged to have been caused by Jonathan Pollard's actions may well have been caused by the espionage activities of Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen, whose actions came to light only after Pollard was sentenced. Pollard has also expressed in writing deep remorse for breaking the law. All these considerations bear out James Woolsey and Dennis Ross' view that the time has come for Jonathan Pollard to be released."

"Most American Jewish leaders have been pleading for Pollard's release, including the ZOA. I myself have spoken with Pollard over 50 times over the years and have found him to be one of the most brilliant people to whom I've ever spoken. In all these many conversations, he almost never spoke about his own plight or release, only about strong U.S.-Israel relations and the survival of Israel. It would be a tragedy if his legacy is only his imprisonment. He has great talent which he could use to benefit society if only given the chance."


James Woolsey, former Director of the CIA, told Israel National Radio's Alex Traiman that Jonathan Pollard should be freed. Speaking at the Herzliyah Conference this week (19/01/07) Ex-CIA Director, James Woolsey was asked by Arutz-7's Alex Trainman for his opinion on Jonathan Pollard. Woolsey responded that though he has favored a significant punishment for Pollard in the past, "now that he has served [over] 20 years in prison, my view is that 20 years is enough. I also think that the close relationship between the US and Israel is also of some consideration, and at this point I think he's served long enough. "

Click http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2007/012307.mp3 to listen. (It's 1 minute & 41 seconds MP3 audio file).


JUSTICE FOR JONATHAN POLLARD
Website: http://www.JonathanPollard.org
RSS: http://www.JonathanPollard.org/rss.htm

The Zionist Organization of America, founded in 1897, is the oldest pro-Israel organization in the United States. The ZOA works to strengthen U.S.-Israel relations, educates the American public and Congress about the dangers that Israel faces, and combats anti-Israel bias in the media and on college campuses. Its past presidents have included Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis and Rabbi Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Contact them at www.zoa.org or send an email to email@zoa.org

To Go To Top

THE BOLTON CITY COUNCIL IN MANCHESTER HAS BANNED HOLOCAUST DAY
Posted by Simon McIlwaine, January 29, 2007.

This appeared in www.jewishtelegraph.co.uk/man_1.html.
(Hat tip: LGF readers.)

IN A move widely seen to be bowing to Muslim pressure, Bolton Council has scrapped its Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) event.

The council is to replace it with a Genocide Memorial Day in June. This is in line with the policy of the Muslim Council of Britain, which continues to boycott HMD and is asking for a Genocide Day, which will also mark "the ongoing genocide and human rights abuses of Palestinians" by Israelis.

The council decision was made in consultation with the town's Interfaith Council.

But Rabbi Joseph Lever of United Synagogue who has participated in the Bolton event for around three years was not consulted on the decision. He said: "I mourn the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Day event will not take place in Bolton this year."

Louis Rapaport, president of the Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester, was equally disappointed that the Jewish community was not consulted.

He said: "Bolton, alone of all the local authorities in our area, is not having an HMD event which is a government recommendation." He added: "There may not be many Jews in Bolton but the day is supposed to have an educational message to the whole community.

"I can't help feeling the decision was influenced by Bolton's large Muslim community."

This short item from the blogosphere captures some of the discussion on CoHaV quite nicely
David

"Why did you kill your grandmother?"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014973.php

"Questions As Weapons" by Charles Jacobs unmasks a little-noted rhetorical strategy often employed by the jihadists and their allies:
"Why did you kill your grandmother?" That's what Professor Ruth Wisse said to an Arab student at Stanford who asked her, "Why is Israel an apartheid state?"

The student was flummoxed and tried again, "Why is Israel an apartheid state?" Wisse again responded, "Come on now, tell us why you killed your grandmother." A few more rounds of this and the student relented.

According to the Chabad Rabbi who invited Harvard's Wisse to speak, Wisse then explained how some questions are not questions at all, but weapons: If she would have answered his anti-Israel accusation, she would have been trapped, and done damage to her cause. Her "grandmother" riposte was the perfect demonstration of that point:

Having to explain why you're not guilty as charged is a losing proposition.

Yet Jews have allowed themselves to be trapped in a meta-discourse that continuously takes the form: "Israel is bad." "No it's not." Or "It's not as bad as you say."

Indeed, much of the history of hasbara -- Israeli PR -- has been defense against slanderous accusations. The classic handy reference book many students use, "Myths and Facts," a tome fat with expanded revisions to include the evolving set of lies and half-truths hurled at the Jewish state by Arabist propaganda. The formula of the book, which is the formula for much of hasbara training, is to set out the "myth" and then answer it with the true "facts."

Sometimes the "factual" response shows how Israeli conduct is exemplary: "Israel is an apartheid state?" "No," reads the formula. "Apartheid is something very different and cannot be applied to the condition of Palestinians in Israel, who are in fact treated in many ways better than they are in Arab countries." Etc. But even this -- "We are much better than you say" doesn't work, because as long as the discourse focuses on Israeli behavior, we lose.

What to do? Once armed with the realization that the anti-Israel formula accuses Israel of exactly those crimes the Arab/Muslim world has committed, we can work our way out of the corner:

"You say the Jews are guilty of oppression, apartheid, discrimination, expansion by land theft? Not true. What is true is that the Arab world is guilty of every one of these things."

Here's an enhanced "Myths, Facts, and Big Picture" approach:

The Lie: Israel is an apartheid state.

The Truth: That's ridiculous. (See Myths and Facts on why.)

Transition: But I'm glad you brought up apartheid. Christians are fleeing Palestinian-controlled areas due to Muslim violence. Violence against women, especially "honor killings" where male relatives kill females for "improper" sexual relations, are common in Palestinian territories and throughout the Muslim world. Jews are not even permitted to set foot in Saudi Arabia.

The Big Picture: Something similar to apartheid is found in the Arab world, where women and children, gays and lesbians, and Christians and Jews, are controlled, expelled, tormented and killed. That's what we should be protesting.

Contact Simon McIlwaine by email at Simon.McIlwaine@ormerods.co.uk or go to www.anglicansforisrael.com

To Go To Top

LIVNI IS JUST AS DANGEROUS
Posted by Professors for a Strong Israel, January 29, 2007.

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni has demonstrated over and over her unsuitability for her job and for the one she is aiming for, that of Prime Minister. When she places the establishment of a Palestinian state west of the Jordan at the top of her priorities, together with the resettlement of Arab refugees within it, one sees clearly her detachment from the Zionist vision, from the historical inheritance of the Jewish people, and from vital considerations of security and demographics.

Professors for a Strong Israel observes that a Palestinian state already exists east of the Jordan, on 80% of the area of the Land of Israel according to its ancient and its Mandatory borders. Moreover, any Israeli politician who works to strengthen Abu Mazen, who is after all the senior partner of Hamas, aids the enemy's efforts to eliminate the Jewish State.

We conclude that Tzipi Livni, like Olmert and Peretz, her confederates in political bankruptcy, has failed in her duties and must resign her position.

Contact Professors for a Strong Israel at 050 551 8940 or send an email to Benjamin Svetitsky at bqs@julian.tau.ac.il

To Go To Top

TOP TEN REASONS FOR NOT ESTABLISHING A PALESTINIAN STATE
Posted by Israel Zwick, January 28, 2007.

The United Nations has identified almost 5000 distinct ethnic groups living in its 192 member countries (see World Ethnic Groups). Almost 300 of these have been identified as Minorities at Risk. There are over 100 national Liberation Movements that are struggling to develop regional autonomy. Yet almost the entire international community is united in its belief that the 3 million Palestinian Arabs should have their own sovereign state carved out of the minuscule State of Israel like a jigsaw puzzle. This solution, they believe, would relieve the "suffering of the Palestinian people" and resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Ostensibly, this appears to be a sensible solution. After all, if two parties can't manage to live together, they should live separately. One will live on one side of the border, the other will live on the other side of the border and all will be fine and well. But is that a realistic expectation? Let's first examine some of the basic geographic and demographic statistics. If one examines the data in the CIA World Factbook, the two states, Israel and Palestine, would have the smallest areas and largest population densities in the region, except for Lebanon. This would allow little room for population expansion. Such two micro-states would not be able to survive without a great deal of mutual cooperation. Neither could be economically viable by just remaining within their own borders. There would have to be a great deal of interdependence and cooperation between the two states on issues of regional concern. These issues include: security, transportation, commerce, agriculture, tourism, natural resources, archeology, and public health. Let's try to take a realistic view of issues that may arise with the establishment of a Palestinian state and how they may be addressed by the nascent state. There are many questions which come to mind, of which the following list is only the beginning:

Mutual Cooperation. Have any of the Palestinian groups given any indication in their words or deeds that they are ready to accept and cooperate with a Jewish State of Israel in any borders at all? Are there any indications that the establishment of a Palestinian State will be followed by the cessation of terrorist tactics against the State of Israel. Can we be confident that terrorism and conflict will replaced by an amicable atmosphere of acceptance, tolerance, and negotiated compromise? Have the Palestinians said or done anything to suggest that? So far they haven't given any indication of accepting a Jewish State of Israel with any boundaries.

Commerce and Currency. Both Israel and a neighboring Palestinian state would depend on an exchange of goods between the two states. That includes manufactured and agricultural goods, as well as human resources. Will the checkpoints that exist now be reduced or could they even be expanded to include both Palestinian and Israeli checkpoints at the borders? Will commercial vehicles be used to smuggle contraband goods and illegal arms? Will there be free trade or a system of tariffs and taxes on the goods. What kind of security will there be at the border crossings? How easy or difficult will it be for merchants to exchange goods between the two states? What kind of currency will be used?

Passports and Visas. An independent Palestinian state will have the ability to issue passports and visas. Can we feel confident that passports won't be issued to trained terrorists who want to export their skills to comrades in other countries? Since the Gaza Strip is so readily accessible by land, sea, and air, can we be confident that the Gaza Strip won't be used as a safe haven for international criminals who are trying to escape from Interpol or the FBI? Today the Gaza Strip has become a haven for terrorists, kidnappers, and arms smuggling. Why should we expect anything different?

Security and Weapons. A sovereign Palestinian state would have the right to purchase weapons for security and defense. Can we be confident that the Palestinians will do that in a responsible manner so that explosive materials and sophisticated weapons don't get into the hands of criminals and terrorists? Will the Palestinians be able to maintain a system of security and justice within their own borders? Who will security officers and judges be accountable to?

Natural Resources. Fresh water and energy sources are scarce in that part of the world. Will the Palestinians and Israelis work amicably together to conserve, develop, and distribute valuable water resources? How will they determine placement of pipelines and cables? How will they ensure that both countries get an adequate supply of water, oil, and electricity? Will they work together to utilize alternative forms of energy? What kind of security will be provided for pipelines, cables, and reservoirs?

Transportation. The Palestinians will probably want to construct airports, seaports, and highways. Can we be assured that they will do that with concern for security and environmental protection? Will the Palestinians show respect for archeological, historical, and religious sites in their construction plans? Let's take an example of a transportation issue that could feasibly arise with the establishment of a Palestinian State. Israel's Ben-Gurion International Airport is only a short distance from Palestinian areas. What would happen if an El-Al pilot has to circle over Palestinian airspace in a period of heavy air traffic or poor weather conditions? Is it possible that a surface to air missile will shoot up from Palestinian territory to destroy the plane and kill all 400 passengers? The Palestinians will immediately call a press conference and say, "We're really sorry that we shot down the plane, we didn't mean it. Our radar operator reported a military craft violating our airspace. We dismissed the radar operator and this will never happen again." In the meantime, 400 Jews were killed and travel to Israel will grind to a halt. Let's say the reverse situation occurs. The Palestinians build an airport on the Gaza Strip, a short distance from Tel Aviv. Israeli security officials will probably insist that all take-off and landing patterns be directed away from Israeli population centers. One day, Israeli radar detects a commercial jet over international waters in the Mediterranean heading straight for Tel Aviv. It is conceivable that the pilot had a legitimate need to modify his landing pattern because of air traffic, weather conditions, or a medical emergency on board. Israeli security officials will have only minutes to establish communication with the pilot to be sure that he has no malicious intent. If they can't do that, do they shoot down a commercial jet over international waters and kill a few hundred civilians, or do they allow the plane to continue on a possible mission of enormous death and destruction? That's a decision that not even King Solomon would want to make. Can we really trust the Palestinians to use transportation facilities in a responsible manner?

Tourism. Tourists who wish to visit the Holy Land will probably want to visit Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron, Jericho, Nazareth, and Tiberias, all within driving distance from each other. Will Palestinians cooperate with Israelis to allow tourists of all faiths to have free access to these areas? What kind of security will be provided for tourist buses? What happens when the bus has to travel from Israeli to Palestinian areas? Will buses be able to travel directly from Jerusalem to Hebron or from Jericho to Tiberias, or will they have to take some lengthy, circuitous route for security reasons? Will it be possible to take a Jerusalem-Hebron-Massada-Dead Sea tour as it is now? Will Palestinians and Israelis work together to encourage tourism and commerce or will antagonistic policies discourage tourists from visiting holy sites?

Public Health. Can the Palestinians be trusted to address the health needs of their own population? Will children receive their inoculations? Will geriatric needs be addressed? Will Palestinian health officials cooperate with their Israeli counterparts? Suppose an atypical epidemic breaks out in Israel. It could be a tropical disease such as West Nile Fever, or it could be bio-terrorism. Will Palestinian officials provide access to Israeli health officials to investigate the source of infection or will they make it more difficult? Will Palestinains cooperate with Israelis to control the epidemic or will Israelis have to examine birds and mosquitoes at checkpoints?

Archeological, religious, and historical sites. Can we trust the Palestinians to respect and preserve the holy sites of all religions? Will there be free and secure access for all religions? Suppose the Palestinians are building new housing in Jericho and come across some artifacts from the biblical era. Will they call Israeli archeologists at Hebrew University and say, "We discovered some materials that may be of interest to you, would you like to come and examine them?" Or, will they attempt to erase any signs of Jewish history in the area?

Agricultural Methods. Both states will probably want to grow the same crops and animals for food. Will there be cooperation in the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides or will there be interference? Will there be proper controls for animal-borne diseases and genetic breeding?

There are many more such questions. Yes, it's true that most of them could be resolved through negotiation and compromise. But if the Arabs would be willing to negotiate and compromise then there wouldn't be a conflict and there wouldn't be any need to develop another Arab state in a region that already has 22 Arab states.

So what are the possible alternatives? A one-state solution wouldn't work either because eventually it would result in the dissolution of the Jewish state by demography and democracy. So that suggests that the only solution for now would be a reasonable compromise between a two-state and one-state solution. That could be accomplished through a federated arrangement, similar to the arrangement between the United States and Puerto Rico. There are few Puerto Ricans that are complaining that they have been "suffering from a lengthy occupation." That's because they are benefiting from their relationship ship with the United States, so there is no need to make significant changes.

The same argument can be made for Palestinians and Israelis. If it can be demonstrated to the Palestinian people, not their fanatical leaders, that they will benefit from a federated connection with the State of Israel, then it could be adopted, even if only as an interim solution. There are many forms of federal government which can be considered. Almost any of them would be preferable to having two separate sovereign micro-states. That would not resolve the conflict or "alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people." It would only create more problems and conflicts.

Those that are really concerned about the "plight of the Palestinians" should abandon the fantasy of a two-state solution and work at developing a realistic federation of an autonomous Arab entity that would operate in a loose union with the State of Israel. It could be based on a model similar to Puerto Rico or other existing forms of federations. Almost any of these would be preferable to a two-state solution and would allow the Palestinian people to benefit from the technical, agricultural, and medical accomplishments of the State of Israel. The Palestinians would only suffer more if they had their own autonomous, fragmented micro-state in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. But if they can't accept being a minority population within a Jewish federation, then they still have 20 Arab Sunni Muslim countries to go to where they can be part of the majority population.

It's time to dismiss the fallacy of a two-state solution and promote a more realistic, sensible solution. American and European diplomats are not facilitating a peaceful resolution to the conflict by promoting deceptive solutions.

Contact Israel Zwick at israel.zwick@earthlink.net or go to his website:
http://cnpublications.net/. This article is archived at
http://cnpublications.net/2006/10/27/reexamining-the-two-state-solution/

To Go To Top

FINANCING THE ENEMY IS TREASON; PROPOSAL FROM THE ASYLUM; ABOLISH THE PA IN THE WEST BANK
Posted by Steven Shamrak, January 28, 2007.

Financing the Enemy is Treason.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pressured Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert into giving up to US$100 million to PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas. Now, however, PA Minister of Planning Samir Abu Aisha has stated that the Hamas organization will be fully involved in handing out the cash. Doing so makes a mockery of Olmert's assurances and will help bolster Hamas popularity.

Until now, Arabs never kept their word or honoured any agreement they had signed with Israel. In spite of this, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has reportedly been secretly bargaining away the final and irreversible surrender of most of Judea and Samaria to murderous 'Palestinians'! This mentally tormented and disabled person is in charge of Israel and nothing is being done to remove him from office. Olmert has no self-respect nor respect for the right of the Jews to their ancestral land!

Food for Thought.

Exposing the ugliness of current reality and calling for directional change toward the achievement of original Zionist goals is not disloyalty to Israel. Perpetuation of apathy, not exposing the stupidity of the current Israeli government and not helping some Israeli voters realize their mistake is.

Outcry of a Rabbi. Chief rabbi of Tzfat and son of Israel's former chief rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, has issued a serious call for 100 "brave volunteers" to lead Israel 's return to Gaza. "We need to take the initiative, we need to return to Gush Katif," Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu wrote. "It's time to save the country from the corrupt ones, the followers of Ariel Sharon."

Protection of 'Palestinians' in Iraq. The UN refugee agency has asked the Iraqi government and the US-led coalition forces to provide protection to about 20,000 Sunni Muslims who claim Israel as their homeland in Iraq. Shi'ite Muslims have killed more than 600 Sunnis. Iraqi police said many of the victims were tortured with electric drills.

PM calls for Katsav's Resignation. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Wednesday evening called for the resignation of President Moshe Katsav, who is facing possible indictment of rape. Olmert made the call at the Herzliya Conference (Why, with so many pending corruption accusations, does not Olmert follow the same advice?)

Proposal from Asylum. Member of the Israeli Knesset Parliament, Prof. Shlomo Breznitz of the Kadima Party, a close associate of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, has offered a plan that would hand over the administration of Judea, Samaria and Gaza to a European task force until the establishment of a Palestinian state. The plan would involve destroying most of the Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, as Jewish communities were destroyed in the Katif sector of Gaza. (When has Israel relinquished her independence? When have the Europeans done anything good for Jews?)

Quote of the Week.

"IDF -- which buried its soul in the sands of Gush Katif... In the sands of Gush Katif, Israel completely lost its goal. Without a goal, it is impossible to win." -- by Moshe Feiglin.

Items.

The High Level of Government Corruption. Globes business news editor Hagai Golan said at the Herzliya Conference that 86 percent of the country believes that wealthy businessmen control the government. He stated that this "leaves no room for doubt -- we live in a corrupt country." He said that although the wealthy elite in Israel are important for the country's national strength, "they should not be above the national enforcement bodies -- this is the root of much of the problem." "What went wrong is Israel's leadership echelon. The Israeli public is an extraordinary one, but the Israeli elites have lost their way through the decades. Our political elite has become unfit..."

Two-state Solution no Solution. Former IDF Chief of Staff Major-General Moshe Ya'alon said that "two-state solution" championed by the Bush administration is "irrelevant" and will not bring peace and stability to the Middle East. Dr. Dan Schueftan, of Haifa University's, described as "a senior Israeli academic," said that Israeli-Arab leaders recently released a document calling for "nothing short of the destruction of Jewish national state."

Persecution of Jews in Yemen. Yemenite Muslims have terrorised around 45 local Jews into fleeing their homes. A Saudi Arabian newspaper reported that the Jews were accused of "serving global Zionism" and given 10 days to abandon their property or face abductions and theft. (Business as usual -- No international outcry!)

Hiding Political Stupidity. The State Prosecutor said that opening the Winograd Commission, which was established to investigate mistakes made in last summer's war with Hezbollah, findings to the public could create a security risk. (Deportation of 8500 Jews from Gaza was not "a security risk"? Great democracy!)

How Many Goverments does Israel Have? Israel's defense minister, Amir Peretz -- leader of Labor, unveiled his own 3 steps plan for peace with the Arab Palestinians. 1. The sides would declare a comprehensive cease-fire. 2. Abbas would dismantle Palestinian terrorist groups and the sides would move toward an agreement on a Arab Palestinian state within temporary borders. 3. A new permanent Arab state to be established alongside Israel. (Once again, he has shown how delusional and power hungry he is!)

Jewish Contribution to Humanity. Arno Allan Penzias (born April, 1933) is an German born American physicist and a co-winner of the 1978 Nobel Prize in physics for identifying the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB), the radio remnant of the Big Bang. At age six he fled to Britain as part of the Kindertransport (the rescue mission that took in nearly 10,000 predominantly Jewish children from Nazi Germany, and the occupied territories. The children were placed in British foster homes, hostels, and farms.)

What is in a Name? Jenin central square is renamed "Saddam Hussein" square. The residents have begun collecting donations for the construction of a special monument in memory of Saddam.

Arab Convert Arrested. An Arab who converted to Judaism and moved from the PA to Haifa was indicted for conspiring with the enemy and contacting a foreign agent -- an Islamic Jihad terrorist. Assaf Ben-David, born Hussam Hafez Mahmoud Suafta, converted to Judaism and left the PA-controlled village of Tubas, near Shechem once he received Israeli citizenship. He recently returned to Islam after living for years as a Hareidi-religious Jew and is accused of trying to pass materials for manufacturing explosives. (Not many "Righteous Coverts" are around! Marriage, Israeli citizenship is not the legitimate reasons for Conversion.)

Brotherly Love. Arabs, who the UNHCR refers to as Palestinian -- though most are far younger than the State of Israel, forcibly expelled from their homes in Iraq are stranded in a no-mans land as both Syria and Jordan refuse to accept them.

New Anti-Missile Drone. Israel soon to launch new anti-missile drone, which will be able to identify, intercept and destroy ballistic missiles as they are launched from the ground. (Would it be easier to destroy those sites with ballistic missiles on the ground, instead of creating the feeling of false security?)

NATO in Gaza -- Strategic Planning Minister Avigdor Lieberman raised the idea of deployment of 30,000 NATO peacekeepers in Gaza, during talks with Condoleeza Rice. (As a sovereign country, Israel has long resisted calls for foreign troops to be posted in Gaza and the West Bank, Jewish Land! When Will Idiocy Stop?)

Legacy of 'Useless Nothing'. United Nations peacekeepers in Sudan have been accused of raping children as young as 12. Following an investigation, Britain's Daily Telegraph claims to have gathered accounts of 20 cases of sexual abuse by UN personnel in southern Sudan. It says hundreds of children may have been abused. (Add to it: the undwilliness to prevent genocide in Ruanda, rapes and abuse of civilians in the Congo and the spread of AIDS by UN personal.)

Abolish PA in West Bank as the First Step...

The Hamas-led Palestinian Authority and its prime minister is openly calling for the destruction of Israel, and therefore Israel should dissolve the P.A and ship its leaders off to the Gaza Strip, an Israeli lawmaker is recommending. "After 13 years of incitement and violence and terrorism and agreement violations, one should say that enough is enough. It is high time [that Israel] should abolish the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria [ West Bank] and transfer the leadership (and Arab population) to Gaza," said Israeli lawmaker Yuval Steinitz. Steinitz said that entire West Bank should be under Israeli security control...(...and let them kill each other in Gaza for a while!)

Steven Shamrak was born in the former Soviet Union (USSR) and participated in the Moscow Zionist "refusenik" movement. For the last 3 years, he has been publishing internet editorial letters on the Arab-Israeli conflict -- independently, not as a member of any organization or political movement. He can be reached by email at StevenShamrak.e@gmail.com

To Go To Top

THE NEXT SET OF TRICKS BY ISRAEL'S CORRUPT GOVERNMENT
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 28, 2007.

By now we have all heard about a repeat of the secret Oslo pact wherein Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni, E.U. Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana and the ubiquitous Palestinian Authority secretly met to divest Israel of vital territory. This begins with Judea and Samaria, continues with the Golan Heights, the Jordan Valley and ends with all of Jerusalem controlled by Jordan for 19 years til 1967.

As in Olso, these government officials, in secret, met to decide the fate of the Jewish nation and the Jewish people with foreign governments -- Wannsee again.

It has been reported that Mahmoud Abbas met with Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres in Davos, Switzerland. (1) For Peres, this is his second act of what most nations call treason (at the least) besides Oslo. Peres is an old hand at representing the Left and subverting Israel to the benefit of Arab Muslim Palestinian hostiles.

Watch for the following game plan: Olmert, under investigation for a series of criminal acts. Hopefully, if he's indicted, he will have to step down in disgrace. Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, counseled by Shimon Peres, would then be handed the office of Prime Minister -- unless Peres claims it first. Actually, Peres is probably going to try (again) for the high ceremonial post of President after he (probably) had something to do with smearing and undermining President Moshe Katzav. He's very good at that. Either way the deal arranged with C. Rice and the U.S. State Department is to push through a "temporary" second state of Palestine in Judea, Samaria and Gaza.

This, of course, would require at the start, the immediate rolling "displacement" of 250,000 Jews -- much as was done with the Jews of Gush Katif and North Samaria. (By the way, surrendering the four Northern Samarian settlements exposed Israel to total vulnerability from hostile Arab Palestinian Muslims and their Katyushas into her heartland, Ben Gurion Airport, Haifa, Tel Aviv and all the other cities, towns and villages surrounding the Northern Samarian salient.) The fact is that neither Bush, Rice nor Olmert seem to give a damn that Hamas, with an Iranian and Syrian supply, will line Judea and Samaria with missiles -- just as Hezb'Allah has done in Northern Israel from Lebanon.

Once this duplicitous act is on the books, then U.N. Peacekeepers (including the Quartet military personnel) will be introduced to "Keep the Peace". This shall place NATO and Russia in charge of the Middle East and the Jewish State of Israel. Will that do Israel or America any good? What will happen to Israel's sovereignty, security, safety, and refuge for the Jewish people? It will evaporate!

These U.N./NATO Peacekeepers will, as before, offer any number of useless forces who, as in the past, and now in Southern Lebanon, proved to be collaborators with Hezb'Allah and Arab Muslim Lebanese Terrorists.

Presently in Lebanon, Hezb'Allah has ordered UNFIL (United Nations Interim Forces in Lebanon) off all main roads and, as expected, those Peace Forces obeyed. A repeat of the time in mid-May 1967 when Gamal Abd' El- Nasser order the U.N. Peacekeepers out of the Sinai. They meekly obeyed as Nasser also closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping (again as he had in 1956). In international law this is a Casus Belli, initiating the 1967 Six Days War.(2)

Shimon Peres who lost the election to Katzav for the post of President, is expected to try again for that post. If Peres succeeds, he will turn that largely ceremonial post to one of influence. In effect, Peres will be working with (or for) the U.S. State Department representing a foreign government, to enable either Olmert of Livni to push through the plan for a "temporary" second State of Palestine and the forced removal of the Jewish citizens of Judea and Samaria (continuing Israel's surrender of control to the Muslim Arabs).

There is little doubt that the Leftist Media and their cohorts (the Leftist Supreme Court) are deep into planning this putsch. It's not a matter of overthrowing a Leftist Government but rather keeping it in their grasps by overthrowing the Israeli people and the Jewish nation. It's an unusual coup d'etat but it is a conquest from within by corrupt officials who know how to manipulate the system.

This can be averted IF the Government is overthrown and the plotters are removed. There are many decent candidate for the Prime Minister's Chair who have already shown their honestly.

Please keep in mind when black under-the-table dealings are in progress, there are winners, losers and the victims to be sold for slaughter.

The following outlines what the various side expect:

The State Department and the Bush Administration wish to claim some sort of victory for history by creating the fiction of a "peaceful" two-state solution.

The U.N. and the E.U., never friends of either the Jewish people and the Jewish State, would celebrate an imposed penalty on Israel. The U.N., U.S. and E.U. would hope for improved business flow from theoretically friendly and grateful Arab Muslims countries. Add to that, for this betrayal, the Muslims (hopefully) would lessen their pressures on Eurabia. (Only the Europeans -- perennial losers to any dictatorial force -- would believe or hope the Islamists would withdraw their Muslims or, at least, lessen their incoming migrations.)

Olmert, Livni, Peres, Mazuz, Peretz and the Left would have succeeded in imposing an expanded Oslo across the center of the nation. They would ignore the thousands of missiles fired by Hezb'Allah at Northern Israel as well as the increasing range and accuracy of the Kassam Rockets from the then Judenrein Gaza Strip. By evacuating the center of the country to the Muslim Arab Palestinians, Hezb'Allah, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Fatah would have an easy firing position to reach ALL of Israel from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

While Olmert, Livni, the Kadima Party and the Left would deny betraying the nation, after the first salvo into Tel Aviv, nevertheless, the nation (even the Left) would scream treason and, no doubt, demand to hang the perpetrators. Granted, it would be satisfying but, too late for the victims of this treachery.

In the interim, foreign troops would have been invited into Gaza, Judea and Samaria as supposed Peace-Keepers by Olmert or his replacement, Livni. Moreover, through the black, under-the-table deals the government would have relinquished her right to the Land given by G-d to the Jewish people forever. Thus, they would have legitimized permission given the foreign forces to force all Jews out of Judea and Samaria.

Pushing Israel off of the Golan Heights would please the Syrians and give the U.S. leverage to claim the position of Israel's protector from the Heights above from where Syria used to lob missiles and bombs into the Jewish communities from 1948 to 1967.

This would be accomplished by building a super American air and ground base on the Golan, with the permission of the grateful Syrians. Israel's role under Olmert, Livni, Peres and Mazuz has been to negotiate with Syria under State Department supervision and control. They have already made the claim that it will all be just a big "Park". (Yes, I said a big "Park" which is the agreed disinformation title to be used.)

Here again, the Jews, both civilian and military, would be forcibly removed. The Syrians would be grateful to America for removing the Israelis electronic observation posts on Mt. Hermon and Mt. Dov, allowing Israel to monitoring possible Syria's military activity. At the moment, Syria cannot start up a tank, fire up a jet and watch for any loading up of missiles without Israel being alerted. The U.S. says they will keep watch -- on Israel's behalf -- which is why the word "Disinformation" was coined.

President Bush would like to strike Iran's nuclear capability before it becomes operational. There is some hope by the U.S. that Iran will strike at Israel, thus giving an excuse to hit Iran with cruise missiles and tactical nukes. If Israel was eliminated, she would be looked upon as expendable but necessary collateral damage.

But, either way, Bush will attempt to placate the Arab/Muslim nations by forcing Israel to allow the creation of what the State Department knows will be a Terrorist State. Should Olmert and his collaborators, plus the State Department, in linkage with the E.U. and U.N., succeed in divesting Israel of Judea and Samaria, it will create an Islamists' arc from Iran, through Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, the Palestinian West Bank, through Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia, on to Libya, Sudan, Algeria, Ethiopia. Naturally, the Gulf States of Kuwait, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi would fall into line -- all to create a necklace of the Muslim States' Crescent, which would become a deadly threat to the Free West and the Third World developing countries. That poisonous necklace would also control all Middle Eastern oil.

The Middle East, under an Iranian nuclear umbrella, would become the start of a massive Islamic World-wide Caliphate under Sharia Law as envisioned by the Ayatollahs and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. All this is intended to satisfy the historical legacy of one small President and a State Department who hates the Jewish State.

As for Israel, she could save herself but, given the fact her electorate, usually misled by the Leftist Media, most often selects a Leftist dedicated to de-Judaizing the nation, she may not be able to save herself.

Now, let's explore the slogan "Road Map" which brought Israel to where she presently stands. First, there was, of course, the Oslo Accords, where Rabin, Peres and Beilin colluded with the Norwegians to give away 7 Israeli cities to Yassir Arafat's control. Israel's reward was murder from day-to-day while the State Department paid Arafat's Billions. Each of those cities turned into a terrorist base and its perpetrators got away without being hung.

There were the Wye Plantation meetings where a (sadly) weak-spined Binyamin (Bibi) Netanyahu managed to give up 80% of Hebron which quickly filled up with Arab Muslim Palestinian terrorists.

We jump ahead to an addled, demented Sharon and his shady advisor Ehud Olmert, who gave up Gush Katif in the Gaza Strip, so the divided Palestinians (Fatah and Hamas) could turn it into a fire base growing weekly.

Then we found that the great Sharon allowed Hezb'Allah to build a missile launching area with 20,000 Katyusha missiles for six years. They launched 4,000 into Northern Israel, killing hundreds of Jewish civilians and soldiers, until the U.S. State Department, the U.N. manage to halt the firing. The Lebanese Army and the U.N. Peacekeepers were supposed to disarm Hezb'Allah and pacify Southern Lebanon. But, they didn't! In fact, they were just ordered off all the main roads by Hezb'Allah and they left.

So, what did Rice, Bush, Olmert and Livni learn? Apparently nothing. Well, Hamas and Fatah are in a war to control Gaza -- something like Beirut under Arafat. Hezb'Allah has launched a war against the Lebanese Government and are rioting in the streets -- all this while Rice, Bush, Olmert, Livni are ready to turn Israel into Beirut.

The Bush plans for winning the hearts and minds of Iraqis just didn't work. The Arab Muslim Terrorists (Mujahideen) came from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Syrian, etc. to kill U.S. soldiers. No hearts and minds won here!

In Afghanistan the Taliban, having subjugated the nation were driven out momentarily along with Osama Bin Laden -- probably into the mountains and across the border to Pakistan. They are presently re-organized and are attacking U.S. and U.N. troops.

Somehow Bush, Rice and even the Saudi representatives have miscalculated the mind-set of the Arab Muslims.

While Israel was the only nation competently fighting Islamic terrorists along comes the Arabist State Department and the Bush family to demand Israel stop fighting terror except with restraint.

Having almost lost in Iraq, Bush has finally allowed the U.S. soldiers to shoot Iranians in Iraq. He still won't bomb Syria for assisting terrorists into Iraq. Perhaps their friend in Washington, James Baker III, just won't let Bush hit Syria. You did know Syria had friends in high places in Washington.

Now C. Rice, in cahoots with Olmert, Livni, Solana are hustling Israel into sacrificing her very life by putting Palestinian missiles quite close to Tel Aviv. In what Israel is supposed to hand over to Abbas (Judea and Samaria). That's called the two state solution under the Road Map or otherwise known as the Muslims' "Final Solution to their Jewish Question."

As this crowd of Arabists in Washington tries to butter up Saudi Arabia and the like, even as the Muslim Islamists are kicking the hell out of the world.

We see the Hezb'Allah and Lebanese are at each other's throats again reminiscent of the killings in Beirut under Arafat where he created a 12 year Civil War in Lebanon which killed 100,000 Muslims and Christians.

Why must we plunge onward, knowing the character of the Arab, the Muslims, the Islamists? Destroying Israel and plunging what remains of World Jewry into despair will not save your legacy, Mr. Bush. You have, as your family before you, chosen the wrong side and, unfortunately, all of America must suffer and pay for your mistakes.

###

1. "Abbas Meets Israel's Foreign Minister" MidEast Daily News January 26, 2007

2. "Egypt: A Brief History -- From Ancient Times to the Modern Period" MidEast Web

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

DID YOU KNOW THESE FACTS ABOUT JONATHAN POLLARD?
Posted by Justice For Jonathan Pollard (Justice4JP), January 28, 2007.
This was written by Esther Pollard, Jonathan Pollard's wife. It appeared in Makor Rishon
( http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2007/012607a.htm) January 26, 2007. It was translated to English By Justice4JP.
  • My husband, Jonathan Pollard, is an Israeli agent in captivity, currently completing his 22nd year of a life sentence for his service to the security of The State of Israel.

  • The information that Jonathan provided to Israel included Iranian, Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian nuclear, chemical, and biological warfare capabilities -- all being developed for use against Israel. He also provided information on ballistic missile development by these countries and information on up-coming terrorist attacks planned against Israeli civilian targets.

  • Israel was legally entitled to this vital security information according to a 1983 Memorandum of Understanding signed by both countries. But the information was deliberately being withheld from Israel as the result of an illegal intelligence embargo implemented by former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and former Deputy Director of the CIA Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, whose pro-Arab tilt did not jibe with declared US foreign policy.

  • In the beginning Jonathan volunteered his services and only later did he become a bona fide agent on behalf of the State of Israel. His zeal to save Israeli lives was his sole motivation. Even the sentencing judge -- who was no friend of the case -- recognized that Jonathan was an ideologue, not a mercenary, and therefore declined to impose a monetary fine.

  • From the time that Jonathan was first arrested in 1985, Israel denied all ties to him, and cooperated fully with the American prosecution to secure a life sentence for him.

  • For its own shameful reasons the American Jewish leadership endorsed and perpetuated Israel's lies. On March 10, 1987 -- six days after my husband was sentenced to Life in complete violation of a plea agreement which Jonathan honored and the US abrogated -- the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations sent a letter to the US State Department promising never to interfere on his behalf. The Conference has kept that promise with religious zeal. (A copy of their letter, obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, appears on our web site --
    http://www.jonathanpollard.org/2002/111802.htm.)

  • Despite the passage of 22 years and innumerable opportunities, Israel's lies continue to govern this case, and effectively to keep Jonathan in prison.

  • Israel cravenly handed over to the US all of the evidence that was used against Jonathan. Without this evidence, the US had no case, and would have been forced to set him free.

  • In betraying Jonathan and by handing over the evidence, Israel earned for itself the dishonorable distinction of becoming the first and only country in the history of modern espionage ever to assist in the indictment and prosecution of its own agent!

  • Israel paid the lawyer who secured a life sentence for Jonathan, without benefit of trial. The median sentence for the offense Jonathan had committed was 2 to 4 year sentence -- not Life!

  • This was the same lawyer, paid by the Government of Israel, who failed to file a simple Notice of Intent to Appeal, forever depriving Jonathan of his right to appeal his Life sentence.

  • By contrast, to this day Israel has steadfastly refused to pay a cent to the lawyers who, unlike the above-mentioned lawyer, are trying to help Jonathan to secure his release from prison.

  • Even though Jonathan fought and succeeded in forcing the State of Israel to officially acknowledge him as her agent, the State's attitude towards him and its resolute abandonment of him has not changed at all in 22 years.

  • The State of Israel has never taken the most minimal steps -- legal, moral, or diplomatic to secure Jonathan's release.

  • To this day, Israel has never officially informed the White House, the Justice, Intelligence or State Departments that Jonathan is an Israeli agent and that Israel intends to seek his release. Consequently the American Justice Department continues to regard him only as a common criminal, not as an Israeli agent, and to treat him accordingly.

  • To this day the State of Israel has never sought the assistance of American congressmen or senators on Jonathan's case, and for 2 decades it has calculatedly avoided engaging AIPAC or any other effective lobby organization on his behalf.

  • In 22 years Israel has never done any hasbara for the public in Israel or in the US to explain its position on Jonathan's case or to promote his release -- as it routinely does to explain every other matter of importance to the State.

  • For 22 years, the State of Israel has deliberately attempted to prevent the Israeli public from knowing about Jonathan. A good indicator of the Government's attitude towards Jonathan is reflected in the Ministry of Education's refusal to include his plight in the regular school curriculum. The Ministry of Education Library and Archives (which teachers use for research) contains absolutely no information whatsoever about Jonathan! Not a single reference!

  • When Jonathan's former handler, Rafi Eitan, ran for Knesset earlier this year, it put the lie to the Government's long-standing claim that pressing for Jonathan's release might somehow damage Israel's relationship with the US. Indeed the Government of Israel demonstrated no compunction whatsoever about possible damage to US-Israel relations or to Jonathan's situation when immediately upon his election, it appointed Rafi Eitan as a minister

  • The Government's appointment of Eitan as minister was done with the full knowledge that the Americans regard Eitan as an unindicted co-conspirator in the affair and that he had played a key role in the betrayal of Jonathan Pollard, even providing false testimony to the Americans which had doomed Jonathan.

  • From the time Jonathan was first arrested, the only consistent "plan" Israel has ever had for his release is to bring him home in a coffin. This fact has been confirmed for us over and over again for the last 22 years by various officials and events.

  • Jonathan miraculously survived the first 7 years of his incarceration in solitary confinement, in barbaric conditions in a dungeon cell 3 stories underground at USP Marion and then waged his own battle -- without any help from the State of Israel -- to be moved to open population at FCI Butner.

  • Just shortly after his move to FCI Butner in the spring of 1993, Israel sent a Mossad agent to Jonathan on official business. Instead of presenting Jonathan with a plan for securing his release, the Mossad agent came armed with an official request that Jonathan kill himself. "Committing suicide," Jonathan was informed, would "solve the Pollard problem" for the State of Israel.

  • The Israeli policy which wants to bring Jonathan Pollard home in a coffin, G-d forbid, continues to this day, and illuminates the Israeli Government's calculated consistency in missing every opportunity to secure Jonathan's release.

  • Instead, successive Governments of Israel have routinely exploited Jonathan's name and his plight, using it as a sweetener to sell unpopular unilateral concessions to the Israeli public. But when crunch time comes, Jonathan is always dropped from every deal and painful unilateral concessions to the enemy are made regardless. (Some examples include the Hebron Accords, the Wye Accords, and most recently the Disengagement from Gaza and northern Samaria).

  • In Washington it is an open secret that Jonathan's sentence is grossly disproportionate and purely political. This was confirmed in a 2002 interview with former Secretary of Defense, the late Caspar Weinberger. Weinberger openly admitted that Jonathan's case was a "minor matter" that had been exaggerated out of all proportion to serve another political agenda. The opening that this admission created to secure Jonathan's release was totally ignored.

  • Similarly Dennis Ross, the former US Special Envoy to the Middle East, stated in his book "The Missing Peace" (published in 2004) that Jonathan deserves to be freed unconditionally. Nevertheless, writes Ross, Pollard is far too valuable as a bargaining chip against Israel, so he advised the president at Wye not to release him. Still no response from Israel.

  • In point of fact, Israel has already "paid" for Jonathan's release several times over (including freeing 750 murderers and terrorists with blood on their hands as part of the Wye Accords), but has never bothered to collect its due.

  • In the 22 years that Jonathan has been in prison, he has repeatedly been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment and severe affliction. The Government of Israel has been informed of each and every episode of mistreatment of its agent but has never once intervened on his behalf, nor has the Government ever protested.

  • Jonathan's first court appearance in the US in 2 decades took place in the year 2003. Israel did not even bother to send a representative. Instead, on the eve of Jonathan's court hearing, Israel's consular representative in New York who was given the task of officially responding to the media, slandered Jonathan on American national television thus sending a clear message to the judge that Jonathan is "hefker" and that no one in Israel cares what is done with him.

  • Israel's intent never to bring Jonathan home alive, is reflected in the immoral and mean-spirited way that the State relates to me, his wife.

  • As the wife of an Israeli agent, the fact that I remain homeless and penniless speaks volumes about the State's attitude towards Jonathan.

  • Compare this with the case of an Israeli drug dealer, a family friend of a Prime Minister, who was taken captive while pursuing his own illicit interests, and not in the service of the State. Both his wife and his mistress and their two respective families received full support for the duration of his captivity. I on the other hand, receive no help whatsoever and am dependent for my survival on the kindness of a few friends.

  • Moreover, I am cancer survivor. I have no medical insurance and I receive no medical assistance whatsoever from the State of Israel. In fact, when I recently tried to buy basic medical coverage on my own, I was rejected by Kupat Cholim. The manner in which I was rejected strongly suggested that they were fearful that accepting Pollard's wife might somehow jeopardize the Kupah's government funding.

  • Compare this also with the Government's recent gesture to the citizens of Lebanon offering them free medical treatment in Israel in spite of their possible participation in the recent war against Israel. An enemy alien can receive medical assistance in Israel, but the wife of an Israeli agent in captivity cannot!

  • Worse still, the Government brazenly lies to the Supreme Court and to the Israeli public when it repeatedly claims to be supporting Jonathan and me financially. We presented documented proof to State Comptroller Judge Micha Lindenstrauss that in 22 years, neither Jonathan nor I have ever received a cent from the Government of Israel.

  • The bottom line is that for 22 years, the State of Israel has stubbornly denied granting Jonathan any status that would bring him or his wife any assistance, or relief, or the possibility of securing his release.

  • Even though Jonathan fought for and obtained official recognition as an agent, his name does not appear on the Ministry of Defense's list of captives, thus depriving him of all of his rights as an agent in captivity.

  • The State also refuses to grant him status as a Prisoner of Zion, again depriving him of any rights that might accrue and, more importantly, depriving him of the protections this status would afford him.

  • By denying Jonathan status within the official framework governed by the Ministry of Defense (as a Shavui); or by the Internal Affairs Ministry (as a PoZ); the State of Israel has relegated Jonathan to the status of a person who does not officially exist and who therefore, can effectively be ignored to death.

For additional information see also at www.jonathanpollard.org:

  • The Facts Page

  • The Information Page

  • The Wye Double-Cross Page

  • Jonathan and the Judge: A Final Chapter in the Pollard Case? -- Text of Esther Pollard's Speech

  • FOIA Document: Conference of President's Letter to US State Dept

  • What No One Wants to Talk About (Re: Israel's failure to lobby at all for Pollard)

  • Caspar's Ghost -- (Interview with Weinberger admission that Pollard case was exaggerated out of all proportion) -- by Edwin Black

  • Excerpts From "The Missing Piece" by Dennis Ross

  • Terror in the US and The Jonathan Pollard Case

  • The Clemency Page

  • The Bagatz Page

  • Jonathan Pollard's Letter to the Families of the Captive Soldiers

Contact Justice4JP at Justice4JP@gmail.com or go to the website
http://www.jonathanpollard.org

To Go To Top

WASHPOST  REPORTER SAYS HEZBOLLAH NO LONGER TERRORIST ORGANIZATION -- IT HAS EVOLVED
Posted by Eye on the Post, January 28, 2007.

Friends:

We wanted you to see a rare example of a Post reporter overtly expressing the type of thought and opinion that often lies hidden beneath the surface of the Post's agenda driven, anti-Israel reporting. Not only does Mr. Kessler see events through a distorted prism, he selectively emphasizes some facts and culls out others in his effort to influence readers.

According to Washington Post reporter Glen Kessler, President Bush isn't giving Hezbollah the respect it deserves. (President's Portrayal of 'The Enemy' Often Flawed, 1-24-07, A13) A group known to be responsible for multiple bombings, kidnappings, hijackings and murders, including attacks on a US embassy (17 dead), Marine barracks (241 Americans killed), and the 1992 and 1994 car bombings of the Israeli Embassy and Jewish Cultural Center in Buenos Aires (124 dead between the two bombings) has, in Mr. Kessler's estimation, "evolved." Now, Mr. Kessler says, it's just an "anti-Israeli militant organization:" He wrote:

"Similarly, Bush asserted that Shia Hezbollah, which has won seats in the Lebanese government, is a terrorist group "second only to al-Qaeda in the American lives it has taken." Bush is referring to attacks nearly a quarter-century ago on a U.S. embassy and a Marine barracks when the United States intervened in Lebanon's civil war by shelling Hezbollah strongholds. Hezbollah has evolved into primarily an anti-Israeli militant organization -- it fought a war with Israel last summer -- but the European Union does not list it as a terrorist organization."

Note Mr. Kessler's use of the phrase "nearly a quarter-century ago" to advance his opinion that Hezbollah has been rehabilitated. He even seeks to justify Hezbollah's US embassy bombing and bombing of the Marine barracks by blaming the United States for bringing on the attacks when it "intervened in Lebanon's civil war by shelling Hezbollah strongholds." What Mr. Kessler mischaracterizes as "intervention" by the US was actually the US's membership in the Multinational Peacekeeping Force in Lebanon in which the US, France, Italy and Britain sent troops to Lebanon in an effort to bring about an end to the civil war. Mr. Kessler forgets to mention that a French army barracks was also bombed by Hezbollah 20 seconds after the US Marine Barracks, killing 58 French soldiers.

The car bombings of the Israeli Embassy and the Jewish Cultural Center in Argentina were only 12 and 14 years ago, not a quarter century ago, so Mr. Kessler simply ignores them. And he conveniently forgets to mention that this past summer's war between Israel and Hezbollah was started by the unprovoked cross border attack, kidnapping and killing by Hezbollah of Israeli soldiers in Israel.

Mr. Kessler is quick to observe that the European Union has not listed Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, but he fails to inform readers that in a March 10, 2005 Resolution (NOT "nearly a quarter-century ago") the European Parliament voted 473-33 to blacklist the entire Hezbollah organization as terrorist.

Should Post readers trust anything Washington Post reporters say when they advance their agenda with nonsense such as this?

You are welcome to provide the Post with your opinion of the quality of its reporting about Israel.

Bo Jones, Publisher & Chief Executive Officer, The Washington Post, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC, 20071 (email: JonesB@washpost.com).

Donald Graham, Chairman, same street address (email: GrahamD@washpost.com).

Leonard Downie, Executive Editor, same street address (email address: DownieL@washpost.com)

Philip Bennett, Managing Editor, same street address (email address BennettP@washpost.com)

David Hoffman, Assistant Managing Editor for Foreign News, same street address (email address HoffmanD@washpost.com)

Keith Richburg, Foreign Editor, same street address (email address: RichburgK@washpost.com)

Deborah Howell, ombudsman, same street address (email address: ombudsman@washpost.com)

Please BCC feedback@eyeonthepost.org with your letters and email.

Eye On The Post, a grass roots organization monitoring the Washington Post's coverage of Israel and Jews. Their website address is http://www.eyeonthepost.org. To join, write feedback@eyeonthepost.org
To Go To Top

WHAT MOHAMMED'S BOYS JUST DID TO OUR PROPHET SAMUEL
Posted by Zalmi, January 28, 2007.

This weekend the Olmert cabinet approved the appointment of its first Arab cabinet minister.

What a magnanimous and grown-up gesture!

Something to get the doves in every Western legislature fluttering their wings in adulation.

The reward was not long in coming.

This is a picture from the tomb of our prophet Samuel. It and the ancient Jewish cemetery in Hebron were both ransacked and desecrated the same weekend.

Ghaleb Majadle was appointed Minister without Portfolio.

He may not have a portfolio, but his people clearly do.

That is to treat every act of humanity, magnanimity and trust as a sign of weakness and an invitation to kill and maim Jews everywhere and erase every vestige of Jewish existence in the Land of Israel.

We gave them land and rifles in Oslo and they repaid us with an Intifada.

We gave them autonomy and they repaid us with suicide bombers.

We released their terrorists and they sent them right back to kill again.

We withdrew from South Lebanon and they filled it with Iranian missile silos.

We gave up our prize-winning tomato fields in Gaza and they planted Katyushas.

We handed $100 million to Abbas only to see him kowtowing to Hamas's supreme leader.

We shipped Abbas 2,000 automatic rifles, 20,000 ammunition clips and 2 million bullets across the Karni crossing only to hear him repeat the same incitement against Israel.

Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

With the help of the UN's French peacekeepers, Hassan Nasrallah should easily be restocked with missiles and new human shields by this summer. When the new Iranian missiles start raining down, will our new Arab minister be welcome in the cabinet's bunker?

Contact Zalmi at his website: http://www.zalmi.net

To Go To Top

UK FORUM PROMOTES CHRISTIAN ZIONISM
Posted by Etgar Lefkovits, January 28, 2007.
This article was written by Etgar Lefkovits and it appeared today in the Jerusalem Post
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467832541&pagename=JPost%

Attempting to stem a tide of rising Islamic fundamentalism in Europe, a group of evangelical Christian leaders in Britain hosted a conservative Israeli conference in London on Sunday seeking to rekindle the historic but faded force of Christian Zionism in the United Kingdom.

The first-ever "Jerusalem Summit Europe," which was held at London's "Central Hall Westminster," brought together Israeli right-wing thinkers and members of the Knesset's increasingly influential Christian Allies Caucus with leaders of Britain's small pro-Israel evangelical community who feel increasingly threatened by the spread of radical Islam in Europe and in the UK.

"We are in a critical season and crossroads for Great Britain, which is a test case for the challenge of Islam," said Christine Darg, the head of the UK-based "Exploits Ministry" which organized the event.

"Now is the time to rekindle the almost unique relationship Britain has had with the Jewish people over the last couple hundred years."

The event, which was held nine decades after the landmark Balfour Declaration spelled out the British Government's support for a "national home" for the Jewish people in Palestine, and coincided with worldwide events marking the Holocaust, aimed to bring about a resurgence of Christian Zionism in the UK at a time when growing Islamic extremism is coupled with mainstream political correctness among many Christians, including Evangelicals, in a country still rife with replacement theology.

In an unusual turn of events, Israeli speakers at the event encouraged Christian revival based on Biblical beliefs, while members of the British Jewish community called for coordination among members of both faiths in supporting Israel and in lobbying the British Government on her behalf.

"The Bible is the real bridge between us," said the Chairman of the Christian Allies Caucus, MK Benny Elon (National Union-National Religious Party), the hawkish parliamentarian and rabbi who spearheaded Israel's ties with the evangelical world in his role as tourism minister.

"This basic connection should overcome the mistakes that have soured our historic relations in the past."

"The main message we are bringing is not a request to support Israel, but to support Christian revival in Europe -- not to save Israel, but to save yourself," said Dmitry Radyshevsky, the executive-director of "The Jerusalem Summit," a right-wing Jerusalem-based NGO which debuted four years ago, in an address that was marked by thunderous applause from the group of several hundred in the audience.

Radyshevsky, a Moscow-born Harvard Divinity school graduate, noted the irony that an Israeli Jew was calling for Christian revival in Europe, but said that it was part of a common struggle against radical Islam which required both Jews and Christians to believe in the moral right of their Bible-based values.

"Either it will be a fundamentally Christian Europe or a Europe of Islamic fundamentalists," he opined.

Labor MK Orit Noked, whose political views were 180 degrees to the left of the other participants in the conference, said that she was nevertheless consistently overwhelmed by the outpouring of support for Israel among the evangelical world.

"From a historical point of view, it is especially important that we are having this meeting here in London," Noked said.

The gathering, which received the blessing, if not the attendance, of Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who serves as the religious leader of the Church of England, also included a handful of British Jewish leaders who called for greater cooperation between the two communities in making their voices heard among British politicians.

"We are very much aware of your unfaltering support for the State of Israel, and your consistent and unfailing belief in the righteousness and return of the Jewish nation to its ancestral land," said Cyril Stein, a philanthropist and chairman of the non-profit "Go to Israel" tourist Campaign.

"You are not fair-weather friends, but consistent supporters through thick and thin," he added.

His remarks were unusual in that most British Jews, like their American counterparts, have traditionally distanced themselves from evangelical Christians due to conflicting world views on domestic issues, such as abortion and public prayer.

"Today the people of Israel are more aware than ever that it is Christians who have stood by our side through thick and thin, and Christians all over the world are more aware than ever before of what is at the stake...[which] is nothing less than our way of life, and the Judeo-Christian values upon which Western Civilization was built," said Caucus Director Josh Reinstein.

Still, the London event highlighted the major gap that that existed between the two countries, which the rise of Islamic extremism has helped to narrow.

"There is a whole new generation of Britons who have no concept of our heritage and ties with Israel, and all they hear in the popular press about Israel is negative, negative, negative, day in and day out," said Peter Darg, who heads the Christian Broadcasting Network in Europe.

"This is a clarion call to be Biblically-correct and not politically correct," Darg concluded.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

VERDICT ON AUSCHWITZ
Posted by Marion DS Dreyfus, January 28, 2007.

The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial 1963-65

Directed by Rolf Bickel and Dietrich Wagner. Perhaps the most detailed authentic documentary on the Holocaust since "Shoah." Three hours' running time. In German, with English subtitles. Color, B/W.

With such toxic weeds as Iran's Ahmadinajihad making a mockery of the Holocaust in, first, a cartoon "contest" and then a "scholars conference" that has smeared all those who attended (if they were not already tainted by their KKK or denial careerism), this film is a vast clinical salvo that provides documentation upon documentation to the significant archival footage and shelves of literature on this black epoch that defined genocide for all time. "Verdict" opens the eyes of even those deeply acquainted with the horror and unspeakable terrors of the war machine under the megalomanic hitler; it provides 3-hour wall-to-wall coverage of the crime trials of the 22 death generals outliving the "Thousand-Year" Reich, still residing in Germany, most in petit bourgeois lives of luxury and comfort.

The temperature of the screening room descends to subzero when the German defendants icily deny their warped culpability with the barest flicker of emotion. The cumulative effect of so much more authenticating footage and witness testimony cannot be overvalued: As the survivors pass into history, we must be wary of the agenda-driven rat vestiges such as the Iranian grocers and his fell assigns gambling on the ignorance and educational deficits of the newer generations who 'knew not Pharoah.' This is imperative viewing, even in the original German with subtitles.

It is the first German-language lenser this reviewer has seen without getting an initial lightning chill of referred fear at merely hearing the consonants of the language that murdered so myriad many of my people, and destroyed the naive notion that one 'could not' possibly eradicate an entire people in the supposedly modern age. Cartloads of the film should be airlifted to the muslim world and the fevered mullahcracies.

Contact Marion Dreyfus at dreyfusmarion@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

ISRAEL/PALESTINE CONFLICT: MISSING THE TREES FOR THE FOREST
Posted by Max Yas, January 27, 2007.

Kofi Annan, while Secretary-General of the UN, once said, " No other conflict carries such a powerful, symbolic, and emotional charge, even for people far away."

At the UN, a special commission, the UNWRA, deals only with Palestinian refugees; a single, separate commission looks after the rest of the tens of millions refugees world wide. No other conflict has its own International Solidarity Movement, nor gets as much attention from the media. These are facts that cannot be denied. They are, of course, the product of a vast propaganda machine paid for by Arab oil-billionaires.

To paraphrase Orwell, "All refugees are equal, but some are more equal than others".

The truth is that the Israel/Palestine conflict is a top priority only for Israel and the Palestinians.

Should the conflict end, Shi'ias and Sunis would not stop killing each other in Iraq; the war in Afghanistan would go on, as would the civil wars in Burma and Chechnya. Israel being "Wiped off the map" would not put an end to the persecution of Christians in Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines where many are killed and their churches burned. Neither Saddam's attack on Iran, which claimed over a million lives, nor his attack on Kuwait would have been deterred. Tibet would remain occupied by China, which is conducting religious and cultural genocide by shipping in train-loads of Chinese occupiers who may soon become the majority population.

A quick look at Africa: The tragedy of Darfur goes on, despite the numerous resolutions and ultimatums by the U.N. The slaughter and displacements in Uganda, Somalia, Sierra Leone, the Congo, where four million died as a result of the war since 1998 by killings and war-related starvation and disease, and other African states are each of greater magnitude than the Israel/Palestinian conflict.

An entire generation is being killed by HIV; 200,000 children are estimated to have been kidnapped and forced to be soldiers in the civil war; villagers have their limbs amputated en masse and the world is next to silent. Yet when one protester ignores warnings by the Israel Defence Force to get out of the way and gets crushed by a bulldozer, the entire world goes ape, the media has a feeding frenzy, and Israel gets rocketed by all-out propaganda.

Singling out Palestinian refugees for special treatment is counter-productive. While providing space to store weapons and explosives, these camps are producing suicide-bombers and jehadists who grow ever more aggressive

From "The Root Cause of Terrorism" (Joseph Farrah, WorldNetDaily):

"Do you know what I think is the root cause of terrorism? It works. Plain and simple. By that I mean those using terrorism in the world today do it because it achieves their objectives. Simple. And I think beyond dispute."

Terrorism works because the world encourages it by averting attention from the greatest danger in centuries by concentrating on one, rather small scale problem. Mr. Romney, former governor of Massachusetts, has said that Islamic jihadism is "the nightmare of this century."

The real problems the Arabs are experiencing are domestic and economic:

Arabs vs. Israel: A View from Pakistan (Farrukh Saleem, Jang Group-Pakistan)

Of the 330 million Muslims living under Arab rulers, a mere 486,530 [The number of Arab citizens in Israel is 1.2 million -- Mr. Saleem may be quoting the figure of Arab voters.] live in a democracy.

The only parliamentary democracy in the region, with universal suffrage, multi-party, multi-candidate, competitive elections, is Israel.

Knowledge makes Israel grow by 5% a year, while "rates of productivity" [overall] in Arab countries are negative. Israel now has six universities ranked as among the best on the planet, while the 22-member Arab League does not have a single university in the top 400.

In the Arab world, one in two women can neither read nor write.

Roughly 23% of Arab engineers and 50% of Arab doctors emigrate.

Appeasement is not the cure. Peace and hard work on their economy might be.

Shalom from Max

Contact Max Yas at maxyas@shaw.ca

To Go To Top

A PUBLIC RELATIONS OPPORTUNITY FOR ISRAEL
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 27, 2007.

A public relations window of opportunity presents itself to Israel, 'chosen' by much of the world, especially movers and shakers of the Middle Eastern Muslim world, to be its convenient scapegoat. Currently, a relative handful of imperiled so-called Palestinians, perhaps 600 or so, attempt to exit dysfunctional violent Baghdad, but 'good neighbor' Syria, for one, won't open its gates for these asylum seekers. "Of all the groups being targeted in Iraq, the Palestinians are the most vulnerable as they literally have nowhere else to flee, and in many cases have been denied travel documents," asserted Andrew Harper, Geneva-based senior Iraq operations manager. "The international community must act now to help these people. A safe haven needs to be found immediately, outside Iraq."

Brotherly love among Arabs apparently has its limits, especially when those 'kindred spirit' brothers wear the scarlet P. Indeed, wouldn't it be lovely if big bad presumed 'Palestinian occupier' Israel demonstrated to the world, especially the Muslim world, that it wasn't such a pariah state after all, and humanely airlifted those imperiled Sunni Arabs out of Iraq and into Israel? Wouldn't it be lovely if Israel showed up all the other Arab regimes by demonstrating that it cared more about so called Palestinian Arabs in trouble then they did? Once in Israel, of course, these newly arrived Sunni Arab visitors could be escorted to Gaza or perhaps their erstwhile homeland Jordan, presuming such Sunni Arab enclaves would welcome them. Even former U.S. President Jimmy Carter might grudgingly have a few kind words to say about an 'apartheid' nation, perhaps even conceding that Israel's citizens no longer deserved to be victims of homicidal/suicidal Arab martyrs.

Israel surely needs all the good publicity it can get, even from sanctimonious world leaders that to this day have not deployed a military force to stop the genocide of hapless Muslim Black Africans in the Darfur region of oil rich Sudan. Did I mention oil rich in describing a nation that happens to be ruled by Islamic sadists as well as happens to be a member of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights? Could oil be thicker than blood in the hearts and minds of those 'humanitarians' who condemn Israel at every opportunity? Never mind that, Israel is still better off when bloviators of benevolence worldwide, except when fossil fuel is an issue, offer kudos now and then. Furthermore, decent nations like Israel ought to engage in humane pursuits for their own sake.

An objective observer might note the aforementioned scarlet P, worn by 'abused' so called Palestinians, indeed abused by fellow Arabs who even refuse to give them refuge when needed, might very well stand for 'Pawns', the appropriate term for exploited Jordanians originally morphed by Yasser Arafat's PLO to an occupied tribe in order to make the Jewish State of Israel look bad as well as make Arafat a billionaire, but that's another story. If this was not so, Arab regimes, especially those rolling in petrodollars, would provide so called Palestinians with funds, and in the case of Jordan, would offer them land within its boundaries, in order to improve the wretched lives of these career refugees. Let us also observe that being a jerked around 'Pawn' can lead to many lapses in judgment, most notably electing the terrorist group Hamas to assume the role of Palestinian Pied Piper, leading that rag tag group of Arabs off the precipice of a cliff it gingerly straddled, crashing down into the abyss of catastrophe canyon below.

The thrust of all this, of course, is to make Israel look good in the eyes of the world, exposing fat-cat Arab autocrats for what they truly are. However, no matter how much hatred there is in the world, no matter how unfairly the State of Israel is treated, if indeed that 'chosen' state values moral behavior above all, it must rise above the rest of humankind if necessary and set an example by doing the right thing. Let the airlift begin!

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

BETHLEHEM CHRISTIANS SPEAK OUT ON PERSECUTION
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 27, 2007.

Dear Christian leaders,

The following is for anyone who still believes the Arab propaganda lies which accuse Israel of being the cause for the decline in Christian populations of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

As I have pointed out in earlier emails and articles, the Muslim terrorists and their supporters in the PA territories have been waging a low-level war of intimidation and threats agianst Christians ever since Arafat took over after the Oslo Accords in 1993. As Hamas grows stronger, the level of violence and persecution against Christians increases.

Under Jordanian rule, from 1948 to 1967, the Christian population of the West Bank declined slowly, but Christian majorities remained in Bethlehem, Bit Jalla, and a few other Christian villages. After the 6-day war, under Israel, the Christian population of the West Bank and Gaza Strip grew and thrived from 1967 to 1994. Shortly after Arafat took over, in 1994, the Christian flight began again, with many Palestinian Christians seeking refuge in Israel, where they could worship in peace and live openly as Christians without threats or intimidation. Today, Bethlehem, which was once 80% Christian, is only 15% Christian.

Unfortunately for the Christians of the West Bank, some of their own leaders have played the 'dhimmi' and provided the validating chorus of "righteous Christian voices" affirming the Arab propaganda claim that Israel is at cause for Christian flight. By regurgitating for western audiences the Arab lies that they themselves knew to be false, these leaders bore false witness against Israel and against their own people, your own brethren in Christ, in order to curry favor with Arafat, with the PLO, and now with Hamas.

And even more unfortunate for the Christians of the West Bank, a plethora of Christian leaders from the USA and UK have traveled to Israel to hob-knob with the terrorists, glad-hand the mass murderers, and press the flesh in obscene photo-ops with terrorist leaders who are directly at cause for the persecution and suffering of the Palestinian Christians. Such public actions by American Christian leaders, and their mendacious but rosy tales of Muslim-Christian amity, are also false witness against Israel and against your own brethren in Christ in the Holy Land.

I don't recall off-hand which of the commandments is "thou shalt not bear false witness"; but I'm sure that it is one of the Top Ten.

It may have been difficult for some Christians elsewhere to discern the truth about the Muslim persecution and intimidation and violence against Christians; especially when Bishops and Patriarchs in the West Bank were assailing Israel and dutifully betraying their own people by supporting the Arab mendacious propaganda. And especially when American Christian leaders came home from 'fact-finding trips' to regale their flock with more regurgitation of Arab lies.

But the article below should be adequate witness to the truth.

When the Muslim terrorists say: "el-yaum es-Sabbat, bas ghanem el-ahad" ("today is Saturday, but tomorrow is Sunday"), they know that the Christians of Bethlehem know exactly what they mean:

When we finish with the Jews, we start on the Christians.

Meanwhile the majority of the Christian world stands idly by (remember Leviticus 19:16), while a small but influencial minority are the cheerleaders for Hitler's little helpers.

This was written by Khaled Abu Toameh and it appeared in the Jerusalem Post Jan. 25, 2007.

BETHLEHEM -- A number of Christian families have finally decided to break their silence and talk openly about what they describe as Muslim persecution of the Christian minority in this city.

The move comes as a result of increased attacks on Christians by Muslims over the past few months. The families said they wrote letters to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, the Vatican, Church leaders and European governments complaining about the attacks, but their appeals have fallen on deaf ears.

According to the families, many Christians have long been afraid to complain in public about the campaign of "intimidation" for fear of retaliation by their Muslim neighbors and being branded "collaborators" with Israel.

But following an increase in attacks on Christian-owned property in the city over the past few months, some Christians are no longer afraid to talk about the ultra-sensitive issue. And they are talking openly about leaving the city.

"The situation is very dangerous," said Samir Qumsiyeh, owner of the Beit Sahur-based private Shepherd TV station. "I believe that 15 years from now there will be no Christians left in Bethlehem. Then you will need a torch to find a Christian here. This is a very sad situation."

Qumsiyeh, one of the few Christians willing to speak about the harsh conditions of their community, has been the subject of numerous death threats. His house was recently attacked with fire-bombs, but no one was hurt.

Qumsiyeh said he has documented more than 160 incidents of attacks on Christians in the area in recent years.

He said a monk was recently roughed up for trying to prevent a group of Muslim men from seizing lands owned by Christians in Beit Sahur. Thieves have targeted the homes of many Christian families and a "land mafia" has succeeded in laying its hands on vast areas of land belonging to Christians, he added.

Fuad and Georgette Lama woke up one morning last September to discover that Muslims from a nearby village had fenced off their family's six-dunam plot in the Karkafa suburb south of Bethlehem. "A lawyer and an official with the Palestinian Authority just came and took our land," said 69-year-old Georgette Lama.

The couple was later approached by senior PA security officers who offered to help them kick out the intruders from the land. "We paid them $1,000 so they could help us regain our land," she said, almost in tears. "Instead of giving us back our land, they simply decided to keep it for themselves. They even destroyed all the olive trees and divided the land into small plots, apparently so that they could offer each for sale." When her 72-year-old husband, Fuad, went to the land to ask the intruders to leave, he was severely beaten and threatened with guns.

"My husband is after heart surgery and they still beat him," Georgette Lama said. "These people have no heart. We're afraid to go to our land because they will shoot at us. Ever since the beating, my husband is in a state of trauma and has difficulties talking."

The Lamas have since knocked on the doors of scores of PA officials in Bethlehem seeking their intervention, but to no avail. At one stage, they sent a letter to Abbas, who promised to launch an investigation.

"We heard that President Mahmoud Abbas is taking our case very seriously," said Georgette Lama. "But until now he hasn't done anything to help us get our land back. We are very concerned because we're not the only ones suffering from this phenomenon. Most Christians are afraid to speak, but I don't care because we have nothing more to lose."

The couple's Christian neighbor, Edward Salama, said the problem in the city was the absence of law and order. "We are living in a state of chaos and lawlessness," he said. "The police are afraid of the thugs who are taking our lands."

Salama expressed deep concern over the conditions of Christians in Bethlehem, noting that many were leaving the country as a result of the deterioration.

"When I see what's happening to Christians here, I worry a lot for our future," he said. "They are targeting Christians, because we are seen as weak."

The Lamas said they decided to go public with the hope that the international community would intervene with the PA to halt the land-grab. "We will fight and fight until we recover our land," Fuad Lama said. "We will resort to the courts and to the public opinion for help.

"Unfortunately, Christian leaders and spokesmen are afraid to talk about the problems we are facing. We know of three other Christian families -- Salameh, Kawwas and Asfour -- whose lands were also illegally seized by Muslims."

A Christian businessman who asked not to be identified said the conditions of Christians in Bethlehem and its surroundings had deteriorated ever since the area was handed over to the PA in 1995.

"Every day we hear of another Christian family that has immigrated to the US, Canada or Latin America," he said. "The Christians today make up less than 15 percent of the population.

People are running away because the Palestinian government isn't doing anything to protect them and their property against Muslim thugs. Of course not all the Muslims are responsible, but there is a general feeling that Christians have become easy prey."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467807655& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

THE HONOR OF AMERICAN JEWRY
Posted by Naomi Ragen, January 27, 2007.

Friends,

Another article by Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick, who deserves awards for sheer guts, and for saying the true things that no one else wants to say, or read, or hear. This appeared in the Jewish Press.

Caroline Glick is deputy managing editor of The Jerusalem Post. Her Jewish Press-exclusive column will appear the last week of each month.

Naomi

It would seem that American Jewry has lost its sense of honor. In early 1984, as he sought the Democratic nomination for the presidency, civil rights leader Jesse Jackson made a major misstep. In a conversation with African-American Washington Post reporter Milton Coleman, Jackson referred to Jews as "Hymies," and to New York City as "Hymietown."

When the remarks were reported, a storm of protest erupted. Jewish leaders and organizations issued uniform demands that Jackson publicly apologize for his remarks. Jackson accused Jews of conspiring to defeat him. Appearing on a radio broadcast with the notorious anti-Semite and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, Jackson was silent as Farrakhan threatened Coleman and then issued a public warning to Jews: "If you harm this brother [Jackson], it will be the last one you harm."

Yet the Jews of America did not relent. And the U.S. media also did not relent. In February 1984, Jackson belatedly issued a public apology to Jews in a synagogue in New Hampshire. But his electoral prospects had dried up by that point. When he ran again for president four years later, then-New York mayor Ed Koch said ahead of the New York Democratic primary, "Jews and supporters of Israel who are not Jewish would be crazy to vote for him." Jackson lost big in New York and shortly thereafter retreated from the race.

Compare the properly angry and unforgiving response of American Jewry in 1984 to the American Jewish response earlier in the month when General Wesley Clark made a similar anti-Semitic slur in remarks to the press. Clark, who ran in the Democratic presidential primaries in 2004 and has made noises about another run in 2008, expressed his anger to popular left-wing blogger Arianna Huffington over reports that the Bush administration may order preemptive military strikes against Iran's nuclear installations.

When asked why he felt that the administration is heading in that direction, Clark responded, "You just have to read what's in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers."

Clark's anti-Semitic attack received precious little attention in the mainstream media. Jewish organizations have uttered no significant outcries against him. Clark put the remark behind him by writing an abject letter to Anti-Defamation League National Director Abe Foxman, but the ADL's website makes no mention of the incident.

From the perspective of the American Jewish leadership, apparently, Clark's obscene attack on Jews was a non-incident.

Unfortunately, Clark's attack was anything but unique. Indeed, it fits into a larger trend in which politicians and public figures feel an unacceptable level of comfort in attacking Jews and accusing both Israel and its American Jewish supporters of nefariously subverting America's national interest in order to advance Israel's security interests.

These attacks go hand in hand with an overall denial of the existence of the global jihad or of an international campaign of radical Islam that targets the U.S. and its allies throughout the world.

There are a number of those on the right side of the political spectrum, who like former secretary of state James Baker and former national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, have repeatedly sought to convince the American people that the only reason the U.S. is being targeted by jihadists from Chicago to Iraq to Iran is because Israel has refused to cede Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to Hamas and Fatah and the Golan Heights to Syria. Yet the fact of the matter is that the growing chorus of voices accusing the so-called "Israel Lobby" of subverting America's national interests is largely found on the Left and increasingly in the leadership ranks of the Democratic Party.

In the January issue of Commentary magazine, Gabriel Schoenfeld noted that after the jihadist Hamas terror organization won the Palestinian Authority elections last January and formed the Palestinian government, Congress moved to pass the Palestinian Anti-Terror Act of 2006. The act, which prohibits the administration from funding the PA until the president could verify that terrorist organizations would not be among the aid recipients and the Palestinian government recognized Israel's right to exist, passed handily in both houses. And yet, in the House of Representatives the bill was opposed by 37 members while nine more abstained from voting on the measure.

Of those 46 members of the House who refused to support a bill that denied taxpayer money to terrorists committed to Israel's physical annihilation, 41 were Democrats.

The willingness of Democrats in Congress to oppose anti-terror legislation goes hand in hand with the increased willingness of leading figures in the party to emphasize their hostility toward Jews and Israel. That hostility is most prominently reflected today in former president Jimmy Carter's newly minted anti-Israel screed Palestine Peace not Apartheid and his repeated broadsides against Israel and American Jewry in his public appearances since his book was published late last year.

While Carter has long been suspected of anti-Jewish prejudices, his current willingness risk his reputation as a public figure by openly attacking Jews and Israel shows just how hostile the current intellectual climate on the American Left is toward Jews. The silence of Democratic leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, New York Senator Hillary Clinton, and Illinois Senator Barack Obama in the wake of Carter's anti-Jewish campaign speaks volumes about the acceptability of his sort of behavior in the Democratic Party today.

Unfortunately, to a degree, American Jews share a large portion of the blame for the current state of the Democratic Party. In last November's Congressional elections, exit polls showed that some 88 percent of American Jews voted for Democratic candidates. The Republican Jewish Coalition was the only major American Jewish group to demand that Wesley Clark apologize for his anti-Semitic outburst.

If American Jewry is not willing to stand up for itself by denying electoral support to a party that is increasingly hostile to Jewish interests, there is no reason for the Democratic Party police itself. If American Jews refuse to responsibly reconsider their support for a party whose leading voices either do not hesitate to malign Israel and American Jews or tolerate those who do, then why should the Democratic Party behave responsibly?

Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and journalist who lives in Jerusalem. She can be contacted at www.naomiragen.com, where you can subscribe to her newsletter.

To Go To Top

THE HERTZLIYA CONFERENCE
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 27, 2007.

THE HERTZLIYA CONFERENCE: In 2004 Prime Minister Ariel Sharon announced his plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip at the Hertzliya conference -- Here is this year's bombshell made by Knesset member Shlomo Breznitz, close confidant of Olmert. The conference was not one sided, Moshe Yaalon and Robert (Israel) Aumann represent the view that Judea and Sumaria are a necessary part of Israel.

Even the leaders of Egypt and Jordan have expressed reservations about withdrawal plans, fearing terrorism can spill over into their respective countries.

Clearly, withdrawal doesn't bring peace.

1> Shimon Peres, a speaker at the Hertzliya Conference played the Falstaff in his address. He prattled on and on and at the end came to this: "The agreement of our time with King Hussein was an attempt to create a Jordanian-Palestinian-Israeli free trade triangle. Today, there is no chance of returning to such a confederation unless it is an economic, rather than political, confederation. The plan is to take the border from Eilat to Yarmuch (in the Golan) and turn it into a joint economic area between us, the Jordanians, and the Palestinians. Infrastructure, airports, and roads will be built. We will manage the water reservoirs effectively. This will achieve a number of things including raising the standard of living and bringing global support. " I will spare you the entire address which you can find at:
www.herzliyaconference.org/Eng/ _Articles/Article.asp?ArticleID=1733&CategoryID=223

Some Jews are incurably stupid -- If you want Israel to survive, you've got to accept the possibility that some are just stupid. Gaza was Czechoslovakia. If we allow the turn-over of the disputed territories to our enemies we will surely have reached the tipping point, the point of no return, the beginning of the second Holocaust.

Shimon Peres' Address Can Be Found At:
www.herzliyaconference.org/Eng/ _Articles/Article.asp?ArticleID=1733&CategoryID=223

2>Another Speaker At The Hertzilya Conference, Knesset Member Breznitz: "The only way to get out of the impasse is to transfer the territories, for a limited time, to an international mandate, that will run them until the establishment of a Palestinian state," said Breznitz at the conference. Who can forget the past International control of Jerusalem.

Hertilya Conference 2007: Knesset Member Breznitz's Proposal to transfer control of the West Bank to a European task force until the establishment of a Palestinian state

Jerusalem -- A member of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's Kadima party yesterday proposed transferring control of the West Bank to a European task force until the establishment of a Palestinian state, at which time the strategic territory would be handed to security forces associated with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

The proposal comes after WND broke the story earlier this week that, according to top European and Egyptian diplomatic sources, Israel has been conducting behind-the-scene negotiations to hand over most of the West Bank to Abbas' security forces. The sources said the transfer of security control to Abbas would be coordinated by the European Union and Jordan.

The West Bank borders Jerusalem and is within rocket-firing range of Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.

At Israel's prestigious Herzliya Conference, Knesset Member Shlomo Breznitz, reportedly a close confidante of Olmert, said yesterday the West Bank should be transferred temporarily to the Europeans and that most of the territory's Jewish communities should be evacuated.

"The only way to get out of the impasse is to transfer the territories, for a limited time, to an international mandate, that will run them until the establishment of a Palestinian state," said Breznitz at the conference.

The Herzliya Conference is attended by Israel's top leadership and regularly maps out the country's agenda for the coming year. In 2004, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon announced his plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip at the conference.

Breznitz told Israel's Maariv daily newspaper the West Bank should be transferred to the European community and not the U.S. because, he said, after the invasion of Iraq, America "lost its status as an honest broker in the view of the Palestinians and the Arab states."

Breznitz said his West Bank transfer proposal received a warm reception from European and Palestinian officials.

"I have reason to believe, and I don't want to expand on this, that the Palestinians will support the proposal. Ambassadors and diplomatic representatives from European countries who were shown the proposal also believe that without international help it will not be possible to resolve the conflict," said Breznitz.

On Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said he viewed any Palestinian elements recognizing the state of Israel as a partner for negotiations "even if it is Hamas."

Olmert has made similar comments.

So far, Hamas has refused to recognize Israel but recently offered a 10-year truce with the Jewish state. In a series of interviews this past weekend, Hamas leaders told WND during any 10-year truce period they would build a large Palestinian army and plan for the destruction of Israel.

Israeli leaders previously have denied reports of pending withdrawals only to later carry them out. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, elected in 2001 on a platform against unilateral withdrawal, at first denied media reports Israel was planning to evacuate the Gaza Strip but later announced his Gaza withdrawal plan.

Olmert was elected prime minister on the platform of carrying out a withdrawal from the West Bank, but after this summer's Lebanon war, he has stated a West Bank withdrawal would not occur.

Olmert in August called the policy of unilateral withdrawal a "failure" and said it was "no longer relevant." But he can argue handing the West Bank to Abbas in an agreement is not unilateral.

Contradicting Olmert, Israeli Interior Minister Roni Bar-On of Olmert's Kadima party said last summer, "The withdrawal plan is not dead, though its implementation has been postponed. The plan is now on the shelf or in the freezer, but when the time comes it will be accessed."

Several recent public opinion polls showed the majority of Israelis now oppose a West Bank withdrawal.

3>"Former IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Yaalon, Israeli concessions will only aid jihadists"
aliyahtoday@yahoo.com

The Palestinian government and Hizbullah are seeking Israel's destruction, not just the end of the occupation, former IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Yaalon said at the Herzliya Conference Monday. He also warned that Israel could not avoid a confrontation with Iran.

"The fact that Israel was attacked last summer from two areas it left strengthens the sense of a dead end, and proves that the root of the conflict is not the occupation of territories," Yaalon said. He added that Hizbullah's aim was not the liberation of Lebanon, but the destruction of the State of Israel, and that the same was true of the Palestinian Hamas government.

"Erase the green line and the '67 borders -- Israeli concessions will only aid jihadists," Yaalon declared. Turning to the Iranian threat, Yaalon said: "We cannot avoid confrontation with the Iranian regime. "The sense of self-confidence in Iran is growing, and they have not paid any price for being a rogue regime. If we do not take political and economic steps, we are actually bringing a military conflict closer," the former chief of staff warned.

"This (Iranian) regime won't last forever," Yaalon said, but added: "I don't see any internal change without a shock coming from outside. "Iran is a rogue government that supports terrorism. It must be punished by the international community," he insisted. 'UN losing authority' Yaalon slammed the United Nations for failing to punish Hizbullah, Syria and Iran during the Lebanon war, saying that the international body "is losing authority in the world" as a result.

He urged cooperation with Sunni elements that "view the Shiite hegemony as a threat to their existence." "The clash of civilizations is also going on inside the Muslim world. Not all Muslims are jihadists," Yaalon emphasized. "They too see what is happening in Gaza, and recognize that the culture of death is destructive. The West and Israel must make contact with them."

In response to a question as to the viability of the two-state solution, Yaalon said: "There is no full program on how it will look in the end. You have to point to the challenges and offer a strategy for the long-term. I don't know what will happen. I know those who talk about a road map or call for pressure on Israel to take steps to solve the problem (are suggesting something that is) irrelevant. Withdrawal will not solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or solve the jihadi threat."

'Palestinian education is root of terror'

He added that without a drastic reform in the Palestinian education system, which he said brainwashes children to become terrorists, there could be no hope for peace. "We tried to ignore the education in Palestinian society. Eventually we were surprised that (Palestinian) society, educated from kindergarten to become suicide bombers, acted as it did," Yaalon said, pointing to the bomb attacks throughout the slo years of the 1990s.

"The basis of our belief, that the other side wants two states, is false. I think there is deep understanding among the American public over this," Yaalon added. His comments were backed by former CIA Director James Woolsey. "As long as Wahabis are running Palestinian education, and little boys are taught to be suicide bombers, I don't see any reasonable prospects for settlement," Woolsey said.

The former CIA chief added that in Israel one-fifth of the population is Arab, living freely with full rights. He called for Palestinians to be held "to the same standard as Israel," adding that if standards were the same, "something in the order 500,000 Jews would be living in West Bank," with freedom of expression and religion.

Yaalon said, "The fact that Israel was attacked last summer from two areas it left strengthens the sense of a dead end, and proves that the root of the conflict is not the occupation of territories," "The Palestinian government and Hizbullah are seeking Israel's destruction, not just the end of the occupation, former IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Yaalon said at the Herzliya Conference Monday. He also warned that Israel could not avoid a confrontation with Iran.

4> Israel (Robert) J. Aumann, The 7th Herzliya Conference Nobel Prize Laureate; Professor at Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

First of all, I would like to thank the conference organizers for inviting me to speak at this important and central event. I was asked to speak about the existential dangers threatening the State of Israel. One danger known to all of us stems from Iran's nuclear armament program, which threatens to erase the State of Israel from the map. We cannot underestimate the importance of this danger.

However, in my humble opinion, it is less threatening than it appears at first glance.

Iran is a nation like all nations; it has an address-we know who it is and where it is. If the rumors are true-that the State of Israel has according deterrence capability. and no less importantly, means of delivering weapons, then there is indeed a danger, but it is a limited one. The rulers of Iran are often called lunatics, but there is no evidence that this is the case. Iran's rulers act very rationally. They have goals that indeed oppose our goals, but these are their goals, and they advance them very effectively. The destruction of central Iranian cities is not one of their goals. We certainly need to stand guard, but the fear of Iran's direct use of nuclear weapons against Israel seems minimal. I allow myself to speak freely because I don't know anything that's happening in the field-perhaps less than anyone in this hall.

However, unfortunately, there is a different danger in Iran's nuclear armament-more tangible and more threatening, although more indirect. This danger is hidden in the possibility that nuclear technology will be transferred from Iran to terrorist groups such as Al Qaida or others-groups whose identities are indistinct, who have no address. Even these groups are not insane; they act consistently, rationally, and sophisticated in order to achieve their goals. But because they have no address, direct deterrence policy is not effective in their case. Thus, if they succeed in obtaining nuclear weapons, it is unclear how we will be able to deter them from using it against us.

These groups, or some of them, are very close in their goals and ideology to Iran. Therefore, this is a great danger in the transfer of nuclear technology and the necessary materials from Iran to these groups. One possibility is that such a transfer would be intended and approved by the Iranian authorities. Another possibility, which is more likely, is that the transfer will not be intended or planned; this is a case of infiltration of radical terrorist elements into the Iranian nuclear system or of a lack of sufficient caution of the Iranian authorities or of a leak or of deliberate smuggling in the lower echelons of the Iranian system-leaks and smuggling that are unauthorized and even unknown to the higher echelons.

If such a transfer occurs in one of these two ways, then we will in fact be in substantial trouble. We will not be able to directly prevent these groups to execute their schemes. Therefore, we must act indirectly by offering appropriate incentives. In my opinion, there are two ways to do this. One is to create strong and tangible motivation for the government of Iran to prevent at all costs the transfer of nuclear technology and materials to groups that do not function under its auspices. The second and less effective way is to give strong and tangible motivation to these terrorist groups we have mentioned not to use nuclear weapons against Israel, even if they have obtained such weapons. As we have said, this type of deterrence is not easy because these groups have no address, but they have goals and they have an ideological identity, and it is possible to create adequate incentives on this backdrop.

We mentioned two existential threats facing the State of Israel -- the direct nuclear threat and the indirect nuclear threat. As we have said, the second danger is greater, and now a few words about a third threat, which is perhaps the greatest of all. It does not come from Iran, nor from terrorist groups, nor from any external source. It comes from within us. "We have met the enemy, and it is us."

Esteemed ladies and gentlemen, your humble servant makes his living from game theory-among other things, very serious games: games of life and death and of existence and annihilation. The name of the game in game theory is motivation, incentives. Earlier, we discussed the motivations of those standing on the opposite side. Motivating ourselves is the most important thing, and the thing we are losing the most. Without motivation, we will not endure. What are we doing here? Why are we here? What are we aspiring to here? We are here because we are Jewish, we are Zionist, because of our ancient bond to this land; we aspire to realize our 2000-year-old hope of becoming a free nation in our land, the Land of Zion and Jerusalem. Without this profound understanding, we will not endure. We will simply no longer be here; Post-Zionism will finish us off.

About half a year ago in Petra, Jordan, the prime minister said that we are tired. He was right. He was elected by the nation, and he expresses the sentiments of the nation. We are like a mountain-climber that gets caught in a snowstorm; the night falls, he is cold and tired, and he wants to sleep. If he falls asleep, he will freeze to death. We are in terminal danger because we are tired.

I will allow myself to say a few unpopular, unfashionable words: our panicked lunging for peace is working against us. It brings us farther away from peace, and endangers our very existence. I think it was Churchill who said, "If you want peace, prepare for war." The preparation includes material preparation, a fantastic army, effective tools of war, but above all, we are talking about spiritual preparation, about spiritual readiness to go to war.

Roadmaps, capitulation, gestures, disengagements, convergences, deportations, and so forth do not bring peace. On the contrary, they bring war, just as we saw last summer. These things send a clear signal to our "cousins" that we are tired, that we no longer have spiritual strength, that we have no time, that we are calling for a time-out. They only whet their appetites. It only encourages them to pressure us more, to demand more, and not to give up on anything. These things stem from simple theoretical considerations and also from straight thinking.

But it's not just theory: it has been proven and re-proven in the field over thousands of years. I returned today from a trip to India, where we heard about historical stories that illustrate the same. Capitulations bring about war; determination and readiness bring about peace.

Ladies and gentlemen, we must tell our cousins that we are staying here. We are not moving. We have time; we have patience; we have stamina. Understand this and internalize it. And we must not simply say it to our cousins but feel it within ourselves. This and only this will bring peace. We can really live in peace and unity and cooperation with our cousins. But only after they understand and internalize that the Zionist state will be here forever.

Thank you very much.

5> ISRAEL'S EXPEDITED EXPULSION PLAN

Israel's expedited expulsion plan. Olmert has deputized Yossi Amrani to 'sell the plan' to AIPAC and the US administration.

Jews for a Jewish Israel correspondents covering the "Israel Illogical concessions" uncovered a vicious underhanded plot by Mr. Olmert and his cabinet to establish a temporary PLO state and unilaterally surrender lands in Judea and Samaria, calling for the expulsion of more than one hundred thousand Jewish Israeli citizens. Jews for a Jewish Israel is further reporting that the team includes high-ranking officials in the Foreign and Defense Ministries, and high-ranking representatives of the Israeli army and Israeli intelligence also involved in the process.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and the director-general of her ministry, Aharon Abramowitz, appointed a high-ranking official who will coordinate the effort -- diplomat Yossi Amrani, the former Israeli consul in San Francisco.

The choice of Amrani could not have been coincidental.

In November, 2003, this reporter revealed that Amrani, despite his official position as the Israeli consul, organized fund raising events for Israeli opposition leader Yossi Beilin, who then led the Geneva Initiative on December 1st, 2003, which called for the unilateral establishment of a palestinian entity within temporary borders, under the unchallenged rule of the PLO.

Now Amrani has been given the task of formulating, within several weeks, an official working paper of the Israeli government which will give a detailed outline of Israel's immediate surrender of land to the PLO Among other things, Amrani will deal with the question of how Israel should sell the plan to AIPAC and to the US administration.

During the Summer 2006 Lebanon War, Prime Minister Olmert was quoted as saying that the war would contribute to his plans for carrying out a withdrawal plan. The statement, which was denied by the Prime Minister's Bureau, aroused a great deal of criticism, mainly because thousands of religious soldiers, many of them inhabitants of the settlements, were risking their lives on the front at that very time.

Olmert therefore had to clarify that the option of unilateral withdrawal was frozen, and even said that it had never been adopted as Israel's official policy. He said that the only policy in effect was that of negotiations with Abu Mazen and the continued boycott of the Hamas government. Olmert is consistent in this position, and has reiterated it several times since the cease-fire in mid-August.

Ironically, a previous commission was established by Israeli Foreign Minister Livni to evaluate the idea of a unilateral withdrawal from most of Judea and Samaria.

That commission's report, leaked to the Haaretz newspaper on August 15th, 2006, concluded that, "Israel has no security solution to the threat of rockets launched from the West Bank against population centers." The report's authors assumed that following any unilateral Israeli pullout from any part of Judea and Samaria, Hamas will takeover and deploy rockets against Israel's population centers on Israel's coastal plain.

The report emphasized that the only solution to the missile threat that the Israel Defense Forces has to offer is its actual presence in the territories and control of the high ground of Judea and Samaria, also known as the "West Bank."

Another conclusion of the report commissioned by the Israeli Foreign Minister is that Israel will not gain international recognition for an end to the occupation if it continues to hold significant portions of Judea and Samaria. Foreign Ministry Director General Aharon Abramovitch, headed that commission.

An Israeli Member of the Knesset has asked for a copy of the previous Israeli foreign ministry report which warned against any unilateral surrender of territory to the PLO. The spokesman of the Israel Foreign Ministry has informed MK Alon's aide that this was an "internal report" that it would not be released.

6> In preparation for surrendering Yesh, with its population of 100,000 Israelis, 32 roadblocks in Yesha have been closed or unmanned this passed week

From a friend who lives in Kedumim beyond the green line, written to Israel Lives January 24th.

As I drive around where I live in Kedumim I physically see that the road blocks at the turnoff to Shaveh Shomrom is now unmanned and appears abandoned. The roadblocks at the edge of Schem turning towards Tapuach Junction is now unmanned and also appears abandoned. Half the time I visit the Settlement of Tapuach the big roadblock there it is unmanned. Spot checks of army roadblocks I haven't seen for over a week. What can do but assume what I hear, read and see is true?

I've seen it on the internet, heard it on radio and maybe saw it in the English newspaper that the order to the IDF to begin dismantling the 32 roadblocks that are daily in Yesh (Jehudah and Shomron) not at the borders or airports.

I know there is no help to be expected from within nor without the State of Israel. As I wrote in the letter that I sent you, the whole leadership of the so called Right has been systematically and methodically eliminated from 1993 according to the directives signed in the Oslo Accords.

It's all a signed, sealed and waiting to be delivered deal. Olmert was just about giving the orders to start dismantling Jehudah and Shomron when the whole process was stopped by the War in Lebanon. Reread the papers 2 or 3 days before. Evidently now from what I saw on television last night everything is put on hold because of the result of the War in Lebanon and the ensuing investigations so they are going to "just" dismember the Jewish Enclave in Hebron to show the Israeli Politician's foreign handlers that they are doing something.

Meanwhile daily the Arabs are receiving weapons, rockets bigger and longer ranges (showing them off on the PA television from Ramallah the other night) and we can do nothing but wait for the onslaught as I tried to portray that is planned for us.

About the diaspora, every major Jewish organization and Jeshivah has been infiltrated and its leaders are each found on the membership list of the Council on Foreign Relations CFR the main thrust of the Globalizationers. Check it on the internet, Weiss, Bronfman both brothers, etc.

Janet I agree with your estimate. There are a lot of storm clouds gathering around us. Keep writing and remember the Chabad saying, "A little lit candle dispels much darkness."

B'bracha
Daniel Baruch

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

WE ALL WORSHIP THE SAME G_D???
Posted by Michael Travis, January 27, 2007.
"Islam means Peace" "For he who believes in the Trinity, "the Fire will be his abode ... a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemer." Qur'an (5:72-73) "I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims." (Hadith Sahih 4366) [Why has the Church denied Christians these truths?]
* "Fight and slay the pagans [Christians] wherever ye find them and seize them, confine them, and lie in wait for them in every place of ambush" (Surah 9:5)

* "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the last day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth of the people of the Book (the Jews and the Christians) until they pay the Jizya [tax on non-Muslims] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued." (Surah 9:29)

This next was posted by Pamela Geller Oshry yesterday in Australia, New World Leader It appeared on Atlas Shrugs website
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/ atlas_shrugs/australia_new_world_leader/archives/oldindex.html).

This is rich, Really rich. The rapist claimed to be a victim of "anti-Muslim conspiracy." The victim, racist canard is the established free pass for barbarism. It's only going to get worse. (hat tip Helen)

MUSLIM "DR" GETS 13 YEARS FOR RAPE The Australian

An Iraqi-trained doctor who claimed to be the victim of an anti-Muslim conspiracy has been jailed for 13 years for drugging and raping a patient. Rafid Alramadan, 55, was sentenced yesterday in the NSW District Court after he was found guilty of giving a woman in the NSW country town of Grenfell an injection of the stupefying drug valium and having non-consensual sex with her.

The victim, a patient of about 12 months, had visited Alramadan in December 2005 when the surgery was closed to pick up a driver's licence and had asked the doctor to give her a cortisone injection for knee pain.

But rather than administer the drug in the affected area, Alramadan gave her two injections in the arm, which left her feeling "hazy" and too weak to fight him off.

Alramadan then kissed and fondled her before raping her.

He was convicted in September of administering a stupefying drug, aggravated sexual intercourse without consent and aggravated indecent assault.

After being convicted at trial, the doctor accused the judge and jury of racism.

"This is because I am a Muslim. This is because I am from overseas. They go overseas to kill people, they want to kill me and my children, this is racism," he said.

No this is because you are a depraved rapist.

UPDATE: On the Atlas Shrugs website

From my blog bro Aussie News and Views

Dear Muslim Unity, I live in a city where there were conservatively in excess of 100 gang rapes comitted by self identified MUSLIM gangs made up of some of Islams finest, some are imprisoned MOST are still roaming the streets of Sydney.

In every case that was brought before the courts appx. 4 to 6 the evidence showed that he victims were selected because they were NOT Muslim and their defilers saw them as been lesser girls and therefore deserved to be raped by these so called brave sons of allah. Dont you come on here lectureing any body with your bull shit Koran inspired Islamic psychobabble and moral equivelance arguments, you would not know if a bus drove up your arse and half a dozen passenger got off.

I live in a city where the investigation of these pigs crimes was deliberately halted by our state Labor Party (Socialist)"Islam friendly" government so as not to have any anti Muslim publicity before and during the Sydney Olympic games of 2000, the facilitators and architects of the running sore of Multiculturalism could not afford to be exposed to the world as their 10,000lb Muslim Gorilla ran amock through the streets of Sydney for all the world to see.

Muslims are not all rapists and criminals but where I live most rapists and criminals are Muslims.

Yours faithfully,
Aussie.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

MODERNITY AND WESTERN VALUES IN THE CLUTCHES OF ISLAMIZATION
Posted by Magdi Khalil, January 26, 2007.

Muslim reformers of the past century sought and unfortunately failed to modernize Islam, the militants have won this battle.

The call for an international law that restricts individual freedoms is an open invitation for fascism to set roots and take over the world

The cartoons that have greatly offended the Muslim world recently have probably sparked an even greater debate about how the Muslims interact with the contemporary world.

Muslim reformers of the past century -- such as Mohammed Abdu, Refaa Al-Tahtawi, Taha Hussein, Ali Abdel-Razik and others -- sought and unfortunately failed to modernize Islam. The militants, led by Hassan Al-Banna and his partisans, won this battle, and forced their vision to "Islamize" modernity on the people. They created a certain pattern -- a mindset and a lifestyle -- and promoted it as "The Valid Islam," Al Islam al-Sahih. They resorted to seduction and fear to impose this pattern on their societies, and made sure to attach an "Islamic" label to each and every aspect, with the clear implication that other patterns were deemed non-Muslim and illegitimate. An increasingly wide array of things fall under this valid pattern: the Islamic dress, the Islamic banks, the Islamic economy, the Islamic education, the islamization of science, media and the judiciary system, the application and enforcement of Islamic laws, the widespread dissemination of the fundamentalist culture, the promotion of Islamic medicine and the Prophet's medicine, the expansion of Islamic organizations, the marginalization of the national identity of the state in favor of Islamic nationalism, and the islamization of daily vocabulary and political terms (mobayaa, welaya, shura, thawabet al-oma, etc..[pledge of allegiance, governance, counsel, constants).

As a result, the Muslim countries wasted their chance to embrace modernity, opting instead to import a shallow veneer of modernity from the West; and they became idle consumers of the products of civilization, with no contributions to offer. With different factions engaging in a morbid religious bid, intent on proving that they can win the title of the most rigid fundamentalists, it is no wonder that the Muslim societies started to crumble from within under the mounting pressures of regression and strife. However, the damage did not stop there, as some of those bidders developed a terrifying propensity towards violence which left a hideous mark on their societies; then, in a moment that went down in history, the violence spilled out to the outside world, and thus began the Muslims' greatest crisis with the contemporary world, and particularly with the West.

If this horrifying action brought about the initial problem, the crisis became more pronounced as a result of the massive Muslim immigration to Western countries, and the presence of large Muslim communities in Europe, the United States and Australia. These communities are supposed to bridge the modernity gap between West and East as the pioneers of the Arab renaissance once did, but, instead, many of the immigrants are holding firm to the prospect of Islamized modernity, whether because of a long-ingrained belief or one acquired through the influence of the islamized media stemming, in over-abundance, from the Middle East. Many have insulated themselves in their own world, in a form of isolated "ghettos", identified by their particular dress, halal food and special culture. In and of itself, this poses no problem, as the modern Western mind-set greatly values pluralism and respects cultural idiosyncrasies. However, it soon became a problem when some of those immigrants attempted to impose their own values on the western societies in which they lived, or to elevate their values above the laws of the communities in which they lived. United States Vice President Dick Cheney summed up the situation by saying: "Either the Islamist terrorists will succeed to alter the Western lifestyle, or the West will succeed in altering their lifestyle."

On the Islamic side, the European Muslim advocate Tariq Ramadan confirmed without hesitation: "The Muslims should not accept values that conflict with the Islamic faith and values," and "The Muslims are not obliged to uphold the secular French tradition; they have made no historical contributions to this tradition."

But what happens when those values clash with the law? What about spreading hatred in the name of religion, beating women (as the Imam of a mosque in Spain encouraged), female circumcision, the violation of children's rights, polygamy, judging non-Muslims as infidels, deeming the Muslims' enlistment in Western militaries an illegitimate act, abusing the system of social welfare, heaping praise on terrorism and acts of murder, or actually joining terrorist organizations?

A major difference in opinion between the Muslims and the West has to do with the separation of state and religion, including the right to criticize religions, and the right to have a religious belief, or to hold no religious beliefs (atheism). It was this total and clear-cut separation of religion and state that made the members of the European Union insist on not making a single reference to Christianity in the European constitution, though it is the recognized faith of the majority in Europe. There are countless books in Europe that attack religion, God, the prophets and Christianity in particular, and many that proclaim atheism. Karl Marx, the man who whose philosophy depended on the statement that "religion was the opium of the people" embraced atheism as a foundation for his ideology. The famous German philosopher Nietzsche went as far as saying that "God is dead"; the French existentialist Sartre and his rebellious, atheist philosophy comes to mind, as well as dozens of variable atheist schools and philosophies that have spread throughout Europe. People are unlikely to forget shocking novels and movies such as "The Last Temptation of Christ", "The Da Vinci Code" novel,"The Abnormality of Paul" which discredited St. Paul, and even more shocking the book entitled "The Foolishness of God". Yet, there are no reports about anyone losing his life as a penalty for criticizing Christianity, and these philosophies and books did not jeopardize Christianity or Judaism; as a matter of fact, the Eastern bloc countries went right back to their abandoned faith after the collapse of the USSR.

Islamic extremism is a menace to the value of freedom, starting with the hunt of novelist Salman Rushdie, the murder of the Egyptian intellectual Farag Fouda, and the Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh; and ending recently with the fatwa (legal Islamic opinion) to kill the Danish cartoonist, and the riots and acts of violence that surrounded this incident. In between the first and the latest, there were dozens of incidents when writers, intellectuals and artists were the target of similar assaults. Following the publication of the cartoons, a fatwa sanctioned the elimination of the cartoonist, and a statement by Al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades in Palestine threatened the citizens of Denmark, Norway and France. Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the head of the extremist Hezbollah movement, said that people would not have dared to insult the Prothet if the novelist Salman Rushdie had been executed.

Nasrallah's appalling comment echoes that of Omar Abdel Rahman years ago: "If Naguib Mahfouz (Egyptian author nobel-laureate) has been killed, Salman Rushdie wouldn't have crossed the line". Abdel Rahman has thus given his blessings for killing Naguib Mahfouz, who received a serious injury in a failed attempt on his life. The frenzy surrounding this last incident was palpable when an Islamic demonstration went out in London carrying terrorist slogans that incite hatred and murder and defy the basic values of Western civilization: "To hell with freedom", "Slay those who insult the prophet", "Wipe out those who mock Islam", "Europe, you will pay the price: The disaster of 9/11 is on its way to you".

Meanwhile, the Arab media has no qualms about attacking and insulting Christianity and Judaism. Let's take a look at some insulting titles written by "Abu Islam Ahmed", the Egypt Islamic writer, that were displayed in The Cairo International Book Fair in January 2006": "The Church and Sexual Deviation","Pagan Beliefs in Christianity", "The Unholy Book", "A Nation without a Cross"," Oh ye filthy gypsies: a message to the Diaspora Christians"; and a book about Farag Fouda, under the extremely revolting title "Who Killed the Dog?"

The most prominent Arab newspaper Al-Ahram devotes a whole page every week to the articles of Zaghloul Al-Nagar, where, among other things, he openly expresses the contempt he has for other religions: "Judaism is not so much a religion as it is a disease that twists the sane human nature and takes it out of the circle of humanity and into the devils' circle" (Al-Ahram, 22 July 2002), "the infidels and hypocrite unbelievers are mainly those among Ahl-Al-ketab (People of the Book, i.e. Jews and Christians) who have corrupted their religion, the vile Jews, the worst infidels throughout history and until God inherits the land" (Al-Ahram, 15 July, 2002). The insults are not just restricted to the written word, but extend to extremely rude actions as reported by an L.A. Times journalist who saw a number of Palestinians who were hiding in the "Nativity" church use pages from the Holy Bible as toilet paper. However, no Muslims were assaulted due to this incident, and there were no violent demonstrations in the West, a fact that stands in sharp contrast with the Muslims' increasingly frenzied reaction, the excessive threats and the actual violence whenever Islam is involved.

The Muslim states have collectively requested to include the following statement in the proposal to establish a human rights council as a substitute for the UN Human Rights commission: "An offense directed at religions or prophets should be considered a threat to human rights and basic freedoms, and is in conflict with the freedom of expression". If the statement is approved, freedom will be imperiled, mouths will be gagged, and the militants and extremists will be celebrating their victory, while the world will be forced to bow to the values of Islamist Fascism. First, the Muslim countries will not abide by this resolution, just as they did not abide by other UN resolutions and treaties; second, they do not acknowledge other religions (for example Denmark acknowledges 12 religions, while most Muslim states only acknowledge 3 religions and some of them only acknowledge Islam, and realistically, in all of the Muslim countries, the Muslims are the only ones to enjoy religious freedom as defined by the UN); third, followers of religions other than Islam suffer the most persecution in the Muslim states; fourth, while the Muslim states are half-heartedly condemning terrorism, they are in fact backing terrorists, and supporting their tactics. At the end of the road, terrorism will benefit the most from this"protection"; this clause will shield it against criticism since Islamic terrorism resorts to religious texts as a means to mobilize and motivate terrorists.

The call for an international law that restricts individual freedoms is an open invitation for fascism to set roots and take over the world; fascist values were behind the regression of the Muslim societies, and it is illogical to impose those same values on countries which have bravely resisted fascism, nazism, and religious tyranny, and paid the price with the lives of millions of victims.

The shameful silence of the moderate Muslims in Muslim states will eventually make the leadership of those states fall into the hands of the militants, corrupted opportunists, and tyrants; it will also increase the chances of a disastrous collision with the path of progress of humanity. Ultimately, the values of freedom will gain the upper hand, but it seems that humanity is once more about to pay a huge price in order to preserve those values, and this time the face-off is with militant Islam.

Magdi Khalil is a political analyst, researcher, author and Executive Editor of the Egyptian weekly Watani International. He is also a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, London, a free-lance writer for several Arabic language newspapers, and a frequent contributor to Middle East broadcast news TV. Mr. Khalil has also published three books and written numerous research papers on citizenship rights, civil society, and the situation of minorities in the Middle East. E-mail: Magdikh@hotmail.com This article was originally published September 22, 2006.

To Go To Top

AL QAEDA AGENTS IN THE U.S. -- THE NEW ISLAMIC 'PEPSI GENERATION"
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 26, 2007.
This is written by Ahmed Gholam (ahmed.gholam@teol.lu.se).
www.institute-for-afghan-studies.org/>www.institute-for-afghan-studies.org

Mr. Gholam knows what he is talking about. Pakistan is not our ally. Are our FBI and CIA and Homeland Security on top of this issue?

B. Raman is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai

The US intelligence community is now willing to publicly express concern over the use of Pakistani territory by Al Qaeda and the Taliban, but still reluctant to criticise Musharraf for it... -- B. Raman / Outlook India

The US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence held hearings on January 11 and 18, 2007, respectively on Current and Projected National Security Threats. This was the beginning of the annual assessment done by the two committees. John Negroponte, the outgoing Director of National Intelligence, Gen. Michael Hayden, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Randall Fort, Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research, Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, Director of the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), testified before the Senate Committee. Negroponte, Gen. Hayden, Lt. Gen. Maples, Philip Mudd, Associate Executive Assistant Director of the National Security Branch in the FBI, and Charles Allen, Chief Information Officer, Department of Homeland Security, testified before the House Committee.

While the open discussion that followed the prepared testimonies in the Senate Committee largely focussed on the situation in Iraq, the members of the House Committee exhibited great concern over the dangers of an act of terrorism in the US homeland arising from the members of the Muslim diaspora in the US. Can the London blasts of July 7, 2005, which were carried out by four home-grown terrorists from the UK-based diaspora -- three of them of Pakistani origin -- be repeated in the US? That was the question preoccupying the minds of many members of the House Committee. Particularly, in the context of the post-9/11 tightening of physical security in the US, which has hopefully made it very difficult for outside elements to infiltrate into the US and carry out an act of terrorism, they were worried that a future 9/11 might come from home-grown terrorists from the diaspora. While indications of radicalisation of some members of the diaspora were noted, the question repeatedly posed was why the radicalisation in the US does not seem to be as serious as yet in the US as it is in the UK.

The answers given by the senior officials of the US intelligence community and the points made by the members of the House Committee showed an inadequate understanding of the nature of the diaspora from Pakistan in the UK and the US. It was pointed out by Robert Mueller that Al Qaeda "has been particularly successful in recruiting individuals from Pakistani and Kashmiri militant groups operating overseas as was evident in the recently disrupted Al Qaeda related airline plot out of the UK."

However, nobody pointed out that most of the radicalised Pakistanis in the UK come essentially from three communities -- the Punjabis, the Mirpuris, who are the Punjabi-speaking Kashmiris from the Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) and the Pashtuns. They are all Deobandis, who are close to the Wahabis, and have been in the forefront of jihadi terrorism in Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and the UK. The members of the Sindhi, Baloch and Mohajir communities in the diaspora in the UK, who are largely the tolerant Barelvis, have kept away from jihadi terrorism till now. While the majority of the Pakistani diaspora in the UK consists of the Deobandi Punjabis, Mirpuris and Pashtuns, there is a large percentage of the Barelvi Sindhis, Balochs and Mohajirs in the Pakistani diaspora in the US. There has been very little migration of the Mirpuri community to the US. Most of the Kashmiris, who have migrated to the US, are Hindu Pandits from India's Jammu and Kashmir, who were driven out by the jihadis.

Since 9/11, there has been an attempt by bin Laden's International Islamic Front (IIF) and its member-organisations such as the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET), the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HUM), the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HUJI) and the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JEM) to encourage their Deobandi/Wahabi members to migrate to the US to work as clerics in the mosques frequented by the people of Pakistani origin in order to radicalise them. The arrests of some Pakistanis, including clerics, in the US during the last two years on various charges, indicated that some progress towards radicalisation has already been made.

One of the members of the House Committee referred to a report carried by the Washington Post on January 18, 2007, about one Khan, a Pakistani, who had allegedly been asked by Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, who orchestrated the 9/11 terrorist strikes, to explore the possibility of poisoning US water reservoirs and blowing up gas stations. The threat of an act of home-grown terrorism from the Pakistani diaspora in the US has to be taken seriously. It is surprising that this did not receive the attention it deserved in the Senate Committee.

In his prepared testimony before the Senate Committee, Mueller gave the following assessments:

. Al Qaeda is still seeking to infiltrate operatives into the US from overseas, who have no known nexus to terrorism, using both legal and possibly illegal methods of entry.

. "Due to the stark differences in the history, the population and the immigrant assimilation in our two countries (the US and the UK), it is difficult to directly compare our terrorism threat to theirs. We see relatively less defined (home-grown) networks of terrorism and less developed attack planning (than in the UK)."

. It is possible, however, that the strategy for attacking the US homeland includes using the UK as a stepping stone.

. The diversity of home-grown extremists and the direct knowledge they have of the US makes the threat they pose potentially very serious. The radicalisation of US Muslim converts is of particular concern. Converts appear to be more vulnerable (to extremism) and likely to be placed in situations that put them in a position to be influenced by Islamic extremists.

. While Al Qaeda will continue to try to obtain and use, if it can, some form of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) material, it will most likely continue to focus on economic targets such as aviation, the energy sector and mass transit; soft targets such as large public gatherings; and symbolic targets such as monuments and government buildings.

. While there was the usual pro forma praise for Pakistan and its President, Gen.Pervez Musharraf, for what was projected as their commitment to co-operate with the US in its fight against terrorism, the hearings in the two committees clearly brought out that a resurgent Al Qaeda has re-organised its training and operational bases in the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) of Pakistan -- particularly in North and South Waziristan -- and in the Anbari Province of Iraq and was now trying to re-organise its bases in Somalia. It is apparent that senior officials of the US intelligence community apprehend that future acts of terrorism by Al Qaeda will, most probably, radiate from these three areas.

To quote Negroponte: "Al Qaeda's core elements are resilient. They continue to plot attacks against our Homeland and other targets with the objective of inflicting mass casualties. And they continue to maintain active connections and relationships that radiate outward from their leaders' secure hideout in Pakistan to affiliates throughout the Middle East, Northern Africa and Europe.....Many of our most important interests intersect in Pakistan, where the Taliban and Al Qaeda maintain critical sanctuaries. Pakistan is our partner in the war on terror. It is also a major source of Islamic extremism."

Gen. Hayden told the House Committee: "The immediate threat comes from providing Al Qaeda that which they are attempting to seek in several locations right now -- be it Somalia, the tribal areas of Pakistan or the Anbar Province -- a safe haven to rival that which they had in Afghanistan."

Philip Mudd compared the growing popularity of jihad among large sections of the Muslim youth to the popularity of Pepsi and characterised the global jihad as "the Pepsi Jihad".

From the hearings by the two committees, one could see that there is now a greater willingness in the US intelligence community to express publicly their concern over the use of the Pakistani territory by Al Qaeda and the Taliban. However, there is still a reluctance to criticise Musharraf for it and express doubts over his sincerity.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

THE USA PROPAGATED PALESTINIANS' STATEHOOD MANTRA IS SOCIALLY AND POLITICALLY PAINFULLY WRONG
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 26, 2007.

All of us who have Ahavat Yisrael -- love for the State of Israel -- do not object to having a "super-duper" good neighbor in an autonomous Palestinian state. Considering the European benchmark for accepting Turkey into the European Union, however, the Palestinians must take the necessary time to become a sovereign nation with freedom and equality for all its peoples and a robust, productive economy. In the case of Turkey, the process requires no less than fifteen years just to be eligible for entry into the European Union. For the Palestinians, the time needed for them to prove themselves worthy and deserving of statehood should be no less.

Until now, though, the Palestinians' record for nation building has been terribly counterproductive. Certainly, a nation building strategy based on the infliction of violence and aggression is not a formula for success. The Palestinians better change their ways immediately and take positive steps to form an acceptable state as opposed to a rogue regime.

Until such time as the Palestinians choose constructive nation building measures over destructive ones, there should simply be no discussion whatsoever about a two-state solution.

We must, furthermore, demand that the administration of the United States stop its fickle policy regarding Israel and the Palestinians. This policy vacillates as often as political opinions change, which is quite often. Enacting policy and then revising it every few months creates enormous confusion amongst the Palestinians (and the Israelis) about what nation building entails. For example, the administration pressed for free and fair elections. When the results of said elections proved unacceptable, the administration did an about face by backing a new policy to topple the elected regime that it had, in great measure, helped bring to power. Such willy-nilly U.S. policymaking does a huge disservice to Israel and to the Palestinians.

The U.S. administration must adopt a policy similar to the one the European Union has taken in regard to Turkey. The policy must be steadfast. It must not waver with every little change in political discourse. In order to achieve statehood, the Palestinians must be held to strictly enforced, high standards that cannot be altered or amended by intimidation, aggression, or violence. Until they are forced to capitulate to a plan in which only positive efforts produce results, the Palestinians will continue to cheat and abuse the process with wanton abandon.

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com or visit her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

THEY CALL IT ILLEGAL BUT DON'T CITE THE LAW; THE MUZZLED FRENCH; IRAN RUNNING OUT OF OIL?
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 26, 2007.

PROGRESSIVE EUROPEANS?

A P.A. newspaper quoted the Palestinian Institute for the Study of Democracy : "Bush puts the Medal of Freedom on the racist Natan Sharansky." The Institute is subsidized by Norway's Foreign Ministry (IMRA, 12/26 from Palestinian Media Watch).

Just as a publication is considered obscene for lacking redeeming social value, shouldn't the Left be considered obscene? It has become antisemitic and paralyzes free speech about Islam and defense of freedom from jihad. What could be redeeming about a Left that allies itself with the enemies of freedom and civilization, the most reactionary force on the planet? Can the Left redeem itself?

OLMERT INVESTIGATED

PM Olmert is being investigated for several cases of corruption. A report is anticipated for the near future (IMRA, 12/26).

The police investigate right-wingers to drive them from power or capture them. It investigates left-wingers for show. It would be an anomaly to convict Olmert for much, unless Vice-PM Peres is behind this and is ousting Olmert in order to replace him.

CONTROVERSY, MUSLIM ARAB STYLE

Prince Hassan of Jordan demanded an apology from Joshua Muravchik for misquoting him and unethically quoting him out of context. The complainant failed to show how he was quoted wrongly. Mr. Muravchik showed he quoted in context. The Prince had accused Israel of one of the most dastardly and cowardly crimes in history in attacking Lebanon and of inflicting terrorism upon the P.A. every day through an illegal occupation. The prince did not show what is illegal about Israelis' presence nor what it is an occupation, in his extremist piece purporting to be moderate.

Hassan would not prohibit terrorism until it is "defined objectively based upon acceptable international laws and principles." It has been so defined. What he really means is non-objective international "principles" "acceptable" to Muslims who would permit terrorism by redefining it as "resistance" to occupation. They'd exempt Islamic terrorism from prohibition by "definition." The prince is playing the Islamic semantic game (Letter, Commentary, 1/2007) of seeming to be against what they really are for.

E.U. WANTS TO EXTEND THE P.A. CEASEFIRE

The E.U. criticized Israel as acting illegally in approving another settlement. It urged both parties to do nothing to impair the ceasefire in Gaza. P.A. leaders should stop the firing of rockets and Israel should remain passive while blasted. Indeed, they should extend this ceasefire to Judea-Samaria (IMRA, 12/27) so Israel can remain passive while blasted there. The E.U would find that a great achievement for peace. But urging the P.A. to stop the firing of rockets interferes with its program of genocide. The E.U. wouldn't want to do that, would it? Clever of the E.U. to call what Israel does illegal, without citing which law is broken and how! Israel acts within international law.

IRAN TO PROLIFERATE NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY

Iran and Syria signed an agreement to share technical information. Iran said this includes nuclear development, peaceful, of course (IMRA, 12/27).

Just like the strictly peaceful development of nuclear energy that Iran claims it is doing and that it won't let be inspected but threatens to incinerate Israel with?

"Peaceful development?" When a country develops the basis for civilian nuclear industry, it needs work only a little more to figure out how to make nuclear weaponry. By then it is difficult to prevent the sprint to the bomb.

MUZZLED FRENCH

You must have heard of Robert Redeker, a French teacher who had to go into hiding for writing that Islam preaches hatred and holy war. Muslims were insulted, instead of congratulating him for understanding their doctrine. The Left objected to his speaking his mind. The full flavor of a remarkable story and insight is in Christian Delacampagne's treatment in Commentary (1/2007, p.25).

Only one French official and a few intellectuals decried the fatwa issued against Redeker and defended his freedom of speech.

The two, big, Socialist, teachers' unions disassociated themselves from Mr. Redeker. A radio personality invited him to express regrets. Le Monde called his article "excessive, misleading, and insulting," even a blasphemy. It means that a non-Muslim in a non-Muslim country must venerate, not investigate Muhammad. If he had criticized Judaism or Christianity, the intelligentsia would not have objected. Why the exception for Islam?

Why? Muslims showed they can riot and continue to commit violence. In the coming election, many will vote. French Orientalists harbor illusions and make unrealistic predictions, because of their affinity for the Arabs, which colors their perceptions. They think the answer to Islamic hostility is dialogue, not fighting back. They deny danger from the increasing Islamization of French suburbs and affirm danger from Israel. In French academia, ethnic or religious relations are taboo, as is friendliness towards the US. Break the taboo, and you won't find a berth at university. Most important, when France gave up colonialism, it sought good relations with the Arabs, and became pro-Arab to gain them. The French Church always opposed the restoration of the Jewish homeland to the Jewish people. The French Left sees Israel as colonialist and the US as brutal, but itself has become antisemitic.

"A quick look at a world map -- from Chechnya to Israel and the P.A., Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, Kashmir, southern Thailand, and the southern Philippines -- reveals that the planet's most devastating wars are now of the jihadist type." France no longer is the country of liberte, fraternite, and egalite.

Formerly, the Left had a large moderate wing. No longer. Now the Left stands for intolerance in the name of tolerance, and blocks speech of which it disapproves. The Left, there, is as unrealistic as we usually think of the Arabs being.

ISRAEL: FIGHT ROCKETEERS BUT OTHERWISE KEEP CEASEFIRE

The IDF was given leave to pinpoint counterattacks against rocket crews, but not otherwise track down terrorists. PM Olmert and Defense Min. Peretz urge the P.A. to take stronger measures against the rockets.

Increasingly, Army officers are accusing the government of immorality in its "restraint," as the Arabs wound Israelis with impunity, start to drive Israelis away, and build up a capability for warfare like that of Hizbullah.

Vice-PM Peres told Spain that Hamas has a major role to play in the "peace process" (Arutz-7, 12/27).

"Stronger measures?" What measures? None stated. No Arab effort and certainly no results have ever been shown. The usual phrase, the P.A. "should try harder," if funny, because if implies that the P.A. tries. If Israel is afraid to complain that the P.A. doesn't act against terrorism, why should the P.A. act?

"Peace process," -- and with Hamas? Tell Peres that Hamas' major goal is to conquer Israel. Has he not read its insistence that it will not make peace with Israel?

P.A. CONTINUES DEFAMATION OF ISRAEL

The media controlled by that supposed moderate man of peace, Abbas, aired a program showing a fictionalized account of Israeli soldiers murdering Arab babies (Op. Cit.).

Arutz-7 shows the contradiction between the Western depiction of Abbas and how he acts. Why doesn't the NY Times? Because the Times prefers to mislead people against Israel, and that means favoring the Arabs where they have an opportunity to weaken Israel?

JOSHUA'S ALTAR FOUND?

An Israeli archeologist discovered an ancient Hebrew altar outside Shechem, now called Nablus, exactly as described in the sacred texts. He concluded it was Joshua's, built 3,250 years ago. He makes a good case for that, but even if it weren't Joshua's, it was an early one, attesting to Jewish origins in the country (Ibid.). Nothing early is found there of the Arabs. What do you suppose that means about whose homeland it is?

IRAN RUNNING OUT OF OIL PRODUCTION

By developing nuclear weapons in the name of developing nuclear power, Iran has discouraged investment in its oil industry. As a result, its production is declining. It may have to stop exporting in another decade. Iran cites US pressure on other countries not to help that industry (IMRA, 12/27).

I'm surprised that China, flush with a trade surplus, and eager to scoop up the world's raw materials, doesn't furnish the investment funds. Unfortunately for the US, pressure on Iran reduces supply, raises profits, and makes Islamists stronger and the US, weaker.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

ZION'S MARCH OF FOLLY
Posted by Women in Green, January 26, 2007.

This was written by Sarah Honig and appeared today in the Jerusalem Post.

Israel sadly provides the unimpeachably ultimate illustration for Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly. Ours is a folly so extreme as to jeopardize this nation's very survivability.

For more than 13 years Israel's leaders have made folly their yardstick for sanity and prudence. The more their strategy negates the most basic self-preservation instincts and elementary common sense, the more it's hyped as nothing less than the hallmark of sound-mindedness and wisdom.

Tuchman defined folly as policy which is plainly inimical to the self-interest of the collective pursuing it. Moreover, it has to be implemented over time, not just in one extraordinary flash of irrationality. The folly must be espoused by more than a single misguided figurehead and constitute groupthink. Most significantly, Tuchman's definition hinges on the delivery in advance of cogent warnings against the foreseen impending calamitous consequences of the given folly.

Everything that has happened to Israel since Oslo introduced into our midst the incipient Palestinian state (Tuchman's Trojan horse counterpart), fully measures up to Tuchman's folly criteria (and then some). Indeed the initial folly keeps spawning spin-off follies and the offshoot misguided leadership then begets even more irresponsible fantasy-addicted, consensus-skewing successors.

Ehud Olmert's slipshod and bamboozling ways are Oslo's predictable derivatives. They're evolutions of Osloite delusions -- colossally grotesque progressions of the folly Tuchman identified. Were this suicide-scale folly stopped now, Israelis might heave a united sigh of relief at having barely dodged the fatal bullet. But to read our headlines, this is wishful thinking. If the polls are borne out, we may yet acutely miss Olmert -- unreal as that sounds.

Said polls, for instance, show that the one Kadima character still incomprehensibly popular is Tzipi Livni (notwithstanding, obviously, the dire inadequacy of her foreign policy and abysmally bungled advocacy of Israel's cause). So if the rug is irretrievably pulled from under Olmert's wobbly feet (by, say, the Winograd Commission), Kadima's council of sages may opt to avoid elections by crowning Livni instead. Theoretically -- especially given our parliamentarians' penchant for sleaze -- they may actually pull this travesty off.

It's, therefore, not inconceivable that Livni -- after a mere few kowtowing years in public life -- will be meteorically catapulted to the top, with even fewer qualifications than Olmert, and fewer principles (if that's possible).

In other words, the folly as delineated by Tuchman might yet be even more mind-bogglingly exacerbated. We seem inexorably bound to deteriorate from bad to worse, to beyond-belief worse.

During her junket to Tokyo last week, Livni offered insight into her ethical makeup when taking time (from apparently pitching Israel's case) to laud Dan Halutz for "bringing a high standard of values as an army officer, and we can learn from that, and like that our soldiers too, about taking responsibility. I think his action is worth admiring. I have much respect for the chief of General Staff."

The above -- it need be noted -- was uttered in Livni's native Hebrew, so the jumbled sentence-structure cannot be ascribed to the encumbrances (for her) of English syntax. That said, her supercilious gibberish is most telling. With patronizing self-conferred moral authority, she presumes to enlighten us, and "our soldiers too," that it's above and beyond one's obligation to quit in the wake of failure.

Should Halutz -- by her norms -- have done everything to evade accountability? Does one resign only when no other choice remains (just before the inquiry commission lowers its ax)? Is this intrinsically commendable or deplorable? Why does Livni exude such esteem for a commander who did so much harm (or failed to prevent it) to Israel's military deterrence? Wouldn't it have been more honorable to have stepped down sooner, rather than wait it out as a lame duck with a bunch of lame excuses, hoping against hope to limp through a loophole?

Livni, as Ariel Sharon's fawning accomplice, knows better than the plebeians how Halutz became chief of General Staff and why. She knows his predecessor, Moshe Ya'alon, was kicked out on the eve of disengagement because he wasn't a yes-man and couldn't be absolutely trusted to collaborate in perpetrating Israel's single most tragic folly since Oslo.

But Halutz was Omri Sharon's bosom-bud, a Sharon-family crony and a reliable accessory. He indeed performed the task assigned him to perfection and expelled more than 9,000 compatriots from their homes. He excelled at confronting Jews, but, alas, didn't equally excel at confronting the Jewish state's genocidal enemies.

His appointment and record in office are products of the ideological breakdown that, particularly since Oslo, pollutes this land -- and perniciously so the IDF. Folly marketed as pragmatism took over. That's why Livni conveniently shed her convictions. That's why the IDF was run like a business enterprise, where career and personal advancement matter most.

Thus managerial superficiality, accommodating mediocrity and covering rear ends became indispensable in order not to compromise promotion prospects. Halutz isn't the sacrificial offering. This stock-portfolio ditcher (during combat) epitomizes the malaise.

Livni, disengagement's co-conspirator, does as well. Hence, though she admitted that "disengagement was a mistake" -- one for which she too is liable -- her ministry continues to draw blueprints for another whopping unilateral withdrawal. A team she appointed is currently busy reviving and promoting plans to remove at least 100,000 Israelis from Judea and Samaria. Olmert pleads the same ignorance he did regarding Livni's other recent freelance initiatives.

It's hard to let go of folly and Livni isn't about to, especially when for her folly proved so profitable. Where would she be if she hadn't abandoned her once-professed ideals and enlisted enthusiastically in Zion's lucrative march of folly? In our cynical state, folly may yet take her farther than she dreams and others dread.

Ruth and Nadia Matar established Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green), an activist group of women based in Jerusalem. Their website address is http://www.womeningreen.org

To Go To Top

HEZBOLLAH INSIDE AMERICA: FOX NEWS TELLS ALL IN DOCUMENTARY
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 25, 2007.

It is great that FOX NEWS undertook old fashioned journalistic research to speak about Muslim Terror Cells embedded into American cities and towns, starting a long time ago. FOX has the muscle to probe how all this started. Many free-lance journalists have been writing for years about the U.S. State Department has been the deaf, dumb and blind gate-keeper in allowing Arab Muslims to enter America in deference to Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Egypt, Iran and Iraq under Saddam Hussein. They came in droves, with visas issued by the State Department and even from well-known rogue states.

The investigators stopped short, particularly in Lee Hamilton's mission to study 9/11.

The only one to be questioned was former Secretary of State Colin Powell and that was merely a friendly chat. The matter of State leaning on the FBI to not open investigations into the actions of Arab Muslims was especially notable. I grant you that the Arabist State Department is a fearsome adversary -- something like the FBI Director Herbert Hoover with his blackmailing files on members of Congress and those in the Oval Office.

Please write to FOX News and ask them to pick up their investigations where they left off. Those at State who deliberately opened America's doors for easy entry by Muslim Terror should be pointed out because many are still operating inside and holding the door open for even more Arab Muslim Terrorists. Clearly, the entire lot should be investigated for high treason against the American people. If those Sleeper Cells succeed in blowing up an American city then surely, the death penalty would be applicable to the enablers.

This article was written by David Asman and is called "Hezbollah Inside America: FOX News Tells All in Documentary."

Does any terrorist organization pose a greater threat to Americans than Al Qaeda?

The shocking answer to that question unfolds this Saturday, January 20th, at 8 p.m. EST, as FOX News Channel presents a breakthrough documentary, "Smokescreen: Hezbollah Inside America."

While Americans are still largely focused on Al Qaeda and Usama bin Laden -- who's presumably rotting away in some cave -- the terrorist group Hezbollah has been setting up shop right here in America's heartland. And most Americans don't know a thing about it. But we should know more about Hezbollah -- a lot more.

As tensions with Iran are increasing, it's important to keep in mind that Hezbollah is largely funded by Iran and has operated as its tool in terror operations around the world. As former Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte recently reminded us: "Hezbollah's self-confidence and hostility toward the U.S. as a supporter of Israel could cause the group to increase its contingency planning against U.S. interests."

But Hezbollah has been focused on U.S. interests for quite some time. In fact, Hezbollah operatives have been quietly setting up operations in the U.S. for years.

One of those operations is the subject of "Smokescreen: Hezbollah Inside America," anexhaustive FOX News report about a Hezbollah cell that was operating for several years in Charlotte, North Carolina. FOX followed the many tentacles of this cell, which extended far beyond Charlotte -- to Michigan, to the West Coast, to Canada and to Beirut, Lebanon, where most of the members were from. FOX News spent months tracking this story to all these places and more.

At least one member of the Hezbollah cell first came to the U.S. on forged visa picked up in Venezuela. Others overstayed their tourist or student visas. Once here, they began making millions through a combination of tobacco smuggling, credit card schemes, and arranging phony "green-card" marriages. They even succeeded at obtaining a $1.7 million loan from the Small Business Administration.

Even though the team succeeded in gaming our system and making millions of dollars in criminal enterprises, the FBI was on to them almost from the start.

But this was before 9/11 (and before the Patriot Act) when the FBI was prevented from combining its terrorist surveillance with criminal investigations. A "Chinese Wall" separated criminal investigations from terrorist investigations, so ATF that had launched its own probe into the case, knew nothing of the gang's terrorist connections.

This is just one of the many hurdles the FBI, ATF, state and local law enforcement needed to overcome in bringing this cell down. We highlight their heroic efforts and the flaws in our own system that allowed this terror network to flourish.

Initially, the hardest part of the job for FBI terror investigators was convincing their cohorts that Hezbollah was a genuine threat to Americans. There was much skepticism, despite the fact that before 9/11, no terrorist group had killed more Americans in the Mideast than Hezbollah. And Hezbollah extended their killing spree to this hemisphere, with a 1994 bombing that killed dozens of women and children at a Jewish center in Argentina. But the FBI, as much of the nation, was still in its pre-9/11 mindset, refusing to devote the resources or concern that we should have been devoting to the terrorist threat.

The exceptions to that rule are the heroes of this story: An FBI agent who refused to allow the taunts and skepticism of his colleagues to dissuade him from tracking the connections that linked a group of Lebanese illegals operating in Charlotte to terror cells in Canada and Beirut. An alert sheriff's deputy, working part time at a tobacco wholesaler in Charlotte, who spent his own time tracking down a suspicious group of Arabic-speaking customers who were trading wads of cash for tons of cheap tobacco. A young prosecutor willing to bet his reputation on a case that had to leapfrog over terrorist laws that were either antiquated or hadn't even been written yet.

While arrests were made in this case a year before 9/11, the case was tried just after 9/11, and that brought with it a whole new set of questions that we examine.

Were members of the terror cell too readily convicted by a jury that was still caught up in a post-9/11 panic? Certainly that's the contention of Stanley Cohen, the lawyer for the cell's ringleader, Mohammad Hammoud.

FOX News wanted to find out more about the case. So we got Cohen to take us to Beirut to talk to members of the cell indicted in the case. Only by seeing the volatile environment in which the cell members were raised did we get an appreciation of what motivated them. But we also witnessed why the United States needs to stay vigilant in its efforts to stop those who want to do us harm.

We went to Beirut, and our timing was auspicious. Our visit coincided with an explosive power struggle in Lebanon between Hezbollah and its opponents in government. While we were filming in Hezbollah's stronghold in Southern Beirut, a FOX producer rushed to the scene to tell us that cabinet minister Pierre Gemayel had just been shot and killed in an ambush not far from where we were filming. The decision was made to get out quickly.

The night before the assassination, Cohen appeared shaken after a conversation with Sheik Abbas Harake, a man we were supposed to interview the next day.

According to the U.S. government, Harake was a military commander in Beirut and received money from Mohammad Hammoud, Cohen's client. Harake was the alleged conduit connecting the Charlotte cell to the military wing of Hezbollah. Cohen argued that Harake was just a used car salesman, who ran a humanitarian aid group for Hezbollah. But the night before the assassination, it appeared Harake knew that something was up. He called Cohen to say he couldn't make the interview the next day. "Things are about to get ugly," a nervous Cohen told me after speaking with the sheik.

What makes "Smokescreen: Hezbollah Inside America" particularly relevant today is not merely how it connects with the growing conflicts in the Mideast and our growing conflicts with Iran, but the fact that the case in Charlotte is about to be reopened. In February, the leader of the Charlotte cell, who was sentenced to 155 years in jail, is up for re-sentencing. This story will undoubtedly shed more light on the case and help decide whether this man will ever see the light of day outside of a U.S. prison.

A gripping story that's must see television, "Smokescreen: Hezbollah Inside America"
http://www.foxnews.com/specials/) aired( on January 20th. If you missed it, ask FOX NEWS to air it again.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

ARUTZ-SHEVA ON THE KATZAV ACCUSATION AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Posted by Arutz-Sheva, January 25, 2007.

Editor's note: This is a set of news items in today's Arutz-Sheva. Moshe Katzav, President of Israel, was accused of rape by several women -- some of the incidents going far back in time. It caught the attention of the global mainline media in a way that the corruption charges levied against Prime Minister Olmert have not. Incoming emails from savvy Israelis speculate that -- aside from serving as a distraction from the criminal charges against Olmert and from his announced intention of expelling Jews from Samaria and Judea -- Olmert wants to hand the presidency to Shimon Peres for a final moment of glory. Peres has never been able to be elected to anything on his own.

1. Katzav Rips Into Attorney-General, Media, Police And Prosecution
Hillel Fendel

A first in modern Israeli history: The President of Israel vehemently condemned official national organs, saying they cooperated in targeting him because of his "outsider" status. At times his voice broke, and at other times he was furious with rage, but he showed conviction and firmness throughout his 50-minute speech.

Though the President has claimed innocence ever since the allegations of sexual harassment against him first arose shortly before the summer war with Hizbullah, he has never publicly explained his side of the events. In tonight's dramatic speech, he went further than ever before in doing so.

Particularly noteworthy was his scathing attack against the media, addressing many minutes of his remarks directly to the reporters sitting in front of him.

In addition, he essentially accused Attorney General Menachem Mazuz of lying and double-crossing him. Katzav said that at one point, he and Mazuz held a secret meeting, yet it and its contents were leaked to the media. The President said he called Mazuz to consult with him, and Mazuz said he would neither confirm nor deny the reports. Katzav followed suit, saying publicly that he would neither confirm nor deny - and the next day he heard Mazuz submit a public statement in the Knesset confirming the meeting and its leaked contents.

The headlines blared that the Attorney General contradicted the President's public statement. "He did the opposite of what he had told me on the phone the day before! What was I to do? ... I decided to continue to practice self-restraint and not embarrass Mazuz -- but, I admit, it was not only for that reason; I continued to remain silent so that I would not be accused of interfering with the investigation."

Go to
http://media.iba.org.il/?type=tvRecorded&mediaUrl= http://switch5.castup.net/frames/20040704_IBA_Popup/ iba_video.asp?ai=31ANDSIGNar=ibanews to view the speech.

Excerpts from the speech:

Over the past six months and more, my family and I have faced a poisonous and terrible campaign, with deception and lies reaching every home, trampling me.

Yet despite the humiliation and pressures upon me, for the past six months I respected the law and refrained from responding, in order not to interfere with the investigation... As always in my career, now too, I do not intend to lower my head -- I will struggle until the end; I will wage even a world war, until my soul gives out, to cleanse my stained name.

My wife Gila [voice breaks] is standing by my side, and everyone will soon see the truth.

Citizens of Israel, don't believe the lies that you have heard. I am sure that you too, and Jews all over the world, feel the humiliation...

For the past six months, you have heard the brainwashing from the media. You have heard every day for six months details of the terrible acts of the president of Israel, hair-raising stories as if they are facts. You have seen irresponsible commentators standing and explaining, without fulfilling their basic responsibility of checking the most basic things. You therefore had no choice but to be influenced by them; you couldn't think otherwise.

I know no one else who could have survived this period, but I did - [knocking on table] -- because I know the truth. In Israel 2007, it seems there is no need in this for proofs or for evidence; it's enough just to hear one side; my fate was decreed even before I could say one word. Not one of you [reporters] has seen one shred of evidence against me. There is no evidence against me.

But you in the press did not allow the facts to bother you. You did not stop for a second to ask yourselves if maybe the accusations are not true. Not one of you asked questions; not one of you -- not one radio or TV or newspaper -- did an investigative piece to see if it's true. You transgressed all journalist ethics!

I know what bothered you -- that six years ago I was elected President [defeating Shimon Peres]. You wrote at the time that it was the end of Zionism, etc. I should be ashamed of myself? You should be ashamed of yourselves for writing such things about a democratic vote in the legislature!

---At this point, a Channel Two news anchor interrupted, and Katzav responded furiously:

You have talked for six months, and now it's my turn! No, you won't talk here! If you don't like it, you can get out! I was silent for six months, and now you don't want to hear the truth! Channel Two -- yes, Channel Two, the same station that has been spilling my blood for six months! The same Channel Two that set an interview with the President of Israel for a specific day, and then just a day before the interview, decided to cancel it -- and why? Because it decided that Muhammad Dahlan was more important to them than the President of Israel -- that's the same Channel Two that doesn't like to hear the difficult things I am accusing them of now.

Yes, it's the same media of which one journalist wrote that when I was elected President, he felt as bad as he felt the day that Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin was murdered. Can you understand this comparison, citizens of Israel? If this does not sully the memory of Yitzchak Rabin, then what does? ...

When the truth comes out, citizens of Israel, you will be hit by shock. I wouldn't take a chance on saying this so clearly if I wasn't so confident of the truth that you do not know.

I have been in public service for over 35 years; I have never hurt a single man or woman, my hands were clean, even when my opponents did all they could to besmirch me.

I saw myself as a symbol of all those who do not belong to the elitist, ego-swollen clique of those who were born with a silver spoon in their mouths, who see themselves as the only ones worthy of representing the public!

For years, the press looked all over the place for something with which to besmirch me, but thank G-d, they found nothing. They went as far back as my 2nd grade school! But they found zero, they failed; they found nothing. I cannot understand where this hatred comes from, this urge to devour, that takes over the sense of truth and justice.

To my great sorrow, I was unable to stop the urge for vengeance and anger by those who worked with me for many years -- and they waited for the right time to take vengeance.

I never thought that those who were fired by me or who didn't get what they wanted from me would accuse me of acts that are so far from me, from my tradition, from my way of life, and from how I educate my children. I did not do one of the acts of which I am accused.

I am proud of my family for standing by me at this difficult hour. But they are a normal family, and not made of iron.

I promise you, citizens of Israel, that it will never be listed in history that the 8th president is guilty of these crimes.

I admit that I would like to resign now; you have succeeded in taking away the joy of serving in this honorable position. It would be easy for me to quit. I am tired of this witch hunt. But the alternative is to surrender. I refuse to give in to blackmail and lies.

The police set itself a target of convicting a President of the State -- yes, this is true. They did this because the police knew it would be popular in the eyes of the media.

Not one of you -- no journalists, no politicians, not even my lawyers -- have seen the evidence. I know the truth. The evidence is on my side, the truth is on my side.

If the Attorney General decides to indict me -- and he has not yet decided to do so; he wrote that he is open to any decision. But if he decides to do so, I affirm again that I will resign immediately, as I said in court on Nov 27.

I also said that if he says that he is considering an indictment, I will suspend myself -- and that's what I did today in a letter to the Knesset...

But I ask you what should a man do if he knows he's clean, the Attorney General has not decided, and it's all a libel -- should he give up and quit just because of a media lynch? No. I will not cooperate with anyone who wants to execute someone without a trial. You want to execute someone without a trial -- do so; I will not cooperate.

McCarthyism has been revived here in Israel. And one of the worst dangers is the cooperation between the police and media. In any normal country, the media are the last line of defense for a citizen who demands simple justice and basic civil rights. When the police persecute people in a totalitarian country, the media rises to protect him. But here the media and the police work together, leak to each other -- and the civil rights of the citizens are trampled. Where are the bleeding hearts? Why don't they raise their voice against this injustice?

Katzav's Version

I started this whole story last July by inviting on my own volition the Attorney General, without any lawyer or anything else -- because I knew I had done nothing wrong. I went to complain about an attempt to blackmail me. Would a normal person who did something wrong go to the Attorney General and say he is being blackmailed?!

I advised him to place a gag order, so there could be a fair investigation. But this was not done for even one minute -- and there were leaks all the time. There were leaks from the prosecution and from the police and from everywhere -- just one side didn't leak, and that was me -- the President of Israel, Moshe Katzav.

Only Gila and I knew of the meeting with Mazuz, yet within a short time, it was leaked to the press, including the contents of the meeting. I called Mazuz, and told him that the meeting had been leaked. He said he would not confirm or deny -- and I did the same. And then I find that Mazuz releases an official statement confirming the meeting -- the opposite of what he told me the day before. And then editorials appeared accusing me of lying, and calling, "Moshe Katzav, tell the truth!"

Ladies and gentlemen, no charge has ever been filed against me in the police! Not from 12 women, and not from one!

The police actively and ravenously sought out dozens of women to see if they would accuse me of something. They went back to all the women I had ever worked with in the past 30 years. One non-right-wing female MK said that her friend was summoned and asked by the police if she had ever been raped by the president!

Out of dozens that were investigated, three of them raised the worst charges. But those three wanted to work here -- and I didn't think they were worthy of doing so. They wanted the prestige of working with the President, but I had worked with them in the past and knew that they weren't appropriate. All three of them wanted to work here!

And they never filed any complaint against me with the police -- but when the police came to them, they saw it as a chance to get back at me. One of them was the head of an office when I was a minister, and I didn't want her to work here. Another was the one who tried to blackmail me, and when the police asked her about it, she used a disgraceful defense, saying, "He's complaining against me? I'll get him back! I'll accuse him of rape!"

We have evidence against two of them that they said outright they wanted to get me back and that they would take vengeance on me.

Regarding eight women about whom the police leaked to you -- I was not even interrogated about sexual harassment regarding them.

One of them tried to spread terrible rumors about me -- about an illegitimate child -- yes, that's what she said -- and about foreign accounts, and wiretapping my employees, and money for pardons, and affairs with women. But you know how sensitive I always was to the media throughout my career, and they knew that as well, and they knew it would be easy to malign me.

I tell you now: Ten thousand pardon requests passed through my office, and if you can find even one that I did not handle responsibly, I will resign right now.

Against the Police

As early as last October, the police announced that they could open a case against me -- but the investigation has lasted another four months!

The police constantly leaked information, encouraged the media to spill my blood. The press campaign was orchestrated from the first minute.

Against the advice of my lawyers, I told them to transfer to the police all the evidence in my possession. They told me not to, so as not to divulge our defense tactics. But I said that I trust the police, and I forced them to transfer the information to make it easier for the police to reach the truth. What did the police do? Everything they could to tear down the testimonies that could have been used in my favor.

The legal counsel of the President's House -- she was a former Lt.-Col. in the army, and the head of an IDF Military Court -- has been lying sick for four months because of the humiliating police investigation! I cannot agree to such standards! And she says that they looked only to incriminate the president.

Similarly, the Director of the President's House, Moshe Goral, was hospitalized after a humiliating 11-hour investigation that took place even when he was sick.

There was a woman who wrote to me who said, "You don't know me, but eight years ago you fired me, and I know who the woman is who is accusing you -- and I know that she's lying. I talked to her, and I know the truth." We gave the letter to the police and the Prosecution, and what do the police say to her? "We are following you with a magnifying glass, and we will get into your underwear, so watch out." - A hareidi woman with three children! This is how the police talks to a woman who wants to tell the truth?! They threaten her in this way? Is this a democratic state? Are these the standards we want to have here in our country?!

Another witness was told by the police to "watch out for your family." What right do they have to act this way?

I have great faith in the Israel Police, and I don't want to harm it, but these faults must be revealed. And witnesses must also be protected, even if they don't follow the direction set by the police. The police set a goal of convicting the President of the country, because they knew the media would like it.

This media lynch even influenced those who make the decisions. Why did Attorney General Mazuz have to say as early as October to announce that he had "doubts" about my innocence? What made him say that so many months ago, before all the material was ready? He could have been silent and said he's waiting for the end of the investigation -- but no. He was widely quoted about how he doubts my story.

Isn't it obvious that such a statement would influence the investigators? If the Attorney General doesn't believe the president, then why should we? It also influenced everyone else, including the witnesses. After all, the Attorney General already set the tone!

At one point, the police wanted some evidence from my house -- and they came with search warrants and orders. Why couldn't they just come and take what they wanted? Would someone have dared to stop them? But this was just another method of the police to humiliate me and harass me and report to the media that they had "raided the President's Residence."

Those who accused me of sexual harassment wanted just to harass me, and to defend themselves from charges of blackmail. A woman who is harassed doesn't bring the harasser gifts, or write him notes of appreciation, or repeatedly try to come back and work with him, or call the harasser from New York at 3 AM to wish him a happy birthday.

The whole case against me is not supported by any concrete evidence. As High Court Justice Dalia Dorner said, 'I cannot believe that someone has to prove his innocence!' Well, I will prove my innocence.

And those of you reporters who preach at me -- I have succeeded in maintaining my marriage for 37 years. Many of you [reporters] who preach at me have not succeeded in maintaining your family life. I hope that my children and grandchildren have the same marriage relationship, and they wish upon themselves, that Gila and I have...

"O G-d, save me from the evil man, preserve me from the violent man, who devises evil in their hearts and stir up wars every day. They have sharpened their tongues like a snake... The proud have hidden a snare for me." (Psalm 140)

Thank you very much.
 

2. Media Mounts Counterattack; Public Supports President´s Speech
By Gil Ronen

Israel's media outlets were quick to mount a counteroffensive against President Moshe Katzav, who sharply criticized them in his speech Wednesday night. The Israeli public expresses its support.

The President's spokesperson, Hagit Cohen, said Wednesday morning that the outpouring of support for the President is unprecedented. "In my three years in this position as spokesperson, I have never seen such a deluge of expressions of support as now. The switchboard at the president's residence is collapsing from calls of solidarity, as is the fax machine."

Cohen further noted that the president's words entered the hearts of the public. "Many citizens particularly identify with President Katzav's criticism of the Israeli media," she noted.

In his speech, Katzav directly confronted Channel 2 -- Israel TV's leading, semi-private channel -- and its newscasters.

Obviously shaken by Katzav's offensive, media anchors made no attempt to feign objectivity, as they launched their counter attack. For close to an hour on prime time TV, the media had been under attack, and they had no way of cutting off the President, ganging up on him or censoring him as is custom on talk shows or pre-recorded reports.

The President, who was in control on his home turf at the official President's Residence, successfully managed to shut up an attempt by Channel 2's lead anchor Sukenik to interrupt his speech. In a dramatic verbal clash, Katzav silenced Sukenik's outbreak and when Sukenik continued interrupting, a member of the President's staff wrestled with the Channel 2 crew over control of their microphone.

Channel 1 TV's lead anchor Geula Even expressed indignation in a prime time panel featuring ultra-leftists Talia Sasson, formerly a top official in the State Prosecution, and MK Zehava Galon (Meretz). Geula Even chastised the President for "terrible incitement against the media" and "talking above the heads of the media for an entire hour and bypassing the journalists and Sukenik."

Geula Even asked Yossi Bar Muha, head of the Israel Journalists Union, if the president hadn't "lynched the media", and expressed shock by Katzav's hints that some of Israel's media members were less successful in maintaining their family life than his "37-year successful marriage." Bar Muha said Katzav was a liar, and declared that he knew for a fact that Katzav was guilty of the sexual charges against him.

The main editorial in the ultra-leftist Haaretz news service calls for the forced removal of the president Thursday morning. Ynet, Israel's most popular Hebrew news site, features a commentary quoting anonymous sources saying the president's speech was "riddled with untruth" and an opinion piece entitled "The Protocols of Moshe" by Guy Banyuvich. "In a horror show presented in broken Hebrew," wrote Banyuvich, "the President laid a row of explosive devices along the avenues of law and justice in Israel and set them off one by one." Banyuvich went on to compare Katzav's speech to the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Baruch Gordon contributed to this report.
 

3. Knesset House Committee Okays Katzav Suspension, 13-11
By Hana Levi Julian

The Knesset House Committee voted 13-11 Thursday to approve President Moshe Katzav's request for a temporary suspension from his duties. Knesset Speaker Dalia Itzik is now acting president. Katzav asked Knesset Speaker Dalia Itzik for permission to suspend himself until after the preliminary hearing to determine whether he will be charged on a variety of sexual misconduct and corruption charges.

A two-hour recess called by Knesset House Committee Chairwoman Ruhama Avraham of the Kadima party (pictured) to discuss the matter with faction heads ended abruptly one hour later, however, after failing to convince the members to reach a consensus.

Some of the committee members remained unmoved and insisted that the Knesset should initiate proceedings to have Katzav forcibly removed from office, but others were equally adamant that the president should be given a chance to defend himself rather than suffer a conviction in the media.

Knesset member Yitzhak Galantee (Gil Pensioners Party) argued in favor of Katzav's request, comparing the media campaign against the president to the Dreyfus trial, calling it "intolerable and inhumane."

Galantee said, "Katzav promised that if charges are pressed against him, he will submit his resignation immediately. What more do we want from him? That he should wrap the noose around his neck? His appearance was that of a man who has been hurt to the depths of his soul and who speaks from his heart, not that of a man who seeks a legal fig leaf to cover his private parts."

Galantee reminded the committee members of the serious charge that the president leveled at the police investigators: The president said that a female witness for the defense told him that the police threatened her, saying, "We will get into your underwear" to discourage her from testifying.

"Is this not obstruction of the investigation on the part of the police themselves?" he asked. Galantee said that the only logical conclusion is to accept the president's request for temporary suspension and enable him to have a preliminary hearing after which the attorney general will decide whether to press charges."

Knesset legal advisor Nurit Elstein, on the other hand, told the committee that the most appropriate action would be for the President to resign.

Nonetheless, a slim majority of the committee members agreed with arguments that legislators should not judge the President -- and that he should decide on his own to resign rather than be impeached.

Knesset Members led by Yoram Marciano (Labor) and Zahava Gal-On (Meretz) collected 30 signatures a day earlier on a petition demanding that the Knesset House Committee begin proceedings to remove President Moshe Katzav from office, based on Attorney General Menachem Mazuz's statement that he is considering putting Katzav on trial for rape and other charges.

Katzav, however, beat the MKs to the House Committee, and managed to file his own request for a temporary suspension first, thus pre-empting a committee vote on whether or not to impeach him.

Gal-On called Katzav's request to suspend himself "a slap in the face of the Knesset" and "a poor joke". She said that the crimes that he is being investigated for are so grave that he must be removed completely through impeachment.

MK Michael Eitan (Likud) said in the Knesset committee that the Attorney General has not yet made up his mind whether to press charges against the president. "Who are we, Knesset members who have not seen the evidence and testimonies, to begin impeachment proceedings out of hysteria, when no charges have been brought against the president?"

Eitan said that for such a scenario, in which there is a suspicion of crimes, where the accused president claims innocence, and in which the one person authorized to view the evidence that has mounted and decide if it is sufficient to press charges has not reached a conclusion, we have in the law the measure for temporary suspension.

Among those on the House Committee openly supporting the president's request for a temporary suspension were the three Shas party Knesset members, the three Kadima Knesset members, the two Pensioners Party MKs, MK Nadia Hilu of Labor, the representative of the Arab Democratic Party, the United Torah Judaism Knesset member, and the two Knesset members of Yisrael Beiteinu. Some Knesset members said that they had decided to support the President's request following his emotional speech Wednesday night.

Baruch Gordon contributed to this report.
 

4. Corrupt Elite Decried at Herzliya Conference
By Ezra HaLevi

The high level of government corruption and the influence of Israel's wealthiest families on the functions of the state were the hot topics on the last day of the Herzliya Conference.

Globes business news editor Hagai Golan told those present that the fact that a Market Watch pole released this week shows that 86 percent of the country believes that wealthy businessmen control the government "leaves no room for doubt -­ we live in a corrupt country."

Golan said that though the wealthy elite in Israel are important for the country's national strength, "they should not be above the national enforcement bodies -­ this is the root of much of the problem."

"What happened to us? What has gone wrong?" asked journalist Ari Sharit. His answer was one that previous speakers such as State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss had alluded to. "What went wrong is Israel's leadership echelon. The Israeli public is an extraordinary one, but the Israeli elites have lost their way through the decades. Our political elite has become unfit. It does not need a cosmetic change, but an implant -­ during the war and since the war. Even the academic elite does not contribute. The legal elite tried to maintain balances and didn't always succeed. The media elite failed, showing the public a false picture in the 90s, improved slightly since then, but still is not fulfilling its duties."

Shavit, who penned a cynical faux-memo on the eve of elections from the "eighteen families" who run most of Israel's commerce and media, spent much of the time lambasting Israel's richest families. "The business elite, which is so impressive in its work with the economy, have failed to grasp the political situation Israel find itself in."

The seasoned journalist, who soured on the Disengagement and became an outspoken critic of the Kadima phenomenon, was not all doom and gloom. "I am an optimistic man. I don't just love this people, I believe in it. I don't just love this crazy country, I believe in it."

Former Knesset Member and founder of the Shinui Party Amnon Rubinstein, speaking on the same panel on Israeli patriotism as Shavit, said that the fact that Israelis don't leave during wartime, despite the relatively low cost of emigration and ease of obtaining a visa, was an example of Israeli patriotism.

Shavit presented a vision of a more passionate patriotism, directing his hope away from the coastal plain and toward Israel's periphery. "The development towns, the agricultural communities and the settlements are where the loyalty lies," he said. "It is amazing that the very people the state neglects most are those who remain faithful to the state. There is a certain type of Jewish identity that cannot be defined that is alive there." Comment on this story
 

5. Olmert Slams Katzav, Hopes For Sharon Revival and Warns Iran
By Ezra HaLevi

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert called upon President Moshe Katzav to resign and addressed the Iranian threat in his address before the Herziliya Conference Wednesday evening.

The prime minister spoke following a panel on government corruption that referred to many specifics of the criminal allegations against him and his government. Immediately preceding his speech, however, was the televised address of President Moshe Katzav, which provided him the opportunity to play the prosecutor rather than the prosecuted.

"I cannot speak tonight without referring to the events of the past day, and the Attorney General's decision to hold a hearing for the President in light of the possibility that serious charges may be filed against him. In these circumstances, I have no doubt that the President cannot continue to fulfill his role and he should leave the President's Residence. This is a sad day for the State of Israel," Olmert said.

He went on to express his hope that Ariel Sharon "would return to us."

Olmert focused on Iran for the remainder of his speech, offering a run-down of diplomatic moves his government has been taking against Iran's nuclear program. He cited his recent visit to China and took credit for the United Nations resolutions aimed against Iran. "We know our efforts had much influence in this regard," he said.

"Those who believe, as we do, that a diplomatic solution is preferable, must exert pressure to bring about change in the near future," he said. "Dragging our feet at this point ... will only make harsher steps more necessary in the future. Iran is vulnerable and susceptible to international pressure in this regard despite its defiant and belligerent public declarations."

Olmert urged the international community to act so Israel does not have to. "At this stage, there is still time -- though not unlimited -- to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power that will threaten its adversaries, first and foremost Israel," he said. "Israel is not spearheading the struggle against this threat. It must be dealt with first and foremost by the superpowers and other key countries. We are working to try to place this on the top of the agenda of world leaders."

The prime minister stressed, though, that Israel would not rely on the world to protect it. "The Jewish people, upon whose consciousness the scars of the Holocaust are deeply engraved cannot afford to ignore those who want to destroy us. In the past, the world remained silent and the results are known. Our role is to prevent the world from repeating this mistake," Olmert said. "When the leader of a country announces, officially and publicly, his country's intention to wipe off the map another country, and creates those tools which will allow them to realize their stated threat, no nation has the right to weigh its position on the matter. This is an obligation of the highest order, to act with all force against this plot."

In a direct message to the people of Iran, who would presumably be negatively impacted by an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear sites, Olmert recalled past Israeli-Iranian cooperation. "We have nothing against the Iranian people," he said. "Prior to the takeover of Iran we had impressive and warm relations under the Shah."

Olmert concluded with an explicit assurance that Israel will reserve the military option should diplomacy leave Iran with nuclear weapons. "We have the right and freedom of defensive actions in defense of our interests," he said. "Nobody should misconstrue our hesitation for reluctance to defend the State of Israel ...There is no difference between right, left and center in this regard -- and the people stand united as well."
 

6. Nascant Presidential Campaign Issue: Pardon For Barghouti
By Ezra HaLevi

Candidates vying for the still-occupied position of president are being asked whether the will approve a request to pardon terror chief Marwan Barghouti, serving life-sentences for murder.

MK Reuven Rivlin (Likud), considered a likely winner over Shimon Peres, has already been approached by several foreign diplomats on the matter. "A number of ambassadors from European countries -- separately, and not in coordination with one another -- asked to meet Likud MK Reuven Rivlin," reported analyst Yossi Verter in Haaretz. "All addressed an identical question to Rivlin: 'If you are chosen president, how will you act if you are asked to pardon the prisoner Marwan Barghouti, the leader of the Tanzim?'"

Verter says that Rivlin told the ambassadors "what they had been hoping to hear. 'If the government and the justice minister make a diplomatic decision that this is the individual with whom they want to negotiate, I will not stand in their way. I will sign the pardon.'"

Shimon Peres has declared unequivocally that he would pardon Barghouti. He is lobbying hard to force a public vote after an embarrassing defeat in his race against Katzav, which was decided by secret ballot in the 120-seat Knesset.

"All the candidates are competing as to who will release Barghouti faster," Verter quoted an unnamed leftist MK saying.

The preoccupation with a prisoner serving time for dozens of counts of murder indicates that a deal has already been, or is close to being formulated. The plan would presumably entail the release of Barghouti in exchange for IDF Cpl. Gilad Shalit or a promise of Hamas or Fatah moderation. Barghouti might then agree to make an Israeli withdrawal to the lines delineated by the Partition Wall bilateral.

MK Haim Oron (Meretz) has been in regular contact with Barghouti, holding meetings in his jail cell and shuttling back and forth to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office. Olmert's office staff admits that Olmert and his advisers hold regular meetings with Oron but insist that messages to or from Barghouti have never been conveyed.

The Mattot Arim Land of Israel activist group, led by Susie Dym, has begun working to pressure candidates to commit to keeping Barghouti behind bars. "We need to ask all MKs on the right to refuse to vote for Rivlin unless he gives a written commitment not to release Barghouti, convicted for taking part in the murder of at least five innocent people -- and possibly many more," Dym wrote in a recent communiqu?.

She urged activists to fax and call the heads of the Shas and Yisrael Beiteinu parties, urging them to condition their presidential vote on whether a candidate will commit not to release Barghouti. "Shas Chairman Eli Yishai's office can be called at 02 666 2252 or faxed 02 666 2909; Yisrael Beiten'u can be reached at 02-6408388. For more information, email: mattot.arim[at]gmail.com

Hillel Fendel is senior editor at Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNN.com).

To Go To Top

EGYPT WANTS ISRAELI TERRITORY; INJUSTICE IN JUDEA; NONSENSE IN THE NEWS
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 25, 2007.

COULD EGYPT STOP THE ARMS SMUGGLING INTO GAZA?

There are a limited number of openings between Gaza and Sinai. Why doesn't Egypt station enough police at those openings, and examine the goods flowing into Gaza? It should be easy to detect and confiscate arms that smugglers try to bring in.

Egypt's failure to do that indicates complicity in the smuggling.

SOME EGYPTIAN OFFICIALS DEMANDING EILAT

One cannot settle disputes with Muslim Arabs and make peace with them. Not satisfied with having gotten from Israel the Sinai, which is several time the size of Israel, some Egyptian officials are claiming Eilat, Israel's only outlet to Africa. Egypt is lucky to have gotten the Sinai. It was not officially Egyptian territory; it was no-man's land. Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty recognizing the boundary between the two countries. But the Muslims keep opening new controversies. That is why it pays not to give them concessions. Concessions in hand, they raise new demands.

TRUTH REPRESSED IN DEMOCRACY

We in the West are supposed to have a democracy. But we do not decide critical issues democratically. A democratic ethos welcomes debate, but Western society doesn't. People don't like dissent. The gatekeepers of the mass-media censor views contrary to their own or what they think politically correct (which usually is what liberals value).

Those of us who are familiar with historical events perceive similar conditions now. We have learned about consequences and what works. The rest don't listen to our warnings. They don't question their sources or realize that they all are of a single ideology. Having no idea how biased their sources are, they accept what they are told, rather than analyze it. They don't know what they don't know. They think that having college degrees means they are educated. (Of course, bias goes beyond the liberals.)

They are like the Israeli ruling group before the 1973 war. Clues about a pending Arab invasion were submitted to it. Instead of checking their theory that the Arabs did not want, and could not wage, another war, and not having spies observing newly developed Arab military tactics, they rejected the clues as incompatible with their theory. They should have questioned their theory on the basis of incompatible clues. As a result, they were caught by surprise. Initially, the Arab assault succeeded.

Americans want to believe that all religions are benign, so they ignore facts to the contrary. They contradict themselves, by condemning Christianity and Judaism and exempting Islam. They blind themselves to the Islamic assault, even as Muslims make war in one country after another.

A recently opened front is Somalia. The Islamists had captured most of the country, when Ethiopia, with US encouragement, helped the non-Islamists recapture the country. Will Pres. Bush get deserved credit for playing a role in not letting that country fall to our enemies? Since half the Islamists fled, the eventual outcome is uncertain. The present victory against jihad may be temporary.

UNPROTECTING ITALY'S JEWS

The Vatican demanded that Israel turn over parts of Mt. Zion to it. Summoned to the Vatican, PM Olmert was told that if he refused, Italy would remove police protection from Jewish institutions. The Muslims would do the rest. Think that is crazy? That was the policy of Mandatory Britain, that led to pogroms.

Indeed, Italian police that had been guarding Jewish institutions for a decade, after Muslim attacks on some of them, soon were withdrawn without notice or explanation. After protest, they were restored, but the point had been made. (Subsequent news bulletins stated that negotiations over Mt. Zion were proceeding "satisfactorily.")

Olmert refused to object at his meeting with the Italian Premier, because he said, it went well. Upon Olmert's return home, he offered terrorist leader Abbas $100 million and removed most of the subsidy from religious schools in Israel (restored after protest). This seems part of the war on the Jews. Israelis should mount a coup (Barry Chamish).

What good is a Jewish state if it doesn't protect fellow Jews? Worse, it harasses them.

UNBLOCKING ROADBLOCKS

"PM Ehud Olmert approved a proposal to remove 27 West Bank roadblocks...the prime minister said that security officials still must determine which roadblocks would be dismantled and when they would be removed." In that case, asks Dr. Lerner, how did they come up with the number 27, if they had not determined which ones should be dismantled? Seems like an arbitrary number (IMRA, 12/25).

UNCORKED BORDER

Hundreds of Hamas terrorists have passed through the now unguarded border gates between Gaza and Egypt. They go for advanced military training in Iran (IMRA, 12/25).

Hundreds! Abbas doesn't stop them, though he is given arms by the US and Israel to fight Hamas. Hint: he has other uses for those arms, such as fighting Israel.

Egypt easily could guard its side of the border. Why doesn't it stop the terrorists?

INJUSTICE IN JUDEA

Israeli police in Hebron grabbed a 15-year-old Jewish girl off the street. Without notifying her parents, they interrogated her in Hebron and then in Jerusalem. They were inquiring about her having demonstrated against judicial callousness towards some friends, a year and-a-half ago. When she stopped answering their questions, they let her go. She asked, how is she supposed to get home to another city? They said that's her problem; their duty is simply to release her.

Fortunately, a neighbor was in the vicinity, and took her home. She experienced government harassment against religious Jews or settlers in the so-called Jewish state. It is one of many police state tactics in Israel (Arutz-7).

NONSENSE IN THE NEWS

"Good guy" Abbas asked Israel for a ceasefire, asserting that all P.A. factions agreed to it. Not all did, however. They launched dozens of rockets against Israel, without "good guy" Abbas intervening. The Foreign Minister of Egypt deplored the attacks, and hoped that Israel would continue to restrain itself (i.e., not defend itself).

The government of Israel finally states that it will retaliate. The Hamas government called the decision "aggression." (Steven Erlinger, NY Times, 12/29, A6).

Abbas lies about his territory's factions agreeing to a ceasefire. He requests it in accordance with Islamist doctrine. That doctrine is, when losing, ask for a truce during which the Muslims can rebuild shattered forces. Meanwhile, however, the Muslims have been breaking the ceasefire. That is customary. Israel did not return fire, giving the Arabs time to consolidate the ceasefire. That is customary, too. But the Arabs, as usual, did not consolidate it. They hold themselves above the law and their cause above their word. They keep firing and demanding enemy restraint.

Egypt deplores the attacks, and hopes for continued Israeli restraint. A lot of good Egyptian deploring does, while Egypt lets arms be brought into Gaza and lets terrorists out for training! What good does restraint do Israel? Israel is supposed to suffer bombardment passively. When it doesn't, the rest of the world rebukes it much more strongly than it does the Arabs' aggression. Then the Muslims call Israeli retaliation "aggression."

Abbas serves the Arab aggression. What good has he done? Why bolster him in a pretense that he is a positive force, when like Arafat he builds his military while using diplomacy as a weapon, in this case like handcuffs for Israel? Why does Israel bother discussing matters with Egypt as if Egypt were part of the solution instead of the arms supplier and diplomatic backer of jihad?

Does PM Olmert expect Israel to retain any credibility when he allows a bombardment to go on for weeks, in violation of the ceasefire, boasting of restraint as his country's houses get demolished and the children become neurotic, and threatening retaliation but giving the Arabs weeks fire away and to rearm, and even offers concessions in the name of humanitarian aid for that inhumane people, concessions that facilitate terrorism. Don't pity the people who vote for genocidal terrorists, I say.

Note that Israel didn't surprise the enemy by retaliation. As usual, it stated a decision to retaliate, but doesn't connect decisions with action. It would be wiser to bring up its objections within two days of Arab violations, challenging the world to explain why it should honor an agreement the Arabs are violating by killing its people. Then strike.

It's like this. I, the Muslim don't like you, but shake your hand and agree to stop fighting with you. I punch you and call it "resistance." You make a fist, but I remind you of the agreement not to fight. Your mother tells you not to fight back, show restraint. I slap you. My friend (Egypt) deplores my action, but gives me brass knuckles and hopes you continue to show restraint. When you finally strike back, I call your action "aggression."

The "news" all is nonsense, repeated many times, but still taken seriously without anyone in that newspaper or perhaps in all the major media making fun of it, as I just did.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

JEWS RIGHT TO SOVEREIGNTY -- MUSLIM ARABS RIGHT TO MURDER?
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 25, 2007.

At 3 AM I watched the news. I clicked to a station featuring the Spielberg/Kushner rendition of the Munich massacre and retaliation. Frankly, I was reluctant to watch, given that the writer, Tony Kushner has a reputation for being hostile to Israel but, I watched anyway.

The plot of hunting down the 11 Arab Muslims who created and carried out the massacre of Jews at the Munich Olympics was familiar -- but, the ending where Avner the team's leader questions the logic of hunting down the killers, started me thinking along a broader line.

Why should anyone question the right of Jews to retaliate for the murder of Jews or even pre-empt the planned murder of Jews? We frequently hear the twisted logic of the Arab Muslims who claim they have the right to kill Jews because of what they call the "Nakba" (catastrophe). That refers to the first defensive war the Jews had to fight when the new Jewish State of Israel declared her independence.

The Arab Muslims were offered a "partition" of the land remaining after the British cut off 78% of the original "Palestinian Mandate" which they had declared was a homeland for the Jews to enter and create a country for the return of exiled and oppressed Jews from all over the world. But, the Arab Muslims refused and 5 Arab countries sent their armies to attack and annihilate the nascent Jewish State of 600,000 Jews.

The Jews came to live, farm, make the sandy, rocky soil green. The Arab Muslims pledged outright to "drive the Jews into the [Mediterranean] Sea" and "dance in the blood of the Jews". As is common among the Arab Muslims for generations, they flocked into Palestine where the Jews were developing the land, creating jobs, health care and education for both Jews and Arabs.

They were glad for the work and the money, generally unavailable in Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, etc. But, they still hated the Jews and stole whatever they could. Some were worse than others and they murdered any Jews caught alone and vulnerable. Now the Arabs demand lands they gambled away in 6 wars. In each war they intended to wipe out all the Jews just as they had pledged in the first war. As the Muslim Arab says to Avner, "We can wait to one hundred years to take over all the Lands the Jews occupy ".

Apologists for the Arab Muslims invariably pressed the Israelis to give up their Land to the Arabs as if it were their right to claim. Never did the apologists speak about the thousands of Jews killed in these wars -- each started by the Arabs to recover not only the Land they had gambled away by losing each war but, also their lost pride of losing to those whom they believed to be a contemptible enemy.

Their leaders stubbornly stuck to their doctrine of the "Three No-s". At an Arab Muslim Conference August 1967 in Khartoum. After the armies of 3 neighboring Arab Muslim counties attacked, the Israeli Jews had won the Six Days War, secured Judea and Samaria, the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights and reunited their Eternal Capital of Jerusalem. The Israelis were already reaching out to negotiate with Gamal Abdul Nasser of Egypt and King Hussein of Jordan based on Land-for-Peace. But, Arab Muslims stubbornly stuck by their response at their Summit conference the famous three NO's: "No recognition, no negotiation, no peace." (1)

I thought back to past times where the predatory attitude of non-Jews was virtually identical. Wherever Jews lived, the non-Jewish populace was taught and prodded to attack. That includes the Arab Muslim countries where Jews had lived for hundreds of years as well as Europe. Jews were periodically subjected to murderous pogroms in Europe, Russia and the Muslim Arab Middle East. The concept that Jews in Muslim countries lived in a "Golden Age" with peaceful Muslims from the 7th Century to the founding of the Jewish State of Israel is completely false.

Islamic laws put Jews and Christians into a category of "people of the book" a Dhimmi (second class citizen). Muslim Laws were repressive against "people of the book". Jews had to wear distinctive marks on their clothing, could not have their heads above a Muslim's; their homes and synagogues had to be lower than a Muslim's. If they passed a Muslim on the street, they had to step down into the gutter which was a sewer. if a Jewish child's father died before it was thirteen, the child was taken to be raised as a Muslim. Jews could not be witness in court against a Muslim, therefore, they had no defense against Muslim accusations. Jews could not carry a defensive weapon, even a knife, so they had to pay the Muslim regime for their "protection". This was an onerous "jizya" tax which, when paid, they were supposed to slapped in the face to indicate their lowliness. This then was basically the life of a "Dhimmi", a Jew or Christian in an Arab Muslim country.

Periodically, their leaders incited their people to riot against the Jews. If times were bad, Jews were used to distract the other people. If the leaders were benevolent, times were better. But, the Golden Age? Not really. The concept of containing the Jews and keeping them separate in what came to be known as Ghettos became common in most regimes. Although out of sight in their Ghettos, the people were incited usually by the head of the regimes, kings, dictators of some sort in the Muslim countries -- by the Church in Europe. The people would break into the Jewish ghettos to rage, rape, pillage, and murder.

What exactly had the Jews done to anger the church, the aristocracy and the peasantry in both the Christian and Muslim worlds? What kept this hatred boiling after thousands of years? What had the Jews dared to do that inspired so visceral a hatred? Could it be that is simple and basic as bringing to the attention of the human race that there was only one G-d? That this one G-d demanded that all mankind keep G-d's laws? That this one G-d demanded that all mankind keep laws that restrained their more basic and primitive instincts? That these annoying laws produced a feeling of guilt when they ignored G-d's Ten Commandments and 613 other laws ("mitzvot" -- good deeds)? But, only Jews had to observe these laws while all others were to minimally observe what was known as the Noahide laws of human and humane behavior.

Was being the messenger of G-d's Word perceived by all others that Jews had the inside track (so to speak) with this one G-d? That Jews were the "head-of-the-line" for what all humans hoped for: Life after Death? The Jews never made such a claim nor were they mandated to seek out others to convert into the Covenant which the Jews made with the One G-d. They were, however, obligated to follow the law and, by example, be a "Light unto the Nations".

So presumably, their crime was to first bring a single G-d, to the attention of all men displacing the panoply of gods worshiped at the instruction of priest cults in every land and village in the world.

Then, there were those restraining laws of: "Thou Shalt Not Murder, Steal, Covet thy neighbor's wife" ...no human sacrifice -- a BIG LAW -- which were merely brought to the attention of men. The Jews did not require that others must follow what the Jews took upon themselves seemed to inspire a rage that lasts to this day.

But, as a Light Unto the Nations, this they accomplished but, with bitter results for the messenger. Man mostly did give up worshiping idols -- although subsequent religions managed to work around this but, they did accept the idea of One G-d. Still envy, jealously and rage followed the messenger.

But, the new institutions of religion who adopted the One G-d could not rage against G-d, so they used other methods. Demonizing the Jew was favored so as to diminish what the Jews represented as G-d Chosen Messenger.

Alternate representatives were evolved; books and scrolls were written in ponderous quantities, castigating Jews. Any achievements which the Jews brought to mankind were ascribed to the partnership which Jews had with devils and demons -- many of whom were once worshiped by the Gentiles along with pagan idols. All of this was shifted over onto the back fo the Jews. The new religions borrowed what was necessary from Torah Law and modified it so it was unequally theirs.

Here again, the Jews had no complaints because that was exactly what their role was to be "A Light Unto the Nations".

But, the Gentiles in their evolution to what would have been a higher level, they abandoned the privilege of what they wanted most. You cannot murder and expect rewards of a privileged after-life. They choose to murder G-d's messenger so they might go first on that very narrow bridge to a Heaven which they will never reach. To be sure there are those who didn't engage in either killing the messenger or assisting others to do so. There are those called "righteous" Gentiles who acted to assist and shelter the Jews who they, no doubt, will ascend to Heaven.

Regrettably, the rage continues and great efforts are being made to this day to murder the Jews of the Covenant. It is said by the Prophets that G-d will forgive the evils of men but, will not forgive the spilling of Jewish blood. It is a choice or perhaps a test man must make but at great risk or reward. Is it by this test which we Jews gain and deserve our sovereignty over the Land which G-d promised our ancients, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Joseph and Moses as well as their seed forever.

This is our sovereignty and our right to the Land. No one deserves to take it from us.

###

1. "Key to Peace in Palestine" by Judea Pearl (father of slain Wall St. Journal journalist Daniel Pearl) on "Naseeb Vibes -- the Largest Muslim E-Zine" Mar.7, 2005

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

WHAT MAKES CONDOLEEZZA RUN?
Posted by Ruth Matar, January 25, 2007.

Dear Friends,

In my Letter from Jerusalem of January 11, 2007, entitled "The State Department Vs. The Jews And Israel", I included the list of U.S. Secretaries of State since the rebirth of the State of Israel.

This article evoked much interest, especially from Americans, both Jews and Christians. Thank you, dear friends! Your taking time out to reply to my article is reassuring. You do care greatly about what happens here in Israel!

Some of you listed the Secretaries of State who you do not admire - guess who was at the top of this list? Condoleezza Rice! That may be because she so openly shows her animosity to Israel and the Jews!

She lists as her best friends and mentors two former U.S. Secretaries of State, James Baker and Colin Powell. One of these verbalizes crude intentions toward the Jews -- four letter words and all -- and the other one can't tell the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter!

But let us proceed to the present situation.

During her recent visit to Israel, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice worked hard to promote Mahmoud Abbas as the poster-boy of moderation.

Standing next to Abbas at a press conference on January 14, she practically gushed with enthusiasm when she said in her opening remarks, "I want everyone to know, particularly the Palestinian people, how much we admire the leadership of President Abbas as a leader of the Palestinian people."

But only three days before that, at the January 14 press conference, Abbas publicly called upon Palestinians to attack Israel! Speaking at a rally to mark the 42nd anniversary of the founding of Fatah, Abbas told a huge crowd in Ramallah, "With the will and determination of its sons, Fatah will continue. We will not give up our principles. We have said that rifles should be directed against the occupation. We have a legitimate right to direct our guns against Israeli occupation."

This week I received a letter from a dear Christian Zionist friend of mine, Dr. Jim Vineyard, who heads the Yedidim (Friends) of Israel organization in the United States.

He wrote me that Condoleezza Rice stated, after returning home from her meetings with Abbas, that the U.S. is working with Abbas' Fatah to create a unified Palestinian security force. Rice then announced a United States 86.4 million dollar grant, which will be for the purpose of equipping and training Abbas' Fatah forces!

Mahmoud Dahlan is the Gaza warlord who will be responsible for carrying out this plan. Dahlan's curriculum vitae includes the school bus bombing where two adults were killed, and the three Cohen children were crippled for life, as their limbs had to be amputated.

According to Dr. Vineyard, Dahlan is going to include leaders of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror organization from Nablus and Jenin and Ramallah.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, along with Islamic Jihad -- both -- have taken responsibility for "every suicide bombing" in Israel in the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis.

The following is Mahmoud Dahlan's exact quote of just a few days ago. Dahlan said:

"THE PROJECT THIS TIME IS SUPPOSED TO BE ARMING FATAH AGAINST HAMAS, BUT [ALLAH] FORBID, I WILL NEVER SHOOT AGAINST MY BOTHERS IN HAMAS.

THE [USA] WEAPONS AND AID WILL PROTECT THE INSTITUTIONS OF FATAH AND BE USED TO FIGHT ISRAELI OCCUPATION!"

The "brilliant" diplomatic efforts of U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have landed the United States in an untenable situation. America will be bank-rolling a terrorist and a murderer of innocent people, and the financier of the Munich massacre, where 11 athletes were murdered, including an American, David Berger. He is also a holocaust denier, just like his buddy Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran.

The Arabs are brazenly telling us what they plan to do with the American windfall!

Are you hard of hearing Condoleezza? Don't you understand how Abbas means to use the American money? Does it not disturb you just a wee bit that your "diplomatic" efforts will cause the death of many innocent people?

Dear friends, there you have it in a nutshell. Abbas will not use the generous American grant of 86.4 million dollars to fight Hamas, but for a wholesale killing of the infidel Jews and Christians. You do know, don't you, that the majority of Christians have fled from Bethlehem because they are afraid of the Moslems?

What can you do? Bombard President Bush, your senators and your congressmen with faxes and letters and phone calls with this simple message or a variation thereof:

"I don't want my taxpayers money to end up in the pockets of terrorists and murderers. Don't fund their jihad against all of us non-Moslems!"

Please distribute this Letter from Jerusalem as widely as possible.

Below is an article I wrote a year ago about Condoleezza Rice, entitled "A Ship On Oily Waters." This article might help to explain who Condoleezza is and who she is representing! Is she still representing the oil industry which named a double-hulled 129,000 ton giant tanker "Condoleezza Rice" in her honor?

A Ship On Oily Waters"
February 10, 2005

Dear Friends,

I must confess that I have heretofore been an admirer of the new US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. She seemed to me to be a perfect role model for women, someone who grew up in very difficult circumstances, but pulled herself up by her bootstraps, and reached the very heights of personal achievement. President George W. Bush nominated her to succeed Colin Powell as US Secretary of State in November of 2004, and the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85 -- 13.

Condoleezza Rice was born on November 14, 1954, in Birmingham, Alabama, the only child of Angelena Rice and the Reverend John Wesley Rice, Jr., a minister at Westminster Presbyterian Church.

Birmingham, Alabama, where Condoleezza grew up, is the town where Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King was thrown in jail for demonstrating without a permit. Where black people had to ride at the back of the bus. Where black people weren't even allowed to drink water from public fountains. Where a classmate of Condoleezza, Denise McNair, was among the four girls killed in the 1963 bombing of an African-American Baptist church by white supremacists. But Condoleezza states that growing up during segregation taught her determination against adversity.

I was very pleased, along with many others, that Colin Powell was not going to be the US Secretary of State during the second term of President George W. Bush, as Israeli analysts had predicted that Condoleezza Rice was going to be friendlier to Israel than her predecessor. I became somewhat concerned when I learned that at her Senate confirmation hearing Rice said: "And, if I am confirmed, I will be especially honored to succeed a man I so admire -- my friend and mentor, Colin Powell. He was a great and inspirational Secretary of State."

That was the first alarm bell. Colin Powell was the US Secretary of State, who described Arafat to a US Senate Committee as follows: "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

I became really concerned about Ms. Rice's attitude toward Israel when I read the newspaper headlines during her recent whirlwind tour of Europe and the Middle East. For instance, the headline in The Jerusalem Post of February 7, 2005 read as follows on the front page: RICE CALLS ON ISRAEL TO HELP, NOT HINDER, ABBAS.

In private meetings and public declarations, visiting US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Israel to do everything possible to support Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, and to refrain from taking steps that would make it more difficult for him to assert his authority... According to diplomatic officials, Rice said that Abbas needed to have tangible results to take to his people....

What exactly does that mean? Should the victim supply the hangman with the rope? Should Israel be on Abbas' side in the negotiations? Does Ms. Rice not want a mutual give and take? Condoleezza also made it clear that the US government was against settlements. Whose settlements? (According to Joseph Farah, Arab-American head of World Net Daily, more Arab than Jewish settlements have been established in the Holy Land since 1948. As a matter of fact, almost twice as many Arab settlements than Jewish settlements have been built since the Jewish State was reborn!) Also, Condoleezza insists that the Disengagement Plan go forward as promised by Sharon. Altogether, Rice made it clear that she wanted Israel to take steps to bolster Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen).

It seems that Rice was not concerned about bolstering Sharon, who had just encountered a massive non-violent demonstration of at least 200,000 people who strongly disagreed with his policies vis a vis the PLO enemy, and his intentions to reward such terrorists with Biblical covenant land.

Condoleezza Rice, in an interview with Yediot Aharonot, said: "I am the daughter of a Presbyterian minister and was brought up on the very moving stories of the Holy Land. They mean a lot to me. When I first visited Mt. Olives, Lake Kinneret, Jerusalem, I felt a very deep emotional experience. I already then felt that I am returning home despite the fact that this was a place that I never visited. I have a deep affinity with Israel."

Sadly to say, the daughter of a Minister of God is hell-bent on promoting the expulsion of 8,000 Jews from their Biblical homeland. During her childhood, Condoleezza must have read the Judeo-Christian Bible. No doubt she must have come across the fact in the Book of Joshua that G-d gave Gaza to the Tribe of Judah. Also, that it is stated in the Book of the prophet Amos, Chapter 9: 14-15, "I will return the captivity of my people Israel, and they will rebuild desolate cities and settle them; they will plant vineyards and drink their wine; they will cultivate gardens and eat their fruits. I will plant them upon their land and they will never again be uprooted from their land that I have given them, said HASHEM your G-d."

I decided to do some research through the Internet to find out more about Condoleezza Rice. If you, dear friend, have some extra time, you will be able to find out interesting facts about Condoleezza Rice, her attitude to the Holy Land, and her past associations, which are far from reassuring for friends of Israel. For instance, James Baker of "F__k the Jews" fame, is one of her good friends. They have many common interests and attitudes.

As Condoleezza Rice embarked on her maiden voyage after her appointment as US Secretary of State, it was reported that she departed from America armed with a new policy paper on how to implement the Quartet's Road Map produced by the James Baker Institute For Public Policy At Rice University.

According to Edward Djerejian, the former US Ambassador to Syria who directs the Baker Center, the policy paper, with its detailed recommendations, is a "street map to the Road Map."

The following is part of an article by Caroline Glick, Jerusalem Post columnist:

"... the team that composed the report included senior policy makers from the US, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Canada and the World Bank. The US was represented by current Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs William Burns as well as by Norman Olsen, the political counselor at the US embassy in Israel. The PA was represented by security strongman Jibril Rajoub and by senior aides to Mahmoud Abbas, Yasser Arafat and Ahmed Qurei. Egypt was represented by Dictator Hosni Mubarak's senior adviser Osama El Baz and by General Hossam Khair Allah.

Israel had no official representation. Rather, the Jewish state was represented by none other than Yossi Beilin's Geneva Accord crowd. Amnon Lipkin Shahak and Shlomo Brom, signatories to that subversive agreement where private citizens tried to abscond with the government's sovereign power to determine foreign policy by negotiating the scandalously anti-Israel "accord," participated. They were joined by members of Beilin's EU-financed think tank, the Economic Cooperation Foundation.

Not surprisingly, the product this team produced and delivered to Rice is soft on Palestinian terrorism, soft on Palestinian democratization, and relentlessly harsh toward Israel -- its sovereignty, its right to defend itself, and its ability to claim any right to retain any of the Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria.

The document makes no clear statement on the need for the Palestinians to dismantle terrorist organizations. Indeed, the term "terror organizations" is absent from the report. Instead, the Palestinian requirement to combat terrorism is reduced to demands on Israel to facilitate the training, arming and operation of the "reformed" Palestinian security services while not interfering with them in any way....

But two questions still arise: Why is the US government sending its officials to participate in a 'working group' which works to undermine the sovereignty of a US ally; and why is the Israeli government not taking legal action against private citizens who travel the world "negotiating" away the sovereign rights of the state while undermining the prerogatives of the Israeli government?"

I have only chosen two items from her background which I feel cast light on the persona of Condoleezza Rice.

1) Chevron is a San Francisco-based multinational oil firm, one of the top ten largest oil companies in the world. Condoleezza Rice served on Chevron's board from 1991 until January 15, 2001, when she resigned after Bush named her as his top national security aide. A double-hulled 129,000-ton giant tanker, part of the international fleet of Chevron, had years before been named "Condoleezza Rice" in honor of her service to the Chevron oil company.

Critics complained that the ship served as a giant floating symbol of the Bush administration's cozy ties to the oil industry. The tanker's name also raised more serious questions of possible conflict of interest for Rice, because Chevron does business on six continents and in 25 countries, and has been sued for alleged human-rights abuses in Nigeria.

Leaving a wave of controversy in its wake, one of the most visible reminders of the Bush administration's ties to big oil -- the "Condoleezza Rice" tanker -- was quietly renamed the "Altair Voyager."

2) There has been widespread concern that Rice's expertise is the Soviet Union and that she is out of her depths in the Middle East. Actually, she was out of her depths in relation to the Soviet Union as well. Rice, who claims an expertise in nothing less than the high-stakes world of global power, has failed spectacularly as the "expert" who was disastrously wrong in her area of expertise -- the US relationship with Mikhail Gorbachev. President George H. W. Bush, Rice, National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft, James Baker (then Secretary of State) and then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Colin Powell approved supporting the Soviet leader and his vision of a reformed Soviet Union. Dick Cheney (then Secretary of Defense), Paul Wolfowitz (his deputy), and Lewis "Scooter" Libbey foresaw the break-up of the USSR and wanted to speed it along. "Regime change" in Europe and Asia was what the Cheney crew were after -- with resulting opportunities for American corporate interests if the US got in on the action early.

As it turned out, Bush and Rice prevailed. In one famous incident, Rice physically blocked the door to the Oval Office to prevent Russian leader Boris Yeltsin from meeting with the President. The Bush team was slow to grasp the scope of the changes that were seizing Europe, slow to encourage the unification of Germany, and slow to give up on the Soviet Union. A speech Bush gave with Rice's assistance in Kiev became notorious as the "Chicken Kiev" speech because in it, the US urged the people of the Ukraine, (then clamoring for independence), to remain loyal to Moscow. At the same time, the President balked at giving Gorbachev what he needed -- either at arms talks, or in terms of foreign aid -- and the Soviet leader's domestic currency made a nose-dive. Within months, the Gorbachev era was over. The new post-Soviet Republics broke away one by one and in Russia, Yeltsin rose to power.

The above information gleaned from the Internet certainly made me less starry-eyed about Condoleezza Rice.

Of prime importance to us in Israel is Condoleezza Rice's apparent antagonism to the Jewish People, and their right to live in their entire homeland, as spelled out continuously in the Bible. We must also be aware of her continual attempts to whitewash Mahmoud Abas (Abu Mazen) and his unsavory past.

The next holocaust train has already left the station and is once again hurtling towards the abyss. What will change the US policy favoring the forced deportation of Jews from Gaza and Samaria?

Dear friends, I feel that only a very strong showing of support for Israel by Jewish and Christian Bible believers, and other concerned supporters of Israel, will be able to stop this train.

Ruth and Nadia Matar established Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green), an activist group of women based in Jerusalem. Their website address is http://www.womeningreen.org

To Go To Top

THE RISE AND (ALLEGED) FALL OF FRENCH ANTI-SEMITISM
Posted by Edward I. Koch and Rafael Medoff, January 25, 2007.

Edward I. Koch, a member of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, served as mayor of New York City from 1978 to 1989. Dr. Rafael Medoff is director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies. They are coauthors of the forthcoming book,  Confronting Antisemitism
and the Holocaust.

This article is archived at
http://article.nationalreview.com/ ?q=NmE0YWNmOTVhODQ2Y2FiOTg4OWUyNDg4YjQ3ZDExOGM=

Things have improved in France, but not so much as the ambassador to the U.S. would claim.

The French ambassador to the United States, His Excellency Jean-David Levitte, had good news for the congregants at the Bronx synagogue he addressed last October: there had been a "48 percent decrease in reported anti-Semitic incidents [in France] over the past year." As for the anti-Semitism back in 2001-2002, "Yes, we had a problem," he acknowledged, "but it has abated. It's not over, but the trend is encouraging."

In view of the recurring eruptions of anti-Jewish violence in France in recent years, including, most notoriously, the torture-murder of a young Jewish man named Ilan Halimi by an anti-Semitic Muslim gang in February 2006, Monsieur Levitte's announcement was good news indeed.

But how accurate was it?

We decided to write to the ambassador to ask if he would identify the sources for the figures he cited and comment on reports of recent anti-Semitic incidents in his country.

A month passed with no reply. So we wrote a second time, reiterating our original question and pointing out that there had been a number of disturbingly relevant episodes in the previous four weeks:

arsonists attacked and damaged Merkaz HaTorah, a Jewish school in the Paris suburb of Gagny (Nov. 8);

the European Jewish Congress released a report which found that during July and August of 2006, there were 61 anti-Semitic incidents, "an increase of 79 percent over the same period last year." (Nov. 12);

a mob of French soccer fans shouting "Filthy Jew!" assaulted an Israeli man in a Paris restaurant, compelling the police to use lethal force to stop the attack (Nov. 23);

and speakers at a conference held in November by CRIF, the umbrella group of French Jewish organizations, reported that "in many suburbs of Paris, few Jewish young people still attend public school because of violence or threats of violence, mainly from African and North African Arab students. Jewish parents have placed their children in private Jewish schools, many of which were established in the past few years."

We asked the ambassador if that European Jewish Congress figure of 79 percent "is, to the best of your knowledge, correct; and if so, how does this square with your own reported statement of a recent decrease in anti-Semitic incidents?"

At long last, on December 5, 2006, Ambassador Levitte replied to our two letters. Since an ambassador's job is to put his country's best face forward, it is no surprise that he layered the letter with helpful quotations -- a statement by French President Jacques Chirac condemning anti-Semitism, a statement by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert praising Chirac's stance, and a poll showing that most Frenchmen think favorably of Jews. All impressive enough, but not really to the point.

As for the substantive issue, Amb. Levitte wrote: "I confirm what I said in my remarks at Young Israel of Pelham Parkway on October 22." He then quoted statistics that indeed show a 47-percent decrease (not identical, but close enough to the 48 percent cited in the Bronx). The problem, however, was that this number was for a time period earlier than the one about which we inquired.

The dates are critical. It was in late January 2006 that Ilan Halimi was kidnapped by an anti-Semitic Muslim gang and, after being tortured for three weeks in an apartment in a Paris suburb, was murdered. There was substantial evidence that anti-Semitism was a major motive of the perpetrators, and legitimate questions were raised by the Jewish community about what the neighbors may have known about what was happening in the apartment where Halimi was imprisoned for so long. Yet government and police spokesmen at first vehemently denied the attack was anti-Semitic, and none of the neighbors was ever prosecuted.

Thus the year following the Halimi murder can be seen as something of a litmus test: has the government, in response to the murder, taken sufficiently forceful measures to combat anti-Semitism, as it claims to have done?

That is exactly where Ambassador Levitte's letter becomes problematic. When he quoted the figures for the time period that we were asking about -- October 2005 through October 2006 -- his numbers were drastically different from the ones that he had been quoted as citing in his Bronx speech.

"By the end of October 2006," he wrote in his letter to us, "436 anti-Semitic incidents had been reported (compared with 450 for the same period in 2005)." That figure of 436 represents a decrease of only 3 percent. While any decrease is welcome, of course, a 3 percent decrease is a far cry from the 48 percent decrease he had claimed.

So we wrote again.

As politely as we could, we pointed out the contradiction between, on the one hand, the ambassador's statement that there had been a 48 percent decrease and (and his subsequent statement "confirming" it), and, on the other hand, his assertion of a 3 percent decrease. Which is the right number, Monsieur Levitte?

Two and a half weeks later, his reply arrived. This one was much briefer than the first because, he wrote, he did "not wish to go into a point-by-point discussion" of the issues at stake. Instead, he chose to briefly reiterate that "substantial progress" has been made in France in the fight against anti-Semitism "over the last few years." He said that these gains, "which were spectacular in 2005, look like being [sic] confirmed in 2006."

It doesn't look that way to us. It looks like, according to the government's statistics, anti-Semitic incidents decreased by 48 percent in 2005 but by just 3 percent in 2006. And, given the government's p.r. needs, those figures may well be the most optimistic possible.

"Even so," Ambassador Levitte concluded, "the French government is not satisfied with the present situation and remains fully determined to keep up a tireless fight against anti-Semitism."

Decisions on allocating time and resources to fighting anti-Semitism, like other governmental budgetary decisions, are made on the basis of the government's perception of the problem. If French officials really believe that anti-Semitism has already dropped by 48 percent in the past year, will their government commit the resources necessary to effectively fight it? We wouldn't take it for granted.

The Unity Coalition for Israel (http://www.israelunitycoalition.org) is "the largest worldwide coalition of Jewish and Christian organizations, with more than 200 groups representing millions of people dedicated to Israel. Though we have many different backgrounds, we have one common goal: A Safe and Secure Israel."

"Israel is not just a Jewish issue. Millions of Christians resolutely endorse the principle of peace with security for the state of Israel. Because we work closely together and speak with a united voice, our message is being heard!"

To Go To Top

HOW AMERICAN JEWS CAN GIVE TRUE CHARITY; ISRAEL'S EXPEDITED EXPULSION PLAN
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 25, 2007.

A Light Unto the World: Moshe Samucha and Carmel Elazar, representatives of the Persian Jewish community in New York, visited 12 mini-markets in the Qassam stricken town of Sderot, asking the store owners for their list of those in debt. Using the pool of money, the two then paid off the debts in cash. They reported that in total they paid USD 28,000 to all 12 stores. "Sderot's residents are good Jews that got into trouble because of the Qassams," said Elazar, "eliminating their debts is the least we could do for them." Jews for a Jewish Israel Yahoo Group

[Editor's Note: Contrast this with UJF John Ruskay saying in December 2006 he'd be in Israel in February and would meet with some of the leaders of the [Gush Katif] expellees for a few hours. Click here.]


Israel's expedited expulsion plan

Jews for a Jewish Israel
To subscribe jewsforajewishisrael-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Jews for a Jewish Israel correspondents covering the "Israel Illogical concessions" uncovered a vicious underhanded plot by Mr. Olmert and his cabinet to establish a temporary PLO state and unilaterally surrender lands in Judea and Samaria, calling for the expulsion of more than one hundred thousand Jewish Israeli citizens. Jews for a Jewish Israel is further reporting that the team includes high-ranking officials in the Foreign and Defense Ministries, and high-ranking representatives of the Israeli army and Israeli intelligence also involved in the process.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and the director-general of her ministry, Aharon Abramowitz, appointed a high-ranking official who will coordinate the effort -- diplomat Yossi Amrani, the former Israeli consul in San Francisco.

The choice of Amrani could not have been coincidental.

In November, 2003, this reporter revealed that Amrani, despite his official position as the Israeli consul, organized fund raising events for Israeli opposition leader Yossi Beilin, who then led the Geneva Initiative on December 1st, 2003, which called for the unilateral establishment of a Palestinian entity within temporary borders, under the unchallenged rule of the PLO.

Now Amrani has been given the task of formulating, within several weeks, an official working paper of the Israeli government which will give a detailed outline of Israel's immediate surrender of land to the PLO Among other things, Amrani will deal with the question of how Israel should sell the plan to AIPAC and to the US administration.

During the Summer 2006 Lebanon War, Prime Minister Olmert was quoted as saying that the war would contribute to his plans for carrying out a withdrawal plan. The statement, which was denied by the Prime Minister's Bureau, aroused a great deal of criticism, mainly because thousands of religious soldiers, many of them inhabitants of the settlements, were risking their lives on the front at that very time.

Olmert therefore had to clarify that the option of unilateral withdrawal was frozen, and even said that it had never been adopted as Israel's official policy. He said that the only policy in effect was that of negotiations with Abu Mazen and the continued boycott of the Hamas government. Olmert is consistent in this position, and has reiterated it several times since the cease-fire in mid-August.

Ironically, a previous commission was established by Israeli Foreign Minister Livni to evaluate the idea of a unilateral withdrawal from most of Judea and Samaria. That commission's report, leaked to the Haaretz newspaper on August 15th, 2006, concluded that, " Israel has no security solution to the threat of rockets launched from the West Bank against population centers." The report's authors assumed that following any unilateral Israeli pullout from any part of Judea and Samaria, Hamas will takeover and deploy rockets against Israel's population centers on Israel's coastal plain.

The report emphasized that the only solution to the missile threat that the Israel Defense Forces has to offer is its actual presence in the territories and control of the high ground of Judea and Samaria, also known as the "West Bank."

Another conclusion of the report commissioned by the Israeli Foreign Minister is that Israel will not gain international recognition for an end to the occupation if it continues to hold significant portions of Judea and Samaria. Foreign Ministry Director General Aharon Abramovitch, headed that commission.

An Israeli Member of the Knesset has asked for a copy of the previous Israeli foreign ministry report which warned against any unilateral surrender of territory to the PLO. The spokesman of the Israel Foreign Ministry has informed MK Alon's aide that this was an "internal report" that it would not be released.

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

US BOYCOTTS ISRAEL ARMY; ISRAEL DOESN'T TELL WORLD ABOUT ROCKET BOMBARDMENT; OLMERT'S NEXT CAVE-IN; US APPEASEMENT
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 24, 2007.

UNO TOO LATE ON IRAN

The Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies in Israel concludes that Iran's nuclear development has gone too far to be stopped by economic sanctions. The Security Council was to vote for such sanctions, as amended (diluted) by Russia.

The Center suggests military attack, which Israel could mount sufficiently to delay Iran's program. (And what then, attack again, to defer it again?)

The Center's military reports are greatly respected (IMRA, 12/22).

Not by me. The Center usually is appeasement-minded. I happen to agree with this assessment, however.

What good is the UNO, coming with diluted sanctions, after Iran has developed diabolic know-how? Do you suppose that Iran's allies on the Security Council will respect sanctions? The problem with the UNO is that it is divided by forces of evil. It dithers with diplomacy. The purpose of that diplomacy is to paralyze action against Iran. It worked. Diplomacy is favored by many in our own country, one of the prime targets of Iran. Our naifs are manipulated by the wicked.

Those who recommended diplomacy should have set a deadline beyond which force would be used. They don't want to use force. They are insincere. They failed to ask, what effect can diplomacy have on Iran? How could diplomacy have an effect, when Iran's allies on the Security Council defend it and dilute economic sanctions? What could diplomats say to the leaders of Iran, who believe themselves destined to prevail in a divinely ordered struggle regardless of casualties? We have nothing to offer them while preserving our freedom, for their goal is to deprive us of our freedom.

It is like dealing with a blackmailer totally without scruples. You pay his price; he pockets it. He still has a hold over you. He demands another price. The only way to deal with him is to fight him.

ANTI-ISRAEL CAMPAIGN AT TEL AVIV U.

A far leftist and Arab group have stacked a seminar to discuss the status of Arab terrorist prisoners. The seminar will conclude that, although some of the prisoners have committed murder, and others attempted or supported such efforts, they are political prisoners. The speakers will recommend freeing the prisoners, and may even suggest that such a release be good for Israeli security (Prof. Steven Plaut, 12/22).

There is no end to the proposals by far leftists that would get more of their own people killed. It is too foolish merely to be foolish. I think it is pathological.

In Israel and in the US, the Far Left influences the Left, which influences the government. Therefore, the Left is a danger to self-preservation. I think it is influential beyond its numbers, and that the Right nowadays poses not much danger except to the environment. Liberals who worry about the religious Right should worry about the menace posed by the Left.

U.S. BOYCOTTING ISRAEL ARMY

Since September, the US has withheld arms supposed to be shipped to Israel. It has acted informally and without announcement (IMRA, 12/23).

Where are those who hate Bush, now that they are needed? Ironic, isn't it, that while the antisemites are claiming that AIPAC runs US foreign policy, the US chokes off arms for Israel, not for the first time. This demonstrates that Israel needs its own arms industry and cannot depend on the US. It also shows that the US mistreats allies. This mistreatment harms American national security.

If Israel had moved large land forces immediately into Lebanon, and had defeated Hizbullah thoroughly before the UNO ceasefire, and had punished Syria for supplying Hizbullah, the US might have retained some respect for its ally. PM Olmert's stupidity and appeasement-mindedness is partly responsible, as is the appeasement-mindedness of many Americans, including liberals and Baker-ites.

SYRIA BUILDS VILLAGES TO TRAP ISRAELI FORCES

Syria is building fortified villages along the Israeli border, in order to trap Israeli forces in war. Some of the villages are not inhabited yet, but they are constructed like the ones Hizbullah prepared in Lebanon, for making Israeli troops abandon vulnerable tanks and fight man-to-man, forfeiting the advantage of a conventional army, in an urban setting.

The IDF supposes it would take another war for Syria to make peace (IMRA, 12/22).

The IDF supposes wrong. Peace cannot be made with Muslims, only truces can. Until they reform their religion, they believe in continuing the struggle to dominate others.

Syria's strategy exploits Israel's humanitarian policy and fear of biased criticism for not being humanitarian. Israel can counteract the strategy by publicly reverting to WWII tactics. That is, when at war, Israel would demolish by long-range artillery such fortified villages. Israel need not respect an Arab strategy based on war crime.

PM OLMERT TO LET PLO BRIGADE INTO TERRITORIES

They are Abbas' men (IMRA, 12/23).

The US tells Israel to let the brigade in, to bolster Abbas against Hamas. Olmert thinks this is better for Israel. It doesn't occur to Olmert that Islamist terrorists work against Israel more than against each other. The answer is to liquidate them all.

ISRAEL DOESN'T TELL WORLD ABOUT ROCKET BOMBARDMENT

From Israel's Foreign Ministry: "Even though most of these rockets have fortunately not caused serious harm to the civilians they were aimed at, no country in the world would tolerate any such attacks on its civilian population." But Israel does, though it threatens not to. Israel's relative silence risks censure for "over-reaction" when it finally strikes back. It waits like a sitting duck for the Arabs to uphold the ceasefire (IMRA, 12/24).

OLMERT'S NEXT CAVE-IN

After months of declaring that he would release Arab prisoners only in exchange for their releasing their one Israeli captive, who would come home, first, now PM Olmert says he may release some terrorists unilaterally, to "strengthen" Abbas.

The head of Israel's Shin Bet had warned that if Hamas keeps getting paid by Iran and its men trained in advanced warfare, Hamas would dominate the P.A. and present a more formidable challenge to Israel militarily (IMRA, 12/24).

I've disputed the desirability of strengthening the Abbas terrorist faction. What kind of a person is he to support, if his strength comes from rescuing murderers of Israelis? The burden is on those who propose measures that weaken Israeli security to show that this would strengthen him. They don't show it, they just assert it, but Muslims believe that everything is coming to them and that Jews are evil and must be destroyed. Any Jewish concession they suppose due to Muslim strength. They don't appreciate it. Nor is there any evidence that the previous concessions to Abbas strengthened him. His strength steadily dwindled. He is a lost cause. Thank goodness! His combination of diplomacy & warfare made him more dangerous than Hamas and a US rallying cry for concessions.

Olmert is another lost cause. He makes all sorts of strong statements, but then gives in. It is typical of Israeli leadership from Rabin on down, and I mean down.

By now it is clear to the Arabs that Israeli leaders do not mean their threats to the Arabs or assurances to their people. The Arabs and the US keep pressing Israel for concessions. Israel says "No more!," but then offers more.

Israel should not let the two factions build up military capabilities, in the hope that Israeli restraint in the face of their rocket bombardment avoids all-out war and that perhaps the two factions will kill themselves off. Better to invade in force and wipe both factions out. But that should be followed by a policy of recouping unsettled areas of Gaza and Judea-Samaria, with explanations about Israel's right to do so. Israel, like the US, needs a policy for attaining victory. The West should not leave the initiative to the enemy.

DIPLOMATS TALK NONSENSE

Israeli diplomats consider the Security Council sanctions against Iran a first step against Iran's nuclear weapons development. Assuming that Iran does not accept the UNO prohibition and the sanctions do not have great effect, the diplomats say that the "international community" must demand further and stronger action (IMRA, 12/24).

What "international community?" Half the world supports Iran or won't oppose it. What first step? The sanctions are the last step. The Israeli diplomats ought to see that this was the best China and Russia would allow the Security Council to do, after all these years. They came up with a mere nuisance for Iran, too late to stop the weapons development and too minor to impress Iran. To the contrary, this weak compromise demonstrates to Iran that the world really doesn't care enough to do much.

SOME ROADBLOCKS COMING DOWN

In yet another attempt to please the US and be humanitarian to the diabolic Muslim Arab enemy, PM Olmert said he would have some roadblocks dismantled in Judea-Samaria. Meanwhile, Arabs there fired upon an Israeli car, wounding the driver. This state of war is no time to reduce roadblocks that intercept or deter many terrorists (IMRA, 12/24).

What does Olmert do to protect his people?

The governments of Israel probably have gone through a hundred cycles of: (1) Terrorism; (2) Set up roadblocks and reduce terrorism; (3) Take down roadblocks out of misguided humaneness and criminally negligent US pressure; and (4) Renewed terrorism. When will Israelis stop Prime Ministers from taking down roadblocks?

REASON FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS TO P.A.

"Humanitarian" relief for mismanagement by Hamas (IMRA, 12/24).

This relief covers up for Hamas' mismanagement, or diversion of public funds for war. Hamas must welcome it. Without it, the people might grow hostile to Hamas. Not that the people have a better alternative or want a better alternative.

OBAMA AGENDA

Sen. Obama released his policy agenda. It included: (1) Criticism of the liberal priority for working more closely with allies, I think because that is not a policy but a method; (2) Try harder to make peace between the P.A. and Israel. Sen. Obama usually has been supportive of Israel; (3) Start direct discussions with Iran and N. Korea (Josh Gerstein, NY Sun, 12/26, p.1).

The Senator who would be President doesn't know that the conflict is not between Palestinian Arabs and Israel, but between Islam and Israel. He doesn't know it is a religious conflict that cannot be reconciled, until the aggressor religion, Islam, stops being exclusive. The US can no more reconcile the two sides than it could reconcile with al-Qaeda. He hasn't caught on that although the US can force Israel to make concessions to the Arabs, concessions have a counter-productive effect on the Arabs, thoroughly imbued with hatred, to deem them weakness inviting attack. Nor does he understand that the State Dept. doesn't seek peace but is anti-Zionist, for non-Islamic reasons. He may mean well but doesn't support Israel that way.

Where was Sen. Obama during the years of US discussions with rogue states, during which they stalled while continuing illegally to pursue nuclear arms development? In answer to his Democrt critics, Pres. Bush brought other allies, Russia, China, and the UNO into negotiations. Now N. Korea has nuclear arms and Iran is about to. Obama is too reliant upon negotiations. What can one say in negotiations that a totalitarian, fanatical foe, convinced it can win the world jihad, and gaining ground in it, would heed? Senator, there is a time to talk and a time to fight. The fighting has begun. You still want to talk? I want to fight back hard. While we can.

TYPICAL CABINET MEETING

PM Olmert relayed to his Cabinet Ministers a request from Abbas (contrary to Olmert's pledges to await P.A. return of its Israeli prisoner) to release Arab terrorist prisoners unilaterally, for a Muslim holiday.

Vice-Premier Peres said it would strengthen ties with moderate elements in the P.A.. Defense Min. Peretz said the gesture should not be dependent upon the Israeli's release. Former Defense Min. Mofaz said that since Israel has done so, before, Israel has no reason not to do so, again (IMRA, 12/24).

Israel does have reasons not to do so, again. It is a course of action urged upon Israel by its enemies. Such concessions never confer much strength upon dissident elements. Besides, those elements are not moderate, but Israel's usual enemies. Israel thinks Hamas is worse, but Abbas' greater flexibility, his willingness to make promises in return for concessions, and his false symbolizing of moderation that beings prisoner releases for nothing make him more dangerous to Israel, even as his unwillingness or inability to fulfill his obligations to Israel makes him useless to Israel.

More reasons. Half the released prisoners return to terrorism. Releasing them encourages others. Releasing them dooms the Israeli, by removing a hold Israel has over the P.A.. Nor is it Israel's task to honor Muslim holidays.

To get the Israeli back or eliminate much of the terrorist menace, should Israel announce that unless he were released promptly, Israel would execute a hundred terrorists?

DON'T BLAME JUST BUSH FOR THE WAR'S PROBLEMS

When the US was attacked by Islamists, the Democrats had no strategy for it. When an attack occurred on 9/11, during the Bush Administration, Pres. Bush fought back in Afghanistan, but said the war was broader. He exerted leadership against Saddam, who seemed to be redeveloping nuclear power. For months, he prodded the UNO to act. Finally, he enforced UNO resolutions by arms. During that time, Democrats approved funds for the war. They did not propose or question strategy. Now that the war has continued longer than they anticipated, they condemn the President for it. They try to evade their own share of the problem.

WHAT'S IN A NAME?

Ancient Rome renamed defeated Judea after the Philistines, a non-Arab people who at first dominated the Hebrews but later assimilated into them. The change in name was a propaganda attempt to disassociate the country with the Judeans, or Jews. The English for the Roman name is Palestine. When the modern Zionists, originally known as "Palestinians," renamed the country after the other Jewish kingdom, Israel, local Arabs, some of whom started invading from about 700 C.E., and most of whom followed the Zionists in, called themselves "Palestinians," to falsely associate themselves with the country as if they were the original inhabitants.

Not knowing history, people suppose that the Jews usurped the country from the Arabs.

ARAB ARMS FOR SHOW, ONLY?

The Gulf States spend many billions of dollars on arms. When Saddam attacked Kuwait, however, the royal family fled to S. Arabia, without using its military for defense. The Saudis were so afraid of offending Saddam, that they didn't report the invasion.

Saddam also attacked S. Arabia (but more ominously moved forces up to the border). The Saudis did not move into defensive position their own forces, not their hundreds of planes and tanks. What are their armaments for?

Youssef Ibrahim suggests they are for: (1) Generating billions of dollars of commissions for the ruling families; (2) Supporting the arms supplying countries' arms industry, so that, the Arabs hope, the foreigners will defend them (NY Sun, 12/26, p.5).

Why don't the rulers just pay themselves and the foreigners more? Does the Saudi arms purchase from China mean that Chinese troops will come into the Mideast, too?

NEW U.S. SCHEME FLOATED

The US broached a scheme for declaring unilaterally a Palestinian Arab state in the Territories by the end of 2007, with temporary borders. Israel is considering it.

Israel (and the Road Map) has insisted for years that to make peace and resolve problems, the P.A. must renounce terrorism, dismantle the terrorist infrastructure (and stop inciting to violence).

An Israeli diplomat argued that P.A. chaos renders Israeli demands irrelevant, because no P.A. leader can meet the Israeli (and road map) conditions. "A source close to the P.A. said that such a plan could be acceptable only if America provides assurances that the temporary state does not become a final one and that the border issue remains on the table."

Since the Arabs won't stop terrorism, why give them a state anyway? Crazy! (IMRA, 12/24.) They would use the state for terrorism, as per their doctrine.

The ostensible reason for temporary borders is that negotiation would follow. The real reason, or at least the consequence, is to give the Arabs sovereignty for better fighting Israel and an excuse to keep the conflict open.

OTHER U.S. APPEASEMENT

Seeking Saudi cooperation in Iraq (which is in Saudi self-interest anyway), the US is blocking arms re-supply to Israel against the P.A. But it also curbs Israeli defense against the expected 2007 war by Hizbullah. The US also has lost faith in Israel's military ability (IMRA, 12/25).

In that case, Israel did lose the war in Lebanon.

Caroline Glick consistently analyzes Israel's policy on jihad keenly. Here is a summary of her piece on Israel's latest appeasement, with some comments of my own.

Foreign Min. Livni argues self-contradictorily that if the IDF responded to P.A. ceasefire violations, Hamas would fire upon Israel. Asked whether Hamas were strong enough to stop the rocket attacks, she answered that Hamas doesn't want to stop them.

For years, the Israeli government has had no long-range planning for defense from jihad. Instead, it reacted, if at all, from day-to-day, governed by ideology rather than study and regardless of what works. The chief outcome is concessions to the Muslim Arabs for nothing in return. Sometimes the government asserts an old rationale about making peace, though that same policy has not brought peace. At present, it explains that it is yielding to US pressure. It need not yield. It actually would gain respect by rejecting US demands as customarily harming Israel and as unable to bring peace with the hardened Islamists who have controlled the P.A. from Arafat's reign forward.

One of the latest, little-publicized concessions, is consent to let back into Gaza 13 terrorists exiled in exchange for ending their 39-day capture of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. In the year 2,000, dozens of PLO gunmen fleeing from the IDF burst into the Church, one of Christianity's holiest, and held an equal number of clergymen hostage. This followed general PLO bullying, beating, raping, extortion, and murder of Christians in what once was, and otherwise would have remained, a Christian city.

Some escaped monks described the terrorists' binge there. They looted whatever looked valuable. They ate and drank alcohol like swine, while starving the monks (and seeking sympathy from the outside world by complaining that Israel was denying them food, which it sent in). They beat the monks and used bibles for toilet paper. Israeli liberation from the PLO was a great relief for local Christians, not that foreign Christians noted. The native Christians must dread the return of those deported terrorists. (Israel treats Christians well, but betrays them. Israel should be condemned for betrayal. The Muslims should be condemned for hate-crimes.)

Israel offers concessions to Abbas to "strengthen him against Hamas," although since he is an enemy, strengthening him would not strengthen Israel. Olmert declares that Abbas is an enemy with whom one can do business. But Israel doesn't do business with him, it just gives him one-way concessions.

Supposedly, Abbas would use augmented forces and popularity to fight terrorism. Nonsense! His PLO exists to destroy Israel (and steal from its people). Besides, his people prefer the more genocidal Hamas. (The popularity that concessions supposedly but never bring him, is based on his people's hatred of Israel, which would hem in any peace-making he might be minded to make, minded to by what miracle is not explained).

If Abbas, the career terrorist, has become anti-terrorist, he would not: demand that Israel release terrorists, permit a brigade in from Jordan, pay funds for terrorist wages, and dismantle checkpoints that restrict terrorists. Neither would he allow arms in through Egypt (nor have his media preach Jew-hate and Jihad). Instead, he would encourage Israel to fight terrorism. His arms would be used to fight Israel. In what way is he not pro-terrorist? How little Israel does to fight Hamas, to help him! (IMRA, 12/25.)

NEW JEWISH TOWN "FUELS MIDEAST TENSIONS"

The Defense Minister approved conversion of a military post in the Jordan Valley, originally approved for civilian residency, back to community development. It is designed to accommodate some of the Israelis rendered homeless by their expulsion from Gaza. No sympathy in the Times for their plight. The decision was called a scandal because it was not voted on by Knesset. Reporter Steven Erlanger contrasted this first "settlement" in 10 years with PM Olmert's recent "series of gestures" to the P.A.. Indeed, Abbas' aide complained that it spoils the "atmosphere" of Olmert's concessions. The Arab claims that any land Israel has in Judea-Samaria is stolen from them.

The news was "complicated by" Muslim firing of more rockets into Israel and by Israel's violating the Road Map it pledged to follow. "The road map calls for a freeze settlement building in the first phase and a Palestinian push to dismantle terrorist groups; Israel says that the dismantling should come first and that no such action has taken place."

The same edition's editorial criticized the new decision as complicating the quest for peace. It praised his "gestures" but criticized his turning a fifth of withheld P.A. excise taxes over to the P.A., because the P.A. "legally" is entitled to five-fifths. In the long run, a secure Jewish state needs peace (New York Times,12/26).

Why does the Times call concessions that would finance terrorism, release terrorists, and facilitate their traveling on missions, mere "gestures?" I think it is because that traditionally anti-Zionist newspaper always wants more for the Arabs from Israel.

Yes, building a new Jewish town would cancel any goodwill that the concessions were thought to engender. But what goodwill have any Israeli concessions engendered? The Arabs still make war. Only fools make concessions to an enemy at war.

Should it be just for "atmosphere," that Israel makes such concessions? What does Abbas do for "atmosphere," with his praise of suicide bombers and his media that preach hate-crimes? Why doesn't the Times mention that and feature it until its readers understand what Israel and the US face in jihad?

It hardly is fitting for the Abbas regime to complain that Israel steals land, considering that this regime lost legislative control because of its widespread corruption, including theft of land. Israeli settlements are not thefts of land. The land is State land, the State in charge is Israel, and the Territories are unallocated lands under terms of the Mandate for a Jewish national home in its traditional homeland. Besides, the Arabs were not sovereign there. The Times rarely discusses history, it being favorable to Zionism, but leaves the misimpression that the area was an Arab country before the Mandate.

Note the Times' unfair juxtaposition of news. Israel is said to break its pledge for the Road Map, but the P.A. merely "complicates" matters by firing rockets. War, however, violates Oslo and Map. Nor is the Times fair in making Israel seem wrong now, when the P.A. has violated agreements for years, by promoting terrorism. Why should only Israel have to adhere to agreements already violated?

How ridiculous to claim the P.A. is "legally entitled" to money from Israel on which it wars! Nor is it a legitimate complaint that the Knesset didn't vote for the settlement. The Knesset had delegated such power to the Defense Minister, didn't the Times know?

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

MUSLIM PERCEPTIONS MUST BE CHANGED
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 24, 2007.

Make no mistake about this fact; Holocaust denial or trivialization is a direct attack on the rationale for the existence of Israel! Many nations, including America, have enacted or proposed laws asserting that Holocaust denial is a crime. Yet, many inhabitants of Muslim nations, the Machiavellian targets of this outrageous historical revision, consume the shameful concept ravenously, further fueling their hatred for Jews and Israel, further diverting their attention from exploitative autocratic rulers. Coupled with the false perception that Israeli Jews are abusive occupiers of hapless Palestinian waifs, fury against Israel and all Jews rages through fundamentalist as well as to a lesser degree more secular Muslim streets, ominously forecasting the obvious truth that a State of Israel will never be acceptable to many if not most Muslim inhabitants of today's dysfunctional Middle East, even if land for peace agreements are eventually extorted from Israel by savvy Arabs and their naive supporters. The entire State of Israel is a pariah, illegitimately squatting on Arab land, thus should not exist at all in the brainwashed collective mind's eye of so many Middle East Muslims.

How then can there ever be peaceful coexistence between tiny Israel and its vast surrounding Muslim neighborhood? Ceding land to Gaza Arabs, for one, only intensified the enmity between Arabs and Jews; witness the subsequent democratic election of Hamas, a group that openly refuses to recognize Israel, as well as a continuing barrage of deadly rocket fire into Israel by those less than grateful Arabs. The dominating collective mindset of today's Arabs interprets such a conciliatory gesture as weakness, encouraging predatory instincts to demand more and more in an attempt to someday fully sever the exposed jugular of its bleeding despised prey. Thus, the only hope for lasting peace between Jews and Muslims within this self destructive region of the planet, characterized by Machiavellian exploitation of naïve Islamic populations and a conveniently situated Jewish scapegoat, is a wholesale purging of that insidiously programmed mindset maintaining the status quo for filthy rich Muslim autocrats.

Reprogramming the collective Muslim mindset will require a strategic plan crafted by psychologists, sociologists familiar with Islamic culture, and communications experts. Funding likely will need to be funneled through clandestine channels in order to avoid preemptive counter measures. Exploited Muslim populations must be made to understand that the perceptually manipulated Israeli Palestinian conflict has absolutely nothing to do with the reality of their own daily lives. They must be made to see the manipulated conflict as a diversionary tool, used to maintain a status quo that benefits their autocratic rulers, whose foremost objective is to enhance personal wealth and power at the expense of ordinary Muslims. They must be made to see that violent acts against any defined infidel, especially homicide/suicide martyrdom, are perversions of their theology. They must be made to see their own leaders for what they are, violators of a sacred 'peaceful' interpretation of their Koran. All gospels indeed are subject to manipulative interpretations, much like historical events can be skewed to reflect the predilections of those currently in charge. This fact cannot be ignored.

Furthermore, any humiliation Middle Eastern Muslims now feel is a direct result of thought processes cleverly manipulated by their despotic leaders driven by personal agendas. Once the widely accepted false presumption of Palestinian occupation, a cudgel created by those Machiavellian Muslim autocrats to beat Israelis and indeed all Jews, is debunked, truthfully redefined and successfully disseminated by Israeli strategists to reflect the reality of Israeli troops protecting peaceful Israeli civilians from Arab extremists committing violent acts violating the tenets of their Koran, a kinder view of Israel would likely permeate the Muslim street. This is no easy task, but must be attempted as that one image is perhaps the most damaging albeit skewed empirical evidence maliciously indicting all Jews and their homeland, indirectly supporting all other vicious accusations and perceptions about this 'chosen' people, chosen to be the Middle East's scapegoat of choice. Propitiously altering the hearts and minds of ordinary Muslims is a daunting challenge, but ever necessary to avoid someday the likely alternative of another full blown battle between Jewish Israel and a synchronized force of Muslim jihadists. Preemptively disarming such Islamic militants is only possible if ordinary Muslims are smitten with clarifying logic, thus aggressively demand that their leaders rein in the radicals and be committed to peaceful coexistence with Israel. It's worth a try!

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

PRESIDENT'S SPEECH...A DISAPPOINTMENT
Posted by AFSI, January 24, 2007.

The president's speech last night was more disappointing to those who support and defend his initiatives in Iraq, than to those who oppose him, said Herbert Zweibon, Chairman of Americans for A Safe Israel.

"What is the point of mentioning Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia as part of the solution, when in fact, those nations play a duplicitous role as part of the problem. Who funds and abets terror? Who spreads jihad teaching and sermons throughout the Western democracies? Who helps build tunnels and delivers arms to terrorists? Who does not condemn Hezbollah mentioned by the President as terrorists?" Zweibon added.

"Furthermore, why throw them a sop in the form of a delusional pretense that a two state solution in the Arab/Israel conflict is possible? By doing so the President betrayed a loyal democratic ally in the frontline against the war on terror, and those of us who have come to expect real leadership, determination and integrity in the White House."

Israel and America deserve better.

Americans For a Safe Israel/AFSI is a pro-active pro-Israel advocacy group. AFSI may be contacted by mail at 1623 Third Ave., Suite 205, New York, N.Y. 10128 (Tel: 212-828-2424; Fax: 212-828-1717); by email at afsi@rcn.com; or by accessing its website: www.afsi.org. Barry Freedman is Executive Director.

To Go To Top

ISRAEL SHOULD OFFER SYRIA ... NOTHING
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 24, 2007.

Just when it looked like Ehud Olmert could not mess things up any worse than he already had, it was reported that he and his mates had been secretly negotiating a deal with Syria. Allegedly, Israel would reward Syria for 70 years of aggression by basically shrinking itself to its pre-1967 dimensions and returning to what Abba Eban once dubbed "Auschwitz borders."

Under the proposed deal, Israel would abandon the entire Golan Heights, which would be turned into a large "park" under joint Israeli-Syrian management. Israel and Syria would then demilitarize areas on both sides of this nice park, with the Syrian side's demobilized zone larger than Israel's. Israel would get a nice written set of promises from Syria -- one of those being to rein in Hizbullah.

The Syrian state-controlled TV and newspapers are already repudiating and denying the deal. Syrian intransigence may yet save the Jewish people from the mega-stupidity of Israeli political leaders, and not for the first time: a deal for a "return" of the Golan Heights to Syria was almost signed by Ehud Barak in 2000. Had it been concluded, it would have moved Syrian armed forces right up to the shores of the Sea of Galilee.

The Golan Heights are Syrian in precisely the same sense that East Prussia is German. In other words, not at all. Just like East Prussia was once German but was lost forever to the Germans due to German aggression and atrocities, so the Golan Heights are "Syrian" only in the historic sense.

The Golan is certainly far less "Syrian" than the Alexandretta Province, which belonged to Syria before World War II until Turkey decided one day to gobble it up. Syrian maps, of course, show both the Golan and Alexandretta as integral parts of Syria. Today the optimal peace plan that Israel should adopt is the same as that still used successfully by Turkey regarding Alexandretta: every time Syria starts bellowing and threatening, rattle the sabers and watch the Baathists cower.

The Golan Heights are not good for much besides attacking Israel. In fact, that is the real reason why Assad Jr. wants to get them back. Israeli proponents of "returning" the Golan to Syria argue that the Camp David accord with Egypt is a clear precedent for such a deal. After all, Israel agreed to give back to Egypt every last centimeter of Sinai. But the deal with Egypt was (or should be) a "first through the gate" one-time deal that in no way obligates Israel to strike a similar deal with Syria.

Camp David was signed almost 30 years ago, and only after Anwar Sadat came to Jerusalem and spoke in a convincing way to the Israeli public about peace. Assad Senior could have followed in Sadat's footsteps in the late 1970's and signed a peace deal with Israel, but he refused. Syria should be made to pay for three decades of foot dragging. It should also be forced to pay for its role in Hizbullah terror.

In other words, "land for peace" should decidedly not be the basis for any deal with Syria, unless it is to be land for peace in the form of Syria offering Israel additional lands east of the Golan.

The other important difference between Egypt and Syria is that Egypt is a large and powerful country, one with which Israel was willing to pay a huge price to end the outright state of war. But Syria, which already has partly lost its hegemony over Lebanon, is a relatively small, backward, poor country surrounded on all its borders (besides Lebanon) by pro-Western regimes friendly to the U.S.

There is no reason to believe Syria would comply with any deal it strikes with Israel. First, the Baathist junta represents a tiny ethnic-religious minority that could easily be toppled and replaced. The younger Assad is a dimwitted leader whose chances of ending up on a gallows like Saddam are not bad. Rather than reward the unstable Assad regime with the Golan Heights, a far better strategy would be to sit back and watch as Syria's economy collapses under its own centrally-controlled deadweight, the same way that Soviet regimes collapsed one after the other in the early 1990's.

All that Israel would get out of any deal with the Syrians would be yet another set of empty promises. Syria would follow up any agreement with a massive escalation of violence against Israel from Lebanon via its terrorist surrogates there. It would ignore all obligations for disarmament, in a Ruhr-Valley-style strategy of defiance.

In addition, Syria would use its presence along the shores of the Sea of Galilee to recruit and arm terrorists from among Israeli Arabs in the Galilee. It would station missiles and arms it receives from Iran on its soil, perhaps also weapons of mass destruction. The missile barrages this past summer on Northern Israel were a pale preview of what would follow.

Even the peace deal with Egypt has been to a large extent a failure. Egypt today supplies all the explosives and arms being smuggled into Gaza, including those used to build the rockets that bombard the Negev each morning. The Egyptian media are at least as anti-Semitic as the Iranian media. Egypt is accumulating huge stocks of military armaments and there is no guarantee it would not join in any future Arab armed assault on Israel.

Kal v'chomer, how much more so should there be reason for skepticism about Syrian behavior after any "peace deal" Syria signed with Israel.

In one of the Godfather movies, the young Don Corleone is asked what his offer is to a corrupt congressman. His answer: "We offer you nothing. Absolutely nothing." I can think of no better Israeli strategy for dealing with Damascus, at least until Syria evolves into a stable, democratic country seriously seeking peace with its neighbors.

(An opposing point of view is at
www.jewishpress.com/page.do/20450/For_Israeli%2DSyrian_Talks.html)

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

PALESTINIAN PROPAGANDA FILM PLAYING AT A THEATRE NEAR YOU, SOON
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 24, 2007.

First they succeeded in pressuring film makers in to altering film topics or plots in order to not present a message that they thought would portray Arab terrorists unfavorably. Thus the TV series "24-hours" spent most of its first year chasing rogue Russian bad guys who were doing what the Arab terrorists are doing in real life even though the original plots dealt with Arab terrorists.

Similarly, the Hollywood producers of a full-length feature film about Arab terrorists stealing nuclear missiles (I forgot its name: something like "worst of all fears") changed the plot, under pressure from CAIR, to make the terrorists not Arabs but Neo-Nazis.

Then they enjoyed the spate of films (unclear whether they funded these films or not) such as Munich, Passion, Flight Plan, V is for Vendetta, and a few others, which give subtle anti-Jewish or anti-Israel or pro-Arab or pro-terrorist messages.

Now, the Arab propaganda purveyors have moved on to full-length feature films in documentary formate which shift from subtle to sledge-hammer messages....and now we are on the verge of having to deal with full-blown black anti-Israel propaganda made in to living-room entertainment.

And, to make matters worse, the mega-oil-wealthy sheikhs seem to have bought the loyalty of such luminaries as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam, War on Want, Jewish Voice for Peace, and a growing host of professional journalists like Robert Fisk, as well as a large and ever-growing number of college academes...not to mention Jimmy Carter. And when these high-profile champions of human rights condemn Israel, people listen.

What can we do to counter this?

Does anyone know any one who may know some Hollywood moguls who would like to do a re-make of Exodus, brought up to date?

How about a documentary, a la Al Gore, about the threat of Arab terrorism and Israel as the 'canary in the mine shaft'?

If we do not do something to turn the tide of anti-Jewish and anti-Israel messages that are growing bolder and more aggressive and more distorting and more misleading, we will soon end up watching TV news and 'documentary' programs that are a 21st century version of cowboys and indians in which the Arab terrorists are the cowboys and Jews are the indians.

This is a written by Yakov Dov to the Editor of The Jewish World.

On January 23 my wife and I and some Christian friends of Israel, affiliated with Bridges for Peace attended the Palestinian propaganda film "Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land, How Israel Manipulates and Distorts the Media" at the Albany NY Public Library.

This was a slick,well produced propaganda film, undoubtedly paid for by Arab interests. Its theme was Palestinian victimology, blaming Israel for their poverty and misery, and the terrible Israeli occupation of their lands. We unfortunately heard Noam Chomsky, Neve Gordon, and Michael Lerner of Tikkun, who are opposed to Zionism and the rights of Jews to live in their ancient homeland, speak about the theme of Palestinian victimology; and to downplay Palestinian violence and terrorism as a result of Israeli occupation. I was surprised that they weren't joined by Naturei Karta in this propaganda film.

Amnesty International accused Israel of human rights violations. The American Arab Anti-Defamation Committee further accused Israel of Palestinian discrimination and criticized Israeli checkpoints that are necessary security measures to thwart Palestinian terrorism. Did anyone show how Palestinian schools, media and their religious leaders teach children to become suicide bombers and brainwash them in a cult of death and terror,committing them to Israel's destruction? No they repeated the wanton lies and canards that Israeli repression caused such terrorism.

We saw Alisa Solomon of the Village Voice And Robert Fisk of the British Independent further smear Israel, repeating the occupation victimology theme, as a reason for Palestinan terror. These Israel bashers blame Israel's consular staff for propaganda and media bias favoring Israel, also blaming AIPAC, CAMERA, etc for pro-Israel reporting in our media. This is the big lie as Hitler discovered, repeat it often enough and it will be accepted. The facts are that our media is often biased against Israel and CAMERA, Honest Reporting, etc are constantly challenging NPR,the NY Times, Washington Post, etc to tell the truth about Israel.

These Arabists and anti-Israel critics demonized Israeli settlers and even called Gilo [a Jerusalem suburb],a settlement.

Karen Pfeifer of the Arabist Middle East Research and Information Project, accused settlers of being aggressive to Palestinians and stealing their lands.

We should counter these lies about Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands. We can tell how Israel exists on about 20% of the lands of Palestine, and that Jews have lived in Judea/Samaria since Biblical times.These areas were made Judenrein following the Nazi model by Jordan, who destroyed former Jewish settlements. After winning the 1967 defensive war, Jews moved back into their former lands. They are revenants returning to their former homeland.

To speak of Israel as an occupier of Palestinian lands is a big lie. There were never any claims about this when Jordan controlled these areas prior to 1967. Before then there weren't any Palestinians either, as most of these Arabs lured by Israel's prosperity, flooded into these areas, falsely claiming them as their own. Arafat was an emigrant from Egypt.

They called themselves Palestinians after 1967, when Arafat's PLO encouraged them to do so, and to claim that they are victims of Israel. Yes the Palestinians are victims, victims of their hatred, neglect of their leaders, their cult of death and terror, and covenants calling for Israel's destruction.

How can we best reply to these canards and propaganda against Israel? We must stand up and confront these lies and propaganda and insist that Israel's side be presented in our public libraries, like showing Obsession or Relentless, and being pro active about Israel and the Mid East crisis.

I could have stayed to the end of this meeting, asked hard questions, and made strong pro-Israel comments. I've debated Arabs several times. However we were only a few amongst these Palestinian supporters. Had there been at least a dozen more committed Jews and Christians there, we could have made some strong points for support of Israel. However it is sad that some of our communal leaders don't believe in Israel activism.

Lets commit ourselves to stand by Israel more strongly in the public arena in the future.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

FOOLISH JEWISH LEADERS IN THE DIASPORA
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 24, 2007.

Some Jews are stupid -- If you want Israel to survive, you've got to accept the possibility that some are stupid and others might just be venal. If Jewish leaders before and during WWII had not mollified European and American Jewry and misled the governments they advised, the Holocaust could not have happened. Jews, Israel, are facing a second Holocaust today. Gaza was Czechoslovakia. If we allow the turn-over of the disputed territories to our enemies that Olmert and Livni are preparing, we will surely have reached the tipping point, the point of no return, the beginning of the second Holocaust.

Speaking at the 7th Herzliyah Conference yesterday, Shimon Peres completely discounts the psyche of the palestinian in particular and the Muslim in general -- Still pressing benighted peace efforts, he said, after 6 Wars and 2 Intifada, as only a lunatic could, "The plan is to take the border from Eilat to Yarmuch* and turn it into a joint economic area between us, the Jordanians, and the Palestinians. Infrastructure, airports, and roads will be built. We will manage the water reservoirs effectively. This will achieve a number of things including raising the standard of living and bringing global support". [*In the southern Golan, the Yarmuch and Rokad rivers form natural barriers, which is impassable for armored vehicles and even infantry. Therefore with just a few outposts Israeli troops can secure this front.]


The next are excerpts from Francisco Gil-White's Part 2: Historical and Investigative Research

www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders2.htm
"How mainstream Diaspora Jewish Leaders are failing the Jewish people today." It was written before the death of Arthur Hertzberg (April 2006), who, together with Edgar Bronfman and Abraham Foxman, unfortunately, typified those Jewish leaders who take sides against Israel.

Arthur Hertzberg is a historian and activist. He continued the World Jewish Congress tradition of criminal disregard for the security of the Jewish people, advancing his "equal voice" in the service of sabotaging the defense of Israel.

Consider that for Hertzberg, as Julius Weinberg explains, "it is Israel rather than the Arab countries surrounding it that has to prove its benign intentions to the world." Isn't that remarkable? These would be the same Arab countries that have launched wars against Israel with the proudly and publicly announced purpose of exterminating the Israeli Jews. So why does Hertzberg tell us that the Israelis are the ones who have to prove their benign intentions to the world? They haven't attacked anybody, let alone called for exterminating anyone.

That was 1979, but Hertzberg is consistent. On 19 September, 2003, The Jerusalem Post reported,

"In America, historian of Zionism Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg, like philanthropists Edgar Bronfman and Marvin Lender, has also chosen sides by appealing to President George W. Bush to put sanctions on Israel and to view Israel and the PA [the 'Palestinian Authority,' run by the PLO] as equivalents."

Hertzberg "has...chosen sides": he sides with the PLO. Rather passionately, I might add: he wants US sanctions on Israel. And Hertzberg's statements, mind you, were made right as the PLO was murdering scores of innocent Israelis at the height of the Second Intifada.

Now, when we saw Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg lobbying for the Jewish state to be considered equivalent to an organization, the PLO, whose controlling core Al Fatah was created by a leader of Adolf Hitler's Final Solution with the purpose of continuing the extermination of the Jewish people, how shall we characterize this? Would the word antisemitism be too strong? (But one can find Rabbi Hertzberg introduced as "a man of impeccable liberal credentials," so this is how you earn your 'liberal credentials' these days: attacking the Jews.)

Of course, Hertzberg sells his position as supposed compassion for the West Bank and Gaza Arabs (i.e. the so-called 'Palestinians'), and various sources will echo this: for example, Wikipedia refers to his "outspoken criticism of the policies of Israel toward the Palestinians." But this is absurd. It is the PLO that has been oppressing the West Bank and Gaza Arabs, not Israel. The serious problems for these Arabs began when, partly as a result of pressure coming from Hertzberg's World Jewish Congress (more on this below), the PLO was imposed on the Arabs as 'government.' Since then, not only has the PLO been murdering innocent Israeli civilians, but it has also been murdering innocent West Bank and Gaza Arabs, sometimes executing them merely for selling land to a Jew, or for opposing the killings of Jews, when it is not murdering them for opposing the PLO on other grounds. The Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza were treated infinitely better when the Israeli government was directly administering these territories, so genuine compassion for these Arabs would require Hertzberg to be a vocal opponent of the PLO, not Israel.

What is the political effect of this spectacle -- of Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg on the world stage behaving as if he has a rather special animosity against the Jewish state? Well, considering that the man has been "president of both the American Jewish Policy Foundation and the American Jewish Congress, [and] vice president of the World Jewish Congress," the effect on ordinary people (Jewish and non-Jewish alike), who are poorly informed, is to make them think: "Gee, if a leader of something calling itself the 'World Jewish Congress' says that Israel is the bad guy, then it must be -- because, how can Israel be the good guy if even the Jewish leadership attacks it?" As we saw in Part 1, in World War II Rabbi Stephen Wise had a similar effect on many people who otherwise would have defended the Jews: he confused and demoralized them. It is impossible to know exactly how many lives were lost this way, but given that Peter Bergson's movement managed to save some 200,000 people despite Wise's repeated acts of sabotage, as we saw in Part 1, the cost could be a few million.

More consistency: Since Rabbi Stephen Wise was the enemy of Peter Bergson (Hillel Kook), who was a founder of the Irgun Tzvai Leumi Jewish army, and who did his utmost to save Jewish lives in Europe while Wise sabotaged his every move, perhaps we shouldn't be surprised that Arthur Hertzberg was an enemy of the late Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, a former leader of the Irgun, and like Bergson a Jewish patriot.

Edgar Bronfman, President of the World Jewish Congress, ...suggested the [Jewish] settlements [in the West Bank and Gaza] were the key obstacle to peace and echoed [Hebrew University] professor [Ze'ev] Sternhell in advising the Palestinians that they would be wise to focus their terror attacks on settlers."
Source: Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome: Delusions of a people under siege. Hanover, NH: Smith and Kraus. (p.493)

The same year, 1981, that Arthur Hertzberg was sabotaging the effort to understand what Wise and Co. did during World War II, Edgar Bronfman, president of the World Jewish Congress (so, Hertzberg's boss), was working very hard to endorse US President Ronald Reagan's radically anti-Israel policies, which had for goal the creation of a PLO state in the West Bank. In 1982, Bronfman was at it again, using his perch as president of the World Jewish Congress to endorse Ronald Reagan's plan for Middle East 'peace.' Reagan was using Bronfman as a 'Jewish diplomat,' as if all Jews were the same and the World Jewish Congress spoke for them all, including citizens of Israel. American newspapers dutifully carried the headline "Jewish Leader OKs Reagan Peace Plan."

But Bronfman did not speak for the Israeli Jews: "the Israeli government...unanimously and totally rejected the American initiative."

The Israeli prime minister at the time was Menachem Begin, the former leader of the Irgun's military wing.

So there are no surprises here. Edgar Bronfman, like Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldmann before him, has been busy giving cover to the US government for its anti-Jewish policies. His support for Reagan's anti-Israeli policies in the early 80s was extreme.

Bronfman did the same in the mid-80s, when again as president of the World Jewish Congress, he acted as an informal diplomat for Shimon Peres, at the time Israel's prime minister. The diplomacy Bronfman conducted (mind you, Bronfman is not an Israeli citizen) was meant to do an end-run around Yitzhak Shamir from the opposition party, who was the actual foreign minister. And the point of this diplomacy, according to some reports, was to give away the strategic Golan Heights to the Syrians! At the same time, Peres sent leaders of the American Jewish Congress, another organization founded by Stephen Wise, to be his private diplomats to Arab leaders with whom he wanted to legitimize the PLO as a political player. Peres and Bronfman finally achieved their goals with the so-called Oslo 'Peace' Process, which empowered the PLO inside the Jewish state.

It apparently has not bothered Edgar Bronfman that Al Fatah, the controlling core of the PLO, was grandfathered by Hajj Amin al Husseini, responsible for one terrorist wave after another against innocent Jews in British Mandate 'Palestine,' and later one of the main architects of Adolf Hitler's Final Solution in Europe. Hajj Amin also mentored Yasser Arafat. And Bronfman, like Hertzberg, has been consistent throughout. In the year 2003,

"Edgar Bronfman, President of the World Jewish Congress, ...suggested the [Jewish] settlements [in the West Bank and Gaza] were the key obstacle to peace and echoed [Hebrew University] professor [Ze'ev] Sternhell in advising the Palestinians that they would be wise to focus their terror attacks on settlers."

When we see Edgar Bronfman advocating the murder of innocent Jews in order to advance the political goals of the PLO, an antisemitic terrorist organization with genocidal goals, and which traces its origin to Adolf Hitler's Final Solution, how shall we characterize this? Is the word antisemitism too strong?

This time, at least, "Jewish outrage forced [Bronfman] to apologize." Jewish outrage of this sort is healthy -- more of it may yet save the Jewish people.

Defending the Ford Foundation is not out of character for Abraham Foxman. It is not difficult to find this man apologizing for, and giving cover to, the PLO. For example, when Arafat was caught calling for jihad after the so-called Oslo 'peace' process had already begun, Abraham Foxman covered for him by supporting Arafat's oxymoronic expression "jihad for peace," helping confuse the Western public.

"Speaking to an Anti-Defamation League delegation in Gaza, Arafat said his use of the word 'jihad' in his speeches not only meant a holy war involving fighting, but also can be used in terms of peace.

'We asked the chairman to engage as much as possible in words of understanding and reconciliation,' said ADL National Director Abraham Foxman.

'The chairman talked in terms of the jihad for peace so that the word jihad as we know it can be converted into the jihad of peace.'"

Jihad means 'Holy War' -- the slaughter of infidels, as historian Bat Ye'or has documented in detail. But if anybody is suspicious that a Jewish historian may have distorted the meaning of 'jihad,' then we can ask the King of Saudi Arabia what the modern meaning of 'jihad' may be. This will be quite relevant to Yasser Arafat's own use of the word because Saudi Arabia has been a major sponsor of the PLO. As reported in the British daily The Evening Standard:

"In 1980, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia gave a clear definition: 'What is meant by jihad is a united, comprehensive, integrated Arab-Islamic confrontation in which we place all our resources and our spiritual, cultural, political, material and military potential in a long and untiring 'Holy War' against Israel, of course, who else?'"

If Abraham Foxman's excuse here will be that he doesn't know this elementary thing -- the meaning of the word 'jihad' for Muslim enemies of the Jewish state -- then he should be fired, because it is the job of the leader of the ADL to know such things. If he does know this, then how shall we characterize the fact that Foxman apologizes for the anti-Jewish terrorist Yasser Arafat when he calls for "a long and untiring 'Holy War' against Israel"? Would antisemitism be too strong a word?

As if all this were not enough, Abraham Foxman can also be found apologizing for the Vatican's antisemitism. Unbelievable.

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

IDF'S IMPOSSIBLE TASK; ISRAEL SAVES THE ENEMY; UNORTHODOX ORTHODOX; JIMMY CARTER'S FINANCIAL BACKGROUND; ISRAEL VS. ZIONISM
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 24, 2007.

OVER-EAGER SENATORS DODD & KERRY

Undermining US foreign policy, the Senators went to ask the President of Syria to help bring stability and security to Iraq (NY Sun, 12/21, p.6).

That is like going to ask Hitler and Stalin how they could bring stability and security to Poland they were about to conquer. Now it is more foolish, because we know how dictators act. They don't cooperate to undo their program of imperialism.

The dictator might promise to cooperate. The resulting newspaper story makes him seem reasonable, when the real story is how to bind him. Those Senators, one of whom wants to be President, do not understand the world war we are in and did not take the time to learn about the enemy.

SHARON'S BLUNDER VERIFIED

PM Olmert is following PM Sharon's precedent of offering to release hundreds of terrorists in return for a very few Israelis. Sharon got back three Israeli bodies and one suspected Israeli drug smuggler. Prof. Steven Plaut predicted that this deal would be followed by more kidnappings, in order for terrorists to get more prisoners freed.

In an Israeli trial of drug dealers, the released prisoner testified that indeed he was a drug smuggler. Thus it was to get back a criminal that Israel released hundreds of terrorists, half of whom resumed terrorism and attacked more Israelis than were recovered in the deal (Plaut, 12/20).

Now that PM Olmert indicated he would follow Sharon's lead, Israeli security forces have intercepted terrorists about to attempt to kidnap more Israelis, admittedly in the hope of getting a disproportionate number of their allies released. It is one of the ways by which the Arabs are defeating Israel. Israeli security forces capture many terrorists, but the politicians put them back onto the streets.

"LIMIT TO ISRAELI RESTRAINT?"

Since the ceasefire started, and Israel ordered its forces not to stop terrorist crews from firing rockets, the Arabs have fired rockets at Israel almost every day, often more than once. The government often warns the P.A., there is a limit to Israeli restraint (IMRA, 12/21).

What that asserted limit is, nobody knows. The Arabs are trying to find out. That is why they fire rockets day after day.

Who can respect a government that complies with a ceasefire called by an enemy that does not comply with it? (Even if it did comply, it would be like having honored a ceasefire with the German forces defeated in the Battle of the Bulge, letting Germany refresh its depleted stores.)

Israel should have bombarded the P.A. after the first violation, not let its worry about foreign public relations put its people at risk. Humanitarians who thus try to keep down enemy casualties are, in my opinion, criminally negligent. The immediate object of war is to kill the enemy. When the enemy is genocidal, killing him is virtuous.

AMERICA'S & ISRAEL'S TERRORISTS

Iran is arming Hamas. To counter that, the US is accelerating its training and arming of Abbas's forces. Training would be in counterterrorism and police functions. Some of those forces would be deployed at the Gaza border, through which rockets are smuggled in.

The US also is encouraging Israel to bolster Abbas. Israel is releasing some excise taxes to Abbas (Eli Lake, NY Sun, 12/21, p.6).

Abbas has enough forces to guard the Gaza border, but he doesn't. He gets his cut of the smuggled arms.

Abbas is a long-time terrorist who is different from Hamas, as far as the US and Israel is concerned, only in being more of an opportunist in combining diplomacy with military means. His goals and military means are the same as Hamas'. His media broadcast hatred of the US and Israel and praise for suicide bombers. He talks about peace, but so did Arafat, who made war.

Supporting Abbas is not consistent with the US war against Islamism. US policy in supporting that common enemy of mankind is foolish. Israel should not support that foolishness but expose it.

If the US wants to counteract Hamas, let it arm Israel. Let the US stop demanding that Israel withdraw forces and checkpoints that block terrorists.

EGYPTIAN ISLAMIST GROUP REFORMS

The al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya organization of Egypt, which had been violent for some time, has reformed. It apologized for past violence, pledges co-existence with the Egyptian regime, and argues against al-Qaeda's philosophy of violence.

The organization rationalized its change as accepting that non-religious law if humane and consistent with religious law is a satisfactory way of handling daily problems. They won't reject democracy, just because it comes from the West. The Muslim ruler may suspend certain religious laws, such as requiring certain punishments or allowing full pilgrimage to Mecca, if necessary to maintain domestic peace or prevent currency problems. Fatwas, such as the ones originally against the Mongols before they converted to Islam, no longer are realistic. Therefore, they need not be obeyed. Even jihad may cause more force to be leveled against the Islamists, and therefore may be rejected as impractical. Jihad against Muslim countries has been harmful. Violence against infidel civilians and tourists, formerly attacked, is forbidden. All the organization requires is that the ruler not celebrate secular systems as superior to the religious ones.

Other Islamists who relinquished violence did not relinquish to goal of imposing religious law. Some members of al-Gama'a still believe in violence (MEMRI, 12/21).

ARE CAMPAIGN SPENDING & SPENDING CURBS DEMOCRATIC?

The more Congress tries to limit campaign spending, the more is spent. Poorly drafted legislation easily gets circumvented. The spending increase enables American voters to "be the best informed in the history of democracy." (NY Sun,12/21, Ed..)

Spending should not be equated with information. Much of the spending increase would be due to an increase in the number of candidates. Much will be spent on polls. Polls enable candidates to fashion appealing sound bytes that mislead voters about candidates' intent. Much of the funds will be spent on brief TV ads that express false sentiment, false logic, and misleading conclusions about opposition candidates.

Negative advertising about opposition candidates is not inherently wrong. But it often is abused. There is much wrong with characterizing a multi-faceted bill only for its negative or its positive aspect, and blaming it on the opponent. Would that legislators draft briefer bills, whose import could be seen as not potentially harmful! New York State legislators pass lobbyists' bills without having read them.

If spending curbs gave major candidates equal access to voters, they would be democratic. The Sun calls a candidate's spending a fortune "free speech." I think it is not democratic when the electorate hears much more from one candidate than from another, and if the big spender got the funds from special interest groups by pandering to them. Voters don't really get a free choice, that way.

As for spending curbs being poorly drafted, that isn't the whole story. The problem is the same as with pornography. Pornography cannot be banned totally, because in the end it cannot be totally defined and censorship becomes political. Spending curbs eventually curb free speech. There may be no solution, though public campaign funding at least could give a candidate sufficient funds to get a message across. The problem is, there may be no message, just sound bytes.

In the last election, the same candidates sent the same leaflets bearing brief and meaningless messages every couple of days. Candidates for one office expressed testimonials for candidates for another office, who returned the favor. How sincere was that? The leaflets promise too much for too many, but state too little about how to accomplish those feats and who would pay for them and how. Sen. Clinton is getting known for assertions of vague principles.

Issues are discussed shallowly and without much debate. There isn't much democratic substance to our elections.

ASSIGN IMPOSSIBLE TASKS TO THE IDF

PM Olmert had assigned the Army to block arms smuggling into Gaza, but denied it the means, such as guarding the border. Now Defense Min. Peretz ordered the IDF to stop the Arabs from firing rockets at Israel without breaking down the ceasefire that the Arabs violated by firing dozens of rockets, etc.. It is an impossible task, assigned as if intended to shift the blame for continued firing to the Army and to pretend that only more territorial concessions would stop it (Dr. Aaron Lerner, IMRA, 12/21).

ISRAEL SAVES THE ENEMY

Wounded in mutual combat, members of Hamas and Fatah can't get treated in certain Gaza hospitals, because of their affiliations. (The brief doesn't say whether hospital personnel would refuse them, whether the hospital lacks security and their fine foes would pursue them right into the hospital, or why a hospital that won't treat Fatah men wouldn't take the Hamas men and vice versa.)

The casualties have been admitted to an Israeli hospital for treatment (IMRA, 12/21).

How humane of Israel! And how inhumane! It is one thing to treat wounded prisoners. It is another thing to suspend border closure to let in enemy troops and restore them for combat. It is a particular Israeli insanity that poses as humanitarianism and contributes to Israel's defeats. Israeli officials probably think this mercy wins public opinion. For all Israeli decency and Muslim brutality, public opinion is anti-Israel. Israel contributes to its own low standing by pretending that some Muslims are moderate and can make peace, instead of exposing them as all wanting to destroy the Jewish state but many also wanting to murder off the Jewish people, but differing in the means and timing.

The hospital policy contradicts Olmert's and Sharon's declared policy of separation of the two peoples (religions). For that policy, they dragged 10,000 Jews out of Gaza, ruining them, and in return got a P.A. military buildup and a rocket bombardment. Like the US, Israel fights in a limited way, and then wonders why it can't get rid of the war.

ISRAEL STRENGTHENING THE NORTH

The government is further subsidizing Haifa and points north, to which it urges Israelis to move (IMRA, 12/21).

That's where Hizbullah rockets will strike, next. This static defense is futile. An effective defense would root out the terrorists.

UNORTHODOX ORTHODOX

Hundreds of Land of Israel activists marched on Rachel's Tomb, demanding the right of Jews to travel freely in their own country. They want an end to walls and fences and other restrictions on them, including access to such holy places.

While the procession diverted security guards, dozens of youths dug under the fence and gained entry. Their point was that if they could breach security in a public confrontation, then the fences don't provide security (Arutz-7, 12/21).

They want to treat this unallocated part of the Jewish homeland as part of the Jewish homeland. The government wants to treat it as reserved for the Arabs. The demonstrators are consistent with the Palestine Mandate. The government is consistent with anti-Zionism. The demonstrators have a healthy Judaism. The government has an unhealthy secularism. The demonstrators would preserve Israel. The government gets Israelis killed by prolonging the war, by failing to defeat the Arabs, and by failing to make general war on the P.A..

WHY ISRAEL CONTINUES ONE-WAY CEASEFIRE?

The Arabs have fired 50 rockets at Israelis, since declaring a ceasefire that only Israel honors. (There will be more, by the time I transmit this.) Why does Israel persist?

News reports indicate that Israeli leaders don't want to announce the end of the ceasefire and be blamed for ending it.

If true, the reason is silly. Israel is blamed for everything, anyway. Israel cannot redeem its reputation in this world of media bias that preserves ignorance and bias. At least, it cannot win over public opinion without a public relations campaign it doesn't have and wouldn't know how to direct or what proper positions to take. The campaign would have to show the evil it is up against. It would have to challenge popular misconceptions. That it won't do, because it is afraid to, and because much of the ruling Establishment shares the anti-Jewish prejudices, and because in its appeasement-mindedness, it clings to hopes for peace with a religion that fights to the death.

Wouldn't it be the simplest thing to show reporters damage from rockets and then explain that the ceasefire never was kept by the Arabs and therefore Israel finds there is no ceasefire for it to honor? It should condemn the Arabs for breaking the ceasefire. A simple history of Arab violations of other ceasefires should given to reporters.

Enemies of Israel want the phony ceasefire to continue. They don't mind Israeli casualties. They don't care that the enemy uses immunity from Israeli retaliation to build up forces for a greater war. They, especially the anti-Zionist State Dept., want to keep up the pretense that there can be peace to negotiate Israeli concessions for. In justice, Israel should demand concessions for not wiping out an evil people.

NEGOTIATIONS WITH S. ARABIA

Although S. Arabia and Israel deny that the two countries are negotiating ("holding talks"), a US ambassador didn't. He cited a statement from Israeli "Indefense" Minister

Peretz that the basis for peace negotiations might be the Saudi plan. Admittedly the Saudi plan is a plan for Israeli concessions after which, the Arabs (falsely) promise, they would recognize the legitimacy of Israel. Israelis say they wouldn't make some of the concessions. The Arabs always propose buy-now/pay-later, and then don't pay.

Israel doesn't derive legitimacy from concessions. It should state that, as the victim of aggression, the Arabs owe it plenty, and it will not make concessions to them. It should ask rhetorically and actually whether the request for concessions is part of Islamic policy of using concessions as the basis for waging stronger war. It should ask how this asserted desire for peace fits in with decades of promoting jihad. It should ask, what concessions does it owe people who attempt genocide against it. It should ask, why don't the aggressors simply cease aggression, if they want peace.

When Israel starts negotiating on the premise that it owes the enemy concessions, it makes concessions, usually more than the public imagined. That is what the State Dept. wants to maneuver it to do. It also is what Israel's anti-Zionist leadership wants to do.

PREJUDICE AGAINST MUSLIMS

Six Muslim clerics prayed in the public area of a US airport, in November. That made other passengers on their US Airways flight suspicious about them. They complained to officials. Officials removed the clerics from the flight (Arutz-7, 12.21). In a newspaper report, the passengers were quoted as hearing them express hatred of the US.

Hatred of the US is not reason enough. If it were, many liberals would have to be deplaned, too. Unlike US liberals, however, Muslims have translated their hatred into terrorism. Vigilance must be exercised. Prayers, alone, should not make other passengers nervous. That is prejudice.

JIMMY CARTER'S FINANCIAL BACKGROUND

When Carter was President, his Budget director was old friend, Bert Lance. Lance owned a bank in Georgia that he mismanaged. (Was mismanagement a qualification for becoming Carter's Budget director?)

Enter the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). It was founded by a Pakistani and subsidized by Saudis to spread Islam and fight Zionism. It financed PLO terrorism, Islamist overthrow of the Shah, and the Pakistani nuclear weapons program. BCCI money helped persuade Sadat to sign the Camp David Accords that recognized "Palestinian" rights. It tried illegally to buy the First American Bank, based in Washington, DC ... BCCI was convicted for drug money laundering.

Just in time for Lance, BCCI made him a $100,000 a year consultant. The BCCI or its officials paid off Lance's $3.5 million debt to his own bank, and took secret control of it. When Carter became President, BCCI asserted that it would not take advantage of Lance's closeness to the President. (Judge its scruples over that by its record.)

The Georgia bank, now controlled by Islamists, renegotiated its loan to the Carter family business, at much more favorable terms to Carter. BCCI's founder, Abedi, "gave $500,000 to help the former president establish his center at Emory University. Later, Abedi contributed more than $10 million to Mr. Carter's different projects." Even after the BCCI conviction, "Mr. Carter accepted $1.5 million from Abedi, his 'good friend.'" Saudi and other Gulf sources contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to the Carter Center.

Soon after taking office, Carter spoke of a "Palestinian" homeland (which it isn't) and increasingly denounced Israeli self-defense as aggression against those Arabs. He went on to uphold the legitimacy of Arafat's corrupt (and terrorist) regime, and now calls (Islamist and terrorist) Hamas the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people. He, who has accepted hundreds of millions of dollars from the Arabs, said, "'There has not been any nation in the world that has been more cooperative than Saudi Arabia,' the New York Times quoted Mr. Carter June 1977, thus making the Saudis a major factor in U. S. foreign policy." But Carter accuses AIPAC of controlling State Dept. policy and keeping the Palestinian Arabs poor and oppressed (Rachel Ehrenfeld, 12/21) not their representatives who steal their money and waste it on wars and villas. So you see, closeness to Saudis is not a Bush monopoly. Who can have confidence in Carter's avocation of certifying the democratic character of foreign elections?

ISRAEL FACILITATES CHRISTIAN ACCESS ON CHRISTMAS

As of before Christmas, 450,000 Christians crossed from Bethlehem in the P.A. to Jerusalem. Israel is spending half a million shekels to improve the crossing. It is providing gifts and free buses to transport 18,000 Christian pilgrims from Bethlehem to Jerusalem. It knows that tourism is important for the P.A. economy.

At Vatican and P.A. request, Israel's Min. of Tourism also opened up Jerusalem to the pilgrims' tour guides from the P.A.. Problem is, the tourists will get only the P.A. point of view and not Israel's, at a time when tourism is important for Israel's economy and its own tour guides do not have sufficient work.

Israel complains about having poor public relations, yet replaces Israeli tour guides with Arab ones. Israel lacks common sense about public relations (IMRA, 12/22).

Israel acts as if its mission is to help its enemies. It thinks that this treason is a fine achievement. I happen to be reading a story book about Biblical times, and find Judea-Samaria's perverse leadership then like the perversely blind leadership now. Then the leadership pursued foreign gods, now it shuns its own. The parallels are striking.

THE AD OF THE WEEK IN REVIEW

The New York Times Week in Review of 12/24 carried a full-page ad from the Council for the National Interest Foundation in behalf, not of the national interest, but ostensibly of Christian Arabs. The title was, "Is Bethlehem Dying?" Yes, it averred, the city is being choked off by the Israeli security fence in defense of an occupation.

The ad accuses Israel of fencing properties in half and cutting off the town. The reason for the fence -- Arab terrorism for jihad right near Israel's capital -- and Jewish claims to the Territories were not stated. Neither was any perspective on how many properties were divided and the extensive Israeli re-routing of the fence to avoid that. I don't know whether any of the accusations are true, but I know of several that are false.

"In reality, that 'fence' consists of a 25-foot concrete wall built across 26 miles inside the W. Bank..." No, only a short piece is of concrete. The lie makes Israel seem sinister. "The Wall, paid for with billions of dollars of US tax money." No US funds go for the wall. US funds go for Abbas' forces, which fire upon Israelis. The ad condemns Israel for immuring Rachel's Tomb, without explaining that this is to protect Jewish worshippers upon whom Muslim bigots open fire.

The Christian population of Bethlehem largely has fled, from Muslim attacks. That is what is ending its Christian character. The ad fails to admit this. The ad quotes Christian leaders there, but they are too oppressed by the Muslims to be frank.

GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL SHIFTS MILITARY PROCUREMENT

The Council used to buy mostly intelligence-gathering systems. Now anticipating war, i is shifting purchases to arms, for active combat (IMRA, 12/21).

PERETZ ASKS OLMERT TO RECONSIDER POLICY OF RESTRAINT

(IMRA, 12/21.) The weakness of Israel's parliamentary coalition government is: (a) Officials of different ideologies or rival ambition maneuver against each other instead of against the enemy; and (b) As in the Sharon regime, the Prime Minister won't listen to wiser counsel, though he keeps creating problems for his country and becomes more unpopular.

U.S. VS. SYRIA

The Bush administration is considering clandestine financing of Syrian opposition elements. Some critics think the opposition is too weak to matter. Others suggest that the Administration is reluctant to pursue the plan, because regime-change requires Congressional oversight, and some Members of Congress would oppose this plan done in the name of spreading democracy. Some recipients would be Islamists (IMRA, 12/21).

The critics make some good points. Islamists are our enemies. They don't believe in democracy, though they may use an election to gain power.

The article gives the impression that Members of Congress would oppose the plan because it is done to spread democracy. I doubt that would be their reason.

The US made its big mistake in letting its Army diminish in size, so it couldn't invade Syria and Iran along with Iraq, and shut off the Islamist help for wars in Iraq, Lebanon, Israel, etc.. The US should have helped the opposition in Iran and Lebanon, where it is strong. It should have urged Israel to send its ground forces into Lebanon, in strength, earlier, and wipe out Hizbullah and bomb supply trucks bringing arms from Syria to Hizbullah.

DON'T TAKE ISRAELI LITERALLY

Environment Min. Ezra has proposed a ceasefire, giving the Arabs 10 days to adhere to it or Israel should shut off their electricity and water. Weeks have passed, without P.A. adherence. Min. Ezra was asked whether Israel should end the ceasefire and shut off P.A. electricity and water.

Ezra replied that "10 days" was a rough statement and "electricity and water" was a metaphor for action. He suggests that the IDF study what to do (IMRA, 12/21).

Israelis talk big. Their media fails to pin them down, because they share in the charade. The ceasefire is an Islamic fraud. The Arabs are acting in their usual way of violating ceasefires. No more time is needed to demonstrate their insincerity. The government's excessive patience with the Arabs needlessly risks Israeli lives.

Asking for an IDF study is a ruse. It has made studies. It has made recommendations. Its recommendations are rejected by the appeasement-minded government, taking instruction not from AIPAC but from the State Dept..

RUSSIA MAY GET BERTHS IN SYRIAN PORTS

If Russia lowers the price of its missile defense system for Syria, Syria may give the Russian navy berths in Syrian ports (IMRA, 12/21).

That would make it more difficult for Israel to fight Syria without bringing Russia into it.

ISRAEL VS. ZIONISM

Decades ago, a Jewish organization bought land in Hebron. It recently transferred ownership to Hebron Jews. But Arabs had taken over and expropriated property owned by Jews there and elsewhere in Judea-Samaria. (This is a story seldom told.)

Three Jewish families bought a building there from its Arab occupant. (Shouldn't have to pay the recipient of stolen property.) The military and judiciary asked the families to move out while the government prepared a property contract for them.

The Arab sellers suddenly claimed that their property transfer contract was forged (which claim Arabs have made, before.) Instead of honoring the government's agreement, the Attorney-General ruled that the new property contract was invalid. He ordered the families to stay out, and when they attempted to move back in, to be removed. The Supreme Court ruled that they should stay out until the matter was investigated. Two newspapers reported erroneously that the Court had ruled that the property contract was forged. For that, the newspapers had to pay the Jewish families compensation for libel.

In one case, a court noted, the removal is contrary to Israeli law, which allows people to keep a home in which they have been for more than 30 consecutive days. It ruled that that family may stay (Arutz-7, 12/22). The government of Israel acts in bad faith. It is almost Biblical in its injustice to its Jewish people and their religion.

IRAN'S VULNERABLE ECONOMY

Iran's population has doubled since the revolution. Unemployment and poverty are rampant, despite higher oil prices. Government subsidy of gasoline has raised demand and pollution artificially, requiring imports from foreign refiners. Fulfilling the threat to curb crude oil shipments would hurt its sales and consumers. Its economy would collapse, since hydrocarbons account for most of its income. It needs the oil business at least as much as the oil business needs it.

US sanctions, Iranian threats to nationalize oil companies, and Iranian instability have shut off most foreign investment in Iran. Iran's increase in demand for electricity is so great, that it might need civilian nuclear power. However, its own reserves for nuclear ore would be consumed in only four years (IMRA, 12/22). World reserves are low, too.

DARFUR CHANGE

Most of the Arabs in Darfur are not involved in the civil war there. Some of them, however, have joined the rebels, decrying the murderousness of the government's Darfur allies as un-Islamic. They now pose a threat to the government (IMRA, 12/22).

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

WATCH HIS HANDS!
Posted by Batya Medad, January 24, 2007.

Olmert is a champ at the cup trick. I have no doubt that his "policy changes" are all well-calculated to confuse us.

Olmert knows perfectly well what he wants and what he believes in. The problem is that he masks things and "moves the cups" so quickly that we lose track of what is really transpiring. That's how he has planned it.

Before Olmert was even elected Israel's Prime Minister, he haughtily announced a the Herzilya Conference that Israel was withdrawing from most of Judea and Samaria, just "consolidating settlement in a couple of blocs." The fact that dozens of long-standing, strategic communities would be destroyed and tens of thousands of innocent, law-abiding citizens exiled from their homes, business and educational institutions destroyed, didn't rate in his list of priorities. He was too "high" on the praise of the world, which didn't care when European Jewry was being slaughtered by the Nazis and hasn't become warmer to live Jews since. They enjoy and appreciate their visits to Yad Veshem, but they won't come to Shiloh or the University in Ariel.

Later on Olmert announced that it wasn't a "good time" for a unilateral withdrawal. Some people felt that it meant that he had canceled the plan, but reading his statements carefully just showed that it was a delay for tactical reasons.

And now, he visited the Disengagement Refugee Camps, tsk-tsking about the fact that the "two-year building prediction" is ridiculously far behind schedule. In half a year, we will be mourning the Second Anniversary of the Destruction of Gush Katif and the Northern Shomron Jewish communities. At the same time it has been revealed that Olmert has has agreed in principle to withdraw from most of Judea and Samaria ("Yesha"), in secret talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. G-d forbid!

In the meantime, that "wall" is still going up, cutting us off from the ghetto called the State of Israel. It's not going to keep anyone safe. The politicians are claiming that the "wall" is proving effective. Terrorism has gone down. That sounds nice, but look at those statistics clearly. Where has terrorism gone down? It has going down equally, all over, meaning both sides of that wall. If the wall was the reason, then terrorism would have continued at the same rate or even higher on my side. But it hasn't.

The reduction in terrorism is the result of the Arabs' change in policy. It has nothing to do with the wall at all! The Arabs have more freedom of movement than people think. They aren't strip-searched, either.

Things aren't as they appear.

We can't relax our guard with Olmert in the Prime Minister's Office.

Batya Medad lives in Shiloh. She can be reached by email at Shilohmuse@yahoo.com or visit her website http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/ or go to http://www.shilo.org.il

To Go To Top

A GOVERNMENT'S COUP D'ETAT
Posted by David Bedein, January 24, 2007.

Jerusalem -- Israel is preparing for a unilateral realignment in Judea and Samaria that includes the expulsion of tens of thousands of Israel citizens in order to establish some semblance of a temporary Palestinian state.

The Israeli government has formed an special team was to formulate the outline for carrying out an immediate handover of land.

The team includes high-ranking officials in the Foreign and Defense Ministries, and high-ranking representatives of the Israeli army and Israeli intelligence are also being updated about the process.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzippi Livni and the director-general of her ministry, Aharon Abramowitz, appointed a high-ranking official who will coordinate the effort -- diplomat Yossi Amrani, the former Israeli consul in San Francisco.

In November 2003, this reporter revealed that Amrani, despite his official position as the Israeli consul, organized fund raising events for Israeli opposition leader Yossi Beilin. Beilin had then led the Geneva Initiative on December 1st, 2003, which called for the unilateral establishment of a Palestinian entity within temporary borders, under the unchallenged rule of the PLO.

Now Amrani has been given the task of formulating, within several weeks, an official working paper of the Israeli government which will give a detailed outline of Israel's immediate surrender of land to the PLO. Among other things, Amrani will deal with the question of how Israel should sell the plan to AIPAC and to the U.S. administration.

During last summer's war in Lebanon, Prime Minister Olmert was quoted as saying that the war would contribute to his plans for carrying out a withdrawal plan.

The statement, which was denied by the Prime Minister's Bureau, aroused a great deal of criticism, mainly because thousands of religious soldiers, many of them inhabitants of the settlements, were risking their lives on the front at that very time.

Olmert therefore had to clarify that the option of unilateral withdrawal was frozen, and even said that it had never been adopted as Israel's official policy.

He said that the only policy in effect was that of negotiations with Abu Mazen and the continued boycott of the Hamas government. Olmert is consistent in this position, and has reiterated it several times since the cease-fire in mid-August.

Ironically, a previous commission was established by Israeli Foreign Minister Livni to evaluate the idea of a unilateral withdrawal from most of the West Bank.

That commission's report, leaked to the Ha'aretz newspaper on Aug. 15 concluded that "Israel has no security solution to the threat of rockets launched from the West Bank against population centers."

The report's authors assumed that following any unilateral Israeli pullout from any part of Judea and Samaria, Hamas will takeover and deploy rockets against Israel's population centers on Israel's coastal plain.

The report emphasized that the only solution to the missile threat that the Israel Defense Forces has to offer is its actual presence in the territories and control of the high ground of Judea and Samaria, also known as the "West Bank."

Another conclusion of the report commissioned by the Israeli Foreign Minister is that Israel will not gain international recognition for an end to the occupation if it continues to hold significant portions of the West Bank.

Foreign Ministry Director General Aharon Abramovitch, headed that commission.

Israeli Member of the Knesset (MK) has asked for a copy of the previous Israeli foreign ministry report which warned against any unilateral surrender of territory to the PLO.

The spokesman of the Israel Foreign Ministry has informed MK Alon's aide that this was an "internal report" that it would not be released.

Mashaal-Abu Mazen Meeting Ends In Failure

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, met in Damascus on Sunday with Hamas political bureau director Khaled Mashaal, against the backdrop of the crisis over the establishment of a Palestinian national unity government.

The meeting was held after exhausting negotiations were held in an attempt to bridge the gaps between the two parties. Ultimately, in response to massive pressure from the Syrian mediators, the Iranians and Islamic Jihad, a decision was made to hold the meeting despite the differences. Mashaal arrived at Abu Mazen's hotel suite, which was where the meeting was held. At first, the parties held an expanded work meeting that was attended by delegates from Fatah and Hamas, after which Abu Mazen and Mashaal sequestered themselves for a one-on-one meeting that lasted an hour.

Fatah and Hamas officials said before the meeting that they did not expect it to produce a dramatic breakthrough, but said they hoped the meeting would allow for a resumption of negotiations between the parties. Officials in Damascus said Sunday night that the importance of the meeting was that it broke the ice not only between the leaderships of Fatah and Hamas, but also between the two leaders, whose relations have been rocky and who have not spoken with one another for more than a year and a half.

Upon the conclusion of the meeting, the two men emerged to speak to journalists. While both Abu Mazen and Mashaal came out smiling, they were unable to conceal the fact that the meeting had failed. Mashaal, who said unequivocally that his organization would not recognize Israel either directly or indirectly, rejected de facto the compromise wording that could have allowed for the establishment of a national unity government and could have ended the impasse.

The current assessment is that there is no real chance that a Palestinian national unity government will be formed both because of the unyielding positions held by Hamas and the official statement that the party issued, which read: "there is a consensus within Hamas that Ismail Haniya will be the prime minister."

In an attempt to camouflage the failure, Abu Mazen and Mashaal issued a joint statement that described the meeting as "positive," and which noted that "dialogue between Hamas and Fatah will continue in the coming days."

At the same time, the Palestinian news agency, Ma'an, reported last night that "The Hamas movement has announced that it will resume the national dialogue on Tuesday. The talks will recommence from where they ended after the previous month-long round of talks between the factions, particularly between the two rival factions of Hamas and Fatah"

Citizens Concerned Hamas Is Digging Under Kibbutz

Israeli Army intelligence officials fear that Hamas will be able to carry out a terror attack in one of the communities in the Western Negev by means of a tunnel, or perhaps another kidnapping, like the kidnapping of soldier Gilad Shalit to Gaza.

Residents of Kibbutz Nirim, located in the Western Negev near Gaza, recently reported that they heard knocking under their houses during the day, which could indicate tunnel digging. Kibbutz members are concerned that Palestinians will dig tunnels under the border fence and perpetrate a terror attack inside the kibbutz. The kibbutz secretary, Gadi Yarkoni, said yesterday that: "Members heard knocking several months ago that raised concern of tunnel digging. The IDF checked and nothing was found. Because of the sensitivity of the area, we take every little thing seriously, and we treated theses complaints seriously and brought in everyone we thought necessary."

Avi Yakar, a member of Nirim, added that "There is noise in the kibbutz and the IDF checked. We heard noise, and there was a lot of speculation. No one can say for certain that tunnels are being dug, but I don't know anyone who will rule this out. Perhaps it is the noise of distant water pumps, but there is noise and it can be heard from time to time in various parts of the kibbutz."

About three months ago, the daily Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv reported that a terror organization from the Gaza Strip plans to dig a tunnel under Kibbutz Nir-Oz in the Western Negev, in order to carry out a terror attack against soldiers and civilians. The report spoke about attempts by an Arab terror group to dig a tunnel, and in order to do so, it offered the owner of a plot near the Gaza border a sum of $40,000 in exchange for his agreement to rent the land for a year so as to dig the tunnel.

David Bedein is Bureau Chief, Israel Resource News Agency. (http://Israelbehindthenews.com). He is president of Center for Near East Policy Research. Contact him by email at media@actcom.co.il

This appeared in The Philadelphia Bulletin
www.thebulletin.us/site/printerFriendly.cfm?brd=2737& dept_id=585832&newsid=17740149

To Go To Top

SHADOW BOXING WITH IRAN; A WORLD WITHOUT ISRAEL
Posted by Michael Travis, January 23, 2007.

1. Shadow boxing with Iran
by Anshel Pfeffer
Jerusalem Post
January 22, 2007
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467786077& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

All six Herzliya conferences to date have dealt extensively with the Iranian threat, but as the founder-chairman of the conference, Prof. Uzi Arad, says, "In the past we took care to amplify the issue and explain why it's more serious than all the other threats around. This year, we're getting close to the tachlis (practical details)."

That seemed to be the thread running through all the lectures on the subject, with each participant trying outflank the clich that time is running out. Original neo-con Richard Perle, now of the American Enterprise Institute, went straight to the point when he pointed to the stopwatch limiting each speaker's time. "Whose time is over, ours or Iran's?" he asked.

The speakers were equally divided between Americans and Israeli, and they all were singing from the same hymn-sheet: There's no time to waste anymore dissecting the Iranians' ideology and intentions, there are no more question marks. Everyone seemed to be echoing Binyamin Netanyahu's now familiar refrain, "It's 1938, Iran is Germany, and it's arming itself with nuclear weapons."

Perhaps it was the choice of speakers, but there seemed to be very little variation in the overall message. It began with the modulated diplomatic tones of US Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns, who, without actually saying how, assured that under no circumstance would the US allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons, rising in pitch and decibels to the crescendos of Perle and Maj.- Gen. (res.) Prof. Itzik Ben-Yisrael, who left few illusions that the US and Israel would soon be launching their attacks.

But the consensus that Iran is well on its way to the bomb turned out to be less clear-cut than most newspaper headlines would lead you to believe. Gary Samore, director of studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, who analyzed the advances being made in Iran on the various fronts necessary for reaching full weapons capability, concluded that it was still quite a few more years off. Not the usual scare that they're all but there, and no one contradicted him.

In a rare public appearance, Ariel Levite, deputy director-general of Israel's Atomic Energy Commission, spoke about 2011 as the estimated end of the current nuclear age.

So why all this sudden urgency? Perhaps the most important message that underlined the lectures was it doesn't really matter all that much when Iran actually reaches the point when it can arm a Shihab-3 with a nuclear warhead. As Prof. Paul Bracken of Yale University said, "You don't have to detonate a nuclear weapon to use it. North Korea has been using nuclear weapons for year, that's how it's got more foreign aid than any country in Africa."

There's a lot Iran can do without actually firing a nuclear missile, without even having a complete weapon. "We might have a few more years," said Maj.-Gen. Amos Gilad, head of the political-military department at the Defense Ministry, but "there are also psychological events. The Iranian president can announce a major advance and it will have a huge influence over the Middle East.

"For decades, the Arab countries thought we have a nuclear weapon and knew they couldn't beat Israel, so there was no coalition forming against us. The Iranians could create a belief that they can beat us, and under their umbrella create an axis that will destabilize the Middle East."

Dr. Robert Einhorn of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, who set out the various courses of action open to the US and Israel, recommended a much larger investment in antimissile defenses, not only to defend America and its allies from actual attack but also from any use of nuclear blackmail.

To different degrees, all the speakers made it clear that while diplomatic options still have to be used, they are no longer nearly enough. Even Burns, from behind his silk glove of diplomacy, acknowledged that efforts so far had only left Iran emboldened. "It has to learn to respect the power of the international security." he said.

And there don't seem to be too many ways to teach them that respect. The previously fashionable solution of regime change hasn't gone away, but it will take too long. As Bracken said, "It's probably true that globalization will take care of the regime in Iran, but that's not good advice to give a US president, that there will be democracy in Iran by 2300."

Perle didn't mince words. "Iran with nuclear weapons will not be that easily deterred or detained. The threat to destroy a large civilian population in a second-strike is not an easy threat to make, and anyway, by then it's too late. So when will Iran have a nuclear weapon? You can't wait for all the evidence to take a decision."

His solution was clear: "Precision attacks to critically damage the nuclear facilities, efficiently and quickly. B-2 bombers and cruise missiles can carry it out. Israel will have to do it if it's clear that there is a existential threat. Israel must do it and this president will join in. We have to make sure we don't fail, the worst thing would be a failed effort.

"If he is told on his last day in office that this is the point of no return and if you don't [act] you will have been the president to allow Iran to go nuclear, he will give the order."


2. A World Without Israel
by Josef Joffe
January/February 2005

Imagine that Israel never existed. Would the economic malaise and political repression that drive angry young men to become suicide bombers vanish? Would the Palestinians have an independent state? Would the United States, freed of its burdensome ally, suddenly find itself beloved throughout the Muslim world? Wishful thinking. Far from creating tensions, Israel actually contains more antagonisms than it causes.

Since World War II, no state has suffered so cruel a reversal of fortunes as Israel. Admired all the way into the 1970s as the state of "those plucky Jews" who survived against all odds and made democracy and the desert bloom in a climate hostile to both liberty and greenery, Israel has become the target of creeping delegitimization. The denigration comes in two guises. The first, the soft version, blames Israel first and most for whatever ails the Middle East, and for having corrupted U.S. foreign policy. It is the standard fare of editorials around the world, not to mention the sheer venom oozing from the pages of the Arab-Islamic press. The more recent hard version zeroes in on Israel's very existence. According to this dispensation, it is Israel as such, and not its behavior, that lies at the root of troubles in the Middle East. Hence the "statocidal" conclusion that Israel's birth, midwifed by both the United States and the Soviet Union in 1948, was a grievous mistake, grandiose and worthy as it may have been at the time.

The soft version is familiar enough. One motif is the "wagging the dog" theory. Thus, in the United States, the "Jewish lobby" and a cabal of neoconservatives have bamboozled the Bush administration into a mindless pro-Israel policy inimical to the national interest. This view attributes, as has happened so often in history, too much clout to the Jews. And behind this charge lurks a more general one -- that it is somehow antidemocratic for subnational groups to throw themselves into the hurly-burly of politics when it comes to foreign policy. But let us count the ways in which subnational entities battle over the national interest: unions and corporations clamor for tariffs and tax loopholes; nongovernmental organizations agitate for humanitarian intervention; and Cuban Americans keep us from smoking cheroots from the Vuelta Abajo. In previous years, Poles militated in favor of Solidarity, African Americans against Apartheid South Africa, and Latvians against the Soviet Union. In other words, the democratic melee has never stopped at the water's edge.

Another soft version is the "root-cause" theory in its many variations. Because the "obstinate" and "recalcitrant" Israelis are the main culprits, they must be punished and pushed back for the sake of peace. "Put pressure on Israel"; "cut economic and military aid"; "serve them notice that we will not condone their brutalities" -- these have been the boilerplate homilies, indeed the obsessions, of the chattering classes and the foreign-office establishment for decades. Yet, as Sigmund Freud reminded us, obsessions tend to spread. And so there are ever more creative addenda to the well-wrought root-cause theory. Anatol Lieven of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argues that what is happening between Israelis and Palestinians is a "tremendous obstacle to democratization because it inflames all the worst, most regressive aspects of Arab nationalism and Arab culture." In other words, the conflict drives the pathology, and not the other way around -- which is like the streetfighter explaining to the police: "It all started when this guy hit back."

The problem with this root-cause argument is threefold: It blurs, if not reverses, cause and effect. It ignores a myriad of conflicts unrelated to Israel. And it absolves the Arabs of culpability, shifting the blame to you know whom. If one believes former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, the Arab-Islamic quest for weapons of mass destruction, and by extension the war against Iraq, are also Made in Israel. "[A]s long as Israel has nuclear weapons," Ritter opines, "it has chosen to take a path that is inherently confrontational...Now the Arab countries, the Muslim world, is not about to sit back and let this happen, so they will seek their own deterrent. We saw this in Iraq, not only with a nuclear deterrent but also with a biological weapons deterrent...that the Iraqis were developing to offset the Israeli nuclear superiority."

This theory would be engaging if it did not collide with some inconvenient facts. Iraqis didn't use their weapons of mass destruction against the Israeli usurper but against fellow Muslims during the Iran-Iraq War, and against fellow Iraqis in the poison-gas attack against Kurds in Halabja in 1988 -- neither of whom were brandishing any nuclear weapons. As for the Iraqi nuclear program, we now have the "Duelfer Report," based on the debriefing of Iraqi regime loyalists, which concluded: "Iran was the pre-eminent motivator of this policy. All senior-level Iraqi officials considered Iran to be Iraq's principal enemy in the region. The wish to balance Israel and acquire status and influence in the Arab world were also considerations, but secondary."

Now to the hard version. Ever so subtly, a more baleful tone slips into this narrative: Israel is not merely an unruly neighbor but an unwelcome intruder. Still timidly uttered outside the Arab world, this version's proponents in the West bestride the stage as truth-sayers who dare to defy taboo. Thus, the British writer A.N. Wilson declares that he has reluctantly come to the conclusion that Israel, through its own actions, has proven it does not have the right to exist. And, following Sept. 11, 2001, Brazilian scholar Jose Arthur Giannotti said: "Let us agree that the history of the Middle East would be entirely different without the State of Israel, which opened a wound between Islam and the West. Can you get rid of Muslim terrorism without getting rid of this wound which is the source of the frustration of potential terrorists?"

The very idea of a Jewish state is an "anachronism," argues Tony Judt, a professor and director of the Remarque Institute at New York University. It resembles a "late-nineteenth-century separatist project" that has "no place" in this wondrous new world moving toward the teleological perfection of multiethnic and multicultural togetherness bound together by international law. The time has come to "think the unthinkable," hence, to ditch this Jewish state for a binational one, guaranteed, of course, by international force.

So let us assume that Israel is an anachronism and a historical mistake without which the Arab-Islamic world stretching from Algeria to Egypt, from Syria to Pakistan, would be a far happier place, above all because the original sin, the establishment of Israel, never would have been committed. Then let's move from the past to the present, pretending that we could wave a mighty magic wand, and "poof," Israel disappears from the map.

Civilization of Clashes

Let us start the what-if procession in 1948, when Israel was born in war. Would stillbirth have nipped the Palestinian problem in the bud? Not quite. Egypt, Transjordan (now Jordan), Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon marched on Haifa and Tel Aviv not to liberate Palestine, but to grab it. The invasion was a textbook competitive power play by neighboring states intent on acquiring territory for themselves. If they had been victorious, a Palestinian state would not have emerged, and there still would have been plenty of refugees. (Recall that half the population of Kuwait fled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's "liberation" of that country in 1990.) Indeed, assuming that Palestinian nationalism had awakened when it did in the late 1960s and 1970s, the Palestinians might now be dispatching suicide bombers to Egypt, Syria, and elsewhere.

Let us imagine Israel had disappeared in 1967, instead of occupying the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which were held, respectively, by Jordan's King Hussein and Egypt's President Gamal Abdel Nasser. Would they have relinquished their possessions to Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat and thrown in Haifa and Tel Aviv for good measure? Not likely. The two potentates, enemies in all but name, were united only by their common hatred and fear of Arafat, the founder of Fatah (the Palestine National Liberation Movement) and rightly suspected of plotting against Arab regimes. In short, the "root cause" of Palestinian statelessness would have persisted, even in Israel's absence.

Let us finally assume, through a thought experiment, that Israel goes "poof" today. How would this development affect the political pathologies of the Middle East? Only those who think the Palestinian issue is at the core of the Middle East conflict would lightly predict a happy career for this most dysfunctional region once Israel vanishes. For there is no such thing as "the" conflict. A quick count reveals five ways in which the region's fortunes would remain stunted -- or worse:

States vs. States: Israel's elimination from the regional balance would hardly bolster intra-Arab amity. The retraction of the colonial powers, Britain and France, in the mid-20th century left behind a bunch of young Arab states seeking to redraw the map of the region. From the very beginning, Syria laid claim to Lebanon. In 1970, only the Israeli military deterred Damascus from invading Jordan under the pretext of supporting a Palestinian uprising. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Nasser's Egypt proclaimed itself the avatar of pan-Arabism, intervening in Yemen during the 1960s. Nasser's successor, President Anwar Sadat, was embroiled in on-and-off clashes with Libya throughout the late 1970s. Syria marched into Lebanon in 1976 and then effectively annexed the country 15 years later, and Iraq launched two wars against fellow Muslim states: Iran in 1980, Kuwait in 1990. The war against Iran was the longest conventional war of the 20th century. None of these conflicts is related to the Israeli-Palestinian one. Indeed, Israel's disappearance would only liberate military assets for use in such internal rivalries.

Believers vs. Believers: Those who think that the Middle East conflict is a "Muslim-Jewish thing" had better take a closer look at the score card: 14 years of sectarian bloodshed in Lebanon; Saddam's campaign of extinction against the Shia in the aftermath of the first Gulf War; Syria's massacre of 20,000 people in the Muslim Brotherhood stronghold of Hama in 1982; and terrorist violence against Egyptian Christians in the 1990s. Add to this tally intraconfessional oppression, such as in Saudi Arabia, where the fundamentalist Wahhabi sect wields the truncheon of state power to inflict its dour lifestyle on the less devout.

Ideologies vs. Ideologies: Zionism is not the only "ism" in the region, which is rife with competing ideologies. Even though the Baathist parties in Syria and Iraq sprang from the same fascist European roots, both have vied for precedence in the Middle East. Nasser wielded pan-Arabism-cum-socialism against the Arab nation-state. And both Baathists and Nasserites have opposed the monarchies, such as in Jordan. Khomeinist Iran and Wahhabite Saudi Arabia remain mortal enemies. What is the connection to the Arab-Israeli conflict? Nil, with the exception of Hamas, a terror army of the faithful once supported by Israel as a rival to the Palestine Liberation Organization and now responsible for many suicide bombings in Israel. But will Hamas disband once Israel is gone? Hardly. Hamas has bigger ambitions than eliminating the "Zionist entity." The organization seeks nothing less than a unified Arab state under a regime of God.

Reactionary Utopia vs. Modernity: A common enmity toward Israel is the only thing that prevents Arab modernizers and traditionalists from tearing their societies apart. Fundamentalists vie against secularists and reformist Muslims for the fusion of mosque and state under the green flag of the Prophet. And a barely concealed class struggle pits a minuscule bourgeoisie and millions of unemployed young men against the power structure, usually a form of statist cronyism that controls the means of production. Far from creating tensions, Israel actually contains the antagonisms in the world around it.

Regimes vs. Peoples: The existence of Israel cannot explain the breadth and depth of the Mukhabarat states (secret police states) throughout the Middle East. With the exceptions of Jordan, Morocco, and the Gulf sheikdoms, which gingerly practice an enlightened monarchism, all Arab countries (plus Iran and Pakistan) are but variations of despotism -- from the dynastic dictatorship of Syria to the authoritarianism of Egypt. Intranational strife in Algeria has killed nearly 100,000, with no letup in sight. Saddam's victims are said to number 300,000. After the Khomeinists took power in 1979, Iran was embroiled not only in the Iran-Iraq War but also in barely contained civil unrest into the 1980s. Pakistan is an explosion waiting to happen. Ruthless suppression is the price of stability in this region.

Again, it would take a florid imagination to surmise that factoring Israel out of the Middle East equation would produce liberal democracy in the region. It might be plausible to argue that the dialectic of enmity somehow favors dictatorship in "frontline states" such as Egypt and Syria -- governments that invoke the proximity of the "Zionist threat" as a pretext to suppress dissent. But how then to explain the mayhem in faraway Algeria, the bizarre cult-of-personality regime in Libya, the pious kleptocracy of Saudi Arabia, the clerical despotism of Iran, or democracy's enduring failure to take root in Pakistan? Did Israel somehow cause the various putsches that produced the republic of fear in Iraq? If Jordan, the state sharing the longest border with Israel, can experiment with constitutional monarchy, why not Syria?

It won't do to lay the democracy and development deficits of the Arab world on the doorstep of the Jewish state. Israel is a pretext, not a cause, and therefore its dispatch will not heal the self-inflicted wounds of the Arab-Islamic world. Nor will the mild version of "statocide," a binational state, do the trick -- not in view of the "civilization of clashes" (to borrow a term from British historian Niall Ferguson) that is the hallmark of Arab political culture. The mortal struggle between Israelis and Palestinians would simply shift from the outside to the inside.

My Enemy, Myself

Can anybody proclaim in good conscience that these dysfunctionalities of the Arab world would vanish along with Israel? Two U.N. "Arab Human Development Reports," written by Arab authors, say no. The calamities are homemade. Stagnation and hopelessness have three root causes. The first is lack of freedom. The United Nations cites the persistence of absolute autocracies, bogus elections, judiciaries beholden to executives, and constraints on civil society. Freedom of expression and association are also sharply limited. The second root cause is lack of knowledge: Sixty-five million adults are illiterate, and some 10 million children have no schooling at all. As such, the Arab world is dropping ever further behind in scientific research and the development of information technology. Third, female participation in political and economic life is the lowest in the world. Economic growth will continue to lag as long as the potential of half the population remains largely untapped.

Will all of this right itself when that Judeo-Western insult to Arab pride finally vanishes? Will the millions of unemployed and bored young men, cannon fodder for the terrorists, vanish as well -- along with one-party rule, corruption, and closed economies? This notion makes sense only if one cherishes single-cause explanations or, worse, harbors a particular animus against the Jewish state and its refusal to behave like Sweden. (Come to think of it, Sweden would not be Sweden either if it lived in the Hobbesian world of the Middle East.)

Finally, the most popular what-if issue of them all: Would the Islamic world hate the United States less if Israel vanished? Like all what-if queries, this one, too, admits only suggestive evidence. To begin, the notion that 5 million Jews are solely responsible for the rage of 1 billion or so Muslims cannot carry the weight assigned to it. Second, Arab-Islamic hatreds of the United States preceded the conquest of the West Bank and Gaza. Recall the loathing left behind by the U.S.-managed coup that restored the shah's rule in Tehran in 1953, or the U.S. intervention in Lebanon in 1958. As soon as Britain and France left the Middle East, the United States became the dominant power and the No. 1 target. Another bit of suggestive evidence is that the fiercest (unofficial) anti-Americanism emanates from Washington's self-styled allies in the Arab Middle East, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Is this situation because of Israel -- or because it is so convenient for these regimes to "busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels" (as Shakespeare's Henry IV put it) to distract their populations from their dependence on the "Great Satan"?

Take the Cairo Declaration against "U.S. hegemony," endorsed by 400 delegates from across the Middle East and the West in December 2002. The lengthy indictment mentions Palestine only peripherally. The central condemnation, uttered in profuse variation, targets the United States for monopolizing power "within the framework of capitalist globalization," for reinstating "colonialism," and for blocking the "emergence of forces that would shift the balance of power toward multi-polarity." In short, Global America is responsible for all the afflictions of the Arab world, with Israel coming in a distant second.

This familiar tale has an ironic twist: One of the key signers is Nader Fergany, lead author of the 2002 U.N. Arab Human Development Report. So even those who confess to the internal failures of the Arab world end up blaming "the Other." Given the enormity of the indictment, ditching Israel will not absolve the United States. Iran's Khomeinists have it right, so to speak, when they denounce America as the "Great Satan" and Israel only as the "Little Satan," a handmaiden of U.S. power. What really riles America-haters in the Middle East is Washington's intrusion into their affairs, be it for reasons of oil, terrorism, or weapons of mass destruction. This fact is why Osama bin Laden, having attached himself to the Palestinian cause only as an afterthought, calls the Americans the new crusaders, and the Jews their imperialist stand-ins.

None of this is to argue in favor of Israel's continued occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, nor to excuse the cruel hardship it imposes on the Palestinians, which is pernicious, even for Israel's own soul. But as this analysis suggests, the real source of Arab angst is the West as a palpable symbol of misery and an irresistible target of what noted Middle East scholar Fouad Ajami has called "Arab rage." The puzzle is why so many Westerners, like those who signed the Cairo Declaration, believe otherwise.

Is this anti-Semitism, as so many Jews are quick to suspect? No, but denying Israel's legitimacy bears an uncanny resemblance to some central features of this darkest of creeds. Accordingly, the Jews are omnipotent, ubiquitous, and thus responsible for the evils of the world. Today, Israel finds itself in an analogous position, either as handmaiden or manipulator of U.S. might. The soft version sighs: "If only Israel were more reasonable..." The semihard version demands that "the United States pull the rug out from under Israel" to impose the pliancy that comes from impotence. And the hard-hard version dreams about salvation springing from Israel's disappearance. Why, sure -- if it weren't for that old joke from Israel's War of Independence: While the bullets were whistling overhead and the two Jews in their foxhole were running out of rounds, one griped, "If the Brits had to give us a country not their own, why couldn't they have given us Switzerland?" Alas, Israel is just a strip of land in the world's most noxious neighborhood, and the cleanup hasn't even begun.

Josef Joffe is the publisher of Die Zeit, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, and distinguished fellow at the Institute for International Studies, both at Stanford University.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

BIRDS OF A FEATHER: RICHARD NIXON, PAT BUCHANAN, DAVID DUKE AND JIMMY CARTER
Posted by Neal Sher, January 23, 2007.

Please note that this email reveals disturbing information I received from the first Executive Director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council. It seems that President Carter, in Nixonesque fashion, was engaged in "Jew counting."

The more we learn about Jimmy Carter's one-sided and biased views towards Israel and her supporters in this country, the more reason we have to be deeply troubled by what he represents and the dangerous mischief he continues to foment.

There is not enough space to repeat the detailed and well documented critiques of his best selling book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. They are, however, aptly summarized by Dr. Kenneth Stein, one of the many former aides and colleagues publicly to have disassociated themselves from the former president, who charged that: "[the book] is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments."

One of the book's most egregious -- and now infamous passages -- is found at page 213, where Carter advises "the general Arab community and all significant Palestinian groups" to make clear that "suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism" will end once when Israel accepts the ultimate goals of the "Roadmap." Thus the former president sanctions -- indeed encourages -- continued suicide bombings until Israel meets Arab demands. In fact, what seems to trouble him most about such Arab acts is not that they kill innocent Israeli civilians, but that they may damage sympathy for the Palestinian cause.

Despite the in depth criticism of his thesis, Carter has dug in, stubbornly insisting that his book is both "accurate and needed," blaming the firestorm he has triggered on Jewish American organizations and while he accuses the pro-Israel community of trying to stifle him or any debate on Middle East policy.

And, let's not ignore his interview on the Al Jazeera network during which he astonishingly proclaimed that Palestinian missile attacks against Israeli citizens do not, to his way of thinking, constitute acts of terror. Even his apparent condemnation of the killing of children and bombing buses is problematic, as it is couched in terms of damaging sympathy for the Palestinian cause. This approach is reminiscent of that employed by Arafat who, to the extent he ever was in any way critical of acts of terror, complained only because he thought it was tactically disadvantageous.

Not surprisingly and very tellingly, Carter's frontal attacks have been warmly embraced by a nasty cast of scoundrels, including white supremacists groups and websites such as Stormfront and Aryan Nations as well as David Duke and the notorious Holocaust denying Institute of Historical Review.

It is with good reason that Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi, John Conyers and Howard Dean have publicly distanced themselves from Mr. Carter, a lead which hopefully others will follow No Democratic leader or official has come to Carter's defense, and partisan attempts to use his comments to smear all Democrats as anti-Israel and anti-Semitic should not be tolerated.

The ongoing controversy, including the Carter Center's acceptance of millions of dollars from anti-Israel Arab sources, including the Saudi royal family, and the Bin Laden family prompted me last month to reveal to the JTA a disturbing 1987 encounter I had with Mr. Carter, while I was the Director of the Office of Special Investigations in the Justice Department, as he took up the cause of the family of an admitted Nazi SS concentration camp who had been stripped of citizenship by a federal court and removed from the country. See:
www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=17423&intcategoryid

If one didn't know better, you'd think that we were not talking about a former president, but rather Pat Buchanan. After all, it was Mr. Buchanan, was it not, who over the years: denigrated Israel by calling it, among other things, an albatross around this country's neck, as he blamed her for the wars in Iraq; demeaned the pro-Israel lobby for having turned Capitol Hill into what he calls "Israeli occupied territory"; and came to the aid of Nazi criminals being pursued by our government, even while serving as communications director in the Reagan White House.

As troubling as all of this is, there is more. I have received correspondence which ineluctably leads to the comparison of Jimmy Carter to the darkest side of Richard Nixon.

In response to my earlier Op Ed, on December 27 of last year [see below] I received an email from Professor Monroe Freedman, a distinguished member of the faculty of Hofstra Law School in New York. He had been the first executive director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, which had been created during the Carter administration. Working closely with Elie Wiesel, Freedman put forward to the White House a list of Council members. The recommendations came back disapproved, and Freedman remembers well the reason: "In the top corner, in Carter's handwriting and with his initials was the notation: 'Too many Jews'"

It certainly looks like Mr. Carter took a page right out of the playbook of the disgraced Nixon, who, in a most paranoid and bigoted of moments, instructed an aide to count the Jews in the Labor Department where he believed his economic policies were being obstructed.

To all those who doubt that Jews are an extraordinary people or that Israel is an extraordinary nation, I ask: who else could bring together and find common cause between the likes of Richard Nixon, Pat Buchanan David Duke and Jimmy Carter? Enough said.

Neal Sher, a New York attorney, previously served as the Director of the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations and is the former Executive Director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. He can be reached at nsher@erols.com.

Editor's Note: The cartoon is by Cox and Forkun and is taken from the Gathering Storm Blog
(http://the-gathering-storm.blogspot.com/).

To Go To Top

RUMINATIONS ON THE DESTINY OF THE PEOPLE
Posted by Reuven Kossover, January 23, 2007.

This was written by Reuven who lives in Ma'aleh Levona. His website is called BlogCritics.org and this article is archived at
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/19/070649.php He was born in Brooklyn and lived in Minnesota for a number of years. There he managed restaurants and wrote stories. He moved with his family to Israel where they now reside. He is also published by the Root & Branch Information Service and by Jewish Indianapolis

Writing on this subject is very tricky. "Destiny" implies something far more than a mere political analysis. The truth is, the more I think about it, it is the destiny of the people of Israel that I am meant to pay attention to.

But before I go further, I need to set down some definitions, so that you, the reader, know exactly what I'm talking about. Otherwise the semantic confusion can prevent you from understanding either the meaning or the import of this article. In addition, I would like to express my thanks to Rabbi Yehoshua Friedman for fine-tuning certain points of Jewish law.

So, here we go.

I. Defining the terms

1. Zionist movement: a largely secular movement to bring Jews home to the Land of Israel.

2. State of Israel: the political expression of the Zionist movement.

3. Children of Israel: the descendants of Jacob (Israel), son of Isaac, son of Abraham, son of TeraH, a high priest in Sumer, in the city of Ur, who left for the city of Paran when the king he served died. After a period of time, Abraham, commanded by G-d, continued westwards to the Land of Canaan.

4. People of Israel (Hebrews): the descendants of the sons of Israel, who were divided into a number of tribes.

5. Land of Israel: territory designated by the Torah [BaMidbár/Numbers 34:1-15] or the Tana"kh [Ezekiel 47:3-23, 48:1-35] as the territory that G-d has given the People of Israel.

6. Kingdom of Israel: This has three definitions.

a) the Kingdom of Sha'úl (Saul), David, and Shlómo (Solomon) which extended as far as the Euphrates River at the height of its power;

b) the secessionist kingdom of ten tribes that separated from the tribes of Yehudá (Judah) and Shim'ón after the death of Shlómo (Solomon) and accession to the throne of his son ReHavám. With time, this kingdom weakened and the territory of the tribe of Benyamín became part of the southern kingdom of Yehudá (Judah);

c) in messianic times, the Kingdom of Israel will be the entity that succeeds the State of Israel and any other entity that rules here.

7. Jews: Originally, the descendants (tribe) of Yehudá, one of the sons of Israel. With time, the tribe of Shim'on merged into the tribe of Yehudá, and with time, the tribe of Benyamín merged as well [Scroll of Esther 2: 5-6]. At the time of its fall, the Kingdom of Yehudá represented the tribes of Yehudá, Shim'on, Benyamin and those people of the tribe of Leví who lived within the borders of the kingdom. The descendants of these people are the Jews mentioned in definition #1.

a) According to Halakhá (normative Jewish law), a Jew is the child of a Jewish mother, or a convert to the religion who accepts the entire corpus of 613 commandments of the Torah. If male, the convert needs to be circumcised. All converts are required to immerse in flowing water or a mikvá (ritual bath). According to the rules of the Rabbinate, the official Jewish religious body in Israel, the forgoing definition is the only definition of who is a Jew.

b) According to the ministries of interior and of absorption of the State of Israel, the forgoing definition is the primary definition of who is a Jew. But these ministries will accept other individuals who have Jewish grandparents as Jews. It should be noted that the Israel High Court of Justice has ruled that non-normative (i.e. non-"Orthodox") conversions from overseas will be accepted as well. But at the same time, the ministry of the interior has refused to accept some converts, even "Orthodox" ones, for automatic citizenship, requiring a rather arbitrary waiting period and naturalization process.

8. Israeli: This has two definitions.

a) one who lives within the State of Israel, or who has Israeli citizenship and who is subject to its jurisdiction;

b) an artificial cultural construct, a creation of the Zionist movement, an attempt to create a new Jew, one uninfluenced by the rabbis and the decadent Jewish culture of Eastern Europe.

9. Palestine: This has three definitions.

a) The territory of the Land of Israel under the name given it by the Romans in 100 CE or so, Syria Palestina. This name was given the territory to insult the Jewish (Judean) inhabitants of the country, as the name Palestine recalls the name Philistine, an Aegean people that fled to this country, settling in the vicinity of what are now the cities of Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon and Gath, and who were traditional enemies and persecutors of the Children of Israel;

b) the territory covering both sides of the Jordan River granted to the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland by the League of Nations as a "Mandate", with the stated purpose of creating within it a "Jewish national homeland." The British separated most of this territory from its direct rule and administered it as the Emirate of Transjordan with the son of Feisal, Sherif of Mecca and Medina, Abdallah, as Emir. Under international law, the Palestine Mandate was the successor state to the Ottoman Empire where it had jurisdiction. The successor states to the Palestine Mandate are the State of Israel and the Kingdom of Jordan;

c) the political construct of Arab terrorist organizations who wish to end the State of Israel, and to end the Jewish presence in this region.

10. Palestinian: This has two definitions.

a) A resident of the territory of Mandate Palestine, an individual under its legal jurisdiction. It should be noted here that for the entire period of British rule, the Arabs resident in Mandate Palestine did not self identify as "Palestinians," but as members of the Arab "Umma;"

b) an artificial cultural construct of the terrorist movements representing the Arab refugees who left the Palestine Mandate during the war that broke out in 1947-49. A great deal of "academic" work was done by the Husseini family to construct a history for this non-existent nationality. Additional work was done by discredited scholars such as Edward Saďd, who was shown by Justus Weiner to have lied about basic facts about his own life. Only after the founding of the Palestine Liberation organization, did the Arabs claim to be "Palestinian."

Now to clarify my own biases.

I am a Jew. I am a citizen of the State of Israel, and therefore an Israeli under definition 8a above. But when I express my own opinions, I am not talking as an Israeli, under the artificial construct of 8b above. I speak as a Jew, and as a member of one of the tribes of Israel.

As for me, I believe that the State of Israel is collapsing of its own corruption and lack of purpose, as it has already served its purpose. But it will be replaced, not by a "Palestine," but by a Jewish entity far different from what we have seen, and one that is able to cope with the coming reunification of Yehudá (the Jews) with the brother tribes that appeared lost to history. Nothing is lost under the sight of G-d. I refer you all to the Book of Ezekiel [Ezekiel 36:6-38, 37:1-28].

There is one further thing I must make absolutely clear here. In writing this, I'm not dealing with the "Arab-Israeli crisis," the "Middle East crisis" or any other of the cataracts that stand in the way of free flow of thought, ideas, people, and commerce in this part of the world. I'm not writing about peace, I'm not writing about war. I'm not writing about making peace or making war. Those issues are not for this article. I'm writing solely about the destiny of my people, the People of Israel.

II. Where do I come in?

I believed, when I pressured my wife to move to this country, that the reason for the move was to protect my children from the corrosive influence of American culture, and to prevent them from assimilating into it, marrying non-Jews, and likely losing their Jewish heritage in the process. So, I listened very carefully when a thirty-year-old Israeli, the fellow on the other side of the counter of Pizza Maestro, which used to serve excellent pizza in the East Talpiot neighborhood of Jerusalem, explained to me that my sons would assimilate into Israeli culture. I had already figured out that what passed for Israeli culture was a very pale imitation of the corrosive culture I had thought I had left behind in America.

After having a good think, I turned on the laptop we had brought with us to the absorption center and started re-reading the essays that Barry Chamish wrote about the political establishment in Israel. I started re-reading the nightmare complaints of other recent and not so recent immigrants to this country. I started to compare my own experiences to the ones I read about, and carefully compare what I really wanted to do with what I was doing as a new immigrant.

I realized that I had been duped. My goal -- getting away from American culture and assimilation into it ad been a mere carrot. There was something further behind this immediate goal that I did not really understand -- something that has only become clear in the last couple of weeks.

Did G-d come to me in the fireplace, like one of those wizards in the Harry Potter books, to tell me my destiny and that I had been duped? No. We don't have a fireplace, to start with. We have a small (too small) electric heater to keep our house warm. And G-d didn't show up in the heater either, as an Entity that didn't become consumed.

This was a slow realization, one that has come to me with the people that I "chanced" to meet, and in the events that have "chanced" to occur in my life.

For example, was it chance that an agnostic who identified himself culturally as a Jew but who did not really observe any of its laws, met a woman who knew nothing about Judaism, but who knew more about faith in G-d than a deck of theologians? Was it chance that I, the agnostic who challenged even the purpose of his bar mitzvah from the bimá in the synagogue (after doing a workmanlike job of chanting the verses required of me) was now forced to teach this woman the Judaism he had run away from? Was it chance that I had always talked about the perfect number of children being four, (and hoping in his heart that he would have four boys) that I fathered four sons -- one aborted by the mother, one who died after sixteen weeks in the womb, and two that lived?

Was it chance that after applying my wife's basic formula of "G-d will provide" after walking out of a night auditor's job in disgust with absolutely no idea of where the next paycheck would come from found, by "chance", that he could return to the management job he had left at Burger King four years earlier? Was it chance that we were able to buy a house in Saint Paul in 1993, at the lowest interest rate in forty years, and realize a gain of over 100% in its sale eight years later in one of the hottest real estate markets our neighborhood had seen in decades? Was it chance that the commander of my volunteer police unit insisted that I be assigned to Tuesday night duty instead of the Friday morning assignment I preferred? Was it chance that I met Aryeh Gallin on the first night I was doing patrol, and discovered how much we had in common in our outlooks in political affairs?

Was it chance that after meeting Aryeh Gallin and becoming associated with the Root & Branch Association that he runs, I was able to meet people like Barry Chamish, Dr. Gerald Schroeder, Vendyl Jones, Dr. Paul Eidelberg, Moshe Feiglin, and a whole slew of other people who represent the bubbling pot of intellectual ideas in Jerusalem and the rest of the country?

Was this all chance?

No. I don't think so. I don't really believe in chance. I used to. Now, I don't. Not anymore. In my life, I have been pushed, indirectly sometimes, sometimes in a most rude way, to understand that G-d runs the universe and that my survival depends on trust in that G-d.

There are no links to check all this out. My life is not a URL on the Internet. But now, based on all this, when I see works that doubt that "mere chance" is the ruling force of the universe, I'm not too hard to convince.

III. A glimpse of the future

In early December, Aryeh Gallin sent me e-mails about a post-doctoral student from India. There is nothing special about that. Israel has world class universities, like the Technion in Haifa and the Weitzmann Institute near Rishon l' Tzion, and India sends thousands of young men and women to study science here. But Dr. Aafreedi, the young man whom Aryeh wanted to invite to speak at the Israel Center in a Root & Branch presentation, is not a scientist. He is a historian. In addition, he was studying Jewish history with the intent of linking it to the history of his own people, the Pakhtun who live in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India, to our own.

The Pakhtun claim to be descendants of the tribes that were expelled from our country when the Assyrians conquered the northern Kingdom of Israel (see definition 6b) 2,700 years ago. They are not clear which particular tribe, but a Jewish woman I chanced to meet on the bus a couple of days ago said that the Pakhtun are descendants of the tribe of Ephraim. Dr. Aafreedi apparently believes the same thing, particularly about the "khel" or "tribe" of Afridi, his own. Jewish history, and the history of the People of Israel generally, appears fraught with delicious ironies and the Child of Israel who lacks a sense of humor lacks sense altogether.

A large number of the Pakhtun comprise the Taliban.

Dr. Aafreedi spoke on 20 December 2006, but due to changes in the Egged bus routing, I was unable to get to town to be master of ceremonies that night. I only got to meet Dr. Aafreedi in Jerusalem last Thursday (11 January). Put simply, he is the best news our people have seen in 2,700 years, since the Assyrians destroyed the northern Kingdom of Israel. He is a fellow Israelite. He is one of over 40 million fellow Israelites, including, yes including, the Taliban. G-d indeed, has a sense of humor, a sense of humor sharper than the sharpest of needles.

It's enough to make a guy laugh till the tears come out of his eyes in pain, and cry until the tears come out of his eyes in joy.

For over two millennia, Jews have more or less considered themselves the only remaining Children of Israel, figuring that the other tribes had been lost to history. We have taken a term from the Bible, "shearít" -- remnant -- and applied it to ourselves. Thus, you see the name of many synagogues in the Western world -- "Shearít Yisraél" -- Remnant of Israel. Apparently, this may be a misperception.

In addition to all the forced converts away from the religion who are now coming back to the faith, like the descendants of the Spanish and Portuguese "anusim," we Jews now have to come to grips with the fact that we are only a small portion of a larger people. According to Rabbi Dr.Yehuda Bohrer, one group of Israelites from the general area of Bokhara claim to be descended from the tribe of Reuvén. They never lost their laws or traditions and have retained the links with Jews and are now considered as Jews.

Unlike the members of the tribe of Reuvén, the Pakhtun appear to have lost much of the ties to our people. Nevertheless, they have been claiming to be Children of Israel for over a thousand years; they claim that the original king Afghana, the first king of the royal line of Afghanistan, was a descendant of Sha'úl, of the tribe of Benyamín. Jewish merchants who lived in Kabul always could travel without fear to the Pakhtun lands, where they were recognized by the Pakhtuns as fellow Children of Israel. Today, the Pakhtun, who live in places that have media hostile to the State of Israel, like India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, look upon us Jews as brothers from the wrong side of the tracks. If there is the possibility that Dr. Aafreedi can prove the claims of his people using methods that go beyond mere references in Persian or Jewish writings, then we Jews have the interesting task of "recognizing Joseph" (Ephraim was a son of Joseph). And the Pakhtun are going to have to get to know their brothers, the Jews.

Oy vey!

[Editor's Note: See also the article called "Indians With Biblical Roots" by Dr. Navras Jaat Aafreedi in this issue of Think-Israel. Click here.]

Contact Reuven Kossover at the Root and Branch Association (rb@rb.org.il).

To Go To Top

YESHA COUNCIL SLAMS PEACE NOW'S "LIES NOW" REPORT
Posted by Hillel Fendel, January 23, 2007.

The Yesha Council highlights the deceptions in a recent study by the ultra-left wing Peace Now group purporting to show that 40% of Yesha communities are built on private Arab land.

"The so-called facts in the Peace Now report are from the true reality," the Yesha Council says.

The Yesha Council has named its report, currently underway, "The Protocols of Peace Now -- the Great Deception." It includes maps, documents, quotations -- and an itemized list of "simple, ridiculous mistakes, as well as the lack of sincerity, that typify the criminal negligence that characterizes this hate-motivated report."

Praised by Arabs

The Peace Now report received lavished praise from Palestinian Authority Arabs. The PA news agency Ma'an recently wrote that it "shows part of the true face of the Hebrew State... It shows that private Arab-owned lands were simply stolen by the Hebrew state to build settlements -- disproving the claim of four decades... The report was not publicized by me or by a Palestinian organization, but by an Israeli organization -- and Israel cannot deny it... Where are all the Israeli mottos about justice, democracy and civil rights?... This is now a 'ready-to-go' case for the International Court... Now that Peace Now has given this gift to the land-owners, we must thank this organization, and see what the land-owners and the PA will do; for this is much to do..."

"The Peace Now members are running around the world with this report," a Yesha Council source said, "in order to malign the State of Israel - but it is filled with distorted data and lies. All is apparently fair and acceptable in their war against the Jewish communities."

Peace Now members are currently lobbying U.S. Congressmen against Israel based on their report. Nationalist camp activists say that Peace Now's objective is to make the approval of U.S. aid to Israel contingent upon the withdrawal of Israeli financial support for all Yesha communities allegedly on private Arab land, as well as the destruction of all hilltop outposts.

No State-Owned Lands in Yesha?

The point of departure of the Peace Now report, the Yesha Council says, is that "all of Judea and Samaria is private Arab-owned land unless proven otherwise." The entire concept of state-owned lands essentially does not exist for Peace Now, says Council leader Pinchas Wallerstein.

Only a small percentage of Judea and Samaria is actually privately-owned, however. A legal expert familiar with the area told Arutz-7 that "perhaps 5%" of the uninhabited land there is privately-owned. "Vast areas in Judea and Samaria lay totally desolate in 1967 when Israel liberated them in the Six Day War," he said. Most of these areas were then designated as state-owned, in the absence of other documentation.

For instance, most of Maaleh Adumim -- one of the largest cities in Judea and Samaria, just east of Jerusalem -- appears on the Peace Now report as if built on private land, when in fact it was built on state-owned lands.

The Yesha report also shows that Peace Now falsely "expanded" the borders of Jewish communities into Arab-owned land. "Additional area around the communities was simply added to the Jewish towns," a Yesha source said, "as if to prove that the Jews had stolen the land -- when in fact the communities don't claim these areas at all."

Peace Now even ignores a ruling by former Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak, Wallerstein states. Barak ruled in the past that the community of Etz Ephraim, near Elkanah, is built on Jewish-owned land -- yet Peace Now has it on Arab land.

Neither does Peace Now recognize the sale of land, apparently. The Modiin-area community of Kfar Oranim, for instance, whose land was duly purchased from Arabs, appears in the Peace Now report as "mostly Arab-owned."

The Essential Goal: An End to Jewish Presence in Judea and Samaria

Peace Now's activities center largely on making life difficult, if not impossible, for Jews living in Judea and Samaria. One of its major campaigns in recent months has been waged against the construction of 33 high-rise buildings in a section of Modi'in Illit, some of which were built on land belonging to the nearby Arab village of Bil'in. A Peace Now spokesperson speaking with Arutz-7 at the time did not rule out the possibility that it would seek a court order to demolish the buildings -- though Jewish families had already purchased and moved into many of the apartments.

This past December, the nearly 200 people of Migron, south of Beit El, learned that Defense Minister Peretz plans to forcibly expel them in several months if no "voluntary evacuation" agreement is reached. Though some of the land on which Migron was founded is officially listed as Arab-owned, these Arabs had never come forward to make their claim, nor had they ever cultivated or laid any claim to it -- until Peace Now sought them out and encouraged them to do so.

Peace Now has also targeted new construction in Maaleh Adumim, Maaleh Rechavam, a neighborhood in Eli, and many more locations, and has demanded the destruction of some 120 hilltop outposts throughout Judea and Samaria. It frequently files suit in the Supreme Court against what it feels is the government's slow pace in demolishing areas of Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria.

Last month, a petition by Peace Now has prompted Attorney General Mazuz to open a limited criminal investigation against government officials who arranged funding for Yesha outposts.

MK Uri Ariel said that the "deceptive Peace Now report is another attempt to foster conflict and ignite a war... Peace Now does not promote peace amongst the Jews, nor between us and the Arabs." Yaakov (Ketzaleh) Katz of Beit El, a veteran leader of the settlement enterprise in Judea and Samaria, said about Peace Now's latest report, "They merely want to weaken us and the State of Israel." Gush Etzion settlement leader Nadia Matar has said that "members of Peace Now are spying and informing on behalf of the Arab enemy."

International Funding

Notably, Peace Now's costly expenses in detailing every new Israeli structure in Judea and Samaria are largely funded by foreign governments. Investigative reporter David Bedein says the organization is or has been effectively on the payroll of at least three European governments -- Britain, Norway, and Finland -- and has also been funded by the Economic Cooperation Foundation, a group funded directly by the European Union.

Britain and Norway are fundamentally opposed to the existence of Israeli communities in Yesha, thus that the money they give Peace Now invariably serves those governments' foreign policy interests. Despite this, the organization is not required under Israeli law to register as a foreign agent. In contrast, Bedein explained, if the organization were operating in the United States, it would have to register as a foreign agent with the U.S. Justice Department.

Bedein said Peace Now "was in effect spying on Israel for foreign governments," and engages in surveillance activities relating not only to Israeli communities, but also on military installations belonging to the IDF.

Outposts Have a Purpose

The Yesha Council report opens with a strong criticism of the type of work Peace Now does:

"The very decision to evacuate outposts, to the cheers of the Palestinians, as if we were disciplining third-graders along the style of, 'Get out, stand in the corner, show us your papers and then return,' without checking seriously even one time what the real objective of these outposts is and how they will contribute to less friction and a better atmosphere -- for this alone the Knesset should vote no-confidence in the government." These words were uttered in the Knesset by then-MK Ariel Sharon on October 18, 1999.

Sharon explained at the time that one of the justifications for the outposts is to guarantee Israeli access to various routes in the area. "For instance," he said, " Elon Moreh, Itamar and the Shilo bloc must be connected to the Alon route in the Jordan Valley to their east. If we don't sit on important points along these routes, who will defend them?"

Hillel Fendel is senior editor at Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com).

To Go To Top

FATAH STRATEGY; PALESTINIAN ANARCHY
Posted by Barry Rubin, January 23, 2007.

What's the biggest threat in the Middle East today? Answer: Iran, both directly and indirectly. Directly because of its expansion of influence in Iraq and drive for nuclear weapons; indirectly because of its sponsorship of radical groups and the most extremist Arab state, Syria.

And who gave us Islamist Iran, inasmuch as any foreign factor could have done so. Answer: Jimmy Carter, through his incompetence at dealing with the Iranian revolution and its aftermath, plus his weakness in managing the state-sanctioned kidnapping of several dozen American diplomats. If George Bush created post-Saddam Iraq, Carter helped produce the monstrosity in Tehran. So now, this latter failed president is trying to distract attention from his own responsibility, without ever a word on the world's only openly genocidal state, and of course insisting that Israel is the only problem in the region.

This type of misdirection is always a welcome tool in the arsenal of otherwise no good leaders. Which brings us to Mahmoud Abbas. A good way to examine the situation in Palestinian politics is to consider his most important recent statement, to the January 11 Fatah rally marking that group's 42nd anniversary. It is worth noting that in fact Fatah is 47 years old. Why the five-year difference? Because Fatah dates its origin from the first terror attack on Israel, not its political origin, showing its continuing identification with violence.

Abbas began his speech with a quote from the Koran, something Yasir Arafat used to do but not seen previously from Abbas or other Fatah leaders. Clearly, this is an attempt to appear more Islamic to appeal to Hamas and its constituency. Needless to say, it won't work.

The point of the quote was that divisions are disastrous, which seems obvious enough, but here there is a fatal flaw. The real issue for the Palestinian political scene is not unity, but who is leading. Fatah is not willing to have unity at the expense of being the junior partner of Hamas. This is not just the normal desire to be in power. Fatah leaders are psychologically incapable of accepting the fact that they are only number two. That is still another reason why unity is impossible.

Within seconds of his call for unity, the crowd is shouting, "Hamas is Shiite!" Not only do the Fatah people hate Hamas, which after all is killing their cadre and taking the loot away from them, but they are now thinking in the framework of the new Middle East sectarian war. Hamas sides with Shia Iran, which is heresy for Arab nationalists, and with Hizballah, which is very uncomfortable for Sunni Muslims (Hizballah has very bad relations with most Lebanese Sunnis right now). So while Abbas said, "We are all sons of one people," the crowd continued to chant against the Shiites.

Abbas then, as Fatah's credentials, recited a long list of 15 "martyrs," all of them involved deeply in terrorist operations, including the leaders of Black September which carried out many airplane hijackings and murderous attacks. There was no mention of moderate PLO or Fatah officials killed by radical factions. What this shows is that the Palestinian nationalists--like the Islamists--view terrorism as their great achievement in the past, a concept that also locks them into this approach in the present and future. It is easy to take this compilation of glorious achievements for granted, yet it is amazing nonetheless. Is the problem that Abbas cannot or will not do what most politicians would, talk about what Fatah has done for the Palestinians in material terms? The answer is both. After forty-whatever years, the Palestinian national movement has little to show except its survival. And that is part of the problem.

Next comes Abbas' solution: that all factions should unite in turning their guns against Israel, not each other. It is certainly understandable that he say so. Even if he had moderate intentions, this is certainly the easiest and "cleverest" strategy to follow. Yet everyone should understand that by following this path, Abbas underlines the fact that diplomacy and negotiations for peace thus become impossible. Abbas cannot deliver anything because of his weakness, but he also cannot deliver anything because of his strategy. First, to compete with Hamas by showing Fatah is better at armed struggle. Second, he proposes to unite with Hamas by both of them fighting alongside each other.

In doing so, Abbas rejects three other strategies, and so does the overwhelming majority of his organization. One option that isn't considered--and was not used under his predecessor either--is to compete with Hamas by material achievement, that is, by improving his people's lives. A second, which is linked to the first, is to outshine them by making a compromise peace and getting a Palestinian state. Finally, there is the option of waging all-out war on Hamas and winning.

This reality is part of the picture that makes Palestinian unity, moderation, or peace-making out of the question. The anarchy will continue in Gaza and the West Bank partly due to the impossibility of compromise between two sides competing for power and money; partly as a result of the broader regional conflict, in which Fatah and Hamas are on different sides. And for these same reasons, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue to decline in regional importance. As for the Arab-Israeli conflict (as distinct from the Israeli-Islamist or Israeli-Iran conflicts), it exists only in demagogic speeches and the illusions of Westerners who know little about the region.

To Go To Top

'3 NUCLEAR BOMBS ARE SECOND HOLOCAUST'
Posted by Jerusalem Post Staff, January 23, 2007.

This was written by Jerusalem Post Staff.

Three nuclear weapons constitute a second Holocaust. Enemies are explicit in their desire to destroy us. We are sleepwalking through this as if diplomatic engagement will create a fiesta where we will all love one another," Newt Gingrich, Former US Speaker of the House of Representatives, told the Herzliya conference on Tuesday via satellite.

According to Gingrich, "Israel is facing the greatest danger for its survival since the 1967 victory. Israel maintained its dominance since 1967 even after the 1973 failure. In 1984 I wrote that WMD and terrorism would pose a threat for US national security. If two or three cities are destroyed because of terrorism both the US and Israel's democracy will be eroded and both will become greater dictatorial societies."

"We lack the language and goals to address the new environment along with the speed and intensity to counter the contemporary threats. If we have no strategy we will need to be intellectually honest to consider the next step once two cities have been destroyed. My grandchildren are in greater danger than I was throughout the Cold War.

"What stages are you in Israel going to take if tomorrow morning Jerusalem, Haifa and Tel Aviv would be destroyed? Similarly the US needs to consider what policies it would advance if in twenty-four hours, Atlanta, Boston and San Francisco were destroyed. These threats will become even more imminent in two or five years time," he added.

Gingrich believes the US should have as an explicit goal -- regime change in Iran. "In 2006 even the Department of State which seeks to deny the nature of reality, noted that Iran is a leading sponsor of terror. What I need is something that will be similar to Reagan's Replacement strategy in Iran. The current unrest in Iran will facilitate this," he said.

The former House Speaker concluded by calling on the Department of Homeland Security to conduct two nuclear exercises and one biological exercise in major cities such as Philadelphia or Dallas. "This has to be carried out to determine how many causalities would occur and whether hospitals could accommodate the casualties."

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

THE QUESTION OF CARTER'S CASH
Posted by David Haimson, January 23, 2007.
This was written by Claudia Rossett and it appeared in National Review Online
(http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/ ?q=NmVlNzc4OWI5YTc4MDY1MzhiMDM2OWRhNjgzYzk0ZTk=).
Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

THE EX-PRESIDENCY: The Question of Carter's Cash
In which our reporter follows the money

Did Jimmy Carter do it for the money? That's the question making the rounds about Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, an anti-Israeli screed recently written by the ex-president whose Carter Center has accepted millions in Arab funding.

Even in Carter's long history of post-presidential grandstanding, this book sets fresh standards of irresponsibility. Purporting to give a balanced view of the Palestinian -- Israeli conflict, Carter effectively shrugs off such highly germane matters as Palestinian terrorism. The hypocrisies are boundless, and include adoring praise of the deeply oppressive, religiously intolerant Saudi regime side by side with condemnations of democratic Israel. In one section, typical of the book's entire approach, Carter includes a "Historical Chronology," from Biblical times to 2006, in which he dwells on events surrounding his 1978 Camp David Accords but omits the Holocaust. Kenneth W. Stein, the founder of the Carter Center's Middle East program, resigned last month to protest the book, describing it in a letter to Fox News as "replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments." As this article goes to press, more protest resignations, this time from the Carter Center's board of councilors, appear to be in the works.

If there is a silver lining to any of this, it is that Carter's book has drawn much-overdue attention to some of the funding that pours into the Carter Center, whose intriguing donor list includes anti-Israeli tycoons and Middle East states. Founded in 1982 and appended to Carter's presidential library, the center has served for almost a quarter century as the main base and fund-raising magnet for Carter's self-proclaimed mission to save the world.

In recent weeks, a number of articles have noted that Carter's anti-Israeli views coincide with those of some of the center's prime financial backers, including the government of Saudi Arabia and the foundation of Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud, whose offer of $10 million to New York City just after Sept. 11 was rejected by then-mayor Rudy Giuliani because it came wrapped in the suggestion that America rethink its support of Israel. Other big donors listed in the Carter Center's annual reports include the Sultanate of Oman and the sultan himself; the government of the United Arab Emirates; and a brother of Osama bin Laden, Bakr BinLadin, "for the Saudi BinLadin Group." Of lesser heft, but still large, are contributions from assorted development funds of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, as well as of OPEC, whose membership includes oil-rich Arab states, Nigeria (whose government is also a big donor to the Carter Center), and Venezuela (whose anti-American strongman Hugo Chávez benefited in a 2004 election from the highly controversial monitoring efforts of the Carter Center).

A recent editorial in Investor's Business Daily, headlined "Jimmy Carter's Li'l Ol' Stink Tank," listed a number of "founders" of the Carter Center. The names were drawn from the annual reports, and included "the king of Saudi Arabia, BCCI scandal banker Agha Hasan Abedi, and Arafat pal Hasib Sabbagh." And, writing last month in the Washington Times, terror-funding expert Rachel Ehrenfeld described links going back to the 1970s between the Carter family peanut business and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, whose Pakistani founder helped bankroll the Carter Center at least until BCCI went belly-up in 1991, busted as a global criminal enterprise.

Carter and Friends (2001, AFP)

There is, of course, much more to the Carter Center than this list implies. It is large, with assets totaling $377 million (as of 2005), an operating budget of some $46.8 million, a staff of some 150, a 200-member board of councilors, and hundreds of donors, including not only individuals and foundations, but the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. State Department. Some of the center's work is devoted to such laudable causes as wiping out the parasitical guinea worm. Indeed, it is possible to glean from various news items and brief mentions in the center's annual reports that some of the more intriguing donors, such as the sultan of Oman and the OPEC development fund, have been giving money for exactly such causes. According to one notation on the Carter Center website, for example, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia donated $7.6 million in 1993 to help Carter fight the guinea worm.

But notwithstanding such occasional tidbits, it's stunningly hard to discern from the Carter Center's public documents who is giving precisely how much, and for what. Donor names, sometimes listed only as "Anonymous," are lumped under broad categories such as "$100,000 or more" or "$1 million or more." There is no systematic tally of just how much "more" -- no clear way to know, for example, whether Saudi money accounts for only a tad of Carter's funding or a mighty dollop, and whether the Saudi share of total contributions has changed over the years. Neither is there any systematic disclosure of who is funding exactly what activities in the name of "waging peace," "fighting disease," and "building hope" -- the center's self-proclaimed missions. A reporter's e-mail exchange with Carter Center press secretary Deanna Congileo elicits the response that none of the anonymous donors are from the Middle East, but no further details can be released without permission from the donors -- which, even if granted, will take some time to obtain (stay tuned).

All this might be less disturbing had Carter confined his post-presidential efforts to such good works as vanquishing the guinea worm. But for years he has run his own mini-presidency -- complete with a series of attempts to outflank or shape the policies of sitting presidents. These have included -- to name just two examples -- his letter-writing campaign in 1990 to members of the United Nations Security Council, in an effort to thwart the Bush I coalition that fought the first Gulf War against Saddam Hussein; and his 1994 trip to North Korea, where he proposed to the dying tyrant Kim Il Sung a deeply flawed nuclear-freeze deal that may well have helped Kim's son consolidate power and develop ICBMs and atomic bombs.

It could be argued that Carter, whatever his pretensions, is, after all, a private individual running a private foundation, and is therefore under no obligation to disclose full details of the getting and spending of the river of money flowing through his center. (In 2004, the most recent year for which the center's website makes such figures available, donations totaled $146 million.) But in all his waging and fighting and building (and fundraising), Carter has been trading for years on the respect accorded to his former public office. Regardless of whatever room for murk the law allows, full financial disclosure is what sound judgment demands. The Carter Center itself makes much in promotional materials of its efforts to strengthen democracies by "promoting government transparency." Is Carter so rigidly certain of his rectitude that he believes himself exempt from his own preaching?

In a recent Los Angeles Times opinion piece defending his new book (and insinuating that the debate over it is being controlled by pro-Israeli lobbyists), Carter wrote that he is merely seeking a "free and balanced discussion of the facts." It is quite possible that even he may not know for sure whether he has molded his views to suit anti-Israeli donors; whether his center has attracted the money of such donors because they like his views; or whether, while fighting the guinea worm, he simply made the unrelated mistake of writing an appallingly biased and bad book. But having parlayed his former public office into global influence, he owes the public at least this much: Tell us, clearly and directly, enough about your supporters and their money that we can, with full information, decide for ourselves what is going on.

Contact David Haimson at DvHaimson@aol.com to receive emails with direct links to articles on Israel that are well-worth reading.

To Go To Top

OLMERT GOVERNMENT STOPPED IDF FROM PREVENTING ARMS FLOW TO HIZBALLAH
Posted by ZOA, January 23, 2007.

New York -- A high-ranking Israel Defense Forces (IDF) officer has disclosed that the Israeli government has "tied the IDF's hands" and is preventing military operations that could stop Hizballah from rearming and gaining strength ahead of a possible new round of violence this summer. The officer said that, "This is not up to the IDF ... The government is responsible for making these decisions, and for now they are holding us back." He explained that, despite the fact that Hizballah is known to be receiving almost daily arms shipments from Syria, the Israeli Cabinet has decided the military should refrain from initiating operations to thwart the smuggling. The IDF also believes that Hizballah has now restored its strength to the same level it had before last year's Lebanon war (Jerusalem Post, January 21).

Also, the Director of IDF Strategic Planning, Brig.-Gen. Udi Dekel, has said that Hizballah was busy rearming and receiving "nonstop" weapons shipments from Syria. This was the first time a high-ranking IDF officer has publicly confirmed that Damascus is shipping weapons to Hizballah. Addressing the Herzaliya Conference, Dekel warned that the Middle East is becoming increasingly "unstable" and that Iranian involvement in almost every conflict in the region is intensifying. According to Dekel -- the highest ranking officer to appear at the conference -- the terrorist group Hamas is also smuggling weapons into the Gaza Strip from Egypt, across the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egypt-Gaza border. Dekel said the cabinet and the IDF faced the "constant dilemma" of whether to act to thwart the terror buildup in Gaza and Lebanon or to prepare for a new war instead. He said the IDF planned to use 2007 "to get ready" for possible additional conflicts (Jerusalem Post, January 21).

The Zionist Organization of America, founded in 1897, is the oldest pro-Israel organization in the United States. The ZOA works to strengthen U.S.-Israel relations, educates the American public and Congress about the dangers that Israel faces, and combats anti-Israel bias in the media and on college campuses. Its past presidents have included Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis and Rabbi Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Contact them at www.zoa.org or send an email to email@zoa.org

To Go To Top

SO TURKEY WANTS TO JOIN THE GLOBALIST, SHAMEFUL EU...
Posted by Michael Travis, January 23, 2007.

Case 1. A Muslim teen murders a prominent Turkish-Armenian journalist by shooting him three times almost at point blank and shouting "I shot the non-Muslim". What do you think should be the reaction of a Turkish official to this?

Sevket Kazan, Deputy of the Saadet Party (SP) of Turkey, argued that the CIA and Mossad planned and organized the murder of Armenian Turkish journalist Hrant Dink. "The boys were used in Trabzon and in Sisli attacks and murders, but the real murderer are the CIA and the Mossad" he said. Sevket Kazan further continued in his Diyarbakir speech: "Armenian journalist Hrant Dink is a victim of an assassination. Of course, it is an event to be condemned.... Both a priest in Trabzon and Dink were killed by boys under 18. The CIA and the Mossad are behind all these murders, yet they use domestic tools for these crimes. Their main aim is to destabilize Turkey."

Case 2. A Turkish father takes his daughter for a walk. (hat tip: The Religion of Peace)

Turkish father and daughter

Would you like these to happen in your streets, Europe?
(Already does happen in the streets of Islam infested Germany---M.Travis)

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

102 SUDANESE SLAVES FREED
Posted by Maria Sliwa, January 23, 2007.

This Press Release comes from Christian Solidarity International (CSI). Visit their website at http://www.csi-int.org CSI has been in the forefront of the campaign to eradicate slavery in Sudan since 1995, and is commemorating this year the 30th anniversary of its foundation and the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the British slave trade.

(AWEIL, Southern Sudan) Last week, 102 Black African slaves were liberated from Baggara Arab masters and returned to their homeland in Southern Sudan in an action supported by Christian Solidarity International (CSI).

Most of the liberated slaves -- mainly boys and young men -- had been captured by Sudanese government-sponsored Arab militias during two decades of civil war, pitting the Arab-Muslim dominated Government of Sudan against the predominantly Black African Sudan People's Liberation Front (SPLA).

Interviews reveal a strong pattern of physical and psychological abuse. The overwhelming majority of the liberated slaves had been subjected to beatings, racial and religious insults, forced labor and denial of the freedom to practice any religion other than Islam. Most of the girls and women had been subjected to sexual abuse. Among the slaves were:

16-year-old Agor Deng: Agor was repeatedly raped by her master, Adam Abakir and his associates. Adam Abakir and his wife excised her finger nails with a knife after she failed to obey an order to grind grain. They also forced her, using death threats, to pray like a Muslim.

30-year-old Garang Akot Wiir: Garang's right arm and leg were partially paralyzed after having been beaten and tied up tightly for 24 hours as punishment for attempting to escape. He was renamed Abdelrazik Ezzadin by his master.

45-year-old Achol Loc Wiel: Achol was shot in her leg during a slave raid. She also lost her husband and three children during the slave raid and forced march to Northern Sudan. Achol was gang raped by her master's friends. She was also forced to abandon the practice of her Christian faith and pray like a Muslim.

The liberation and documentation of the 102 slaves was the result of cooperation between Arab-Dinka Peace Committees, the civil authorities in Aweil State, local churches and CSI.

The Sudanese Episcopalian priest, Rev. Tito Athian -- a longstanding local CSI partner -- expressed joy at the liberation and repatriation of the slaves, stating: "Thank you for helping bring back our people from slavery. Now they are free to hear the Good News of Jesus Christ and choose their own religion."

After witnessing several CSI slave liberation actions, including last week's, anti-trafficking consultant and author of The Jubilee Prophecy, Aaron Cohen, said: "I have seen first hand, in 23 countries, the positive changes good programs can have in the lives of enslaved people. CSI has created in Sudan a sustainable and effective program which has liberated thousands of slaves, inspired anti-trafficking legislation, and brought hope to people in bondage. CSI's pioneering work in Sudan is an excellent example to all abolitionists."

Contact Maria Sliwa at SliwaNews@email.admail.net

To Go To Top

EX-IDF CHIEF OF STAFF: ISRAELI CONCESSIONS WON´T HELP
Posted by Hillel Fendel, January 23, 2007.

"An end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will not solve the problems of the Middle East," Yaalon says. "Israeli concessions will only strengthen extremist Islam."

Speaking at the Herzliya Conference today, the former Chief of Staff said, "Conventional wisdom has it that a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will bring stablity to the Middle East. It is also widely felt that the core problem is Israel's occupation [of Judea and Samaria] and that a two-state solution will solve the 100-year-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

"These two mistaken assumptions," Yaalon said, "do not allow a new type of thinking that can truly solve the problem."

The Palestinians have no interest in a two-state solution with Israel, Yaalon said: "They have never agreed to any partition of the land. They objected to the Peel Commission's proposal in 1937, and to the UN's plan in 1947, and again in 2000 in Camp David. Arafat's rejection then of Ehud Barak's generous offer [of 95-98% of Judea and Samaria] and the war he launched instead showed that his goal was to prevent a two-state solution and, especially, the recognition of Israel... The fact that Kassams continue to fly from Gaza also prove this... Hamas has made it quite clear as well: they are interested in one Arab state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea."

Similarly, he said, "The objective of Hizbullah is not the liberation of southern Lebanon -- but rather the destruction of Israel... World War III is currently underway; a clash of civilizations between the West and radical extremist Islam. Al-Qaeda did not arise because of Israel, and the State of Israel was not yet around when the Muslim Brotherhood was formed [in 1928]..."

"Therefore," Yaalon said, "in my opinion, a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will not bring calm to the Middle East... The lack of an authoritative Palestinian leadership that is capable or willing to implement a two-state solution, and the fact that an entire young Palestinian generation is being brought up on hatred and death, shows that the two-state paradigm is not relevant now, if at all."

Listeners to public taxpayer-supported Israel Radio were prevented from hearing Yaalon's words, as broadcaster Gabi Gazit cut off the broadcast after three minutes. Gazit said he would return to the speech if Yaalon said something more "actual and hot." On the other hand, Gazit "allowed" the broadcast of the left-wing speech of Defense Minister Amir Peretz nearly in its entirety.

"We have experienced too many golden calves in the past years," Yaalon said, "that were supposed to give us hope and provide quick solutions. What we need is leadership that will give true solutions, not spins."

Among these quick-fix "golden calves" was, presumably, Ariel Sharon's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and northern Shomron. Yaalon was replaced at the IDF helm by Sharon and Defense Minister Mofaz shortly before the Disengagement, after Yaalon said the withdrawal would strengthen terrorism.

"Unilateral Israeli concessions will only strengthen Islamic Jihad and terrorism," Yaalon emphasized again today. "International pressure upon Israel for further concessions, or unilateral Israeli withdrawals, are seen as weakness and will only encourage them to continue to attack Israel and the West."

Regarding Iran, the former IDF head said that we must stop thinking in terms of an immediate solution, and rather seek a long-range approach: "There is no choice other than a conflict with the Iranian regime. The entire world must understand that the Iranian problem is not a local one, and that the transfer of technological and financial means to Iran must be stopped immediately... Those who do not prevent the transfer of these means are bringing the conflict closer. The Syrian and Iranians must be punished by the world; they pushed Hizbullah to war but were not punished."

Regarding Israel's preparedness for the recent war in Lebanon, Yaalon said, "The problems were not in the soldiers or the equipment, but rather a failure of military and political leadership. With the upcoming changes of personnel, I am confident that the army will return to itself very quickly."

Asked about his own role in Israel's lack of sufficient preparedness for the war -- Yaalon was Chief of Staff from 1992 to 1995 -- he said that he will be happy to answer this question after he testifies on the matter before the Winograd Commission. The commission, headed by former Tel Aviv District Court Justice Eliyahu Winograd, is investigating the events and preparations leading up to the summer's Lebanon War.

Hillel Fendel is senior editor at Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com).

To Go To Top

JEWISH WITHDRAWAL FROM JUDEA AND SAMARIA BACK ON THE TABLE
Posted by Jake Levi, January 23, 2007.
This was written by Hana Levi Julian and it appeared in Arutz Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com).

The government has agreed in principle to withdraw from most of Judea and Samaria ("Yesha"), in secret talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. So reports WorldNetDaily.

Egypt and the European Union (EU) have been mediating the negotiations, according to the World Net Daily (WND) news website. WND quoted high-level Egyptian diplomatic and intelligence officials, and an aide to EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, as saying they have been directly involved in the talks.

Negotiations have been quietly proceeding apace for the past two or three weeks, according to sources quoted by WND reporter Aaron Klein, after PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas suggested to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert late last month that the two men switch to "back channel talks" in order to avoid media coverage.

According to Egyptian and EU sources, one of the plans currently under consideration involves handing over control of central and southern Yesha to PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's security forces. In northern Yesha, the transfer of responsibility to Abbas' security forces over the area would be monitored by Jordan and EU observers.

No word about the fate, under this plan, of the many tens of thousands of Jews living in these areas has been received.

Hamas's role in the plan remains unclear. The terrorist organization has repeatedly vowed never to formally recognize the State of Israel, renounce terrorism or uphold agreements with Israel signed by the previous, Fatah-led, PA government. That stance is not accepted by the international community.

Talks toward a unity coalition between PA Prime Minister and Hamas chairman Ismail Haniyeh and Mahmoud Abbas, who heads the Fatah faction, are all but dead, leaving Hamas in control of the PA.

The streets of Gaza have become a battlefield as Hamas and Fatah struggle for control of the PA government, with bloody clashes that have resulted in the deaths of both terrorists and innocent PA residents alike in what has become a militia war.

The situation may intensify further and eventually lead to escalated attacks against the Jewish State as well, in the wake of an announcement by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week that the Bush administration has agreed to finance, arm and train Abbas' security force.

The force will reportedly include the Fatah-controlled Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades, one of the most vicious groups engaged in the terrorist war against Israel. Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades has shared responsibility with the Islamic Jihad terror group for the suicide bombings in Israel over the past two years.

Rice said during her visit to the region last week that the U.S. will send Abbas $86.4 million to beef up his personal security guard, Force 17, which also polices PA areas in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. The Bush administration is hoping to strengthen Fatah -- which it perceives as a moderate group -- in its bid to wrest control of the PA government from Hamas.

The last time the U.S. transferred arms to Fatah in order to strengthen its ability to police the PA, the weapons were ultimately pointed at Israel by a myriad of terrorist factions. When asked about that experience, Rice claimed that this time would be different.

"It was envisioned [then] that the Palestinian Authority would have security forces," she said. "The problem is those security forces broke into essentially personal militias under [former PLO chairman Yasser] Arafat. They broke into too many that were often warring with each other."

The current plan, she added, would be carried out in a way that would "move over time," with the idea being that the U.S. would maintain control over what is being done with the weapons.

"This plan is not just to equip [Abbas' security forces] and train them, [but] it is also to professionalize them, to unify them [and] to put them under a single command," she said.

Now these newly-armed forces, trained and "professionalized" by the U.S. government would be given control over most of Judea and Samaria, placing them within rocket fire range of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Ben Gurion International Airport. They would also be within range of Arad in the Negev, and other cities and smaller communities located near the pre-1967 borders.

Diplomatic sources said talks are moving rapidly as the PA wrestles with Israel over the precise location of the new borders. Solana's aide told WND that diplomats are expected to see a "historic political evolution and movement in negotiations in the next few weeks and few months, unseen since the Camp David peace talks in 2000."

In 2000, then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to give Arafat an official PA state in Judea, Samaria, Gaza and eastern neighborhoods in Jerusalem. Arafat turned down the offer, insisting the entire Israeli capital be transferred to the PA.

Contact Jake Levi by email at jlevi_us@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

YEMEN'S LAST JEWS THREATENED AND BANISHED
Posted by Hillel Fendel, January 23, 2007.

Jews in Yemen have been abruptly targeted by a local sheikh, told they were "moral destroyers," and ordered to "leave or else" -- and some have. Jewish "sages" have been killed, one woman reports.

Only some 50 Jewish families remain in virulently anti-Israel Yemen, but after years of being largely ignored by the local population and authorities, they have now been targeted by Moslem extremists.

Some of the families, in the Yemeni capital Sanaa, were confronted by masked men who told them that if they do not leave within ten days, "things will be bad for you." Other Jews were told that the Moslems don't want to see even one Jew left in the region. Reports of Killings

In a phone call engineered by Voice of Israel Radio on Monday, a Jewish woman living in Yemen said that the Moslems "have already killed the wise men." No confirmation of this has been received from other quarters -- though news from Yemen does not flow freely.

The stated explanation for the Moslem anti-Semitism, according to a letter circulated by local Sheikh Yahya Sad Al Khudhair, is that the Jews are "associated with groups and activities that primarily serve global Zionism that works actively to corrupt the people and cause them to abandon their ethical values and religion and disseminate all types of abominations... Our religion has ordered us to fight the corrupt people and expel them."

In the Voice of Israel phone call, Masoud -- a Yemenite Jew who moved to Israel six years ago and now lives in Be'er Sheva -- spoke with a woman relative in Yemen. The conversation was held in Hebrew-spiced Arabic. "Kif halak?" Masoud asked in Arabic, meaning, "How are you?", and the response came in Hebrew, "Baurich Hashem," "Blessed be G-d."

The woman told Masoud, "On Friday [11 days ago], they received letters saying that whoever doesn't leave will get killed or have his children taken away or I don't know what... Now they saw these [threatening] letters and are scared; what can they do? They took everything they had, with the children, and left, and now they're in a hotel." Some 45 Jews are now reportedly in the Paris Tower Hotel in Saana.

Asked why the remaining Jews do not come to Israel, Masoud said simply that they are currently not interested in that option.

Earlier last week, according to the Yemen Observer, local authorities and tribal sheikhs held meetings to discuss the complaints from the Yemeni Jews -- but they resulted only in oral reassurances for the Jews, who were told to ignore the threats and go back to their villages. "Yes, they received threats," the area's Deputy Governor said Monday about the Jews, "and they are now here in the hotel, but I can assure you that the problem will be solved today, and the Jews will return to their villages."

Yemenite Jews Converted to Islam

Dr. Moshe Nachum, of the Israeli Federation of Yemenite Jews, accuses modern Israel of having led indirectly to many thousands of Jewish converts to Islam. He told Arutz-7 that 56,000 Jews -- roughly 2/3 of the Jewish population in Yemen -- were brought over to Israel during Operation Magic Carpet (also known as Operation Eagles' Wings) in 1949-50, following murderous Muslim riots. A trickle of migration was allowed to continue until 1954, at which point it stopped. In 1962, another 2,300 Jews were allowed to immigrate, but many families were then left split between Israel and Yemen.

"I went to Yemen in 1977," Nachum said, "at which time I learned that there were between 25,000 and 28,000 Jews there. No one was allowed to leave until 1993, at which time a trickle began, leading to a total of 900 or 1,000 Jews coming to Israel. A few hundred now remain there."

Hillel Fendel is senior editor of Arutz Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com). This article appeared today on Arutz-Sheva
(www.mymarketing.co.il/Show/0XFAF647A66065914EFFC2B03D2C54162927 D035218139A1CD2B18D517183476B3.htm).

To Go To Top

THINK OF ISRAEL AS THE TITANIC
Posted by Ted Belman, January 23, 2007.

Rice: "This time it will be different". REALLY?

It appears to me that there is an iceberg out there called the "peace process". So much is going on beneath the surface that the peak only hints at.

Think of Israel as the Titanic.

The following items are all part of a grand plan in no particular order,

1. Israel decided not to invade Gaza and instead just announced a $70 million program to fortify the homes near Gaza.
2. Olmert has made many speeches offering to give away most of Judea and Samaria.
3. Olmert has tied the hands of the IDF citing diplomatic considerations.
4. Peretz backed off his announcements to build in the Jordan and Ma'aleh Adumin.
5. The construction of the fence is proceeding through Jerusalem.
6. Israel has agreed to the the transfer of weaponry to Abbas and the efforts to make it strong enough to take on Hamas.
7. Israel has agreed to transfer $100 million in tax revenue to Abbas
8. A three way meeting (Rice, Abbas and Olmert) has been announced to be held soon.
9. Israel has said that the Saudi Plan might be a basis for discussion.
10. Olmert has met with S. Arabia and Jordon.
11. The idea of withdrawing from Judea and Samaria as we did in Gaza has been mooted.
12. There is agreement on removing checkpoints.
13. The GOI continues to clamp down of settlers whom it considers "subversives".
14. Today we read about secret negotiations leading to withdrawal from Judea and Samaria.
15. Today we read about the "desirability" of joining NATO.
16. Rice has stated that this time "it will be different" referring to the arming of the Arabs.
17. A "ceasefire" is in place as a backdrop to negotiations
18. Livni wants to move past the first stage of the Roadmap requiring an end to violence.
19. Lieberman was brought into the government to enlarge the coalition and neuter the right to some extent.
20. Secret negotiations with Syria have been announced with the outline of a deal.

What I discern from all this is that the intention is that the security force being built for Abbas will enforce the peace. This time it will be different according to Rice, because S. Arabia, Jordon and Egypt are committed to ensure that he does so although she hasn't said so. All are agreed to destroy Hamas and neuter Hezbollah and to face down Iran and to support the government of Iraq against Iranian influence.

Such an agreement will involve normalization of relations.

Think of Israel as the Titanic.

Ted Belman
Israpundit.com
416-256 7597

Ted Belman hosts IsraPundit.com. He can be reached at tedbel@rogers.com

To Go To Top

A HISTORY OF ANTI-SEMITISM ON CAMPUS
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 22, 2007.
1. "A History of Anti-Semitism on Campus"
By Amihai Glazer
Amihai Glazer is a professor of economics at the University of California, Irvine (UCI). He received his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1978.
This is From Standwithus.org

The hate speech practiced by the Muslim Student Union at UCI is well known. Also well known is the UCI Administration's repeated statements that the Muslim Student Union has freedom of speech rights to organize such events as "Holocaust in the Holy Land." They are right. Free speech has more protection at a public university than perhaps at any other location; even administrators who find the Muslim Student Union despicable agree that they have a right to organize events full of hate. Indeed, though speakers cannot incite listeners to violence against a specified individual, they do have the right to incite generalized hatred of Jews and Zionists.

But that does not mean that the University Administration is bound to silence. University presidents at several campuses have embraced the opportunity to denounce hate speech. In September 2002, Harvard President Lawrence Summers issued a memorable speech citing the upturn in anti-Semitic incidents and noting that supposedly progressive universities were taking part in actions that were "anti-Semitic in effect if not in intent." Faculty and students calling for divestiture from firms investing in Israel, but from nowhere else, offer one example.

Chancellor Berdahl of UC-Berkeley signed a letter published in The New York Times warning against extreme anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish activity on campus. (UCI's chancellor at the time, Ralph Cicerone, refused to sign the letter.) In September 2002 the president of the University of Michigan, Mary Sue Coleman, concerned about a forthcoming conference which featured vehemently anti-Zionist speakers, issued a statement saying: "This conference is sponsored by a student organization, following established University procedures for holding events on campus ... The agenda of the conference represents the views of the organizers and not the University of Michigan."

Faced with another anti-Zionist conference (planned by New Jersey Solidarity), Richard L. McCormick, President of Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, stated "For myself, I find abhorrent some elements of NJ Solidarity's mission" In its mission statement, NJ Solidarity expresses its opposition to Israel's right to exist and supports Palestinians human right to resist occupation and oppression by any means necessary. These views are in conflict with my own and, I believe, with the majority of the university community." He went on to state: "Freedom of expression must not be used to incite hatreds or demonize individuals and groups."

In contrast, UCI has stood silently as speeches espousing violence were delivered on campus. One such occurrence was in spring 2002, at a forum which then-chancellor Cicerone attended. A panelist, Visiting Professor James Sterba, spent his allotted time justifying suicide bombings against civilians. No one from the Administration in attendance ever distanced himself from such a view. In winter 2004 and again during the week of May 17, 2004, UCI witnessed a public lecture by Amir Abdel Malik Ali, a known hate-monger invited by the Muslim Student Union during its "Anti-Oppression Week" and during its "Anti-Zionism/Zionist Awareness Week." Mr. Ali had the honor of making his hateful speech from a lectern emblazoned with the UCI emblem. Fortunately, the UCI Administration no longer allows such implicit approval. But the Administration does continue its practice of not enforcing its own rules when they are violated by the Muslim Student Union. For example, the Muslim Student Union was allowed to erect a massive "Apartheid Wall" on a public walkway, though University policy forbids even the placement of paper posters on public walkways.

UCI continues in other ways to aid and abet anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli activity. This year, UCI honored Ms. Vanessa Zuabi with the Outstanding Community Service award at its 2006 Lauds & Laurels Awards ceremony. When Ms. Zuabi was vice president of the Society of Arab Students, the group organized a rally in May 2004, purportedly to demonstrate unity against hate crimes. The rally came a week after the group's anti-Israel cardboard wall was destroyed. Jewish student group leaders approached the leaders of SAS and expressed sympathy about the destruction of the wall, noting that they had suffered a similar incident the year before, when their Holocaust memorial was destroyed. The Jewish student groups expressed their interest in showing their solidarity in the cause of peace by participating in the rally with SAS and the rest of the UCI community. Had Ms. Zuabi and the rest of the SAS leadership truly been interested in promoting peace and in bringing the campus community together, she and her fellow group members would have accepted this overture. Instead, the Jewish student groups were told that they were not welcome, and unlike other groups on campus, were not allowed to speak at the rally. Furthermore, a rally organized by the Society of Arab Students had a poster with a drawing equating the Star of David to a swastika. The week after "Holocaust in the Holy Land," UCI announced that Ms. Zuabi would be honored as the student speaker for the commencement ceremony of the School of Social Sciences In short, UCI honored a person who had engaged in anti-Semitic activity.

Nevertheless, there is hope. On May 30, 2006, Chancellor Drake issued a public statement, saying "Make no mistake: I find hate speech abhorrent. It is inconsistent with advancing understanding or dialogue...I ask you to join me in renouncing hate speech as a form of expression..." Though the timing of the statement suggests that it was issued in response to "Holocaust in the Holy Land," the statement does not explain who engaged in hate speech, or who were its victims. I wish a future statement would. 2. "Palestinian street named for Saddam Hussein was paved with USAID money" by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook Palestinian Media Watch: Palestinian Media Watch Bulletin -- Jan. 22, 2007 p:+972 2 625 4140e: pmw@pmw.org.il f: +972 2 624 2803w: www.pmw.org.il

After Saddam Hussein's execution, the Palestinian Municipality of Yaabid decided to name both a school and its main street after the Iraqi dictator.

It appears that the same street was paved 18 months ago using grants from USAID.

This is not the first time that US money has gone to build Palestinian infrastructures that are named to glorify terrorists and enemies of the US.

Three examples:

1. After the US gave the Jenin municipality money for road works in the city, a block in the center of Jenin was named for the first Iraqi suicide terrorist who killed four American soldiers in Fallujah. The mayor of Jenin participated in the anti-American rally and the speakers blessed the "resistance of the residents of Fallujah" [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, April 4, 2004].

2. USAID funded the building of the Salaf Khalef Sports Center. Salef Khalef (Abu Iyad) the head of the Black September terror organization, was behind the killing of two US diplomats in Sudan and the 11 Israeli Olympic athletes. [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May, 30, 2004]

3. USAID funded renovations of the Dalal Mughrabi School named in honor of Dalal Mughrabi and her terror group, who killed American photographer Gail Rubin and 36 Israelis. [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, December 14, 2004]

The following is the article on the naming of Saddam Hussein Street:

"In the Yaabid Municipality. thousands of citizens held a requiem for the soul of Saddam in the mosque. Following that, a march began in the streets of the municipality, that ended at the offices of the Yaabid Municipality, where a mourners' tent was opened in his memory. Public figures and the [Armed] Factions in Yaabid decided to name one of the schools in the municipality and its most important street after Saddam to immortalize his memory and to emphasize the values of Arabness and Jihad, which he represented." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, January 4, 2007]

The following is from the PMW archives on the USAID funding:

"The Yaabid Municipality in the Jenin area held a ceremony yesterday for the inauguration of a project of the paving of the main street of the municipality, funded by the United Stated Agency for International Development (USAID). The project of paving and renovating the main entrance to the municipality and some of the inner streets is three kilometers long and cost $402,000." [Al-Ayyam, July 14, 2005]

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

WOULD IRAN'S MULLAHS USE THE BOMB?
Posted by Amil Imani, January 22, 2007.

There is so much smoke around the Iranian Mullahs' bomb that makes Tehran's smog feel like a fresh ocean breeze, by comparison. Here is a partial list of views about the Mullahs, their capabilities and intentions about the bomb affair. The Mullahs:

* Will never dare to use the bomb, even if they had it. To do so would be suicidal.
* Are years away from anything resembling a credible bomb, in any quantities.
* They lack the technological skills needed to make a workable bomb.
* Don't have the means of hitting Israel with the bomb, their professed favorite target.
* Want the bomb for defensive purposes only.
* Would never hand the bomb over to proxy terrorists.
* Are using this whole bomb thing as a ploy to rally the populace and survive.
* Are visionary patriots planning for a future when the oil dries up.
* Are environmentalists aiming to curb global warming caused by the use of fossil fuel.
* Are striving to join the nuclear club for its prestige.

And on, and on, and on, goes the litany. I believe, based on facts rather than wishful thinking, that every one of the above assertions, as well as all other similar dismissive arguments are both false and fraught with danger, because all the above arguments are confounded by various amounts of denial.

Psychological denial is a common quirk of the human mind. People use denial to distort, even refute reality, when accepting it is too threatening to them. Alcoholics are habitual users of denial, a major tranquilizer of the mind. The alcoholic will adamantly deny having any problem with alcohol and continues to drink, even in the face of irrefutable contrary evidence. Denial is resorted to by both individuals and groups, and can be just as deadly for both.

Perhaps the most compelling dismissive argument is that the Mullahs would never dare to use the bomb, since it would be suicidal to do so. This argument is just as flawed as the rest. The "mutual deterrence" argument may work in state-to-state confrontations. It apparently has worked in the past and the hope is that it will work in the future. However, the mutual deterrence argument fails when a non-state entity is the adversary. The Mullahs don't have to lob a bomb at Israel or at anyone else to inflict huge harm. They can pursue their cause of death and destruction by simply providing their killers with dirty bombs in a suitcase. Given the Mullahs' fanaticism and Machiavellian nature, they would come up with a myriad of clever schemes to achieve their objectives.

Consider dirty bombs. They are easy to make, are portable, can kill as well as make a city uninhabitable, without leaving a "finger print." The Mullahs can go to work then turn "innocently" to the international community for help them -- to find a group of rogue radicals, so they claim, who had penetrated their facilities and have made off with a loot of radioactive stuff.

It is not as if events like this have never happened in the past. Deadly stolen radioactive materials have found their way to the black market on a number of occasions. The world would respond in panic, yet with its usual arthritic sluggishness searching for the miscreants. Given how clumsy and disorganized the world's intelligence community is, the prospect of acting expeditiously, much less apprehending the "thieves" is not very encouraging. This is particularly the case when the Mullahs themselves would have a short leash on the "thieves," to hide them and deploy them only with the greatest of care.

Iran's ruling Mullahs are clustered around major factions such as the conservatives, the moderates, and the so-called reformists. Yet, the differences among these factions are tactical rather than strategic. One and all share the same overarching goal of defeating the "Crusader-Zionists" by any and all methods possible; bringing about the "end of the world" Armageddon; and, thereby creating the requisite conditions for the appearance of the Hidden Imam, the Mahdi, to assume his rule of the world.

Therefore, it is Cart Risqué (foolish risk-taking a la Jimmy Carter's throwing the nation's lot with the Mullahs during the 1979 Iranian Revolution) to overlook the fact that it is Islam, irrespective of any and all considerations, that poses a deadly threat to the world. Choosing one faction over another is no choice at all.

What is the likelihood that the ruling Mullahs will actually use the bomb? If they remain in power long enough to have it, they are very likely to use it, in one form or another. At the very least, they use the bomb for blackmail and intimidation in the region. Not even the all-out nuclear exchange can be ruled out. Islam is a religion centered on death with the faithful eyes fixed on the afterlife and its promised eternal pleasures. If the faithful kills, he goes to Allah's paradise; if he gets killed, he goes to Allah's paradise.

The Mullahs' claim that they are pursuing the nuclear program to meet the country's energy need could only fool the most gullible-denial type. Why is it that the Mullahs invest nothing at all in stopping the leak of more than six percent of the precious oil they pump out? For every 100 barrels, six barrels of Iran's irreplaceable national treasure dissipates at the wellhead. Yet, they spend billions of dollars to harness nuclear energy. Just as troubling is the fact that Iran sits on one of the world's most dangerous earthquake fault lines. Building nuclear plants on sites such as the one in Bushehr is absolute insanity.

Speaking of insanity, Ahmadinejad, the Monkey, comes to mind. He is dismissed as being a zany fanatic who shouldn't be taken seriously for his bomb-rattling threats. But this type of dismissiveness can prove deadly. Recall that even a multi-billionaire former president of Iran Rafsanjani, a man seen by many as moderate and a shrewd live-let-live type, has publicly announced that a single bomb would finish off Israel while the Muslims would suffer a setback from which it can easily recover.

The Mullahs are proven vicious mass killers. They summarily executed tens of thousands of Iranian dissidents. They had no qualms at sending thousands of children to clear the minefields ahead of their tanks during the 80-89 war with Iraq; and, they have thousands of "martyrs" brainwashed and prepared to serve as bomb mules to be dispatched to any place in the world.

Sadly, once again it is the peak of "Me First" time with American politicians. Like sharks, they are circling the "bleeding" lame President, busily snipping at him and hoping to take his place. In the meantime the real enemy, Islamofascism is forging ahead toward its goal of dominating the world.

I have been warning that it is a deadly miscalculation to engage in infighting, and sit and wait this emerging catastrophe out. It is little more than an exercise in denial to believe that nothing bad will happen, and that the corrupt inept Mullahs will likely shoot themselves in the foot instead of wreaking havoc on the world. I also keep pleading that we should forthwith help the Iranian democratic oppositions send the death-bearer Mullahs back to their mosques. It is the free world's best and urgent option.

What sane person would want to take a chance to wait and see if the mad Mullahs, once they have the bomb, would use it or not?

Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. He maintains a website, www.AmilImani.com

To Go To Top

ISLAMIC CHARITY SHAM! MUSLIM ABUSE SHELTER TAX SHELTER?
Posted by Michael Travis, January 22, 2007.

This comes from the Atlas Shrugs website.

NISA is a non-profit organization of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), established as a vehicle towards alleviating issues related to abuse and domestic violence Our mission is to help men and women achieve domestic harmony and a happy family life in the SF Bay Area.

But NISA, the North American Islamic Shelter for the Abused, doesn't exist. After exhaustive investigative efforts, we find NISA is a shell. A cellphone. There is no Islamic shelter for abused women (wifebeating, btw, is in the Koran) has no shelter. So what exactly are they raising money for? In an ATLAS EXCLUSIVE, covert Atlas operative Julie blew the lid right off what appears to be a bogus Islamic charity.

First off understand that Muslims do not believe in getting into anyone else's family business.

In Muslim households are the head of the family and like gods. The authorities, 99.9% of the time in Middle Eastern countries, turn a blind eye to any complaint a woman has, but they seem to let the husbands know she complained...which brings her to more beatings...

Now they [NISA] have been fundraising BIG TIME with CAIR, and I checked them out...they have only an 800 number for women to call. Other than that one phone line, they can act like a charity, while collecting huge amounts and funneling it somewhere, since all they have is a PO BOX.

This phantom Islamic abused women's shelter gives out awards (to give bogus cred to say Imam Tahir Anwar, one of the "Muslim Leader of Tomorrow" [See http://www.asmasociety.org/mlt2006/usa.html]) He speaks 5 languages fluently, and was recently the recipient of the Community Service Award from NISA (North American Islamic Shelter for the Abused).

NISA has hooked up with a local catholic church as well. They are listed by this muslim group as the place where they offer services for abused Muslim women. Julie wrote to the church trying to actually track down the non-existent shelter and the folks at NISA. Since NISA was affiliated with the church, she asked the Church of Palo Alto for their info. Here is the exchange;

Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:22:13 -0800 (PST)
From: XXXXXX
Subject: RE: NA Shelter for the Abused
To: "Michael Clemons"

Well, check Google....your church appears there as associated with this group. One of your webpages references them as well.

[This is from a google search on the Unity Palo Alto Community Church:

1. Sharing abundance is an important part of Unity Palo Alto Community Church's sharing prosperity and community outreach.
Unity Palo Alto Community Church -- Giving | Sharing Abundance ... The mission of the North-American Islamic Shelter for the Abused (NISA) is to help women and men achieve domestic harmony and a happy family life in the SF ...
www.unitypaloalto.org/giving/ tithe_recipients_2005.html -- 27K -- Cached -- Similar

2. Unity Palo Alto Community Church -- Giving | Sharing Abundance ...
Unity Palo Alto Community Church participates in community outreach, ... The mission of the North-American Islamic Shelter for the Abused (NISA) is to help ... www.unitypaloalto.org/giving/ tithe_recipients_2005.html -- 27k -- Cached -- Similar pages

I checked and this group has no address other than a PO Box, and yours, and they even refer to your church on their website.http://www.ask-nisa.org/

They appear with CAIR, and radical muslim groups to "fundraise" for the abused muslim women. However, nowhere in the US are there any muslim shelters for abused women, and I do feel your church should inform the FBI. CALL 4-11 in our area and ask for the local office of the FBI. They would be the ones to investigate anyway.

This group, NISA,says they have a toll free hotline, 1- 888-ask-nisa but someone should call this who is an agent and speaks fluent Arabic, and this should be the FBI. I am wondering who calls this hotline, since muslim women are too afraid to speak out about their problems. My husband is a convert to Islam. I know much about the subject, since I edit his books, one of which is on the very subject of women who are abused by islam.

This so-called non-profit group seems to have no other goal than fundraising... I would think you would want to avoid notifying them, but let the FBI know, and the FBI should do all of the contact. You could interefere in something crucial to our security... if you do not simply ask the FBI to look into it.

Michael Clemons wrote:

Julie,

I do not know what to tell you as We do not have any information on the North American Islamic Shelter for the Abused.

Blessings
Michael

From: XXXXXXXX
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:21 AM
To: office@unitypaloalto.org
Subject: NA Shelter for the Abused

I am trying to locate the North American Islamic Shelter for the Abused. I could not find it on Google. I came to your website, but I do not see how to contact them. Please tell me if there is such a shelter, and if it located within the one existing shelter in Santa Clara County.

Thank you...If you have any contact info I would appreciate it.

Julie W. Ali
Palo Alto

Note: forwarded message attached.

Julie called NISA -- she called for help. No one answered. She got a call from a woman who apparently called back on a cell phone. When asked about the number, the caller, Saha, said she "forgot to do the caller ID block."

She said they do that for "security reasons." The cell phone number is (650) 930-0978 ...she said they only recently got cell phones. Most likely she was the designated person to take incoming calls for the hotline, and they are routinely forwarded to one or another's home phones.

She said they had no shelter.

Saha said they have shelters out there [government sponsored ones!!]

The phone is registered to Sriram Gopalan.

Who is Sriram Gopalan? He owns the cell phone that someone used to return my call to NISA, the North American Islamic Shelter for the Abused, a subsidiary of ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America, closely associated with CAIR.

I first learned of NISA through one of CAIR's email bulletins last Fall, about their joint fundraising efforts for an Islamic shelter for abused Muslim women. I looked to see what information was available. The "shelter" consisted of a PO Box, at

NISA of ISNA
P.O.Box 50515
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone:
(650) 856-0440
1-888-ask-nisa
Fax:
(650) 856-0444
Email:
admin@ask-nisa.org

The "hotline's" hours are listed from 10 am PST to 1 pm, a time when few women seem to be being abused. Their website is truly focused on donations from the public, and I do not see any accounting where this money is going. There is almost no oversight of non-profit organizations when it comes to the money they receive or spend. Their website does not say how much they have raised so far through CAIR, etc. and the Palo Alto Unity Church donation given to them back in October, 2006. I wonder who is watching the barn.

Certainly not the FBI.

However, my initial call went unanswered, and I did not leave a message. I got a return call about ten minutes later from a woman who identified herself as "Saha." Her English was that of a native, or at least an immigrant who grew up in US schools. She claims to be Afghan. She indicated she was using one of their several cell phones to return my call...so I saw the number on my caller ID...(650) 930-0978. She indicated she should have used the *67 beforehand for "security" reasons.

Saha had no information whatsoever for my Pakistani "friend," an abused woman neighbor of mine....she took four hours to get the wrong information to me.....several emails and some phone numbers in my area of the country. None of them was viable. I called her back, and she looked on the Internet while we were on the phone, and found one local shelter to which she referred me.

I found that the registered owner of the cell phone has a number of other phones in the Bay Area, and numerous residences. My intrigue continued, as I saw that he listed his date of birth only as 1979, but claiming to be 31 years old. My calulations are he would be 27 if he were born in 1979.

I found discrepancies enough in the information I paid for, that I obtained an email for him from his Internet posts. I wondered if someone had stolen his identity, since being 28 years old would make him very wealthy if he owned all the buildings and condos I saw listed.

I saw that he was Presisdent of the Indian Cultural Society at the University of Missouri, Maryland chapter. More residneces in and around the nation's capitol. He has numerous resdiences in Atlanta and other Georgia towns. He has relatives listed all over the USA...spome in New Jersey.

At one point, his identity seems to shift to being 61 years old when he lived in New Jersey. Could there be several people using this ID?

He wrote Steve Forbes' blog on a Flat Tax, and claims he would support it if the Flat Tax were zero. He seemed to think zero taxes are the way to go. Now, are his residences non-profit, his cell phones all non-profit, and his shelter non-existent? The gal who called me said they hope to have an Islamic Shelter next year. I can only imagine how big that building will be and for what it will actually be used.

Posted by Pamela Geller Oshry on Monday, January 22, 2007 at 06:30 PM in | Permalink | Comments (0) |

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top
http://www.jerusalem-4thtemple.org/accueil.html

I CHALLENGE US AMBASSADOR'S PRAISE OF ISRAEL'S RESTRAINT POLICY
Posted by Noam Bedein, January 22, 2007.

In the January 19th interview conducted by Jerusalem Post correspondent Herb Keinon with US Ambassador Richard Jones, it was most surprising to hear Mr. Jones say that "Now you are showing restraint...Because there is a cease-policy of restraint is improving your security in the long run. You really haven't suffered that much in terms of loss of life [from the Kassams] and you have given Gaza a little breathing space..."

Does Mr. Jones not know that the Al Aksa Brigades, the military wing of the Fateh, chaired by Machmud Abbas -- hardly a "fringe group" -- also takes credit for the 77 missile attacks on the Western Negev SINCE the November 26th, 2005 cease fire?

Meanwhile, does Ambassador Jones not understand that there was "no loss of life" over the past two months only because these missiles accidentally missed their civilian targets?

Can Ambassador Jones please explain just how Israelâ's security is "improved" when terrorists fire missiles to terrorize Israelâ's population in the Western Negev while Israel allows its adversaries in Gaza to regroup, rearm and reorganize?

What would happen if Mexico fired 77 missiles into Western Texas or if Canada fired 77 missiles into the Pacific North West? Would any American suggest a policy of restraint? Would any American suggest a policy of restraint?

Noam Bedein is Media Liason for Sderot Information Center For The Western Negev Ltd
(www.SderotMedia.com).

To Go To Top

THE FOURTH WAY -- ANNEX JUDEA AND SAMARIA
Posted by Bill Narvey, January 21, 2007.
[Editor's Note: Read the referenced Caroline Glick's article below.]

I believe Caroline Glick's article on the 4th way is the first time the demographic study results by Ettinger and Wise have made it into the MSM along with running up a flagpole, the rejection of a two state solution for a one Jewish state solution. That is an important beginning. If the JP has picked up on it, there is good reason to think that Ha'aretz could give it attention as well or be induced to do so and inject such thinking into the national debate.

The two state solution juggernaut pushed by the Quartet and most, if not all, of the West is going to be exceedingly difficult to derail.

As indicated, Ms. Glick's article hopefully will capture the attention and the imaginations of many Israelis who will begin to rethink Israel's future within the realm of reality. That is something that the GOI seems quite incapable of, either because Israel's current leadership has no capacity to think outside the box of the two state solution or because America, the quartet and the rest of the world will just not allow for such thinking.

The challenge is to raise awareness of realities that argue against a two state solution and for a one Jewish state solution, not only amongst Israelis, but Diaspora Jewry and pro-Israel advocates as well. If enough leading pro-Israel voices, within and outside of Israel can buy into and advocate the one state solution and create momentum for the public to address issues as they are and not as they wish they were, that just might break Western thinking free of the 2 state solution box that now confines the debate and limits vision.


Ted Belman wrote: "The Demographic Study Group including Yoram Ettinger and Mike Wise presented their studies and proposals for a One Jewish State Plan to the American Enterprise Institute (www.onejewishstate.com)."

One State Plan: A Democratic Jewish State

ONE STATE PLAN

The One State Plan extends Israeli democracy to the West Bank and is structured to assure that Israel remains a democratic Jewish State.

The Oslo Accords and various Two State Road Maps have failed. Regional and global dynamics have changed. Any independent state established in all or part of the West Bank will not be viable and will diminish Israel's security. It will quickly become a serious threat to Israel. Based on recent analysis, Israel and the West Bank have been demographically stable since 1967 and policy makers have made political decisions based on erroneous information and fallacious forecasts.

PLAN Highlights:

* Israel and the West Bank will be organized into regional Districts.
* Some of the Districts may be predominantly Arab.
* West Bank Arabs could qualify for citizenship or permanent residency, and others may opt for funded relocation.
* Districts will elect some Members of Knesset and the other MKs will be elected nationally.

Two-state plans are not viable and will lead to disastrous consequences.

As events in Gaza and Lebanon have unfolded more opinion leaders in Israel are beginning to understand the dangers inherent in all two state plans. Retired Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Moshe ("Bogey") Ya'alon dramatically warned, "In the past decade, the government of Israel and Israeli society decided to divide the land. In the present reality, I see difficulty in producing a stable situation of end-of-conflict within that paradigm." If a sovereign Palestinian state is created on the West Bank, the recent Gaza and Lebanon experiences and the behavior of the Hamas and Fatah leadership confirm that that state will be used as a stepping stone to further assault the State of Israel.

In April 2004, President Bush declared: "In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli population centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. And all previous efforts to negotiate a two-state solution have reached the same conclusion."

It is not too late to avoid the tragedies that the current status will bring. Israel must ensure its long-term success and include the entire West Bank in a democratic district governing structure.

Send your comments to support@onestateplan.com

TWO STATE PLANS

Two State Plans such as the Road Map, the Geneva Plan, Oslo Accords, and the Saudi Arabia Proposal seek to end the current status of indeterminacy and limbo. Many believe that Two State Plans will prevent an imaginary demographic catastrophe that would destroy Israel as a democratic Jewish State. Ironically, Two State Plans that seek to avoid demographic catastrophes, all permit unrestricted Arab immigration west of the Jordan River into the new Palestinian state. This unlimited immigration will quickly lead to an irreversible Demographic Catastrophe, and assure that the Jewish population west of the Jordan River will become a minority and could ultimately lead to the destruction of the State of Israel.

ALL Two State Plans are fatally flawed because they propose a sovereign state that could

ˇ not be a viable independent entity
ˇ be led by terrorists dedicated to the destruction of Israel
ˇ oppose the existence of a Jewish state
ˇ not resolve the claims of right of return and refugee issues
ˇ compound dual-loyalty problems for Israeli-Arabs
ˇ not resolve issues of Jerusalem
ˇ not resolve issues of "the settlers" and the settlements
ˇ become a global center of terrorism
ˇ be a treaty partner to terrorist and rogue regimes
ˇ support hate education in schools and mosques
ˇ support anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist, and anti-Semitic organizations globally
ˇ arm with conventional and unconventional weapons
ˇ create endless territorial, water, and resource disputes
ˇ lead to violence, war of attrition and a major conflict
ˇ create demographic problems between the sea and the river
ˇ lead to demoralization and/or destruction of the State of Israel

Jordan faces serious demographic and other challenges. More than half of its population are non-Hashemite Arabs. No one knows when the ruling minority Hashemite Kingdom will be replaced by a fundamentalist or other regime. It is irresponsible for Israeli leaders to preclude a two-state solution: a democratic Jewish State on the west bank of the Jordan River and an Arab State on the east bank of the Jordan River.

To Go To Top

NEW PROPOSAL: TRANSFER-FOR-CASH PLAN
Posted by Avodah, January 21, 2007.

This was written by Matthew Wagner and it appeared in the Jerusalem Post
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467783009&pagename= JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

NRP-NU MK Benny Elon

A new proposal designed to solve Israel's Arab demographic concerns suggests offering a million Palestinian residents of refugee camps in Judea and Samaria incentives totaling as much as $50 billion to convince them to leave the area.

Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, head of the Ateret Kohanim Yeshiva in Jerusalem, and MK Benny Elon (National Union-National Religious Party) have joined forces to promote the proposed program, which they said would be funded by the state. The two men, who are next door neighbors in Beit El, propose paying the refugee camp residents $50,000 to $100,000 each if they agree to emigrate.

"Those poor people have been suffering for six decades," said Elon. "I believe that if we give them the option of leaving they will grab it."

Elon said that he was astounded to discover that Palestinians who want to leave had difficulty getting to Ben-Gurion Airport, for security reasons.

Elon said many western countries, including Canada as well as some in South America, were open to immigrants, especially if they brought cash with them. He said he hoped to gain the cooperation of western countries for the program by emphasizing its humanitarian dimension.

Aviner, a respected halachic authority, has written an article advocating the transfer-for-payment idea, which appeared this weekend in Be'ahava U'Be'emuna, a pamphlet that is distributed in thousands of synagogues across the nation every Shabbat.

"Arabs are busy killing Jews or providing aid, cover and legitimacy to terrorists," Aviner said in a telephone interview.

"There is no end in sight. I do not want to keep killing them to protect myself. So the best solution is to encourage them to leave," he said. "As soon as the word gets around that Israel is paying compensation to anyone who leaves, it will have a snowball effect."

Aviner quoted the Koran as well as the Bible to demonstrate that the Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people.

Arabs who agreed to stop all terrorism against Israel and to accept second class citizenship, without voting rights, would be allowed to stay, Aviner said.

MK Ibrahim Sarsour (United Arab List-Ta'al) called the proposal "satanic," "fascist," and "nearly Nazi."

"Palestine is an integral part of Waqf-administered sacred Islamic land," said Sarsour, who is also the head of the Islamic Movement in Israel. "It belongs to the Muslim people. Benny Elon and others like him will have to trample over our dead bodies to remove us from this place."

Sarsour said "Islam" was willing to normalize relations with a sovereign Israel within the Green Line. He said all Jews living in the West Bank or eastern Jerusalem must leave their homes or renounce Zionism and agree to second-class citizenship, without voting rights.

"But Elon is trying to push for the option of conflict and extinction of both peoples," he said.

Sarsour said "zealots" like Elon and Aviner had caused the destruction of the Second Temple, and that history could repeat itself.

"The weak do not stay weak forever, nor do the strong," Sarsour said.


There were some of the "You must be Nazis if you want to want to move the Arabs out" comments but here are some comments that amplified the article.

60. Arabs and logic
Aviva -- Jerusalem, Israel
01/23/2007 03:27

Sarsour calls a plan for paying Arabs to leave "satanic, fascist and nazi" and then turns around and proposes exactly the same plan for Jews--only without compensation. So it is the compensation that makes the plan "satanic"? Also, nazis never paid the Jews to leave--they made the Jews PAY THEM for the privilege of being allowed to leave instead of being murdered.

57. This is a wonderful idea
Shira
01/22/2007 22:36

Giving money to the palis to leave is a wonderful idea but in the world that we are living in, they would rather live in filth and kill themselves and their children to wipe Israel off the map and destroy the Jews. If they wanted to they could easily go live elsewhere but they won't. and besides all the terrorist sponsors will pay more for the palis to stay put. Good luck I say, I hope this will work but I know how islamofacists work.

53. Where the money will come from
Tracy W
01/22/2007 19:26

"Palestine" is not viable. If it becomes a country, Palestinians will engage in every illicit deal available to survive. Or else they will continue to live off charity, like they've always done. Too much Western money continues to be poured on them already. It's cheaper for Israel and donors to pay now than to continue to pay for ever. Nobody can expect to make a decent living and have a normal life in a Palestinian state. Just look at Gaza now.

49. The Arabs want all Jews in E.Jerusalem and Judea Samaria to leave their homes -- isn't that satanic, fascist and nearly Nazi
Haim Cohen -- Israel
01/22/2007 19:03

If the Palestinians insist that all Jews leave their homes in Judea Samaria, they must agree that all Palestinian Arabs leave their homes within the Green Line.

45. to Dan 39
jackiekc -- USA
01/22/2007 17:53

Use the tax money that Israel has been hold to send the first guys away, then --as the cost of policing and the need for security lessens, use the money saved from that expense. There is always a way to find enough cash, if it enables Israel to get rid of potential terrorists.

44. The Fact That Arabs Were Ever Allowed In The Jewish Knesset Is Despicable. By Trying To Be 'Holier Than The Pope' Israel Has Slit Its Own Throat.
Adina Kutnicki -- US
01/22/2007 17:25

While the Israeli gov't has proven that transfer is doable with its 'settler' population, isn't it all the more imperative to transfer a burgeoning hostile Arab population? Sarsour's fantasies are exactly the reason this must be done. He and his fellow Islamists believe that the Jewish homeland belongs to the Arabs. Never mind that their own Koran says the opposite. Since they have been repeating this lie for decades most of the world has swallowed it.

43. Grab Offer With Both Hands.
maura collins -- Ireland.
01/22/2007 17:25

MK Sarsour would play no part in this, as he is a corrupt pol. He proposes the same, sans the Nazi tag, and thinks this is acceptable? This man should never have been given the opportunity to be a member of the Knesset, and that is the base fault of Israel trying to play fair with a people who have zero concept of fairness. That this offer was made at all is astonishing, and I, for one, would grab it with both hands.

42. Grab Offer With Both Hands.
maura collins -- Ireland.
01/22/2007 17:24

As a woman with children, should I be in the position that those in Samaria & Judea are in, I would do everything within my power to protect them, and no force on earth would sway me from my duty as their mother. I would hope to be smart enough to realistically see myself for what I am: fodder for the Pals, and would accept an offer of $$ and safe passage to a country willing to accept us. Continue>

40. Not a bad idea
Andrew -- Canada
01/22/2007 15:22

Not a bad idea -- As long as Israel coughs up the cash (NO hand-outs from the rest of the world. Of course if people want to make a donation then go ahead) A better idea would be to cut off ALL funding to the "holy land" (including the Israeli war machine) and let "God" decide who the choesn people are.

35. It won't happen precisely because IT WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM
Mo -- Israel
01/22/2007 08:49

There is a need for conflict in Israel, and anything that would end it peacefully with nobody having any grievances (as this plan would do) is unacceptable.

34. Is this guy for real?
Matt -- USA
01/22/2007 08:46

It may just be ironic editing for humor's sake, but the illogic and hypocricy of Sarsour's statements made me laugh out loud. The Jews should either move away, accept second class citizenship, or face Sarsour's thinly veiled threats of violence. On the other hand, a voluntary and generous financial inducement in the other directon is satanic and Nazi. Allah must be so proud.

33. This was Herut's plan from the last elections
Joy -- Israel
01/22/2007 06:25

Im happy that Benny Elon is adopting Kleiner's plan for assisted Arab emigration. Its agood plan and since Herut couldnt enter Knesset its good that someone else adopt the plan. Its really the only humane solution to our situation.

32. Sarsour plan
Victor -- Canada
01/22/2007 06:10

Mr Sarsour to be seriously considered should suggest a symmentric plan: to provide compensation for all relocated Jews from Arab funds (when those who were relocated from Gaza will get their compensation from PA?) and declare that Arabs also should not have electorial rights in Israel.

31. Transfer-for-cash plam
Gary A. Glaser -- USA
01/22/2007 05:45

I suppose next some leftist is going to start talking about the apartheid Israeli plan, while completly ignoring the fact that Sarsour proposed the exact same plan from a Moslem point-of-view. Of course, it is a well known fact that all non-Moslems are second-class citizens of any Moslem country, although a lot of people completely ignore this fact.

28. first try and think with their head.
gregorio -- argentina
01/22/2007 03:36

This plan is absolutly irrealistic. The worst option is to offer them money. They will happily take it, and in a short time, return, resettle, and ask for more. Blackmailers never quit, and the only way to deal with them is the one all know.

26. Imaginary Proposal
David Kopel -- USA
01/22/2007 03:02

Won't happen. Not now. Not ever. And under the remote possibility that Israel does make such a proposal, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Iran would counter-offer $150,000 to stay..

25. Solution since 1948!
William
01/22/2007 02:40

The UN had this solution on the books as part of the resolution that ended with the Israeli war of independence. According to Sansour, they are also Nazis (who also provide millions of $$$ in aid to Pal terrorists). This is not a new solution but kudos to Elon for taking the lead in doing something about it. Why would Arabs take it? Because no other viable solution exists -- and they're tired of being fodder for someone else's war.

24. $100,000 not to be sneezed at!
Joe -- USA
01/22/2007 02:33

'satanic, fascist, nearly Nazi' to offer $100,000 to move to a different country. I can't recall the fascists or Nazis offering Jews $100,000 to emigrate -- or many countries prepared to accept Germany's Jewish refugees. For $100,000 I would be happy to consider a move to a less stressful society.

23. Hyprocrisy -- Arabs already paid to stay
William
01/22/2007 02:28

Arab MKs mention of Nazis is always out of place. While this plan offers an incentive, but no force -- compare that to Arafat's henchman that paid off refugees to stay in camps and never leave (in order to make Pals look more pathetic) and threaten them if they do try to leave. Among many examples, the one that stands out is Israel's offer to build adequate housing in Gaza in the 80's, and all were rejected. Even the Koran says Israel is Jewish, despite Sansour.

22. Emigration to Arab countries
Tracy W
01/22/2007 02:15

Logic and fairness dictate that immigration from Muslim countries into the West should be blocked until they themselves open their doors to Palestinian immigrants, which they have always refused to do. Why has the West permitted this? I don't see ANY demand being made from coutries that actually lost the war with Israel. Why?

20. Kahane
Binyomin -- USA
01/22/2007 01:57

This was Kahane's plan. Change the name and then everyone likes it. Kahane Chai?

19. what did Sarsour say?
Al Kafr
01/22/2007 01:38

he thinks denying Arabs voting rights in Israel as "nazi like" but offers Jews Dihimi status with no voting rights and no civil rights. How interesting. The kettle is calling snow black.

18. Sarsour just proved Elon is right
Gili -- Canada
01/22/2007 01:29

Consider: Sarsour is saying that "Islam" is willing to normalize relations with Israel and offer those living in the west bank second-class citizenship without voting rights. That is actually a heck of a lot *more* then what they are currently offering (which is to exterminate all Jews). If pushing Elon's plan gets this kind of reaction then we should be all for it. Also, the Arabs are demanding a state free of Jews yet they call the Jews racist for asking for the same thing in the Jewish state

17. Good idea---the territory alone is worth the money, never mind ending the war
JJ
01/22/2007 01:23

However, it is a bad idea to talk about it if you are not going to do it.

16. Question?
Spencer -- Canada
01/22/2007 01:19

Can someone please answer this question.... Isn't the more serious demographic problem the number of Arabs within Green Line Israel who have full voting rights and who have a birthrate far higher than Jews? Arabs who live in the West Bank and GAza are separated by a wall, do not have voting rights and are not a real strategic threat as long as ISrael has a powerful military.... But Israeli Arabs could take over Israel legally without war simply through demographics?

15. Birthright should be paying Arabs to leave!
Sam Gorin -- usa
01/22/2007 01:19

Ive been saying it for ages, instead of telling Jews they have no future in the US, France, England or any other democratic country -- spend the money in a wiser function -- Pay the arabs to leave. Soursour thinks he and the arabs OWN Israel -- they are simply waiting for the Jews to get tired and leave, then move in. Only Olmert doesnt know Islam uses the Pal "issue" to destroy Judism -- Olmert still thinks its about "Land".

13. Better then nothing
Alex -- USA
01/22/2007 01:02

This plan is better than anything else "on the table". It is very humane, maybe even more humane than it should be. Non-voluntary transfer with compensation is even a better plan. History has proven many times that Arabs do not desire peace. A hostile population like that does not have moral justification to agree or disagree for transfer. Send them all out and compensate them for their property. The time for this idea to go mainstream has come.

11. Nothing wrong with this plan but...
Shel Zahav -- Israel
01/22/2007 00:35

There is nothing wrong with this plan if done voluntarily. It is a win-win situation. However, $50,000 per person isn't necessary; $20,000 per person will suffice to fund 100,000 emigres per year.

10. ARABS and MONEY
EGW -- canada
01/22/2007 00:23

Did Aviner REALLY say "ACCEPT SECOND CLASS CITIZENSHIP", or is this a bit of "press licence" to embellish and titilate??? I am a landed immigrant in Canada. I can't vote but am NOT in ANY way a "second class citizen". I have suggested for years that Yesha should form a "shadow" government complete with all the appurtenances, Defense, Justice, Health, Social, Immigration, etc. They have over 600,000 souls including Golan and East Jerusalem. there would be many immigrants, like Israel in 1948.

9. 80% of Palis polled said they would take $$ and run
Brooke
01/22/2007 00:10

Sarsour, your mad and rabid Jew hating is contributing to Arab's notorious history revisionism. So this plan is like the Nazi's, huh?? When the Nazi's transferred the Jews to the gas chambers? When the Nazis stole billions $$ from the Jews and still have not returned the loot? Well yes I am slowly seeing your comparisons. Maybe you are right and we should make sure you are. So let's start tattooing!Polled Palis, 80%, said they would take the money and run. Get lost, you animal!

7. Transfer-for-cash, one objection
Tracy W
01/21/2007 23:41

Although I absolutely agree with this idea, my objection concerns the second-class citizenship designation. 1) It would result in non-ending criticism both inside Israel and abroad. 2) Future Israeli governments might bend under pressure and restore their citizenship 3) Arab parents may swear loyalty, but what about future generations? 4) The Arab population would continue to increase creating an impossible situation when they become a majority in a few decades (apartheid?).

6. Economic incentives to help Palestinian Muslims relocate is an ethical and humane way to solve the Mideast conflict and concretize regional stability
AV
01/21/2007 23:39

Economic incentives to help Palestinian Muslims relocate, is an ethical and humane way to solve the Mideast conflict and concretize regional stability.

5. Sarsour EXTREME Hypocracy
Steve
01/21/2007 23:28

An arab MK explaining in perfect clarity that arabs would NEVER allow jews to vote in their countries. So why should we allow arabs to vote. EXPEL THEM.

4. Funding Arab Re-settlement
Tracy
01/21/2007 23:27

The idea of giving cash to Israeli Arabs to resettle elsewhere is excellent. It should be expanded to the Palestinian Arabs as well, by using the huge funds from international donors that end up in the pockets of corrupt leaders or in the purchase of weapons instead of helping Arab families.

3. PLEASE PRINT THIS ! I LOVE THIS PLAN !!!!!! BUT--------
Brooke -- Canada
01/21/2007 22:57

Finally a REAL and FAIR solution !have been advocating for a long time. However, Canada is not the place to send them. France loves them as does Cuba, Venezueala, N> Korea and Russia. And all of their Arab brethern countries. The West does not need their Jihad and anti-semetism, thank you very much. I love Israel and the West. Send them to countries that meet their true political natures- not to the West that is naive and still labors under the cruel weight and false lies of multi-culturalism

2. Pay As You Go
Moshe -- USA
01/21/2007 22:52

Payment of $50,000 to 100,000 per individual to leave the UN camps for other countries is much more humane than receiving UN hand outs and languishing in poverty and humiliation. In addition, it would remove a source of terrorism against Israel. This is a wonderful idea. But it won't work, because Israel's neighbors will not let it work. For example, the refugees could be encouraged to return as illegals and to carry out acts of terrorism.

1. This was Michael Kleiner's plan
Yoni -- Israel
01/21/2007 22:23

Wasn't this the Herut party's plan in the last Knesset? At least give credit where its due.

Contact Avodah at Avodah15@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

THE POLITICAL POLICE IN ISRAEL
Posted by Aryeh Zelasko, January 21, 2007.

All oppressive regimes fear their people. As a result the Police are generally divided into two types: the Criminal Police and the Political Police. The function of the Criminal Police is the usual business of law and order. The Political Police focus on "enemies of the State." The existence of a Political Police in Israel is nothing new and this has been around since the pre-State days of the Jewish Agency.

This is called "Israel Runs Secret Unit To Monitor Withdrawal Opposition," and is archived on IMRA
(http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=32550). Contact IMRA at imra@netvision.net.il It was published today on
www.israeljustice.com/news2.asp?key=31

JERUSALEM -- Israel's domestic security agency has been operating a secret unit designed to monitor and infiltrate opposition to the government's withdrawal policy from the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The secret unit was established in February 2005 as the government prepared for the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank and the expulsion of 16,000 Jews. Officials said the Israel Security Agency unit, authorized to infiltrate protest groups, was also designed to monitor the Internet.

"There will be attorneys in every relevant district, and they can accompany the investigations and provide immediate advice to the police because of the sensitivity involved in the realm of expression," Shai Nitzan, deputy state prosecutor for special operations, said.

Nearly two years later, the government and some panel members have refused to acknowledge the ISA unit. But Knesset member Michael Eitan, former chairman of the Constitution and Law Committee, said the unit continues to operate, although without parliamentary oversight.

"This was an intelligence unit," Eitan told Israeljustice.com in mid-January 2007. "What's it our business to oversee this?"

The secret intelligence unit was discussed in a closed emergency session of the Knesset Constitution and Law Committee on March 1, 2005. A transcript of the hearing was recently obtained by Israeljustice.com.

"The government conducted a meeting and has made a decision to establish a special unit in the Justice Ministry," Eitan told the committee during the emergency session.

Officials said Nitzan has headed the secret ISA unit under the jurisdiction of the Justice Ministry. They said Nitzan reports to Attorney General Menachem Mazuz and the unidentified legal adviser of the ISA. Neither the ISA nor the Justice Ministry agreed to discuss the special unit. Several officials became agitated when asked about the functions of the ISA unit.

"No, no and no," Justice Ministry spokesman Moshe Cohen told Israeljustice.com.

During the March 2005 session, Nitzan and other officials provided details of the secret intelligence unit. They said the unit was meant to determine whether dissent or civil disobedience constituted incitement or sedition, punishable by five years under Israeli law.

"We are very sensitive to crimes called 'crimes of expression,'" the ISA legal adviser said. "The treatment is different to that of other crimes because there is a thin line between freedom of expression and criminal acts. These include incitement to violence, incitement to racism and incitement to draft evasion."

Over the last year, about 700 people were indicted in connection with the protest campaign against the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank, officials said. Several of the indictments pertained to newspaper articles or letters critical of officials who directed the withdrawal.

Officials said the prosecution has handled what they termed clear cases of incitment or sedition. They said the new ISA unit was reserved for what one official termed "clandestine matters."

The intelligence unit was also granted extensive powers, officials said. This included the use of agents to infiltrate the anti-withdrawal movement, comprised mostly of Jewish teenagers.

"We call them live sources," the ISA legal adviser said of the agents. "This is no secret, and if it is a secret, I'm revealing that we operate live sources to collect information in problematic situations."

During the hearing, the intelligence official acknowledged the unauthorized use of an agent-provocateur to incite the man who eventually assassinated then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995. The official said the agency has "come a long way" since ISA handled the agent, Avishai Raviv.

The legal adviser said ISA has been cooperating with the Justice Ministry and the attorney general in the use of agents against Jewish dissidents. He said the agency also operated a so-called Jewish division, which monitored those deemed Jewish extremists.

For his part, Nitzan told the Knesset session that the ISA unit was meant to help authorities block the rise in anti-withdrawal protests. He said the state prosecutor drafted guidelines to confront incitement and sedition.

"The prosecutor's office is already overloaded," Nitzan said. "As a result, there are cases that it is important to deal with quickly to send a message to prevent additional violations of the law. We've also asked for more judges."

During the session, several committee members expressed concern over the new unit. Knesset member Yuli Edelstein, imprisoned in the 1980s as a Jewish dissident in the Soviet Union, said he was worried by the ISA use of agent-provocateurs, employed widely in totalitarian countries.

"The angle that really worries me is the activity of the agents," Edelstein said. "We need to supervise the Justice Ministry."

Other committee members expressed concern over the authority of the secret intelligence unit to comb the media and Internet sites for dissent. Knesset member Yitzhak Levy said this was unprecedented in Israel.

"Justice Minister Tzipi Livni said the unit will go through newspapers every day and try to spot [negative] remarks," Levy said. "It seems that we are speaking about an activism that is above and beyond what is usually discussed."

Today, several of the committee members said they no longer receive updates regarding the ISA unit. But attorneys who represent anti-withdrawal activists said the unit's activities were adopted by other agencies in the law enforcement community.

"People in the police are doing this," Yitzhak Klein, director of the Jerusalem-based Israel Policy Center said. "They have a computer crimes section and they are looking for incriminating material and there is some evidence that these cases are run through Mazuz himself. It's possible that we see here one of the outcomes of the special unit."

Knesset committee members said Eitan was the sole liaison between Israeli authorities and parliament concerning the government campaign against anti withdrawal opponents. But even during the 2005 hearing Eitan doubted whether parliament could maintain oversight over the ISA unit.

"There are gray areas like everything in life, but the Justice Ministry is on top of things," Eitan said. "It could be that we in the Knesset need to supervise the Justice Ministry and receive information. But even then, there will be things that are not right. What can we do? Should we get rid of these operations that we know we need?"

Aryeh Zelasko lives in Beitar Illit, south of Jerusalem. He is Director of Sales and Marketing of Israel Visit (www.israelvisit.co.il) which provides information and an internet buying facility for American visitors to Israel.

To Go To Top

LEFTIST PROFESSOR DENOUNCES THE PRO-TERROR TREASON AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 21, 2007.

Professor Amnon Rubinstein from Meretz Denounces the Treason at Tel Aviv University

Prof. Amnon Rubinstein is an interesting guy. These days he is the closest thing to a leftist patriot in Israel, and I say that as someone who maintains that in Israel "leftist patriot" is generally an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms.

Rubinstein's bio reads like a political novel (see a version of it at
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/rubinstein.html). For years he served as professor at constitutional law at the Tel Aviv University (TAU) Law School. Rubinstein was one of the founders of that law school and its very first dean. In the 1970s he was one of the founders and leaders of the "old" Shinui party, not to be confused with the centrist Orthodox-baiting party with the same name run later by Joseph "Tommy" Lapid. That older Shinui merged with others, including some Marxists from MAPAM, to form the MERETZ party in 1992. MERETZ, of course, was a leftwing capitulationist party, and in large part it was responsible for creating (with its Labor Party coalition partners) the entire Oslo debacle. Within Meretz, Rubinstein and his faction formed a remarkable freer-market cadre, one fighting internally against the Marxists over economic and social issues. Indeed, Rubinstein's Meretz faction was the closest thing in Israel back then to advocates of true market economics.

Altogether Rubinstein sat in the Knesset for 25 years. He served for a while as Minister of Education, and as such promoted experiments in public school choice and vouchers. He was one of the senior professors in Israel who jabbed their fingers in the eye of the country's Ivory Cartel, the Council on Higher Education, defying the council in setting up the first private-sector law school and university in Israel, the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, where Rubinstein continues to teach.

While I am not suggesting that Rubinstein be granted moral clemency for his personal role in imposing the Oslo fiasco on the country, he is nevertheless a combative Zionist. He is one of the few people in Israel for whom "leftist Zionism" really still exists. And he has been one of the leading crusaders in Israel against Israel's Academic Fifth Column (see
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1132053860765& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull).

While Rubinstein still holds to many of his dovish positions, he despises "Post-Zionists" and New Historians, people like Ilan Pappe, Oren Yiftachel, Neve Gordon, and their ilk. Rubinstein regards such people as traitors and often says so. He writes a weekly column in Maariv in which attacks on academic extremists are a recurring and frequent theme. He and Ben-Dror Yemini, who is also Left of Center, have emerged as the two best commentators on Israeli academic sedition in the Israeli mainstream media.

Rubinstein is particularly effective because of the fact that he himself is a bona fide member of the Oslo Left; hence when he attacks academic radicals his criticism is all the more devastating. Curmudgeons such as myself are understood to be anti-Oslo and anti-Left regarding just about everything, and so no criticism by us can make any impression on the leftwing anti-Zionist radicals. But Rubinstein and Yemini draw blood every time they attack, and they are critics whom the Post-Zionists cannot ignore and dismiss.

On January 12, 07, Ben Dror Yemini (deputy editor of Maariv) devoted an entire full page in Maariv to a pro-terror "academic" event held at Tel Aviv University, sponsored by its law school. Yemini began his column by pointing out that "rights discourse" is today little more than a weapon being used by Israel's enemies and by the enemies of human freedom to destroy Israel. He mocks "progressives" who rationalize the murderous behavior of terrorists as part of "understanding the Other" and being sensitive.

He then notes that a few weeks ago, a group of leftist anti-Zionists on the faculty of Tel Aviv University, of which there are ever so many, conducted an "academic conference" dedicated to the idea that imprisoned Palestinian mass murderers and terrorists are in fact "political prisoners", deserving of sympathy and support. The Tel Aviv University law school contains a large number of anti-Israel radical leftists. A Palestinian who blows up a pregnant mother with her toddlers is nothing more than a political protester, protesting occupation, in the "minds" of such people. Yemini's column was a blistering attack on the participants and sponsors of that "conference".

Restrictions on misuses of academic freedom, such as what was on display in the pro-terror conference at Tel Aviv University, are, wrote Yemini, no different from restrictions on Holocaust Denial. That is because Holocaust Denial is not an academic nor scholarly theory at all but merely a political weapon of hate. But so is "academizing" terror and mass murder. So any "conference", such as the pro-terror one held at Tel Aviv University law school, is little more than an attempt at promoting the anti-Semitic agenda, writes Yemini. He then asks rhetorically why Tel Aviv University does not conduct Holocaust Denial conferences in the name of "academic freedom," or a conference for those advocating genocide of Jews.

Yemini's column was followed in Maariv a week later by an even more devastating attack on the Tel Aviv University Left, written by Amnon Rubinstein. Prof. Rubinstein's entire column was an attack on that same pro-terror conference, hosted by the very same law school in which Rubinstein had taught for many years. His column is entitled "Terrorists on the Faculty". He begins his column by noting that initially every single participant in that "conference" was a leftist, most of them openly radical and anti-Israel, but when public criticism was triggered once the event was advertised, a few token non-extremists were added as speakers.

Nevertheless, there was nothing at all academic about this "conference", writes Rubinstein. No research, no scholarship, no real debate, simply anti-Israel political advocacy. It was an event more befitting a beer hall than a university, he adds (perhaps one in Munich? -- SP). It was simply an example of on-campus anti-Israel political indoctrination, of the sort that takes place every week on Israeli campuses. Campus conferences sponsored by the social sciences, writes Rubinstein, almost never allow any expression for the points of view held by the vast majority of Israelis (meaning Zionism and patriotism).

At the Tel Aviv University law school pro-terror conference, the speaker there receiving the greatest applause was Tali Fahima, notes Rubinstein, a pro-terror extremist Jewish woman recently released from prison, where she had been held for assisting her Palestinian terrorist boyfriend plan terror attacks. Another featured speaker at the Tel Aviv University event was a Palestinian terrorist who had been imprisoned for his crimes by Israel for 27 years, including for throwing a Molotov cocktail at a civilian bus. Rubinstein adds bitterly that the people who run the TAU law school never even considered balancing these terrorists with an invitation to a victim of Palestinian terror to sit at the conference podium. At Tel Aviv University, murderers and terrorists of Jews considered entitled to "civil rights", but not Jewish civilians.

The TAU conference also included a long session on the administrative problems faced by Palestinians seeking to visit imprisoned terrorist family members, writes Rubinstein, while not a word was said about the kidnapped Israelis being held by terrorists. But if you think the TAU law school would conduct a conference on the violation of the human rights of families of Jews murdered by those same terrorists, you would make me laugh, adds Rubinstein.

Rubinstein joins Yemini in claiming that there is no difference between this seditious pro-terror "academic" conference conducted at Tel Aviv University (on facilities financed by the very same Israeli taxpayers whom these radical professors want to see murdered --- SP) and a conference promoting Holocaust Denial or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The law school at Tel Aviv University is hardly the only campus center there in which anti-Israel sedition and "Post-Zionism" dominate. There are entire departments at the university in which every single faculty member (or nearly every one) is an anti-Israel radical leftist. Courses consisting of in-classroom anti-Israel indoctrination are conducted there. For more information on sedition and radicalism at Tel Aviv University, go to the web site www.israel-academia-monitor.com, operated by "Israel Academia Monitor", Israel's cousin to "Campus Watch", operated by Dr. Daniel Pipes in the US.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

THE POWER OF HATE
Posted by Avodah, January 20, 2007.

Daniel Pinner is a veteran immigrant from England, a teacher and an electrician by profession; a Torah scholar who has been active in causes promoting Eretz Israel and Torat Israel.

This is a commentary on Vayeira by Daniel Pinner. His ideas are compelling, partiularly considering that the Israeli Government jailed him even though they know he was blameless. He shot a gun into the air when he was attacked by some 50 rock-throwing Arabs, until they backed off. He was accused of injuring one of them -- even though the "wounded" arab changed his claim several times (the shot was in the leg, no, the chest) and the arabs gave contradictory testimony.

This essay appeared January 18, 2007 in Arutz-Sheva
(www.IsraelNationalNews.com/article.php3?id=6858).

"And Hashem said to Moses: 'Say to Aaron: Take your staff and stretch forth your hand over the waters of Egypt, and they will become blood, and the Egyptian sorcerers did the same with their black magic,'" (Exodus 7:19).

This is a remarkable comment on the power of hate. The previous day, Moses and Aaron had stood before Pharoah and his sorcerers. Aaron had cast down his staff and it turned into a snake. The Egyptian sorcerers then matched that miracle with their sorcery.

True, Aaron's snakes swallowed all the sorcerer's snakes foretelling that Hashem's miracles would inevitably overpower black magic from impure sources. But nonetheless, they succeeded in reassuring Pharoah that Egyptian magic could protect him.

When Aaron and Moses brought the plague of blood on Egypt, those sorcerers again duplicated the miracle using their own black magic, demonstrating to Pharoah that they were a match for Hashem, the G-d of the Hebrews.

Surely it would have been more sensible for them to turn the blood back into water! But instead, they took what little water they had (according to Targum Yonatan they took water from Goshen; according to the Or HaChaim, they dug for subterranean water), and turned that into blood. So important was it for them to prove that Moses and Aaron did not have special powers, they were willing to add to the plague.

With the second plague too, the Egyptian sorcerers displayed the same characteristic. "Aaron stretched forth his hand over the waters of Egypt, and the frogs came up and covered the Land of Egypt. And the sorcerers did the same with their black magic, bringing up frogs onto the Land of Egypt," (8:3). Again, instead of trying to eliminate the frogs, they brought up even more frogs -- purely in order to prove that their magic could match that of Moses and Aaron.

With the third plague, that of lice, the sorcerers tried again to do the same: "Aaron stretched forth his staff and struck the dust of Egypt; it became lice, on man and beast. All the dust of Egypt became lice throughout the Land of Egypt. And the sorcerers did the same with their black magic, to bring forth lice, but they were unable to," (8:13-14).

It was then that the sorcerers confessed to Pharoah "this is the finger of G-d," (8:15). But at no stage did the sorcerers try to alleviate the Egyptian's suffering.

This seems to have been a consistent Egyptian characteristic. More than 80 years earlier, a previous Pharoah had made the infamous decree. "When you deliver the Hebrew women and you see the birth stones, if it is a boy, you will kill him, and if it is a girl she will live," (1:16). When this evil scheme failed because the midwives refused to collaborate, Pharoah commanded his entire nation [not just the Jews] saying, "Every son who is born [not just the Jewish boys] you will throw into the river; and every daughter you will save alive,"(1:22).

The Midrash explains his rationale. "The astrologist told him, 'The mother of the savior of Israel has become pregnant, but we don not know if it will be an Israelite or an Egyptian,'" (Exodus Raba 1:18, and compare Targum Yonatan to Exodus 1:22).

With hindsight, we understand their uncertainty. Moses was both an Israelite and an Egyptian prince. But the practical result was that in his attempt to frustrate the Israelites' salvation, Pharoah was willing to perpetrate mass murder even against the sons of his own people.

As the plagues progressed Pharoah persisted in his attempt to destroy the Israelites, even as he knew that he would destroy his own nation in the process. By the eighth plague, that of locusts, Pharoah's servants could already see the writing on the wall.

Pharoah's servants said to him, "Until when will he be a snare unto us? Send away the people so they will serve Hashem their G-d. Do you not know that Egypt is destroyed?!" (10:7).

In his desperate fight against Israel, Pharoah ultimately plunged himself and his army into the Red Sea, leaving them to their own destruction.

And this set a precedent for all our enemies. A few weeks later, we encountered Amalek in the desert, in Rephidim. The Torah gives a fascinating insight into that encounter, and the nature of Amalek. "As it happened that when Moses would raise his hands, Israel would prevail..." (17:11). And the obvious question is: When Israel prevailed -- as they eventually did when Aaron and Hur held Moses's hands up -- why did Amalek not simply break off contact?

After all Amalek was in the desert far from their settled homeland. They had nothing material to fight for. Evidently, this was yet another example of the enemies of Israel being willing to doom themselves in order to fight against us.

Pharoah and the Egyptians managed to inflict horrendous damage on us before they were finally destroyed; so to our enemies in our own days. But the historical lesson is clear. An enemy so consumed by hate that he is willing to destroy himself to kill a few more Jews, is an enemy whose defeat and utter desolation we will ultimately celebrate.

"So too may all Your enemies be destroyed O' Hashem, and those who love Him will be as powerful as a rising sun," (Judges 5:31).

Contact Avodah at Avodah15@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

ROOT CAUSES OF ANTI-US ISLAMIC TERRORISM (PART 3)
Posted by January Yoram Ettinger, January 20, 2007.

Enclosed you'll find the 201st issue of "Straight From The Jerusalem Cloakroom", which exposes the superficiality of the claim that the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Palestinian issue or the US-Israel win-win relations have been a core cause of Islamic terrorism.

Should you wish to examine previous issues and OpEds, please visit The Ettinger Report at http://yoramettinger.newsnet.co.il.

Enjoy it and may we elect leaders, who are endowed with the leadership tenets of Moses (who features in last week's portion of the Torah (Va'Erah): Humility, Compassion, Faith, Long-Term Vision and Determination in face of adversity. Yoram

Below is Straight From The Jerusalem Cloakroom #201, January 21, 2007

While the US and European foreign policy establishments have contended that the core of the 13-century-old Islamic terrorism and Middle East violence is the less-than-a-century-old Palestinian issue...

1. ISLAMIC TERRORISM HAS BEEN A MIDEAST FIXTURE since the seventh century, when three of the first four Caliphs, succeeding the Prophet Muhammad, were murdered by political rivals: Umar ibn Abd al-Khattab (644AD), Uthman Ibn Affan (656AD) and Ali ibn Abi Talib (661AD). It has afflicted the Arab Mideast regionally and domestically. Prof. P.J. Vatikiotis, London University, who was a world renowned authority on Mideast history: "One cannot separate, in the Mideast, international terrorism from domestic terrorism. One cannot condemn the one without condemning the other, nor can one combat the one without combating the other." ("Terrorism: How The West Can Win", 1986, p. 83).

2. ANTI-WESTERN ISLAMIC TERRORISM dates back to the basic Muslim legal/theological view of the struggle between the Abode of Islam (Dar A-Salam) against the Abode of War-Sword-Infidels (Dar al-Kharb). It aims at bringing the globe under Islamic dominion. In October 732AD, the Muslim forces of Abd Al-Rahman fought -- and lost to Charles Martel, "The Hammer" -- 200 miles south of Paris, in an attempt to realize the goal of Islam. Today, Arab/Muslim societies invoke Quranic verses and Islamic history precedents as guidelines for daily (especially national) conduct. Contemporary rogue Muslim regimes pursue Islam's historical goal through terrorism, via the acquisition of nuclear and other non-conventional capabilities and by demographic expansion in western democracies of Dar al-Kharb.

3. THE USA IS PERCEIVED AS THE "BIG SATAN" by Mideast Arab regimes due to its role as the leader of the Western infidel world, Dar al-Kharb. The US is the most effective hurdle, which has tackled Islamic terrorism and expansionist aspirations by rogue Muslim regimes (Iran, Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc.). US democracy of Life-Liberty- Pursuit of Happiness, free minds/markets, tolerance and freedom of expression/religion/association/media constitute a clear and present danger to all Arab/Muslim regimes (Turkey excepted). They would be replaced, summarily, once US democracy is implemented in their midst.

4. SCAPEGOATISM HAS TARGETED THE USA, the West and the Jewish State as scapegoats for Arab/Muslim frustration, humiliation and rage over the failure to reclaim the splendor of ancient Islamic dominance.

5. ISRAEL IS DEPICTED, by Arab/Muslim establishments AS A DAGGER OF THE WEST, as an outpost of the US, "an agent of US imperialism", as the "Little Satan."

6. "A NIHILISTIC CULT OF DEATH ARE TRAITS THAT NAZIS, FASCISTS AND ISLAMISTS share completely in common. The morbid addiction to destruction and revenge drives them to paint the world red with blood in their mad rush to introduce utopia in the here-and-now... Whether millions die in the attempt is irrelevant... Arab unity would remain a dream without sacrifice, conflict martyrdom and bloodshed... (Prof. Wistrich of the Hebrew University, "National Interest", Summer 2003).

7. IRRESPECTIVE OF ISRAEL'S EXISTENCE AND THE PALESTINIAN ISSUE, Islamic terrorism has recently plagued Australia, Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Russia, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Mauritania, Nigeria, Turkey, Scandinavia, Holland, France, England, Spain, the US, etc.

8. INDEPENDENT OF ISRAEL'S POLICIES AND THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT, Muslim terrorists were arrested in England before blowing up civilian aircraft over the Atlantic (Aug. 2006), 3 Muslim terrorists were seized for planning to blow up two German trains (Aug. 2006), Muslim terrorists murdered 209 Indians in Mumbai (July 2006), Muslim terrorists were apprehended in Canada for attempting to blow up major Toronto buildings (June 2006), Muslim terrorists were jailed for trying to blow up an Australian nuclear power station (Nov. 2005), 65 Indians murdered in New Delhi (Oct. 2005), etc.

9. A MESSAGE TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT FROM PROF. FOUAD AJAMI, of Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies: "No American diplomatic scheme would spare America the fury of those bent upon eradicating its presence in the region. It is a false reading of a large civilization to say that the terror springs from the impasse between Israelis and Palestinians... It springs from deeper social, economic and political pressures within Mideast society, from the traumas of dislocated newly urbanized youth...Some of it is hatched by merciless men for whom terror is a profession that pays... It does not advance peace between Israelis and Palestinians to pretend that it would solve a problem much larger than their conflict..." (NY Times, April 17, 1986).

Ambassador Yoram Ettinger is a consultant on US-Israel relations as well as the Chairman of Special Projects at the Ariel Center for Policy Research. Formerly the Minister for Congressional Affairs to Israel's Embassy in Washington, DC, Ettinger also served as Consul General of Israel to the Southwestern US. He is a former editor of Contemporary Mideast Backgrounder, and is the author of the Jerusalem Cloakroom series of reports. Contact him at yoramtex@netvision.net.il

To Go To Top

HIZBALLAH...WHO?
Posted by Freify, January 20, 2007.

You were expecting ...maybe...peace????

DEBKAfile Exclusive: Hizballah puts a tight rein on UN peacekeepers' movements and policing operations in S. Lebanon -- with threats to their safety

The Shiite terrorist group last week set up military checkpoints and roadblocks to keep UN troops off the main roads connecting the Lebanese-Israeli border to Shiite villages and small towns in the south. Hizballah warned UN commanders that monitors flouting Hizballah's injunctions and conducting searches would be fired on.

These restrictions box the international force, expanded by the Security Council last August to keep the whole of S. Lebanon free of armed men except for the Lebanese army, into a narrow border strip. Hizballah has again manned its pre-war border positions -- albeit by unarmed operatives -- and their yellow flags are flying from their roofs. But most dangerously, Hizballah has moved most of its weapons stockpiles into the blocked villages in breach of the ceasefire rules and is anxious to keep them out of sight of UN monitors.

Having beaten UNIFIL into a corner, Hizballah leader Hassan Nasralllah celebrated the resignation of Israeli chief of staff Lt. General Dan Halutz as proof of his strategic victory in the Lebanon conflict of summer 2006. In a speech Friday, Jan 19, he crowed that Ehud Olmert and Amir Peretz would be next to go. The speech was pre-taped, as are all Nasrallah's public appearances since last year, in view of his status as an internationally wanted terrorist.

DEBKAfile's military sources report that the episode Thursday, Jan 18, when Lebanese "villagers" from Zaoutar north of the Litani drove away Spanish UNIFIL members, was in fact the first time Hizballah had publicly turned the screw on the international peacekeepers. The Lebanese group has acted in advance of the arrival of the new Italian UNIFIL commander in Lebanon, Maj. Gen. Claudio Graziano, who takes over from Maj. Gen. Alain Pellegrini. He is expected to be a lot tougher about keeping Hizballah in line with the ceasefire conditions than Pellegrini who, the Shiite group found to be a soft touch.

DEBKAfile's political sources note that all of Hizballah's breaches and its advance ever closer to the border have evoked no Israeli response, whether diplomatic or military. This is causing deep concern in Israel's northern border towns and villages.

Contact freify at freify@netvision.net.il

To Go To Top

HEY BORAT...GUESS WHAT?
Posted by Gerald A. Honigman, January 20, 2007.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Arafat' slicker Fatah comrade, President Mahmoud Abbas, on January 14th and promised that she has heard Arab demands for a stronger American hand to guide peace efforts with Israel. An Associated Press report quoted her on January 15th as stating, "I have heard loud and clear...You will have my commitment to do precisely that."

In other words, it's throw the Jew down the well time again.

Think about it...

What people or nation would be pressured to negotiate with enemies still dedicated to their destruction ?

Not many, right? Although Kurds come to mind also.

Condi's crew now expects Kurds--who have been subjugated and murdered by the hundreds of thousands by Arabs over the last century--to supply fighters to help keep Arabs of different stripes from blowing each other apart to the south in the name of the artificial, failed, Yugoslavian-type state known as Iraq.

It makes no difference that neither variation of Arabs--in their own words--have any intention to treat fellow Muslim but non-Arab Kurds as equals.

Arab nationalism has--and always will--win out over an inherently flawed, synthetic Iraqi nationalism, and if the Kurds don't play ball, the Shi'a in Iraq will eventually do to them what the Sunni have repeatedly done after the Islamic Republic of (Arab) Iraq is set up upon America's withdrawal. Just look to the east. Kurds have repeatedly been massacred there in the name of Shi'a Iranian nationalism. And Arabs see most, if not all, of this region as "purely Arab patrimony."

Back to the well...

Condi & Co. are inflating the Road Crap-er Map-balloon again.

Many others have already commented on Abbas' recent statements calling on Hamas and Fatah to stop killing each other and to turn their guns once again on Jews. And Condi and the Foggy Folks act as if they're deaf, dumb, and blind. Indeed, she's now planning to supply additional scores of millions of dollars in arms to her buddy Abbas.

But, fear not... there will be "assurances." Like those she gave on television about Hizbullah being disarmed in Lebanon last summer, during "phase two" of the cease fire.

Right...And I'm the Passover Bunny.

Recall that Abbas won his own "moderate" presidency running on a platform calling for Israel's destruction (but by more acceptable means), and all his government agencies, maps, schools, media, etc. and so forth depict the Arabs' 22nd state, "Palestine," taking the place of--not living side-by-side with--Israel. All of this and more are well known. At least Hamas is honest about its murderous, rejectionist intentions.

But, never mind...

Abbas and Fatah--whose constitution still doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist, no matter what their worldwide whitewashers say--are the Jews' State Department-designated "peace" (of the grave) partners.

State--with approval from the White House--has repeatedly pressured Israel to unilaterally cave in to Arab demands.

Not long before Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had his horrendous stroke, as just one of many earlier examples, reports told of Condi screaming at Israeli officials at Sharon's ranch. Such things as removing checkpoints (that America now finds necessary itself in Iraq to cut down on terror); the Jews, themselves, supplying Arab disembowelers of their kids with arms; returning to the 1949 suicidal armistice lines; making Judea Judenrein; etc. and so forth are usually high on such agendas.

The title of that January 15th article mentioned above read, "Secretary of State Says She's Heard Abbas' Demand."

Where's the leaders who will put forth Israel's demands?

Who will unabashedly state to Abbas that Israel will not negotiate with any enemy until it openly acknowledges to the world and to its own people in their own language that it accepts Israel's right to exist.

Who will look the Arabs in their eyes and state that if they can have some two dozen states created by the conquest and forced Arabization of mostly other non-Arab peoples' lands, then Jews can have a resurrected state in the land where their ancestors have had a continuous existence for over three millennia.

Can Condi's boss say that about his ranch in Texas? Ask the Mexicans...

Where's the Israeli leader who will tell its best friend, America, that if it can have national security interests which necessitate that it acquire territories, topple governments, and meddle thousands of miles away from home, then it needs to understand that a miniscule Israel needs something more to increase its own security than empty promises and unfulfilled obligations from Arabs still sworn to its destruction.

America would not yield to such an enemy under such circumstances, and it is three thousand miles wide, has mostly friendly neighbors (despite conquering massive territories from at least one), has two oceans helping to act as a buffer, has three hundred million people, and is the most powerful nation on Earth.

Until Israel gets itself leaders willing to take a cut in American aid and such if the price is a Munich-style "peace" with Jews as the sacrificial offering, it should not agree to attend any proposed new Road Map summit that is now being planned.

It will only wind up being throw the Jew down the well time again.

Gerald A. Honigman, a Florida educator, has created and conducted counter-Arab propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has publicly debated Arab spokesmen. His articles and op-eds have been published in both the print media and on websites. Contact him at honigman6@msn.com or go to his website: http://geraldahonigman.com/blog.php

To Go To Top

OLMERT'S HEIRS APPARENT
Posted by Women in Green, January 20, 2007.

This was written by Caroline Glick and it appeared in the Jerusalem Post January 16, 2007.

Ehud Olmert's Kadima Party is on the skids. The weekend opinion polls showed that if elections were held today, the Likud would win 29 Knesset seats while Kadima, which now controls the government with 29 seats, would fall to 12 seats. But elections are anything but a foregone conclusion, and if his colleagues have their way, his political destruction will not bring about elections but simply pave the way for their ascension to power, just as Ariel Sharon's massive stroke paved Olmert's path to the premiership.

Indeed, this week Olmert's two principal deputies, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Strategic Affairs Minister Avigdor Lieberman, were veritably basking in the heat of his political infernos. Both used their photo-ops with visiting US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to present themselves to the Israeli public as Olmert's rightful heirs -- the leaders with the big ideas and the international cachet that we can turn to in our hour of need.

On the face of it, Livni is best positioned to seize the reins of leadership. If Olmert is forced out of office, as vice premier Livni is legally the next in line. And as the inevitability of Olmert's political demise has sunken in, supported by much of the local media, Livni has been priming the public to accept her as Olmert's replacement. The media constantly reminds us that unlike many of her party and coalition colleagues, Livni is not suspected of having committed any criminal felonies and so, we are led to believe, we should be relieved to have her in charge. Her 51-percent job approval rating versus Olmert's 14-percent approval rating indicates that the public has bought this line of thinking.

BUT DO we really want her to lead us? In Livni's press appearance with Rice Saturday night she was asked whether she supports moving ahead with Palestinian statehood before the Palestinians end their involvement in terrorism, in contravention of the principal guideline of the US-backed road map peace plan. Livni's response illustrated at once her unique rhetorical skills and the unmatched analytical acumen she brings to bear today as Israel's chief diplomat.

In her words, "And but yes, I do and I was not talking about jumping or skipping or bypassing some of the phases of the road map, but I do believe that talking with the Palestinians today what are the best steps that we can take and maybe to make some visions or some -- what we say the political horizon more concrete if this can help, so this is something that we have to do. But there's a difference and we can distinguish talking with the Palestinians and implementing parts one before the other, and I believe that this is the difference maybe and maybe the kind of misunderstanding that was in the understanding of talking or implementing the phases in a different order."

It is not simply that this statement is garbled to the point of incoherence. It is not simply that Livni uses phrases and watchwords like "some visions" and "political horizons" and "misunderstanding that was in the understanding" in an attempt to cover up cognitive foolishness and disconnect from reality.

There is the pretension of know-it-all snobbery running through this -- and indeed every statement that Livni makes -- which demonstrates that Livni is altogether convinced that her grand designs for Palestinian statehood are so grand and designer that she will never allow the reality of the total Palestinian commitment to Israel's destruction to disturb her.

INDEED TWO days before Livni made this incomprehensible statement, Fatah terror organization and Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas, on whom she pins all her hopes, told a rally in Ramallah that the "moderate" Palestinians in Fatah must understand that it is their job was to continue to kill Israelis. In his words, "We will not give up our principles and we have said that rifles should be directed against the occupation."

Saturday night's question to Livni about her view of the road map was a reasonable one. Late last month she outlined her vision for Israel's future in an interview with Haaretz. There she expressed her total commitment to establishing a Palestinian state as soon as possible. In her view, establishing a Palestinian state is a much more important priority for Israel than neutralizing the burgeoning Iranian nuclear threat to Israel. And to this end, she broadly intimated, she believes that it is in Israel's interest to hand Judea and Samaria over to Hamas and Fatah after first ethnically cleansing the areas of all Jewish presence.

And, by Livni's telling, this massive empowerment of terrorists and evisceration of Israeli societal cohesion would be nothing more than a first move toward the ultimate settlement of the Palestinian conflict with Israel. A final settlement would also include the ceding of parts of Jerusalem and facilitating the entry of millions of foreign-born Arabs dedicated to Israel's annihilation into the rump Palestinian terror state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza.

As to Iran, Livni sees no real reason for concern. She insists that due to her diplomatic brilliance, Israel won the war against Iran's Lebanese army Hizbullah last summer. Livni proclaims Israel's victory even as both the IDF and the US Director of National Intelligence and Rice's incoming deputy John Negroponte, have admitted that Hizbullah has rebuilt its forces to pre-war levels and is widely perceived as having won the war, to the detriment of Israel's strategic posture.

IN SPEAKING of Iran itself, Livni sounds more like a detached international relations professor sitting in Berkeley or Boston than the politician responsible for Israel's international relations. As she sees it, the biggest problem with Iran's nuclear weapons program is that it is liable to set off a regional arms race where lots of countries will try to get the bomb.

That is, her principal concern is not that Israel is first on Iran's list of declared targets for nuclear annihilation. That, she explains, is really beside the point. And anyway, it isn't Israel's problem -- it's the whole world's problem; and thanks to her, the whole world is unifying to stop Iran from getting the A-bomb.

BUT THEN, Livni wasn't the only cabinet minister pushing the notion of herself as Olmert's heir. Lieberman did too. Although the Likud has been leading in the polls for six months, Lieberman joined the government in early November to both prevent elections and so block the Likud's ascension to leadership, and to build his own credibility in a bid to replace the Likud with his Yisrael Beitenu party as the largest center-right party in Israeli politics.

Lieberman projects himself as the anti-Livni -- the sane voice in the government that will curb her radical leftist tendencies. But is this true? Is he a sane voice?

At the beginning of the month, Lieberman assailed Livni's plan to give the Palestinians a state before they renounce their plans to destroy Israel. But then he unveiled his big idea. Lieberman understands that Israel is a frontline state in the global jihad. But since this is a global jihad, he has determined that Israel's best bet is to join the European Union.

In his words, "Israel's diplomatic and security goal... must be clear: joining NATO and entering the European Union." In his photo-op with Rice, Lieberman expounded on his big idea that NATO and the EU will now take Israel under their wing. Israel, he said, must reoccupy Gaza to end its transformation into a new hub for global jihad. But after Israel invades Gaza, NATO should send 30,000 soldiers into Gaza to take over security from Israel.

Just as Livni, in advancing her idea of giving Judea and Samaria to Fatah and Hamas, ignores the fact that Fatah and Hamas are not interested in peace with Israel, so Lieberman in advancing his plan to subsume Israeli sovereignty into EU and NATO membership pays no attention to the nature of these groups. He ignores the fact that the central guiding principle of EU foreign policy is support for the Palestinians -- including Hamas -- in their bid to destroy Israel. And he seems to overlook the fact that US leadership of NATO did not prevent NATO members France, Belgium, Germany and Turkey from doing everything they could to prevent the US from defeating Saddam Hussein in 2003.

After ascending to his accidental premiership when Ariel Sharon was felled by his stroke last year, Olmert was able to win the elections last March by disguising his radical leftist and strategically stillborn plan to transfer Judea and Samaria to Fatah and Hamas as "pragmatism." In his efforts he was ably assisted by the media, which hid Gaza's post-withdrawal transformation into a base for global terrorism from the public.

So in their presentation of themselves as competent alternatives to Olmert, Livni and Lieberman are simply following in his footsteps. They know that if they offer policies to the public that deny the reality of war and so lead the public to believe that Israel does not have to fight that war, they will receive the support of the pacifist media and be well positioned to win the elections without ever having to actually defend their positions.

What becomes clear, then, is that if Israel is to emerge successfully from its real strategic challenges it needs to rid itself not only of Olmert, but of all his heirs apparent. For this to happen, his government must fall with him, and we must proceed to general elections.

Ruth and Nadia Matar established Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green), an activist group of women based in Jerusalem. Their website address is http://www.womeningreen.org

To Go To Top

TERRITORIAL INSTINCT
posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 20, 2007.

Has the territorial instinct, an evolutionary adaption ever so vital to animal, including intelligent animal a/k/a human, survival been abandoned by multitudes of Israelis, including current leaders, as well as friends of their beleaguered state? Has it been replaced by Blanche Du Bois' 'Streetcar Named Desire' pronouncement, "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers", in this case 'the kindness of hostile Jew despising neighbors'? Even Tennessee Williams would not likely have wished such a fatal concept to infect an ethnic group, especially one that has throughout its history been brutally persecuted, culminating in six million members butchered in 'The Holocaust', indeed the most sadistically systematic genocide ever perpetrated by one dysfunctional Darwinian species, convincingly supporting the safe-haven necessity of that territorial instinct. No kindred spirit subset of presumably intelligent beings, especially one profoundly attached to precious life on Earth, should so abandon its nature, yet many Jews and their presumed supporters alas apparently have.

We note 'prominent' citizens from Israel and Syria drafting a clandestine document calling for the return of the Golan Heights to Syria. What would tycoon investor Warren Buffet say to that give away, having recently invested billions of dollars in a presumably Israeli operated tool manufacturing company located in the Golan Heights? Would such a savvy entrepreneur have risked heavyweight capital in an Iranian influenced Syrian controlled enterprise? Would foreign investors ever broach Israel again, a nation willing to give away 'the farm' to hostile neighbors? Would they trust risk capital to a naive nation that so disrespects its future generations, ceding part of their birthright for the illusory promise of peace? Might they fear their investment property and ground beneath would also be ceded or subject to frequent attacks by emboldened aggressive predatory neighbors sensing a compliant bleeding nation on the ropes? Israel must not limit its growth potential by relinquishing claim to justly secured land conquered in battle. Period. All land so secured in 1967, including the Golan Heights, Judea, Samaria, and east Jerusalem, as a result of a failed attempt by hostile Arabs to annihilate the Jewish State, is now and should always be part of sovereign Israel. Period. This indeed is a territorial imperative etched into the genes of those human beings intent on surviving as a single prosperous nation and must not be violated! Yet, for so many perhaps well intentioned souls to feel otherwise suggests an insidious overriding self-defeating program, suppressing natural instinct, has taken over and if powerful enough will lead to catastrophic consequences for the State of Israel. The misapplied term 'occupation', abundantly used by mostly all media outlets, falsely defining the current scenario in Judea and Samaria where Israeli troops must protect Jewish citizens from their hostile Arab neighbors, within such justifiably secured land, has become so imbedded in the psyches of so many Israelis they tend to believe all the shameful connotations of the wretched lie. There can be no occupation of people when those people would be free to move about and develop unrestricted civilized lives but choose not to, instead allow violent members within their group the opportunity to threaten their peaceful neighbors. Thus, Israeli forces are obligated to set up barriers and check points restricting all Arab movement because of those belligerents, perhaps wearing homicide/suicide belts, uncontrolled by local Arab authorities. No doubt, Israeli citizens have every right to dwell in Judea and Samaria; must not be removed by Jew despising Arabs; nor, in fact, by politically naďve Jewish/Israeli leaders disengaged from those territorial instincts essential to the survival of the nation they were elected and selected to steward.

What is so bizarre about today's Israeli so-called Palestinian conflict is that in 2000, at Camp David, U.S. President Bill Clinton and Israel Prime Minister Ehud Barak were willing to cede almost all of the so-called West Bank, the Arab sector of Jerusalem, as well as the entire Gaza strip to autocrat Yasser Arafat, a potential 'Palestinian state' beyond the wildest dreams of most morphed Jordanians, and he refused the offer, opting instead for intifada. Of course, billionaire Yasser had everything to lose from this deal and consequential 'Allah forbid' peace with Israel, since such a settlement would likely eliminate the flow of euros to 'abused Palestinian refugees' as well as the substantial portion of those charitable contributions circuitously directed to The Bank of Arafat. No doubt, this sleazy Arab could not afford a cut in income saddled by a demanding high maintenance wife living in Paris. Yet, the people he presumably represented, did not rise in protest, allowed him to put the kabash on any reasonable civil future they might envision, thus proving they were not ready for or perhaps even worthy of independent statehood. Several short years later, bereft of Arafat, provided by Israel with the territory of Gaza, this same group of Arabs collectively elected terrorist Hamas leaders to control their presumed quest for dignity as one united group. We observe the dysfunctional outcome of that choice, and again must ask if so-called Palestinians are even capable of civilly populating one united state of their own. Their obvious inability to rid any collective territorial instinct they might possess of ruinous bogeymen further suggests that this rag tag group of Arabs perhaps is really a displaced group native to another larger territory; how about Jordan? All this more than suggests that Israel, a proven tolerant civilized democratic economically vibrant state, more than deserves all the territory it rightly captured in 1967. Having said that, let us fervently hope for the sake of Israel, the territorial instinct kicks in and dominates a beleaguered exasperated populace, the term 'occupation' is deleted from a self-defeating self-flagellating collective mindset, and all thoughts of 'land for peace' are dismissed. Nothing less than a prosperous State of Israel is at stake.

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

REALITY...THIS IS A SERIOUS SITUATION
Posted by Milton Fried, January 19, 2007.

This email comes from Jean-Jacques Duval (jjduval@hughes.net) of Willsboro, New York. This is what he writes

This is a transcript of a section of a Newt Gingrich Speech in New Hampshire. Apparently it is causing a firestorm.

This is finally said in a way that even the most "head in the sand" person can understand it. Please God, help us.

This is a very sober description of the Islamic terrorist threat we are faced with. We are NOW at war with a culture that wants, not to take over our land, but to KILL us. Please pass this on to those on your list.

NEWT GINGRICH: The third thing I want to talk about very briefly is the genuine danger of terrorism, in particular terrorists using weapons of mass destruction and weapons of mass murder, nuclear and biological weapons. And I want to suggest to you that right now we should be impaneling people to look seriously at a level of supervision that we would never dream of if it weren't for the scale of threat.

Let me give you two examples. When the British this summer arrested people who were planning to blow up ten airliners in one day, they arrested a couple who were going to use their six month old baby in order to hide the bomb as baby milk.

Now, if I come to you tonight and say that there are people on the planet who hate you, and they are 15-25 year old males who are willing to die as long as they get to kill you, I've simply described the warrior culture which has been true historically for 6 or 7 thousand years.

But, if I come to you and say that there is a couple that hates you so much that they will kill their six month old baby in order to kill you, I am describing a level of ferocity, and a level of savagery beyond anything we have tried to deal with.

And, what is truly frightening about the British experience is they are arresting British citizens, born in Britain, speaking English, who went to British schools, live in British housing, and have good jobs.

This is a serious long term war, and it will inevitably lead us to want to know what is said in every suspect place in the country, that will lead us to learn how to close down every website that is dangerous, and it will lead us to a very severe approach to people who advocate the killing of Americans and advocate the use of nuclear or biological weapons.

And, my prediction to you is that either before we lose a city, or if we are truly stupid, after we lose a city, we will adopt rules of engagement that use every technology we can find to break up their capacity to use the internet, to break up their capacity to use free speech, and to go after people who want to kill us to stop them from recruiting people before they get to reach out and convince young people to destroy their lives while destroying us.

This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about the first amendment, but I think that the national security threat of losing an American city to a nuclear weapon, or losing several million Americans to a biological attack is so real that we need to proactively, now, develop the appropriate rules of engagement.

And, I further think that we should propose a Geneva convention for fighting terrorism which makes very clear that those who would fight outside the rules of law, those who would use weapons of mass destruction, and those who would target civilians are in fact subject to a totally different set of rules that allow us to protect civilization by defeating barbarism before it gains so much strength that it is truly horrendous.

This is a sober topic, but I think it is a topic we need a national dialogue about, and we need to get ahead of the curve rather than wait until actually we literary lose a city which could literally happen within the next decade if we are unfortunate.

(APPLAUSE)

Contact Milton Fried at docmiltfried@mindspring.com

To Go To Top

ILLEGAL ALIENS WAGING 'SILENT WAR' ON US, SAYS MINUTEMAN ACTIVIST
Posted by Randy Hall, January 19, 2007.

(CNSNews.com) -- The U.S. is engaged in "a silent war" conducted by illegal aliens that is causing a higher toll than the war in Iraq, according to the founder of an immigration watchdog group.

While the mainstream media is focused on the Iraq war, this ongoing silent war is "taking its toll in lives and domestic tranquility," said Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project.

"Since 9/11 alone, about 45,000 U.S. residents have been killed in action via homicide or manslaughter at the hands of illegal aliens, and about another quarter of a million to 300,000 have been wounded," Gilchrist told Cybercast News Service in an interview.

Gilchrist said he used the terms "killed in action" and "wounded" intentionally "because essentially, we have a war going on here that's not a declared war, that's not a convention

Gilchrist said the financial cost was also significant.

Gilchrist said the financial cost was also significant.

Wal war, but it is costing us 9,000 lives a year."

That amounted to "about 15 times the rate of KIAs [soldiers killed in action] in Iraq," he said.

Gilchrist said the financial cost was also significant.

Welfare benefit programs used strictly by the illegal immigration population were costing "$400 billion a year -- that's four times the annual cost of the war in Iraq," he argued.

Those funds were being spent on "a plethora of related welfare and benefit-type programs, including medication, education, housing, HUD subsidies, Social Security, all that stuff," Gilchrist said.

"Our coffers are being plundered by those who don't deserve them," he noted. "Those programs were earmarked for American citizens."

He said that figure did not include another half-trillion dollars lost each year "due to payroll and income tax fraud from the underground economy created by having 30 million illegal aliens in the United States."

Gilchrist conceded that not all illegal immigrants were working and that not all who are working were doing so "under the table."

"But a good portion of them are, and because they're staying under the radar, no one knows who they are, where they are or what their intentions are."

Estimates of the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. vary considerably, but the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) said the numbers cited by Gilchrist "sound about right."

On the costs to the U.S. economy of illegal immigration, the CIS estimates federal costs per year at only $10.6 billion but notes that the vast majority of costs are incurred at the local and state levels.

Crime statistics relating to illegal immigrants are hazy, but on his website, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) says that 12 homicides and 13 drunk driving deaths a day are attributed to illegal aliens.

In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee immigration subcommittee in 2005, Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Heather Mac Donald said that in Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide and up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants in the first half of the previous year targeted illegal aliens.

Representatives from the National Council of La Raza and the National Immigration Forum declined requests for comment on this article.

According to the Americas Project at the Center for American Progress, the U.S. is "making a futile attempt at using Border Patrol agents and physical barriers to regulate our labor market."

"This massive misapplication of resources fails to make us safer and will not be remedied through appeals to fear, symbolism or by throwing good money after bad," project director Dan Restrepo says on the center's website.

"A safer, modern immigration system must combine border and workplace enforcement with mechanisms to regulate future flows of immigrants into our country and allow the 12 million undocumented already here to emerge from the shadows," he added. 'Multi-ethnic'

Gilchrist, a 56-year-old Marine veteran who received a Purple Heart for wounds sustained during the Vietnam War, founded the Minuteman Project in 2004 after "years of frustrated efforts trying to get a neglectful U.S. government to simply enforce existing immigration laws."

The Minuteman Project describes itself as a "citizens' vigilance operation." Its main activity is to monitor the flow of illegal immigrants across the U.S. border from Mexico, though the group also promotes proactive enforcement of the nation's immigration laws.

As Cybercast News Service previously reported, the group has been opposed by the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), which a year ago accused the group of being "racists" and "cowards."

Earlier this month, Brent Wilkes, national executive director of LULAC, told Cybercast News Service that the Minuteman Project consisted of "pretty crazy folks."

Gilchrist dismissed such accusations as "so ridiculous they hardly even merit a reply. If Wilkes would go to my website, he'd see that we're a multi-ethnic -- and I repeat, a multi-ethnic -- immigration law-enforcement advocacy group."

"My problem is not with legal immigrants. My grandparents were legal immigrants from Greece, Germany and England," he said, adding that charges of racism are "the last resort of a scoundrel losing an argument."

Still, Gilchrist said he sees a hopeful future regarding illegal immigration, in part because "the Minuteman Project is going to force debate on this issue."

"Immigration is still strong in the hearts and minds of Americans, because it goes right to the preservation of our sovereignty," Gilchrist added. "We just want to preserve a civilized society under the rule of law, under the First Amendment. That's the way the Founding Fathers set it up."

Gilchrist also noted another sign of the group's progress. "We've got a guy who wants to start a chapter up in Canada. He'll be the first non-American to be part of the Minuteman Project."

Randy Hall is CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor This article is stored at
www.discoverthenetwork.org/Articles/ Illegal%20Aliens%20Waging%20Silent%20War.html

To Go To Top

PALESTINIAN ARAB LEGAL GROUP TELLS US WHERE THEY WANT THE CASUALTIES
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 19, 2007.

Matthew Kalman's "Report says Israeli rule bears down on Gaza" (SF Chronicle, 1.19.07) summarizes the GISHA report
(www.gisha.org/english/reports.htm).

Unfortunately, both the GISHA authors and Kalman fail to note the one critical fact that renders the report worthless, or, worse, a contribution to the whitewash of Arab terrorism -- the terrorists in the Gaza Strip and West Bank are at war with Israel.

After signing the Oslo Accords in which he eschewed terrorism and committed to resolve all disputes peacefully, Arafat began his terror war, in October, 1993. For the past 13+ years, Israel has been on the defensive against an endless, relentless terror onslaught which has mounted almost 30,000 attacks, killed almost 1,700 Israelis, and wounded many thousands more.

When one ignores this state of war, the Israeli strictures seem arbitrary, totalitarian, even random. No-go zones, road blocks, lock-downs, curfews, careful search of vehicles and persons entering Israel, and control of the Gaza population registry do indeed bear down on Gaza. But they stop or empede the terrorism.

When one puts these strictures in to the context of the current state of war, with:

qassams falling daily, most of which fall harmlessly outside of Jewish communities because the no-go zones make it impossible for the qassam crews to get their armaments near enough to be as effective as the terrorists want them to be,

weekly attempts at violent terror attacks thwarted by the IDF, thanks in large part to these strictures,

at least a dozen attempts to infiltrate in to israel suicide bombers from the Gaza Strip since Israel unilaterally ceded the Gaza Strip to Hamas, all but one of which have been thwarted by the IDF, thanks in large part to these strictures (especially the tight security at crossing points from Gaza to Israel),

the daily attempts to smuggle arms and ammunition and explosives and terrorist leaders from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank, most of which are caught and stopped thanks to the strictures and tight security,

and the endless ranting of the hate speech, hate preach, and hate teach that energizes the population, from pre-kindergarten to dotage, to a state of genocidal fury against Israel and jews and Christianity and Christians and the West and all things non-Moslem and even against Moslems who are not supportive enough of the 'palestinian cause',

...then one can see that the strictures are in fact reasonable, restrained, carefully focused, and effective acts of self-defense against the terror war.

By not acknowledging that a state of war exists, both GISHA and Kalman avoid asking the hard question that puts the lie to the GISHA report's assertions: "where do you want the casualties?"

a.) With the restrictions, the casualties are the innocent civilian peace-loving palestinians who are inconvenienced, delayed, humiliated, harmed financially, reduced economically, maybe even at times harmed physically....and all because of the war that their leaders maintain despite Israel's concessions and invitations to a negotiated resolution...

....or....

b.) without the restrictions, the casualites would be even more Israelis bombed, blown up, burned alive, shot, stabbed, kidnapped, and otherwise harmed, and even more damage to Israel's economy.

It is clear that if the terrorists were to put down their weapons, there would be no more violence.
But if Israel were to put down her weapons, there would be no more Israel.

So....by decontextualizing Israel's defensive strictures, GISHA tells us where they want the casualties.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

IT ISN'T THE DEMOGRAPHY, STUPID...
Posted by Yuval Zaliouk, January 18, 2007.

Dear Friends

As I stated many times, the idea of another independent state, Palestinian or other, in tiny Judea and Samaria is practical

Anybody who tells you otherwise is simply lying!!! Even if it were the Swiss who attempted to create a state there, let alone Fatah & Hamas terrorists, it would for sure prove a failure.

It is time the world realizes there is only room for one viable country west of the Jordan River, ISRAEL. Any other arrangement will only lead to more wars and bloodsheds.

Did I hear you cry, the demography, stupid? This is another fallacy.

Here is a benchmark article on the subject from another truth provider: Caroline Glick. It's called "Where Israel went astray," and it appeared yesterday in the Jerusalem Post.
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid= 1167467765896&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

There are two reasons that IDF chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz's resignation this week was essential. First, during the war last summer with Hizbullah, Halutz failed to conceive of a war fighting plan for the IDF. Having failed, he needed to go. Second, both during the war and in the six months since its cessation, Halutz lost the faith of his officers and soldiers. A commander cannot function without the faith of his men, and so, again, he had to go.

There is every reason to expect that Halutz's replacement will win the faith of troops and officers. And it is essential that he do so quickly for as the war made clear, the IDF needs to undergo a massive, painful and rapid process of reform and overhaul if it is to meet the wide-ranging and acute challenges it faces.

Yet even if Halutz's replacement is an Israeli version of General George Patton, it is doubtful that he will have the opportunity to apply his military talents to the conceptualization and implementation of a fighting doctrine capable of defeating Israel's enemies. The IDF's doctrinal discussions are framed by the larger national debates in Israel. And today those debates remain captive to the same fantasies and lies that since 1993 have prevented the IDF from planning properly for war -- whether in Lebanon, Gaza, Judea and Samaria or even Iran.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to Israel this week reinforced this untenable situation. In an interview with The Jerusalem Post, US Ambassador Richard Jones explained that during her visit, Rice "picked up" Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's plan to hold "discussions" with Fatah terror group commander and PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas about the establishment of a Palestinian state in spite of the fact that the PA is ruled today by the Hamas terror group.

According to Jones, Livni convinced Rice that it is necessary to provide a "political horizon" to convince the Palestinians to replace Hamas with Fatah. After the Palestinians overthrow Hamas, he explained, it will be possible to implement the agreement and handover Judea and Samaria to Fatah (and Hamas).

That is, the Israeli government is pushing a national strategy that is based on a total lie. While Abbas plans his visit this weekend with Hamas terror master Khaled Mashaal in Syria in the hopes of facilitating the formation of an Iranian-Syrian sponsored Fatah-Hamas unity government, the Israeli government wishes to "strengthen" him.

A revitalized IDF will be unable to secure Israel under these conditions. As long as the guiding strategic principle dictating Israel's policies is that Israel must establish a Palestinian state, and to that end, the policy debate revolves around issues such as whether protecting the residents of Sderot from rocket attacks will strengthen or weaken Abbas, the IDF will be incapable of defending Israel regardless of who its leaders are.

SINCE THE inauguration of the 1993 Oslo peace process, Israel's national debate has largely ignored the only question that should be guiding it: How are we to advance Israel's national interests? Rather, since 1993, our national debate has been anchored around the question of how best to establish a Palestinian state. This question, rooted in the false Arab narrative which consciously rejects the morality of the Zionist revolution, has brought us to a position where the IDF is cognitively barred from rationally approaching Israel's security challenges.

Things needn't be this way. The Israeli public is quite sick of hallucinatory peace processes and is keen to reignite a Zionist national discussion. Consistent opinion polls show that the overwhelming majority of the public knows there is no possibility of achieving peace with the PA and that any Palestinian state will be a terror state. Moreover, in poll after poll, the Israeli public expresses its patriotism and its desire to strengthen and preserve the Jewish, democratic character of the State of Israel.

And there are options other than delusion. On Wednesday, one such option was presented in Washington at the American Enterprise Institute. There, the American-Israel Demographic Research Group (AIDRG) presented a plan for Israel's future called "The Fourth Way."

Led by American economist Bennett Zimmerman and former Israeli diplomat Yoram Ettinger, the AIDRG first burst onto the screen in early 2005 when it presented the first comprehensive analysis of Palestinian population data.

Since 1997, Israel's leaders have based their policies towards the Palestinians on what was perceived as a madly ticking Palestinian demographic time bomb. The public was told that the Palestinian population in Jerusalem, Gaza, Judea and Samaria was rapidly expanding and that by 2015, Jews would lose our majority west of the Jordan River. If we didn't hurry up and hand over Judea, Samaria and Gaza and partition Jerusalem, we would find ourselves forced to choose between a Jewish state and a democratic one.

The AIDRG took it upon itself to do what no Israeli governmental body had considered doing: Its members just started counting heads. It worked out that the doomsday scenario was based on a massive fabrication. In 1997, the PA published census figures that exaggerated its population figures in Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Jerusalem by nearly 50 percent. The PA double counted Arab Jerusalemites, included hundreds of thousands of emigrants to its population rolls, asserted mass immigration when in fact there has been net emigration from the PA since 1995. It exaggerated fertility rates and underplayed mortality rates. In all, the PA added approximately 1.4 million people who did not exist to its population rolls.

Rather than 3.8 million Palestinians, the team found there were likely no more, and perhaps less than 2.4 million Palestinians. Jews, who make up an 80 percent majority within sovereign Israel, make up a 59% majority of the population of Israel with Gaza and Judea and Samaria and a 67% majority of the population with Judea and Samaria without Gaza.

Last year, the group analyzed fertility trends in Israel and Judea and Samaria among Jews and Arabs. They found that in contradiction to the Palestinian and Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics forecasts, while Jewish fertility rates are on a steep and consistent incline, Arab fertility rates are steadily declining.

The significance of these actual trends is obvious: Not only is there no Palestinian demographic time bomb necessitating the immediate handover of Judea and Samaria to Palestinian terrorists. Israel's actual demographic position is its ace in the hole.

This year the team members took their data to the next logical step by offering their best shot at a national strategy for Israel, based on true population data. While one can agree or disagree with the viability of their strategy, the fact that it is based on truth rather than lies already places it in a different league from the "peace" plans that have held Israel intellectually hostage since 1993.

The plan is predicated on electoral reform in Israel that will set the course for a democratic absorption of all or parts of Judea and Samaria into Israel while securing the political rights of all Israelis -- both Jewish and Arab. Israel today is governed by a proportional electoral system that treats the entire country as a unitary voting district. The plan recommends changing the electoral system to a direct, district-based voting system divided along the lines of the Interior Ministry's administrative partition of the country.

Given Israel's 80 percent Jewish majority outside Judea and Samaria, it is unsurprising that Jews form massive majorities in every administrative district in the country except the northern district. In the North, Arabs comprise a bare 52% majority. But the internal migration of just 52,000 Jews to the North would overturn that majority.

Within Judea and Samaria, the sparsely populated sub-districts of Western Samaria and the Jordan Valley are vital for Israel's national defense. As the study shows, an internal migration of approximately 150,000 Jews to these areas would give them strong Jewish majorities. Given that the Tel Aviv district has a 99% Jewish majority and the central region of the country has a 92% Jewish majority, a national plan for populating the areas could easily facilitate such a migratory trend.

In the Jerusalem district, the population trends are in flux. The erection of the separation fence has driven tens of thousands of Arabs from Judea and Samaria into the city to avoid PA rule. Conversely, the high real estate prices in Jewish neighborhoods are forcing Jews to leave the city.

Today Jews make up a 67% majority in the capital. The researchers demonstrated that if the capital's boundaries are extended to include Jerusalem's western suburbs, the Etzion bloc, the Adumim bloc, and the Givon bloc on the Jewish side as well as Abu Dis, Beit Hanina and the north Jerusalem bloc on the Arab side, the Jewish majority of the expanded city would be 66%. The flow of Arabs into the city's center to get away from the PA would abate. Real estate prices throughout the city would drop with the increase of land supplies and so the capital would again be affordable to young Jewish families. If Bethlehem is added to the municipal boundaries of the capital, the Jewish majority would be reduced to 62%.

On the other hand, with the separation fence bringing about an effective partition of the city, "Arab Jerusalem" around its truncated and walled-off boundaries will enjoy a 72% Arab majority and the Jewish population within the shrunken, expensive capital will continue to dwindle.

NEXT WEEK Israel's premiere policy conference, the 7th Annual Herzliya Conference, will take place. The "Who's Who" of Israel will again present their "visions" for the country. In most cases, the speakers will regale us with tales of how they will make peace with the PLO and will warn us that we have to be nice to Abbas, (and eat our peas and carrots,) or be destroyed by Iranian nuclear bombs.

At last year's conference, the AIDRG team presented the data they had painstakingly compiled. They were greeted with unabashed hostility. Many walked out in the middle. Others groaned or chatted loudly with their friends trying to drown out the presentation. The audience of elitists didn't want to hear proof that for the past decade, Israel's national debate -- which they themselves have led -- has been based on a lie aimed at destroying the Zionist idea.

This year the team will return to the conference. But rather than being allowed to present their newest data and their plan, they were given a mere three minutes to speak at the end of a session about something else entirely.

Halutz's resignation was a good and necessary thing. But in and of itself, it will have little significance for Israel if it remains a lone incident. For Halutz's exit from the scene to be a harbinger for a better, safer future, it needs to be followed not only by the resignations of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Defense Minister Amir Peretz.

Our failed and delusional leaders must take their mendacious and defeatist national debate along with them. As they depart, we must regain control over our national conversation and build it upon the firm foundations of reality and a renewed commitment to advancing and securing Israel's national interests.

Yuval Zaliouk writes the Truth Provider columns. To subscribe, send an email to ynz@netvision.net.il

To Go To Top

THE TRANSLATOR SCANDAL
Posted by Michael Travis, January 19, 2007.

The other day a friend of mine revealed to me the fact that he was scheduled to meet with agents of the FBI. It seems that after almost a decade of ignoring warnings and Intel reports regarding Osama bin Laden's "American Hiroshima" operation (widely publicized by bin Laden himself, and hundreds of news agencies world-wide), our Federal employee's curiosity was finally aroused by the Canadian television series "24".

I remain deeply skeptical regarding the FBI's sudden interest in the War Against Islamic Terrorism, Brigitte Gabrielle's article below is merely one example amongst many that form the basis of my skepticism.

The FBI Translator Scandal:
ACT members respond and demand action

by Jerry Gordon

Last Thursday, Brigitte Gabriel and I put out an Action Alert to the American Congress for Truth membership, asking you for examples of how our government rebuffed your valued assistance as Arabic and Farsi linguists for critical intelligence translation work assignments in military, foreign and homeland security agencies.

In less than 72 hours were got dozens of responses and they are still coming in.

While a sampling they are nevertheless indicative of your concerns about why our government persists in denial of loyal American citizens offering to reduce the mountainous backlog of untranslated intercepts and transcripts of interrogations in Arabic and Farsi, in particular.

How mountainous is the backlog of untranslated intercepts? Read this comment from a National Security Agency (NSA) official quoted from Congressional hearings in a Washington Times article on the subject written by Rowan Scarborough and Bill Gertz entitled: "Intelligence backlog."

NSA director, Army Lt. Gen. Keith in commenting in written response to Senators on the large backlog of time consuming labor intensive foreign language intercepts on terrorism noted:

"Today's backlog is no longer confined to Arabic and its multiple dialect but also less commonly taught languages where linguists are in short supply."

One knowledgeable insider in our national security apparatus wrote in response to the ACT action alert:

"The fact that the FBI and the military don't have enough linguists/translators especially after 9/11 is a disgrace and the fact that those they have are possibly not reliable or trustworthy makes it imperative that new competent resources are found..."

Imagine that you are a Marine Corps battalion commander in Anbar province in western Iraq-hotbed of the Sunni and al Qaeda insurgency. You find out from your G-2 via counter intelligence operatives that the local interpreters procured through a contract let via a major defense contractor have been feeding intel to these insurgent groups. You're darn angry because this has cost you casualties and in some instances lives of brave Marines in your field units. What do you do besides complain to the theater ground commander and higher intelligence echelons at CENTCOMM.

As we have found out in our inquiries to our ACT members we have an overwhelming response that includes first rate Arab and Farsi linguists who are Middle Eastern Christians, Jews and apostate Muslims disappointed that their talents have gone wanting because of political correctness and frankly outright intimidation by Muslim linguists in our security agencies.

Here are some examples of the responses received from ACT members and others to date. I will begin with Brigitte Gabriel's experience. She is one of many Christian Lebanese who tried to help but got no where.

Brigitte Gabriel, ACT founder, Lebanese Christian.

Brigitte applied three times to the FBI in 2001 and 2002 VOLUNTEERING her services to help translate, in whatever capacity she could be used, to help our country in the fight against terrorism. She never got an answer. Finally the Government sent her a government application that stated that translators must be between the age of 25 and 35, (she had just turned 36), must have graduated with a degree in the language they wish to apply to translate and must have three years on job experience as translators. (utterly ridiculous bureaucracy) Meanwhile complaining on TV that they do not have enough translators. Brigitte Gabriel speaks not only the classical Arabic which is the official language of all the Middle East, but also the local dialects, Lebanese, Syrian, Egyptian, Palestinian, and Jordanian.

From an Iraqi Christian.

"I applied twice for the FBI. I never got an answer from them. I heard that the Recruiters are Egyptians and want translators with an Egyptian dialect. I don't know if religion is a factor, but I've given up. I think it will be very intimidating under these circumstances. By the way I'm an Iraqi Christian living in the U.S. I worked as a linguist for the U.S. Army in Iraq."

From a Lebanese American Christian.

"I was deployed from Ft. Benning, Georgia in May, 2003 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Supporting our armed forces and intelligence units. In October 2004, I was injured by a suicide bomb blast inside the Green Zone [in Baghdad]. I had to come back for treatment. A year ago I was released by all doctors and they recommended that I could go back to work, but not in Iraq. I called my employer and to my amazement they offered me a job back in Iraq but not a stateside one because I lacked a security clearance. I refused and they sent me a letter in January, 2006 laying me off. I have tried in vain to find a job with the government or defense contractors. The recruiters are usually Muslim and some have told me that they have relatives working for al Jazeera TV. Can you believe that!

From a Persian American Jew

I volunteered to help with Farsi translations. I heard back from them that they were interested in my Hebrew skills!! I didn't see how Hebrew came into the equation with dealing with our country's dangers. The response was very bureaucratic in nature. I have since done Farsi translation for a private think tank.

From a Coptic Christian American

"I am a Christian Egyptian who applied for a linguist position with the FBI after 9/11, went through the testing process and was sent a rejection letter. I would love to contribute to your cause, if I can be of assistance."

Rejection of American Israeli citizens

"I know personally of such a case where a loyal American applied for such service and got nowhere. This American Israel Jew got the same treatment. He is young, intelligent eastern looking guy who could make a real contribution to the efforts. Something funny is going on."

What these ACT responses do is to resonate previous reports of bias against Middle Eastern Christians, Jews and apostate Muslims chronicled in reports from WorldNetDaily about discrimination against American Israeli linguists and by investigative authors Rita Katz -- an Iraq born American Jew -- in her book "Terrorist Hunter" and Paul Sperry in his engrossing book "Infiltration."

So what is ACT going to do now that we have lifted the veil on this burgeoning scandal? Plenty.

Working with key House and Senate National and Homeland Security Committees we are going to push for following:

A GAO audit of major defense contractors supplying in-country interpreters at egregious billing rates running as high at $100,000 annually versus $30,000 for a military trained linguist interpreter;
* We are going to file under the Federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) a request for information from military, foreign and domestic intelligence agencies that includes the annexed information.
* We are going to hold a Washington Summit for ACT members to discuss this issue and more as part of a major agenda for action;
* We are going to request hearings on the translator 'scandal' from Senate and House National and Homeland Security Committees.
* We will assist these subject matter Committees on Capitol Hill in the review and preparation of remedial legislation and executive actions to bring the translator scandal to heel, so that our troops in the field and our citizens at home aren't in jeopardy of a major series of 9/11 Islamist terrorist attacks.

Act will need your help in reaching out to those of you who are U.S. citizens to get to your Congressional representatives and Bush Administration officials demanding their attention to this problem.

Keep those emails coming! They are grist for the mill and build an effective case for immediate attention to this problem. A problem that needs resolution now if this nation is to be secure. A problem that is compounded by political correctness and intimidation by American Muslim advocacy groups.

We will continue to monitor your emails and report back on developments on this issue as they emerge. Rest assured that ACT is going to make this a 'cause' that will resound in the halls of Congress and the mainstream media.

Thank you for telling it like it is. With your support ACT will win this battle!

Proposed Federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request

Information Request
U.S. Security Hiring Practices of Arabic, Farsi, Turkic and Urdu Translators and Analysts

Census of Qualified Translators Employed;

1. Demographics

Number in staff
Age, Sex, Ethnicity, Religious affiliation
Citizenship: U.S. / if non U.S., country of origin

Educational attainment: high school, college/university/graduate school
Language training: formal college/university or military language programs, others
Military rank or GS- pay grades
Years of service/experience
Location: U.S. -national /regional offices
Abroad: Countries where currently deployed

2. Recruitment policies and programs

Current and project staffing requirements
Career development programs in language and area studies
University language and NSEP programs
Military language programs
Community outreach programs
Foreign sourcing programs
Standardized language testing
Candidate screening criteria
Candidate Acceptance rejection rates by ethnicity and religious affiliation

3. Target language translation and analysis requirements

Current level of translation needs -- number of lines of original language texts or message transmissions for translation
Number of assigned language translator/analysts
Current level of translation reports and output -- number of lines of texts and message transmissions
Backlog deficit of un-translated lines of texts and message transmissions
Contract language translation services -- volume and extent of procurement, domestic U.S. versus foreign providers
Machine language translation augmentation and support-availability, uses and quality of output.

Language translation program development and initiatives
History of programs-pre and post 9/11
Objectives of programs vis a vis support of domestic and international security
Interim Remedial adjustments vis a vis program recruitment, staffing
Future program initiatives to cover current language translation deficits

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

American Congress for Truth (ACT) is a 501c3 non profit organization that meets with politicians, decision makers, speaks on college campuses and plans events to educate and inform the public about the threat of radical Muslim fundamentalists to world peace. We are committed to combating the global upsurge of hate and intolerance. Email them at member@americancongressfortruth.com

To Go To Top

"THIS IS NOT IDEOLOGY. IT'S A MENTAL ILLNESS."
Posted by Michael Travis, January 19, 2007.

This was crossposted on Eye on the World website:
http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/ which also has a satirical clip, Death to America on the January 23, 2007 page. It may be satirical but it sounds very like the real thing.

DUBLIN, Ireland (CNN) -- At a recent debate over the battle for Islamic ideals in England, a British-born Muslim stood before the crowd and said Prophet Mohammed's message to nonbelievers is: "I come to slaughter all of you."

"We are the Muslims," said Omar Brooks, an extremist also known as Abu Izzadeen. "We drink the blood of the enemy, and we can face them anywhere. That is Islam and that is jihad."

Anjem Choudary, the public face of Islamist extremism in Britain, added that Muslims have no choice but to take the fight to the West.

"What are Muslims supposed to do when they are being killed in the streets in Afghanistan and Baghdad and Palestine? Do they not have the same rights to defend themselves? In war, people die. People don't make love; they kill each other," he said.

But in the same debate, held on the prestigious grounds of Dublin's Trinity College in October, many people in the crowd objected.

"These people, ladies and gentleman, have a good look at them. They actually believe if you kill women and children, you will go to heaven," said one young Muslim who waved his finger at the radicals.

"This is not ideology. It's a mental illness." [...]

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

AN INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL OREN
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 19, 2007.

the four urls below are our last month's TV show, "Spotlight on the Middle East", the January program with our interview of Professor Michael Oren. It is divided in to four parts to accomodate Google technology.

We hope to eventually have all of our TV programs on Google; and next month's show, taped this past Tuesday and due to be screend by the end of this month, may be available on Google soon. For more information about the "spotlight" series, check out our website and other information below.

The broadcasting times are:

Sundays at 8:30 AM,
Mondays at 8 PM, >
Tuesdays at 12 PM,
Thursdays at 6 PM,
and Fridays at 10 AM.

Channel 27 in the Palo Alto -- Menlo Park -- Atherton areas. And see below for other viewing options for people further afield.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8602672296600691699&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5139834914729588065&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5812863035244564903&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6352533490241459905&hl=en

During the last weeks of January (07) and most of February, our TV show, "Spotlight on the Middle East", will air on channel 27 (Palo Alto, Atherton, Menlo Park, California) per the schedule in the up-dated news release below.

For our February show, Marty Wasserman and I address the issue of former President Carter's new book: "Palestine, peace not apartheid".

Our program focused on the wave of criticism leveled at his book for its innacuracies, de-contextualizations, mis-statements of fact, misleading ommissions, and, in some cases, demonstrable lies and forged documentation and falsified maps and plagerism....all condeming of Israel but whitewashing or even legitimizing Arab terrorism.

We discussed the resignations of some of his former associates, students, and advisors at the Carter Center.

We also discussed the degree to which Arab money (hundreds of millions of dollars from the Arab petro-wealthy to him and his Carter Center at Emory University) may have influenced Carter to speak out in favour of dictators (either Arab dictators or others who were in favor with the Arab world), repressive Arab regimes, the PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, Arafat and terrorists in general.

Similarly, we raised the question: can the fact that his latest book is a parody of history or peace-making and instead regurgitates the Arab propaganda, lie for lie, be a function of his loyalties having been purchased by Arab oil money?

I encourage you to view our show, and contact me at this email address, or at our website (see below) for input, critique, corrections (if, God Forbid, we goofed on something), accolades, and suggestions for future topics.

As described below, you can tune in to the show even if you are not in our viewing area (Palo Alto, Atherton, East Palo Alto) by going directly on the internet at the dates and times noted below, Pacific Coast Time, at the following address:
http://www.communitymediacenter.net/watch/videos/ch27_live.html

The alternative way to view the show on the internet is to go to our Note that there is NO archiving. So you must go to our website at the Pacific Coast time that the show is aired in order to watch it on line.

Note too that our show changes monthly with a new show starting the last week of each month. We all look forward to hearing from you.

And don't forget my radio show: "Mid-East Media Watch", on Stanford University's KZSU 90.1 FM radio. The show airs every Friday from 11:00 -- 11:30 am, as part of "The Jewish Alternative", where I and producer Sara Bellum discuss the week's media coverage of the middle-east conflict.

We are now back on the air, because the mid-winter break at Stanford is over. We will be on the air every friday, 11:00-11:30 AM (90.1 fm, KZSU.Stanford) until Spring break.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE DAY -- 27TH JANUARY 2007
Posted by Simon McIlwaine, January 19, 2007.
International Holocaust Remembrance Day

Please get your supporters and Church contacts fully on board with the campaign Learn from History for Holocaust Day during Holocaust Week.

The website is: www.learnfromhistory.eu

Please register your support.

This is VERY, VERY important and there is also information and material for Churches to use to commemorate the event.

If you need any further help please let us know as I believe that this is critical and considerable time and effort has been spent on this project and we need to get the maximum from it.

They gave us our roots. We cut them off and sent them to die in places like Auschwitz, Dachau and Birkenau. While we were silent they disappeared like smoke before our eyes.

Now it is time to repent and learn from history. Only by confronting the past can we build a better future in Europe. No longer can we remain silent when the calls to destruction are again echoing in the world.

This time let's get it right. Perhaps the old roots can start to give life again? Perhaps the rain will fall again over the hills of Europe, and the trees bear new fruit.

Please visit our website at: www.anglicansforisrael.com

Contact Simon McIlwaine by email at Simon.McIlwaine@ormerods.co.uk

To Go To Top

EHUD'S EYELID JOB
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 19, 2007.

1. The missiles were falling on the Negev, fired from Gaza. The very top officials in the Israeli Tax Authority were under arrest for corruption. The Hezbollah was re-arming on Israel's northern border and Iran was openly threatening genocide. Israel's army chief of staff resigned in disgrace for the fiasco of the war this past summer.

And what was Prime Minister Ehud Olmert up to in the midst of all this?

Why, he was getting himself an "eyelid job". In order to change his image from one of a crooked, beady-eyed political hack, Olmert just underwent eyelid surgery, to make him look nicer. And who paid for this cosmetic surgery? The press was not telling. Perhaps it was the same group of business cronies who were involved in Olmert's shady dealings in real estate or in the "bank privatization affair," for which Israel's Attorney General has now decided to indict Olmert.

And just as it looked like Olmert could not mess things up any worse than he already had, the media broke the story that he and his mates had been secretly negotiating a deal with Syria. Under the proposed deal Israel would reward Syria for 70 years of aggression and so would return to its pre-1967 borders, those same borders once described by Abba Eban as "Auschwitz borders". Will Olmert now blink his new lids when it comes to the Golan?

A "deal" for a "return" of the Golan Heights to Syria was almost signed by Ehud Barak in 2000, in large part the initiative of Israeli capitulationist diplomat Itamar Rabinovich (currently serving as President of Tel Aviv University). Had it been concluded, that deal would have moved Syrian armed forces right up to the shores of the Sea of Galilee, the Syrian military would have taken up new positions threatening Israel, and Israel's very existence could have been endangered if a new all-out war were to break out.

Instead of striking a poorly-conceived deal with Syria to take attention away from his sleaze, perhaps it would be better if Mr. Olmert were to stay home and work some more on his eyelids.....
(More to follow)

2. Blog Story of the Day:
This is from Sultan Knish.
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2007/01/ urban-outfitters-announce-their-latest.html
See also
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467767600& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull //-->

Urban Outfitters announce their latest line of WASP Terrorist Sympathizer Wear

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com. Contact him at splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il

To Go To Top

FROM A HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR: IT IS NOT SUCH A BAD IDEA TO BE A MAD DOG RATHER THAN A SILENT LAMB
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 19, 2007.

The article below was inspired by Holocaust survivors' discussions on the Iranian threat. It is called "The Iranian Threat To Wipe Israel Off The Map." and was written by Solly Ganor, a Holocaust Survivor, who live in Herzelia, Israel. It was distributed by Leonard and Carol Raizin.

It is rather apparent that not too many people realize how Holocaust survivors really feel about this subject matter.

I would be grateful if you would pass it on to as many readers as possible.

Sadam Hussein who threatened to burn down Israel was hanged yesterday without fulfilling his wish. Among his last words was '" Long live Palestine." The main reason why he hated Israel was the fact that in 1981 we thwarted his plans to Build and atomic bomb. A squadron of Israeli fighter-bombers took care of that threat.

Former U.S. Secretary State, Mr. James A Baker was furious with Israel and threatened us with sanctions. However, in 1991 during the first Iraqi war President Bush, the father, was very grateful that we did it. It is doubtful that the coalition forces would have dared to attack Sadam Hussein if he possessed nuclear weapons.

Most likely, had Sadam Hussein been alive and well today, he would be the ruler not only of Kuwait but perhaps of Saudi Arabia and the other gulf oil states. It was Israel that prevented that calamity.

However, with Sadam gone we are faced with another threat: Iran, its leaders proclaim day and night that they will wipe Israel off the map.

The world doesn't seem particularly disturbed by the threat of a new Holocaust against the Jewish state.

The majority of Holocaust survivors and their descendents live in Israel. The new threat evokes in us old nightmares of Dachau and Auschwitz, Babi Yar and Ponar. Are we going to face this new threat once again alone with the whole world standing silently by as it did during the last Holocaust?

How serious are the threats coming from Iran?

Considering that the Islamic death cult is the prevailing philosophy among the Islamic terrorists, it is very serious. It becomes even more serious when you see on Iranian television thousands of young people signing up to become suicide bombers for Allah, not to mention they do the same is dozens of other Islamic countries.

Would they use their nuclear weapons against Israel once they developed it? We think that it is more than likely.

However, there is a small difference between the last Holocaust and the looming one ahead.

The chief of the Israeli air force is the son of Holocaust survivors. The only Israeli cosmonaut Ilan Ramon who, unfortunately perished in the Columbia space shuttle crash, was one of the pilots who bombed and destroyed the Iraqi Osirak atomic reactor in 1981. He too was a son of Holocaust survivors. There are many more high-ranking officers in the Israeli army and air force that are children of Holocaust survivors and are very sensitive to the Holocaust issues.

I am sure that there are those in Israel who are working on the problem right now and if necessary, will deal with the Iranians they way they dealt with the Iraqis in 1981.

Those who doubt us do not understand what the Holocaust means to us survivors, our children, grand children, and all of Israel.

I suggest, that not only the Iranians should take notice of it, but Western countries as well. If they think that Israel will sit quietly and allow it to be wiped off the map they should better think twice about it.

I remember a conversation I had with two young Germans in Frankfurt a few years ago. My publishers, Fischer Verlag, invited me to Frankfurt to discuss my book Das Andere Leben with a group of young people. The book was originally published in English under the name of Light One Candle. After the lecture I met two young Germans who explained to me why they think that Israel is the most dangerous country in the world. Naturally, I was outraged. Their argument was as follows:

"We consider Israel the most dangerous country not because we think that Israel constitutes a danger to Europe. What we do believe is that if a major war breaks out again between Israel and the Arab States, and Israel's existence is threatened you may set the world on fire with your nuclear arsenal."

I was getting a really annoyed with them and answered:

"If you mean that this time, we won't go peacefully to the gas chambers like good little Jews, you are absolutely right. We won't, even if we have to use all means at our disposal; if Europe is effected by that, too bad. Your continent is soaked with Jewish blood anyway. Perhaps it could do with some cleansing." I said sharply.

There was a short silence. The Germans looked embarrassed.

At the time I was furious with the Germans, but perhaps they weren't so wrong. Perhaps we should make crystal clear to the world that as far as the survival of Israel is concerned they better take into the account our Holocaust background. Perhaps it is not such a bad idea to be considered a mad dog rather than a silent lamb.

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com

To Go To Top

IS THE ROAD MAP STILL RELEVANT?
Posted by Unity Coalition for Israel, January 18, 2007.

This was written by Daniel Pipes, who is director of the Middle East Forum (www.meforum.org), "a think tank that "works to define and promote American interests in the Middle East." He is author of "Miniatures" (Transaction Publishers). Contact him at his website: http://www.DanielPipes.org

Question asked of Jerusalem Post columnists: "Do you believe the road map is still relevant? Is there a need for a new plan?" For all replies, see "Burning Issues #21 Is the road map still relevant?"

The question implies that once upon a time, the "concrete, three-phase implementation road map" (as it is more fully known) was relevant. That, however, never was the case. As Yitschak Ben-Gad succinctly summed up the problem in the title of his 2004 book, it was always the "roadmap to nowhere." Or as I counseled in a February 2003 article, Israelis and Americans should hold firm against "road maps that lead exactly in the wrong direction."

The plan was born a bureaucratic monstrosity; of its myriad faults, grown perhaps the most fundamental was its assumption that if only the Palestinians were given just a tad more of this or that, they would finally recognize the benefits of harmonious co-existence with a Jewish state of Israel. Not to have learned by now that Palestinians have larger and more aggressive ambitions than to live side-by-side with Israel implies living in a state of denial.

Due to continued Palestinian violence against Israelis, the road map to nowhere has, fortunately, not been implemented. I don't suppose it ever will be, and I sleep better in that expectation.

And no, there is no need for a new plan. The Bush administration should return to its predecessors' willingness to mediate, facilitate, and fund, and drop its overly-ambitious notions of "solving the Arab-Israeli conflict." As Irving Kristol memorably observed, "Whom the gods would destroy, they first tempt to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict."

The Unity Coalition for Israel (http://www.israelunitycoalition.org) is "the largest worldwide coalition of Jewish and Christian organizations, with more than 200 groups representing millions of people dedicated to Israel. Though we have many different backgrounds, we have one common goal: A Safe and Secure Israel."

"Israel is not just a Jewish issue. Millions of Christians resolutely endorse the principle of peace with security for the state of Israel. Because we work closely together and speak with a united voice, our message is being heard!"

To Go To Top

IMPORTANT ACTION. YOUR HELP IS NEEDED
Posted by Richard Hellman, January 18, 2007.

Indict Iran's President for inciting Genocide

Take Action!

"Never again!" Must Mean "Never! Again."

Call, email, fax, write, or meet with your U.S. Representative ASAP to urge him/her to become a co-sponsor of House Con.Res. 21, urging the UN Security Council to charge Iran's President Ahmadinejad for inciting genocide against Israel and its people. It was introduced by Reps. Steve Rothman (D-NJ), Mark Kirk (R-IL) and others on January 8, 2007.

Ask your two Senators to support a similar Senate Resolution. Timing is vital. Your quick action will demonstrate that we are serious about the vow "never again!"

Urge your Representative to call Congressman Rothman's office (202-225-5061) to join him, Rep. Mark Kirk and others as co-sponsors of this vital H.Con.Res 21 and contact your two Senators to ask them to launch a champion measure in the Senate. For more information visit our website: www.cipaconline.org

Richard Hellman is President of Cipac -- Christians' Israel Public Action Campaign. Visit their website: http://www.cipaconline.org. For more information, write info@cipaconline.org

To Go To Top

IF YOU PLAN TO BE IN ISRAEL, PLEASE PLAN TO DONATE BLOOD
Posted by A Tirschwell, January 18, 2007.

Magen David Adom (MDA) continues to have a shortage of type O blood (and other types as well). If you are visiting Israel in the next two weeks, or know someone who is, please consider taking an hour to donate blood. There's no more meaningful hands on way to help all Israelis.

The American Friends of Magen David Adom will be sponsoring a blood drive at the Inbal Hotel in Jerusalem on Thursday, January 24 from 4:00 to 8:00 PM that is open to the public. In addition, blood drives will be sponsored at Yeshivat Ohr David on January 22 from 2:00-5:30 PM, and at the Yeshiva University campus with Yeshivat Torat Schraga and the YU Kollel on January 30 from 1:00 to 5:00 PM.

For other times and locations throughout Israel, visit the MDA web site (in Hebrew) at http://www.mdais.org/main/siteNew/index.php? langId=3&page=539 to see where you can donate.

Please pass this all along to maximize blood donations.

For more information on these or other Magen David Adom activities, please contact Jonathan Feldstein, Israel Representative of American Friends of Magen David Adom at 057-761-4220 or jfeldstein@afmda.org.

Contact the poster at ravaaron@012.net.il

To Go To Top

HOW TO TOPPLE THE MULLAHS
Posted by Front Page Magazine, January 18, 2007.
This article was written by Kenneth R. Timmerman and it appeared today in www.FrontPageMag.com

For now, the nutty recommendation of the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group that the United States should engage in direct talks with Syria and Iran appears to have been mooted by events on the ground.

U.S. military forces have caught Iran red-handed -- twice -- over the past few weeks in Iraq, No one can possibly doubt any longer what I and many others have been saying for some time: that Iran is involved on the ground in Iraq and is aiding both Sunni and Shia insurgents in an effort to blow that country apart.

But like all bad ideas in Washington, rest assured that the Baker-Hamilton recommendation of direct talks will come back. Study group members can be counted upon to argue that the capture of top Iranian Revolutionary Guards and intelligence officials in Iraq only proves their point that Iran has real influence and thus must be dealt with directly, to prevent them from playing the spoiler's role.

And by the way, they will argue, what's the alternative? Nuke Iran?

It is regrettable and truly astonishing that President Bush has not applied to Iran and to Syria the same global vision he has so eloquently displayed in regards to Iraq and other fronts in the global war against the Islamic jihad. Because there is a clear alternative to the capitulation offered by Baker, Hamilton, and their advisors.

Instead of rewarding these regimes, the United States should use its tremendous resources to contain Syria and to undermine the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Such a policy is not far-fetched, nor is it based solely on ideology, although compelling moral arguments can be made in its favor. Instead, it serves the national and historic interests of the United States.

Syria is a weak and failing state, that survives largely because it goes unchallenged.

After the assassination in Feb. 2005 of Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri, the Lebanese people revolted against Syrian interference in their country. The brave and persistent demonstrations of the Cedars Revolution forced Syria to withdraw its forces from Lebanon. The failure of the United Nations and the international community to keep pressure on the Syrian regime encouraged Syria to creep back in through the back door.

The lessons just of these past two years are crystal clear: pressuring Syria works; acquiescing to Syria does not. And yet, the Baker-Hamilton group chooses acquiescence. When Syria sins, force Israel to make concessions, the ISG recommends. If there is logic here, it is not of the sort to make Americans proud.

Instead, the United States should make the Syrian regime understand that it will pay a real price for its transgressions. Serious economic sanctions on Syria for its continued support of Hezbollah, in defiance of UN Security Council resolution 1701, would have a devastating impact on the minority Alouite regime. And targeted military strikes on Syrian border outposts and military units caught red-handed aiding Iraqi insurgents would send a clear warning to Syria's military leaders. If Syria did not get the message, the United States could step up the pressure by targeted air strikes on Damascus safehouses where Iraqi insurgent leaders continue to hide.

Syria has always backed down when challenged. If Mr. Baker were truly the "realist" he claims to be, he would acknowledge this and propose policies accordingly.

The Islamic Republic of Iran, however, is made of different stuff. This is a regime that over the past twenty-seven years has been willing to pay a tremendously high price in blood and treasure to pursue its radical policies. Since the 1979 revolution, the United States has repeatedly attempted to "influence the behavior" of the regime, without success.

As I wrote in these pages just last month, the Baker-Hamilton proposal is a warmed rehash of the same failed policy we've been trying since 1979.

There is only one approach that will get the attention of the Tehran's revolutionary and clerical leaders; and this is the one approach that Baker and Hamilton -- and the foreign policy Establishment -- have rejected: support for regime change.

This is the one approach that the United States and its allies have never tried. Short of an all-out U.S. military assault on Iran, it is the only approach that can avoid a future Persian Gulf region dominated by a radical Iranian regime armed with nuclear weapons. Saying pretty-please, as the Baker-Hamilton group proposed, just isn't going to work.

Empowering Iranians to change their regime will be costly. From having worked with opponents to the Iranian regime over the past twenty years, and studied the requirements of opposition groups currently working inside Iran, I believe the United States should be prepared to commit a minimum of $300 million over an initial six month period if we are to have any hope of a successful outcome.

The very first step must be the appointment by the President of a Special Envoy for Iran, with full presidential authority to convene a loya jirga type meeting of several hundred prominent Iranian leaders. The majority of those able to attend such a meeting will of necessity come from the diaspora; some will come secretly from the inside.

That meeting should focus on establishing a broad declaration of principles around which the various opposition factions can unite, and then electing an executive committee that will include authorized spokespersons for the pro-freedom movement. (Much of the ground work for such a broad meeting of Iranians has already been accomplished over the past two years, thanks to the Iranians themselves).

Over the next six months, the following tasks must be accomplished:

  • Drafting a detailed game plane for organizing massive non-violent protests against the regime in Tehran. This game plan must include strategies for neutralizing the Revolutionary Guards, the bassij corps, and paramilitary gangs loyal to extremists in the current regime, and for preventing the Islamic-Marxist Mujahedin Khalq, which worked with the regime during the early years of the revolution, from exploiting the situation and seizing power in a putsch. It must also include a strategy for providing financial support to striking workers and professionals;

  • Specific policy recommendations for the United States and our allies, so we can best leverage tools available to governments and international organizations for delegitimizing and destabilizing the Tehran regime. (The U.S. Department of the Treasury has made a modest start here).

  • Identify, contact, and train key operations officers on the ground in Iran;

  • Identify and pre-position secure communications and other equipment needed to coordinate operations inside Iran; and

  • Establish a finance committee tasked with harnessing the tremendous resources of the Iranian diaspora, who have withheld major support to the pro-freedom movement because they rightly judged that the movement lacked U.S. support.

Broadcasting must be an integral part of any comprehensive political plan to challenge the legitimacy of the Iranian regime and promote non-violent regime change. However, none of the $300 million fund should go to expanding the Persian language service of Voice of America or Radio Farda, the Persian service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Both have failed utterly to live up to the goal for which they were established.

Rather than communicate an American viewpoint during Iran's proxy war against Israel this past summer, for example, VOA television sent reporters to Beirut to interview top Hezbollah leaders -- the same Hezbollah leaders Iranian state television was treating as rock stars.

As for Radio Farda ("Tomorrow"), established to be a "surrogate" for the free media Iranians could not access inside their own country, it became a laughing stock by championing Iran's failed reformist president, Mohammad Khatami.

Since Ahmadinejad took over as president in 2005, Radio Farda has adopted the "music-first" model of Westwood One and become simply irrelevant. Both are a waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars and should be downsized or eliminated altogether.

Instead, funding should be provided to private Iranian broadcasters who understand the political thirst of their compatriots and know how to package a compelling message in a professional format. The allotment of the broadcasting budget should be determined by the Executive Committee, with a preference to pluralism and professionalism.

The U.S. intelligence community can play a support role in this effort, but should not take the lead. The last thing we need is to ask the Central Intelligence Agency to organize the Iranian opposition.

On the contrary, much of this program can -- and must -- be accomplished overtly. Having the President of the United States openly support the aspirations of the Iranian people, at the same time devoting $300 million to back the effort, will have a tremendous impact on pro-democracy forces inside Iran, without yet putting lives at risk.

At the end of the initial six month period, the President can then decide if he believes the program is viable. If so, he can pull the trigger on the plan devised by the pro-freedom groups in coordination with his Special Envoy. The U.S. will need to commit another $500 million or so to the effort of organizing and supporting the massive non-violent protest movement throughout Iran. This will be supplemented by another $500 million or more raised from the Iranian diaspora.

This is expensive, for sure. But it is far less costly than the alternatives of facing a nuclear-armed Iran, or having to send in U.S. troops to prevent Iran from deploying or firing nuclear weapons.

The Baker-Hamilton approach of engaging the terror-masters brings great risks and few rewards. It sends a clear message that terrorism, even conducted against the world's sole superpower, is a strategy that works. Engagement with Iran and Syria will foster more terror, not curtail it.

Furthermore, engaging regimes that systematically repress their own people and seek to destroy a bold democratic experiment on their borders, sends a clear message to pro-democracy forces inside those countries that their efforts can never succeed.

In one simple stroke, the Baker-Hamilton approach will have emboldened our enemies, and deterred our potential allies. And yet, for reasons that only the chattering classes can explain, this goes by the name "realism."

Supporting regime change by Iranians, while containing Syria, not only makes the best strategic sense for America. It is the right thing to do.

To Go To Top

TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PROPOSALS
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 18, 2007.

I. We are the Aryan Neo-Nazi Party. We strive for the complete destruction of Israel and of the Jewish people. We think that this destruction can be achieved in total, even if it is implemented in stages. We hate Jews and want to see an end to Jewish history and Jewish existence.

Accordingly, we have prepared a master plan for achieving our goal of total annihilation of Israel:

1. Israel must withdraw as a first step to its pre-1967 border and it must set up an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
2. The Hamas organization must then be the party in control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
3. Israel must refrain from all retaliation against Palestinians, no matter what. The entire world must exert pressure on Israel NOT to use force against Palestinian armed forces.
4. Israel must conduct negotiations even while it is under fire.
5. Israel must never retaliate for rockets being fired into the Negev.
6. Israel must end all attempts at assassinating Palestinian leaders or militia commanders.
7. Israel must allow Israeli Arabs to set up their own national institutions inside Israel, including their own parliament, shadow government, fiscal institutions, and school system, and where Israeli Arabs fly the Palestinian flag over all their institutions and gatherings.
8. Israel must institute affirmative action preferences to ensure that Arabs hold positions of power in all areas.
9. Israel must release all imprisoned Arab terrorists and murderers without any conditions.
10. Israel must turn the Golan Heights over to Syria and allow the Syrian military to take up positions there.
11. Israel must abandon the Shabaa Farm on its Lebanese border.
12. Israel must slash its military budget by an enormous percent and transfer the funds to social spending.
13. Israel must never attack the Hezbollah under any circumstances.
14. Israel must unilaterally foreswear development and use of nuclear weapons.
15. Israel must refrain from using any weapons that are controversial, such as cluster bombs.
16. Israel must remove all Jewish symbols from its flag and national anthem.
17. Israel must agree to an unrestricted "right of return" for Arabs wishing to return to pre-1967 Israel.
18. Israeli schools must refer to Israel's creation as the Naqba or catastrophe (in Arabic).
19. Israel must pay compensation to any Arab ever injured, or who lost property, as a result of the Middle East conflict.
20. Israel must set up an Arab-language university for its Arab student population, in which Arab nationalism will be the focus of instruction.

II. We are the Israeli Professors for a Compassionate Peace. We want an end to the Middle East conflict. We believe in peace and equality. We strive for justice. We hate violence. We are patriots who love our country. All we want is a fair and peaceful resolution to the Middle East's problems.

Accordingly, we have prepared a master plan for achieving our goal of peaceful resolution for Israel and its neighbors:

1. Israel must withdraw as a first step to its pre-1967 border and it must set up an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
2. The Hamas organization must then be the party in control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
3. Israel must refrain from all retaliation against Palestinians, no matter what. The entire world must exert pressure on Israel NOT to use force against Palestinian armed forces.
4. Israel must conduct negotiations even while it is under fire.
5. Israel must never retaliate for rockets being fired into the Negev.
6. Israel must end all attempts at assassinating Palestinian leaders or militia commanders.
7. Israel must allow Israeli Arabs to set up their own national institutions inside Israel, including their own parliament, shadow government, fiscal institutions, and school system, and where Israeli Arabs fly the Palestinian flag over all their institutions and gatherings.
8. Israel must institute affirmative action preferences to ensure that Arabs hold positions of power in all areas.
9. Israel must release all imprisoned Arab terrorists and murderers without any conditions.
10. Israel must turn the Golan Heights over to Syria and allow the Syrian military to take up positions there.
11. Israel must abandon the Shabaa Farm on its Lebanese border.
12. Israel must slash its military budget by an enormous percent and transfer the funds to social spending.
13. Israel must never attack the Hezbollah under any circumstances.
14. Israel must unilaterally foreswear development and use of nuclear weapons.
15. Israel must refrain from using any weapons that are controversial, such as cluster bombs.
16. Israel must remove all Jewish symbols from its flag and national anthem.
17. Israel must agree to an unrestricted "right of return" for Arabs wishing to return to pre-1967 Israel.
18. Israeli schools must refer to Israel's creation as the Naqba or catastrophe (in Arabic).
19. Israel must pay compensation to any Arab ever injured, or who lost property, as a result of the Middle East conflict.
20. Israel must set up an Arab-language university for its Arab student population, in which Arab nationalism will be the focus of instruction.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com.

To Go To Top

LOST IN TRANSLATION: ABBAS THREAT TO ISRAEL
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 18, 2007.

The shaven and suit wearing Palestinian Authority (PA) president Mahmoud Abbas is the darling of the West. He is an old-school Communist, Yasser Arafat's life long right hand man, a "protégé" of Arafat's terror school, and a Holocaust denier with the same grandiose new Holocaust plan as his mentor. In spite of this rather frightening description, for unknown reasons, the West is constantly dating him.

This article was written by Michael Widlanski, who is a specialist in Arab politics and communication at the Rothberg School of Hebrew University. He is a former reporter, correspondent and editor, respectively, at The New York Times, The Cox Newspapers-Atlanta Constitution, and The Jerusalem Post. He has also served as a special advisor to Israeli delegations to peace talks in 1991-1992 and as Strategic Affairs Advisor to the Ministry of Public Security, editing secret PLO Archives captured in Jerusalem

Arabic-expert Dr. Michael Widlanski points out that it is very much possible the real Abbas and the threat he poses to Israel are all "lost in translation."

What Mahmoud Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen, is saying, and what he is planning to do, is far from what Secretary Condoleezza Rice and the West care to understand or act upon.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas made a very militant anti-Israel speech this week, but most of its violent message was lost in translation, because Abbas used a somewhat obscure wording in Arabic.

"Let a thousand flowers bloom, and let our rifles, all our rifles, all our rifles, be aimed at the Occupation," declared Abbas using an apparent reference to the old oratory of Communist leader Mao Tse Tung.

Even non-Arabs well-schooled in Arabic had trouble figuring out the strange verb from "da'a" used by Dr. Abbas, but it is a command form that means "let us" or "leave us begin to" from the weak Arabic verbal root Wa-da-'a (Waw, Dal 'Ayin). [See Hans Wehr, ADictionary of Modern Written Arabic, p.1058]

The phrase is important in many ways, because it shows --That Dr. Abbas, who studied at the KGB's Patrice Lumumba University for Third World leaders, continues to heed Communist revolutionary rhetoric and tactics -- That Dr. Abbas is committed to the "revolutionary path" of Yasser Arafat, who also saluted those using violence against Israel; -- And that Abbas believes that the Palestinian revolution requires continued violence against Israel, and that this violence can actually be a unifying factor among Palestinians, though Abbas has said that the timing of the violence is of critical.

"I say to the master of the martyrs," declared Abbas, saluting Arafat, "your sons will continue your march. I say to you, your lion cubs will continue this struggle (nidal), this battle (kifaah) until a Palestinian state is established on the land of Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital.

Abbas, who spoke for more than 30 minutes on Jan. 11 in Ramallah, made it clear that he was distinguishing between the "struggle" or "battle" against Israel and the "fighting" among Palestinians.

"Firing weapons at my brother my friend, my neighbor," declared Arafat's successor, "is forbidden, forbidden, forbidden," repeating his words and waving his left hand strongly.

But Abbas said the Palestinian struggle would continue despite setbacks.

"They have killed us everywhere, but this revolution, by virtue of the determination of its people, by virtue of the determination of its youth--this revolution has continued and it will continue until we fulfill the Palestinian dream."

Abbas was speaking at the forty-second anniversary of the founding of the Fatah organization-a day commemorating the first Palestinian attack on Israel's national water carrier on January 1, 1965, and Abbas was trying to use the occasion unify the divided Palestinian community, perhaps by using Israel as a common enemy.

The Fatah Day speech was delayed by ten days of massive fighting between Fatah and Hamas, both of which are wrestling for leadership of the Palestinian Authority in the wake of Yasser Arafat's death in November 2004.

"Since our launching to this day, we have believed in principles which we shall not relinquish. From the dawn of our beginning we have said 'Let a thousand flowers bloom and let our rifles, all our rifles, all our rifles, be aimed at the Occupation.' And we will keep the oath, the renewed national unity, for everyone who cares for the sake of the homeland and in the path of the homeland," declared Abbas.

Frequently throughout his speech, Abbas referred to Arafat as martyr, similarly describing those Fatah gunmen who died while carrying out attacks on Israel.

Abbas's comments were interpreted by Palestinians themselves as a clear reference to attacking Israel-a badge of honor rather than something to condemn.

The Palestianin leader's words were repeated almost exactly in later television shows by other Palestinian officials, such as Ibrahim Abu-Naja and Dr. Kamal Sharafy who called Israel "the enemy" and "the Zionist enemy," respectively.

As if to remove any doubt about the militancy of Abbas's words and the place to aim Palestinian rifles, minutes after Abbas's own speech, Palestinian television's senior announcer, described Israel's establishment as the beginning of "occupation."

"No one [here] is a criminal. All our people are as one hand to free our land," declared Abbas, speaking about the struggle against Israel that unites all Palestinians. Not once in his speech did he condemn or even disapprove of continuing rocket attacks and attempted suicide assaults by Hamas and by his own Fatah movement.

But Abbas made it clear that Palestinian violence had to be curtailed for practical reasons, because it was "crossing a red line," endangering Palestinians.

"I have heard the sound gunshots here, and that is forbidden," asserted Abbas, the Fatah and PLO chairman, remonstrating against the largely pro-Fatah crowd that gathered to listen to his words in the town of Ramallah, north of Jerusalem.

"Condemning and preventing internal fighting," was his goal, asserted Abbas, referring to the internal Palestinian bloodletting in which about 300 Palestinians died last year. Stopping this "falatan" -- anarchy in Arabic -- was his regime's first priority, said Abbas, but his words did not seem to convince the crowd.

"Hamas is a bunch of Shiites," cried members of the crowd, using the term "Shiite" as a kind of curse, and Abbas again rebuked his own Fatah members, saying, "This [kind of talk] too is forbidden," as he tried to strike nationalistic and Islamic themes of unity, departing slightly from his prepared speech.

"No one [Palestinian] is outside our society," yelled Abbas waving his hands at the noisy crowd. He specifically saluted the late Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, one of the founders of Hamas, which developed the human bomb attacks that ravaged Israel from 1994-2004, after Israel signed several agreements with the Palestinians.

"No one is a traitor. No one is a collaborator [with Israel]. No one is an infidel," Abbas continued, strongly suggesting that anyone who has used arms against Israel, even if he vied with Fatah for leadership, was still not beyond the pale.

[Almost all Palestinians are Sunni Muslims and the term "Shi'a" in Arabic, which means faction or faction member, refers to those Muslims who broke away from the majority community after the death of Islam's leader, Muhammad, and supported Ali, Muhammad's nephew. -MW]

In what was in many ways one of the most militant speeches against Israel from a Palestinian official normally touted as a moderate, Dr. Abbas also stretched out his hand to the Hamas terror organization that has never even pretended it does not want to destroy Israel.

Dr. Abbas seemed to reject all possibilities of territorial compromise or anything less than full repatriation of Palestinian refugees, and he repudiated Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice's idea that a further Israeli withdrawal would lead to a Palestinian state inside temporary borders.

"Today more than any other day, we must hold fast to our Palestinian principles, and we will not accept a state with temporary borders" said Abbas, adding, "We will not give up one grain [of land] in Jerusalem."

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com or visit her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

THE DIPLOMACY OF THE GOLAN HEIGHTS
Posted by Kaustav Chakrabarti, January 17, 2007.
The recent speculation about Israeli-Syrian talks regarding the status of Golan Heights and the relations between the two countries have raised a quite a few eyebrows(including mine) in the international community.

The Heights were captured by Israel in the 1967 war and has ever since been the bone of contention between Israel and Syria. The acquisition of the Golan helped Israel to have a measure of security against an unfriendly neighbour that has refused to have anything to do with the Jewish state since 1948. The regime's support for various terrorist factions, is an indicator of such unfriendliness or willingness to come to terms with Israel. So there is no guarantee that the handover of the Golan would solve the ongoing tension between Israel and Syria, as the latter is bent upon discrediting Israel in every international gathering including the UNO. Moreover, as in the past (prior to 1967), the Heights could be a staging base for military actions against Israel.

The onus of peace is upon Syria. If it is serious about mending fences. It should (a) Stop supporting the terrorists (b)secure the release of kidnapped Israeli soldiers (c) denounce Iran's nuclear ambitions and denial of the Holocaust (d)Give guarantees of Druze self-determination (d) Recognize Israel. If Syria comes to grips with the reality of Israel,and abides by with some of the conditions as mentioned above, then it would be a new determinant of peace in the Middle East.

Contact the writer at kaustav12000@yahoo.co.in

To Go To Top

B'TZELEM = B'SHEKER (LIARS
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 17, 2007.

This was written by Ezra HaLevi of Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNN.com). It is called "B´Tselem Accused of Deception in Annual Report" and it appeared January 14, 2007 on Arutz Sheva.

The B'Tselem human rights group is accused by CAMERA, a media watchdog group, of using deceptive terms and selective omissions to slant the perspective of its annual report on Arab casualties.

In its December 28 press release, B'Tselem announced the main findings of its generally anti-Israel annual report: "This past year, we witnessed a deterioration in the human rights situation in the Occupied Territories, particularly in the increase in civilians killed and the destruction of the houses and infrastructure in the Gaza Strip."

The report itself does not classify those killed as civilians or terrorists, though. It chooses instead to classify Arab casualties as either "Killed when participating in hostilities" or "Did not participate in hostilities when killed."

CAMERA (The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America) contacted B'Tselem and was told by spokesperson Sarit Michaeli that this is indeed the group's policy.

According to CAMERA, until 2002, B'Tselem actually did provide separate lists of those it classified as Palestinian civilians. "In 2003, B'Tselem's loose definition of the term 'civilian' included countless Palestinians who were killed while they were in the process of attacking Israelis, including opening fire at a Bat Mitzvah celebration in Hadera, killing six and injuring 35; setting off bombs; infiltrating Israeli communities and killing or injuring residents; and fighting with Israeli troops," the CAMERA report states. "B'Tselem has since abandoned that policy -- perhaps in face of CAMERA's criticism -- but is the current practice any more credible?"

The media accuracy group reviewed the details of the two most recent months covered by the B'Tselem report. They found that not only were known wanted terrorists included in those supposedly uninvolved in hostilities, but that when conflicting reports existed as to an individual's involvement, B'Tselem consistently assumed that he was not.

B'Tselem reported, for example, that Muhammad Mahmoud Rajab a-Jarjawi, 19, who was killed Nov. 23 in Beit Lahiya, "did not participate in hostilities when killed." In fact, the report says he was "killed while on his way home from prayers, which ended at five in the morning."

The Palestinian Ma'an News Agency (as supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring) reported that day, however: "Our Gaza correspondent reported that an Israeli reconnaissance plane launched a rocket at a group of armed Palestinian resistance men who were confronting the invading Israeli tanks east of Bayt Lahiya. One of the men, Muhammad Jarjawi, 19, was killed and many others were injured."

The report includes armed terrorists in its "did not participate in hostilities" classification. One incident is described as follows (emphasis added): "Muhammad (Eid) Amin Mahmoud Ramaheh, 27-year-old resident of Ein Beit al-Maa Refugee Camp, Nablus district, killed on 14.12.2006 in Ein Beit al-Maa Refugee Camp, Nablus district, by gunfire. Did not participate in hostilities when killed. Additional information: Killed when shot at short range when he ran from his car when an undercover unit tried to arrest him. He was armed."

The IDF report that day described the incident: "The forces set up a roadblock in order to stop Ramaheh, but when Ramaheh's vehicle arrived it bypassed the roadblock and collided with another vehicle, injuring a number of civilians. As the forces approached Ramaheh's vehicle, he and one of his men opened fire at them. The soldiers returned fire, killing the two, who had been armed with an M-16 and a handgun."

Other information consistently left out of the B'Tselem report includes the membership in terrorist organizations of those killed. The IDF reported that Rahama was a head of Fatah's Tanzim terror group and was involved in terror attacks and in attempted attacks in the Shechem region.

"B'Tselem can not be relied upon as a trusted source for figures on Palestinian civilian casualties," the CAMERA report concludes. "Nor can the details it provides on the circumstances of death for Palestinian casualties be considered accurate." The complete CAMERA report is available at
www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=3&x_outlet=12&x_article=1265

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com.

To Go To Top

READ WWW.CHRISTIAN-ZIONISM.ORG TO LEARN ABOUT CHRISTIAN ZIONISM
Posted by Christian Zionism Organization, January 17, 2007.

Dear Friends,

We are excited to announce the launch of www.Christian-Zionism.org which is dedicated to telling the true story about Christian Zionism.

Anti-Christian Zionist groups, books, and articles are attempting to poison the public against Christian Zionism. http://www.Christian-Zionism.org will refute anti-Christian Zionism propaganda and reframe Christian Zionism in a positive light.

www.Christian-Zionism.org is a clearing house for Christian Zionism articles, information, organizations, and events. We encourage you to learn more about all of our Christian Zionist organizations in the Organizations section of the website. We also encourage you to sign up for our email updates under the Subscribe Now section of the website.

www.Christian-Zionism.org also provides extensive pro-Israel resources. Please visit the Resource and Links sections of the website to watch videos from Israel, download posters and cards, and learn about Israeli history.

Sincerely,

David Brog, Christians United for Israel
Earl Cox, Israel Always
Rev. James Hutchens, Jerusalem Connection International
Esther Levens, National Unity Coalition for Israel
JoAnn Magnuson, Bridges for Peace
Susan Michael, International Christian Embassy Jerusalem
Robert Stearns, Eagles Wings
Bill Sutter, The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry, Inc

Go To www.Christian-Zionism.org
email: mail@christian-zionism.org
web: http://www.christian-zionism.org

To Go To Top

VINDICATING LARRY FRANKLIN
Posted by Daily Alert, January 17, 2007.
This was written by Eli Lake and it appeared January 16, 2007 in the New York Sun
(http://www.nysun.com/article/46762).

When President Bush announced the new Iraq strategy Wednesday evening, acknowledging that Iran was effectively at war with us in Iraq by supplying terrorists with advanced improvised explosives, my thoughts turned to Lawrence Franklin.

Nearly a year ago, Judge T.S. Ellis III, sentenced this Pentagon Iran analyst to almost 13 years in a federal prison after he pleaded guilty to discussing classified information with two former lobbyists from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The case, which is thus far the Bush administration's only successful anti-leaking prosecution, illustrates the strategic confusion of our national security bureaucracy in a time of war.

Franklin, it turns out, was trying -- unconventionally -- to influence a debate in the administration in 2003 over a national security policy directive regarding Iran. He provided Aipac's Iran specialists, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, with his own list of specific instances of how Iran was sending teams from its Quds Force to sow terror, kill American soldiers, and pose a threat to Israeli operatives in northern Iraq. He hoped his list could find its way to the National Security Council, through the two lobbyists, to counter the intelligence from other channels suggesting that Iran had an interest in stabilizing Iraq.

Franklin was not a typical bureaucrat. He was dogged in his view of the Iranian threat, and he was also not averse to taking risks that would earn him the enmity of powerful foes. He risked incurring the enmity of the CIA by meeting with sources of Manucher Ghorbanifar, an Iran-Contra era figure, and, in December 2001, met with the man's sources in Rome. At the meeting, according to Franklin's friend Michael Ledeen, Franklin was told about hunter-killer teams operating against coalition forces in western Afghanistan. He delivered the intelligence personally to special forces command that month in Kabul, and, according to Mr. Ledeen, the intelligence was correct.

For his troubles, Franklin got caught up in the prosecution of two Aipac officials and has been libeled by some in the Web fringes as a spy for Israel. One of the commanders who worked closely with Franklin, General Mulholland, wrote a letter to the court last year, praising the former analyst's patriotism and diligence.

What's interesting is why Franklin took such desperate measures to make the president aware that the leading sponsor of terrorism in the world was sponsoring terrorists in a post-Saddam Iraq. Messrs. Weissman and Rosen were leading proponents in the 1990s of the view that Iran's sponsorship of international terrorism could be modified through diplomatic sticks and carrots -- the inverse of Franklin's view that the Islamic Republic was genetically predisposed to use terrorism as statecraft.

One reason was that in 2002, the Bush administration, as part of its efforts to coordinate the Iraqi opposition, was resigned to working with Iran's proxies, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and the Dawa party. This decision locked America into an impossible position. Mr. Bush was betting that Iran would have an interest in stabilizing Iraq because the groups closest to Iran would be brought into the government to replace Saddam Hussein. The kind of analysis Franklin was providing would scuttle a policy built around the presumption that Iran shared our interests in Iraq.

That presumption has cost the White House a good part of its strategic coherence. On the one hand, the president has at times acknowledged the malicious role the Iranians play in Iran, he has lent his voice at times to the struggle of Iranian democrats, and he has authorized paltry sums of cash for meetings about the Iranian opposition. On the other hand, Secretary Rice in 2005 ordered our envoy in Baghdad, Ambassador Khalilzad, to open a direct channel with his Iranian counterpart and placed hopes for modifying Iranian behavior in a United Nations Security Council resolution. America has pledged up to now to respond to the threat Iran poses in Baghdad by talking to bureaucrats in Geneva, Paris, and London. Then last month, we changed our strategy. Suddenly America is responding to the Iranian threat in Iraq by going after Iran's outposts and missions. It may be too late. As the National Security Council's power point summary of the new strategy says, Iran has been "burrowing" its agents deep inside the new Iraqi government. Iran has proven that it is not averse to working with the Sunni car bombers who kill Shiites and with the Shiite militias who kill Sunnis. Iran's Quds Force turns out to be playing both sides of the Iraqi civil war.

This news has been ignored and disbelieved by those lawmakers advocating a "diplomatic surge." But it would not likely come as a surprise to Franklin, a Persian speaker who now parks cars and works odd jobs, as he awaits final word on the jail sentence he earned for trying to get word of all this to a president who failed to grasp what Franklin was trying to tell him.

To Go To Top

<>bJUST WHO EXACTLY IS A "MODERATE" ARAB LEADER?
Posted by Michael Freund, January 17, 2007.

On her current trip to the Middle East, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been meeting with a series of Arab leaders, patting each one on the back and heaping praise on them for their supposed "moderation".

But just who is a "moderate Arab leader", and is Secretary Rice making a grave mistake when she applies this term to those with whom she meets? Read my column below from the Jerusalem Post and find out.

This article appeared today in The Jerusalem Post
(www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467747950&pagename= JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull). Comments and feedback may be sent to: letters@jpost.com or to me directly at msfreund@netvision.net.il.

thanks,

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has come and gone on her latest visit to the Middle East, but about the only thing she left behind was a trail of confusion and bewilderment.

Prior to Rice's arrival, her trip was billed as an effort to bolster "moderate Arab leaders" in the area. On January 9, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters that one of the secretary's goals would be to "support those forces of moderation in the region."

That sounds reasonable enough. After all, the Middle East could certainly use a healthy dose of restraint.

But after watching Ms. Rice's performance over the past few days, it should now be clear that her idea of what constitutes a "moderate Arab leader" is way off the mark, and this should leave us all deeply concerned about the future.

Take, for example, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whom Rice put forward as a model of moderation.

Standing next to Abbas at a press conference in Ramallah on Sunday, the secretary of state practically gushed with enthusiasm when she said in her opening remarks, "I want everyone to know, particularly the Palestinian people, how much we admire the leadership of President Abbas as a leader of the Palestinian people."

And yet, it was just last Thursday, three days prior to meeting with Rice, that Abbas publicly called upon Palestinians to attack Israel.

SPEAKING at a rally to mark the 42nd anniversary of the founding of Fatah, Abbas told a huge crowd gathered in Ramallah, "With the will and determination of its sons, Fatah will continue. We will not give up our principles and we have said that rifles should be directed against the occupation."

"We have a legitimate right to direct our guns against Israeli occupation," Abbas added.

Is this the kind of "moderation" Rice had in mind?

Indeed, despite Abbas's outrageous call to arms, Rice did not say a word -- not a single, solitary word! -- about it during her joint press conference with him. She did not see fit to demand a retraction from Abbas of his invitation to violence, nor did she press him to refrain from inciting further bloodshed.

Instead, Rice chose to heap additional praise on Abbas, telling the assembled journalists that "we've made a lot of progress over recent years, in particular because of the hard work of President Abbas."

Huh?

What progress is she referring to? To the ongoing Palestinian rocket attacks against southern Israel? To the kidnapping of Cpl. Gilad Shalit? Or perhaps to the growing popularity of Hamas and Islamic Jihad among the Palestinian electorate?

To be sure, when one compares Abbas with the "genocide now" crowd over at Hamas, he might appear to be a tad bit less extreme. But the gap between "less extreme" and "moderate" is vast, and the two cannot and should not be confused.

AND THEREIN lies the problem with Rice's misguided compliments to Abbas. By embracing him rather than rebuking him, she encouraged the Palestinian leader to believe that he can openly call for violence against Jews without paying any political price for doing so.

Her actions also sent a dangerous message to Palestinians, who might start to think that America's top diplomat sees nothing wrong with their leader's plea to start using their rifles against the Jewish state.

Rice's confused idea of "moderation" was further on display in Egypt, where she met on Monday with Egyptian autocrat Hosni Mubarak and his foreign minister, Aboul Gheit.

Later, at a press conference with Gheit, Rice again had nothing but praise for her hosts, asserting that, "Egypt is really a partner."

What she neglected to mention, of course, was that Mr. Mubarak rules his domain in the finest tradition of the Pharaohs, suppressing dissent, tossing his political opponents into prison, and fixing the outcome of elections to his liking.

Egypt has also allowed untold quantities of weapons to be smuggled freely into Gaza, into the waiting arms of terrorist groups, and it has refused to crack down on the flow of funds to Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Some "partner."

We are sure to be treated to a continuation of this spectacle in the coming days, as Rice travels to the Gulf to meet with other "moderates" such as the terror-sponsoring Saudis and some of their Israel-boycotting neighbors.

AND THAT should have us all deeply worried, because the issue of just who is a moderate Arab leader is far more than just one of semantics. It goes to the very root of US foreign policy in the region. For by misidentifying or mischaracterizing various Arab leaders as "moderates,"

Rice and others do real harm to the very cause they seek to advance.

Rather than encouraging moderation, they are in fact unwittingly promoting extremism by failing to call to account leaders such as Abbas, Mubarak and others.

And by blurring the definition of true moderation, they have allowed these men to continue to pursue policies that are antithetical to Israel and the West, all while continuing to bask in the undeserved political support they receive from abroad.

The question of "just who exactly is a moderate Arab leader," and whether any really exist, remains open to debate.

But by conferring this title upon despots and dictators, and those who sponsor terror, the US secretary of state is doing far more damage than good.

Michael Freund served as an adviser to former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

To Go To Top

BEWARE OF A BROKEN IRAQ
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 16, 2007.

Facts on the ground suggest a broken Iraq cannot be glued together when the pieces are incompatible. Religious Sunnis and Shiites, disputing successors of Mohammad for thirteen centuries, are about as likely to see eye to eye as elephants will soon learn to fly. All the superglue made by U.S. President Bush and his tacticians will not put a turbaned sword wielding Humpty Dumpty back together again, especially after the Humpty Shiites have for decades been dumped on by Sadist Hussein and his Dumpty Baathist Sunnis. The secular Kurds want nothing to do with the religious Sunnis and Shiites, indeed are finding their ways very nicely in a region known as Kurdistan. Any pie in the sky neo-con advisor disputing the obvious is leading us down a yellow brick road with a grim fairy tale that will continue to burst apart letting no one live happily ever after.

There are realistic solutions to this mess however; just ask U.S. Senate wizard Joe Biden who is no longer biding his time, will likely go after the big brass Presidential ring due to arrive in 2008, and presciently suggests separating the three incompatible Iraqi tribes into three loosely connected regions, no doubt sharing a Koranucopia of petrodollars traded for its carbon based elixir, voraciously imbibed by the industrial world, flowing underneath heretofore blood soaked desert, compliments of Martyrs Inc. Alas, if that doesn't work, the Middle East will likely make Dante's Inferno look like a Boy Scout bon fire, once the American cavalry sings happy trails and heads West, creating a power vacuum that will suck in mad Mahmoud and his Persian Shiite Revolutionary Guard brandishing misguided anti-Sunni missiles, perhaps of the Dr. Strangelove variety. The House of Saud, sensing its vast mostly Sunni neighborhood could fall like a house of cards, will jettison its own jihad junkies into the mix; perhaps followed by Turkish troops, more concerned that sovereign Kurds abutting their nation's border will inspire Turkey's own discontented Kurdish citizens to run afoul of the law, attempt to secede, thus such troops will be inclined to preemptively knock the stuffing out of those free bird Kurdish troublemakers to the proximate south.

Lets not ignore Russian Papa Bear Putin who is not likely to stay on the sidelines as his continent implodes. Will he supply Iran with sophisticated weaponry to defeat Sunni forces, cognizant of a consequential opportunity to share power with a Persian Shiite empire in the making thus asserting more control over the market price of oil, holding the industrial world over a barrel? Cold war paybacks can be brutal as a resurrected Soviet empire strikes back with a vengeance. You can take Vladimir out of the KGB but you can't take the KGB out of Vladimir, fixing to rumble with the petro-ruble. Furthermore, might such a scenario play out without all the other superpowers and superpower wannabes East and West flexing Big Kahuna biceps, surfing into the melee with self-serving agendas, attempting to ride the wake of an Islamic tsunami without breaking their boards of directors scared silly by broken-pipeline phobia, a twenty-first century ailment with prehistoric origins?

The one wild card in all this is Israel. How will the beleaguered Jewish State fair if a broken Iraq so upsets the balance of power within a Middle East jihad infected jungle virtually everything destabilizes, disintegrating all restraints? If mad Mahmoud AhMADinejad is a man of his word, 'wiping Israel off the map' will be a priority. It thus behooves the imperiled Jewish State to be ever vigilant, striking first if necessary. Yet there is one silver lining as dark clouds ominously threaten to burst violently creating that immense world-class tsunami. Shrinking oil prices, indeed far more subtle than jihad, yet over time just as potent, could cause a financially strapped Iran to abandon its jihadist military ambitions, thus abort any chain of events leading to catastrophic consequences. Putin's own ambitions would likewise be stifled, as Russia's fossil fuel revenue sector would similarly be dealt a substantial blow. The entire world, including Israel, would then be spared the wrath of an Islamic Rasputin, allied with its strange Soviet bedfellow, bent on planetary conquest. Perhaps all civil nations could consequently live happily ever, but only father time will tell. The morale to this story is 'be prepared'; one never knows which way the wind blows.

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

THIS IS A SHANDA!
Posted by Daryl Temkin, January 16, 2007.

There is something "in" about using words outside of the English language. At one time, French words would creep into our political vocabulary -- as when Henry Kissinger introduced the word "détente", a relaxing of political tension.

In recent years, we are no longer adding to our French vocabulary, and mostly Arabic has become the trendy or in vogue source of words. Now we have become familiar with such colorful words as "jihad", "intifada", "burka", "hijab", and "Ramadan" -- - just to name a few.

Prior to both the French and Arabic words of the day, the Yiddish language brought a new tonality to understanding and describing various emotions. A variety of articles and even books have been written to explain the wide range of Yiddish additions found scattered within the English language.

At this time, there is one powerful Yiddish word which is most fitting to enter into the English lexicon. The word is "shanda," pronounced, "shan- dah". Like many descriptive Yiddish words, there is a simple definition and then a much broader definition. The simple word definition is "shame or embarrassment", but the more enhanced definition is, "How dare you do what you did?" A shanda refers to an action which has no trace of wisdom or legitimate reason for having occurred. Severe guilt and embarrassment must be attached to this situation or there will be nothing learned or gained. A shanda is a shame of such magnitude that the fact that it happened once is already too much.

Nothing is acceptable about a shanda because it is a moral injustice, and even more compelling, anyone who attempts to justify a shanda, is worthy of being cut off. A shanda is a despicable act and deserves a very strong consequential response, similar to a parent shouting so loud at their errant child that the entire neighborhood hears of the wrongful act.

It's not easy to achieve the "shanda" status. Typically, one has to "work hard" to arrive at such a nadir. In order for a shanda to be a shanda, it has to have the "merit" to really stand out in the general category of "low grade behaviors". The competition for such an "award" can be fierce, but the winner will generally display qualities that are unquestionably outstanding. The public's judgment will often establish a "shanda finalist award" which could take place monthly or weekly, and hopefully not, daily. Unfortunately, in reference to the Middle East, we live in a time when devastating shandas are occurring much too frequently.

This past week was astonishing. America proclaimed its gift of $84 million dollars and a rich supply of new weapons to Mr. Abbas, the Palestinian President. America claimed this gift would be used only to fight the Hamas terrorists. In appreciation, Mr. Abbas, Arafat's right hand man from the inception of the PLO, gave a public speech at the 42nd Anniversary celebration of Fatah's creation. In that speech, Mr. Abbas declared that the American gift of weapons and money would certainly be used for the destruction of Israel.

Mr. Abbas, the falsely termed "moderate", cried out for unity among the warring Palestinian factions telling them to stop killing each other and to focus their guns on destroying their "common enemy", Israel. He let it be known that the new weapons will be pointed in one direction for the destruction of the occupying Israelis. Once again, the agenda for destroying terrorism was set aside for the agenda of destroying Israel.

What was the shanda? That with few exceptions, the world media chose not to report the Abbas declaration as to where these weapons would be pointed. The Shanda was that the world media chose to report the first part of Abbas' statement making him sound like he is the "great unifier" stating that he wants the conflicting Palestinian factions to come together and to stop killing each other. That makes Abbas sound like he is a fine, moderate, responsible, and peace seeking leader. The world media, in order to maintain their "liberal" political illusion, censored the next part of the Abbas statement where he commanded the Palestinians to point their new American assault rifles at Israel. This is a shanda!

Again, the world media chose to protect Abbas and project the American and European Union illusionary message. The falsely believed "fair and balanced" liberal-minded media which supports the political discourse works to continue the lie and the fantasy that Abbas wants to conquer and disarm the terrorists. The media is so bold that they commit their sly deception right in the face of Abbas clearly admitting the truth. This is a shanda!

As days passed, the Abbas words were heard by enough alternative news sources that Condoleeza Rice was confronted with this information. She responded stating that America will be in control of how these weapons will be used. We are now asked to believe that America now has the ability to direct which way a rifle in the hands of a Palestinian "freedom fighter" is pointed and which way the bullets will fly. This is a shanda!

And then, in spite of Abbas clearly stating his leadership intentions, in spite of the well known information that Hamas and Fatah are often inter- mixed, in spite of numerous Palestinian leaders declaring the same message that Abbas spoke, and in spite of the history of abuse of past arms gifts to the Palestinians, America is still going forward with its plans. On top of this, in the same speech, Condoleeza Rice praised the furtherance of the "Road Map". She pointed out that "Israel's implementation of the Road Map has already succeeded in forcing Israel to expel Jewish residents and destroy their communities in the Gaza region. They are out of Gaza. And so I think we want to look at what is still to be achieved." So now the Gaza expulsion is considered part of the Road Map and Condi is awaiting the next expulsion. This is a shanda!

Then, for icing on the cake, Time Magazine reported that Ms. Rice suggested that the Road Map go forward and that the first step of the Road Map be skipped since it is not being accomplished. The first step of the road map requires the terrorists be disarmed and the teaching of Israel and Jew hatred be stopped. Ms. Rice was willing to skip the most important foundational requirements for the Palestinians to fulfill and therefore was willing to establish a Palestinian state embedded with anti- Israel hate and limitless terrorism. This is a shanda!

Usually, a shanda is something of such magnitude that among responsible people it rarely happens. However, within the Israeli-Arab conflict, shandas have been happening not only once a month or once a week, but now several times a day.

A shanda is such a moral infraction that it requires a response of yelling and screaming. A shanda is the very thing that one can not sit back and say, "So -- what else is new?" A shanda is an event that must not go unnoticed and un-reprimanded. The Jewish and non-Jewish world has to scream about the absurdity and the immoral nature of this $84 million dollar American gift of money plus weapons for the spread of terrorism. And, there has to be yelling and screaming about all the other shandas as well.

If we remain silent in the face of shandas of the above named magnitude, then the "doors of immorality" will be left wide open for something of even greater horrendous magnitude to occur. The human race cannot afford this. Complacency in the face of a serious shanda must not be tolerated. These types of shandas must be receive a powerful reprimand that will not only be heard throughout a neighborhood, but will be heard and understood throughout the world.

Daryl Temkin, Ph.D. is the director of the Israel Education Institute which is devoted to teaching history and contemporary issues of Israel to Jews and Non-Jews. Dr. Temkin can be reached at: DT@Israel-Institute.com.

To Go To Top

IRAQ, IRAN AND THE STRATEGY OF DEFEAT
Posted by Unity Coalition for Israel, January 16, 2007.

This is by Mark Silverberg.

America is discovering that the road to victory in Iraq runs through Tehran and Damascus. It is also discovering that a military strategy based on a "limited war" doctrine and confined to Iraq cannot defeat an Iranian enemy engaged in a broader war of conquest.

The asymmetry of fighting a "limited war" in an existential conflict first surfaced during the Truman administration in its confrontation with communist North Korea. When the Chinese drove the UN army out of North Korea in its quest to conquer the South, Truman (to the surprise of the Chinese) failed to escalate the conflict and adopted the limited objective of fighting the war in South Korea rather than destroying the enemy to the north. As a result, American forces quickly became bogged down in a defensive South Korean conflict with no clear end to the war in sight.

In 1961, President Kennedy and his brain trust of social theorists including Robert McNamara, McGeorge Bundy, Dean Rusk, George Ball and others institutionalized this policy of "limited war" as the doctrine of "flexible response." It assumed that the enemy would "get the message" that America was determined to fight based on a gradual escalation of the conflict depending upon the extent of the threat.

Unfortunately, "flexible response" did not take into account that the North Vietnamese (like al Qaeda, Iran and Hamas today) were ideologically committed to total victory and were prepared do whatever was necessary to achieve it -- short of their own destruction. While Ho Chi Minh set out to wage total war on the South, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson treated the conflict not as existential (which it was for South Vietnam) but as limited. As a result, five hundred thousand American troops were confined to a strategically defensive stance in South Vietnam (as in Korea) with no thought of marching on Hanoi. By failing to threaten the continued existence of the North Vietnamese Communist government, North Vietnamese leaders were able to drag out the war until America's will to fight was broken by its own anti-war propaganda at home.

This same failed "limited war" strategy has dogged American strategic war doctrine ever since. During the Iranian embassy crisis, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini disclosed that he had no fear of an American army marching on Tehran since President Carter's only serious response to the hostage-taking was to impose ineffectual diplomatic and economic sanctions, an embargo on Iranian oil and a break in diplomatic relations.

President Clinton also followed the "limited war" approach even as Americans were being harvested by Islamic terrorists from New York to Saudi Arabia to Kenya. He sent cruise missiles to blow up empty tents in the Afghan desert and pharmaceutical factories in the Sudan, signed agreements with dictators based on the belief that America would somehow be "safe", hamstrung American intelligence services in the name of civil liberties, shrunk the American military in the name of economy, and chose to use the courts as the battleground, rather than engaging with the terrorists and taking the war to them and their sponsors.

This doctrine has now been transposed onto Iraq. How can America possibly win a "limited war" in Iraq when its enemies (Iran and Syria) and their terrorist proxies (al Qaeda and Hezbollah) are committed to undermining American efforts there and are pursuing "total war" against them with the intention of driving them from the region and establishing a global Islamic Caliphate? America has limited its war objectives to stabilizing, democratizing and reconstructing Iraq before it has vanquished those in Iran and Syria who are doing all in their power to see the American enterprise fail. If the American people have grown weary of Iraq, it is because the average American sees no merit in having a national debate on how to wage a futile war. Americans want victory and like it or not, the road to victory leads through Tehran and Damascus. The American public will never support a war predicated upon a limited, drawn out and failed war strategy against an enemy dedicated to the destruction of American influence in the Middle East. Destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities, capturing its oil fields, destroying its government offices and regime change are absolutely critical if Iraq is to be secured and the larger war against Islamic fascism is to be won. America's enemies (specifically Iran and Syria) must be convinced that the price of pursuing conquest in Iraq or elsewhere in the world is simply too high a price for them to pay.

If the United States sends a message that it considers victory in Iraq too costly to pursue, how then can Iran and Syria be blamed for concluding that Washington may be unwilling to pay the costs of avoiding defeat? During World War II, it would have been unthinkable for allied forces to have stopped at the German border after liberating France without destroying Adolf Hitler, the Nazi war machine and the entire cult of Aryan supremacy.

In the final analysis, just as Israel will eventually be required to vanquish the terrorist infrastructures in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon if Israelis are to be secure in their homeland, so America will be required to carry this war to Iran and Syria if it is to end the threat they and their proxies represent to Iraq and the world. Iraq can and never will be stabilized so long as these nations are free to undermine American interests and pursue their global Islamic war.

The Unity Coalition for Israel (http://www.israelunitycoalition.org) is "the largest worldwide coalition of Jewish and Christian organizations, with more than 200 groups representing millions of people dedicated to Israel. Though we have many different backgrounds, we have one common goal: A Safe and Secure Israel."

"Israel is not just a Jewish issue. Millions of Christians resolutely endorse the principle of peace with security for the state of Israel. Because we work closely together and speak with a united voice, our message is being heard!"

To Go To Top

WHEN APPEASEMENT BECOMES RACISM
Posted by David Frankfurter, January 16, 2007.

It is a fundamental right of every individual to be judged equally amongst his peers. Without it, democracy becomes unsustainable. And yet, multiple standards are almost intrinsic to human nature. Double standards infect almost every realm of human endeavour. A prime example is the use of human shields.

Outlawed by the Geneva Conventions, the use of human shields is decried by all. The former UN Secretary General, Kofi Anan, denounced the use of human shields by guerilla rebels in refugee camps of West Timor.

So what action was taken in Palestinian villages presided over by the UN? UNWRA headquarters in Jenin was used as cover for Palestinians to shoot at IDF soldiers. Human shields were, and are, a common tool. Terrorists were even caught opening fire while taking cover behind a woman holding an UNWRA flag.

How was UN condemnation phrased on this occasion? The Weekly Standard described it well. Local UN officials fabricated an Israeli army "massacre" of "unarmed civilians" and UNRWA Commissioner General Peter Hansen gave dozens of lip-smacking interviews recounting his eye witness account of Israeli atrocities. But the Weekly Standard concluded, based on foreign journalist and international observer evidence, that Hansen "is a bald-faced liar."

This determination to vilify Israel and exonerate Palestinian fabrication is evidenced in any event where Palestinians being used as human shields are accidentally killed -- whether by Israelis as collateral damage or by Palestinian "work accidents." Deep indignation is loudly shouted. By contrast, Palestinian murder of deliberately targeted Israelis is addressed by a muted voice whispering mild concern.

The Palestinians have well understood that the international the media and politicians will grant rewards for every civilian death in their struggle against Israel -- whether of Jew or Arab. President Mahmoud Abbas publicly declared that Palestinians must avoid civil war, and turn their guns against Israelis. And the world declares amen to depictions of this man as a "moderate" deserving of hundreds of millions in arms and military training. Media reports adopt his language: " Jerusalem church leaders alarmed at worsening relations between two main political parties are calling for an end to violence and an urgent return to the "real priorities" of Palestinians." Code words lifted almost directly from the Palestinian leader's speeches; quickly translated: Stop killing each other and get back to killing Jews.

The human shields themselves have also reached a new level of boldness and sophistication. Knowing that Israel will avoid killing "innocent" civilians, they call for the murder of their Israeli counterparts, while protecting terrorists and arms caches with their homes and their bodies.

In recent months, Israeli security forces have used telephone calls to warn Palestinian militants and others near alleged militant safe houses and weapons caches, giving them up to a half hour to evacuate. When militia leader Mohammed Baroud got the call Saturday, he enlisted neighbors to protect his house from the Israeli military. They've now set up a system of shifts to protect the house around the clock.

"This kind of [peaceful] resistance cannot replace the rocket resistance," says Jamila Shanti, a female member of Hamas who helped organize a permanent presence of female human shields around the house. "The popular resistance is to protect the people from the bombing. The rocket resistance is to confront the Israeli machinery." ( http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1120/p01s02-wome.html)

The US, on the other hand, solves the dilemma by simply following the rules of war. According to the Geneva conventions, as Kofi Anan pointed out in Timor, armies are not required to protect human shields. Whether in Afghanistan, Iraq, or more recently Somalia, the results have been devastating. But the world quietly applies the international standard, as long as the attacker is "one of us." Israel, as "the other," must respect human shields deliberately hiding terrorists and their weapons. Palestinians, "the lesser," are not up to these international ethical norms. Using human shields and murdering civilians are minor faults which cannot be allowed to distract the flow of international aid.

However you slice it -- that's racism.

David Frankfurter is a business consultant, corporate executive and writer who frequently comments on the Middle East. To subscribe to his 'Letter from Israel', email him at david.frankfurter@iname.com. Or go to http://www.livejournal.com/users/dfrankfurter/

To Go To Top

CHINA'S JEWISH HERITAGE UNCOVERED
Posted by Alfred Ritter, January 16, 2007.

This article comes from BBC Monitoring, which is based in Caversham in southern England. It selects and translates information from radio, television, press, news agencies and the Internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages.

Many relics of China's Jewish community are in good condition

Little remains of China's once flourishing Jewish communities, yet many of their cultural artefacts are remarkably well preserved, a study by Chinese historians has revealed.

According to the Chinese news agency Xinhua, a recent survey in the northeastern city of Harbin reveals that hundreds of buildings built by the city's Jewish community in the early 20th century have survived practically unscathed.

Harbin is also home to the biggest Jewish cemetery in the Far East, boasting 700 gravestones with clearly legible Hebrew inscriptions.

Local historian Zhang Tiejiang said the survival of such extensive cultural remains gave the lie to Western assumptions that China's Jewish heritage had been destroyed after the Communists came to power in 1949.

"Westerners know little about Jewish people in China, creating a vacancy for the study of world Jewish history," Mr Zhang said. A long association

European Jews first arrived in China in the Middle Ages, many of them settling in the central city of Kaifeng. A Torah in Chinese from the Kaifeng synagogue can now be seen in the British Museum.

The less well-known Jewish community in Harbin grew up at the beginning of the 20th century when large numbers of Russian Jews arrived to help build railways in northeastern China.

During World War II, many Jews fleeing Nazi persecution settled in Shanghai, a city which still has a synagogue and a recently opened Jewish museum.

Reporting on the results of the survey Xinhua quoted a Harbin official as saying that the Chinese people had always done what they could to preserve the remains of Jewish culture.

"There was a harmonious relationship between Jews and Chinese half a century ago. After the Jews left China, the Chinese people voluntarily protected their heritage," Gao Yingxiang told the news agency.

Improving ties

Although most of China's Jews left during the 1950s, the Chinese government now recognises Jews as an official ethnic group, and the Harbin survey comes at a time when China is seeking to improve its ties with Israel.

Relations between the two countries were frosty for many decades after the war, but the last few years have seen a marked thaw.

The visit by Chinese President Jiang Zemin to Israel earlier this year represented a further stage in this process.

During his visit, Mr Jiang -- wearing a Jewish skull-cap -- laid a wreath at Yad Vashem, Israel's national memorial to the 6 million Jews killed in the holocaust.

Contact Alfred Ritter at alfwritt@comcast.net

To Go To Top

BUSTING ARAB-ISRAEL PEACE-MAKING MYTHS
Posted by David Haimson, January 16, 2007.

This was written by David Makovsky and it appeared in the Jerusalem Post as an Opinion piece today. It is archived at
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1167467739679& pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

David Markovsky is a former editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post, and is currently director of the Project on the Middle East Peace Process at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, where his latest monograph is "Lessons and Implications of the Lebanon War: A Preliminary Assessment (2006)." The above is excerpted from a piece he wrote for bitterlemons-international.org

As Condoleezza Rice visits the region, she should dispel some of the mythology that exists in the Arab world on Middle East peacemaking. 1. If Israel does not go to final status talks, this shows it does not want peace. This is the reductionist, land-driven narrative that sees gradualism as an Israeli plot. It received a boost in the US last year due to contributions by American academics who are not Middle East experts (Walt/Mearsheimer) and by former president Jimmy Carter. This narrative conveniently ignores the fact that some of the biggest obstacles to resolving this conflict in 2000 were not land, but issues of refugees and security. Through land swaps, land seems the most easily resolved of these issues.

The other issues helped doom the talks in 2000 and seem even less resolvable now. Apart from the impasse on refugees, security is a problem as well. From the Israeli side, how could the IDF withdraw from virtually the entire West Bank when 1,000 Kassam rockets have fallen on Israel from Gaza since its 2005 pullout? The distinction that Israel views final status talks as desirable but not feasible is seldom heard in the Arab world, even if the difference is heaven and earth. 2. Everyone knows what the solution is, but the parties just do not know how to get there. This makes it sound as if all that is missing is a book on diplomatic etiquette. In fact, rejectionism and terrorism are not marginal phenomena, as Hamas currently heads the Palestinian Authority government.

3. The Arabs states are for peace. They put forward the Arab Initiative in 2002. It is axiomatic that Arab leaders will urge Rice to press Israel, but it is far from clear that they will do their share. Even though the Arab Initiative is an improvement on the past, there is no doubt that this is a very asymmetrical peace plan.

The initiative requires Israel first to do all the front-loaded work by getting out of the West Bank and Golan Heights, with Arab reciprocation delayed, hence less binding. This process would be far more effective if Arab states were to take parallel steps to reinforce progress on all sides. This would bolster the center among Israel and the Palestinians, providing the latter with key political cover. If the Quartet's road map is to be revived, it should be matched by an Arab road map. 4. The whole problem of the Arab-Israel conflict is that Israel enjoys too much support in Washington. The Walt/Mearsheimer/Carter thesis is a familiar echo of what famed American historian Richard Hofstadter described in his essay, "The Paranoid Strain in American Politics," about the American right's scapegoating of liberals as communists during the McCarthy period.

Perhaps it is not surprising that scapegoating occurs during periods of turmoil like the Iraq War, but it is also unfair. American Jews did not stop Bill Clinton from proposing the partitioning of Jerusalem in 2000, for example.

5. Everything in the Middle East is linked to the Arab-Israel conflict. Since September 11, 2001, the American public has been treated to an endless seminar on the Arab world. Its conclusion has been that Islamism has very deep cultural and political roots, linked to dysfunctionalism in Arab regimes but not driven by the Arab-Israel conflict.

The 2000-2004 intifada did not cause a single Arab regime to fall; al-Qaida prepared its plots at the height of US peacemaking in the Middle East in the 1990s. The Sunni insurgency in Iraq's Anbar province is not driven by the dynamics of Israelis and Palestinians.

The US should be involved in the search for a two-state solution not because of Iraq, but because it wants to find problem-solving solutions that give dignity to both Israelis and Palestinians alike.

An elevated debate that avoids unchallenged slogans as well as a carefully orchestrated policy that avoids the pitfalls ahead could even prove Santayana's Middle East corollary to be wrong.

Contact David Haimson at DvHaimson@aol.com to receive emails with direct links to articles on Israel that are well-worth reading.

To Go To Top

BROKEN COVENANT
Posted by David Haimson, January 16, 2007.
Broken Covenant:
American Foreign Policy and the Crisis Between the U.S. and Israel

by Moshe Arens -- Simon & Schuster 1995

From the cover:

In this no-holds-barred account, Moshe Arens, Israel's former Foreign Minister and Defense Minister, lays bare the harsh realities of U.S.-Israeli relations during the tumultuous period of the Palestinian uprising known as the Intifada and the climatic Persian Gulf War. during those years, diplomatic relations between Jerusalem and Washington plummeted, as President George Bush's administration, in pursuit of U.S. interests in the Middle East, interfered in Israeli domestic politics, refused Israel vital military intelligence during the Gulf War, and attempted to bring down Israel's democratically elected government.

In January 1989, just weeks before Moshe Arens became Foreign Minister, the U.S. government began a dialogue with Yasser Arafat's infamous terrorist group, the PLO.

At the time, the Intifada was in full swing in the occupied territories west of the Jordan River, and Israel's new Likud-led coalition government was eager to begin peace negotiations with the Palestinians, as well as with the surrounding Arab countries that were at war with Israel.

Arens charges that the opposition Labor Party, led by Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, was increasingly willing to make concessions to Israel's Arab neighbors that would weaken Israel's national security. Secretary of State James Banker and President Bush circumvented, and ultimately undermined the legitimate Israeli leadership in Jerusalem by entering into backdoor negotiations with Rabin and Peres, who were willing to accede to Arab demands for PLO representation at the negotiating table. As a direct result, Israel's coalition government fell apart in early 1990, and Shamir was forced to form a new government in which Arens became Defense Minister.

When Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990, the U.S. began a pattern that would continue throughout the Gulf War, refusing to provide Israel with military intelligence on Iraqi troop movements and missile launcher sites, even as Israel was being attacked. The U.S. gave repeated assurances that they would eliminate the Scud threat to Israel, yet missiles continued to fall within Israel's borders for six weeks. Arens's efforts to deploy Israel's own military forces were constantly rejected by U.S. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and other members of the Bush administration. In the meantime, while the U.S. raised funds for Arab countries that had been economically weakened by the war, Israel received almost to economic aid.

After the war, as Israel's peace effort resumed, Shamir and Arens continued to resist external pressure to make unwarranted concessions to the Arabs. The Bush administration resorted to strong-arm tactics to force its peace agenda on the Israeli government, delaying a ten-billion-dollar loan guarantee intended to help Israel absorb recently arrived Soviet immigrants until U.S. terms were met. In the end, U.S. manipulation of Israel's internal political situation helped bring down the Shamir-Arens government in the 1992 elections and effectively restored the more conciliatory Labor Party to power. The rejection of Bush's policy toward Israel by American voters committed to the U.S.-Israel alliance contributed to the defeat of Bush in the U.S. elections that followed.

Moshe Arens served as Israel's Ambassador to Washington from 1982 to 1983, and as a member of the Israeli government from 1983 to 1992. He was Defense Minister from 1983 to 1984, Foreign Minister from 1988 to 1990, and again Defense Minister from 1990 to 1992. Contact David Haimson at DvHaimson@aol.com to receive emails with direct links to articles on Israel that are well-worth reading.

To Go To Top

GOOGLE EARTH MAP MARKS TEMPLE MOUNT AS PALESTINIAN
Posted by Dawn Treader, January 16, 2007.

This comes from today's World Net Daily (WND) and was written by Aaron Klein, of their Jerusalem Bureau.

JERUSALEM -- While Jerusalem serves as Israel's capital, and the Temple Mount is located within Israeli sovereignty, the popular satellite map program Google Earth divides the city and places the Mount -- Judaism's holiest site -- within Palestinian territory.

Interactive Google Earth maps mark eastern sections of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount as "occupied territory," set to become part of a future Palestinian state.

Google Earth states it demarcates its maps according to international standards, but no Israeli-Palestinian negotiations -- even the failed Camp David final-status negotiations in 2000 -- ever placed the Temple Mount within Palestinian territory.

Google Earth map shows Temple Mount on Arab side of Jerusalem

The United Nations considers eastern sections of Jerusalem, recaptured by Israel during the 1967 Six Day War, to be "disputed." The Israeli Knesset officially annexed the entire city of Jerusalem as its capital in 1980.

"Google Earth is reinforcing lies," Rabbi Chaim Rechman, director of the international department at Israel's Temple Institute, told WND.

"The Muslims have engaged in a systemic campaign to re-write history and erase any traces of Judaism from the Temple Mount in total disregard to all actual archeological and historic evidence," he continued." Now Google Earth has given in to this campaign."

Jerusalem first was divided into eastern and western sections when Jordan invaded and occupied the city and the Temple Mount area in 1947, expelling all Jewish inhabitants. Israel originally built its capital in the western part of the city, while the eastern quarters remained under Jordanian control until Israel regained them in 1967.

'Racist Israel stealing Palestinian water'

Google Earth does not limit its input in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Jerusalem alone.

The Gaza Strip is labeled by Google Earth as "Israeli occupied," even though the Jewish state withdrew from Gaza in August 2005.

TotallyJewish.com, a UK-based Jewish website, pointed out an interactive Google Earth map of an Israeli community in the northern West Bank features integrated user comments implying Jews are stealing water from neighboring Palestinians.

A posting on a Google map next to the town of Kiryat Arba, near the ancient city of Hebron, states: "Note the well-tended lawns in a region deprived of water."

Clicking on a weblink in the posting brings the user to a site stating, "The principal reason for the water shortage is an unfair distribution of water resources shared by Israel and the Palestinians."

The posting decries Israel's purported water-confiscation practices as "illegal" and "racist," even though dozens of major Israeli aquifers, many run by the Jewish National Fund, purify water running through Palestinian cities and return the cleaned water to the Palestinian towns.

Comments on other Google Earth images claim Israel plans to divide parts of Bethlehem, even though no such plan exist.

Google Earth is also accused of showing falsified images. Visitors to Google Earth who click on an area just outside Jerusalem can view a computer-generated image claiming to depict an Israeli missile factory.

Israeli defense officials told WND the "missile factory" is a fabrication.

Google Earth could not immediately be reached for comment since its corporate offices were closed today in observance of Martin Luther King Day.

A Google spokeswoman previously told TotallyJewish.com comments and pictures on satellite maps can be switched off if visitors don't want to see them. She said the company would investigate the offending postings.

Referring to Google erroneously labeling the Gaza Strip as occupied, the spokeswoman said, "Borders and place names are not always updated straightaway. Occasionally there are discrepancies. We are happy to receive feedback and will pass it on to the Google Earth team and take the necessary steps."

Terror leader: 'Congratulations to Google Earth'

Mort Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, accused Google Earth of encouraging terrorism.

"When the Arab terrorists see Google Earth's falsification of geographic realities, they will be appeased and encouraged because these kinds of lying maps send the message that their disinformation campaigns and their terrorism work," Klein told WND.

Indeed, Abu Nasser, second-in-command of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, said he was "thrilled" by Google Earth's depictions.

"Congratulations to Google Earth," Abu Nasser told WND.

"We congratulate Google and the American people in making this very important change in the Middle East. The Al Aqsa Mosque (located on the Temple Mount) is part of Jerusalem, and Jerusalem is part of Palestine. If such a big institution like Google corrected these historical mistakes on maps, maybe we can bring about a change in the depictions of Palestine by the American media, which is controlled by the Zionists."

According to Abu Nasser, whose terror group says it is trying to liberate the Al Aqsa Mosque, the Jewish Temple "never existed."

"At least not on the area Jews now call the Temple Mount.," he said. "Maybe a Temple existed somewhere, but not in Jerusalem. The Temple Mount exists only in the imaginations of the Jews and Americans."

Abu Nasser's Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades is the declared "military wing" of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party. The Brigades, together with the Islamic Jihad terror group, has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis.

The revelation's about Google Earth's Mideast map follow media reports this week insurgents in Iraq are using Google's satellite imagery to attack British bases and troops.

Intelligence sources quoted by Britain's Daily Telegraph said raids of insurgents last week found printouts of Google satellite photographs of British bases, including details such as toiled blocks, Land Rover parking, and tented areas.

One of the photographs, taken of a hotel housing a British regiment, had the camp's longitude and latitude written on the back, the newspaper said.

"This is evidence, as far as we are concerned, for planning terrorist attacks," an intelligence officer told The Daily Telegraph. "Who would otherwise have Google Earth imagery of one of our bases?"

A Google spokesman told the newspaper its information could be used for "good and bad." "Of course we are always ready to listen to governments' requests," he said.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

PROTEST IS FINE, BALANCED PROTEST IS BETTER
Posted by Denis MacEoin, January 15, 2007.

This article was published January 12, 2007 on the A Liberal Defence of Israel website (http://mid-eastplus.blogspot.com/), a blog "designed to correct the false impression that Israel is an illiberal, fascist, or apartheid state. Here, I shall present arguments to show that Israel actually embodies the best in democracy, anti-racism, religious freedom, and rights for women, gay people, and minorities of different kinds."

It's easy to form the impression that anyone who defends Israel comes from a right-wing, even a far-right, political viewpoint. Because a majority (or what seems like a majority, but may well be only a vocal minority) of people on the Left, most of the liberal and left-leaning press, most liberal and leftish intellectuals, journalists, TV producers, and political activists have become anti-Israel in their sentiments and actions, it is too easy to assume that defence of Israel is automatically a right-wing matter, and a matter for shame at that. But it really isn't that simple. There are Labour MPs who belong to Labour Friends of Israel, there are pro-Israel, Left-oriented pressure groups like Engage, and there are plenty of vocal Israel advocates from the centre of politics, like myself.

There are, naturally, many people who defend Israel who do take conservative and neo-conservative positions on related issues. Some of them are very hawkish indeed, and they frighten me as much as they do you. But they are not representative. For one thing, there are many liberal-minded people on the right whose concern for social justice is equal to that of those on the left and centre. For another, there are probably more on the extreme right who consider Israel and Jews with contempt or outright hatred. It's also important to remember that, until not that long ago, Israeli politics and Israeli government were dominated by the Left. Israel's history is more socialist than that of the UK. Israelis protest about many of the same things other liberal-minded people protest about. Israeli liberals anguish about much the same things as liberals everywhere: poverty, war, injustice, freedom of speech, torture, abuse of human rights, the environment, racism, the impact of giant corporations, prisoners of conscience, and other, often related, issues.

This is not to suggest that people on the right, in Israel as elsewhere, do not anguish about these matters or take action to improve them. But the centre and left are more likely to be seen on the streets marching, carrying placards, or shouting slogans, writing letters to the press, creating pressure groups. And such activities, it must be said, are vital to the health of any democratic society. We all have to care about the oppressed, the disappeared, the imposition of capital punishment, the waging of war, the massacre of innocents. If liberals and the Left take up their cudgels on behalf of such causes more visibly than those on the Right, then we must all be grateful for that. If left-wing feminists have advanced the cause of women's rights in the teeth of opposition from conservatives and traditionalists, they deserve the thanks of women (and men) everywhere. If liberals have put apartheid or sex trafficking or the exploitation of workers and farmers in the Third World on the agenda, and have challenged the Dutch Reformed Church or women traffickers or big business to do so, they can be credited for many legal and political reforms that enhance the rights of us all. Their predecessors, who brought about the abolition of slavery, the end of child labour, the curtailment of capital punishment, or the introduction of legislation granting homosexuals the same rights as other citizens no longer seem the enemies of propriety, morality, and social cohesion they did all those years ago.

But over the past couple of decades, liberal and left-wing politics have undergone an unprecedented, even bizarre, change of direction, a sea change that has distorted and disfigured much of its original world-view. Much of the natural sentiment of liberal politiics remains: a bias towards the underdog, a determination for justice, a belief in humanity and the rights human beings deserve as a natural heritage. But this has often been obscured -- and, as time passes, is ever more obscured -- beneath other messages. Political correctness, from valid beginnings, has transmogrified into something so far removed from its original purposes as to be unrecognizable. This is nothing new in politics or religion, of course: human minds and institutions seem to have an instinctive drive towards extremes. Thus Marxism, starting as an ideology based in justice and the equitable distribution of wealth and resources, helped create some of the least just societies in history, some forms of Christianity, though rooted in the teachings of a man of peace who loved the poor and the dispossessed, became illiberal and violent expressions of militancy and aristocratic contempt for the poor, the French Revolution, situated in the Rights of Man, devoured its children and brought forth a megalomaniac emperor. We can all add examples from history and current affairs, from both the left and right of politics.

Political correctness and related political attitudes have turned several otherwise honourable endeavours into extremist onslaughts on moderate and balanced democratic discourse. For example, feminism achieved great things then turned sour in part with radical feminists made men culpable for all the ills of human kind, declared that 'all sex is rape', and became as intolerant of the male sex as men had ever been of women. Similarly, where Martin Luther King took black people on a great march to freedom and equality, black power ideologues became racists in reverse. Listening to the boxer Muhammad Ali pour out venom on the white race was to me as sickening as giving ear to a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan spew forth hate speech against blacks.

The current vogue for post-colonial studies, introduced in part by the Egyptian 'Palestinian' intellectual Edward Said, consists for the most part of criticism of the colonial enterprises of the great Western empires -- the British, French, Spanish, and Portuguese conquest of most of the world, or the later US neo-colonialism by proxy. Much of that criticism is entirely valid, if we bear in mind the multitude of wrongs done to native peoples and their cultures. But less is said about the benefits imperialism sometimes brought, nor do we hear much about non-Western imperialism, its vices, and its benefits. The many Islamic empires -- the Umayyads, the Abbasids, the Mughals, the Safavids, the Ottomans -- seem to be blameless, the Arab conquests, with their devastating impact on the Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia are passed over in silence. The imperial history of Africa, the exploits of the great jihad states of Nigeria and elsewhere, the Chinese empire, the depredations of the Mongols and Timur Lang, the empires of the Byzantines and Sasanids, the military exploits of the Tartars, the Cossacks, the Turks, and the rest are seldom referred to.

In political terms, this approach translates into an all-consuming hatred for our own culture, for Western civilization in general, and for specific parts of the Western world, notably the United States, Israel, and the United Kingdom. That other civilizations have oppressed subject people, committed atrocities, established totalitarian ideologies, carried out vast and long-lived trading in slaves (notably the Arabs and Ottoman Turks) seems to escape liberal reproach. Meanwhile, the great achievements of the West are swept under the carpet: the abolition of slavery, the United States Constitution, the Declaration of Human Rights, the spread of advanced education, science, medicine, tolerance for different creeds, democracy, and the very creation of left-wing and liberal political thought.

What has turned an entire generation of young people, committed to great ideals, desiring the well-being of their fellow men and women, well educated, enquiring, the recipients of the greatest material comforts bestowed on any generartion in history, with hearts burning for good and peace, dedicated to make poverty history and discrimination a thing of the past into what seems at times a gang of thugs whose hatred for Israel -- and sometimes Jews in general -- a driving force in their lives? Is it not that same sense of imbalance, that absence of measure that has been imposed on them by the strident demands of political correctness, that numbing sense of righteousness and rightness that has come to pervade the liberal world, that political absolutism that resembles so greatly the unswerving will of the Third Reich, that black-and-white Manichaeism of the Stalinist empire, or that fixed division of the world between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam that characterizes all Islamic political thought?

The demonization of Israel has reached proportions that none of us have seen since the days Hitler and his propagandists made Jews the scapegoats of all the ills of mankind. It is everywhere accompanied by a dogged refusal to see harm in the thoughts and deeds of the PLO, Hamas, Hizbullah, or any other of the terrorist armies whose knives seek Jewish throats, to acknowledge the feverish anti-Semitism of the Palestinians, the Egyptians, the Iranians, and others throughout the world, to contemplate, however briefly, the possibility that Israelis are like other human beings, and that they may have sound reason to defend themselves from a second genocidal attack on their race. Not seeing things like that, that's what hard to understand. How can a liberal not see it? How can members of the International Solidarity Movement pose with Kalshnikovs and still insist they work for peace? How can Muslim liberals read anti-Semitic texts and see anti-Semitic images every day in their press and on television, and turn aside from it, and say and do nothing to call their societies -- the very societies they purposrt to condemn for their absolutism and intolerance in every other field -- to account? How come the left-wing president of Nicargua, Daniel Ortega is even now embracing Mahmoud Ahmadinezhad, the president of a deeply conservative theocratic state, and claiming they have much in common?

How is it possible for a man like Jimmy Carter to abandon his own principles so thoroughly as to seek in the Middle East, not a righting of wrongs, but a down-and-dirty fight with Israel and a whitewashing of Palestinian obstinacy and violence? He knows better than that, I'm convinced; but in a world where value is seen only in the underdog, however ignobly he may have barked or bitten, where strength against intolerance is seen as the iron fist of an apartheid state, and where terrorism becomes the moral equivalent of heroism and a struggle for freedom from 'colonial' oppression, perhaps he felt he had no other choice, if he was not to lose all credibility with the credulous centre of American politics.

Why does no-one march against al-Qa'ida? Against female genital mutilation? Against forced marriages? Against honour killings? Where are the protests about the Burmese dictatorship, the Chinese occupation of Tibet, the Turkish denial of the Armenian massacres, the continuing Arab slave trade, Mugabe's robber regime in Zimbabwe, Pakistan's nuclear bomb, North Korea's state-created famines, and all the other glaring injustices that drag on just above or, more often, just below the headlines? Could it be that none of these involve Western states? Could it be that liberals have come to believe that any sort of injustice or violence may be excused so long as it is the work of non-Westerners, whom we must never condemn? Is that not a form of reverse racism?

When I see ISM members stand in Palestinian streets to place their bodies as shields between Palestinian suicide bombers and Israeli children; when there are banners outside Parliament calling on Hizbullah to disarm in accordance with UN resolutions; when I hear the sound of tramping feet and shouting voices calling for an end to terrorism; when I open my morning Guardian and read a letter signed by hundreds, calling for a boycott of Iran -- then, and only then, will I start to believe that the liberal left and the liberal centre have regained their sense of proportion. Until then, I despair, not that there may be peace and justice and kindness in the world, but that political correctness will have blinded so many to where they may find them.

Denis MacEoin's area of expertise is in Arabic and Islamic Studies and he has published extensively on Islam, including "The Sources for Babi History and Doctrine, & Rituals in Babism and Baha'ism," and "Islam in the Modern World."

To Go To Top

FUTURE JIHAD: TERRORIST STRATEGIES AGAINST THE WEST & OTHER DEMOCRACIES
Posted by Walid Phares, January 15, 2007.

During the year Future Jihad was published in America, significant developments further proved true the conclusions of the initial book. In one single year, before and after its publication a series of declarations by the Jihadists, by international leaders and by intellectuals on all sides of the conflict, signaled that the "War on Terrorism" was after all an all-out confrontation between a worldwide Web of Islamist movements and regimes on the one hand and a dispersed international community, some of which was engaged, while parts of it weren't in this world war, on the other hand.

My first objective was to explain basic facts to the international public community: That there was an ideological current out there, aiming at world domination, which he defined as "Jihadism." The latter comes from two trees, one is Salafi the other is Khomeinist. The Salafists, formed in Sunni environment, are inspired by middle ages doctrinaires and have emerged in modern times as Wahabis, Muslim Brotherhoods, Takfiris, Deobandis, Tablighi and others. They want the reestablishment of a modern day Caliphate. They feel they are the heirs of 14 centuries of history and reject modern international law. The Khomeinists are the Jihadists who emerged in the Shiia community. They aim at establishing an Imamate to reunify all Muslims under their guidance in pursuit of Jihad.

The books' second objective was to show how Jihadists view the world, its modern history, its international relations, its wars, the various civilizations and how they adapt their strategies to modernity. Chapters three, seven, eight and nine were dedicated to show the readers how the Jihadists viewed the 20th century, WWII, the cold war, the choices they made and the different options they developed as Salafists, Wahabis, Khumeinists, regarding the Soviets, Israel, the West, and the Muslim regions. The bottom line was to show that there were no sheer emotional and simplistic reactions to crisis, but rather focused, integrated, and complex policies and strategic objectives. This assertion goes against the dominant theories of the past, which never went away yet, that in essence Islamist attitudes are created by Western policies. Future Jihad precisely argues otherwise: Jihadi ideologies are sui generis. They were developed before current international relations were formalized in laws, survived the latter and have projected their aims regardless of Western or non-Western policies. Certainly, diplomatic, economic and military acts by greater and small powers impact the evolution, decisions and plans of the Islamists. Policies affect other policies, but Jihadism and its various trees and branches, is a being of its own. It relates to the evolution of political Islam historically and can only be explained from inside out.

"...it has also become clear that whoever would be able to shape the minds of Americans as to identify the enemy will win the War on Terror. And whoever can show the US public or bar it from seeing the reality of the Jihadi wars against democracies will make or break the War on Terror and its length."

The third objective of the book was to describe the Jihadi war against the Soviet Union during the Cold War and against the United States and some of its allies after the cold war, leading to 9/11 and beyond.

The final objective in producing Future Jihad was an attempt to analyze the specific conflict between al Qaida and the United States. In chapter twelve I examined the root causes of America's failure showing that the breaches were not simple security flaws but rather systemic malfunctioning at the national security level. In Chapter thirteen, I suggested a model of what could have been a historically successful Jihadist offensive worldwide and its consequences in the US had a 9/11 of a greater dimension occurred years later instead.

The fifth objective was to offer modest guidelines and prescriptions to face off with the growing dangers of Salafi and Khomeinist ideologically-based terrorism. While geopolitical threats to regional and world peace come from classical radical regimes, such as Tehran's and to a certain extent Damascus' and Khartoum's, another type of threats is represented by the capacity of Jihadi networks to transform moderate or stable Muslim Governments into radical ones, with a full use of their resources

Finally I made another set of recommendations to educate the public, the Government's agencies and the media as to the mind, visions, strategies and if possible the tactics of the Jihadists. The prescription aimed at developing a "global resistance" against Jihad-Terrorism, both within the Arab Muslim world and within the international community. I am glad to announce that the paperback Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies against the West is out in English and Spanish. Versions in other languages are expected in the near future.

The Jihadi Counter Offensive

During 2005-2006, I had several important opportunities to address and interact with policy, legislative, media, community decision makers, experts and concerned citizens across the US and Europe, including in Paris, London, Brussels, Vienna, and Lisbon. In America, my book tour allowed me to discuss Future Jihad in Washington, New York, New Jersey, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami and on many campuses nationwide. Since its launching I have received many emails and messages from bright readers of the book as well as viewers of and listeners to talk shows. These inputs were sociologically critical for the assessment of the public understanding of the bigger picture. I was also able to conduct briefings at the European Parliament, the US Congress, the United Nations Security Council, Interpol and other international bodies. In addition, my participation in Arab media forums including on al Jazeera, al Hurra, al Arabiya and other outlets provided me the opportunity to interact with ideologues, academics and activists from all sides, and particularly of relevance the self declared Jihadi camp. In addition, my interactions with democracy groups and intellectuals from the Arab and Muslim world on the one hand, and frequent visits to and learning process from the various Islamists -particularly Jihadists- chat rooms online, helped my analysis of Future Jihad refines itself and develop ballistics of knowledge in the clashing strategies of the so-called War on Terrorism. My main post-book conclusion is as follow: The Jihadists are -Salafists and Khumeinists alike- on a worldwide counter offensive with their perceived enemies and they are planning on widening it, rationalize it, and render it irreversible. Here are the various sketches from present situations into future trends:

In the paperback version of 2006 I discussed the specific issue of Bin Laden and al Qaeda and their importance in the global Jihadi movement; their centrality but also their relativity as well. One concept I noted particularly the so-called Hudna (truce) proposed several times by the group, particularly to Europe. The Hudna is a main indicative of Jihadi geopolitics, often misunderstood in the West. Another concept I revisited is the worldwide web of Jihadism, stressing its ideological but also its political nature. While loose and full of fragments, I believe it has a centrality that escapes the classical perception of Western defense parameters.

Europe's Jihads

Following my several field trips to Europe and monitoring of Jihadi deployments on the continent I analyzed the global strategies of the Salafists in specific zones: the United Kingdom; Western European battlefields: Belgium, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Germany in addition to the southern European zone including Spain and Italy; finally France (which I consider as one zone by itself). Two other European zones are Eastern Europe and the Balkans with different outlooks and geopolitical Jihadi realities. The European Jihads are ahead of their cross Atlantic parallels. The ideological mobilization that surfaced during the so called "Cartoons Jihad" is an important indicator of the wide spread of Wahabi and Salafi teachings across the continent

The World Battlefields

Russia's battlefields with the Salafists have reached a national security level of threat, both from Chechnya and through its southern borders with Central Asia. The Asian battlefields have grown geometrically in intensity and scope: Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia to the East; Bengla Desh, India, Pakistan and Afghanistan to the West; and Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in the center. Asian Jihad is gradually including a Chinese Jihad in the old Muslim Sin Kiang and spills over to Australia south bound and to the Greater Middle East West bound. Aussie is facing two threats: One regional to its north, linked to the success and advance of Salafi forces in Indonesia and the Philippines, and the other through domestic infiltration by radical Islamists, similar to the global patterns of penetration in the West. In Africa, the Jihadi battlefields are spreading rapidly from Somalia to Darfur all the way to the sub-Saharan countries of Chad, Mauritania, Ivory Coast and Nigeria.

The Greater Middle East

But it is in the Greater Middle East, from Morocco to Iran, where the central battlefields will be decisive. Iraq's Sunni triangle -- contrary to the mediatized wisdom in the West- is only the tip of the Jihadi iceberg. Al Qaeda in Iraq has "chosen" the battlefield to pin down US central forces while Salafist and Khomeinist forces are on the offensive in other spots. Had America not chosen Iraq as a ground for confrontation, the Jihadists would have chosen another terrain for the clash. It is ironic that mainstream scholarship in the West is blind to this reality. In the Arabian Peninsula, al Qaeda and its wider web of Wahabis patiently await their moment for the ultimate leap. In North Africa, the combat Salafists are omnipresent, and from there on, dispatch their cells into Europe. In Egypt and among Palestinians, the Brotherhoods and Hamas have created strongholds; and in Turkey the soft Islamists are taking all the time needed to deliver their battle of ideas against the seculars. In addition to the Salafi surge, the Iranian-led axis of Jihadism from Tehran to southern Lebanon, with the Syrian regime in the center wages its own campaign. Ahmedinijad's regional offensive -- with nuclear ambitions and Terrorism tools- is only the most recent expression of the older Khamanei's regime. The "axis" has mounted a separate state-sponsored Jihad: Hamas and PIJ in Palestine, HizbAllah in Lebanon, Muqtada al Sadr in Iraq and cells around the Middle East and within the West. The question of Terrorism in the Greater Middle East isn't confined to the Arab-Israeli conflict anymore. The latter has become a consequence of the region's Jihadism, not the other way around.

Latin American Ambitions of the Jihadists

From Venezuela under Chavez's populist power and from Bolivia's new "Castrist" leadership the Jihadist bases are growing to meet the tri-border emerging "Emirate" of the tips of Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay. Al Qaeda and HizbAllah are racing to outnumber the cells of each other organizations. From the south of the Americas, the Jihadi thrust will be reaching the US mainly through the Mexican border and deep into the heart of the country.

Canada's Jihadists

With the arrest of cells during the summer of 2006 in Toronto, Canada has entered the Global sphere of Jihadi penetration. Modeled after their American counterparts, the Canadian Jihadists are as determined and prepared to strike and enflame the country. In fact North America seems to have become a one continental hub of operations. Cells form on both sides of the border and interact with each other. For example the arrest of the Georgia cell last year showed a Montreal connection. The same type of radical literature is found in American and Canadian cities, and interestingly enough the Islamist radical activism operates on a "North American" level.

America's Jihad Mutates

As I argued in the first edition of Future Jihad (Terrorist Strategies against America), the Mohammed Atta type of Terrorists is not in the majority anymore. Today, 2006-2007, the new Jihadists are mostly US-born, speak the language well, are educated and operates within the system. And more importantly, they benefit from a militant political shield, which protect them as they grow ideologically and organizationally. In the past few months more evidence is emerging on the deep influence the pro-Jihadist groups have developed inside the country. The wall protecting the spread of the Wahabi-Salafi, and even Khomeinist ideologies in America has become close to be legal, after it has thickened politically. The mutation of Jihadism inside the US is the single most important challenge the country will face in this decade and maybe beyond. The incapacitation of the US Government in its counter Jihadist efforts has become the central breach in national security.

The War of Ideas: The Future of the War on Terror

Hence, it has also become clear that whoever would be able to shape the minds of Americans as to identify the enemy will win the War on Terror. And whoever can show the US public or bar it from seeing the reality of the Jihadi wars against democracies will make or break the War on Terror and its length.

Dr. Walid Phares is Senior Fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and author of Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America (Palgrave/St. Martin, 2005). He is also a Professor of Middle East Studies at Florida Atlantic University.

The international version of Professor Walid Phares' Future Jihad is now released. The new title is "Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies against the West" Published by Palgrave/St Martin; New York and London (December 2006).

This article appeared in The New Media Journal.us January 13, 2007
http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/w_phares/01132007.htm

To Go To Top

THE SECOND HOLOCAUST WILL NOT BE LIKE THE FIRST
Posted by David Haimson, January 15, 2007.

This op-ed piece was published in the German daily DIE WELT (in German) on January 6, 2007
http://www.welt.de/data/2007/01/06/1165992.html

"Benny Morris believes that the Iranian regime will annihilate Israel with nuclear weapons, and nobody will stop it from doing so. Morris used to have the reputation of being an Anti-Zionist, but he rejects the accusation that he questions Israel's right of existence. In this article, Morris explains why he is convinced that sometime in the future millions of Israelis will be murdered." (DIE WELT, translated by Ursula Duba) The following is the original text in English provided by Benny Morris.

The Nazis, of course, industrialized mass murder. But still, the perpetrators had one-on-one contact with the victims. They may have dehumanized them, over months and years of appalling debasement and in their minds, before the actual killing. But, still, they were in eye- and ear-contact, sometimes in tactile contact, with their victims. The Germans, along with their non-German helpers, had to round up the men, women and children from their houses and drag and beat them through the streets and mow them down in nearby woods or push and pack them on cattle cars and transport them to the camps, where 'Work makes Free', separate the able-bodied from the completely useless and lure them into 'shower' halls and pour in the gas and then take out, or oversee the extraction of, the bodies and prepare the 'showers' for the next batch.

The second Holocaust will be quite different. One bright morning, in five or ten years' time, perhaps during a regional crisis, perhaps out of the blue, a day or a year or five years after Iran's acquisition of the Bomb, the mullahs in Qom will covoke in secret session, under a portrait of the steely-eyed Ayatollah Khomeini, and give President Ahmedinejad, by then in his second or third term, the go ahead. The orders will go out and the Shihab III and IV missiles will take off for Tel Aviv, Beersheba, Haifa, and Jerusalem, and probably some military sites, including Israel's half dozen air and (reported) nuclear missile bases. Some of the Shihabs will be nuclear-tipped, perhaps even with multiple warheads. Others will be dupes, packed merely with biological or chemical agents, or old newspapers, to draw off or confuse Israel's anti-missile batteries and Home Guard units.

With a country the size and shape of Israel (an elongated 8,000 square miles), probably four or five hits will suffice: No more Israel. A million or more Israelis, in the greater Tel Aviv, Haifa and Jerusalem areas, will die immediately. Millions will be seriously irradiated. Israel has about seven million inhabitants. No Iranian will see or touch an Israeli. It will be quite impersonal.

Some of the dead will inevitably be Arab. 1.3 million of Israel's citizens are Arab and another 3.5 million additional Arabs live in the semi-occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. Jerusalem, Tel Aviv-Jaffa and Haifa have substantial Arab minorities. And there are large Arab concentrations immediately around Jerusalem (in Ramallah-El Bireh, Bir Zeit, Bethlehem), and outside Haifa. Here, too, many will die, immediately or by and by.

It is doubtful whether such a mass killing of fellow Muslims will trouble Ahmedinejad and the mullahs. The Iranians don't especially like Arabs, especially Sunni Arabs, with whom they have intermittently warred for centuries. And they have an especial contempt for the (Sunni) Palestinians, who, after all, though initially outnumbering the Jews by more than 10 to 1, failed during the long conflict to prevent the Jews from establishing their state or taking over all of Palestine. Besides, the Iranian leadership sees the destruction of Israel as a supreme divine command, as a herald of the Second Coming, and the Muslims dispatched collaterally as so many shuhada (martyrs) in the noble cause. Anyway, the Palestinians, many of them dispersed around the globe, will survive as a people, as will the greater Arab Nation, of which they are part. And surely, to be rid of the Jewish state, the Arabs should be willing to make some sacrifices. In the cosmic balance sheet, it will be worth the candle.

A question may nevertheless arise in the Iranian councils: What about Jerusalem? After all, the city contains Islam's third holiest shrines (after Mecca and Medina), Al Aksa Mosque and the Mosque of Omar. But Ali Khamenei, the supreme spiritual leader, and Ahmedinejad most likely would reply much as they would to the wider question regarding the destruction and radioactive pollution of Palestine as a whole: The city, like the land, by God's grace, in twenty or fifty years' time, will recover. And it will be restored to Islam (and the Arabs). And the deeper pollution will have been eradicated. To judge from Ahmedinejad's continuous reference to Palestine and the need to destroy Israel, and his denial of the first Holocaust, he is a man obsessed. He shares this with the mullahs: All were brought up on the teachings of Khomeini, a prolific anti-Semite who often fulminated against 'the Little Satan'. To judge from Ahmedinejad's organisation of the Holocaust cartoons competition and the (current) Holocaust denial conference, the Iranian president's hatreds are deep (and, of course, shameless). He is willing to gamble -- the future of Iran or even of the whole Muslim Middle East in exchange for Israel's destruction. No doubt he believes that Allah, somehow, will protect Iran from an Israeli nuclear response or an American counterstrike. Allah aside, he may well believe that his missiles will so pulverize the Jewish state, knock out its leadership and its land-based nuclear bases, and demoralize or confuse its nuclear-armed submarine commanders that it will be unable to respond. And, with his deep contempt for the weak-kneed West, he is unlikely to take seriously the threat of American nuclear retaliation.

Or he may well take into account a counter-strike and simply, irrationally (to our way of thinking), be willing to pay the price. As his mentor, Khomeini, put it in a speech in Qom in 1980: 'We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah ... I say, let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant...' For these worshipers at the cult of death, even the sacrifice of the homeland is acceptable if the outcome is the demise of Israel.

Israel's deputy defense minister, Ephraim Sneh, has suggested that Iran doesn't even have to use the Bomb to destroy Israel. Simply, the nuclearization of Iran will so overawe and depress Israelis that they will lose hope and gradually flee emigrate, and potential foreign investors and immigrants will shy away from the mortally threatened Jewish State. These, together, will bring about the State's demise. But my feeling is that Ahmedinejad and his allies lack the patience for such a drawn-out denouement; they seek Israel's annihilation in the here and now, in the immediate future, in their lifetime. They won't want to leave anything up to the vagaries of history.

As with the first, the second Holocaust will have been preceded by decades of preparation of hearts and minds, by Iranian and Arab leaders, Western intellectuals and media outlets. Different messages have gone out to different audiences -- but all have (objectively) served the same goal, the demonization of Israel. Muslims the world over have been taught: 'The Zionists\the Jews are the embodiment of evil' and 'Israel must be destroyed.' And Westeners, more subtly, were instructed: 'Israel is a racist oppressor state' and 'Israel, in this age of multi-culturalism, is an anachronism and superfluous'. Generations of Muslims and at least a generation of Westerners have been brought up on these catechisms.

The build-up to the second Holocaust (which, incidentally, in the end, will probably claim roughly the same number of lives as did the first) has seen an international community fragmented and driven by separate, selfish appetites - Russia and China obsessed with Muslim markets; France, with Arab oil -- and the United States driven by the debacle in Iraq into a deep isolationism. Iran has been left free to pursue its nuclear destiny and Israel and Iran, to face off alone.

But an ultimately isolated Israel will prove unequal to the task, like a rabbit caught in the headlights of an onrushing car. Last summer, led by a party hack of a prime minister and a small-time trade unionist as defense minister, and deploying an army trained for quelling incompetent and poorly-armed Palestinians gangs in the occupied territories and overly concerned about both sustaining and inflicting casualties, Israel failed in a 34-day mini-war against a small Iran-backed guerrilla army of Lebanese fundamentalists (albeit highly motivated, well-trained and well-armed). That mini-war thoroughly demoralized the Israeli political and military leaderships.

Since then, the ministers and generals, like their counterparts in the West, have looked on glumly as Hizbullah's patrons have been arming with doomsday weapons. Perversely, the Israeli leaders may even have been happy with Western pressures urging restraint. Most likely they deeply wished to believe Western assurances that somebody, somehow -- the UN, G-7 -- would pull the radioactive chestnuts out of the fire. There are even those who fell for the outlandish idea that a regime-change in Teheran, driven by a reputedly secular middle class, would ultimately stymie the mad mullahs.

But even more to the point, the Iranian program presented an infinitely complex challenge for a country with Israel's limited conventional military resources. Taking their cue from the successful Israel Air Force's destruction in 1981 of Iraq's Osiraq nuclear reactor, the Iranians duplicated and dispersed their facilities and buried them deep underground (and the Iranian targets are about twice as far from Israel as was Baghdad). Taking out with conventional weapons the known Iranian facilities would take an American-size air force working round-the-clock for more than a month. At best, Israel's air force, commandos and navy could hope to hit only some of the components of the Iranian project. But, in the end, it would remain substantially intact -- and the Iranians even more determined (if that were possible) to reach the Bomb as soon as possible. (It would also, without doubt, immediately result in a world-embracing Islamist terrorist campaign against Israel (and possibly its Western allies) and, of course, near-universal vilification. Orchestrated by Ahmedinejad, all would clamor that the Iranian program had been geared to peaceful purposes.). At best, an Israeli conventional strike could delay the Iranians by a year or two.

In short order, therefore, the incompetent leadership in Jerusalem would soon confront a doomsday scenario, either after launching their marginally effective conventional offensive or in its stead, of launching a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the Iranian nuclear program, some of whose components were in or near major cities. Would they have the stomach for this? Would their determination to save Israel extend to pre-emptively killing millions of Iranians and, in effect, destroying Iran?

This dilemma had long ago been accurately defined by a wise general: Israel's nuclear armory was unusable. It could only be used 'too early or 'too late.' There would never be a "right" time. Use it 'too early,' meaning before Iran acquired similar weapons, and Israel would be cast in the role of international pariah, a target of universal Muslim assault, without a friend in the world; 'too late' would mean using its nuclear weapons after the Iranians had struck. What purpose would that serve?

So Israel's leaders will grit their teeth and hope that somehow things will turn out for the best. Perhaps, after acquiring the Bomb, the Iranians will behave 'rationally'?

But the Iranians are driven by a higher logic. And they will launch their rockets. And, as with the first Holocaust, the international community will do nothing. It will all be over, for Israel, in a few minutes -- not like in the 1940s, when the world had five long years in which to wring its hands and do nothing. After the Shihabs fall, the world will send rescue ships and medical aid for the lightly charred. It will not nuke Iran. For what purpose and at what cost? An American nuclear response would lastingly alienate the whole of the Muslim world, deepening and universalizing the ongoing clash of civilizations. And, of course, it would not bring Israel back. (Would hanging a serial muderer bring back his victims?) So what would be the point?

Still, the second Holocaust will be different in the sense that Ahmedinejad will not actually see and touch those he so wishes dead (and, one may speculate, this might cause him disappointment as, in his years of service in Iranian death squads in Europe, he may have acquired a taste for actual blood). And, indeed, there will be no scenes like the following, quoted in Daniel Mendelsohn's recent 'The Lost, A Search for Six of Six Million,' in which is described the second Nazi Aktion in Bolechow, Poland, in September 1942:

'A terrible episode happened with Mrs. Grynberg. The Ukrainians and Germans, who had broken into her house, found her giving birth. The weeping and entreaties of bystanders didn't help and she was taken from her home in a nightshirt and dragged into the square in front of the town hall. There ... she was dragged onto a dumpster in the yard of the town hall with a crowd of Ukraininans present, who cracked jokes and jeered and watched the pain of childbirth and she gave birth to a child. The child was immediately torn from her arms along with its umbilical cord and thrown -- It was trampled by the crowd and she was stood on her feet as blood poured out of her with bleeding bits hanging and she stood that way for a few hours by the wall of the town hall, afterwards she went with all the others to the train station where they loaded her into a carriage in a train to Belzec [extermination camp].'

In the next Holocaust there will be no such heart-rending scenes, of perpetrators and victims mired in blood (though, to judge from pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the physical effects of nuclear explosions can be fairly unpleasant).

But it will be a Holocaust nonetheless. Contact David Haimson at DvHaimson@aol.com to receive emails with direct links to articles on Israel that are well-worth reading.

To Go To Top

FROM ISRAEL -- MORE ACTIVISM REQUIRED, PLEASE!
Posted by Arlene Kushner, January 15, 2007.

I begin with a speech that PA President Mahmoud Abbas gave last Thursday, on the cusp of the arrival of Sec. Rice to this area. He spoke at a rally in Ramallah; the occasion was the 42nd anniversary of Fatah's first attack on Israel. The content of the speech is dynamite.

"Our rifles, all our rifles are aimed at the Occupation," he declared.

With this, he has once again openly stated that he has no intention of taking on Hamas, but will fight Israel.

Indeed, he went on to say, "No one [here] is a criminal. All our people are as one hand to free our land...No one [Palestinian] is outside our society." This has consistently been his position: he began his presidency speaking of "unity."

After Abbas's speech, the senior announcer for PA TV (which is Fatah controlled), clarified, describing Israel's establishment as the beginning of "occupation." Nothing could be clearer than this: They don't consider Israel within the Green Line legitimate either. They want it all, they want us gone, they are not looking for a two-state solution.

Abbas voiced support for the "right of return." And once again he invited Hamas and Islamic Jihad to join the PLO, which he heads.

He also rejected the notion of a Palestinian state with temporary borders (Take that, Livni and Rice!) "Today more than any other day, we must hold fast to our Palestinian principles...We will not give up one grain [of land] in Jerusalem."

IMRA has run translation and commentary by PA media expert Dr. Michael Widlanski: http://imra.org.il/story.php3?id=32420. I would suggest that you save this, or bookmark it for future reference. This absolutely puts the lie to any notion of Abbas as a moderate.

~~~~~~~~~~

Condoleezza Rice arrived in our part of the world on Saturday. In the course of her various pronouncements, she has in no way alluded to Abbas's speech (which I quite assure you the State Department monitored). In fact, in her press conference with Abbas, held yesterday in Ramallah after she met with him -- http://imra.org.il/story.php3?id=32446 -- she persisted in advancing her alternative-universe thinking. She's still making that effort to bolster Abbas, so that he will become strong enough to promote his "moderate" agenda. Consider:

"I want everyone to know, particularly the Palestinian people, how much we admire the leadership of President Abbas as a leader of the Palestinian people." This is so blatant in its intent that it's ridiculous.

"The Palestinian people have waited a long time for their own state." They could have had a state of their own for years already, if they had wanted it more than they want to destroy Israel.

"And if there is anything that I can do and that the President can do to finally realize that day when the Palestinian people -- who everybody understands to be an entrepreneurial people, a people who are predisposed toward democracy and tolerance -- for the Palestinians to have their own state that they can live in security and peace with Israel and that Israel can therefore have a secure and a democratic neighbor, why wouldn't we want to do that?"

A people that everyone understands to be predisposed toward democracy and tolerance??? We're looking at people who are essentially lacking a civil society -- at people who kill and kidnap each other when they are angry. How can she stand before the press and say this with a straight face? Does she believe that in saying it she makes it so? Does she remotely imagine that Israel could live in security and peace with a Palestinian state at its border? Does her merely saying this make the "moderate" Arabs happy?

While Rice made no mention in this press conference of requiring compliance of the PA with regard to dismantling terrorism, etc., she did allude to the fact that the US is seriously considering an $85 million grant to the PA security forces, for training and equipment, so that there would be "professional, unified Palestinian security forces."

She doesn't say what these professional, unified security forces are going to do, or who will be included (Abbas would include the terrorists). She does not talk about terrorism.

On Thursday, Abbas, president of the PA, made it clear he was not going to take on Hamas or challenge any of the terrorist groups. "No one Palestinian is outside our society."

On Thursday, Abbas made it clear that he intended to attack Israel: "Our rifles, all our rifles are aimed at the Occupation."

On Sunday, Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State, called the Palestinian people a people "predisposed to tolerance."

On Sunday, Condoleezza Rice, talked about a massive donation of funds for the PA being considered by the US, some of which would provide arms to the PA security forces.

This is too outrageous to accept without an outcry of protest.

Condoleezza Rice must be called on this.

This time I ask that you contact two very influential Congressmen:

The Honorable Tom Lantos (D-CA)
Chairman, Committee on International Relations
US House of Representatives
2413 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3531
Fax (202) 226-4183

The Honorable Gary Ackerman (D-NY)
Chairman, Subcommittee on the Middle East
House Committee on International Relations
US House of Representatives
2243 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2601
Fax: (202) 225-1589

Congresspersons prefer not to be contacted by e-mail. I know it's more trouble, but please take the time to call or fax or write a snail mail letter. Your effort will pay off.

If this is not possible for you, you might try to reach Congressman Lantos at: CA12Lantos@mail.house.gov or via his Chief of Staff, robert.king@mail.house.gov

You might try to reach Congressman Ackerman at: gary_ackerman@mail.house.gov. (There is an underscore between his names.) or via his Chief of Staff, jedd.moskowitz@mail.house.gov

You will not be addressing Congressmen Lantos and Ackerman as your elected representatives (unless you are the constituent of one of these gentlemen). You will be addressing them in their capacities as chairs of relevant committees -- chairs who will respond to the concerns of the nation. You certainly must write as an American.

The message is simple, and can be drawn from the above information: PA president Abbas said clearly in a speech on January 11 that Palestinian guns will be aimed at Israel, and that he will not be taking on Hamas. Yet three days later Sec. Rice, after meeting with him, spoke about helping the formation of a PA state and providing money for their security forces. Quote from their words, above. Say that this is not acceptable. It is a policy based on air and presents a danger to Israel and to the long term goals of the US.

Then, please, once again, forward this to everyone you know, get this on to lists and blogs. And, as you are able, write letters to the editors of your local papers addressing these same issues.

It's time to expose the hypocritical, anti-Israel policy of the US State Department.

A Sample Letter (supplied by Nurit Greenger)

Our Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is stirring the Middle East "peace" pot to the point of endangering Israel's existence.

Only Last Thursday, January 11th, in an inciting speech he gave in rally in Ramallah, on the occasion of the 42nd anniversary of Fatah's first attack on Israel, the PA president Mahmud Abbas used expressions such as "our rifles, all our rifles are aimed at the occupation," "occupation," "right of return," and "...invite Hamas and Islamic Jihad to join the PLO, which he heads," while rejecting the notion of a Palestinian state with temporary borders. Additionally, his statement "Today more than any other day, we must hold fast to our Palestinian principles...We will not give up one grain [of land] in Jerusalem," resonated.

This absolutely puts the lie to any notion of Abbas as a moderate.

What this really mean is that Abbas is calling to form a joint forces with other Palestinian terror groups, such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, he is clearly moving away from any possible sincere productive peace negotiations with Israel and a right out call for full fledge war on Israel.

Yet only three days after Abbas's most provocative speech, Secretary Rice, who is hopping from place to place in the region held a meeting with Abbas. After the meeting she made clear she still persists in advancing her alternative-universe thinking and is still making the effort to bolster Abbas, so that he will become strong enough to promote his "moderate" agenda, he declared three days earlier, he simply does not posses. Ms Rice still promises the USA will be helping the formation of a PA state and provide money for their security forces.

Among Rice's affinity statements she had the audacity to "promise" that the PA rifles won't be aimed at Israel and the U.S. will prevent a repeat of previous attacks on Israel with arms supplied to PA forces. "I want everyone to know, particularly the Palestinian people, how much we admire the leadership of President Abbas as a leader of the Palestinian people," she said, that clearly means she accepts Abbas to be the leader of the war he declared he is planning to wage on Israel.

What Ms Rice said in her speech full of hot air was au contraire to what Abbas has in mind and planned.

Ms. Rice's policy presents danger to Israel and to the long-term goals of the US in the region.

It's time to expose and deal with the hypocritical, anti-Israel policy of the US State Department.

I ask you to act properly and work to stop Condoleezza Rice's destructive path toward Israel.

With thanks,

Arlene Kushner can be reached at akushner@netvision.net.il She works as an investigative journalist for the Center for Near East Policy Research, and as an Israeli-based freelance writer. Contact her at akushner@netvision.net.il Or go to her website: www.ArlenefromIsrael.info

To Go To Top

ISLAM IS AT WAR WITH THE WORLD AND THE WORLD IS AT WAR WITH ISLAM: A WAR WITHOUT END
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 15, 2007.

Leaders of Western countries are playing a political game of "Pick & Choose" as to which Islamic nations are Terrorist States. If one can put these nations on a scale of one-to-ten, there are differences as to the degree of their support for Islamic Terror.

Sometimes it is easy, particularly when those nations barely hide their efforts to support and provoke Terror. For example, Iran and Syria would rate a full ten! for their years of terrorist activities and their support of terrorist organizations like Hezb'Allah, Hamas, Al Aksa Martyrs' Brigades (military arm of Fatah: Arafat and Abu Mazen's 'home' organization), PFLP, etc.

Then we can jump to what many see as a sliding scale of supporting radical Islam by Terror as the Sword -- while trying to "look moderate" -- with the help of Western leaders who do NOT want that nation labeled as a Terrorist enabler.

Here we find Saudi Arabia which has funded Terrorist organizations who carry out significant Terrorist acts -- such as the Al Qaeda and the Taliban. The Saudis fund Terror, weapons, training and safe houses -- in addition to funding Madrassahs (schools that teach the extreme Wahhabi form of Islam) and Mosques all over the world. Because of their oil, Western Governments pretend that none of this is happening -- or at least that the Saudis are "innocent". The Saudis are able to dictate to the U.S. to: "Jump" and the Bush Administration (through the State Department will say: "How high?"

The Europeans have completely succumbed to the Media and brain-washing pressure of Islam. As a result, they have started down the road to total submission. (Islam means: "submission"). Europe is being called "Eurabia" as Muslims overwhelm European countries with immigration and a virtual birth attack.

For a brief moment in time, President George W. Bush had a glimpse of the underlying matrix of Islam. He saw the Terror deeply embedded in the religion and the Muslims globally. He reacted correctly in Afghanistan and Iraq because of 9/11 as he had to. While he was his own man at the time, he did the right thing. By 2006 Iraq became a quagmire as the world of Islam started to pour "Mujahadin" (terrorists/fighters for Islam) into Iraq through Syria.

Then Bush began to wobble/ American soldiers did attack the terrorists but, they did so with reservations and so the attack lacked depth. This was not a war with Nazi Germany where both the military and the civilian population were conquered to the point of surrender. America did not fight the war in Iraq to a total submission -- mostly because neither Bush, the military nor the State Department were prepared for a real war.

America was not merely fighting a people but, she was engaged in a war of civilizations. Winston Churchill said it best when he observed that: "The Hun (Germany) is either at your throat or at your feet." The same is true for the Muslims, be they Saudi Arabs, Persians or Egyptians. The connecting thread is their religion, Islam and their manual of war, the Koran.

Unfortunately, we in the Free West are allowing our perception of civilization to blind us to the view of our enemy who operates mentally between the 7th and 12th Centuries. When Muslims follow the 7th Century teachings of Mohammed, they are either excessively friendly, drawing the unsuspecting into their web or savagely vicious when they are strong enough to defeat the "infidel" (non-Muslim) whom they are ordered to convert to Islam by the sword. The Muslims call those countries where Islam reigns: "Dar al Salaam" and where it doesn't "Dar al Harb". One waits for war while the other is at war. The goal of Muslims as stated in their Koran and oral teachings is for a Global Muslims Caliphate, domination of the world by Islam.

Even today in the state of Spain, the Spaniards are fearful that the Islamists will follow the Koranic mandate and return to Cordoba. Muslims would maintain that it belongs to Islam because once the Muslims conquered it. They believe that wherever Muslims were once the dominant rulers and eventually driven out, today's Muslims must re-conquer it and re-establish Islamic law.

Why do I feel that we are once again in the same position as we were when Hitler moved forward to conquer Europe? Chamberlain signed the Munich Agreement with Adolph Hitler September 28, 1938 and gave him the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia for "Peace in Our Time": the traditional symbol of "Appeasement in Our Time". The Allies could have stopped Hitler long before we had to sacrifice American troops to rescue Europe. In so doing we rescued America before Hitler was able to conquer most of Europe and move on to America.

Granted pro-German interests in Washington believed that Hitler had the right idea. The head of the U.S. State Department's John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles first head of the CIA could have given testimony as to Hitler's plan as could have General Motors, Henry Ford and a host of Banks who supported Hitler's concept of defeating Stalin's form of Communism.

I wonder what either the Republicans or Democrats will be saying prior to the 2008 elections when the Islamic Hitler (Ahmadinejad) moves into even more aggressive actions -- this time with nuclear weapons and missiles that can reach Europe, Russia and Israel -- with ships that can carry nuclear bombs to America.

How fast will they back-pedal when American cities are hit with dirty or even "regular" nuclear bombs? There is a difference. Will we hear from their speeches about how they were really fighting radical Islam? That's really a misnomer. Delete the word of "radical" because all of Islam is radical. It's in their book, their hearts and their doctrine to conquer the world.

Again, we could have stopped Hitler at an early time but, we in the Free West choose avoidance until Pearl Harbor. America had a mini-Pearl Harbor in 9/11 but, we only had a partial awakening of our "Sleeping Giant". (In 1941 one of the Japanese admirals warned that Pearl Harbor "Awakened a Sleeping Giant.")

The statement that we do not belong in Iraq, repeated by Howard Dean and other Democrats, has been repeated "ad nauseam". The fact is that we should have been more aggressive to the point where we were not restrained by TV news who highlight the fact that American soldiers die in war. The next set of people unlucky enough to die will be American civilians in far greater numbers. Then all of our brilliant politicians will fall all over themselves to say they it wasn't their fault, we were not at war to attack Islam more directly but to attack Terrorism performed in the name of Islam.

While there are many things about which I disagree with President George W. Bush, his declared war against Global Terror and those States who harbor Terrorists was correct. Too bad he later started to listen to his father, James Baker III and the pro-Arab State Department in their plan to "pacify" Islamic Arabs.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

MUSLIMS MAY BECOME MAJORITY IN GERMANY BY 2046; AND OUTNUMBER ETHNIC RUSSIANS WITHIN 30 YEARS
Posted by Sacha Stawski, January 15, 2007.

Muslims may become majority in Germany by 2046:
United Press International
www.upi.com/Arabia2000/view.php?StoryID=20070115-845713-9011-r

IRNA Germany-Muslims-Population Muslims could become a majority in Germany as early as 2046, the Berlin-based B.Z quoted Monday an interior ministry-financed study as saying.

Sparked by the steady influx of Muslim migrants into Germany, Muslims could form the largest share of the German population by 2046, said the study conducted by the Islam-Archive Central Institute, located in the western town of Soest.

The Islamic think-tank reported over the weekend that there has been a sharp rise in the number of Germans converting to Islam.

Around 4,000 Germans converted to Islam between July 2004 and June 2005 which is four times as many as in the prior space of time, according to the study which will soon be released in full details.


"Russia sees Muslim population boom"
By Jonah Hull
english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ F8C5F608-FA29-4BB3-A7CA-A6F05B98BE23.htm

The Muslim population could outnumber ethnic Russians within 30 years

Low domestic birth rates and rising immigration from the former Soviet republics have produced an explosive growth in Russia's Muslim community.

At the same time Russia's overall population is in crisis. Short life spans and low birth rates among ethnic Russians mean the population is declining by 700,000 people a year.

The return of long-denied religious freedoms in Russia has seen Islam flourish. As a result, many ethnic Russians fear their country is losing its national identity.

There are around 25 million Muslims in Russia today, a rise of 40 per cent since 1989.

By 2020, with the continued growth rate, Muslims will account for one-fifth of the entire population.

Immigration

Their numbers continue to grow, fed by immigration from largely Muslim, former Soviet republics in the North Caucasus and Central Asia.

Islamic leaders have said that Russia is a haven for Muslim immigrants, keen to work and build on their growing community, and they discount the rise of hostile nationalist sentiment.

"When they say Russia is for Russians, it's a mistaken path that could lead to the break-up of the Russian Federation"

Damir Gizatullin, Council of Muftis

Damir Gizatullin, from the Council of Muftis, said: "Some irresponsible politicians want to achieve electoral success by creating nationalist waves.

"When they say Russia is for Russians, it's a mistaken path that could lead to the break-up of the Russian Federation."

Many ethnic Russians are terrified at the prospect of becoming a minority in their own country.

Alexander Belov, from the Movement Against Illegal Immigration, said: "History is a fight between races and religions.

"It's the law of nature ... people are used to being with people like themselves, speaking the language their mothers taught them."

The Orthodox Church, restored since the Soviet collapse, remains dominant in Russia.

But with the rise of Islam, coupled with the negative growth in Russia's ethnic Slav population, dramatic change is under way.

If the trend continues, the Muslim population could outnumber ethnic Russians within 30 years.

Contact Sacha Stawski at info@honestly-concerned.org

To Go To Top

HAIFA COMPANY TRANSFORMS ROCKS TO FUEL
Posted by Mordechai Ben-Menachem, January 15, 2007.

This article was written by Hana Levi Julian and it appeared on the ISRAEL21c website,
http://www.israel21c.org/bin/en.jsp?enPage=HomePage

An Israeli company has patented a way to turn oil shale rock into high quality oil and natural gas -- a project that may bring jobs to the Negev and low-cost energy to the Jewish state.

The "Hom-Tov" process, brainchild of A.F.S.K. Hom Tov CEO Yisrael Feldman, involves mixing the bitumen residue left over after refineries produce crude oil together with oil shale rock.

Refinery production leaves a minimum residue of ten percent bitumen -- also known as asphalt -- per barrel of crude oil. The substance is used today only for road work or waterproofing materials because it requires too much additional processing to be used for conventional fuel, but is a key component in the "Hom Tov" process.

According to Hebrew University Professor Ze'ev Aizenshtat, an energy resource expert, the method also results in a dry fuel byproduct that can be used to power the "Hom Tov" production plant, as well as provide additional electricity for the national grid.

Feldman told ISRAEL21c that his method was first introduced in 1992 as a way to extract combustible organic material which could then be used to produce oil at a fraction of the current refinery cost. In 1994, then-Energy Minister Moshe Shahal ordered further investigation in the hope that researchers could come up with a way to produce quality oil at rock-bottom prices. Shahal's hopes were soon realized.

A Boon for the Negev

Backers of the project are now considering placing a production plant in the Negev, where oil shale is plentiful and has already been unearthed by phosphate plants that must dig past the rock in order to reach the lower minerals they seek.

The rock itself contains approximately 20 percent organic material and has been used as a direct fuel for more than a century in countries such as Brazil, China, Estonia and Russia.

The proposed Negev plant, depending on its size, will be able to produce up to 30 percent of Israel's energy needs for the next 70 years, at an initial construction cost of $700 million.

Ultimately, the plant could produce oil that would cost only $25 per barrel, half the cost of today's crude -- a financial bonanza for the Haifa-based company. "We won't see that price for oil again," says Feldman.

There are other benefits that may ultimately be derived from the process as well. Aizenshtat says the "Hom Tov" method may be used in the future to recycle industrial refuse such as tires, plastics and manufacturers' waste from pesticide and fertilizer plants.

The price of the oil produced from refuse may be different, but the end result is the same -- alternative fuel at a fraction of today's prices.

"The world is looking for a replacement for oil supplies," observes Shahal, an attorney who now serves as the project's legal representative.

The company is already in the process of applying for construction and mining permits. If approved, the plant is expected to begin full production by 2011.

Mordechai Ben-Menachem is at Ben-Gurion University. He can be reached by email at quality@computer.org

To Go To Top

THE LATEST WAVE OF TREASON AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 15, 2007.

A while back, we posted an item about how the leftist anti-Zionists on the faculty of Tel Aviv University, of which there are ever so many, were planning an "academic conference" dedicated to the idea that imprisoned Palestinian mass murderers and terrorists are in fact "political prisoners", deserving of sympathy and support.

Now ordinarily, this would be the sort of story that the mainstream Israeli media would studiously ignore and one that only Plaut listers and readers of inciting blogs would hear about. But on Jan 12, 07, Ben Dror Yemini (deputy editor of Maariv) devotes an entire full page in Maariv to this "academic" atrocity (in Hebrew, at http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/529/615.html ).

The basic theme of the conference, sponsored in part by the Tel Aviv University Law School (a bastion of the pro-terror Left), was that Palestinians who blow up pregnant women and their children and then get imprisoned are "political prisoners". Yemini in his column points out that "rights discourse" is now little more than a weapon being used to destroy Israel by Israel's enemies and by the enemies of human freedom. He mocks "progressives" who rationalize the murderous behavior of terrorists as part of "understanding the Other".

Restrictions on such misuses of academic freedom as the pro-terror conference at Tel Aviv University are, says Yemini, no different from restrictions on Holocaust Denial. That is because Holocaust Denial is not an academic or scholarly theory at all but merely a political weapon of hate. So is "academizing" terror and mass murder. Such a "conference" is little more than an attempt at promoting the anti-Semitic agenda, adds Yemini.

He writes that the fact that such a conference took place at Tel Aviv University is testament to growing Israeli insanity and an Israeli death wish. He mocks the conference participants as "serious people, sensitive to the sufferings of others". (His tone is one of irony.) He points out that all the "human rights groups" operating in Israel have an explicit anti-Israel political agenda, one that denies Israel's very right to exist. The "Physicians for Human Rights" used to be run by a certain Ben Gurion University anti-Semite about whom Alan Dershowitz wrote that he "got into bed with neo-nazis and anti-Semites."

Yemini then notes that an unnamed member of the Board of Governors of Tel Aviv University wrote him (Yemini) a note about this "conference", asking whether Tel Aviv University would next run an academic conference on the question of how to murder Jews while enjoying oneself. "Why not," wrote the man to Yemini, "after all, there are no limits on academic freedom at Tel Aviv University!" Yemini compares the "academics" at the TAU conference to those at the Tehran neo-nazi conclave.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com.

To Go To Top

HITBODEDUT -- AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL PRAYER
Posted by Avodah, January 15, 2007.

This comes from Lazer Beams, the web journal of Emuna Outreach.
http://lazerbrody.typepad.com/lazer_beams/2007/01/hitbodedut_an_i.html

Emuna Outreach has been working overtime lately. We're increasingly using the medium of video presentations to deliver the message of Jewish Outreach and Rebbe Nachman's teachings far and wide, quickly and enjoyably.

Rabbi Lazer Brody

Today, you're invited to ride out to the Judean Hills with me. Far off the beaten track, there's a cave and spring that Jewish guerillas used as a hideout from the Romans during the Bar Cochba rebellion nearly 2000 years ago. It's a dream place for personal prayer. C'mon and join me right here. Let's see how hitbodedut - your own personal-prayer relationship with Hashem - is the key to emotional stability and true happiness.

For a healthy soul, it's best to take the advice of the best doctor of the soul there is; in my book, that's none other than Rebbe Nachman of Breslev. Rebbe Nachman stresses the importance of spending at least 60 minutes a day in personal prayer. Hashem is always available, with or without an appointment.


Rabbi Lazer Brody was born in Washington, D.C. in 1949. After receiving his bachelor's degree in agriculture from the University of Maryland in 1970, he moved to Israel and joined the Israel Defense Forces regular army, and served in one of the elite special-forces units. He is a decorated combat veteran of two wars and dozens of counter-insurgence and anti-terrorist missions on both sides of Israel's borders.

After surviving a near-suicidal mission to Beirut during the Israel-Lebanon conflict of 1982, Brody could no longer ignore the hand of G-d in his life. He became a baal-tshuva and left his mountaintop farm to study Torah in Jerusalem.

Nine years of intensive Talmudic, ethics, and legal studies, led to his rabbinical ordination in 1992. He devoted another two years of postgraduate study to personal and family counseling, and subsequently spent two years as rabbi and spiritual rehabilitation director of a major Israeli prison. There, he created a highly successful program of spiritual rehabilitation for prisoners based on Tshuva.

In 1996, Brody moved to Ashdod and became the understudy of the famed Melitzer Rebbe, a contemporary giant in rabbinical law and personal counseling. Two years later, Rav Shalom Arush opened a branch of his renowned of the "Chut Shel Chessed -- Breslev" Yeshiva in the port city of Ashdod, and appointed Brody as the "Rosh Kollel", or Dean of the rabbinical program.

Today, Lazer Brody dedicates his time to Jewish Outreach, and particularly to spreading the teachings of Rebbe Nachman of Breslev around the globe.

Brody's first book, "Pi Habe'er", is a contemporary commentary of Torah based largely on the teachings of Rebbe Nachman of Breslev. The book has been widely acclaimed, and has received the approbations of Rishon Le'Tzion Rabbi Ovadiah Yossef, the Bes Din of the Eda Haredis in Jerusalem, Rabbi Eliezer Berland, and others. His second book, "Nafshi Tidom", is a unique guide to coping with verbal abuse, embarrassment and insult.

Brody's third book -- his first in English -- is "The Trail to Tranquility", published by Llumina Press, and available at www.llumina.com.

Brody's newest book, "The Garden of Emuna", is a translation of Rav Shalom Arush's best-selling "B'Gan Ha"emuna".

Contact: You can reach Rabbi Lazer Brody at rabbi_lazer@ahoo.com.

Contact Avodah at avodah15@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

JOHN BOLTON: MIDEAST PEACE EFFORTS A WASTE
Posted by Bryna Berch, January 14, 2007.

This is from an interview with John Bolton on Fox News.
www.discoverthenetwork.org/Articles/Mideast%20 Peace%20Efforts%20a%20Waste.html

Read the Sunday Times interview with John Bolton.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2546055,00.html

As Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice meets with Mideast leaders to jumpstart the peace process, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton called the attempt a waste of time.

Bolton, who also said it's time another body replace the United Nations, told the Sunday Times of London the Arab-Israeli conflict was "not a priority," adding: "I don't see linkage to Iraq, and Hamas and Fatah are in a state of civil war."

Now back at American Enterprise Institute, Bolton let loose on a variety of topics during the interview, from negotiating nuclear weapons with Iran to the reunification of the Korean peninsula.

"I wouldn't have engaged in negotiations with Iran in the first place," he told the paper, in a nod to Britain, France and Germany, nations that have made contact with Tehran. "The policy has failed. Sanctions won't stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons."

Bolton said President Bush and his administration would "rather find a way for diplomacy to succeed but time is running out -- that's me speaking."

Regime change, he said is "preferable" to a U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear sites, though "the only course worse than the use of force is an Iran with nuclear weapons."

"President Bush has said it is unacceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons and he will not accept it," Bolton said.

"There are all kinds of ways to change the regime," he said, mentioning covert and overt means to topple the government. "We have an extensive diaspora of people with Iranian heritage in America who we don't use effectively."

As to the threat of nuclear weapons posed by North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il, Bolton said that the only solution was through a "peaceful reunification of the [Korean] peninsula."

The vocal critic of the U.N. still believes that other organizations such as NATO might be better suited to governing world affairs.

"Fifteen years ago people said NATO would either go out of area or out of existence and now it is in Afghanistan and it is all but NATO -- absent Germany and France," he said. "I think NATO should go global. There is no reason why Japan and Australia shouldn't join."

In Bolton's view, America needs to take the lead in global affairs because "Who else will?"

To Go To Top

WE ARE SIMPLY CRAZY
Posted by May Leiner, January 14, 2007.

This was written by Isaac Kohn and it was published today in Arutz Sheva
(http://israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=6850). Isaac Kohn lives in Brooklyn, New York.

This is an excerpt from "Abbas urges: "Raise Rifles Against Israel" in WorldNetDaily and written by Aaron Klein.

"Raise [your] rifles against the Israeli occupation," Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas declared Thursday in Ramallah.

In a speech commemorating the 42nd anniversary of the founding of his Fatah party, the PA chief called on Arab factions to put an end to weeks of infighting and instead fight Israel.

"Shooting at your brother is forbidden. Raising rifles against the occupation is our legitimate right, but raising guns against each other is forbidden. We should put our internal fighting aside and raise our rifles only against the Israeli occupation," said Abbas in a speech in the Muqata compound in Ramallah attended by World Net Daily.

Abbas' call to arms was not reported by most major media outlets featuring articles on the Palestinian leader's speech.

I am thoroughly convinced that a certain mental defect has settled deep inside the Jewish brain, which definitely categorizes us as, by far, the craziest people ever to inhabit this universe.

Civilizations came and went, empires rose and fell, and many tribes and nations that once existed are no more. Hundreds of millions were killed, murdered, exterminated and wiped off the face of the earth. That is the history of this world, as intolerance, jealousy and hate commingle into a mix destined to erupt. It will never change. Today's wars are no different.

But nowhere, not ever, has there existed a people on this earth who have done everything within their power to help their sworn enemies to destroy them. Nowhere in history does one read about a people who armed, trained, supplied and encouraged their enemies to do all they can to kill and destroy the same people who have just granted them all of the possibilities to do just that. Empires fought to survive, the ultimate goal was to protect an empire's people. Where in the annals of ancient to present history is there a record of a people self-inflicting the methodology that will destroy them? Where?

Where, you ask? Here, in the State of Israel, which does everything in its power to enable the Arab murderers to accomplish their mission of destroying the state and exterminating its Jewish population. The imbeciles who run the country have employed every deceiving means -- yet deceiving no-one but themselves -- to bring about the state's destruction. And the general public is either exhausted, blind or deaf as it allows this to go on unchecked. As I said, we are totally crazy.

What is so hard to comprehend? The above statement by the Yasser Arafat protege and Holocaust denier is nothing we need to be surprised at. A leopard does not change its spots. What he said last week is what he said throughout his career as Israel's next door, murderer-neighbor. Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, Fatah, Hizbullah, Arafat, Abu Abbas or Ahmed Yassin -- the names are different, but the ideology is one and the same. The aim and goal is the ultimate destruction of Israel and the extermination of its people.

How loud must one shout for the world media in general, and Israel's in particular, to take note of what is being said? How long will we bury our head in the sand and claim that all is well because we refuse to see the true danger?

They waged wars on Israel since the day of its creation. And the one in 1967 was a war against Israel by an enemy determined to annihilate. Not a war to conquer or capture, or to hold for barter. The enemy was determined to kill, murder and destroy the State of Israel in order to "correct the terrible mistake" foisted on the Arab world by the United Nations. And the world stood by as Israel went at it alone, with G-d leading her to victory.

Can anyone question what the result would have been if, G-d forbid, the tide had turned the other way? How many of us would have survived the long swim across the Mediterranean Sea? How many condemnations would the UN have issued to force the Arabs to relinquish what they conquered? How much pressure do you think the US, Russia and the EU would have applied to force Egypt, Jordan and Syria to retreat?

Israel was immediately pressured and cajoled and threatened. And our leaders capitulated; like dominoes falling against each other. Israel's resolve and determination cracked and broke apart as it began to placate and soothe the enemy. So, we surrendered liberated lands to terrorist murders sworn to continue the struggle against the Jews. Against all predictions and warnings that these surrendered areas will turn into terrorist-infested cities of refuge, Israel drew a map of A territory and B areas and C sections. Under US and European pressure, we gave them guns and ammunition, and armed them to the teeth. And we said nary a word as the world gave them billions of dollars in order to feed the population, but which was used instead to purchase additional weaponry.

And they "thanked" Israel; thanked us in a big way, by bombing buses and malls, by murdering children and women, by launching rockets and mortars. Thousands were wounded and killed in their insatiable thirst for Jewish blood. But we couldn't very well sit by and watch all of this carnage without taking a strong stance, could we? No.

So, Israel's hero invoked his brilliant plan of placating and surrendering to the enemy by destroying the Gaza settlements and expelling the Jews of the area. Forewarned that Gaza will turn into Hamasland, Ariel Sharon paid no heed in his turn-coat insistence on placating Israel's worst enemy since Nazi Germany. We know the end result. No need to detail his sin against his own people. The hundreds of Kassams on Sderot and the Negev speak volumes in attesting to his misdeeds.

We are simply crazy if we don't listen carefully and understand that the above speech was given at the Fatah rally by the same man that our esteemed, again-under-investigation-for-corruption prime minister, Ehud Olmert, hugged and kissed a mere few days ago. This is the same vermin who received a generous gift of $100 million dollars from Israel's prime minister. This is the same snake to whom the US, just recently, pledged and gave $86 million dollars to bolster his tottering chair. And seven thousand guns and a million round of ammunition was given an Israeli green light, to be delivered to the above-mentioned hatemonger, in order to "strengthen his position" against Hamas. This is the enemy who spoke loud and clear about the need to turn those same guns against Israel. This is the bloodthirsty enemy whom Israel is promoting as "our peace partner."

When are we going to learn that, as far as our enemy is concerned, the only good Jew is a dead Jew? What will it take for Israel's leftist, pro-Arab, anti-Israel media to open its eyes and see the truth? When will we Jews understand once and for all that the Arabs mean what they say and that they will employ every possible avenue to reach their ultimate goal? When?

Contact May Leiner at mayleiner@cs.com

To Go To Top

ARAB-MUSLIM RACISTS! CHEROKEES SHOULD PROTEST THIS!
Posted by Lisa Rubin, January 14, 2007.

The excerpts from an article called "Rice says she registers Mideast demands" by Anne Geran, AP Diplomatic Writer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070114/ap_on_re_mi_ea/rice are in gray boxes.
The photos are not part of the original article.

Palestinian protesters dressed as Native Americans. What an insult to native Americans!

One would think that these "protestors" would be thanking the Jews for the armed guards, non? I'd like to see them protest against the Saudi regime and see how far it gets them.

RAMALLAH, West Bank -- President Bush's top diplomat tried to assure Palestinians on Sunday she has heard their demands for a stronger U.S. hand to guide peace efforts with Israel. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, however, offered no new plans and gave few clues to how she views recent initiatives proposed by others.

"I have heard loud and clear the call for deeper American engagement in these processes," she said after meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "You will have my commitment to do precisely that."

An Israeli soldier stands guard as Palestinian protesters dressed as Native Americans hold signs at the Hawara checkpoint just outside the West Bank city of Nablus January 14, 2007. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in a bid to bolster President Mahmoud Abbas, pledged on Sunday to expand Washington's role in the peace process with the goal of establishing a Palestinian state. (Abed Omar Qusini/Reuters)

Seeking to strengthen Abbas in his power struggle with the Palestinian Hamas faction, Rice said it is time "to look at the political horizon and begin to show to the Palestinian people how we might move toward a Palestinian state."

A proposed $85 million grant to train and equip the historically troubled security service loyal to Abbas would come with strings attached, Rice said. A State Department official said none of the money would go to purchase weapons. Abbas promised the money would not be misused.

The Palestinian leader, whose Fatah faction lost elections a year ago to the Islamic militants of Hamas, said the weapons were needed to impose order after weeks of Fatah-Hamas fighting that has killed 35 people.

The dispute has alarmed some of Abbas' Arab neighbors, including Jordan's King Abdullah II. He has warned of the possibility of three civil wars in the Middle East -- in Iraq, the Palestinian territories and Lebanon -- and asked for renewed U.S. diplomacy.

Despite signs of life in the moribund Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Rice encountered skepticism from both sides in two days of meetings with Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

Abbas rejected one idea Sunday that Israel considers promising: the establishment of a provisional Palestinian state in temporary borders.

Abbas also complained to Rice that Israel has not followed through on promises made at his much-awaited meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert last month.

Israeli media reported that hardline deputy prime minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told Rice that the Israeli Army will have to re-enter the Gaza Strip at some point, and that 30,000 U.N. troops are needed to secure the chaotic Palestinian territory on Israel's southern flank.

Lieberman has in the past said Israel should assassinate Hamas' leadership, ignore the moderate Palestinian president and walk away from international peace efforts. His ideas do not necessarily carry weight, but Rice defended the decision to meet with him.

"I'm going to enlist the support of anybody I can to try and move forward a Palestinian state living at peace side by side with Israel," Rice said. "That is the goal here."

Rice tried to lower expectations for talks meant to help frame possible peace initiatives for Bush's remaining two years in office. Various ideas under consideration would rearrange elements of a U.S.-backed peace plan dormant since its release in 2003.

Rice said the United States wants to "accelerate" the peace plan, but she has not given specifics.

The plan envisions a three-stage, three-year program to create an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The step-by-step approach seeks specific concessions from both sides before moving to new issues, meaning it quickly can bog down if the conditions are not met.

Before Rice arrived, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni had seemed to endorse the notion of skipping some of the elements of the plan's first phase and jumping to the second phase, which would set up a placeholder state with temporary borders.

Livni gave a much vaguer description of that idea in a session with Rice on Saturday. Although Rice has not ruled it out, she has not explained how it would fit into the overall deal.

Palestinian officials in recent weeks have grown wary of the idea, believing it would enable Israel to usurp much of the West Bank, where Israel continues to build Jewish settlements.

Contact Lisa Rubin at elishevarubin@msn.com

To Go To Top

WHY EUROPE HATES ISRAEL? BECAUSE IT HATES THE US
Posted by Yid With Lid, January 14, 2007.

American Thinker published a great article called Why Europe Abandoned Israel. The piece talks about the relationship between Europe and Israel. Written by Richard Baehr it not only gives a history of the relationship but also adds perspective to European hatred of the Jewish state today. I have created a "Reader's Digest" version of the report and posted it below.

Baehr reminds us that up to 35-40 years ago European nations could be counted among Israel's biggest supporters. In fact, prior to the Six Day War in 1967, Israel used to get most of her weapons from France (yes THAT France).

His thesis is that part of Europe's animosity towards Israel is, in reality, a transference of its animosity toward the US. So to get the full picture you first need to explore why the EU hates the US:

Foreign Policy: Defense budgets in Europe are dropping. The US defense budget is larger than the next 20 largest defense budgets in the world combined. The European solution is to solve problems multilaterally, and not by military means. Why? If a military solution is required, then Europe must follow the American lead and be in America's shadow. This is a dignity issue. If international problems are addressed multilaterally, then Europe has 27 EU nations, and in international forums like the UN, Europe has more than 30 votes, and the US just one.

Lifestyle issues: There is also an attitude or life style issue at play between Europe and America. Western Europeans want to believe that all international disputes can be resolved amicably, or as they call it, diplomatically, and multilaterally. ... One explanation for this somewhat naïve view of addressing the world's problems is that Europe is militarily and spiritually weak and willing to appease those who might threaten the European life style.

Bruce Bawer, who left America for what he thought was a better place in Western Europe, has documented the spiritual emptiness of this new multicultural ideology in his recent book While Europe Slept.

Population decline: The most up to date demographic forecasts project that every single European country will have a smaller population in the year 2050 than today with the possible exception of Ireland and France. In Russia the death rate is now 1/3 greater than the birth rate. Russia may be half its current size in 50 years, as might some of the Baltic States. Italy is projected to be 1/4 smaller. Every minute on average, there are 3 births and 4 deaths in Russia. Mark Steyn in his new book America Alone, argues that demography is destiny. He concludes, a bit hyperbolically, that Europeans are in the throes of a death spiral.

So Europe's population is aging and declining, and workers want to work less. This creates huge social issues. Who will do the work that Europeans increasingly do not want to do themselves (maid service, child care, working with the elderly, dishwashers)? Who will pay the taxes to support the social services which are skewed, as in the US, towards the elderly, a rapidly growing bloc?

Rising Muslim population: Immigrant groups have changed the social dynamic. Crime is way up in center cities. European cities still have lower murder rates than American cities but higher overall crime rates in many cases. The new immigrants, especially the Muslim immigrants, have not mixed well with the native population. Entire immigrant communities have taken over sections in major cities, particularly in France, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Belgium. Half the babies born in Brussels are Muslim. The city of Malmo, Sweden, has become so dangerous that the fire department will not come for an emergency call in certain neighborhoods without police protection.

Current estimates are that at least 20 million Muslims now live in Western Europe. A few years back, I met with a French consul general to complain about French anti-Semitism, which of course he denied. When I told him that the French were kowtowing to the Muslim minority because it was ten times the size of its Jewish community, he cut me off to say there were only 4 million Muslims in France, not 6 million as I was implying. A year later, 6 million is the official estimate the French accept. There are also 3 million Muslims in Germany (mainly Turks), 2 million in Britain (mainly Pakistanis), and a million each in Italy and the Netherlands (both mostly from North Africa). A recent article I read says the real Muslim population in France may be between 8 and 9 million, as illegal immigration, aided and abetted by Europe's new open borders, has brought more and more Arabs to the country in Europe where they were most numerous already: France.

One forecast I read suggests that France may be half Muslim by 2050 given continued immigration and the much higher birth rate for Muslims than other French....will France still be French if it is half Muslim? David Pryce Jones in an article in Commentary stated that either Islam will be Europeanized, or Europe will be Islamized. Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis put it more starkly: given the comparative birth rates (white Europeans very low, Muslims very high) and immigration levels, soon enough Europe will be Muslim, and the question will be answered.

The numbers provide important background to explain Europe's problems with Israel and its seeming obtuseness and infinite patience in continuing to defend and financially support the PA with billions in contributions, though the money is continually diverted for terrorism (otherwise known as security forces) and to support the lifestyles of the PA's thugocracy. It also explains Europe's near 100% support for Israel-bashing efforts in the UN and international bodies. With the Hamas election victory, many in Europe agreed to an initial aid cutoff, but soon wanted aid restored, because they believed it was needed for humanitarian purposes.

Hostility to Israel as the product There are a number of factors that explain European behavior towards Israel. I have identified seven of them:

  1. Europe's dependence on Middle East oil: The US obtains almost 40% its oil from domestic sources, and much of the rest from Venezuela, Nigeria, and other non-Arab or Middle East countries. Europe is much more dependent on foreign oil, and especially Middle East oil.

  2. Europe's rivalry with the US: Taking a slap at Israel is a cheap and easy way to annoy the US, and insert Europe in a competing power role. The US is too pro-Israel, so Europe will be more balanced and nuanced, more multilateral, more understanding of the Palestinian side. The old argument was that only the US could pressure Israel, so Arabs needed to work with the US as well. Now the European argument is that only Europe can work with the PA given America's tilt towards Israel.

  3. The growing number of Muslims and their militancy: Europe is afraid of its Muslims. There is fear that if Europe behaves towards Israel the way the US does, that the terrorism of 9/11 and the terror that Israel experiences would explode over into Europe's streets. This explains why Spain voted for an appeasement government after the train attacks of 3/11. This is why the violence against Europe's Jews is explained away as youth vandalism, not as racist hate crimes. The Muslim gang members who commit crimes against Europe's Jews have no fear of the police in European cities.

    Yes, Muslims in Europe are often treated as second class citizens, and they are resentful. But most of this resentment comes from the hostility that is bred into those who attend the mosques of Europe, and learn from the imams trained in Saudi style Wahhabism in the Saudi Kingdom or Pakistan. The Muslims in Europe are by and large not integrated into the fabric of their societies, but much of this is not a result of discrimination, but a conscious decision to remain outside the new secular Europe.

  4. The small number of Jews, and their passivity: Other than France and Britain, there are not many Jews around in Europe today. The total Jewish population is a little over a million in Western Europe, and merely a handful in Eastern Europe other than the former Soviet republics. There has been a little Jewish revival in Germany caused by immigration from the Soviet Union. So we see declining numbers everywhere else; aging population, low birth rate, high intermarriage rate. Does this sound familiar? The Jewish communities in Europe are in many cases remnants of once larger communities, and are not politically assertive. There is no European equivalent of AIPAC, and Jews lack a meaningful political voice. Most European Jews before 1939 lived in Eastern Europe, not Western Europe. France has twice as many Jews today as it did in 1939 as a result of getting a sizable share of the Sephardic Jews expelled from Arab countries after the creation of the state of Israel, particularly from Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. In Western Europe Jews are looking for cover. Wear a yamulka in a public places, and you could become a target. Eat at a Jewish cafeteria, go to synagogue, go to a Jewish day school, and you might become a target. You are even a target after you are buried. The worst anti Semitism is in France, but it is also terrible in Belgium and Germany, and bad in other countries as well. The more critical the governments and media are of Israeli behavior in a particular country, the more the violence seems to spread, almost as if it were given a license. Were European government policy to become more supportive of Israel, the fear is that the attacks would then be directed against European institutions, rather than Europe's Jews.

  5. The role of elites in Europe's politics: In Europe the elites have a far different role than they do in the United States. The elites of Europe are the coffee shop philosophers: leftists who romanticize the violence of Che Guevara, Yassar Arafat, and the Sunni killers fighting our forces in Iraq. They fancy themselves revolutionaries fighting western hegemony, colonialism, militarism, imperialism, etc. In the US we have such people too. They make up the humanities faculties of most colleges and universities, particularly at elite schools. Europe is very different. The elites are public intellectuals and have a major role in making government policy. This is why the mindless anti-Americanism of the German minister with her Hitler analogy to George Bush can be voiced. It is why major media in Britain and France and Italy, and to a lesser extent Germany, are full of biting anti American, and anti Israel commentary. That "shitty little country" comment by the French ambassador to Britain reflects the worldview of the European elites. Israel is the imperialist colonialist power. There is nothing noble about its struggle against terrorism. The Palestinians are the oppressed -- the new South Africans fighting the Israeli apartheid. Jimmy Carter has attempted to popularize this view in America with a vindictive assault on Israel in his latest book. In Europe, these views are not just a reflection of government policy caused by fear of domestic Muslim terrorism, but a romanticism for the presumed helpless victim, and admiration for the revolutionary gunmen fighting for their freedom. In Europe the elites believe this garbage. The anger against Israel among the elites is very strong. The coverage of the conflict by the leftist European media, the bibles of the elites -- The Guardian, Le Monde, the BBC, Reuters -- feed this anger with their reporting. Even something as seemingly innocent as an annual calendar, distributed by Reuters, contains but one provocative photo -- a Palestinian "militant" marching to protest the "killing" of Palestinians by Israel (obviously no context required). And recently, in a clear violation of the most basic tenets of academic freedom, both British and French academics have attempted to eliminate scholarly contact with Israeli academics.

  6. Europe's long term disease of anti-Semitism: Europeans have a Jewish problem. In fact with the exception of a few decades after World War 2, they always have had a problem with their Jews. But charges of anti Semitism are hurtful to Europeans. They want to put the past in the trunk and lock it for good. The centuries of discrimination, the pogroms, the ghettos, the Holocaust, are all ancient history, crimes of an older Europe. Anti-Israel attitudes are everywhere in Europe, -- in many cases official government policy, and are all over the media, from the BBC and Reuters to the tabloid rags.But anti Semitism is more problematic, since it violates Europeans' notion of human rights, and their more ordered higher quality societies. So the rejection of the charge is immediate and fierce. There is no more guilt about past behavior but defensiveness about current charges of Jew-hatred. Even Amnesty International has been forced to condemn suicide bombings as crimes against humanity because of the charge that by ignoring these atrocities, and concentrating instead on Israel's counter measures, it was anti Semitic, since murder of Jews did not concern them, only what happened to Arabs.

  7. The decline of Christianity in Europe: The decline in church membership in America is in the liberal Protestant churches -- the Episcopalians, Lutherans, Presbyterians -- the groups least sympathetic to Israel. Their members, of course, behave like most liberal Jews: they read the New York Times, listen to NPR, vote Democratic, and attend Michael Moore movies.

Evangelical Christians and practicing Catholics, on the other hand, are growing in numbers. And especially among evangelical Christians, support for Israel is very strong. This community, which has an above average number of births, is growing as a share of the population. That is good for political support for Israel here.

In Europe, the number of practicing Christians has fallen very far very fast. In Europe the elites routinely ridicule Christianity ( in fact they ridicule all religions, other than Islam), in the fashion of Bill Maher or Maureen Dowd. Europeans now have the lowest church attendance in the western world. In Britain, of those who attend Anglican church services, more than half are African or Caribbean blacks. There are exceptions of course -- Ireland and Poland are countries where many white Europeans still go to church. Current estimates are that 10% of Europe's population are practicing Christians, about double the number of Muslims on the continent. What is left -- the vast majority of Europeans -- are secular humanists or anti-religious right wingers, and Israel has no biblical or moral significance for either group.

In the case of the secular humanists, Israel's alleged misbehavior with the Palestinians is viewed as a thorn in the side of good relations with their Muslims. Israel's strongest supporters in Europe, much as in America, are the religious Protestants on the continent. But they are few and far between, and they themselves are the subject of the same scorn and hostility from the left as occurs here. The liberal Christian churches of Europe have been behaving for many years towards Israel, just as the Presbyterian Church USA has been behaving in the US, with its calls for divestment.

How bad has it gotten for Israel in Europe?

Public opinion surveys up through the end of 2003 showed huge majorities favoring the Palestinians over Israel, by 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 in the large countries and by 10 to 1 in some smaller ones. In the US, surveys showed 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 support for Israel over the Palestinians in the same period. The number of Europeans supporting the Palestinians dropped after the electoral victory by Hamas, but support for Israel did not increase. In a survey last year, Europeans named Israel the most dangerous country in the world, with the US and Iran tied for second! The media is least hostile to Israel in Germany (with greater care taken to not cross the line to anti-Semitism given the Germans' ignoble history), and most hostile in Britain, France, and Spain.

The public is also very hostile to Israel in Belgium, and in Scandinavia, which has no Jews to speak of. Norway took great pride in the Oslo Agreement. Foreign Minister Terje Larsen facilitated this agreement. Norway awarded a Nobel Peace Prize to Yassar Arafat (and Jimmy Carter). No one subsequently questioned whether Arafat was still deserving, but some questioned Shimon Peres' award because of his complicity in the "massacre" in Jenin, which of course never happened. Larsen is very hard on Israel and his attacks on Ariel Sharon were slanderous. In Jenin he knowingly lied about war crimes. There is a total unwillingness to accept that Oslo was a disaster for Israel. Sweden prides itself on its moral superiority and has condemned Israel in unusually strong language even for Europe. Let us not forget, however, that Sweden was neutral in World War 2 and grew wealthy selling war materiel to Hitler. Somehow they could not come around to choosing sides between the allies and the Nazis.

The international criminal court and the war crimes tribunals against Sharon in Belgium, and the International Court of Justice's advisory ruling on the security barrier in the West Bank, were other ways for Europeans to annoy America, badger Israel, and try to force a European role in American foreign policy and military decisions. But it also demonstrates the problem of moral equivalence (or in reality, the absence of any grounded morality) which is an endemic problem for Europeans. Sharon was viewed as equivalent to Milosevic. Sabra and Shattila were the same as Srebenica. The occupation and suicide bombings are viewed as equivalent. Without occupation, claim the European apologists for Palestinian violence, there would be no terror bombings or attacks.

Does Israel have any hope for better relations with Europe?

Europe will react better to an Israel run by someone from the left, and an Israel that shrinks. The withdrawal from Lebanon was applauded, as was the disengagement from Gaza. A Barak or a Peres, or an Olmert, in fact most anyone other than a Sharon or a Netanyahu, makes Europe happier. But Europeans, thankfully, do not get to vote in Israel's elections, or ours. Israelis will pick their leaders, just as we pick our own.

Ariel Sharon had no hope of ever getting a fair hearing in Europe. From the beginning, the Europeans viewed him as a war criminal. If a more moderate Palestinian leadership emerged and there were substantive peace talks and the appearance of flexibility on the part of Israel, Israel's public image in Europe could improve. There are lots of hypotheticals in this last statement of course, and a risk to Israel's security from trying to do too much to make the Europeans happier with Israel. So don't bet the ranch on it happening. I do not have much confidence that we are entering a new period of reconciliation between the Palestinians and Israel.

The recent intifada was a disaster for both peoples, but particularly for the Palestinians. In Israel, in addition to the dead and the injured and the destruction, the vicious terror war killed any sense of trust that had developed between the two sides, and gravely weakened what I call the illusionists -- the members of the Israeli peace camp who made the Palestinians' case within Israel. The electoral victory of Hamas, the war with Hezb'allah, and the strident and repeated eliminations threats coming from a near nuclear Iran, have hopefully wiped away most of the vestiges of defeatism -- the belief that more Israeli concessions will bring peace.

The Europeans demand that if negotiations are to begin again between Israel and the Palestinians, that Israel go back to where it left off at Camp David or Taba in early 2001 and forget its 1500 dead, the terror attacks, the vicious hate rhetoric and de-legitimization campaign that the Palestinians and their Arab allies have broadcast relentlessly in venues all around the world. The Israelis know that the Islamic terror groups, as well as the secular terror groups, are still armed to the teeth and remain aggressive in their intentions.

In Southern Lebanon, the UNIFIL and Lebanese army forces merely looked on as Hezb'allah rearmed after the war. Israel's conflict with Hezb'allah and the Palestinians has never been primarily about settlements or the occupation, as the Europeans charge, though these are issues that reasonable parties could negotiate. More basically we have two peoples claiming the same land. And the conflict will not end so long as most Palestinians and their allies believe that Palestinian land is not only the West Bank and Gaza, but Israel too.

The American-led war with Iraq was revealing for the divisions that it revealed within Europe, though on Israel the negative sentiment remained close to universal. Britain, Spain (under Aznar), Italy, and a few Eastern European countries provided troops and material support in the war effort. The French, Germans, Belgians, Greeks, and many other Europeans opposed the war for a variety of reasons. Certainly, there were legitimate strategic arguments that could be developed to explain why some might have been opposed to the war, just as in America. But in Europe, there were additional issues:

  1. The instability it might cause among their own Muslim populations which would need to be controlled.

  2. The potential loss of business investments and opportunities since Europeans willingly filled the gap left by America's boycott of business activity with Iraq.

  3. Because the war demonstrated America's military power, and Europe's weakness, military action meant the UN and diplomacy and multilateralism had not worked. Since these are the holy trinity of European international politics, the resistance to American action was deeply felt, and resented.

The Americans have learned that a country that only responds to attacks against it will continue to be attacked. Sometimes you have to take the battle to the enemy, as Israel did after the Passover massacre in Netanya, and the Americans did to Al Qaeda and the Taliban after 9/11 (and as FDR did by going after Germany first after Pearl Harbor, though we had been attacked by Japan, and not Germany, a piece of history that seems to have been largely forgotten). The best defense is often a good offense. As in football, keep the other side's offense off the field.

Other than Tony Blair, this doctrine is foreign to the Europeans. After the train bombings in Madrid in 2004, the newly elected peace government in Spain quickly removed their forces from Iraq. Appeasement did not work in Europe in 1938, and Spain's pitiful behavior will only encourage the Islamic radicals to intensify their efforts to undermine the soft regimes they see all over the continent. Now we have James Baker's Iraq Study Group Report, as good a European style document as we ever could hope to produce in this country. The ISG report maintains that the way to wind down our Iraq involvement is to plead for mercy from Syria and Iran (this is what is otherwise known in diplomatic circles as engagement), and to pressure Israel for concessions to the Palestinians. Is there anyone who seriously believes that anything Israel might offer to the Palestinians will impact how the rival religious insurgencies and militias behave in Iraq? And why would Syria and Iran, who have worked to destabilize Iraq, so that the Americans would pack up and leave, and allow them to share the spoils, care to solve the problems they helped create?

To his credit, Bush rejected the ISG recommendations, while paying them the required lip service. The US, at least under this president, remains hard headed about the enemies we face, regardless of the wisdom of the Iraq war. Israel needs the same kind of leadership.

In Europe, the fear of military conflict is so strong, that the illusionists reign supreme. Think of how pathetic was the European response to the savagery in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. In this country, the ties with Israel remain strong. Certainly, the support of evangelicals, the bipartisan support in Congress (thanks in large part to AIPAC and Jews' political activism), and the different sizes of the Jewish and Muslim communities here versus in Europe, all matter to the equation. But we should never under-estimate leaders, and the messages they send. George Bush seems to understand, that in the conflict with radical Islam in which we are now engaged, Israel is on the same page as we are.

There is much more to this article please read the entire piece at American Thinker January 18, 2007 at
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/why_europe_abandoned_israel_1.html

Contact Yid With Lid at yidwithlid@aol.com

To Go To Top

PLEASE ACT NOW TO OPPOSE BARGHOUTI RELEASE
Posted by Menachem Kovacs, January 14, 2007.

You know our cousin Dr. Alan Bauer and his son Yehonatan were victims of a terror attack in downtown Jerusalem as described in his enclosed letter to Ambassador Jones and in his article. Pls contact your Senators and Representatives and media_ now_ to publicly oppose this dangerous plan.

January 1, 2007

The Honorable Richard H. Jones
Ambassador
United States Embassy
71 HaYarkon Street
Tel Aviv 63903 Israel

Ambassador Jones:

Shalom. I am taking this opportunity to write in regards to a suicide bombing on 21 March 2002 in which my son Yehonathon and I were injured. As you may remember, I wrote to you a year ago on this subject and you were kind enough to reply to my note. As you can see from recent news reports, the Israeli government stands on the brink of releasing those involved in the terror attack in which we were injured. Many of those involved in planning and executing the attack were captured by Israeli authorities in 2002 and received jail sentences for their various roles in the bombing. The Israelis appear ready to release Marwan Barghouti (who paid $600 towards the success of the bombing) and the two women who brought the Fatah suicide bomber to downtown Jerusalem. These people have American blood on their hands and should not be let free. I hereby request a meeting at your first convenience to discuss this urgent matter. While I know from my contacts at the FBI and Justice, that the US cannot interfere with internal Israeli issues, these people attempted to murder American citizens and our injuries, hospitalizations and current medical states are an outcome of their premeditated actions. My family is terrified to think that these people will walk the streets again.

I look forward to meeting you as soon as possible.

Most sincerely,

Alan J. Bauer, Ph.D.
alan@biosd.com
49 Ussishkin, Jerusalem
011-972-54-5942801

cc: Hon. Senator Richard Durbin (Il.)
Hon. Senator Barack Obama (Il.)
Mr. Mark Steven Kirk (10th Distr. Il.)
Mr. Jake Walles US Consul General Jerusalem

Dr. Menachem Kovacs is Director, Jewish Roots Center of Education & Research on Torah & Israel and Professor Emeritus of Sociology Montgomery College Maryland. Contact him at takovacs@comcast.net

To Go To Top

DEFEATIST POLICIES CREATE DEFEATED NATIONS
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 14, 2007.

The sooner Israeli movers and shakers realize their fair nation must divorce itself from a defeatist policy unique among civil nations, the sooner it reverses that policy, the sooner it removes rose colored glasses prescribed by a blind ophthalmologist, the rosier will be the outlook for generations of Israelis yet unborn. No other civil nation in the world is expected to voluntarily cede land justifiably secured during war, especially a defensive war fought for survival, yet this 'chosen' state is expected to slice off sections of its relatively tiny anatomy, so tiny it extends over less than two tenths of one percent of a surrounding hostile mostly Muslim Middle East neighborhood, such sections rightly secured in 1967 as a consequence of vanquishing aggressive Arabs intent on annihilating this Jewish State. Furthermore, abstract promises of peace for tangible land will not be kept, witness the multitudes of Islamic jihadists affiliated and presumably unaffiliated with sovereign governments that will not rest until Jewish Israel is morphed into a Muslim nation bereft of Jews.

It is understandable that citizens of Israel collectively yearn to be blessed with secure peaceful lives, allowing them to raise families and live comfortably without constantly fearing the dreaded homicide/suicide grim reaper screaming 'God is Great', at that instant knowing their time on earth is up. It is up to wise convincing leaders however to comprehend the ways of their dysfunctional region of the planet, then explain to constituents that surrendering land would make their lives even less secure and peaceful, as hostile neighbors would sense weakness, gain courage, and torment them even more. Predators in the Middle East jungle, indeed, when sensing blood, go for the jugular of perceived falling prey. In less sanguinary terms, the best defense is a strong offense. Thus oh wise Israeli leaders; forthwith declaring Judea, Samaria, the Golan Heights, and all of Jerusalem sovereign territories of the State of Israel would be a most propitious policy (alas, if only Gaza was included), despite all the predictable worldwide protestations that would mean far less than even one stone atop Mount Hermon.

Indeed, prescient intrepid Israeli leaders should tell the world in no uncertain terms that Israel is prepared to give back territory, secured in 1967, to morphed Jordanian Arabs when the United States returns its Southwest, including California, Texas, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico to its erstwhile vanquished southern neighbor Mexico, or when Hell freezes over, whichever comes first. In fact, next time U.S. Secretary of State Condi Rice whips out her Israeli Palestinian Road Map, let Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ask this former Stanford provost if she's concocted an American Mexican Road Map depicting Tijuana in lieu of Sacramento as the capital of the State she once frequented, indeed for the sake of better relations and no more 'Yankee go Home' muttering (maybe Arnold could take a crash course in Spanish and remain as governor?) from occupied Mexicans. If the Israeli P.M. is too polite or perhaps too politically correct to confront her on this issue, maybe it is time to hold early elections, hopefully electing Bibi or a kindred spirit that will truly represent Israel's best interests.

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

A TEMPORARY PALESTINIAN STATE
Posted by Will Blesch, January 14, 2007.

This article is archived at http://willblesch.townhall.com

It has been about three weeks since I last wrote a blog. That's primarily due to the holiday season, working on a short film, and dealing with car issues. But, thankfully I've not really gone away and now, having read this morning's headlines on CNN.com, I am back with a vengeance.

Our good buddy, that 'Palestinian' "moderate" Mahmoud Abbas has told U.S. Secretary of State Condi Rice that any temporary 'Palestinian' State is not wanted by the 'Palestinian people.' Of course, if I were of the ideological persuasion that Abbas and the rest of the Arabs who hate Israel are, I too would be opposed to a temporary State. This is because it would be seen as charity by the Western powers rather than a victory for Islam.

No, in order to save face, and in order for Islam to be proclaimed throughout the Middle East legitimately as the only pathway to Heaven and each man's thousand virgins, the 'Palestinians', whether extremists like Haniyeh or moderates like Abbas, must achieve a full 'Palestinian' State and it must be accomplished through Jihad or by a seeming position of strength whereby the Arabs "take' what they believe is rightfully theirs.

The problem here is that, of course, I am in full agreement with Abbas on this issue. There should be no temporary 'Palestinian' State. Here is where I diverge from agreement with him though, I don't want ANY 'Palestinian' State to exist. See, I don't think they have any right to the land that the G-d of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob gave to Israel over three thousand years ago. The world constantly forgets (on purpose) that the Jews have had a claim to the land and have legitimately (at least by a remnant of people) lived in the land for that entire period. They didn't always have control, but there HAVE always been Jews that lived there. And it is, in fact, our ancient kingdom.

I don't think the United States has the right to interfere in the region. I don't think that the likes of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and company have the right to ASK for the U.S.'s interference. Is the U.S. Israel's strong tower? Is the good old U.S.A. Israel's fortress? Her shelter? Her banner proclaiming safety? Is the United States willing to guarentee Israel's safety and if they are, is the U.S. entirely trustworthy?

How can it be when President Bush, though seemingly more pro-Israel than his good old dad is willing to push for a peace plan which would not bring peace, is willing to listen to people like James Baker and yeah his dad too, both of whom are famous anti-Semites? And while Americans originally supported the war in Iraq, they've come to the conclusion that the Bush administration lied to them about the reasons for war in Iraq. Should Israel trust an American administration that is willing to lie to its own people? Sure Saddam Hussein was evil, and sure Saddam was bad for Israel and I can't say I'm sorry to see him gone and Iraq lessened as a nation, but if the Americans don't even see truth to rhetoric concerning their war, why in the world should Israel believe much of anything the Americans have to say either?

The vast majority of Christian evangelicals in the States, though friends of Israel by and large have somehow convinced themselves that while Jesus is at G-d's right hand, George W. Bush is at G-d's left. If Bush decides that his peace plan for Israel is the only way to go, are Israel's evangelical friends going to continue to stand by what the Bible actually says concerning the birthright G-d gave to Israel or will they follow their new shephard? After all, Bush is supposed to be a great Christian leader right?

What Israel needs is a backbone these days. What Israel needs is the ability to tell not only the Arabs, but the West and the entire world if need be to just go and take a flying leap. Because it's not the world's opinion that matters. It's not even the people of Israel's opinion that matters.

In the end there is only One who's opinion counts and it is Hashem and He alone that Israel should be listening to.

I mean, what if all these things are tests of Israel's faithfulness? Every time we ever leaned on anyone else for strength, or listened to the moanings and groanings of people who are pissed off at Israel over something we KNOW our G-d either gave us or told us to do, we became a broken and oppressed people.

Let's pass the tests given us. And the rest of the world be damned.

Contact Will Blesch at DawnTreader3@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

TIME FOR HESSED
Posted by Zeev Shemer, January 14, 2007.

B"H

A father of five, American Oleh living in northern Israel is in dire need of funds to undergo a kidney transplant. He is otherwise a healthy man, a Jewish activist that has helped countless Jews in need throughout Israel.

He has been undergoing dialysis for almost a year now and doctors have assured him that he is an excellent candidate for a transplant. Dialyses treatments are three times a week for four hours at a time not including travel time. Needless to say this has impacted on his ability to provide for his family. These treatments have also weakened him and might soon begin causing other unnecessary health problems.

The total cost of the operation is $120,000 US dollars and thanks to the generosity of many, $70,000 have already been raised. We urgently need to raise an additional $50,000 and we are confident that soon he can return to having a normal life. I thank you in advance for your generosity and ask that you pass this message along to anyone who you might think would open his heart and help us in this endeavor.

Donors can get a US tax deduction by making the check to:
Friends of B'Ahavat Yisrael
4809 Avenue N, PMB# 284
Brooklyn NY 11234

Or you can click on this link (copy and paste on your browser) to make a donation directly in Israel, that I will personally see delivered.

Click here for paypal.

May HaShem reward you for your kindness.
With Love of Israel,
Ze'ev Shemer
Ramat HaGolan
http://www.zeevshemer.com

THERE WILL NO MORE EMAILS OF THIS NATURE. THIS IS A ONE TIME URGENT APPEAL.

Contact Zeev Shemer at zeev.shemer@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
Posted by Naomi Ragen, January 14, 2007.

As much as we would like to sink into the mindless comfort of our untruthful media reporting from our lying politicians, we who love Israel, and of course those who actually live here and whose lives are at stake, prefer to hear the unvarnished truth from untainted sources who use their eyes to see and brains to figure things out they are not spoon-fed by spin-masters. I'm one of them. Another is my friend up north Devora Evgi. Below, her take on the border with Lebanon.

Their flag is still there... More bombs bursting in air? Hi Naomi,

It appears as though the Hizbollah is preparing for Round 2.

Up our way (Moshav Avivim), the entire border is now dotted with Hizbollah flags and moving figures. There is not a single Lebanese army flag in sight.

In my opinion, this is NOT okay. A flag is not only a symbol that represents concepts and ideals, but also used to stake claims. Does this mean that the Hizbollah have reclaimed Southern Lebanon? While driving home form work one evening, will I encounter terrorists who have infiltrated through tunnels they have dug under the border-underneath the noses of the UN base that lies opposite my house?

For years these UN troops have been observers. They observed the way the Hizbollah prepared for the last war and armed themselves to the teeth, so why should anything be different now? And BTW, where IS the Lebanese army that was supposed to keep the border clean? Perhaps it was largely comprised of Hizbollahs in disguise? Oops, sorry. If I don't keep quiet we'll never have peace with Syria...

Looks as though we can all stay tuned to the same channel and same program for a repeat broadcast of the last war, coming soon to a neighborhood near you...

Devora Evgi
Moshav Avivim

Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and journalist who lives in Jerusalem. She can be contacted at www.naomiragen.com, where you can subscribe to her newsletter.

To Go To Top

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS AREN'T ALWAYS NOBLE
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 13, 2007.

In his 01/09/2007 New York Times Op Ed piece entitled 'Don't Play With Maps' Dennis Ross, Middle East envoy under former U.S. President Bill Clinton, politely blasts former U. S. President Jimmy Carter for badly misrepresenting Middle East peace proposals advanced by President Clinton in the year 2000, within Carter's recent Israel skewering book 'Palestine Peace Not Apartheid'. No doubt, Carter's demonstrated anti-Israel bias, slanderously suggesting that Israel practices apartheid in the so-called West Bank, has profoundly damaged his reputation as an honest peace broker; witness for one the many consequential resignations of members of his Carter Center. More interestingly, however, than the deserved sullying of one former U.S. President and Nobel peace-prize winner, the latter 'honor' shared by the likes of Yasser Arafat, is the curious Israel loathing bond shared by the ignoble peace-prize winners Carter and Arafat inferred by Ross' article, indeed of a self serving nature upon closer inspection. He points out that Clinton's proposals "would have produced an independent Palestinian state with 100 per cent of Gaza, roughly 97 percent of the West Bank and an elevated train or highway to connect them." Furthermore, Arab east Jerusalem would have become the capital of that Palestinian state. Palestinian 'refugees' would have also had the right of return to their state, not Israel, and a $30 billion dollar fund would have been created to compensate any such refugees choosing not to exercise that right. Amazingly, or not so amazingly, Yasser Arafat, presumably representing his people, opted for intifada, embellished by the fanatic's weapon of choice homicide/suicide martyrdom, rather than the sweetest deal morphed Jordanian Arabs would ever get in their wildest dreams. Upon closer examination, we must note billionaire Arafat would have lost his whopping cut of a continuing flow of charitable euros to perceived poor displaced Palestinian waifs if 'Allah forbid' peace and a stable economy ever resulted from a materialized Palestinian state and the concept of Palestinian refugee thus disappeared. You think he wanted to kill that golden goose, especially with a high maintenance wife living in Paris!

Considering all this, how could Carter condemn Israel for abusing so-called Palestinians, when in fact their chosen leader so grossly misrepresented and in fact abused them, single handedly preventing them from achieving statehood, albeit at the expense of an exasperated charitable Israel willing to do anything for peace, security, and a sane existence? Hmmm! Could it be that this former U.S. President and peanut farmer is playing a shell game, attempting to con world opinion, for some little publicized reason? Indeed, a recent brilliant article written by Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, director of the American Center for Democracy, published on the Israel Hasbara Committee web site, does shed unfavorable light on this man, heretofore considered honorable and decent by so many others. Dr. Ehrenfeld asserts, "Between 1976-1977, the Carter family peanut business received a bailout in the form of a $4.6 million, 'poorly managed' and highly irregular loan from the National Bank of Georgia (NBG)." Sleazy connections are drawn to Bert Lance, NBG's chairman and later President Carter's director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, thanks to the tenacious detective work of legendary muckraker Jack Anderson. The journalist sleuth, per the article, noted that Mr. Carter was NBG's biggest borrower. In a nutshell, per Dr. Ehrenfeld, Lance's mismanagement of his bank got him into trouble, he contacted Agha Hasan Abedi, Pakistani shylock and founder of the bank "which could bribe God", the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), and was hired as a $100,00 per year consultant. Several steps later, a Saudi billionaire connected to the Saudi royal family got involved, Lance's 3.5 million dollar debt got paid off for the mere price of his soul and bank, and perhaps the Carter family's 'shady' loan was discretely 'renegotiated' and purified as a by-product of all these shenanigans. Let us observe even when a future U.S. president beds down with dogs, he'll surely wake up with fleas. Further questionable connections are drawn between Abedi, former President Carter, and his Carter Center 'coincidentally' made richer by generous Saudi and Gulf contributors, in Dr. Ehrenfeld's enlightening article.

The ever so relevant research piece further discusses how Carter's financial institution of choice BCCI, shut down in 1991, "assisted in spreading and strengthening the Islamic message"... "enabled Pakistan's Nuclear ambitions", helped further terrorist activities, and indirectly bought much influence in the West. The author also discusses Carter's least favorite lobby group opining, "AIPAC's (American-Israel Political action Committee) real fault was its failure to outdo the Saudi's purchases of the former president's loyalty", that notion bolstered by Carter's opinion in a recent Los Angeles Times interview, paraphrased by the author, that the "menacing" tactics of AIPAC rendered American policy makers helpless, and in fact were responsible for "U.S. bias against the destitute, depressed and (consequently) violent Palestinians...over the last 30 years." No doubt, as Dr. Ehrenfeld suggests, Carter is a true red, white, and blue Saudi loyalist, as supported by his June 1977 statement to the New York Times, "There has not been any nation in the world that has been more cooperative than Saudi Arabia." I am sure this erstwhile U.S. President was not then suggesting that The House of Saud was cooperating with Islamic fanatics by underwriting Jew/Israel/Infidel despising Wahhabi espousing madrassas a/k/a today's human bomb factories or bankrolling worldwide terrorist-in-training organizations, but then again it is easy to overlook 'minor' flaws from guys that are generous to you no matter how creepy they may be. Let us hope that all this clarifying information is communicated far and wide, exposes misconceptions concerning Israel and her supporters, and alas reveals the true nature of a heretofore admired former U.S. president, no matter how much the latter information may hurt.

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

THE YELLOW BADGE WORN BY JEWS WAS INVENTED BY MUSLIMS IN IRAQ IN 640
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 13, 2007.

Guess who Invented The Yellow Badge and Was First To Discriminate Jews?

The PBS documentary "Anti-Semitism in the 21st Century: The Resurgence," narrated by Judy Woodruff was aired on January 8th 2007. It did not however do a thorough job examining the roots of anti-Semitism and how and why it is flourishing today.

The film lacks the plight of the Jews who, for 2000 years, lived in Muslim countries. Those countries, to include Iraq, Egypt and Yemen, drove 800,000+ Jews out of their ancient communities, leaving behind, old tradition, property, and much to be proud about great achievements.

What is much more disturbing is the omission of the fact that the resurrected blood libels against Jews originates in the Islamic world! It was not originated by Nazi Germany or by Russia, rather Damascus, Syria (1840).

In 1913, seventy three years AFTER the Damascus affair, the Menahem Mendel Beilis blood libel trial took place in Russia.

This "documentary," as attractive as it might seem to be, is in line with Western Islamic apologists. It has systematically downplays anti-Semitism in the Muslim world, while it makes sure to mention Christianity being the sole origin of Jewish persecution.

Let remind the readers that the Yellow Badge Jews were forced to wear was in fact invented by Muslims in Iraq in 640: The idea of discrimination seems to have been derived from Islam, in which the dress of the Jews was distinguished by a different color from that of the true believer by which Jews were ordered to wear a yellow seam on their upper garments. The Nazis copied the Yellow Badge a thousand years later!

The cleansing of a country from Jews "concept" was initiated and accomplished in Arabia by Mohammad making Arabia Judenrein ("clean" of Jews) before the year 700, 500 years before the expulsion of Jews from France in year 1182 and from England in 1290.

Now we know who learned from whom anti-Semitism!

In brief, Anti-Semitism in the 21st Century: The Resurgence distorts history and at least in part, exculpating the Muslims. Additionally, it is most questionable whether this program should be promoted as "educational material" for our young generation to when Islam is targeting JEWS in any way and method possible. And it is not because they have learned Jewish hatred, persecution and anti-Semitism from the "nasty" Europeans, rather because Jew hating is intrinsic in Islam culture from its inception!

Contact Nurit Greenger by email at 4nurit@ca.rr.com Or go to her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

A TIME FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE: IT'S NOT NOW
Posted by Unity Coalition For Israel, January 12, 2007.

This was written by Clifford D. May and it appeared January 10, 2006 in National Review Online (www.NRO.com). It is archived at
www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/ in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=442147&attrib_id=7374 Clifford D. May is President of The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD).

Resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict would be a wonderful thing. But the reality is that for more than a half century, every American president has attempted to find a magic formula that would bring peace to the tiny territories between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. And every American president has seen his efforts come a cropper.

No one tried harder than Bill Clinton who, in the end, failed for this simple reason: Then-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat could not accept the idea of coexistence with Israel. And, to be fair, had Arafat made peace with the Jewish state, he almost certainly would have suffered the same fate as Anwar Sadat, the Egyptian president who reconciled with Israel and, soon after, was murdered by militant Islamists.

Almost five years ago, George Bush announced he would help establish a Palestinian state as quickly as possible. His one demand: It must not be a terrorist state. Subsequently, Palestinians chose Hamas, a terrorist organization, to lead them.

Despite this history, during meetings of the "expert" advisory group of the Baker/Hamilton Commission on Iraq, the Arab-Israeli conflict was a frequent topic of debate. Many of the retired diplomats, ex-CIA operatives and other assorted members of the Foreign Policy Establishment were adamant: Bush must do whatever it takes to persuade Israelis and Palestinians to settle their differences, once and for all. As a member of that advisory group, I would ask: Even were such efforts to succeed, by what wizardry would that impel Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites to stop killing each other over power and petroleum?

I received no adequate answer and the final Baker/Hamilton Iraq Study Group Report asserts: "The United States will not be able to achieve its goals in the Middle East unless the United States deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict." Until now has the United States been dealing indirectly with the conflict?

In a recent op-ed, former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft goes further, arguing that "a vigorously renewed effort to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict" could produce "real progress" which would cause Hezbollah and Hamas to "lose their rallying principle."

How would that work? What could Israel offer Hamas and Hezbollah to induce them to give up "their rallying principle" -- which is, unambiguously, the annihilation of Israel?

Or, if Israel ignored Hamas and Hezbollah, with whom would they make "real progress"?

Scowcroft does not explain. He merely adds that after making such progress, "Iraq would finally be seen by all as a key country that had to be set right in the pursuit of regional security." It would? By all? By Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, and al Qaeda? For heaven's sake, why?

It is unlikely that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will have answered such questions before setting off soon on a new round of Middle East diplomacy. If her intention is to demonstrate energetic engagement, fine. If the goal is to find common ground between Israelis and Palestinians, good luck.

It's hard to imagine where she would even look. In 2005, Israel withdrew from every inch of Gaza. In exchange, Israel has received no concessions, no benefits and no credit from the "international community." Virtually every day since, Gaza-based terrorists have fired rockets at Israeli villages. Based on this experience, Israeli enthusiasm for also withdrawing from the West Bank, the other "occupied territory," has faded.

As for Hamas, we must remember that its posture toward Israel is based not on political calculation but religious conviction. Hamas holds the Militant Islamist view that any land ever conquered by Muslims is an endowment from Allah. One can wage jihad for such holy ground, or one can shirk one's sacred obligation. There is no third option; it is not for man to negotiate away divine gifts.

In the long run, keep hope alive. But at this moment, given the current Palestinian leadership and the support it receives from Tehran, the chance of resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict is as low as it's ever been.

Why those who style themselves as foreign-policy "realists" claim otherwise is a mystery; as is their bizarre insistence that the road to peace in Iraq runs through Jerusalem. More plausibly, it is only when al Qaeda, the Iranian mullahs and other Militant Islamists are seen as having failed, that Palestinians will choose leaders who seek peace alongside Israel rather than the destruction of Israel.

Resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict would be a wonderful thing. But it's not happening anytime soon. And it cannot be a predicate for salvaging the vexing situation in Iraq.

The Unity Coalition for Israel (http://www.israelunitycoalition.org) is "the largest worldwide coalition of Jewish and Christian organizations, with more than 200 groups representing millions of people dedicated to Israel. Though we have many different backgrounds, we have one common goal: A Safe and Secure Israel."

"Israel is not just a Jewish issue. Millions of Christians resolutely endorse the principle of peace with security for the state of Israel. Because we work closely together and speak with a united voice, our message is being heard!"

To Go To Top

PALESTINIAN VICTIMHOOD, INC.: THE PALESTINIAN WRETCHEDNESS INDUSTRY
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 12, 2007.

This is an excellent article the entire world has to read and take the proper actions. This is about Palestinian Victimhood, Inc. Industry and Their Misery Myth

The Palestinians ONLY flourishing industry is wretchedness, misery, unhappiness, and victimhood!

Victimhood, Inc. is the corporation the Palestinians operate under. With the world allowing them a never-ending refugees' status, the Palestinians convinced the entire world they are the most disenfranchised and poorest people that ever lived on earth.

The connection between facts and -- on the street -- publicized propaganda is LESS THAN NOTHING.

The Palestinians, with their utmost audacity, had squandered and are squandering, with impunity, billions of dollars they did not work for and earn. Misery pays; it has turned into an industry!

If world leaders were half smart, any and all funds the Palestinians receive WILL BE stopped and then we shall see what they will do or not do!

This article was written by Ben-Dror Yemini, editor of the Ma'riv Op-ed page. It appeared in Hebrew in Ma'ariv January 5, 2007. It is the third article in the series. This is the English translation.

[Editor's note: A great deal of material on how the Palestinian terrorist organizations, particularly Hamas, funnel money into terrorism through their Da'wah ("charitable" societies) can be found at the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center Website, http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/engsite/home/default.asp]

AND THE WORLD PAYS: Despite the fact that the Palestinians are receiving aid at a scope that other countries can only dream of, they are still pitied, Thus the wretchedness has turned into an industry.

According to world opinion, the Palestinians are the most wretched people in the world. The most oppressed people on earth. This is a national group that incorporates a significant part of the image of the victim. Numerous publications deal with this wretchedness, with the poverty, with the refugee status that has continued for decades. Here, too, the connection between the facts and the publicity is less than nothing.

In the first article in the series, "And the World Remains Silent," which was published in the Rosh Hashana supplement, we dealt with the mass murder that Arabs and primarily Moslems perpetrate against Moslems and Arabs, compared with the relatively minimal number of Arabs killed in general, and Palestinians in particular, in the framework of the dispute with Israel.

The second article in the series, "And the World Lies," which was published in the Yom Kippur supplement, dealt with manipulation of the Palestinian refugee problem: even though almost 40 million people have experienced population exchanges for the purpose of creating states with a national, ethnic or religious identity, only the Palestinians of all the tens of millions, have remained refugees.

This article will examine the myth of Palestinian misery. The Palestinians are, indeed in a bad situation. No one disputes that. The question is whether this is a self-inflicted Palestinian product for which the Palestinians are responsible, or it is international harassment, primarily American or Israeli.

The myth, which is cultivated by the "forces of progress," says that, naturally, the United States is the root of all evil. Not only does it have an "unbalanced policy," it is also the oppressor of the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. And Israel, of course, is worsening the general oppression. Is that really so?

While the Palestinians have acquired a place of honor on the world's list of wretchedness, well oiled public-relations have turned them into a nation of victims. The facts are different in essence from the myths and the plethora of academic and journalistic publications that are perpetrating a mass fraud on world opinion.

Misery pays. It has turned into an industry. The world opens its pockets. The "great Satan," the country most hated by the Palestinians, the United States, which vies for precedence only with Israel, the "small Satan," is the country that has helped the Palestinians since the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993 more than any other country in the world. Not Saudi Arabia alone, and not the Gulf states, separately or together. Not the countries of Europe, who donate separately and not even the European Union.

They have been showered with dollars and they respond with criticism

These are the facts: according to a report by the World Bank, from 1994 to 1998, the United States was the largest contributor to the Palestinians. The figures are no different in the years after that, but the 1990s, which ended with the Intifada, are particularly important. It is true that Israel receives more aid. The military aid stems from strategic reasons and this is not the place to discuss them. Most of it, in any case, assists American industry, because Israel must spend the money only in America. With regards to the economic aid, in recent years it has become marginal and it is less than the aid given to the Palestinians.

In everything pertaining to per capita aid for the purposes of Palestinian development welfare, they receive far more aid than the aid given, for example, to Egypt. But the myth repeatedly claims that the Palestinians are the "victims," that they must be given more and more because that, perhaps, will convince them to want peace and to abandon terrorism.

According to the World Bank Report, in the abovementioned years, Washington contributed close to $345 million, compared with the European Union, which contributed $298 million. Japan is also at the top of the list, with a contribution of $306 million during those years.

The American contribution is actually much greater: during those years, just like during all the past few decades, the United States has been the largest contributor to UNRWA the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for refugees, which is assisting the Palestinians. UNRWA's annual budget was close to $300 million a year during that period. Out of that amount, $600 million were sent to the West Bank and Gaza.

Even by a multiyear calculation, from 1994 to 2004 the United States is in first place with $1.3 billion in aid. After the U.S. comes the European Union -- 1.11 billion, then Japan -- 0.5 3 billion. Here, too, these amounts do not include the contributions to UNRWA and the "Dawa" (the "charity"), which is used in large part to fund terrorism. We must remember that Hamas operated another, separate fund raising channel, some of which actually went to welfare, education, health and publicity infrastructures, and some of which went to strengthening the military arm and terrorists activities.

Billions have been given to the Palestinians. This money could have led to tremendous change in the Palestinian economy. This money, excuse the cliché, could have turned Gaza into Beirut (except that Hizbullah would turn Beirut into Gaza). But the Palestinians chose another path. The world rained dollars on them and the Palestinians responded with criticism. They were not the oppressed of the world, but rather the pampered of the world. Most of Africa's inhabitants, suffering a great deal more, can only dream of aid at the magnitude that was given to the Palestinians. There is poverty in the world. There is exploitation. There is oppression. But the Palestinians are not at the top of the list. They are far from that. They have never suffered from hunger. Their distress is mostly of their own devising.

They preferred the struggle to prosperity

Back before the Oslo Accords, money was flowing to the Palestinians. 1992 was a peak year for the Palestinian economy. The GDP per capita reached $1,999, and the actual GNP per capita was $2,683. The gap stems from supplements from foreign sources: some came from the UNRWA budget, some was transferred from Palestinians working abroad who sent money, and a significant part came from the work performed by many Palestinians in Israel.

Theoretically, if not for the terrorism, which forced Israel to impose closures and curfews, the Palestinian economy in the 1990s would have turned into one of the leading economies in the Middle East, after Israel. That is the point in time during which the secret talks were being held in Oslo, after which, following the signing of the Accords, the great flow of international aid to the Palestinians began. But these were also the years of large waves of terrorism. The Palestinians preferred the struggle to prosperity.

During those years, countries like Yemen, Chad and Nigeria, for example, had per capita GDPs of about $1,000 and they were not the poorest countries in the world. These were the years in which there were African communities of millions, in Congo, in Sudan, in the Sahara, which became refugees. But the international community abandoned them. The black people of Africa, of course, did not create terrorism and did not present a strategic threat. The moral conscience of the world in general and of the West in particular is activated in a very selective manner: by the television screen, by threats of terrorism, by the danger of a rise in oil prices. So the far greater suffering of tens of millions of black people in Africa is ranked much lower than the far lesser suffering of the Palestinians.

The distress of the Palestinians is apparently their most successful industry. This is distress that both perpetuates itself and serves as the basis for more and more payment demands. What is it for? Not for building infrastructures. Not for building an improved education system. Not for rehabilitating the hundreds of thousands who are living in refugee camps. The money went to three main objectives: perpetuating the political situation and the wretchedness; purchasing weapons and materiel for terrorism; and for corruption, by paying enormous amounts that went constantly into the pockets of cronies and hangers-on, such as the millions of dollars that went into the bank accounts of Yasser Arafat in banks around the world, and the coupons clipped by the heads of the Palestinian Authority from almost every economic development deal in the territories.

The supreme objective: Wiping Israel off the map

Israel is not innocent of mistakes, but all Israel's mistakes are dwarfed by the Palestinian liability. Living under an occupation is no great joy, and criticism of the occupation in general and of the settlements in particular, is legitimate. More than legitimate. We are not dealing with theory, however, but with facts: huge sums of money that were given to the Palestinians went down the drain. And the opportunities to win independence and prosperity were rejected in favor of the supreme objective: wiping Israel off the map.

The most important turning point was, of course, the Oslo Accords. The entire world volunteered to help the Palestinian Authority, which was established following the Accords. The Palestinian Authority did, indeed, grow and blossom. The big money began to flow. But the Palestinians themselves did not enjoy the fruits of the peace. To the contrary. They went into an economic decline.

Various research entities present contradictory data on the changes in the per capita GNP or the purchasing power of the Palestinians before and after the Oslo Accords. But even the contradictory data present consistent lines: on the one hand, there was an astonishing, unprecedented flow of funds to the Palestinian Authority, and on the hand, along with the enormous flow of funds, there was also a drop in per capita GNP. The explanation is simple: after the Oslo Accords, there were several waves of terrorism, which led to a series of closures. Fewer and fewer Palestinians worked in Israel.

But the change came. In 1997 there was a turning point and the Palestinian economy began to recover. The Palestinians began to feel the benefits of peace. According to Palestinian data, from 1994 to 2000 there was a real increase of 36% in the GDP. And yet, despite the dramatic improvement, the recovery was short-lived and it ended with the outbreak of the second intifada in September 2000. Again, the chance for prosperity was destroyed. Again, the Palestinians chose the path of violence.

This is an important point in time. The violence broke out precisely after Israel extended to the Palestinians the most generous offers it the history of the conflict between the two nations. The myths of "Palestinian suffering" and of the "horrors of occupation" are inconsistent with reality.

Far from last place in suffering and poverty

Firstly, the uprising began after two years of the waning of the terrorism and the rise of the economic prosperity. Secondly, these were the days in which the Palestinians had a Palestinian state in hand. It began at the Camp David summit, at which Ehud Barak, then Prime Minister, proposed something that no Israeli leader had dared to propose before him. It continued under the guidance of Bill Clinton and the essence was a Palestinian State at the 1967 borders with the exception of minor border adjustments of a few percent, including substantial parts of Jerusalem, and exchanges of territory, as compensation for the Palestinians.

And how did the Palestinians respond? This is how Bandar bin Sultan, the highly influential Saudi ambassador in Washington at that time, describes the events of that historic day, January 2, 2001: bin Sultan was sitting with Arafat at the Ritz Hotel before he went into the meeting with Clinton. Ben Sultan told Arafat that this was a historic opportunity, that he had the support of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and most of the Arab world, and that if he refused the proposal, "It would be a tragedy, it would be a crime." It did not help. Arafat went to Clinton and said: "No." Arafat did not want a Palestinian state. Arafat did not want prosperity. Arafat did not want an end to the occupation. Arafat wanted war.

Israel was forced to respond in order to protect itself from the enormous wave of terrorism. Yes, Israel made mistakes. But all of its mistakes are dwarfed, we must repeat, by the Palestinian intransigence against ending the occupation and the conflict, and the refusal to establish a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

We will continue with the facts. The flow of funds for economic aid, for human development, to prevent hunger, is supposed to be in accordance with the state of the needy community. Were the Palestinians the neediest community? Comparative data show that the Palestinians are far from last place in poverty. While the GNP was not at Western levels, even among the Muslim or Arab countries the Palestinians are not the last on the list.

The Human Development Index for 2003 places the "occupied Palestinian territories," as the Palestinian Authority is defined there, in the 102nd place out of 180 countries. Since 2003 represents one of the low points, at the height of the intifada, and since the GNP during the 1990s was far higher, we can assume that the Palestinians' ranking during the 1990s was higher. And in any case, even in the dire situation of 2003, the Palestinians were ahead of Algeria (ranked 103) Syria (ranked 106) Egypt (ranked 116), Morocco (ranked 126), Yemen (ranked 156) and certainly most of the countries in Africa and some of the countries of South America.

The Palestinians are ranked high in human development, relative to other Arab states, even though the GNP is lower than in those countries. And yet, a comparison of GNP and the international aide, relative to other countries and relative to the size of the population, yields an amazing result: the Palestinians received the greatest amount of aid in the world. Actually, it has been a decade and a half that the Palestinians have been far from being the poorest, but they received the most aide. The facts tell the story.

For example, from 1994 to 1998, the Palestinians in the territories received more than $2.6 billion in aid from the donor countries, and another $600 million through UNRWA, but that is only part of the picture. An enormous number of Palestinian NGOs received support from many funds, primarily in Europe.

Additionally, "charity organizations" sent money, mainly to entities that engaged in terrorism and/or religious activities. The money came from Muslims in America and Europe, from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. The cumulative amount each year comes to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Comparative data for 2003 shows an even more surprising picture. While the poverty-stricken Yemen received external aid of $30 per capita, each person in the Palestinian Authority received $470. Even in absolute terms, this is distorted. Egypt received external $1.286 billion in aid while the Palestinian Authority received $1.616 billion in aid. It is superfluous to say that the population of Egypt is 73 million and the Palestinians population is only 3 million.

This is not the end of the Palestinian audacity -- an audacity in which American support, both economic and political, is met with ingratitude. In 2003, among other things following the terrorist bombings, Washington decided to make its aid to NGOs around the world conditional on the signing of an agreement under which the recipient does not support terrorism. We should clarify that this was the policy vis-ŕ-vis every entity in the world and not just the Palestinians. However, some of the Palestinians did not like that. They wanted both money and support for terrorism. An internal debate developed, with the expected nationalistic rhetoric. The radical elements prevailed and at the beginning of June 2004, the Palestinian legislative Council passed a resolution rejecting the American conditions.

The Palestinians wanted both aid and the option that the aid would go to terrorist entities or to entities that support terrorism. Why? Because of the Palestinian "national honor," which includes supporting terrorism, was more important than the possibility of obtaining American aid.

Weapons are more important that welfare, education and prosperity

Three researchers -- Michael Keating, Anne Le More and Robert Lowe - edited a comprehensive book of articles on the aid, called "The Case of Palestine: Aid, Diplomacy and Facts on the Ground," which was published in 2005. The three will never be accused of being overly sympathetic to Israel. However, two clear facts emerge from the book: first, that the Palestinians have received the greatest amount of aid since World War II, not just in absolute terms, but also taking into account the adjustment for the various indices. And, in effect, relative to the number of inhabitants, the Palestinians have received more aid than the Marshall Plan, which was designed for the recovery of Europe after the Second World War. Second, in the words of the book, "Aid may have been part of the problem rather than the solution, and massive international aide has not prevented the decline of Palestinian society."

As usual with books of this type, it is also full of allegations against Israel, such as the claim that the aid contributed to perpetuating the occupation (how does that fit in with the Palestinian intransigence in refusing a Palestinian state and the Clinton initiative?), but if we relate solely to the data -- of the World Bank, of the International Monetary Fund, of research institutes -- they tell us the story.

Throughout the territories there are now tens of thousands of privately held weapons, which are not part of the weaponry of the Palestinian security forces. The price of a rifle, according to type and period, ranges between thousands of shekels and thousands of dollars. When we talk about Palestinian distress, it is also worth remembering Palestinian priorities, both national and private: weapons are more important than welfare, than education, than prosperity. The problem is not money. The problem is the preference for weapons.

If the Palestinians had been fighting the occupation -- they would have had an independent Palestinian state long ago, very close to the 1967 lines. But the Palestinians have made every effort to convince public opinion in Israel that the goal is not the end of the occupation. The Palestinian goal was and, for many, remains -- the end of the State of Israel. Fantasy has overcome reality.

Like the dream that has been nurtured about the right of return, which only increased the misery of those who have been forced to remain refugees, so the dream of the destruction of Israel has only increased the wretchedness of the Palestinians. The blame is not theirs alone. The blame also belongs to their propaganda agents in the West. The blame belongs to the propaganda agents who treated them like oppressed wretches and not like people with equality who are responsible for their actions. There is no other explanation for the fact that since the Oslo Accords, the Palestinians in the territories alone have received $5.5 billion, if we do not take into account additional sources that are not manifested in the official reports. This comes to about $1,300 per capita. Just for the sake of comparison, under the Marshall Plan, every European received only $273 (after adjustment for the index).

The Palestinians deserve to receive this aid. They have many good reasons. However we now see what happened to this vast amount of money. It was spent on corruption and the Fatah movement was removed from the government. It was spent on weapons at the encouragement of the central government and the result is social breakdown and anarchy. And above all, the blame belongs to those who helped in the flow of this enormous amount of money without making the Palestinians undergo a process of withdrawal from their futile dreams of the destruction of Israel. The result is mainly the continued destruction of Palestinian society.

Contact Nurit Greenger by email at 4nurit@ca.rr.com Or go to her website:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

THE "ARRANGEMENT"
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 12, 2007.

It is becoming more clear by the hour that the Bush Administration guided by Baker, Hamilton and Gates wishes Israel out of the way. But, it cannot be done in one fell swoop for political reasons so it must be done in increments. The following are merely my opinions based upon events as I have personally observed them unfold.

The Bush Administration wishes Israel to be forced to establish another Arab/Muslim Palestinian State -- future Global Terror aside. This is to be his one legacy for the history books, even if it parallels Neville Chamberlain's "Peace in Our Time" comment after meeting with Adolph Hitler. In my opinion, the Muslim code of ethics as specified in the Koran does not allow Muslims to negotiate peace agreements with America, Israel or even with each other for that matter.

To accomplish forcing Israel to abandon "YESHA" (Judea, Samaria and Gaza), the Jordan Valley, the Golan Heights and eastern Jerusalem, they must have Jews of the Left on their side. Recruiting Shimon Peres is already complete. PM Ehud Olmert and his Kadimites are "in the bag" as we say. Presently, an effort is underway to bring back Gen. (Ret.) Ehud Barak who was convinced during the Clinton Presidency into abandoning Lebanon and later in 2000 as Prime Minister offered Yassir Arafat more than 97%+ of all the areas previously mentioned for a second Arab Muslim Palestinian State, including all of the Gaza Strip.

In an article I released Monday January 8th "Cutting Off Arms", which spoke about what I observed as the secret addendum to the Baker, Hamilton and Gates Iraq plan which included the cut off of arms, spare parts and technology cooperation to Israel which now has been underway for several months. This is a major policy shift although an effort is being made by the Bush Administration and Olmert to downplay Washington's genuflecting to the demands of the Saudis.

Such Israelis as Olmert are under the impression they are part of the "arrangement" wherein Israel will not be allowed to suffer "too many" casualties due to the "silent" arms' embargo. That the Bush/Baker plan is to allow a certain amount of saturation missile damage to Israel before attempting to halt the attacks by Iran, Syria, Hezb'Allah and Hamas. This would be contingent on Olmert and collaborators giving up what Barak offered to Arafat. (Note! Please recall that it was Rabin Peres who planned the process in the early 1980s which moved forward into the Madrid Conference and that tuned into the Oslo Accords.)

MERGING OF INTERESTS

None of this started recently:

1. We know that the U.S. State Department, prior to 1948, did everything in its power to stop the U.N. vote on partitioning the Land of Israel and continued as Israel's pro-Arab/anti-Israel adversary. The hostility reflected politics, oil and the more personal dislike of Jews and the Jewish State.

2. Skipping forward, we observed PM Yitzhak Shamir lured into the Madrid Conference in

November 1991 with U.S. State Department James Baker III through what became known as his Jew Boys Dennis Ross, Aaron Miller and Dan Kurtzer guiding all actions of the State Department against Israel as mandated by the Secretary of State, James Baker III. Remember? James Baker said "F... the Jews; they didn't vote for us anyway."

That Madrid conference carried the seeds of Oslo ending with Egypt, prompted by the U.S. State Department demanding that the Middle East be made a nuclear free zone, meaning Israel was intended to give up her unstated nuclear deterrence. That demand has been repeated thereby making Israel extremely vulnerable if accepted as a policy by Israel's weak government. If, by chance, PM Olmert meets a similar fate as Sharon, his deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres as his last gesture (as his last gesture) could be to disarm Israel's alleged nuclear deterrence.

3. Rabin, Peres and Beilin collaborated in Norway with the State Department, who hovering in the background to create the secret Oslo Accords which parallel's Ehud Barak's offer to Yassir Arafat of giving up 97%+ of the territories to Arafat. Keep in mind, the State Department was paying Arafat Billions of American tax-payers' dollars, not to forget funding Saeb Erekat, Faisel Husseini and Hanan Ashwari who made frequent visits for coaching and training at the American CIA headquarters at Langley. Presumably, they were to be America's representatives in the Arafat camp.

4. Notice the convergence of interests and goals as Olmert virtually duplicates Ehud Barak's goals of abandoning Israel's Land, first to Arafat and then to his 40 year partner, aid and money man, Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen). At various times some or all of the following have been put on the table by the U.S. State Department to be negotiated away including Judea and Samaria, the Jordan Valley (Israel's eastern defense border), Eastern Jerusalem (with all the Jewish holy sites and protector of all Jerusalem), the Golan Heights and Mt. Dov on the Golan (which is an excellent observation site to watch Syria plus the Shebaa "farms" which protect Mt. Hermon -- the key observation point to prevent Syria from starting another war). The Golan is to be America's gift to Syria for a short-term concession of assisting America in fighting the "Insurgents" (read: Terrorists) in Iraq.

The convergence is that Israel's Leftists parallel the Arabist U.S. State Department which has always planned to shrink Israel which would aid the establishment of a Global Terrorist State run by the Arab Muslim Palestinians and other Terror groups. This, of course, will be denied by State, no doubt protesting that it is neither their intent nor is it likely to happen.

Olmert has already announced that he finds the Saudi King Abdullah's past offer "interesting" wherein the Saudis will recognize Israel AFTER she retreats to her 1948 Armistice Lines. Remember that these lines called "Auschwitz" borders by Abba Eban were what invited Egypt and Syria to threaten to push Israel into the Sea, initiating the 1967 Six Days' War.

To further this idea, Yuli Tamir, current Minister of Education, is working to put the 1967 so-called "Green Line" borders into the children's school curriculum as if it were Israel's established border. Clearly, this has the imprimatur of Ehud Olmert as it is one more fact on the ground that supports his plan to re-partition Israel, de-legitimizing any Jewish town, settlement, kibbutz East of the Green Line will then be anchored in textbooks.

5. The pro-Arab/Arabist State Department representing America's oil interests in the Oval Office still need a "back channel" to coordinate such secret manipulations as Oslo, Barak's offer to Arafat, Olmert's parallel divestment goals, etc. Some will recall a Member of Knesset demanding an investigation of those who collaborating (both local and foreign) in arranging the failed Oslo Accords. Shimon Peres went ballistic and threatened to quit PM Ariel Sharon's coalition government at which point Sharon quashed any further efforts of investigating Peres, Beilin and the European connections or any overview by the State Department.

Later, of course, we observed Sharon, in collusion with Olmert and other advisors start to fulfill Barak's offer to Arafat to abandon the territories, starting with Gush Katif/Gaza. This Olmert supported, despite advice from Israel's Military command and her Intelligence Agencies that Gaza would become a Global Terrorist Base of Operations for Arab Muslim Palestinians, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Hezb'Allah and other Terrorist groups based or supported in Iran and Syria. ALL of this has, of course, happened.

Gaza is now a terrorist base with the terrorist groups fighting each other much as they did in Beirut, Lebanon when Arafat established a mini-Terrorist State in Lebanon after King Hussein in Jordan drove him and his armed men out. Arafat ran a 12 year Civil War in Lebanon wherein 100,000 Muslims and Christians were killed.

6. Israelis are too easy to trick because they believe what they are told or promised by Arabist interests in Washington. While America has, indeed, been exceedingly generous to Israel, they do have equal (more than equal) loyalty to Saudi Arabia. This includes America's reliance on oil, sales of aircraft, missiles, armor and other technology to the Saudis. People like George Herbert Walker Bush, James Baker III, Casper Weinberger (now dead), the State Department, etc. always resented Israel and worked diligently with Israel's enemies.

Did you know that James Baker's law firm (Baker, Boggs) represents Saudi Arabia?

7. What naive Israeli politicians and political Leftists do not understand is that they have been recruited, based upon the fiction that they and the Arabist State Department and the multi-national oil industry have the same agenda. They do parallel only so far but, at the end, Israel is supposed to be merely a red stain on the sands of the Middle East. That's called betrayal!

Here again, I remind the reader that the American people like and admire the small nation of Israel which often explains why the Administration and State does not attack Israel frontally. The problem is that the American people do not run the country of America. Here one finds a mafia-like conglomerate of multi-national oil companies, banks with deep interests in Middle East cash flow and the arms industry where names like Bechtel, Haliburton and the Carlyle Group are prominent.

CUTTING OFF ARMS SUPPLY TO ISRAEL WHILE FUNDING TERRORISTS WHO KILL AMERICANS

Therefore, cutting off re-supply of ammunition, air-to-ground missiles, spare parts, technology preceding the expected war as early as this spring is planned -- with malice aforethought. There may be a U.S. strike by missiles on Iran's nuclear facilities with Iran launching missiles at Israel. After this blow to both the facilities and the vaunted pride of Islamists, the U.S. under President Bush may want to calm down the Arab world with a gift of appeasement. That gift, if Baker and Gates have their way, will sadly be the Jewish State of Israel assuming they volunteer to be the sacrifice.

As this is written, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is on her way to Israel where, undoubtedly, she will repeat her screaming act of the past -- arm twisting while demanding that Israel show support for Abu Mazen. This is clearly her mission. No doubt, the American cut-off of arms and technology will be offered up as a bribe/sacrifice IF Olmert gives up more Land and allows the shipment of automatic weapons to Abu Mazen's Force 17.

Remember how in Khartoum (on March 12, 1973) one of the leaders of Force 17 led the Terror Organization Black September when they kidnapped and murdered the American Ambassador Cleo Noél, his attaché George Curtis Moore and the Belgian diplomat Guy Eid. The orders by Yassir Arafat to execute them were secretly recorded. This tape was given to the U.S. State Department who kept it secret for 23 years. It was just released under the Freedom of Information Act. Despite this proof of Arafat ordering the execution of Americans, the State Department continued to fund him and his various Terror organizations.

I have tried to highlight a few of the confusing events leading up to a potential attack on Israel. Only the American people, possibly Congress, pro-Israel Christians, some Jewish organizations (usually too fearful of speaking out) can stop the Bush-Baker doctrine and this "ARRANGEMENT".

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

RALLY MARKS ANNIVERSARY OF FIRST FATAH TERROR ATTACK
Posted by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz, January 12, 2007.

At a rally marking 42 years since Fatah's first terrorist attack on Israel, Abbas said it's legitimate to shoot at Israelis, but not at each other. Arab MK Ahmed Tibi also addressed the crowd.

The large rally, held on the grounds of the Mukata headquarters of the Palestinian Authority, was attended by thousands of supporters. In addition to an anniversary event, the rally was seen as a Fatah show of strength in the battle with Hamas for public support in the PA.

Accompanied by leading members of the Fatah terror group, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas addressed the crowd. After placing flowers on the grave of arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat, Abbas said, "We have turned guns on the occupation, and that is our legitimate right -- but to turn the guns on each other is forbidden."

Abbas condemned Israel for its recent counter-terrorist operations in Ramallah and Gaza. He also was careful to call upon all the PA factions and militias to adhere to what he characterized as "the laws of Islam" and avoid killing innocent individuals.

Saying that internecine violence in Gaza served no one's interests, Abbas called on Fatah faction members to refrain even from insulting the Hamas terrorist group. The two terror groups have been battling in the streets of Gaza for control of the PA government since Hamas was elected to the leadership a year ago, with a sharp increase in violence in recent weeks.

The PA leader also indicated his opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state with interim borders, as called for by the Road Map to Peace promoted by the Quartet -- the US, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations. An interim PA state is phase two in the Road Map's three-phase plan for a final settlement of the Arab-Israel conflict.

Also addressing the Fatah anniversary rally in Ramallah was Israeli-Arab Knesset Member Ahmed Tibi (Ra'am-Ta'al). Tibi called upon all PA factions to unite, and said the struggle would continue until the conquest of Jerusalem by the Arabs.

"The Palestinian struggle will continue until the liberation of all the Palestinian lands and the establishment of a Palestinian state on all the lands occupied in 1967 -- chief among them, holy Jerusalem!" MK Tibi declared.

Though Fatah was founded in the late 1950s, the Ramallah rally was held to mark the first terrorist attack carried out against Israel by the organization, on January 1, 1965. The intended target was Israel's national water supply system, but the bombing was prevented by Israeli security officers.

This appeared in Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com) today.

To Go To Top

FROM ISRAEL: A CALL TO ACTION
Posted by Arlene Kushner, January 11, 2007.

Recently, when describing what the US would be expecting in the way of concessions from Israel, I said it would soon be time to call upon all US-connected supporters of Israel who read my material to protest.

THE TIME IS NOW.

Sec. of State Condoleezza Rice is due here early next week. Word is (there are slightly different versions, but the essence is clear) that she is coming to promote formation of a Palestinian State. Remember how she spoke about the window of opportunity? I joked that she was in an alternate universe. She is indeed in an alternate universe, but what she would like to do is no joke.

She reportedly thinks that while the Palestinians most decidedly don't have their act together, once there are negotiations and it's clear what they will receive, they will concentrate on getting their act together: it will motivate them. It is unmitigated nonsense. Why? Because their goal is not acquisition of a state living next to Israel in peace, their goal is destruction of Israel.

While this would ostensibly be done via the Road Map, Rice wants to skip over the first part of that plan, which calls for Palestinian efforts to dismantle terrorist infrastructure, and jump right to the part that discusses formation of a state. It would be nothing short of a disaster for Israel. For it would mean formation of a terrorist state at Israel's borders.

The person who must be reached is President Bush.

I urge and implore each and every one of you to communicate with the president. This is the role you can play to make a difference. You are not powerless if you will put your caring into action.

You must write as an American citizen.

Contact the president yourself, and also forward this to everyone else you can think of who also cares.

Help the network grow! Numbers are crucial. We want a grassroots groundswell: hundreds, or better, thousands, of communications. Pass this message to organizational/synagogue/church lists and to various blogs and websites.

Letters are the most effective means of delivering your message. Either by snail mail or by fax. If you cannot do this, place a phone call. Least effective, but better than no message, is one by e-mail.

TIME IS CRITICAL.

Your messages go to:

President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500
Fax: 202-456-2461
White House Comment line: 202-456-1111
TTY/TDD Comment line: 202-456-6213.
e-mail: comments@whitehouse.gov

Using your own words...
Explain that a Palestinian state would be a terrorist entity and a major threat to Israel.

Speaking as a strong supporter of Israel, appeal to the president to protect Israel by refusing to permit that state to be established now. Tell the president that you know he understands and that you count on him to do the right thing here.

The US hope is that a "moderate" Fatah can be strengthened and will take charge. Following are points that totally refute this:

[] Vast amounts of weaponry have been smuggled into Gaza with the intention of attacking Israel. Fatah is among the groups involved in this. There is clear documentation that Al Aqsa Brigades (which is involved even in such things as building bunkers in Gaza for rockets) is a branch of Fatah.

[] There is extensive evidence to connect Fatah and and its leader Mahmoud Abbas with terrorism. They are NOT moderates. The Fatah charter calls for Israel's destruction. The plan is to do it in stages -- taking what is possible in order to gain more.

Mahmoud Abbas himself has documented terrorist connections. He encouraged Hamas participation in the PA from the beginning of his presidency.

Just months ago, Abbas signed the Prisoner's Document, with Hamas. It: sanctions terrorism even inside of Israel proper, calls for the "right of return" and fails to recognize Israel's right to exist.

Serious political thinkers/journalists in Israel are convinced that Abbas is not powerless, but rather that he does not defeat Hamas because he does not want to.

See report for details on this:
http://www.emetonline.org/ModerateFatah%20_US.pdf
(You may want to include this link in your message.) [] A recently released 33 year old State Dept. cable makes it clear that the State Department has been covering for Fatah, which was involved in the murder of two American diplomats. That policy of whitewashing Fatah must change now. See the article by Caroline Glick exposing this at:
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467639999&pagename= JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

I am available to anyone who wants further documentation or clarification.

Arlene

Contact Arlene Kushner at akushner@netvision.net.il or go to her website: www.ArlenefromIsrael.info

To Go To Top

ISRAEL'S SOLIDARITY WITH AL-QAEDA LEFT; THE WAR WITHIN THE WEST
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 11, 2007.
1. The Israeli committee for solidarity with al-Qaeda now exists, or at least that is what it should be called. On Jan. 11, Haaretz ran a guest Op-Ed by Amnon Vidan, the Director of the Israeli branch of the rabidly anti-Israel pro-terror organization Amnsety International. The entire Op-Ed was an attack on the US for operating the Gitmo Bay camp in which al-Qaeda terrorists are held. The Amnest chap wants the US to shut down Guantanamo Bay. After all, the terrorists there did not get nice trials with nice lawyers. Really, that is what he says. In general, Herr Vidan is far more concerned with the "human rights" of al-Qaeda terrorists than he is with those of the 911 victims. He cries at night for the al-Qaeda victims of a criminal America. (His piece in Hebrew is at http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/812065.html) Here's my proposal. Let's ship all Amnesty International directors to Gitmo to share cells with the terrorhoids there and collect some first-hand information.

Meanwhile, here is Robert Pollack on what conditions at Gitmo are REALLY like, from the Wall St Journal:
January 12, 2007
"The Gitmo High Life"
By Robert L. Pollock
January 12, 2007; Page A12
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116857309913174829.html
Mr. Pollock is a member of The Wall Street Journal's editorial board.

For sheer irony it's hard to beat this week's spectacle of Cindy Sheehan protesting the U.S. detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay -- from inside the prison that is Cuba itself. It's not uncommon for asylum-seeking Cubans to brave minefields and shark-infested waters to enter the U.S. naval base, which five years ago this week also became home to many top figures from al Qaeda and the Taliban.

That anniversary has brought forth predictable demands that Guantanamo be closed from the self-styled human rights activists at Amnesty International and other groups. But the world needs a place to hold al Qaeda terrorists, who continue to strike in Europe, Iraq and Afghanistan -- even if they have failed to hit the United States since 2001. And after visiting Guantanamo just before Christmas, it was easy to understand why Belgian Police official Alain Grignard (who came last year with a delegation from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) was moved to declare it "a model prison, where people are better treated than in Belgian prisons."

This is no less true of Camp Five, Gitmo's maximum security facility that houses its most dangerous detainees. Modern and clean, it looks just like a U.S. jail. Meals (I ate the same lunch the detainees did that day) are high in caloric content, if not exactly gourmet. The average detainee has gained 18 pounds. And in the interrogation room it's the Americans who may have to suffer long hours in straight-back chairs, while the detainees -- I kid you not -- get a La-Z-Boy. I was shown a Syrian under interrogation via closed circuit television. His questioners were two pleasant-looking young women. He was smiling.

I'm not under the impression that these sessions are always fun and games. But detainees in Defense Department custody are treated according to the restrictive rules of the Army Field Manual, which bans all forms of coercive interrogation. I double checked with the camp's lead interrogator: other government agencies -- read CIA and FBI -- have to follow those rules too. Not only does that mean no "torture" is going on. Your average good-cop bad-cop routine isn't allowed. Cooperative detainees get rewards like movies. "Harry Potter" is one of their favorites.

When it comes to medical care, almost no expense is spared -- as I discovered after spotting an overweight man lounging in the rec yard of Camp Five. "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?" I inquired (he was some distance away). "No, that's Paracha," came the somewhat exasperated reply.

Saifullah Paracha is a Pakistani businessman and media owner who claims two meetings with Osama bin Laden were purely for journalistic interest. He is believed to be an important figure in the case against Majid Khan, one of the 14 "high value" detainees recently transferred to Gitmo from CIA custody. Last year Mr. Paracha's son Uzair was sentenced to 30 years in a U.S. prison for aiding an al Qaeda operative in a plot to bomb U.S. targets.

Maybe terrorism is stressful work. But whatever the reason, the elder Paracha also suffers from heart disease. So late last year -- at an expense of some $400,000 -- the U.S. government flew down doctors and equipment to perform cardiac catheterization. Mr. Paracha's response was to refuse treatment and file a petition in U.S. federal court for transfer to a hospital in the U.S. or Pakistan. At least his lawyers were frank about their cynical motives: "His death in U.S. captivity would be a blow to American prestige."

The medical care at Guantanamo seems state of the art. All detainees over 50 are offered colonoscopies; at least 16 have been performed. Gitmo's psychiatrist told me that fewer that 1% of detainees suffer from mood disorders, a rate lower than that of the general population. That would appear to undercut claims that indefinite detention is itself a form of "mental torture."

Guantanamo detainees don't lack for legal representation. A list of lead counsel released this week in response to a Freedom of Information Act request reads like a who's who of America's most prestigious law firms: Shearman and Sterling; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr; Covington & Burling; Hunton & Williams; Sullivan & Cromwell; Debevoise & Plimpton; Cleary Gottlieb; and Blank Rome are among the marquee names.

A senior U.S. official I spoke to speculates that this information might cause something of scandal, since so much of the pro bono work being done to tilt the playing field in favor of al Qaeda appears to be subsidized by legal fees from the Fortune 500. "Corporate CEOs seeing this should ask firms to choose between lucrative retainers and representing terrorists" who deliberately target the U.S. economy, he opined.

None of the above is meant to suggest Guantanamo is a fun place. What terrorist detention facility would be? (Base commander Adm. Harry Harris rejects the term "prison," by the way: "We are not about punishment; we are about keeping enemy combatants off the battlefield.") But the picture of Guantanamo usually painted by the press and human-rights activists is a terribly distorted one. Americans should rest assured that the men held there are probably getting better treatment than they deserve. 2."The war within the west" by Melanie Phillips January 10, 2007 http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/ article URL: http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1431

The Wall Street Journal has a deserved reputation for intelligent, well-informed opinion. So why has it suddenly published a piece of unadulterated trash? An article it has published by an Israeli academic, Fania Oz-Salzberger, is as ignorant as it is offensive. She claims that European voices speaking up for Israel base their support on hatred of Muslims.

Last September the European Coalition for Israel convened in Brussels, its most prominent speakers lamenting the loss of European Jewry alongside the rise of European Islam. The tone was belligerent, the linkage crude: 'The enemies of Israel are also a threat to Europe,' delegates were told. And also: 'In only two generations, most parts of Europe will be under Islamic law.' Other self-declared friends grimly speak of Londonistan and augur the coming of the European Caliphate. Such statements may reflect genuine concern, but are disconcerting when made on European soil.

Unlike the late Oriana Fallaci, whose commitment to the Jews stemmed from her heroic anti-Fascist youth, and whose harsh critique of Islam came from an enraged liberal soul, many of these new friends are Muslim-bashers first and Israel-backers second. Their blanket condemnation of Muslim communities on their continent rings eerily familiar. Their sweeping verdict against a whole civilization has that strange déjŕ vu feel. And their rather sudden nostalgia for Europe's lost Jews is, I'm sorry to say, far too late and somewhat suspect. As the Mishna wisely warns, 'Any love that depends upon some thing, when that thing is no more, the love is no more.' You see, we have a very long experience with human relationships.

I, for one Israeli, would be grateful to my newfound buddies if their sympathy for me did not rely on the trashing of another religion. Unlike them, I'm touched by the sight of young Muslim women in European university campuses. They remind my of my own grandmother, a student in Prague who had to flee after the Nazi rise to power, and of all the other young and hopeful Jews whose dreams and lives were shattered by the European culture they so admired. I will therefore not solicit support based on unqualified dislike of other human groups, least of all on the continent that kicked out my grandparents.

Since (as far as I know) I am the sole author of a book entitled Londonistan, these odious remarks leapt from the page. I reject absolutely the charge that the defence of Israel is based on a hatred of Muslims. On the contrary, the defence of Israel involves fighting Muslim hatred of Israel and the Jews. In my book, I explicitly draw a distinction between Islam and Islamism, precisely in order not to demonise those Muslims who are genuinely committed against the ideology of hatred and conquest that is driving the jihad. But the fact is that there are many Muslims in Europe who are either jihadis themselves or who are consumed by hatred of Jews, Israel, America and the west.

Disgracefully, Oz-Salzberger implies that those Europeans who are warning about the jihad in their midst are the potential instigators of a second European holocaust, this time against the Muslims. What pathological inversion is this? The only holocaust presently on the horizon is the one being planned by Muslims for the country of which Oz-Salzberger is a citizen. Islamists declare openly that they want to destroy not merely Israel but western civilisation, and subject Europe and the free world to Islam. Vilifying as 'Islamophobes' those who are warning of the advances that this movement has already made and is continuing to make in Europe is to vilify those who are warning against murderous tyranny, religious conquest and genocide -- and therefore effectively to take the side of those who support murderous tyranny, religious conquest and genocide.

Her comparison of Jewish refugees from the Nazi Holocaust and young Muslim women is particularly offensive. Certainly, many Muslims are perfectly decent and honourable. But an awful lot are not. In Britain, opinion polls of Muslims have shown that nearly half think 9/11 was a conspiracy between the US and Israel, 46% think the Jewish community is 'in league with the Freemasons to control the media and police' and 37% think the Jewish community in Britain is a legitimate target 'as part of the ongoing struggle for justice in the Middle East'. To equate such a community with Jewish refugees like Oz-Salzberger's grandmother, none of whom, it goes without saying, harboured any such vicious prejudice towards the people amongst whom they had come to live, is beyond grotesque. Those Jewish refugees were the victims of murderous ethnic hatred; an alarming number of European Muslims perpetrate precisely such hatred. Such an equation reveals a level of moral, intellectual and political blindness which desecrates the memory of the six million who perished -- and certainly denies the present suffering of European Jews such as those in France who are being attacked and murdered by French Muslims. In such circumstances, to say that those who support Jews against Muslim hatred are guilty of 'unqualified dislike of other human groups' is as incomprehensible as it is disgusting. For it to be said, furthermore, by an Israeli Jew, using the Holocaust to defame those who seek to defend against a second such catastrophe the country that arose from its ashes, is a Jewish cultural tragedy.

Oz-Salzberger goes on:

It may be our role to remind today's Europeans of the medieval past, the great centuries when Islam was young, tolerant to minorities and philosophically minded. There would be no Maimonides, no glorious Sephardi Jewish tradition, without the Arab world. Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may be threatening the existence of Israel today, but no Muslim power has ever dealt the Jews such calamities as brought upon them by Europe.

Dear oh dear. 'Tolerant to minorities'? The idea that medieval Islam was a kind of forerunner to John Locke is one of the ludicrous myths peddled by the legion of third-rate revisionist historians of Islam who have sanitised its history. Yes, it's true that medieval Islamic rule did not inflict upon the Jews horrors as great as those inflicted by medieval Christendom. Unlike the Christians, the Muslims didn't slaughter all the Jews unless they converted; it only slaughtered some of them in periodic pogroms. The 'golden age' of Sephardi Jewry was a brief and atypical affair. Even then, the Jews in Muslim lands were forced to live as 'dhimmi' or second class citizens: made to pay special taxes, to live under a host of humiliating restrictions and to wear clothes designed to single them out as a lowly caste.

Oz-Salzberger, let us remind ourselves, is the director of the Posen Research Forum for Political Thought and senior lecturer at the faculty of law and school of history at the University of Haifa. How can any university employ such a person? She is a disgrace to academia.

Unfortunately, there are many like her throughout the Israeli intelligentsia. As in Britain and Europe -- maybe even more so -- there tends to be a knee-jerk vilification by many Israeli intellectuals of everyone who does not subscribe to left-wing utopian idiocy, and as a result is written off as racist, bigoted, Islamophobic and above all 'right-wing. In the Jerusalem Post, Caroline Glick points out that the European Coalition for Israel, which is defamed by Oz-Salzberger as 'Islamophobic', in fact issued no diatribes against Islam at its conference; she suggests that the reason for this attack on the ECI is simply that it is Christian. That may be so. But the unhappy fact is that the proclivity for moral and intellectual inversion, national self-loathing and consequent cultural suicide which are the hallmark of the British and European elites is prevalent in such circles in Israel too. It's dangerous enough in Europe; in Israel, beseiged by its destroyers and fighting for its survival, it is treachery.

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com.

To Go To Top

THE DESECRATED HOLY JEWISH COMMUNITY OF NINEVEH, NOW MOSUL
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 12, 2007.

It's the same tired story of the stinking Muslims screaming like rotten children at any and every perceived affront to their awful, merciless religion, but they don't give a damn about desecrating any other religion. In fact, they seem to take perverse pleasure in being destructive of anything holy other than Islamic. Such is the nature of Islam. Shameful swines!

It was "the house where the Jews prayed...it was a Jewish school for children," the curious Iraqi people told the Jewish Chaplain Rabbi Hubert, from the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airmobile Division, who stumbled on Jewish history while serving in Iraq. How sad it is what happened to thousands of years of Iraqi Jewish history, the Muslims made sure to desecrate, destroy and make rubble.

May the memories of the holy Jewish community of Nineveh, now Mosul shall never be forgotten.

Jewish Chaplain Rabbi Hubert from the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airmobile Division provides some very interesting insights about the U.S. mission in Iraq.

Climbing over the rotting garbage, I realized I was the first Jew to enter this holy place in over 50 years. I am writing to you from Nineveh, the city of the prophet Jonah. Its present name is Mosul. I have had the privilege of seeing its ancient walls, of touching its stones, of going to the grave. Islamic tradition believes is the prophet Jonah. There is a mosque at the site; but hundreds of years ago, the Iraqis we work with tell me, it was a synagogue. They tell me the reason the site is so sacred is because of the sacredness in which the Jews held it. Presently, there are no signs of this ancient synagogue.

I am the rabbi of the 101st Airborne Division, the division Steven Spielberg immortalized in his epic "Band of Brothers." We, the soldiers of the 101st Airborne, fought our way up from the south, from Kuwait. The battle took us past Ur, the city where Abraham was born. We maintained contact with the enemy, passed the site of the great Talmudic academies of Sura and Pumpaditya, to the city of Babylon, where the prophet Daniel was taken. There we engaged the Nebuchadnezzar Iraqi Armored Division and beat them. We continued the battle to Baghdad, where so many Jews lived and were massacred in the summer of 1948. It was the city of so many of our sages, including the Ben Ish Chai.

Now we are in Mosul. I ask about the Jews who lived here, and very few remember them. Many say Jews never lived here, but my heart tells me different. The old ones tell me there was a Jewish quarter, a synagogue, study halls, and a cemetery.

One day, while searching the streets of the ancient city, I came across a building missing half of its roof. The site was a garbage dump and the building's interior was three-quarters full of rotting garbage, faeces and sewage. I had to crouch down low to get inside as the doorway was almost completely buried. As I entered light came through the half-open roof and I could just make out writing engraved on the walls. It was Hebrew. It was then that I knew had stumbled into the ancient synagogue of the city of Mosul-Nineveh. My heart broke as I climbed over the garbage piles that filled the room where, for hundreds of years, the prayers of Jews had reached the heavens.

I realized I was probably the first Jew to enter this holy place in over 50 years. Over three-and-a half meters of garbage filled the main sanctuary and what appeared to be the women's section. I could barely make it out because of the filth, but there was Hebrew writing on the walls.

Many Iraqis congregated around me, wanting to know what I was doing. My translator said that the American army was interested in old archaeological sites of all kinds. I asked them if they knew what this place was, and they all said in an instant: It was the house where the Jews prayed.

They told me that the houses in the streets surrounding the synagogue had been filled with Jews. They took me to the children's yeshiva, a marbled edifice that no longer had a roof, only walls and half-rooms. There was a vagrant family living there and when I asked them what this place was, they said it was a Jewish school for children.

As I walked through the quarter I was shown the grave of the prophet Daniel, once a synagogue. I saw that many of the doorposts had an engraving of the Lion of Judah on the top. I felt the presence of our people, of their daily lives as merchants, teachers, rabbis, doctors, and tailors.

Tears came to my eyes, but I had to hold them back lest I put the soldier with me and myself in a dangerous situation. I had to pretend that I was only mildly interested in what they were showing me.

I have no answers. I only have great sadness, pain, and loneliness. Since then I have gone back to the Jewish quarter of old Mosul with members of my congregation, Jewish soldiers of the 101st: infantrymen, artillerymen, medics, pilots, lawyers, doctors, all proud to be Jewish and serving their country. Together we have found five more synagogues, more yeshivot and many Jewish homes. They have all come away profoundly affected by what they saw. They are saddened, but yet proud to be connected to such an ancient and rich tradition in this historic city of Nineveh.

I searched the ancient city near other cemeteries in hope of finding the Jewish cemetery. I found a Christian cemetery and a British War cemetery situated next to each other. The British War cemetery is now used as a soccer field. The cemetery was marked as a war memorial cemetery and the dates were for World War I and World War II. There was a marker in the cemetery written in English and Sanskrit, dedicated to the Hindu and Sikh soldiers of Her Majesty's Army who died while serving. Another one, written in English and Arabic, was dedicated to the Muhammadan soldiers in Her Majesty's Army who died while serving, and a third marker had nothing on it. These markers were over seven meters high. The third marker could have had a dedication, but if so it had been destroyed or removed. Scattered all through the cemetery were fragments of tombstones, some with a few words of English, some with a cross on them. Outside these three markers there were no standing tombstones anywhere, only broken fragments scattered in corners. A 1.5-meter wall and an entrance gate surrounded the cemetery. About half a meter inside the cemetery, barely showing through the surface, was a fragment my assistant, Specialist William Rodriguez, discovered. By working with me over these last few months he has learned to recognize Hebrew letters. As we dug it out we noticed it had both Hebrew and English on it. I was so excited to see it, yet so sad. There are many possible explanations, but the one I think most plausible is that it was the grave marker of a British soldier, a young man by the name of Zev. The British Army had contacted the local Jewish community to have a stone engraver put Hebrew on the stone along with the English. It was their way of honouring and respecting their fallen comrade.

If this explanation is true then this cemetery contains those of the Hindu, Sikh, Islamic, Christian, and Jewish faiths, all soldiers who died in the service of their country. The obvious question: Is death the only way these great faiths can coexist in peace? We would hope not. I have not yet discovered the ancient Jewish cemetery of the Jews of Mosul-Nineveh. My instincts tell me it is nearby, but in the last 60 years it has probably been desecrated and obliterated. One native I talked to told me that a major highway had been built through it. I will continue to search as my military mission allows me. I have taken Zev's marker and reburied it in the cemetery. I have said kaddish for him and for all the other Jewish souls that may be buried here.

There is a great history to be written here, a great opportunity to recover the lost narrative of our people, the Sephardim of Iraq. My prayer and hope is that when the gates finally open for scholars the remnants of our people will still be here for historians to recover.

If this chapter of history is erased, it will never be recovered again. I pray that those with more resources, more connections, and more wisdom than I will be able to add to these pages of our great history. I am only thankful that God has given me a small part in it.

May the memories of our brothers and sisters--hakahal hakadosh d'Nineveh -- the holy community of Nineveh -- shall never be forgotten.

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com. Visit her new blog:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

TIME FOR ALL AMERICAN JEWS TO BECOME ORTHODOX
Posted by Rabbi Adam A. Winston, January 11, 2007.

Because it is the only way to survive into the next generation.

Qualms, objections or misinformation you have about being an Orthodox Jew -- are irrelevant, IF you care about your people. IF you care at all that G-d wants you to be and stay Jewish. IF you want to have Jewish grandchildren, then you must find a way to become Orthodox immediately.

We are way past the point of arguing "ideologies". Is my "team" Reform, Conservative, Re-constructionist, Unaffiliated or Whatever, better than yours or not. This is not about one-upmanship. This is about survival.

All the other strategies, philosophies and really neat ideas have failed. Nothing, absolutely nothing else works besides Orthodox. Nor do the Orthodox claim to be perfect. Once you join up, you will see how much time and effort we spend trying to improve things.

If you wish, you can check every study ever done over the past 3,000 years. Everyone else has assimilated into oblivion. Only the Orthodox remain.

Will it be easy to become Orthodox? No. But, it beats a statistical death.

What if I don't want to become Orthodox? Tough. We won't let you die quietly.

Actually, once you get over the initial shock, being Orthodox does lead to a higher life satisfaction. Much better family life, sense of purpose, being in sync with G-d's directions. It also, of course, gives you a bigger section of Heaven and much less time spent in Hell. But, we are not getting into that. We are just talking about survival here and now.

The Jewish people have struggled to maintain themselves for thousands of years and it all going to end with you and your friends? NO WAY! BE ORTHODOX NOW!

OK. So how do I do this?

First contact one of the organizations that help people make this transition and/or your local Orthodox Rabbi. Be patient because they will be swamped with requests for help. Here are some numbers to get you started:

Partners in Torah (Learn Judaism in person or on the phone): 800-STUDY-4-2 (800-788-3942)
The Discovery Seminar (An intense exploration of Judaism): 212-921-9090.
Aish HaTorah (Resources): www@aish.com.
Agudath Israel of America (To find a Rabbi or other experts): 212-797-7399, 212-797-9000.
ArtScroll Book catalog: 718-921-9000.
Feldheim Book category: 845-356-2282.

Second, Here is a nice list of things that will bring you over into the Orthodox realm. The list is surprisingly short. After the psychological trauma of realizing that you are going to need to make a major change in your life wears off, you will find that it is much easier than you ever imagined to live an Orthodox life. But, even if it were not, or is not, you really have no choice. There is a question of survival.

1. Ask G-d for help. This is the key to success.

2. Be constantly aware that G-d loves you with an infinite love.

3. Start doing actual Mitzvos (Commandments) immediately. Add new Mitzvos as soon as possible.

4. You might make mistakes or feel discouraged. This is normal. The key to triumph is to never give up.

5. Help your friends and family to grow in Judaism with patience and understanding, even if they are not moving as fast as you are.

DAILY SCHEDULE

1. Wake up and do Nitilas Yadaim (pour water on each hand with a cup, three times each -- alternately.

2. Men put on Teffilin -- black boxes worn on the forehead and bicep containing portions from the Torah (The Five Books of Moses). If you already have Teffilin, get them checked by a "Sofer" (an Orthodox expert scribe) to make sure they are Kosher (in accordance with Jewish law).

3. Pray the morning service called "Shachreis" (Buy an Orthodox prayerbook -- called a "Siddur". We recommend ArtScroll version to start.) Pray Mincha (afternoon service -- about 15 minutes) and Ma' ariv (evening service -- also about 15 minutes). Try to pray with a Minyan (Ten Jewish men over the age of 13) or pray by yourself if no Minyan is available. G-d loves to hear your prayers.

4. All foods that you eat and drink need to have Orthodox Rabbinical supervision, verifying that it is Kosher. Ask an Orthodox Rabbi how to Kosher your kitchen and about the special procedures for Passover. You will then buy new sets of separate dishes and pots for milk and meat. For Passover another 2 sets of dishes are need. Before Passover we clean our kitchen from all traces of non-Passover foods. We then cover any surface that might have come in contact with food. G-d awards us abundantly for all our efforts.

5. Say the Brachas (Blessings -- as found in the prayerbook) on food before and after you eat.

6. Have a set time each day to learn more about Judaism.

OTHER KEY OBSERVANCES

Men and boys -- wear some kind of head covering or Kippa.

Women -- In Judaism a woman is considered royalty and is require to dress in a manner befitting her station. She should dress modestly: skirt that covers her knees when sitting, shirt that covers the elbow when arm is raised. No exposed collarbone or back, or too tight or see-through. Married women cover their hair with a scarf, hat or wig - whatever she finds pleasing.

A married couple needs to observe the Laws of Taharas Mishpacha (Family purity). Ask an Orthodox Rabbi for the name of a female instructor who has experience and sensitivity in this important area. Those who observe these laws find that it improves their marriage, in addition to bringing G-d's approval.

Put a Mezzuzah (a parchment that contains a particular section from the Torah) on each doorpost of your home, except bathrooms. If you already have Mezzuzot, have them checked to make sure that they are Kosher and that the ink has not cracked or faded.

SHABBOS

Buy lots of your favorite foods and snacks. Try to cook partly on Thursday so that Friday is less hectic. Prepare activities, games and books for your children (and also the adults) Shabbos is a time for relaxation, being with the family and learning more about Judaism.

Light two candles 20 minutes before sunset. (The Blessings is found in the prayerbook.)

Go to shul (Jewish house of prayer) if within walking distance to speak with G-d for Kabbalas Shabbos (Receiving the Sabbath) and Ma'ariv. Or pray at home if necessary.

Make Kiddush (found in the Siddur) on a cup of wine and HaMotzee on two loaves of bread, followed by the Shabbos meal with lots of singing.

In the morning go to Shul for Shachreis and Mincha in the afternoon.

On Shabbos we cease our "creative mastery of the physical world" and as a result ascend into a higher spiritual plane. This is one of the reasons why certain activities that some might find physically relaxing -- taking a scenic drive, gardening, etc. are not permitted for spiritual reasons. Some of the laws of Shabbos may be hard to understand at first, but each one is necessary -- even regarding seemingly insignificant things.

On Shabbos do not: Turn electric appliances one or off (radio, TV, lights, etc.) It is a good idea to tape the light switches on or off (whatever you need for 25 hours). Timers may be used. Cover alarm motion sensors with foil until you can have a switch put in that de-activates the sensors for Shabbos. Take the light bulb out of the refrigerator.

Do not: Drive; Light a fire or cigarette; Use the telephone or computer; Write; or do Business.

Do not: Cook. You may prepare a thermos of hot water. Before Shabbos you can also leave already cooked food in a "slow cooker" for the morning. Take the whole ceramic vessel off the fire before serving and do not stir it on the fire. You can also roast a chicken for Shabbos night dinner and have the cold left-overs during Shabbos day.

Of course, if there is a danger to life, one may use the telephone, drive, etc. as needed.

Our connection with G-d is based upon His instructions as contained in the Jewish sources. You will need to have a regular program of study to find out how Judaism works and how to avoid mistakes in your observance.

You can do it! Tens of thousands of people just like you already have.

Rabbi Adam Winston

Contact Rabbi Winston by phone at 011-972-2-656-5391 and by fax at 011-972-2-656-4434

To Go To Top

WHO'S TO BLAME?
Posted by David Wilder, January 10, 2007.

Over the past few days Israeli media and blogs around the world have been chewing, regurgitating, and chewing again, a short video, filmed in Hebron a few months ago. The video shows Hebron resident Yifat Alkobi yelling and cursing some of her Arab neighbors, the Abu Isha family, who live across the street from the Alokobis and the other 17 families who live in the Tel Rumeida neighborhood.

Of course, for the Israeli media, this kind of film is similar to a big piece of chocolate cake with cream and a cherry on top. A live portrait of the 'monsters of Hebron.' Jewish monsters, of course.

However, all those having a field day over the Yifat video have either forgotten, or never knew, or prefer to ignore a number of important facts:

1. The Tel Rumeida neighborhood, the highest Jewish neighborhood in the city, perching atop a hill, faces, to the north, the Harat a-Shech Hills. These hills were abandoned by Israel to the Arabs exactly ten years ago a part of the infamous Hebron Accords. All Israeli security forces were removed from Harat a-Shech.

When the Olso War (aka the 2nd intifada) began in October, 2000, on the eve of Rosh HaShana, Tel Rumeida came under attack from those hills. Terrorists shot from those hills into Tel Rumeida for two years. All the caravan homes, comprised of pasted-together plasterboard walls, were hit by Arab gunfire. The homes are all full of bullet holes. One Friday afternoon, when the Alkobi's firstborn daughter Tziporah was playing outside, a terrorist lined her up in his rifle scope and fired. The bullet missed Tziporah's head by a few centimeters.

2. Just over eight years ago an Arab terrorist penetrated the Tel Rumeida neighborhood at about 11:00 PM, entered the home of Rabbi Shlomo Ra'anan from a back window, and stabbed to death the 63 year old Rabbi in his pajamas. The terrorist could not have perpetrated his attack without 'inside information' gleaned from, who else, Arab neighborhood residents.

3. About a year and a half ago, following the expulsion of 10,000 Jews from Gush Katif and the northern Shomron, a group of radically extremist Arab organizations, headed by EU-funded ISM, and joined by groups like 'anarchists against the wall,' the Christian Peacekeeping Team, Ecumenical Escorters, and with tacit support from TIPH -- Temporary International Presence in Hebron, decided to focus on Tel Rumeida, with the goal of wiping the Jewish presence their off the map.

Of course, the ends justify the means: the group's participants are ordered to physically intervene against Israeli security forces: "The project will be activist-oriented. Unlike other organizations, the project work will not be "witness" or "presence" oriented... Assertively advocate for Palestinians of Tel Rumeida-Physically intervene when soldiers or settlers attack Palestinians. [http://www.telrumeidaproject.org/Proposal.html]

These so-called activists, all foreigners, openly incite the Arabs against Israeli security forces and civilians. Their actions are overtly provocative, attempting to draw both Israeli adults, children and soldiers into violent situations, which they then selectively film, for use by media and internet. Of course, the films are professionally edited, so as to leave out segments which they clearly are not interested in being witnessed by the public-at-large. So too, with the "Alkobi video:" the events leading up to public version can be left up to your imagination.

4. A true, short story, about the family in question, the Abu Isha clan, (which has been transformed by ISM et al into the Hebron media PA family of the neighborhood): A number of years ago one of the Jewish Tel Rumeida families had a broken piece of furniture. Their across-the-street neighbor, Mr. Abu-Isha, was a carpenter, and very naturally, they brought their broken chair to him to be fixed. When he completed the work and they asked the cost of the work he replied, "I don't take money from neighbors." It seemed that the days of the Messiah arrived; children from both families began playing together, Jewish and Arab children playing in Hebron.

One day, as happens with children all over the world, the kids had a fight and this one went home crying and that one went home crying. A little while later the Jewish woman heard someone knocking at her door. When she opened it, one of the Abu-Isha clan stood their, and started screaming at her. (Did you see it on internet?) After a little while he turned around and went home. Shortly afterwards, a soldier stationed in the neighborhood approached the woman and asked her if she wanted to issue a complaint against the man who had screamed at her. She responded that she didn't understand Arabic, and she had no idea what he had said. The soldier replied, "I understand Arabic -- he said he was going to come back with a knife and kill all of you." Needless to say, the kids stopped playing together.

5. In conclusion, it is also important to try and keep events in proportion to their actual significance. For example, yesterday I read in Israeli internet news about a man who murdered someone because of an argument between..... two dogs. One dog bothered another dog in a coffee house in Haifa, and as a result a man was stabbed in the heart and killed. The murderer was convicted and sentenced to eighteen years in prison but appealed the harshness of the punishment. Israel's illustrious Supreme Court accepted the appeal and reduced the sentence by three years, leaving the killer in jail for fifteen years. As Israeli punishment goes, I expect he'll be out after ten.

Did you know anything about this story? Which seems to be more significant: A Jewish woman yelling at an Arab woman, or a man who was convicted of killing another man because of a dog, and whose jail sentence was reduced due to its extreme severity?

6. And finally, what really happened? What's shown in the video? A woman yelling at another woman. Now, let me ask you, when was the last time you yelled at someone -- a co-worker, a spouse, a child -- hand on your heart. Did you ever have a dispute with a neighbor and 'let go?' Did it make international news headlines? On Israeli news -- Kol Yisrael headline news, one of the features is that Yifat Alkobi from Hebron has been ordered by police to submit to interrogation. If she doesn't appear an arrest warrant will be issued. This is headline news? Only because it's an Arab and a Jew in Hebron. Yifat didn't take a gun into their house and shoot anyone, she didn't go inside and turn the house inside out -- she yelled at an Arab women. Maybe her choice of words was 'undesirable' but believe me, I've heard worse. And great confessions: even at times I've lost it and used some pretty coarse language. I know a few righteous people who've never used such words, but not too many of them.

Again, the difference is Jews and Arabs in Hebron, incitement, provocations, and a well-placed video camera. And of course, a firm target: let's get the Jews out of Tel Rumeida.

In reality, that's the whole story. So you tell me, who's to blame?

David Wilder is spokesman of The Jewish Community of Hebron. You can contribute directly to The Jewish Community of Hebron, POB10, Kiryat Arba-Hebron 90100, hebron@hebron.org.il, 972-2-9965333 or write to The Hebron Fund, 1760 Ocean Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11230, hebronfund@aol.com

To Go To Top

PACE UNIVERSITY THREATEN JEWS
Posted by Gerald A. Honigman, January 10, 2007.

This was written by David Andreatta and is entitled, "Pace's Docu Drama: Bigs 'threaten' Jews " It appeared yesterday in the New York Post
www.nypost.com/seven/01092007/news/regionalnews/ paces_docu_drama_regionalnews_david_andreatta

January 9, 2007 -- Pace University administrators threatened to sic the cops on a Jewish-student club if it went ahead with plans to screen a critically acclaimed film about radical Islam, the head of the group charged yesterday.

Michael Abdurakhmanov, president of Pace Hillel, said two deans warned that showing the documentary film would implicate club members as suspects in two hate crimes involving the desecration of the Koran at the university's lower-Manhattan campus last fall.

In addition, Abdurakhmanov said an assistant dean physically restrained him as he attempted to defend the film and his group in a meeting with administrators.

"The message was pretty clear, if you show this film, you're going to incriminate yourself," Abdurakhmanov said.

Pace spokesman Chris Cory acknowledged that officials encouraged Hillel to postpone the screening until tensions over the hate crimes dissipated, but dismissed the accusations of coercion as "far-fetched," "implausible" and "unprofessional."

Hillel had planned to screen "Obsession" during Judaism Awareness Week in November. The school stepped in after receiving complaints from Muslim students that the film negatively portrayed Islam.

In September and October, copies of the Koran were found in toilets in men's rooms on the Manhattan campus. Those incidents were followed by the discovery of a swastika scrawled on a bathroom wall and a Hillel event poster.

Abdurakhmanov, a 20-year-old psychology major from Brooklyn, said neither he nor any member of his club had reason to believe they were suspects in the Koran incidents until the dean of students, Marijo Russell O'Grady, suggested it.

"Her words were if you show this film, the police will be looking into your records further," Abdurakhmanov said.

He added that he knew of no one who had been contacted by the NYPD's Hate Crime Task Force. An NYPD spokesman declined to say whether there were any suspects in the cases.

In a second meeting with university administrators, Abdurakhmanov claims an assistant dean, David Clark, twice pushed him into a seat when he tried to stand to speak.

Phone messages and e-mails left for the president of the Muslim Students Association, which objected to the film and attended the meetings, were not returned.

"The bottom line is the university never told them not to show the film," said Cory, the Pace spokesman. "This was a good-faith effort by the deans to mediate between the Muslim Students Association and Hillel."

Gerald A. Honigman, a Florida educator, has created and conducted counter-Arab propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has publicly debated Arab spokesmen. His articles and op-eds have been published in both the print media and on websites. Contact him at honigman6@msn.com or go to his website: http://geraldahonigman.com/blog.php

To Go To Top

SEPHARDIC ANTI-ZIONIST EXTREMISTS
Posted by Steven Plaut, January 10, 2007.

1. Sephardic Anti-Zionist Extremists
http://www.jewishpress.com/page.do/20329/ Anti%2DZionism%2C_Sephardic_Style.html
Anti-Zionism, Sephardic Style

There is a widespread perception in Israel that Sephardic Jews are more sensible than the rest of us. Sephardim, or "Oriental Jews" as they are commonly if mistakenly called (strictly speaking, the two terms are not interchangeable), tend to shy away from the various manifestations of non-moderation that afflict Ashkenazi or "Western" Jews.

Sephardic Jews seldom are either complete pork-munching secularists or black-coated haredim, though there is a movement toward the latter within some Sephardic communities. Sephardim also tend to shy away from political extremism in all its forms. On average they seem closer to the traditional Jewish ideal of avoiding all forms of immoderation.

By and large, the common sense approach has served Sephardic Jews in Israel and elsewhere quite well. Within Israel, Sephardim have held the most senior political leadership positions (other than prime minister) and are judges, professors, army commanders, leading entertainers, high-tech entrepreneurs, etc. The rate of Ashkenazi-Sephardi "intermarriage" is high and has done much to eliminate the residual Jewish sub-ethnic distinctions in Israel. (I say that as someone who carefully answers to a Sephardic wife.)

Having noted all this, the point also needs to be made that there is a small but growing group of malcontents and political extremists who have emerged from the Sephardic communities. While Sephardic integration and participation in Israeli society is an unambiguous success story, these radicals are people who argue that not only are Sephardic Jews victims of rabid Ashkenazi "racism" and "discrimination," but that they are in fact the natural allies of Palestinians and Islamists.

The existence of this band of Sephardic extremist anti-Zionists was brought to public attention by Meyrav Wurmser, director of the Center for Middle East Policy at the Hudson Institute, in an article titled "Post-Zionism and the Sephardi Question" that appeared in the Spring 2005 issue of Middle East Quarterly.

Wurmser documented the anti-Israel and anti-Zionist pronouncements of Sephardic communists and extremists, many of them on the faculties of Israeli universities. Such extremists are also the focus of Israel Academia Monitor (IAM), a watchdog group that exposes the extremist politics of Israeli academics (though its focus is not on Sephardic extremists as such).

Among the Sephardic academic extremists named and exposed by Wurmser and IAM are Sami Shalom Chetrit (whose personal website features claims that Israel behaves like Nazi Germany), Oren Yiftachel, Yehouda Shenhav, and Smadar Lavie (active in promoting boycotts of Israel).

Political extremism characterized small groups of Sephardic Jews even in their original countries, before they emigrated to Israel, France and the U.S. Iraq in particular had a communist party that contained relatively large numbers of Iraqi Jews (and Christians), perhaps because they believed -- foolishly -- that a communist regime would create conditions under which they wold no longer be inferior in status to Muslims.

The Jewish experiences in the Iraqi Communist Party have been romanticized and are one of the dominant repeating themes in the writing of popular Israeli author Sami Michael (see, for example, his novel Refuge), who grew up in Iraq and joined the party at the age of 15. Michael is still a member of Israel's radical Literary Left, more extreme even than people like David Grossman, A.B. Yehoshua (who is also Sephardic) and Amos Oz.

Michael was cited in Haaretz (Oct 21, 2004) as justifying Palestinian terror attacks against Jewish Israelis. Here are his words as quoted by Haaretz:

Michael understands the Hamas members who are fighting these Jews, who stuck a wedge down their throats. In an interview published in the latest issue of New Horizons, a monthly on society and the state published by the Berl Katznelson Foundation, Michael rejects the definition of Hamas fighters as "terrorists."

"Imagine the feeling if I woke up tomorrow and saw this neighborhood, which we inhabit, forcibly conquered by the Syrians, and they established settlements here, and in order to go to the bus station, I needed permission from the Syrian army. How would I feel?" the author from Haifa asked. "If I fight them, I will be considered a terrorist. Why am I a terrorist? Why do we call Hezbollah or Hamasniks terrorists? Why? Because he fights on his own territory? Suddenly, aliens, occupiers, land on him and tell him: "Your house is ours. It's his land, he and his forefathers were born here, and the settlers say: We will never leave ... How would you respond to this?"

Political extremism among Sephardic communists has not been limited to words. Most notoriously, the fringes of Israel's Sephardic communities produced Mordechai Vanunu, the spy who tried to reveal Israel's nuclear secrets to its enemies, and Tali Fahima, arrested for collaborating in planning terrorist atrocities against Jews with her Palestinian boyfriend. Back in the 1960's, a number of Sephardim were affiliated with the Maoist group Matzpen, which produced its own espionage ring of traitors and spies working for Syria.

In an attempt to build a power base by fanning resentment among Israeli Oriental Jews over supposed discrimination, Sephardic radicals have formed a small lobby that calls itself the Mizrachi Democratic Rainbow Coalition or Keshet Mizrachit.

Keshet is left-wing and anti-Zionist; a number of its leading members have been involved in promoting international boycotts of and divestment from Israel. Its most important "cause" has been fighting what it considers to be unfair land uses in Israel. It has specialized in bashing kibbutzim, which it considers to be Ashkenazi enclaves controlling land that should be used to benefit low-income towns.

In the late 1960's, a protest movement calling itself the Black Panthers attracted considerable media attention. It failed to attract massive Sephardic support and quickly fell apart, after which some of its erstwhile leaders joined the Israeli Communist Party.

As for charges of discrimination against Oriental Jews in Israel, I happen to be the co-author (with my Sephardic wife) of the most thorough statistical investigation of wage and income disparities in Israel to date ("Income Inequality in Israel," Israel Affairs 8 (3), 2002, pp. 49-68).

In the Israeli labor market there are virtually no signs of any discrimination against Oriental Jews in wages and incomes (nor against Arabs, for that matter). There are differences in incomes across groups due to differences in their age structures, savings rates, schooling, family size, and other factors unrelated to ethnic discrimination. If any ethnic sub-group in Israel under-earns relaive to its level of schooling, it is the recent immigrants from the post-communist countries.

Sephardic communism has benefited from the sponsorship of a number of Israeli Post-Zionist academics, most notably Tel Aviv University Professor Yehouda Shenhav (currently under consideration for a position at Columbia University). Born Yehouda Shaharabani to Iraqi parents who immigrated to Israel, he later changed his name to a less obviously Sephardic one. He teaches Marxism and anti-Zionism to Tel Aviv University students and edits the Marxist Israeli journal Theory and Criticism.

Shenhav was a visiting faculty member at Columbia University when the radicals at the campus of the late Edward Said were turning it into a hotbed of anti-Israel sentiment. Unsurprisingly, Shenhav did not speak out against the rising campus anti-Semitism there nor did he denounce the academic ultras. During his appearances at antiwar rallies there, Shenhav compared the war in Iraq to "Israeli acts of aggression in the West Bank," which he saw as "acts of colonialism" led by "crude military men."

Shenhav's main academic thesis, picked up and promoted by nearly all the other Sephardic anti-Zionist radicals, has been the claim that Asian/Sephardic Jews who came to Israel from Arab countries are in fact Arabs of the Jewish faith. He insists that their national identity is determined by language and not by religious identity.

He has promoted this view that Sephardic Jews are Arabs in numerous articles and his recent book, The Arab Jews: Nationality, Religion and Ethnicity, won rave reviews from anti-Israel activists. Shenhav considers Zionism to be a form of colonialism. Indeed, he has long argued that Sephardic Jews and Palestinians need to unite to fight Zionism and liberate the Middle East from Ashkenazi Zionism.

His ideas are reincarnations of those of the old dead "common cause" once promoted by the Communist Party in Palestine from the 1920's onward. The greatest of historic ironies occurred when that party split into two separate communist parties in the 1950's, one for Arabs and one for Jews, because the two groups of communists could not get along.

Shenhav has staunchly opposed the idea of compensation for the lost property of Sephardic Jews by the Arab and Muslim countries they left, though he wants the Palestinians to be granted a "right of return."

Sephardic extremism has not only emerged at the fringes of communities in Israel. Perhaps the leading American Sephardic anti-Zionist is one David Shasha, a follower of Shenhav. Born in the U.S. of Syrian Jewish descent, he attended the Yeshivah of Flatbush and he is today the director of something called the Center for Sephardic Heritage.

Shasha is a vociferous critic of Israel and Zionism and his Israel-bashing articles are regularly published by the fundamentalist American Muslim magazine and website. His notion of Sephardic separateness is to advocate Sephardic alliance with Islamic radicalism.

Mainstream Sephardic institutions maintain no ties with Shasha and his center. In contrast, the Swedish anti-Zionist extremist calling himself "Israel Shamir" regularly runs Shasha's anti-Israel screeds on his own web page, as does the extreme left-wing academic Norman Finkelstein.

Shasha's notion of Sephardic nationalism translates into ferocious denunciations of Israel and Zionism. He is so determined to anchor Sephardism in Arab culture that he adopts an Arab view of history and political reality. He writes: "The Zionist version of things had it that the Arabs were the aggressors and thatthose same Arabs harbored an implacable hatred for Jews from time immemorial; a hatred which was merely another chapter in a very long history of anti-Semitism."

In other words, Shasha rejects such a factual "narrative" as fundamentally false. He enthusiastically endorses all the anti-Zionist "New Historians" and is a fan of Norman Finkelstein. He writes: "Zionism has played fast and loose with those facts and then created a series of pseudo-liberal fictions that make Zionism appear benign. Rather than accepting the basic facts of history, Zionism has sought to refigure those facts and create multiple illusions; illusions that have blocked any sense of possible resolution."

Shasha goes on to endorse theories about Jewish cabals invented by anti-Semites: "The Israeli propaganda machine has become a ubiquitous presence in the American Jewish community and any attempt to generate and promote alternative sources of information carries the crushing burden of threatening that merciless beast, a beast which can do great damage to its critics."

A devotee of the Shenhav thesis that Sephardic Jews are in fact Jewish Arabs and that Zionism is little more than Ashkenazi racism, Shasha has denounced me as an "Ashkenazi racist-mongerer" for criticizing Shenhav's ideas. He has written numerous articles bewailing the alleged abandonment by Sephardic Jews of their historical devotion to Arab "Levantine" culture and their Westernization in Israel and elsewhere.

To promote his agenda, he distorts and prettifies Jewish experience under Islamic regimes. He writes, in an article titled "A Jewish Voice Left Silent: Trying to Articulate 'The Levantine Option' ":

Until the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 Arab Jews created a place for themselves in their countries of origin by serving in government, civic affairs, business, and the professions.... The model of Levantine Jewish historical memory would serve to collapse the alienating cult of persecution harbored in classical Zionist thought and omnipresent in the rituals of the state of Israel, replacing it with a more positive view of the past that would lead us into a more optimistic present. The nihilistic "realism" of the current Israeli approach, centered on the institutionalized perpetuation of the twin legacies of the Holocaust and European anti-Semitism, would then be countered by memories of a Jewish past that was able to develop a constructive relationship to its surrounding environment.

He opposes all vestiges of "Ashkenazifying" the Sephardic Jews, which in his mind means forcing on them modernization of life style and identification with Israel.

When Middle East Quarterly ran Meyrav Wurmser's above-mentioned study of Sephardic radicalism, Shasha responded in a rage. Writing in The American Muslim, he denounced the Quarterly's editor, Daniel Pipes, as "reactionary." Elsewhere he wrote: "Israel is purportedly a democracy, but it does seem rather strange that those who espouse the most virulent and racist forms of Zionism are constantly berating and de-legitimizing the rights of others -- in this case the Sephardim -- from freely criticizing those who have wronged them."

How ironic that the emergence of a movement of Sephardic communists and anti-Zionist extremists represents, first and foremost, the infection of such people by the disease of left-wing lunacy and assimilationist self-hatred that has long afflicted Ashkenazim and Western Jewish communities.

Our Sephardic brethren may need to coin a Ladino, Arabic, and Hebrew equivalent for "shande" (Yiddish for "disgrace").

2. Making Judaism silly:
January 5, 2007
Wall Street Journal
January 5, 2007
DE GUSTIBUS
"Reviving Judaism: Consultant-Speak Goes Religious"
By Naomi Schaefer Riley

A few weeks ago, Hillary Clinton got started on a new "listening tour." Her first one, during the 2000 Senate campaign, was aimed at soliciting the ideas of New York voters on what legislative issues were important to them. This one is aimed at hearing the thoughts of Democratic strategists on the subject of her presidential run. But the idea behind the tours remained the same: Find out what the people want -- and, if possible, give it to them.

In politics, such an approach has an irrefutable democratic logic. But is it well suited to religion? Arnold Eisen, the chancellor-elect of the Jewish Theological Seminary, has spent the past few months on a "listening tour" of his own, holding town-hall meetings around the country to figure out how to reinvigorate Conservative Judaism. Mr. Eisen is looking to find out what Jews want -- and, if possible, give it to them.

Trying to make Judaism more popular is not a new idea. Jewish leaders have worried for decades that high rates of intermarriage and assimilation are causing the Jewish population to diminish dramatically. And they are right. Between 1990 and 2000, the American Jewish population declined to 5.2 million from 5.5 million. With Jewish women getting married later in life and having fewer children, this trend is likely only to accelerate.

But the most recent response to this crisis has been less than inspiring. The Jewish Week recently published "17 Seriously Cool Ideas to Remake New York's Jewish Community." These included creating a Jewish culinary institute, building a kibbutz in the Big Apple, providing high-quality Jewish toddler care, hosting a hipper Israeli Independence Day parade and baking better kosher pizza.

Perhaps these ideas were meant to be a little tongue-in-cheek, but other ideas are not -- and probably should be. Take a new project called Synaplex. Sponsored by the Star Foundation, Synaplex is, according to its Web site, "designed to provide people with new reasons to make the synagogue the place to be on Shabbat." About 125 synagogues are already "enabling people to celebrate Shabbat the way they want to."

What does that mean? Instead of attending a traditional service, Rabbi Hayim Herring, Star's executive director, tells me, some people would do "Medi-Torah" or "Torah and Yoga." Others might attend a lecture or go to a musical service followed by a "latte cart." And still others might prefer to attend a Friday night wine-and-cheese reception.

Rabbi Herring says that some of the participating synagogues double or triple their attendance on the day of a "Synaplex" Shabbat, but it's not clear whether such one-day surges result in long-term membership gains. Religious groups that have grown the fastest in recent years (including Orthodox Judaism) are the ones that demand the most of their adherents, not the ones that offer religion (and refreshments) cafeteria-style.

Rabbi Herring acknowledges this trend when I mention it to him. But he is not sure that it applies to the people he is trying to serve. He believes that "one failure of some of the Jewish movements is bludgeoning people with the notion of mitzvah [commandments], as opposed to taking people where they are and being patient enough to not impose their own vision of spirituality."

As it happens, the Samuel Bronfman Foundation, whose mission is "to inspire a renaissance of Jewish life," gives money to the Synaplex project. Adam Bronfman, the foundation's managing director, tells me that "each individual accesses meaning differently." He himself was "born a Jew and decided to live a Jewish life," he says, and he wants "others to access that if that's what they choose."

This way of thinking is making its way onto college campuses, too, where Jewish leaders hope to persuade students to remain Jews and not drift into the surrounding secular culture. Wayne Firestone, the president of Hillel, the Foundation for Campus Jewish Life, says that the "millennials," the members of today's college generation, have "many different options" on campus. Their identity is "similar to a Windows operating system," with many programs running at once. The Jewish "program," in other words, has lots of competition.

After extensive surveys, Hillel has concluded that many unaffiliated Jews, in Mr. Firestone's words, "don't feel welcome" by the Jewish offerings on campus. I was surprised by this claim, having always thought that college was probably the easiest place to practice Judaism. At big universities particularly, services of all types are easily accessible. Kosher food is not hard to come by. Religious celebrations abound.

But if the surveys are correct, some Jewish students are still feeling left out. The problem, according to Mr. Bronfman (whose foundation also gives to Hillel), can be thought of in terms of ice cream: "Some people want rocky road and some people want vanilla and some want strawberry. But Hillel was only able to provide one aspect, one flavor."

So Hillel is expanding, hoping to double the number of students involved in campus Jewish life. It is offering community-service trips with Torah studies; hosting its activities in non-Hillel buildings; even reaching out to American Jews studying abroad.

There is nothing wrong with these ideas or anything else in Hillel's "five-year strategic plan," and they may result in greater numbers of students taking Jewish ideas and culture seriously. Indeed, the other outreach efforts, however tacky or trivial, may also strengthen Jewish life in America. Still, there is something strange about all this consultant-speak. Listening tours, marketing gambits and strategic plans may be an inescapable part of modern life, even in the realm of religion. But in the end, for a particular faith to thrive, God can't just be for dessert.

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116797187207267967.html

3. Down goes another infantile conspiracy "theory":
January 9, 2007
From Wall Street Journal
Roberta Wohlstetter, Codebreaker
January 9, 2007; Page A18

When Roberta Wohlstetter set out, in the early 1960s, to explain why the U.S. had been surprised by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, she confronted a puzzle that to some seemed like a conspiracy.

Unlike classic military surprises, the U.S. had received ample intelligence that the Japanese were prepared to attack the Hawaiian base. That nothing was done to remove American ships to safety was proof, for Clare Booth Luce among others, that Franklin Roosevelt had "lied us into war because he didn't have the courage to lead us into it." But Wohlstetter, who died Saturday at age 94, knew better, and she spelled it all out in "Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision," perhaps the most important book ever written on military intelligence.

Yes, the U.S. had intelligence that Pearl Harbor was a potential Japanese target. But other intelligence suggested Siberia could be a target, or the Panama Canal, or the Philippines. Previous indications of an impending attack had served, like so many false alarms, to lower America's guard. And American planners had trouble believing the Japanese would launch a war against the United States that they couldn't possibly hope to win.

From this, Wohlstetter drew the essential conclusion that the U.S. failed to anticipate the attack on Pearl Harbor because, amid mountains of incomplete and often conflicting data -- what she called "noise" -- intelligence analysts couldn't distinguish the information that really mattered. This tended to lead, as the future Nobelist Thomas Schelling wrote in his preface to Wohlstetter's book, to "a routine obsession with a few dangers that may be familiar rather than likely."

The lessons are timeless, and foretold the findings of the 9/11 Commission. Contrary to the views of many so-called realists, nations do not always act from rational calculations of their self-interests: They can be reckless gamblers, something that should give pause to those who see nothing to worry about in the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon. And contrary to the instincts of many CIA "professionals," the best intelligence analysis requires judgment and imagination, not simply the widest possible data set.

Wohlstetter was also remarkable not simply as a woman working in what was then a "man's field," but also as the wife and intellectual partner of the late Albert Wohlstetter, the legendary nuclear-strategy theorist. Both Albert and Roberta were great friends of this page, as well as great patriots.

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116831048526770960.html

Steven Plaut is an American-trained economist, a professor of business administration at Haifa University and author of "The Scout." He frequently comments -- both seriously and satirically -- on Israeli politics and the left wing academic community. His website address is http://www.stevenplaut.blogspot.com.

To Go To Top

SECRET BBC MEMO REVEALS INSTITUTIONALIZED ANTI-ISRAEL BIAS OF BBC LEADERSHIP
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 10, 2007.
Below is a secret internal memo from a BBC director to his staff, dated 1.5.07, leaked by internal moles to outside contacts, one of whom emailed it to me. I have added footnotes (1-8) in the text, and then placed my comments and critique beneath the text, correlated to the footnotes. I believe that this memo is important. In and of itself it is puzzling in light of its many errors and ommisions; but when read along with my critical comments, it indicates the depths to which BBC leadership have descended in anti-Israel and pro-terrorist sentiments and directives. The BBC's perceived (but usually denied) anti-Israel and pro-terrorist stance is not the happenstance of a few reporters (many of whom are Muslim Arab citizens of the UK or Palestinian stringers), or the errors of some editors, or the lack of proper over-sight. The BBC's ant-Israel reportage is real, is intentional, is institutioalized at the highest levels, and is caused by directives such as the one below, coming from leadership at the highest levels. Why a BBC professioinal would choose to compromise truth and accuracy, and ignore the obvious history and dynamics of the conflict which his own news company has reported for decades, and slant his memo to make it look as though Israel is at cause for all of the Palestinian woes and failures...that is beyond my expertise, and I prefer to avoid speculation.
 

From: Jeremy Bowen
To: Editorial Board;
Newsg World-Bureaux-Eds;
Newsg World Asseds;
News Leadership Group;
Mark Byford & PA;
Simon Wilson-NEWS;
Jerusalem Bureau;
Newsg World-Affairs-Unit
Sent: Fri Jan 05 15:16:16 2007
Subject: FW: Mini briefing on the Israeli and Palestinians

2007 has started as unpromisingly as 2006 ended. The outlook is bleak because of fundamental instabilities and weaknesses on both sides.

Israel's major military incursion into Ramallah on Thursday, killing four Palestinians after a botched arrest operation, was a reminder of the non stop pressures of the Israeli occupation. (1)

What is new in the last year, and will be one of the big stories in the coming twelve months, is the way that Palestinian society, which used to draw strength from resistance to the occupation, is now fragmenting. (2)

The reason is the death of hope, caused by a cocktail of Israel's military activities, land expropriation and settlement building -- and the financial sanctions imposed on the Hamas led government which are destroying Palestinian institutions that were anyway flawed and fragile. (3)

The result is that internecine violence between Hamas and Fatah is getting worse. On Thursday six people were killed in clashes between them in Gaza. The death of a major figure on either side would spark something much more serious.

In Israel the political turmoil that followed the inconclusive war with Hezbollah last summer continues unabated.

There are signs that PM Ehud Olmert is trying to set up his coalition partner Amir Peretz as a scapegoat for Israel's problems during the war and since, by ousting him from the defence ministry. Olmert may be hoping he'll get away with it because Peretz's position as Labour leader is already under attack from within his own party. Peretz's people say that if Olmert tries it, the government will fall.

Even if (Olmert) does manage to demote Peretz, he probably won't improve his parlous position in the polls. It is exactly a year since Ariel Sharon's stroke, so Israelis are comparing their lost leader with the one they have now, and finding him wanting. An air of incompetence hangs around Olmert when it comes to military matters. Typical was the timing of the raid in Ramallah, which ruined yesterday's summit with Mubarak which was supposed to bring closer the release of the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. (4)

Olmert wants to replace Peretz at the defence ministry with Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister. Barak is a retired general, former head of the Israeli army and its most decorated soldier. (Among his many exploits was disguising himself as a woman during a raid in Beirut to kill various Palestinians) (5).

The feeling in Israel is that 2007 will be a year of wars, so aside from coalition politics Olmert wants to have a warrior next to him when they make the tough decisions. The in-tray could include whether or not to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.

Another serious problem for Olmert is that yet another corruption scandal is lapping close to him. This time the head of the PM's office in Jerusalem is under house arrest for her alleged role in corruption in Israel's tax authority. Olmert is not yet implicated, though he's already been under investigation over separate allegations.

The political crises in Israel -- and violent political disintegration among the Palestinians -- are not just internal matters. They make it impossible for the Israelis and the Palestinians to engage in a meaningful political dialogue, assuming that their protestations that they want one are true. (The one meeting that Olmert has had with Mahmoud Abbas can hardly be called a process.) (6)

Only strong Israeli and Palestinian leaders would be able to make the tough choices necessary to relieve the serious pressures that are building up in the holy land. To persuade their people to make the necessary concessions, they would need a strong political base, which neither Olmert nor Abbas possess. (7)

Because they are weak -- many would say lame ducks -- don't expect any progress. And since an uneasy status quo cannot hold, no political progress will equal more violence. (8)


 

My Comments:

1. "non-stop pressures of the Israeli occupation": Somehow Mr. Bowen seems not to have noticed the non-stop terrorism that Arafat began in 1994 just a few months after signing the Oslo peace accords. Mr. Bowen also seems to be ignorant of the 27 years when there was no non-stop pressure, from 7/1967 to 1/1994, and the economies of the West Bank and Gaza Strip throve mightily. Mr. Bowen's so-called "non-stop pressure" is Israel's defensive responses (restrained by comparison to what other countries have done to terrorist enemies and the civilian populations that support them.

2. "...used to draw strength from resistance to the occupation, is now fragmenting": So this is how Mr. Bowen describes 13 years of almost non-stop terrorism -- "resistance to occupation". With this choice of words, Mr. Bowen has just legitimized terrorism. By designating it as a source of strength, he not only legitimizes it, he lionizes it. It seems of no consequence to him that the Palestinian national movement to political self-determination is the only movement of its kind in the entire world, and across all of world history, that has terrorism as its sole defining paradigm and both policide and genocide as its primary goals.

3. "...The reason is the death of hope, caused by a cocktail of Israel's military activities, land expropriation and settlement building -- and the financial sanctions imposed on the Hamas led government which are destroying Palestinian institutions that were anyway flawed and fragile."

This one is too rich to be handled in one paragraph. We must analyze each piece separately:

"death of hope": hope for what? Palestinian polls and pronouncements from Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Fatah leaders all tell the world what their hope is: destroy Israel, genocide or exile its Jews, and create the state of "Palestine" ..."from the river to the sea". Does Bowen share that hope? It seems, from his writing and the lamenting tone of his words, that even if he does not share it he certainly feels it is legitimate, and a tragic loss that that hope has died.

Moreover, note what he thinks has caused that death:

a.) Israel's defenses against terrorism, which he calls: military activities. Does he think that Israel should do nothing to stop the endless terror attacks (almost 30,000 since 1993, with more than 1,700 dead Israelis and more than 6,000 wounded)?

b.) Israel's ceding of the entire Gaza Strip and destruction of 22 Israeli communities which had been home to 9,000 Israelis for 35 years; and Sharon's and Olmert's promises to cede more of the West Bank in peace talks when the terrorism stops. -- which Bowen calls land expropriation and settlement building.

c.) Financial sanctions: here he gets it right; but he fails to note that some of these sanctions are by Israel (withholding sales and VAT tax revenues). Does he think that Israel should give Hamas money so that Hamas can buy more weapons and explosives to more effectively and more extensively kill Israelis? And re sanctions from abroad, does he think that any country should give money to the politicized terror institutions (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, el-Qaeda, the PFLP, the PFLP-GC, the DFLP, Fatah, Tanzim, Force 17, the New Resistance Committees, el-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, Hezbollah, Sayyif Allah, Jayyish el-Jihad, inter alia) that routinely proclaim their intent to destroy those countries as soon as they are done with Israel?

d.) And these political institutions are anyway "flawed and fragile": poor things....what made them so flawed? Was it Arafat's decade-plus of kleptocracy and thugocracy? Was it the routine Mafia-like tactics of extortion and terrorism and blackmail and smuggling and money laundering that were part and parcel of the Palestinian Authority's modus operandi? Was it the basic foundation ideology of Hamas which promises, per its own "covenant" to utterly obliterate Israel, to genocide all Jews worldwide, and to take control of "all the ways of life" of non-Muslims everywhere? Bowen leaves that question unanswered.

4. "..timing of the raid". Bowen makes an accusation here, but he makes it subtly and underhandedly. He asserts indirectly that the timing of the raid in Ramallah was done in order to, or despite the knowledge that it would, disrupt the talks with Mubarrak. It does not seem to occur to him that the lives of Israelis under attack by Palestinians (who, the news reports tell us, were throwing refrigerators and large stones from roof-tops to try to kill the Israelis) were deemed more important by the Israeli government than the niceties and pretenses of the Olmert-Mubarrak talks. The timing was the exigency of saving lives.

5. "..various Palestinians". Odd choice of words, especially for a professional journalist. Were these just random Palestinians, happenstance targets? Did Israel mount this raid in to Lebanon, putting the lives of Israeli operatives at risk and expending much political coinage, just to kill a few Palestinians who happened to be around where Baraq and this crew landed on the Levantine coast? Obviously not, and Bowen cannot not know that. Baraq's incursion in to Lebanon was to kill terrorist leaders who had the blood of hundreds of Israelis on their hands and who were involved in the plans to kill hundreds or thousands more. The second objective of the raid was to show the terrorists that their safe havens in Lebanon were not safe...in the hope/expectation that such knowledge would lead to a curtailing of terrorism. Didn't work. But...such criminals can be termed "various" only if the author is trying to avoid the use of the correct term -- terrorists/mass murderers.

6. "..hardly be called a process". Why not? Why does Bowen minimize this meeting? It seems that he seeks to obfuscate the significance of Israel's repeated invitations to Palestinian leaders that they stop the terrorism and sit down to peace talks. If he acknowledged that the process is on-going, and it is the Palestinian side that keeps rejecting all negotiations and keeps promising to maintain the terror war; then he would need to admit that Israel is not to blame for everything ill in the world. Historically, the process is:

a) Israel declares that the Palestinians will (not can, not may, but WILL) have their state on most of the West Bank and all of the Gaza Strip (and, per the Baraq offer at Camp David 2...they also get Israeli territory bordering on the Gaza Strip to make up for what they lose to Israeli communities on the central-western edge of the West Bank).

b) Then a Palestinian spokesperson (Arafat, Qure'a, Abbas, Haniyeh, Masha'al, Zatar) rejects all possibilities of negotiations, and demands instead that Israel pull back to the '67 borders, render the West Bank and Gaza Strip totally "Judenrein", allow the return of 4,500,000 "Palestinian refugees" in to Israel proper to their self-defined former homes and lands.......and then the Palestinians will be prepared to negotiate.

c) To which Israel asks: if you get all of that, when then are we negotiating about....Israel's pre-67 territory?

7. Notice the moral and political equivalence in Bowen's placing both Omert and Abbas in the same political dilemma. Abbas sits as the titular head of a government that is involved in an imploding, a violent and lethal civil war, with a dozen or more factions (cf. supra, 3.c for list of fractious factions) run by what Arafat delighted to call "the democracy of the gun", headed by a terror organization elected by popular vote whose sole defining paradigm is terrorist violence and whose unrepentant and oft-ballyhooed goal is the destruction of Israel and genocide of Jewry world-wide. While Olmert was elected to office on a peace platform of the promise to cede more territory in exchange for peace and is teeter-tottering in his political strength in large part because the response that Israel has received from its major concession of the Gaza Strip and its promise for more concessions in the West Bank is nothing but more Palestinian violence and more terrorism and more promises of more of the same.

Moreover, notice the subtle but quite palpable moral equivalence in "...only strong Israeli and Palestinian leaders would be able to make the tough choices necessary..." He seems not to have noticed that Israel, from the level of elected leadership to the grass roots level of popular plebiscite, has already made those tough choices. The Qadima party was elected on the platform of "land for peace...even if done unilaterally". A majority of the Israeli electorate voted in to power the leaders who promised to act upon that platform.

It is beyond obvious that unilateral offers do not work, that the Israeli public's willingness to trade land for peace does not bring peace or even a Palestinian leadership willingness to stop the terrorism and talk about land for peace. But Bowen chooses to ignore the obvious by lumping the two sides together in what in reality describes only the Palestinian side.

8. "no political progress will equal more violence". Hmm.. How does he know? History has shown very much the opposite. With every step forward in political progress, we get more terrorism and more violence.

a.) Oslo I (9/1993) was deemed world-wide to be real political progress, and it brought a huge jump in terrorist violence against Israel.

b.) Oslo II (5/1995) was more political progress but the terror violence continued.

c.) Arafat's election in January 1996 was galactic political progress but the terrorism never stopped.

d.) Camp David 2 (6-7/00) was the offer of resolution via political progress and from there Arafat launched his 2nd Intifada (9/29/00).

e.) Camp David 2 redux (12/00-1/01) was Clinton's last best shot, best hope (for peace and for his Nobel Prize).......with the offer of political progress and the end to terrorism; but there was only more and more terrorism.

f.) Much of the largely deceived or self-deceived West hung great hope on Abbas' election, even as he promised in his pre-election speeches to maintain "chairman Arafat's vision" and never ever ever to interfere with the terrorist activities of the brethren in Hamas -- and indeed the terror continued even as this great political step forward was made

g.) And the most recent "political progress" was the election of Hamas to power: Hamas, the self-proclaimed and USA designated terrorist organization, which vitriolicaly and vociferously declares over and over its rejection of all "political progress" and all negotiation process, instead favoring its own process of choice: destroy Israel even if we must do it one Jew at a time.

Somehow, despite the fact that he is a journalist and must be knowledgeable about the dynamics of the conflict in the Middle East, Mr. Bowen is ignorant of all of the above...or perhaps he merely hopes that his audience is.

From the entire history of the conflict, from the first anti-Jewish pogroms against Zionist pioneers back in the late 19th century to today's anti-Israel and anti-Jewish global Arab terrorism which may soon ascend to the levels of nuclear capacities, it is obvious that if the terrorists would lay down their weapons, there would be no more violence. But if Israel laid down her weapons, there would be no more Israel.

however, to admit to the obvious would mean that Mr. Bowen could no longer blame Israel for everything, and would need to blame the terrorists for something.....and somewhere, somehow, some one is telling him that his news company's line must always be: Israel is to blame.

I wonder who that someone is.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

GIMME SHELTER
Posted by Moshe Feiglin, January 10, 2007.

Why does Israel have to invest three billion shekels to build an underground nuclear bomb shelter for the government? For those of you who do not understand what the endless construction work at the entrance to Jerusalem is all about, we have some disconcerting news. The construction is part of an atomic shelter six kilometers long in which Olmert, Livni, Peretz and their aides can continue to run the country with no fear -- even if a nuclear mushroom is billowing at street level. The shelter also serves as a shortcut to Israel's airport. No, this is not a joke. An elevator descends from the Prime Minister's office to the secret tunnels, far from the traffic congestion on the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway -- or the radioactive congestion -- straight to the airport and the reunion with Olmert's sons in New York. It's sort of like a modern-day Cave of Tzedekiah.

This morning I heard Avi Farchan. Twice exiled (from his home in Sinai and then from Gush Katif), Farchan expressed his indignation at the government's searching for a place to shelter the residents of southern Israel against heavy shelling from Gaza. "There is no difference between the residents of Sderot and the residents of Ein Gev and Gadot, who continued to plow their fields under Syrian shelling," Farchan insisted. It is impossible not to like Farchan, but he is a bit reminiscent of the Japanese soldier who continued to "fight" in the jungles tens of years after Hirohito had surrendered. The kibbutzniks in Ein Gev who continued plowing their fields had leadership that intended to triumph. The residents of Sderot are soldiers whose leadership has backed out of the battle, leaving them abandoned in the battlefield. Who has the right to tell them to stay put and be sitting ducks, when their government has already surrendered?

The only way to understand what is happening now in the Western Negev and in the negotiations for the release of Gilad Shalit is to realize that Israel's government has already surrendered. When they tell us that there is "no solution for the Kassams," they mean that they have raised the white flag. The State of Israel continues to exist due to inertia and thanks to the perseverance of its citizens.

So why spend so much money to shelter the government far underground? After all, Israel's government has already surrendered. Why take bread out of the mouths of the poor? The elegant solution would be to send the government to a safe haven in London now. Why London? Because the English have experience with governments in exile.

In his research, military historian Dr. Uri Milstein claims that Israel won the Six Day War because the Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin broke under the pressure of the war and was hospitalized in a psychiatric institution, thus rendering him incapable of bungling the army's battle plan. Who knows? Maybe a government in exile (elegantly implemented under the pressure of current events) will liberate the healthy forces in this nation, allowing them to rise, defend themselves and triumph?

Just think about all the money that we could save if we would halt the atomic shelter project. Think about all the miserable Arab refugees from Gaza who would be thrilled to get a small fraction of this money to start a new life in Canada. With these colossal sums we could have a genuine peace process here. If we add the 13 billion dollars that the Separation Fence will cost (that's right, the fence that cannot stop anything from flying over it or crawling under it), we could also begin to solve the problem of the Arabs of Shechem and Jenin.

Let's take this approach a step further. If we had the money that the Disengagement has already cost, we could begin to consider solving the problem of Israel's Arabs -- who are involved in approximately half of all terror attacks in Israel. If we add the incessant flow of funds that Israel has transferred to the terrorists since Oslo -- who knows? Maybe we could have set them all up with good jobs and nice houses all over the globe. Perhaps we could even have had something left over to buy medicine and food for hungry children in Israel. After all, we have already accepted the principle of Evacuation-Compensation, haven't we?

What? Gaza and Shechem belong to them??? O.K., if you think so, maybe you really should take the elevator underground -- as close as possible to the airport.

Manhigut Yehudit (Jewish Leadership) is a group of people inside the Likud party who want to see Israel adopt a more Jewish character. Moshe Feiglin, its cofounder, has emphatically said he does not want a theocracy, but he does want a State based on Jewish values. The Manhigut Yehudit website address is http://www.manhigut.org. To learn more about Manhigut Yehudit (Jewish Leadership) and to read their plan for Israel's future, visit www.jewishisrael.org. Or contact Shmuel Sackett, International Director (516) 330-4922 (cell)

To Go To Top

IRAN TAKING CONTROL OF IRAQ? ISLAMIFICATION OF THE U.S. JUDICIARY; HATE CRIMES NOT PROPERLY ANALYZED
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 10, 2007.

P.A. ADMITS ARAB FLIGHT VOLUNTARY

In al-Jadida, the official P.A. newspaper, "Mahmud Al-Habbash writes in a recent column that in 1948 the Arabs left their homes willingly under the instruction of their own Arab leaders and their false promises of a prompt return." He blames the Arab leaders, not forced expulsion by Israel. Two similar admissions were made by "Arab Member of Knesset, Ibraham Sarsur, who was then Head of the Islamic Movement in Israel, and the other by a Palestinian journalist, Fuad Abu Higla, in the official PA daily." (IMRA, 12/17.)

The Arabs generally admit the Arab refugee problem is their own fault, though for propaganda and as an excuse, they tell the West it is Israel's fault. How informative is Jimmy Carter's book that accuses Israel of forcing the Arabs out?

ROCKETS EVERY DAY

P.A. Arabs have been launching a couple of rockets almost every day, since they pledged to a ceasefire. The rockets have not made much news, because they often strike in empty fields or in buildings without injuring people (IMRA, 12/18).

IRAN TAKING CONTROL OF IRAQ

Iran is arming, training, and to some extent its officers on the spot in Iraq are running the Shiite militias and teaching them non-conventional warfare. Iranian units have infiltrated the country. Iranian charities build support for a Shiite society within the country. (This is what Hizbullah did in Lebanon and Hamas did in Gaza, to gain popularity.)

There still are more Sunni insurgents than Shiites. The extensive Saddam network of informants never was disbanded, and still operates. S. Arabia is the source for this security report, and may be sending, or be about to send, aid to the Sunnis and their network, to counteract Iran.

The US admits that Shiite militias have infiltrated Iraqi police but not that Iranians direct Iraqi units. Iraqi tribal leaders told the Saudi interviewers that high-level Baathist officers direct the insurgency of 77,000 activists, and only 17,000 religious, foreign fighters are in it (IMRA, 12/18).

A major US mistake was in not exterminating the Shiite militias and thus eroding Shiite Islamist power.

ISRAELI INITIATIVE WITH MUSLIMS

Indonesians and Malayans would like to know more about Israel, but have no source of information. To remedy this and to promote cooperation, the government has opened a web site in the Indonesian language (IMRA, 12/18).

The value of this initiative depends much on what Israel states about itself. Will it be positive or apologetic, assertive, or appeasement-minded?

U.S. OFFICIALS NAÏVE

CAIR held a fundraiser in California, to which some elected American officials came. One of them thanked the organization for helping to fight against terrorism and prevent abuses of civil liberties in that fight. Thank goodness for CAIR, she said, for serving as intermediary between the government and the Muslims (Daniel Pipes #736, 12/18).

CAIR exists to promote jihad. It raises funds for terrorism, fights efforts against terrorism, and undermines government anti-terrorism. Mr. Pipes urges US officials to find non-Islamist Muslim leaders to work with, and to work against CAIR and like organizations.

ISLAMIFICATION OF THE U.S. JUDICIARY

When a prosecutor wanted to summon Sami al-Arian, convicted of promoting terrorism, to testify in another case, al-Arian's attorney asked for a postponement until after the Muslim holiday of Ramadan. The prosecutor refused.

He said, "If they can kill each other during Ramadan, they can appear before the grand jury; all they can't do is eat before sunset. I believe Mr. Al Arian's request is part of the attempted Islamization of the American justice system. I am not going to put off Dr. Al Arian's grand jury appearance just to assist in what is becoming the Islamization of America." Al-Arian refused to testify. He was found in contempt of court (Op. Cit.). Good for the US judges!

PM OLMERT SPOKE WITH U.S. SENATORS

"The Prime Minister stressed that despite the fact that the firing of Kassam rockets has not stopped, Israel is honoring the ceasefire. He also discussed assistance to the

Palestinian (Arab) civilian population and various ways under consideration to extend such assistance without aiding extremists that support terrorism." (IMRA, 12/18.)

Why does Israel honor a ceasefire, and take pride in honoring one that the Arabs requested for an opportunity to arm for a bigger war and don't themselves honor? Why does Israel help the so-called civilians whose hatred of Jews buoys terrorism?

ANOTHER LIMIT TO ISLAMIST CEASEFIRES

Israel arrested two Tanzim (Fatah) men for terrorism. They were directed by Hizbullah to attempt suicide bombings, despite the ceasefire (IMRA, 12/19). Thus the head of Fatah, Abbas, pledges to a ceasefire, but his men work for Islamists who use them as part of a continuing jihad directed from Iran via Hizbullah.

HATE CRIMES NOT ANALYZED RIGHT

This year, British police started recording the religion of religious hate crime victims. They still do not record the religion of the assailants. Police deduced from the new statistics, "Jewish people are four times more likely to be attacked in Britain because of their religion than Muslims." (Tom Harper & Ben Leapman, NY Sun, 12/18, p.5 from Daily Telegraph.)

Although technically correct, the deduction is misleading. There are about four times as many Muslims in Britain as Jews. That means that a Jew's chance of being attacked is 4 X 4 or 16 times as great as a Muslim's.

The absence of figures on the assailants' religion deprives the figures of half their meaning. I suspect that Jews hardly every attack other people and that most of the attacks on Jews are by Muslims. That would mean that the Jews basically are more tolerant and the Muslims have little right to complain.

Is it fair to generalize when most people don't commit crimes? I think so. There probably would be much less hate crime by certain ethnic groups, if their people did not condone it. The rising antisemitism in Britain, expressed partly by defamation of the Jewish state, by reduced law enforcement against Muslims, and by Muslim separatism. These phenomena leave young Muslims, whose faith is one of hatred, encouraged that they can get away with violence.

ISRAEL THINKS THERE WON'T BE CIVIL WAR IN GAZA

Israeli Intelligence believes that the current level of strife won't degenerate into a full-scale civil war, just more fighting between militias. The reason is that many families have members in different militias, for protection from them all. "Leave my family alone," some militiaman is sure to say (Arutz-7, 12/19).

WHAT DOES HILLEL HALKIN THINK?

In the past six years, mutual trust between Israel and the P.A. has dissolved. A long-term Hamas truce may be worth the price. If the P.A. becomes rational, fences won"t be needed (NY Sun, 12/19, p.9).

Truces are a Muslim tactic. Under cover of truce, they extricate themselves from defeat and prepare for renewed military assault. When ready, they would find an excuse to end the truce, if it weren't about to expire. Note that they violate their ceasefires routinely. The way to deal with the totalitarian Islamist enemy is to defeat it.

"Mutual trust" is a misleading concept. Islamists believe in deceit, Israel acts like a peace partner. Therefore, Israel is trustworthy by the Arabs, but the Muslims are not trustworthy. Muslims are taught to be suspicious of Jews, so they don't trust Israel.

For the P.A. to become peaceable, it would have to reform Islam. That is not foreseeable, so it is misleading to discuss it now, as if it were an option.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

BEARDS CARRY NO IMMUNITY (ON NETUREI KARTA AND OTHERS)
Posted by Sergio (HaDaR) Tessa, January 10, 2007.

David Ha'ivri writes:

As of late, we have seen many people from within our nation publicly join hands with our enemies, and those who wish to destroy us. Most public of all was the recent participation of the traitorous Neturei Karta members, who visited Iran (not for the first time), and attended an event to discuss the "Holocaust Myth." And so, these supposed Jews stood side by side with Muslim anti-semites, holocaust deniers, and Klu Klux Klan members, and joined them in calling for the destruction of Israel.

However, this is not the first time that such people have been so active in helping our enemies to destroy us. They recieve huge amounts of money from various sources within the Arab world, (including the PLO,) and in return they have stood side-by-side with nazis, terrorists, and other anti-semites at demonstrations and events worldwide.

This article, written almost 20 years ago, was written by Rabbi Meir Kahane z"tl h"yd, and as usual, his words ring truer than ever, even so long after his death...
(http://kahane.blogspot.com/2007/01/ beards-carry-no-immunity-by-rabbi-meir.html)

Once more we can say with certainty that Rabbi Kahane was right! Had they listened to him all those years ago we would not have to deal with the grotesque results of their inaction today...

Published originally on November 10th 1989

"And Judah too, shall fight against Jerusalem..." (Zechariah 14)

The briefest of hints, but a chilling one: that in the end of days, Judah, Jews, will join the gentile enemy in war against Jerusalem. And behold, we see it in our days. The self hating Jewish anti-Semite. The Jew who fights his own people, who joins with the enemy of Jerusalem in battle against Jerusalem.

Disturbed Michael Lerner of Tikkun Magazine carried a "revised" list of sins for which we should beat our breasts on Yom Kippur as we recite Al Het (for the sin). For example:

"For the sins we have committed by not publicly criticizing the Jewish people and Israel when they are acting as oppressors."

"For not recognizing the humanity and pain of the Palestinian people."

The same disturbance places an expensive full page ad in The New York Times with the huge headline: "No, Mr. Shamir. Don't assume that American Jews support your policies toward the Palestinians."

Moshe Arens' son, Professor Yigal Arens of the University of California, creates a group called Jewish Committee on the Middle East (JCOME) and places a large ad in several publications. It reads, in part:

"We are Americans and Jews and we come together at this time to publicly express our strong desire to see the US take meaningful steps to disassociate our country from the policies of Israel... We can no longer condone or be associated with such Israeli behavior, nor, do we believe should our country."

Yigal Arens and his fellow Jews then call upon the United States to cut economic and military aid to Israel. Thus:

"For these reasons, we believe the time has come to normalize the U.S. relationship with Israel. A complete re-evaluation of what has become, since 1967, the American sponsorship of Israel, is required. The unprecedented amounts of economic aid should be cut back over the next two to three years to much smaller levels. Furthermore, the considerable military and intelligence assistance should also be radically reduced."

A Jew named Lenny Brenner writes a viciously anti-Semitic book, Jews in America Today, which is grist for the mill of every Nazi and Jew-hater.

And then there is another Jewish group.

The article appeared in the Magazine, The Message International, a fundamentalist Moslem publication that is venomously opposed to the existence of Israel. It began this way:

"We participate together with the Palestinian people in their anguish and suffering. We feel their intense pain and frustration resulting from the cruel oppression they are enduring under the brutal Zionist occupation of their Palestinian homeland. This is especially so since we understand the overwhelming justice of their right to self-determination and statehood in their beloved Palestine. A yearning that burns fervently to be free and sovereign in their native land."

The article was written by a Jewish group and continued with:

"The genuine Jewish people recognize the Palestinian people as the legal sovereign over their entire land, not just the West Bank and Gaza. The Zionists have absolutely no right to rule the land."

The same Jewish group issued the following statement as part of a pamphlet issued September 15, 1982:

"We pledge allegiance to the kosher state of Palestine represented by the PLO, patriotic freedom fighters in the honorable cause of humanity."

The same group regularly inserts advertisements in The New York Times attacking the existence of Israel, and on March 3, 1989, the Israeli newspaper Davar carried a picture of one of the group's leaders visiting Arabs wounded in the uprising against Israel. He handed out $12,000 to various wounded Arabs and presented the Moslem Red Crescent (the equivalent of the Red Cross) $3,000 for the intifada "victims." Each Arab received a bag of sweets along with a personal letter wishing him a speedy recovery.

All of the above share a common denominator: Jews attacking the Jewish state, Judah fighting against Jerusalem. But one group differs radically from all the others. While all the others are secular, generally leftist Jews, the latter is an Orthodox one -- Neturei Karta.

And while much fire and brimstone has been poured on the heads of Lerner and Arens and all the other secular and leftist Jews, there has been an unconscionable failure on the part of religious Jews to speak out against the traitors and enemies of both Israel and the Jewish people who call themselves Neturei Karta. That is inexcusable.

Let me make it quite clear that it is totally legitimate for one to be an anti-Zionist and to disagree with the fundamental concept of a Jewish state in our times, because of religious reasons. There is certainly source material for that position in Torah sources, even though those who use it to deny the legitimate halachic status of Israel are, I believe, very very wrong. I believe that the Jewish state is G-d's hand, that the well known "oaths" in Tractace Ketubot that are used to deny the right to a Jewish state until the coming of the Messiah are interpreted totally wrong and that Religious Zionism is not only proper, but mandatory and obligatory.

Nevertheless, I certainly recognize the right of Jews to religiously differ, though wrong. That is not why I feel that Jews should rise up in anger at Neturei Karta and use all means necessary to punish them. It is not their anti-Zionism which is criminal and which places them beyond the pale. It is rather the fact that they openly support the enemies of the Jewish people, the murderous and vicious Arab Nazis of the PLO, that places the Neturei Karta outside the Jewish camp.

There is a red line in Judaism that cannot be crossed without becoming a traitor to and enemy of the Jewish people. There is a limit that, once reached and violated, marks one as a moser, an informer, and a rodef, a pursuer of Jews, who is plotting to destroy them. That line and limit is the joining together, openly and eagerly and without shame with the enemy who wishes to harm and destroy Jews. Neturei Karta has become the enemy within the Jewish camp, the moser and rodef that should be dealt with in all the ways that are necessary.

It does not matter that they comprise a handful. Their insignificant numbers are unimportant. The substantive nature of their treachery and Hillul Hashem, desecration of the Name, are what matter.

In their obscene words and actions on behalf of the PLO Nazis, do they differ from those leftist Israelis who meet with and support the PLO? In their open support to the Hitlerite Arabs, are they different from Yigal Arens, or Noam Chomsky, or Lenny Brenner or the other disturbed leftist Jews who aid the destruction of Israel? Is venom against Jews and hatred of the Jewish State somehow mitigated because the individual has a beard? Do payot (earlocks) and a long black coat cover the treacherous nakedness of the moser and rodef? Does someone who joins hands, literally, with those who would massacre Jews become more legitimate because he covers his abomination with the mantle of the "Torah"?

I do not think so. I know that there is no difference except that the so-called religious Jew, in addition to his teacher, also desecrates the name of G-d and his Torah. Jewish silence, religious Jewish silence, is inexcusable. The time is long overdue for unified Torah condemnation of Neturei Karta and the same kind of action against them that we would deem proper for those traitors who walk around beardless. After all, many is the "religious" Jew whose beard merely covers an unshaven face, and whose piety is but a fig leaf for the same diseased soul as that which possesses all the traitors on the left.

Sergio Tessa can be reached at Hadar-Israel@verizon.net.

To Go To Top

IN HINDSIGHT, CARTER BOOK SEEN AS PART OF AN AWKWARD PATTERN
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 10, 2007.

Jimmy Carter Give Us Ample Reasons To Wonder What Else Is Lurking Down Deep In His Heart

This Op-Ed, by Neal Sher, a New York attorney, previously served as director of the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations and is a former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Jimmy Carter tried to cover SS man Martin Bartesch ironclad documentary evidence of his direct, hands-on role in the Nazi genocide. On Oct. 20, 1943, Bartesch shot to death Max Oschorn, a French Jewish prisoner.

Carter leaves no doubt that he has a problem with Israel and its American Jewish supporters.

His blame-Israel approach through distortion of easily verifiable facts; his whining about the influence of the pro-Israel lobby; and even the whiff of plagiarism have been exposed and are now spread upon the public record for everyone to see and know.

Carter gave his, not so benevolent, sleuth of oil rich Arabs donors something in return for their "contributions." They got exactly what they paid for: an unequivocal stamp of approval from a former U.S. president for their decades of anti-Israel, anti-Semitic ramblings. Carter's book is a diplomatic and public relations dividend that likely will far exceed their investment with him.

NEW YORK, Dec. 26 (JTA) -- It was the spring of 1987 and the Office of Special Investigations, the Justice Department's Nazi prosecution unit, which I headed at the time, was in the midst of one of our most productive and historic periods.

On April 27, as a result of an in-depth OSI investigation and despite resistance at the State Department, Austrian President and former U.N. Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim, who had served as an officer in the Nazi army, was barred from setting foot ever again on U.S. soil.

One week earlier, after eight years of bruising litigation, we deported to the Soviet Union one Karl Linnas, who had been chief of a Nazi concentration camp in Estonia. To do so, we had to outmaneuver concerted attempts to block the deportation by Patrick Buchanan, the Reagan White House's communications director, and my boss, U.S. Attorney General Ed Meese.

A month later, OSI announced the loss of citizenship and removal from the United States of a former Chicago resident. Martin Bartesch admitted to our office and the court that he had voluntarily joined the Waffen SS and had served in the notorious SS Death's Head Division at the Mauthausen concentration camp where, at the hands of Bartesch and his cohorts, many thousands of prisoners were gassed, shot, starved and worked to death. He also confessed to having concealed his service at the infamous camp from U.S. immigration officials.

In Bartesch's case, OSI researchers uncovered ironclad documentary evidence of his direct, hands-on role in the Nazi genocide. Among the SS documents captured by American forces when they liberated Mauthausen was what we described as the Unnatural Death Book, a register of prisoners killed, along with the identity of the SS guard responsible for the murder.

So powerful was this evidence that, in postwar trials conducted by the U.S. military, the book served as the basis for execution or long prison sentences for many identified SS guards.

An entry on Oct. 20, 1943, registers the shooting death of Max Oschorn, a French Jewish prisoner. His murderer was also recorded: SS man Martin Bartesch. It was a most chilling document.

Bartesch's family and "supporters," seeking special relief, launched a campaign to discredit OSI while trying to garner political support. Indeed, OSI received numerous inquiries from members of Congress who had been approached.

After we explained the facts of the case, however, the matter inevitably was dropped; no one urged that Bartesch or his family be accorded any special treatment.

Well, there was one exception -- Jimmy Carter.

In September 1987, after all of the gruesome details of the case had been made public and widely reported in the media, I received a letter sent by Bartesch's daughter to the former president. Citing groups that had been exposed for their anti-Semitism, it was an all-out assault against OSI as unfair, "un-American" and interested only in "vengeance" against innocent family members.

It's axiomatic that the families of every person prosecuted under the criminal or immigration laws are affected and subjected to hardship. It was obvious; I thought to myself, that no reasonable person could genuinely believe that the Bartesch case was worthy of special dispensation.

On the contrary, it would be a perversion of justice to accede to the family's demands and grant Bartesch relief to which no one else would be entitled. Not even the staunchest and most sincere devotee to humanitarian causes could legitimately claim that an SS murderer who deceived authorities to obtain a visa and citizenship was somehow deserving of exceptional treatment.

That's why I was so taken aback by the personal, handwritten note Jimmy Carter sent to me seeking "special consideration" for this Nazi SS murderer. There on the upper-right corner of Bartesch's daughter's letter was a note to me in the former president's handwriting, and with his signature, urging that "in cases such as this, special consideration can be given to the families for humanitarian reasons."

Unlike members of Congress who inquired about the facts, Carter blindly accepted at face value the daughter's self-serving (and disingenuous) assertions.

As disturbing as I found Carter's plea, and although his attempted intervention has always gnawed at me, I chalked it up at the time to a certain naiveté on the part of the former president. But now, in light of Carter's most recent writings and comments, I am left to wonder whether it was I who was naive simply to dismiss his knee-jerk appeal as the instinctive reaction of a well-meaning but misguided humanitarian.

His latest book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid," and his subsequent defense of it, leaves no doubt that Carter has a problem with Israel and its American Jewish supporters. His blame-Israel approach through the distortion of easily verifiable facts; his whining about the influence of the pro-Israel lobby; and even the whiff of plagiarism have been exposed and are now spread upon the public record for all to see.

Kenneth Stein, who resigned his 23-year association with the Carter Center at Emory University, described it this way: Carter's book "is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments."

Some believe that there's a venal element at work. To be sure, Carter and his publisher and editor knew that, if nothing else, the intentionally provocative, misleading and insulting title would be good for sales.

Moreover, Carter and his center appear to care little about how they fill their coffers. After all, among the most generous contributors to the Carter Center -- at least a million dollars each, according to the center's published accountings -- are Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz, best known for having offered $10 million to New York City after the Sept. 11 attacks, an offer that was rejected by then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani after the prince implied that the attacks may have been justified because of U.S. support for Israel; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; the Saudi Fund for Development; and, most interestingly, the Bin Laden Group.

Make no mistake, these are not simply benevolent donors looking for a good cause; they expect something in return. And Carter gave them exactly what they paid for: an unequivocal stamp of approval from a former, if failed, U.S. president for their decades of anti-Israel, anti-Semitic ramblings. It's a diplomatic and public relations dividend that likely will far exceed their investment.

The exposure of Carter's views on Israel and the Jewish lobby has shed a clearer light on his attempt to influence me in the Bartesch case. We know from his own confession that he has had lust in his heart. Unfortunately, he has given us ample reason to wonder what else is lurking there.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Op-Ed: Carter's book is loving criticism
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=17357&intcategoryid=5

Op-Ed: Carter isn't helping
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=17356&intcategoryid=5

Carter meeting can't repair rift
http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=17395&intcategoryid=4

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com. Visit her new blog:
http://ngthinker.typepad.com

To Go To Top

SAY GOODBYE TO EUROPE -- THE MUSLIM TAKEOVER IS UNDER WAY
Posted by Michael Freund, January 10, 2007.

The Muslim takeover of Europe is happening more quickly than people think. In my column below from today's Jerusalem Post (www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467696394&pagename=JPost% 2FJPArticle%2FShowFull), I highlight the demographic decline of traditional Europe and contrast it with the rapid growth of the continent's Muslim population. This trend has far-reaching consequences for the US and Israel, and it is time that our decision-makers start taking it into account as they plan for the future. Comments and feedback may be sent to: letters@jpost.com or to me directly.

If you ever wanted to see Paris or Rome before you die, but haven't had a chance to do so, you might want to hurry. Soon enough, most of what we now think of as Western Europe will be transformed into a branch of the Muslim world, which is sure to make it an even less welcoming place for Americans, Israelis and for Jews.

That, at least, is the unpleasant, yet entirely unavoidable conclusion to be drawn from Europe's headlong demographic drive toward oblivion.

Think I'm exaggerating? Consider a few cold hard facts.

According to a recent report by the Rand Corporation, "Across Europe, birth rates are falling and family sizes are shrinking. The total fertility rate is now less than two children per woman in every member nation in the European Union."

Needless to say, demographers consider a birthrate of 2.1 children per family to be the replacement level at which a society's population size remains stable. Barring large-scale immigration, anything less means decline and dissolution.

A research study published last year in the International Journal of Andrology found a similar trend, concluding that, "Fertility rates have fallen and are now below replacement level in all European Union (EU) Member States. In the 20-year period since 1982," it noted, "most EU Member State countries have had total fertility rates continuously below replacement level."

At the bottom of the list are Spain, Italy and Greece, where birthrates hover around just 1.3 per couple, leading some forecasters to suggest, for example, that Italy's population could shrink by one-third by the middle of the century.

Others, such as Germany's 1.37, the UK's 1.74 and Sweden's 1.75, aren't all much better.

The figures are so bad that in many European countries, the total number of deaths each year has actually begun to exceed the number of births.

Indeed, the Council of Europe's 2004 Demographic Yearbook warned that, "for Europe as a whole, more people died in 2003 than were born." In 1990, said the yearbook, "three countries -- Germany, Bulgaria and Hungary -- had negative natural growth for the first time. By 2002, it was negative in fifteen countries."

LAST YEAR, after the publication of statistics revealing that 30 percent of German women have not had children, Germany's family minister, Ursula von der Leyen, caused a stir when she said that if her nation's birth rate did not turn around, the country would have to "turn out the light." And while Europeans may be busy everywhere but in the bedroom, the Muslim populations in their midst are proving far more expansive.

As columnist Mark Steyn points out in his must-read new book, America Alone, "What's the Muslim population of Rotterdam? Forty percent. What's the most popular baby boy's name in Belgium? Mohammed. In Amsterdam? Mohammed. In Malmo, Sweden? Mohammed."

Last month, the UK Daily Telegraph reported that, "Mohammed, and its most common alternative spelling Muhammad, are now more popular babies' names in England and Wales than George."

This, said the paper, using typically British understatement, "reflects the diverse ethnic mix of the population."

But that "mix," so to speak, is rapidly changing -- and not in traditional Europe's favor.

ISLAM, BY all accounts, is the fastest growing religion in Europe, spurred by immigration and high fertility rates. According to projections by the US federal government's National Intelligence Council, the continent's current Muslim population of 20 million will likely double by 2025.

And as Bruce Bawer noted last year in While Europe Slept, "Already, in most of Western Europe, 16 to 20 percent of children are Muslims...within a couple of generations many [European] countries will have Muslim majorities."

Not since September 8, 1683, when the Ottomans were threatening to breach the walls of Vienna, has Islam been so perilously close to seizing control over Western Europe.

The implications of all this are far graver than we can even begin to imagine, and it is not just a matter of choosing new and more hospitable tourist destinations.

An increasingly Islamified Europe will prove ever more hostile to Israel and America, and this trend will only intensify as the Muslim population there continues to grow.

Even if European governments succeed in reversing the curve, which seems highly unlikely, it will be decades before it would begin to be felt. In the meantime, however, Muslim political power on the continent will develop and expand, and European leaders will be hard-pressed to ignore their demands.

This makes it far less likely that Israel and the US can count on Europe -- if they ever really could -- at times of crisis in the decades ahead. Just pick an issue, from the war on terror to Palestinian statehood, and you'll see what I mean.

For however unbalanced Europe's stance has been until now, it will likely only grow worse in the years to come.

Europe as we know it is a thing of the past, and it is time for Israeli and American decision-makers to take this into account as they plan for the future. The face of Europe is changing rapidly, and with it the continent's social and political make-up.

So if you really want to see the Eiffel Tower up close, you had best not delay. Before you know it, it might just turn into a minaret.

To Go To Top

TESHUVA MOVEMENT
Posted by Lee Caplan, January 9, 2007.

The email below by Shaul Behr (sbehr@sabreton.com) is one of the best things I have ever read, and the reply by Yocheved is also right on the mark! Contact Yocheved Golani at yocheved@yochevedgolani.com. This email was distributed by OhaveiEretzYisrael@yahoogroups.com

Original message by Shaul Behr

Lashing out at a stick

I haven't lived in Israel for long -- not yet 5 years -- but from what I am reading and sensing around me, I would venture to say that in the history of the State of Israel, public morale has never, ever been as low as it is now. I don't need to rehash what all the talking heads are saying about lack of trust in any public institutions, from the Knesset to the judiciary, to the enforcers of the law, to the civil service -- there is not a single stone in the edifice of the state that is untainted by utterly brazen filth, corruption, and incompetence, if not outright evil. We have reached such a level of despair that we have even given up on trying to change our government -- because the trend is such that we would only get an even worse one in its place, if such a thing can be believed possible.

In truth, not everyone has despaired. On either fringe of the political spectrum are those who are still energized for their cause. On the Left, the Beilins and the Sarids are still deliriously hyping their hallucinatory visions of Peace In Our Time, and just as "even on the threshold of Gehinnom the wicked do not repent", they will continue to insist, to the minute that the last Jew is C"V exterminated from the Land of Israel, that the Arabs really just want to settle down next to us with little white picket fences, if only we would stop being so horrible to them. I have no interest in these people; they are a lost cause and not worth spending any energy on.

On the other end of the spectrum is the Religious Right / "Orange" camp (of which I count myself a member). Morale-wise, we all took a big hit from the Disengagement, which led to a lot of despair. The Disengagement was a shameful display of reactiveness, naivety and messianic attachment to the "holiness" of the State, but things appear to have been turning a corner since then. Firstly, Amona demonstrated what I believe is an important point -- that the instruments of the State of Israel are not by any means holy, and that some things are worth fighting for, even against the erstwhile "holy" State. Then, more recently, the ascent to Chomesh showed a tremendous sea change -- instead of being reactive and just demonstrating against unjust policies, the Orange camp showed itself to be proactive, and able to set the agenda. And last week -- whether or not it was a good idea, the march on Tzurif was again a proactive move, which to my mind is at least an encouraging sign. And of course, lurking in the background is the dark horse of Moshe Feiglin, who is increasingly giving Bibi Netanyahu chills in his sleep, and giving the rest of us some hope to hang on to that there might be someone capable of taking over the reins of power in a responsible, Jewish way.

All this activity is well and good -- but I have this nagging sensation that something very big is missing from all this hishtadlus.

G-d.

Whoa. That's a heavy accusation. After all, is our faith not the unifying force that motivates us and gives us our core belief systems, for which we are unquestionably so willing to be moser nefesh? No question about that. And we all know that our faith requires us to put in hishtadlus in order to achieve our righteous goals. But IMHO, the application of that required hishtadlus is being done in a way of naivety and childishly weak hashkafa.

Here's an analogy: imagine a man play-attacking his dog with a rubber stick. He bops the animal on the head, then on the nose, taunting the dog into a frenzy. Then he lets the dog bite the stick, and the animal savages it with all its canine fury. The stick is now neutralized, and the dog proudly displays and chews on his trophy, thinking how clever and strong he is that he beat that mean old stick.

So here in the Middle East, we have, oh, about 400 million Arabs, a significant portion of whom have no greater desire than to see us all dead. Whether through grinding terrorism and despair, or in one blinding flash of atomic glory, our enemies are making absolutely no secret of their intentions for us. And what are we doing? Marching on Arab towns to try put them in their place? Calling for greater military action against Gaza? Threatening pre-emptive nuclear strikes on Iran? Guys, in the Olam Hateva, these are all the right noises to make -- but we, as the people of faith, Am Yisrael -- we should know better than that! Do you really think that's what Hashem wants from us -- just that we should flex our muscles a bit more against the Arabs and the Olmerts -- and then He will take away all our troubles? We are just like that dog, snapping at the stick, and not getting the message that the Wielder of that stick is sending us.

We have a very good precedent for our times in Tanach: Megillas Ester. Rav Elchonon Wasserman HY"D analyzed the difference between the Jewish responses to Haman and Antiochus respectively. There are two types of troubles that come on Am Yisrael, says R' Elchonon: "maaseh Hashem" and "maaseh Satan". Maaseh Hashem is when the trouble comes in the form of a threat to the physical well-being of Yisrael; it is a slap on the wrist; a wake-up call from Hashem that our house is not in order, and we need to do teshuva. Maaseh Satan is when the trouble is in the form of a threat to our spiritual well-being, with oppressive decrees aimed at weakening our connection to Hashem and His Torah. For maaseh Satan, to be sure, one has to daven and do teshuva -- but the ikkar avoda is mesirus nefesh, going to war, fighting and dying for the cause if need be. Thus the Chashmonaim took up arms against the evil decrees of Antiochus -- but Mordechai and Ester did nothing other than proclaim three days of fasting and teshuva. There was no point organizing a military response or attempting to assassinate Haman; the decree was from Hashem, and any hishtadlus spent on trying to "lash out at the stick" would have been utterly futile and counterproductive. Only once Hashem had accepted Am Yisrael's teshuva, made the tables turn, and the decree was effectively cancelled, did military action become an option.

Folks, I really feel that bombastic proclamations and vigilante actions, no matter how well planned and coordinated, represent nothing more than a wild outpouring of pent-up frustration and anger, and they will achieve nothing if we fail to take heed of the messages that the Creator is sending us. And those messages are clear -- we hear them every day in the words of our enemies, and see them in the steady, grinding deterioration in Israel's security. There is a gezeira out against us: ISRAEL IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED! It may be Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad whose mouths are forming the words, but that decree is coming straight from Hashem. And we are not going to avert the decree with any attempts to silence the messengers, or by loudly proclaiming our Jewish pride. Are we so small of faith, that we really believe things would change, if only we'd "let the IDF win"? Are we trying to play tricks with G-d, hoping He'll forget about the decree if we just manage to neutralize one or two of His agents?

Guys, it's time to set our hashkafa straight. The only chest thumping we should be doing is a giant collective viduy. The Orange camp should be teaming up with the Black camp, and screaming like Yirmiyahu in the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: AM YISRAEL, WAKE UP! THE ENEMY IS AT THE GATE! Cry out for mercy from Hashem! Search your deeds, do teshuva, come back home!

This is the message we should be splashing in banners across the highways and in full-page spreads in the newspapers. Olmert, Peretz, Assad, Abbas, Ahmadinejad -- they are all irrelevant; they are just the stick with which HKBH is hitting us. If we get our spiritual house in order, Hashem will save us with ease, as He saved us from Haman. And conversely, if Heaven forbid we carry on like we are now, flailing wildly at the "sticks", how can we possibly expect any kind of salvation? Rest assured, until we get the message, Hashem will just keep turning the screws on us.

I believe that the time has never been more opportune for a huge, nationwide Teshuva campaign. The despair into which Israel has sunk might actually be a good thing, inasmuch as it represents a kind of foxhole, in which, as the saying goes, there are no atheists. "You've given up on everything else?" goes the campaign. "Turn to G-d. Strengthen your Jewishness in any way you can. Just take on one mitzvah, perfect it and make it yours, for the sake of all of Israel."

This campaign will need organizers and infrastructure. The existing "Orange" organizations have exactly that, if only they will have the "Rosh Gadol" to recognize that salvation comes only from Hashem, and our collective fate depends entirely on our collective merit. It will take some very clever spin, but I believe the Black camp can and should also be brought onside. Any ideas as to how to do that will be much appreciated.

I think it would be most appropriate if the most likely pretender to the throne, Moshe Feiglin, would lead it himself. A real Jewish leader needs to be able to inspire his nation to teshuva. Part of their teshuva could be as simple as voting for him instead of the rest of those godless scumbags currently on display in the Knesset. If such a campaign were to take hold, we will have proven ourselves worthy of salvation. If Feiglin -- or anyone else -- can successfully lead such a campaign, then he will have proved himself worthy of the mantle of true Jewish Leadership. Chadeish yameinu kekedem.

I will add one little postscript, and that is to note where mesirus nefesh, is really called for. As R' Elchonon said with reference to the Chashmonaim, they were fighting "maaseh Satan", decrees against the Torah, not decrees against the physical bodies of the Jews. It behooves us all to put a little thought into considering exactly who is making decrees against the Torah today, and what an appropriate response might be from the People of Faith. Reply by Yocheved Golani

Amen.

Several listmates have been busy behind the scenes, trying to effect HaShem's mercy with tefilot. Shaul is right. We SHOULD join in tefila en masse.

I am willing to coordinate more future trips to the Kotel Katan. All I need are firm commitments with non-refundable pre-payment so that I can pay the hired driver without taking another loss due to no-shows.

Let's FLOOD the Kotel Katan area with the tears, and the tefilot of Jews begging for mercy. The spillover crowd can fill the Kotel Maaravi plaza.

Notify me that YOU are booked for the trips.

A shofar disturbed the hostile neighbors? They ain't heard nuthin' yet.

Who's going to split the Heavens with me?

Yocheved

Contact Lee Caplan at leescaplan@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

SAUDI ARABIA RIDIMENSIONATO
Posted by Michael Travis, January 9, 2007.

Why has the American government not read Saudi Arabia the riot act? Why haven't the hate-filled pamphlets collected at mosques around the country that were built and are now maintained by Saudi money brought together by Rice or Bush and put out on a table at the White House? And then the Arab ambassadors could all be invited over to see this "Special Exhibit," an exhibit to which representatives of all the major networks and the major newspapers here and abroad will be invited and urged to cover?

And then why does Bush or someone else not have a little private meeting with the enraged Saudi Ambassador, to tell him that there is much more in that sort of "Special Exhibit" -- which could of course tour the country -- if he doesn't stop funding the mosques and madrasas in this country, and stop allowing Saudi money to pay for Muslim missionaries in the prisons, to prey on the psychically as well as economically marginal.

If the American government had a mind to do it, it could bring the Saudi government around in no time.

But it doesn't, because so many former government officials and those who listen to them are directly or indirectly on the Saudi or other Muslim dole. Who pays Eugene Bird, and pays for the ads of the "Council for the National Interest" that is virtually identical in its views to the Saudi government? Who pays for "consultancy" by Raymond Close, or James Akins? Who pays for that magazine about the Middle East, full of Arab propaganda, that another ex-diplomat, Andrew Kilgore, runs? Who pays or has paid fees to Brent Scowcroft? To George McGovern? What Presidential libraries have been battening on Saudi and other Arab money? Who has received those million-dollar lecture fees in Kuwait, or from that Arab-funded lectureship at the Fletcher School (hint: Bush, Clinton)? Who has been getting what?

Ask yourself why since 1973 there has been not a move toward decreasing, through the simple device of taxes, demand for oil and gasoline? Why for thirty years did American energy policy consist of trusting "our staunch ally Saudi Arabia" to keep prices low, when it never happened, and never could have happened? Why was no one aware until the last year or two of what, inevitably, OPEC oil revenues would fund? Why was Prince Bandar the only foreigner allowed in on the plans for invading Iraq? Why today do we worry about what the Sunni Arabs want, and believe that we have a duty to remain in Iraq to protect those Sunnis (i.e., keep the "catastrophe of civil war" from happening)?

And that is just the beginning of the list of questions that need to be asked.

Meanwhile, as long as the Saudi "royal" family (self-anointed monarchs since they defeated the Jabal Shammar in 1920, or soon thereafter) exists, and appropriates most of the nation's wealth, there will be those who will as Muslims find their resentment and outraged channeled into Islam as the total explanation of everything. And terrorism will continue in Saudi Arabia until the end of time. Let it. The only business the Infidel world should have with Saudi Arabia is to attempt to have as little business with Saudi Arabia.

For the moment great sums of money flow in, and they will continue to flow in. But this does not mean that every effort cannot be made to diminish that flow of money (instead of aiming at a ludicrously irrelevant "energy independence" for the United States, which is both unachievable and would have no effect on Saudi Arabia or other Muslim oil states, for oil not sold to America will simply be sold to others, unless collective demand goes down).

Saudi Arabia needs to be "ridimensionato" -- that is to say, cut down to size. "Money can buy everything -- except civilization." It is a barbarous place; its government is barbarous, its economy barbarous, the mental state of its inhabitants barbarous. A very few, who have spent a long time in the West, can appear to have acquired the habits of thought of Western man. And a very few of those may actually manage to do so. But no one should be fooled by the oleaginous new ambassador, Al-Jubeir.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

THE PUBLIC, TOO, WAS IN A COMA
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 9, 2007.

The hiding of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's deteriorating health which obviously affected his thinking was a well-kept secret, not only by his Cabinet but the Leftist Press who wanted him to stay in power once he adopted their doctrine of de-Judaizing the Jewish State of Israel and abandoning the Land to the Arab Muslims.

Ehud Olmert was clearly a great influence as he observed Sharon's deteriorating health with all the earmarks of dementia.

The Leftist Media protected Sharon as they are protecting Olmert today.

As long as Olmert follows his stated plan of divesting Israel of Judea, Samaria, the Golan Heights, the Jordan Valley and Eastern Jerusalem the Leftist Media will pump out stories to keep him in power, much as they did with Sharon. They managed to hide and obscure the crookery of Sharon and his sons. Now they have thrown a shield around Olmert's crookery.

This was written by Aluf Benn and it appeared in Haaretz (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/809726.html) January 5, 2007.

In his last year as prime minister, during which he spearheaded the disengagement from the Gaza Strip and the "big bang" on the political map, Ariel Sharon showed increasing signs of physical deterioration. He had difficulty walking, tired quickly and told his close associates that his vitality was no longer as it used to be. His aides tried to make things easier for him, to spare him physical effort and to keep his schedule light so that he would be able to rest.

At events to which Sharon was invited the distances were carefully measured so that he would have to walk as little as possible. On his last trip abroad, to the United Nations General Assembly in September, 2005, his people counted the steps between the conference rooms where he met with world leaders and made sure that he would not have to climb stairs. When he dined at the residence of the British ambassador, Simon McDonald, Sharon had to walk 64 meters, as measured by the bodyguards, and arrived panting and out of breath.

On Sundays, before cabinet meetings, the prime minister and other ministers pass in front of a battery of photographers. During his first years as prime minister, Sharon would ascend the staircase from his bureau to the meeting room and cross the corridor with confident steps and a determined expression. During his last year, he was brought up to the meetings in a small elevator, and the short walk in front of the cameras became an increasing challenge.

"The decline wasn't obvious in the big decisions," says a senior official who participated in many discussions with Sharon. "His wit, his humor, his conviction and his determination remained until the last meeting that he conducted, which dealt with the village of Maghar, on the day he collapsed. And he was a good politician -- he knew where to use harmless deception and how to fudge things, when a meeting was important and whether he could relate anecdotes for an hour and a half. But toward the end, he went into less detail and stuck much closer to the points and the summaries that had been written for him. In the beginning I never saw him fall asleep at meetings, and at the end I did. And the difficulty in walking increased, and this was obvious."

Former Knesset Foreign Relations and Defense Committee chairman Likud MK Yuval Steinitz was the only one who spoke publicly about Sharon's decline. In an interview with Haaretz's Ari Shavit last April, Steinitz related that during Sharon's last nine months as prime minister, "there was a marked change. It didn't reach a situation of disability, but Sharon needed his aides and his papers and texts that were prepared for him in advance. It hadn't been that way before. There was an obvious decline in his functioning." Prior to that, said Steinitz, Sharon's appearances in his committee "had been virtuoso."

UNQUESTIONED LEADERSHIP

The information concerning Sharon's physical difficulties was concealed from the media and the public. Only after he sank into a coma, exactly one year ago, did the details begin to trickle out in conversations with people who worked with him closely and participated in meetings that he ran. This was not an attempt to identify in retrospect early signs of his collapse. It emerges that his aides were aware of his problems and discussed this among themselves even while he was serving as prime minister. They do not deny the details -- the tiredness, the difficulty in walking and breathing, the increasing need for prepared notes and summaries of meetings. But according to them, his intellectual prowess was not affected, nor was his ability to make decisions and lead. No one questioned his leadership and his total control of the country up until his last minute as prime minister. There is also no knowledge of warning signs that could have predicted the stroke he suffered on December 18, 2005, two weeks before he finally collapsed from a cerebral hemorrhage, when his term as prime minister ended suddenly.

Sharon's case has shown that the health of national leaders is not just a personal matter, but rather the concern of the entire public. There is no doubt that his departure was a political and historical turning point. However, insofar as is known, he did not suffer from a "leaders' disease" that was concealed from the citizens of Israel. He did not undergo any medical treatment in secret nor did he suffer from cancer and heart ailments like Levi Eshkol, Golda Meir and Menachem Begin.

His personal physicians, Dr. Shlomo Segev and Prof. Bolek Goldman, risked their professional prestige when they declared that "Sharon is healthy" in an interview to the mass-circulation daily Yediot Ahronot just a few days before he collapsed. According to them, their periodic checkups did not show anything unusual, apart from excess weight. They were not asked about the physical difficulties that were causing concern in Sharon's immediate environment, and they did not speak about them. They also minimized his limp and the lameness in one leg. The blood-vessel disorder in Sharon's brain was discovered only after he was hospitalized.

Nor was Sharon himself worried about his health. On the contrary: According to all evidence, he believed that he would live to a ripe old age like his grandmother and his aunt, about whom he would speak a lot. He had no doubt that he would be elected for another four-year term and afterward retire to his ranch "to ride the horses." A close aide says that Sharon considered serving for another two years and then finding someone he could trust as his replacement. Perhaps Tzipi Livni (now foreign minister), whom he brought quite close toward the end of his term and whom he helped advance up the ladder of ministerial roles. "We thought that we had to make things easier for him, because we wanted to protect him," relates the aide. "We all have a father or a grandfather his age. We wanted him to deal only with the major issues, and not to go to superfluous and stupid events and to be at home more. So he could rest. But not because of health problems. He had more colds and lost his voice, but he didn't have health problems. And he didn't want people to make things easier for him."

During the period that preceded the disengagement, Sharon canceled most outings from his bureau and infrequently participated in events. The explanation that was given to the media had to do with security: The bodyguards feared that people from the right who opposed the evacuation of the settlements would try to harm the prime minister. His aides say that this was indeed the reason he shut himself up in the bureau -- and not the state of his health or his physical fatigue. At that time Sharon also asked to cut back his schedule.

PROBLEMATIC CIRCUMSTANCES

One aide insists to this day that Sharon's collapse was a tragedy of problematic coincidences. The first stroke affected him in his office, before he set out for home, to Sycamore Ranch. Had he suffered it at night, in his home, the blood clot would have dissolved and no one would have noticed anything. There would have been no invasive examinations, the doctors would not have discovered the hole in his heart and would not have scheduled a catheterization and injected him with blood thinners, which caused the second, serious stroke. Had it not been for this chain of events, perhaps Sharon could have lead the country to this day.

This aide relates that during the last year, he suffered from sharp pains in one of his legs, in which he had been wounded in the battle for Latrun in 1948. His limp worsened and he panted a lot. When he came to work he would sit down in the chair in his bureau; he did not wander among the rooms like his successor, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. But, "particularly on the trip to the UN, Sharon walked more than on other trips, and they always measured his steps for him."

The aide says that in meetings and discussions as well, Sharon would fall asleep a lot less than other ministers, and his tiredness stemmed from problems in falling asleep at night. "There's no doubt that he was five years older than he was on the day he was elected, but not for a moment did I think that we were hiding the truth about the state of his health or, alternatively, that a thing like that would happen," he sums up.

According to the same source, the period when Sharon worried him was after his victory in the 2003 elections. "He was in a kind of downer, not clinical depression. He was moody, as though he had won the elections and now there wasn't anything new, and he was bored with the job. We said that he was really in a depression, and at that stage he started sleeping more and more at the ranch and we stopped the afternoon nap in Jerusalem."

During his first term, Sharon would rest in the afternoon at his official residence in the Rehavia neighborhood and sleep there several times a week. In his second term, his agenda went on without a break until the evening and then he would leave for Sycamore Ranch. Sharon emerged from the crisis and found a new direction only at the end of 2003, when he decided to withdraw from the Gaza Strip.

In retrospect, it is clear that the medical statistics were working against Sharon. He was the most elderly prime minister in the history of Israel, even more so than "the Old Man" -- David Ben-Gurion. His excess weight was also obvious. Were his belief in his own longevity and his close circle's insistence on protecting him and expecting him to be able to serve for several more years mere wishes or reasonable expectations in the circumstances? It is a fact, say his aides, that he is continuing to live even in the hospital, a year after a serious stroke and complex brain surgery.

The people close to Sharon knew that the state of his health was a charged political issue that was liable to work to his detriment him in contending with younger politicians, such as Benjamin Netanyahu. In the 2001 election race, Ehud Barak's campaign headquarters made a failed attempt to bring up "Arik's illnesses" for media discussion, but the story did not catch on in the absence of any real evidence. In the 2003 campaign there was talk of corruption and investigations, but not of illnesses. However, as the 2006 elections drew near the issue of the prime minister's health reared its head again.

THE LAST INTERVIEW

In April, 2005, before Passover, I went with my colleague Yossi Verter for a holiday interview with the prime minister. We did not know then that this would be the last interview with him. These

meetings with Sharon were every journalist's nightmare: He prepared himself well for the questions and stuck to the points he had prepared in advance. How can we get him away from those pages, we asked ourselves, and we decided to bring up the health issue. There are elections soon, and he is no longer young. Maybe we'll succeed in catching him unprepared on a sensitive point.

But Sharon knew these questions and immediately pulled out his prepared answer: "I invite you to see my medical report. This could have a bad effect on other people's health." We accepted the challenge and asked to see the file. Sharon had not expected this: "In fact for me this would be quite convenient," he said. "I don't know how this is done." We insisted, and Sharon moved in his chair and turned to his spokesman Assaf Shariv. "Ah, how do we do this? Are there rules?" "We'll definitely check," replied Shariv. In an attempt to avoid embarrassment, Sharon declared: "I'd like to but it's just not the usual thing to do here. Maybe you can ask ..."

With this the matter ended. The rules were not found and the medical file was revealed, at least partially, only after Sharon's first stroke, when the people around him tried to show that he was healthy, fit to serve and be reelected.

A few months later I wrote an article about Sharon's health as an important issue in the approaching elections. I had no information about illnesses or difficulties, only an assessment that a man of his age is no longer at his best. At his bureau they said to me: "It's good that you're writing about this now, way before the campaign. This way they won't bother us later on." At the last press conference that Sharon held, about two weeks before the first stroke, he related jokingly to his advanced age and said: "In four months I'll be 78. This is the best age to move forward." (The name of the new party he had founded, Kadima, means "forward.") He stood there then and answered questions fluently for an hour and a half, and among the reporters there was amazed whispering that he was completely lucid. But the very fact of the discussion of Sharon's lucidity shows that his advanced age was indeed a cause for concern. No one, after all, raises this question regarding Olmert, Netanyahu or Barak.

It is difficult to know whether Sharon's physical hardships had a detrimental effect on the quality of his functioning as leader of the country or on the quality of the decisions he made, or whether he was more dependent on his sons, his close associates and the people of his bureau than he had been in the past. There is no doubt that up until the last minute the state of his health was of supreme importance to the country's future and that his sudden collapse sent all systems into a tailspin.

The lesson has not been learned: A year after Sharon's departure, there are still no compulsory rules for the reporting and supervision of the health of Israel's leaders, nor for a compulsory age for retirement from the position of prime minister, as there is for civil servants and judges.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

THE ARAB STATES DRIFT INTO IRRELEVANCE (CHALLENGED BY NEW NON STATE PLAYERS)
Posted by Avodah 15, January 9, 2007.

This was written by Rami G. Khouri and it appeared in Daily Star-Lebanon (www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=5&article_id=78281)

The most striking transformation taking place throughout the Middle East is that the new regional security architecture gradually emerging in the Arab world seems to be managed almost totally by non-Arab parties: Iran, Turkey, Israel, the U.S., and now Ethiopia. It is possible that the Arabs could write themselves out of their own history, ending up as mere consumers of foreign goods, proxies for foreign powers, and spectators in the game of defining their own identity, security, and destiny. This would be a demeaning cap after a century of repeated incompetence in the field of Arab security and statehood.

Two other major trends define the region. Traditional major Arab powers like Egypt and Saudi Arabia, as well as lesser ones like Syria, Jordan, Libya, Algeria and Morocco, are less influential and interventionist regionally than they used to be. In many cases they also suffer greater dissent and even some stressed legitimacy at home. At the same time,in the Arab world now challenge, work alongside, or even replace long-serving regimes; the most noteworthy examples are Hizbullah, Hamas, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, the Badr and Mehdi militias in Iraq, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and, most recently, the Union of Islamic Courts in Somalia.

Contact Avodah 15 at avodah15@aol.com

To Go To Top

EGYPTIAN WEEKLY ROZ AL-YOUSEF: BUSH SHOULD BE EXECUTED
Posted by Professor Eugene Narrett, January 9, 2007.

From the papers of America's "Moderate Arab ally," Egypt, armed to the teeth by American politicians. It was translated by Memri. To view this Special Dispatch in HTML, visit: http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD141607 And visit the Memri blog: http://www.thememriblog.org/

Special Dispatch-Egypt, January 9, 2007, No. 1416 Egyptian Weekly Roz Al-Yousef: Bush Should Be Executed

On the cover of its January 6, 2007 issue, the mainstream Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Yousef featured a manipulated photo of Saddam Hussein's execution, in which Saddam's head was replaced with that of U.S. President George W. Bush. The photo was titled "Bush's Execution."

Inside the issue was an article of the same title, by Shafiq Ahmad 'Ali, accompanied by the photo and calling on the Americans to execute their president for the murder of Iraqi civilians and "as a true measure of justice, revenge and democracy."

The following are excerpts from the article:(1) If Saddam Was Executed for the Murder of 148 Iraqi Citizens, How Many Times Must Bush Be Executed? "Saddam Hussein was executed for the murder of 148 Iraqis. Do you know how many Iraqi citizens have been murdered, by Bush's own admission, as a result of the American invasion?... A total of 30,000, according to a report in [the Egyptian government daily] Al-Ahram on December 13, 2005. So how many times must Bush be executed for all those murders and for the ones he is still committing...? "Moreover, he executed [Iraqi] President Saddam Hussein on 'Eid Al-Adha, so he could boast that he had murdered an Arab Muslim president on a Muslim holiday. In his boastfulness, boldness and moral depravity, he also called Saddam's execution 'a step towards democracy.' "We indeed need a real step in this direction. In other words, we need Bush himself executed, as a true measure of justice, revenge and democracy. Worthy American citizens... I am not appealing to the murderers, thieves, invaders, occupiers, liars, and racists among you, or to those who have undertaken to serve as agents of Israel. I am appealing only to the honorable and conscientious [people] among you, explaining why we are asking you to execute Bush himself... "After the American invasion of Iraq, [America's] lie [to the U.N. Security Council] was exposed [when] nobody could find the alleged weapons [of mass destruction]. In spite of this, Bush has not yet been brought before a tribunal for war criminals, which would punish him for his great lie and for the calamities that consequently befell Iraq and its people, whom Bush so vehemently promised to protect before the invasion. He was so sincere [in his promise] that the number of Iraqi civilians killed by Bush so far comes to 30,000 innocent men women and children, by [his own] admission...

"Isn't the murder of so many innocent Iraqis enough [of a basis] for putting Bush on trial? If not, then how many Iraqi women and children must die in order for Bush to be brought before a tribunal for war criminals?... Regardless of whether the number of dead among innocent Iraqi civilians is 30,000, as Bush himself has said with his big mouth, or 665,000, as the American [Johns] Hopkins University reported, or 794,000, as the expert David Rush reported, the important question at present is [still] this: if Saddam Hussein was executed for the murder of 148 Iraqi citizens, how many times should Bush be executed for having murdered all these sons of the Iraqi people?" Endnote: (1) Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt) January 1, 2007.

Contact Professor Narrett at culturtalk@aol.com

To Go To Top

A "EUROCENTRIC" JEWISH HISTORY
Posted by Sergio Tessa (HaDaR), January 9, 2007.

The following article by the secularIST Israeli daily Yedioth Acharonoth touches only the tip of the iceberg of a major distortion in the Jewish world. It was written by Yaniv Halili, New York correspondent of Yedioth Ahronoth, and is called "History Lesson." It is archived at
www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/ 1,2506,L-3349658,00.html

The total ignorance of non-European Jews' incredibly rich history, and of almost everything relating to the so-called "oriental" (Mizrachi) Jews, that is the Jews of Iraq, Persia, Yemen, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria -- which are the most ancient Jewish Communities in the world, is accompanied by the total ignorance of their ancient traditions, practices, rituals, attitudes and Torah Jurisprudence. All this has been fostered by the "eurocentric" state educational system in Israel, but also by the world of religious schools and rabbinical colleges (yeshivas, yeshivoth), which has been dominated by the very often restrictive and "new" European traditions, and in which non European Jewish tradition and Jurisprudence have been practically ignored.

Just as an example, there isn't yet a complete version (only one volume is available) of the Code of Jewish Law (Shulchan Arukh), written by Rabbi Yosef Caro, certainly NOT an Ashkenazi, that has been printed with the comments and the jurisprudence of Posqim from the places mentioned above, who are the great majority, and according to whose responsa non European Jews have behaved for centuries, but whose writings remain almost esoteric material because they are difficult to come upon, in spite of the efforts made in the last few years in the non Ashkenazi world, and whose comments and annotations are NOT printed in every copy of the Shulchan Arukh, as is done with the commentaries and decisions of Ashkenazi Posqim, i.e. the Maghen Avraham, just to mention one.

What will it take to redress this wrong and to re-establish some balance in the Jewish world?

sergio HaDaR tezza

Why didn't I know about the Crypto-Jews of Mashhad who had to choose between conversion to Islam and death? Because of the Ashkenazi bleeding hearts, that's why

Even when I was young, I enjoyed history. I was able to remember dates by heart, and I don't mean my friends' birthdays. I could tell you when the First Zionist Congress occurred or when the First Aliyah began. Nordau and Arlozorov were more than just street names for me, and, unlike a significant percentage of my classmates, I could differentiate between Hitler and Herzl.

In short, I considered myself to be somewhat of a history buff. No one could stump me. Until I enlisted in the army, that is.

It all began rather innocuously. One of the base clerks, who suspected that I may be Druze or, God forbid, Arab, asked me about the origin of my last name. I rushed to assure her that she could relax. My family's roots go back to Iran, which may be a radical Islamic state but at least it's not an Arab one.

"Don't worry," I soothed the earnest pencil warrior. "My mother wore a veil as a child, but she didn't speak Arabic -- only Farsi. Oh, and she makes the world's best gundi."

But the clerk persisted. "If your origins are Persian," she queried, "why do you have an Arabic name? Where does the name come from?"

Busted! The clerk's innocent question revealed my ignorance, and I had nothing to say in response. The more I thought about it, the more I realized that I knew nothing about my roots.

Who am I?

Where did my parents come from? What was the origin of their last name? How did their families get to Iran? These and other questions troubled me. It turned out that while I had been busy learning about the history of Zionism, I had completely ignored my own private history.

But something was still missing. History, after all, is first studied in school, and I wondered why I had learned neither about Iranian Jewry nor about the Jews of the other Moslem countries.

As if to emphasize the point, during that same period, I happened to catch an exhibit entitled "Nine out of Four Hundred," which included a 400-page high school history textbook. Nine of the pages were clipped together, separated and isolated from the rest. These nine pages were the only ones that discussed the Mizrachi (Oriental) Jews who came from Muslim countries.

Thus, no one taught me about the Crypto-Jews of Mashhad, Iran, who, in 1839, were coerced to choose between conversion to Islam and death.

Mashhad's ruler had ordered his men to enter the Jewish homes. With knives held to their throats, the Jewish patriarchs were forced to vocally proclaim their allegiance to Mohammed's religion.

The Jews then began living a double life. On the outside, they acted as Muslims; their clothes, names, and lifestyles resembled those of their Iranian neighbors. At home, however, they secretly taught their children to read Hebrew, lit candles, and welcomed the Shabbat.

And so, my ancestors had to accept a new last name, which came down through the generations to me. I am proud to carry this name, as testimony to the horrible pogrom in Mashhad.

How come?

But, as I noted, I didn't know any of this. How could I have? The Israeli education system emphasized that immigrants of the Fourth Aliyah tended their gardens in Jerusalem's Rehavia neighborhood and introduced me to the sages of Lublin. But no mention was made about Iranian Jewry, considered to be the most ancient Jewish community in the world.

Providentially, over the years, I've managed to fill in the gaps in my knowledge on my own. Nevertheless, it still rankles that Mizrachi culture and history are considerably marginalized in Israel.

Except for two or three token poems by Ibn Gabirol, no works by Mizrachi writers are included in the school literature curriculum. Four years ago, then Education Ministry General-Manager Ronit Tirosh suggested that a third of the curriculum be comprised of Mizrachi works. She was promptly and loudly slammed for being a populist.

Yet, the most convincing argument was offered by several bleeding hearts, who decreed that the curriculum should be determined by quality and not quantity. The fact that one can easily identify numerous quality Mizrachi literary works did not concern these pundits.

Even more surprising was the fervor with which these same compassionate liberals strove to add poems by Palestinian writers, such as Mahmoud Darwish, to the curriculum. As always, the leftist Ashkenazim prostrate themselves before the Palestinians, while recoiling in horror from Mizrachi culture, which may -- Heaven forbid! -- linger on their clothes like the scent of some exotic Mizrachi spice.

My detractors will dismiss all this as mere nonsensical paranoia. They'll note that these days, "everyone" listens to Sarit Hadad on the radio and eats hummus in restaurants.

Because, of course, Sarit Hadad's music and hummus are the epitome of Mizrachi culture. Since both figure prominently at modern weddings, Mizrachi culture is clearly well-represented in Israel.

I once asked a Yad Vashem director to explain why no one talks about the fates of Libyan, Tunisian and Greek Jewry when discussing the Holocaust. After hemming and hawing, he reminded me that the public does know a thing or two about Greek Jewry (thanks to Yehuda Poliker).

He then added that the bottom line was that -- relative to the destruction of European Jewry -- the number of Libyan and Tunisian Holocaust victims was negligible.

Interesting criterion, no? From now on, history books should only record cases where at least half a million people were killed. Casualties of other incidents are welcome to create their own alternative history books.

Sergio Tessa can be reached at Hadar-Israel@verizon.net.

To Go To Top

A LEADER MUST DO WHAT A LEADER HAS TO DO
Posted by Batya Medad, January 9, 2007.

The "pacifist" ideal has captured our nation. This is nothing new; the invasion began decades ago. For instance, Golda Meir was very proud of her 1969 statement:

"When peace comes we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons."

Menachem Begin considered himself a proper gentleman by not replacing government appointees who opposed him, with those who supported him, when in 1977, after nineteen years as leader of the opposition, he was finally elected Prime Minister of Israel. In addition he never demanded retribution or even apologies from the Labor/Haganah/Palmach for the Sezon crime and the Altalena attack, among other wrongs they did to Begin and the Revisionists.

This past Shabbat, Vayichi, as I was reading the Haftarat Parshat Vaychi -- Melachim I 2:1-12, which shows us the dying King David's final instructions to his son Shlomo, Solomon, who was to succeed him, I found myself thinking of what has been happening here in Israel.

Just a few verses earlier, King David is depicted as apathetic and totally oblivious to what what happening around him. Not even a ravishing young maiden could get him to warm up and take an interest. Then Batsheva entered the room, his true love, the woman he risked his throne for, the one whose son he had promised would succeed him as King.

In this past week's Haftara, (the entire chapter is at the end of the post), we read the instructions King David, suddenly showing the vision and strength of his youth, gave his son. He demanded courage and leadership, unflinching determination and also revenge.

Yes, revenge! King David instructed his young son to execute a number of people who would be dangerous to his rule. Shlomo even had to kill Joab the son of Zeruiah, who was David's nephew, Solomon's older cousin. For Solomon to successfully rule, he couldn't leave such a powerful and potentially disloyal person as Yoav alive. King David could control him, but Yoav would be a danger to Solomon. According to modern propriety, this sounds horrendously immoral. But being a true leader is doing what has to be done to protect one's people, without worrying about what others think.

By inaugurating his rule with such a masterful act, Shlomo Hamelech guaranteed himself loyalty and security. And he also showed himself a true descendant of Yehuda, who bravely "stepped up to the viceroy of Egypt" to protect his youngest brother.

We are being ruled by politicians who are desperately trying to please the world rather than do what's best for our country, our Land, our People. When we hear politicians defend dangerous policies, because the world will like us better, you know we're in trouble.

Many of us thought that the Likud, founded by the Revisionists, former Jewish "underground" leaders from the Etzel and Lechi, would be the politicians to lead our country best, but there has been only disappointment and tragedy.

Chazal (our sages) tell us that nothing is just by chance; it's all due to the hand of G-d. And it's true. Last night traveling home, I ended up in a ride driven by a friend who has done much for Eretz Yisrael (the Land of Israel.) We found ourselves talking about just this topic, and she reminded me of something important.

"The Revisionist were never a "settlement" movement."

"Yes," I agreed. "They were more intellectual, philosophers. Their image as strong militants came from the nasty things said by the Labor Zionists, like when they were accused of murdering Alosoroff."

Their Etzel and Lechi were very small groups of activists of diverse life-styles. They united against the British. Once the State of Israel came into being, their political power was very marginal. It wasn't until the North African Jews began to vote for the Likud in great numbers that the government was able to change, and Menachem Begin became Prime Minister.

Unfortunately, Begin, instead of being the Menachem Begin people had voted for, decided to be a "diplomat" and appoint his opponent, Moshe Dayan, as Foreign Minister. The result was, that Moshe Dayan, who had always opposed Begin and everything he stood for, was instrumental in drawing up the Camp David Accords which demanded that Israel withdraw from the Sinai and destroy all Jewish communities there, the precedent for Disengagement. The ironic thing is that some of those very same Jewish communities destroyed due to Disengagement were established as compensation for the Sinai withdrawal. I remember visiting the original Atzmona yeshiva before Israel gave the Sinai to Egypt.

Personally, it has always bothered me that people use the term "peace" for something like the Begin-Carter-Sadat Camp David Agreement, since if it really was peace they had intended, then Jews could have remained living there freely, and there never would have been any destruction of Jewish homes and communities.

Sadly, today I don't see any true leader to take up the reigns as a descendant of Yehuda, David and Shlomo, but G-d willing, just like Shmuel found the modest shepherd, David, our new "David" will emerge from wherever he or she is now.

B'mhaira biyameinu!

Speedily in our days!

Batya

ps I must thank my husband for helping with the research! 1 Kings Chapter 2

2:1 Now the days of David drew nigh that he should die; and he charged Solomon his son, saying:
2:2 'I go the way of all the earth; be thou strong therefore, and show thyself a man;
2:3 and keep the charge of the Lord thy God, to walk in His ways, to keep His statutes, and His commandments, and His ordinances, and His testimonies, according to that which is written in the law of Moses, that thou mayest prosper in all that thou doest, and whithersoever thou turnest thyself;
2:4 that the Lord may establish His word which He spoke concerning me, saying: If thy children take heed to their way, to walk before Me in truth with all their heart and with all their soul, there shall not fail thee, said He, a man on the throne of Israel.
2:5 Moreover thou knowest also what Joab the son of Zeruiah did unto me, even what he did to the two captains of the hosts of Israel, unto Abner the son of Ner and unto Amasa the son of Jether, whom he slew, and shed the blood of war in peace, and put the blood of war upon his girdle that was about his loins, and in his shoes that were on his feet.
2:6 Do therefore according to thy wisdom, and let not his hoar head go down to the grave in peace.
2:7 But show kindness unto the sons of Barzillai the Gileadite, and let them be of those that eat at thy table; for so they drew nigh unto me when I fled from Absalom thy brother.
2:8 And, behold, there is with thee Shimei the son of Gera, the Benjamite, of Bahurim, who cursed me with a grievous curse in the day when I went to Mahanaim; but he came down to meet me at the Jordan, and I swore to him by the Lord, saying: I will not put thee to death with the sword.
2:9 Now therefore hold him not guiltless, for thou art a wise man; and thou wilt know what thou oughtest to do unto him, and thou shalt bring his hoar head down to the grave with blood.'
2:10 And David slept with his fathers, and was buried in the city of David.
2:11 And the days that David reigned over Israel were forty years: seven years reigned he in Hebron, and thirty and three years reigned he in Jerusalem.
2:12 And Solomon sat upon the throne of David his father; and his kingdom was established firmly.
2:13 Then Adonijah the son of Haggith came to Bath-sheba the mother of Solomon. And she said: 'Comest thou peaceably?' And he said: 'Peaceably.'
2:14 He said moreover: 'I have somewhat to say unto thee.' And she said: 'Say on.'
2:15 And he said: 'Thou knowest that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel set their faces on me, that I should reign; howbeit the kingdom is turned about, and is become my brother's; for it was his from the Lord.
2:16 And now I ask one petition of thee, deny me not.' And she said unto him: 'Say on.'
2:17 And he said: 'Speak, I pray thee, unto Solomon the king--for he will not say thee nay--that he give me Abishag the Shunammite to wife.'
2:18 And Bath-sheba said: 'Well; I will speak for thee unto the king.'
2:19 Bath-sheba therefore went unto king Solomon, to speak unto him for Adonijah. And the king rose up to meet her, and bowed down unto her, and sat down on his throne, and caused a throne to be set for the king's mother; and she sat on his right hand.
2:20 Then she said: 'I ask one small petition of thee; deny me not.' And the king said unto her: 'Ask on, my mother; for I will not deny thee.'
2:21 And she said: 'Let Abishag the Shunammite be given to Adonijah thy brother to wife.'
2:22 And king Solomon answered and said unto his mother: 'And why dost thou ask Abishag the Shunammite for Adonijah? ask for him the kingdom also; for he is mine elder brother; even for him, and for Abiathar the priest, and for Joab the son of Zeruiah.'
2:23 Then king Solomon swore by the Lord, saying: 'God do so to me, and more also, if Adonijah have not spoken this word against his own life.
2:24 Now therefore as the Lord liveth, who hath established me, and set me on the throne of David my father, and who hath made me a house, as He promised, surely Adonijah shall be put to death this day.'
2:25 And king Solomon sent by the hand of Benaiah the son of Jehoiada; and he fell upon him, so that he died.
2:26 And unto Abiathar the priest said the king: 'Get thee to Anathoth, unto thine own fields; for thou art deserving of death; but I will not at this time put thee to death, because thou didst bear the ark of the L-rd GOD before David my father, and because thou wast afflicted in all wherein my father was afflicted.'
2:27 So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest unto the Lord; that the word of the Lord might be fulfilled, which He spoke concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh.
2:28 And the tidings came to Joab; for Joab had turned after Adonijah, though he turned not after Absalom. And Joab fled unto the Tent of the Lord, and caught hold on the horns of the altar.
2:29 And it was told king Solomon: 'Joab is fled unto the Tent of the Lord, and, behold, he is by the altar.' Then Solomon sent Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, saying: 'Go, fall upon him.'
2:30 And Benaiah came to the Tent of the Lord, and said unto him: 'Thus saith the king: Come forth.' And he said: 'Nay; but I will die here.' And Benaiah brought back word unto the king, saying: 'Thus said Joab, and thus he answered me.'
2:31 And the king said unto him: 'Do as he hath said, and fall upon him, and bury him; that thou mayest take away the blood, which Joab shed without cause, from me and from my father's house.
2:32 And the Lord will return his blood upon his own head, because he fell upon two men more righteous and better than he, and slew them with the sword, and my father David knew it not: Abner the son of Ner, captain of the host of Israel, and Amasa the son of Jether, captain of the host of Judah.
2:33 So shall their blood return upon the head of Joab, and upon the head of his seed for ever; but unto David, and unto his seed, and unto his house, and unto his throne, shall there be peace for ever from the Lord.'
2:34 Then Benaiah the son of Jehoiada went up, and fell upon him, and slew him; and he was buried in his own house in the wilderness.
2:35 And the king put Benaiah the son of Jehoiada in his room over the host; and Zadok the priest did the king put in the room of Abiathar.
2:36 And the king sent and called for Shimei, and said unto him: Build thee a house in Jerusalem, and dwell there, and go not forth thence any whither.
2:37 For on the day thou goest out, and passest over the brook Kidron, know thou for certain that thou shalt surely die; thy blood shall be upon thine own head.'
2:38 And Shimei said unto the king: 'The saying is good; as my lord the king hath said, so will thy servant do.' And Shimei dwelt in Jerusalem many days.
2:39 And it came to pass at the end of three years, that two of the servants of Shimei ran away unto Achish, son of Maacah, king of Gath. And they told Shimei, saying: 'Behold, thy servants are in Gath.'
2:40 And Shimei arose, and saddled his ass, and went to Gath to Achish, to seek his servants; and Shimei went, and brought his servants from Gath.
2:41 And it was told Solomon that Shimei had gone from Jerusalem to Gath, and was come back.
2:42 And the king sent and called for Shimei, and said unto him: 'Did I not make thee to swear by the Lord, and forewarned thee, saying: Know for certain, that on the day thou goest out, and walkest abroad any whither, thou shalt surely die? and thou saidst unto me: The saying is good; I have heard it.
2:43 Why then hast thou not kept the oath of the Lord, and the commandment that I have charged thee with?'
2:44 The king said moreover to Shimei: 'Thou knowest all the wickedness which thy heart is privy to, that thou didst to David my father; therefore the Lord shall return thy wickedness upon thine own head.
2:45 But king Solomon shall be blessed, and the throne of David shall be established before the Lord for ever.'
2:46 So the king commanded Benaiah the son of Jehoiada; and he went out, and fell upon him, so that he died. And the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon.

Batya Medad lives in Shiloh. She can be reached by email at Shilohmuse@yahoo.com or visit her website http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/ or go to http://www.shilo.org.il

To Go To Top

DRACONIAN MEASURES 2
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 9, 2007.

You should have in your hands an article entitled "KNESSET APPROVES DRACONIAN REGULATIONS WITHOUT PERUSAL" -- Click here to see it. Let's discuss what this means to Israel and the Jewish people world-wide.

Did you ever imagine that after the pogroms in Russia and Poland, a few Jews in Israel would put their heads together to plan a purge, a pogrom of their own people?...to not only plan the attacks by misusing Jewish soldiers and police but to prepare concentration camps as Stalin did in the Gulag? Any Jew legally protecting misuse of Government powers may be arrested and driven into a prepared concentration camp, charged with sedition or any spurious charges the Police and/or Shabak (Israel's Secret Service) chooses to make up.

Worse yet, they expected the Knesset to follow along, like sheep and they did. Sharon, Olmert, Mazuz and, no doubt, other confederates yet to be exposed, planned a pogrom and carried it out with more to come under PM Ehud Olmert as a revolution or rather a coup.

How did the Jewish people of Israel become a targeted enemy of these revolutionaries? The question now is: Will the people have the courage to take back the nation from these thugs and betrayers of the dreams of all Jewish people?

We are told that "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

The Jewish people couldn't grasp the agenda of the Left because it was done quietly. Old Russia and its Stalinist ways came piggy-back on the earliest immigrants called political leaders.

Israel has been lately taken over by a coup d'etat of parasites. Like the bacteria in the body. If you don't treat it and kill the bacteria, they will eventually kill you as their temporary host. The Parasites in Israel have seized power and now feed off the host body, the people of Israel. The Parasites feel the weakness and submissiveness of the people so they vote themselves even more power with nothing to stop them.

Today Israel's body is infested with Parasites who will feed on their hosts' bodies until they are nothing but corpses. They seem to ignore the basic fact that when Israel is dead, they too will die. There will be nothing left for them to feed on. This will be of little consolation to the millions who will die because of these virulent Parasites...(Peresites??)

While Israel has its own internal Parasites slowly eating away her will to live, she is also surrounded by a different kind of Parasites called radical, militant fundamentalist Islam who similarly feeds on whatever nation succumbs to their increasing numbers as they migrate in til they reach critical mass. Both types of Parasites could have been eliminated but, Israel, like America has waited too long to start the corrective, healing treatment.

How did the virus of anti-Semitism migrate from the graveyards of Europe and Russia to Israel? It takes a special warped personality to duplicate the ways of Stalin's KGB and Hitler's SS Gestapo in targeting Jews when you yourself claim to be Jewish.

[Now, just saying that and/or writing it down has caused good people to be arrested, tried, caused to spend lots of money defending themselves for exercising their rights to free speech. But, we shouldn't let that stop us from speaking out in protest when the Government of the Jewish State of Israel which we love -- when this current Government acts in ways that are not ethical, moral, safe or fitting to the Jewish people and the sovereignty of the State.]

The recent exposure of secret documents and plans to make parts of Israel "Judenrein" and to round up protestors to be held in special camps is more than draconian. It is the anti-thesis of Good and is, therefore, Evil -- quite Evil. It is no different than Stalin's purges when whole villages of Jews were wiped out or driven into the country-side, there to starve and die. I have long recommended a Peoples' Court to be convened to try these greedy enemies of the Jewish people from the politicians to the Leftist Courts who are a political party unto themselves.

The Knesset has failed in all ways to protect the people. Many have joined the corrupt Government so they may continue to enjoy their high salaries, paid long vacations, and the many perks that come with the office. But, the greedy found that Government salaries were insufficient for the lives they wished to lead so they became what appears to be a crooked mafia from the top down. Here one finds politicians, generals, Police and Shabak stuffing their pockets through illegal deals and nothing to stop them.

Corrupt politicians have methodically absorbed every office of power, both in and out of Government. We see "diktats" coming out of the Prime Minister's office without consultation with the Knesset or even their own Cabinet.

The draconian secret laws are still on the books, meaning any patriotic Israeli can be whisked off to prison merely on the say-so of the Secret Services, Secret Courts, Secret Government decisions.

Is this the Israel Jews dreamed about since the Diaspora forced on them by the Romans in 70 C.E. Every rotten trick and law promulgated by the Stalinists has been adopted with modifications by so-called Jewish leaders. There were decent and honorable men who could have been voted into office but the people seemed to think that a crooked politician would be a stronger representative of their interests.

Why is it that evil and ruthlessness always appears to be stronger than good? If a Government can betray the nation, why cannot the people revolt and throw them out of office? Is it because those like Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, Arik Sharon and Ehud Olmert had threatened internment in a prepared concentration camp for anyone who objects to their rule?

Soldiers and civilians threatened by Arabs fear to use their weapons even to save their own lives lest the corrupt and pro-Arab Courts sentence them to long terms in jail.

We already observe the corrupt political Court system which jails young teenage girls for even being near protesters. We saw police and soldiers unleashed to beat, trample with horses and jail protesters. It didn't begin with Sharon, Olmert and Mazuz. It did start in earnest under Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. Sharon and Olmert merely expanded it from there. Israel may not survive the next go around attack by the Arab Muslims from outside the country and from the Arab Muslim Palestinians within, under Olmert, the Kadimites, the Labor Left, the Leftists Courts and the radically Leftist Media.

One more thought: Jewish leadership in America assume Israeli leaders are honest, ethical and work to do the best for the nation. The facts speak otherwise and should begin to demand accountability because money is fungible and should not end up in the wrong pockets.

If the nation doesn't rise up as one and clean out this perfidious gang called "The Government", then pack your bags for Babylon and the next Diaspora.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

JOE, ARE YOU BEING INTOLERANT OF THE MUZZIE-WUMPS?
Posted by Michael Travis, January 8, 2007.

Hey, this really makes me feel secure and protected

The News Release below comes from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The Joe Kaufman they talk about runs the Americans Against Hate website (http://americansagainsthate.blogspot.com/). Read his "Answering CAIR's Libels Against Me" January 9, 2007 on his website. He also writes frequently on CAIR, such as "CAIR and Islamic Jihad," May 23, 2006, in Front Page Magazine
(www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22557).
 

CA: FBI Probes Death Threat Against Muslim Activist

FBI Probes Death Threat Against Calif. Muslim Activist

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 1/5/07) -- A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group said today that the FBI is investigating a death threat against one of its chapter heads in California.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said the threat was contained in an e-mail message sent to Basim Elkarra, executive director of the Washington-based group's Sacramento Valley chapter.

That threat came a day after a media report indicated that Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) had rescinded an award given to Elkarra because she read attacks against CAIR on an anti-Muslim Internet hate site and after a pressure campaign by Joe Kaufman, an anti-Muslim extremist in Florida.

SEE: Boxer Pulls Muslim Award (Sacramento Bee)

Kaufman has a long history of seeking to marginalize and disenfranchise the American Muslim community and its institutions. He has in the past promoted the terrorist organizations Kach and Kahane Chai and praised the Kahane movement and its founder Mier Kahane on a forum of the radical Jewish Defense League in Florida. In another article, Kaufman wrote that "we should nuke Damascus" and "we should have nuked the Afghanistan capital of Kabul."

Last year, Kaufman joined forces with an anti-Islam preacher in Florida to block the expansion of a mosque in Boca Raton. "This mosque should not exist on American shores," said Kaufman. (St. Petersburg Times, 7/14/06)

SEE: A Kahane Legacy Lost by Joe Kaufman (Jewish Defense League of Florida)

SEE ALSO: Making Friends with the Enemy...The Nuclear Way (Florida Jewish Speakout)

The website Boxer consulted to form her opinions about CAIR, www.frontpagemag.com, regularly publishes Kaufman's writings and articles promoting conspiracy theories about Islam and Muslims in America.

An editor with the Sacramento Bee in California today defended CAIR, while describing Kaufman as "a right-wing blogger."

Ginger Rutland wrote: "For me, CAIR's efforts to reach out are reminiscent of the efforts of other Americans falsely accused of disloyalty: Japanese, German and Italian Americans during World War II, civil rights activists and Vietnam War opponents casually smeared as communists in the 1950s and '60s...she must understand what her casual withdrawal of a casually awarded tribute means to a Muslim American at this moment in American history. Shame on her."

SEE: The CAIR Takeaway (Sacramento Bee)

CAIR Board Chairman Dr. Parvez Ahmed today outlined CAIR's response to Boxer in a commentary published on his personal blog. In that commentary, Ahmed wrote: "By acting on smears, distortions and guilt by association, Sen. Boxer has failed her Muslim constituents and has betrayed the progressive values of her party and state."

SEE: Islamophobes Mislead Senator Boxer

"Terror threats of the kind sent to CAIR's Sacramento Valley director must be repudiated by political and religious leaders in California and nationwide," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "We thank the FBI for taking action in this case and urge Senator Boxer to examine the agendas of those who seek to marginalize and disenfranchise American Muslims."

CAIR, America's largest Islamic civil liberties group, has 32 offices and chapters nationwide and in Canada. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

END OF RELEASE

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

BAKER'S DEFENSE; JEWS NOT ALLOWED TO PROTEST BASHING; OUTSOURCING TO ISRAEL
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 8, 2007.

DOES ISRAEL GUARD GAZA BORDER OR NOT?

Israel yielded control over the Gaza-Sinai border to the P.A. and Egypt. The Arabs smuggle in arms, terrorists, and money. Hamas bag men bypass the Western financial boycott. Israelis urged their government not to let Hamas Prime Minister Haniyeh back into Gaza, after his trip abroad, during which he coordinated his struggle with Iran.

The Hamas Prime Minister arrived at the border back with $35 million in cash. Israel wouldn't let him in until, hours later, he left the money behind. By this time, his followers vandalized the border crossing and got into gun battles with both P.A. troops there and Egyptian police on the other side. The European observers fled.

As Haniyeh passed through, opposition gunmen opened fire on his car, missing him but killing his bodyguard. Thirty people were wounded. He claims to know who they are and how to deal with them.

Hamas has dispatched its forces in Gaza, security forces are deployed, and businesses are shuttering, in anticipation of widespread clashes. Both Hamas and Fatah indicated they would follow Friday prayers with armed marches. A Fatah man threw a grenade at a parade of Hamas men, wounding two (IMRA, 12/14 & Arutz-7, 12/15).

BAKER'S DEFENSE

The Baker panel report is beset by criticism. Mr. Baker defended his proposal to negotiate with Iran as useful if negotiations fail, because that would expose Iran as being uncooperative. Caroline Glick asks, exposed to whom. Everybody knows that Iran and Syria, between them, are: (1) Developing nuclear weapons; (2) Assisting the insurgency in Iraq; (3) Rearming Hizbullah for another war after having fomented the last one; (4) Assassinating independent leaders in Lebanon, so Hizbullah can take over; and (5) Turning the P.A. into its proxy. Everybody but Baker knows it.) The problem is that the EU, UNO, Russia, and China don't care or are complicit, not ignorance.

The Bush administration is unrealistic, too. It has ceded leadership in thwarting Iranian nuclear arming to the UNO, on the theory that if the UNO fails, then the US can say it gave the UNO a chance and take independent action. Years passed, the UNO has failed, and the UNO has become an adversary of the US in Iraq. Still the US doesn't act.

Equally unrealistic, the Olmert regime is considering an Italian offer to station troops in Gaza. Olmert should know that Italy would not fight Israel's enemies. In Lebanon, UNIFIL made Israel end the coastal and air blockade, facilitating Hizbullah rearmament. It enabled Hizbullah to regain control over border towns, and made the IDF withdraw from a border-straddling town that Hizbullah used for intelligence and drug smuggling. The Europeans don't object to Gaza arms smuggling. Europe objects to Israel!

Baker, Bush, and Olmert avoid exposing the enemy. Baker and Olmert act as if the enemy are friends. They don't make the case for the US and Israel. That will not get Europe to confront Islamic barbarism. Wishful thinking gets us nowhere (IMRA, 12/15 from Caroline Glick) except killed.

GOOD NEWS & BAD NEWS ABOUT DARFUR

The good news is that the UNO Human Rights Commission held its first special meeting not about Israel. It was about Darfur.

The bad news is that its resolution expressed concern about human rights there, but did not condemn Sudan for human rights violations (IMRA, 12/16).

What good is a human rights commission that fails to condemn genocide?

P.A. EXPLAINS THE BASIS OF ARAB-ISRAEL CONFLICT

The ceasefire is just a tactic in the complete "liberation of Palestine," said P.A. Foreign Min. a-Zahar. "We as Muslims are the owners of this land and we shall not give up a single handful of Palestinian soil."

"He declared that a solution to the conflict is not the creation of a Palestinian state according to the 1967 boundaries, but the total liberation of 'all Palestinian lands'-- a popular euphemism for the territory 'occupied' by the State of Israel." "...he rejected any type of security coordination with Israel, which he termed 'a betrayal of the homeland.'"

"PA Deputy Minister for Religious Affairs Salah Alrakab told the students that Islam forbids signing a peace agreement with Jews, because 'The conflict with the Jews is a religious, existential struggle and is not a conflict over borders.' At most, he said, Islamic law permits signing a temporary hudna (cease-fire)." (IMRA, 12/16.)

The point is not whether that position is "extremist" but that it is Islamic. It debunks Israeli notions of security cooperation with the Muslim Arabs. It shows that the battle is over the existence of a Jewish state and not, as Pres. Bush put it, national aspirations for an Arab state of their own. The struggle is not territorial, but religious.

JEWS NOT ALLOWED TO COMPLAIN AT LEEDS U.

The student union approved a proposal by the Palestinian Solidarity Group to ignore complaints by the Jewish Society "as long as Judaism as a faith is not offended." (IMRA, 12/16.)

The Arabs may continue to defame Israel, and the Jews may not complain about it. All that in the name of tolerance. Ironically, the defamation is based on religious conflict.

Leftists and other antisemites are taking away people's freedom.

TURKEY AFFIRMS HOLOCAUST

The Foreign Minister confirmed that the Holocaust occurred and was a terrible crime (IMRA, 12/16).

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

PROPOSED 2007 SYMPOSIUM ON TERRORISM
Posted by Jeff Epstein, January 8, 2007.

Well, I'm looking to do it again. Please keep your schedule open for the last weekend of October. I'm intending to host a three-day event spanning 10/26/07 -10/28/07. Details will be released in the near future.

Below is a summary of the Symposium on The Threat of Radical Islamist Terrorism Las Vegas, Nevada -- November 10th & 11th 2006.

On November 10th and 11th of 2006, ten internationally respected experts on various aspects of the threat of radical Islamist terrorism met in Las Vegas, Nevada for a symposium hosted by America's Truth Forum in association with Basics Project. This educational event was dedicated to sharing first-source, expert knowledge on the subject with those in attendance. While the event was open to the public almost half of those in attendance were from government or law enforcement, including representatives from the US Marshal's Office and the FBI's Joint Counter-Terrorism Task Force.

The event, divided into two programs, started at the Sahara Hotel with opening statements and the first two speakers, Joe Kaufman from Americans Against Hate and Dr, Harvey Kushner an internationally recognized expert on terrorism. Most all of the second day's speakers were in attendance though not slated to speak.

The opening statements were provided by Frank Salvato, executive director of Basics Project. After the welcome he gave a short talk about the dangers associated with limited access to first-source fact-based information. Mr. Salvato pointed out that when private search engine companies manipulate the sources of information they walk a fine line between exercising their rights as a private entity and censoring information from the public for ideological purposes.

"With the recent discovery that Google is manipulating its search engine index database to align with a political agenda, keeping in mind that they account for approximately one-half of all Internet searches made around the world -- including searches for information made by those in our government, it is clear that information brokers have placed their ideology and special interests above the principle of providing the American people access to the facts, should they differ from their agenda. In doing so they deprive the American people of the right to a fact-based, educated opinion on a plethora of issues, including the threat of radical Islamist terrorism. This manipulation of information is a direct threat to our system of government, our American Heritage and to the future of our country."

The first speaker introduced Friday evening was Joe Kaufman, president of Americans Against Hate. He talked at length and presented information on the extremist nature and terrorist ties of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). He presented information about several of CAIR's high-ranking members who have been tried and convicted of promoting and abetting terrorist groups from within the United States and how current CAIR officials walk a fine line with their relationships with known terrorist entities both here in America and abroad.

The second speaker to address the audience was Dr. Harvey Kushner. Dr. Kushner is a noted author, lecturer and professor from Long Island University. He has advised and provided training for a plethora of government agencies including the FBI, FAA, INS and US Customs. He is a frequent guest on all of the network news television shows.

Dr. Kushner spoke on the aggressive indoctrination of students by Islamist activists on our nation's university campuses. He spoke of how introductions are made, many times through the permissive drug cultures that exist on campuses throughout the United States and how university officials many times confuse on-campus counter-terrorism efforts by authorities with racially profiled discrimination.

The first evening was capped off with a question and answer period with the two featured speakers and a seafood buffet dinner and open bar. During the dinner and cocktail portion of the evening, guests were invited to converse with not only the evening's speakers but all of the speakers in attendance. The evening facilitated a tremendous opportunity for professional and social networking.

Saturday's symposium, a full day event, was held at the Las Vegas Hilton. Again, almost half of those who attended this publicly accessible event were from government or law enforcement, including representatives from the US Marshal's Office, the FBI's Joint Counter-Terrorism Task Force and an attendee from Moscow whose attendance was facilitated by Sen. Carl Levin's office.

The Master of Ceremonies was Paul Schiffer, a radio personality from Ohio. Scheduled to speak and seated on the dais were Dr. Babu Suseelan, Dr. Wafa Sultan, Walid Shoebat, Robert Spencer, Dr. Bruce Tefft, Mr. Jim Gilchrist, Dr. Harvey Kushner, Dr. Paul Williams and Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir.

Jeffrey Epstein, president of America's Truth Forum, opened the day by commenting on the threat posed by radical Islamist terrorists to, not only the United States, but to Western civilization. Commenting on the unacceptable number of deaths perpetrated by those who practiced fundamentalist Islam around the world, he stressed that it is only through education and the courage to speak and understand the truth that this evil can be confronted and vanquished. He spoke about the inherent hardships and multiple roadblocks he and Mr. Salvato experienced in their quest to make the symposium move from plan to reality and rightfully appealed for financial help from those in attendance, He noted that to date, he and Mr. Salvato have been producing these symposiums at a deficit, their own funds being compromised so that the truth may be told.

Dr. Suseelan, a noted authority on the relationship between the Hindu and Islamic communities spoke on the centuries old conflict between the two cultures, elaborating on fundamentalist Islam's continued threat to world peace from a Hindu perspective.

Dr. Wafa Sultan, a secular Syrian-American psychiatrist currently living in Los Angeles, has, since the September 11th attacks, debated the legitimacy of radical Islam's agenda on television news and commentary programs throughout the Middle East, including Al Manar and Al Jazeera. Her political essays address her personal experiences with those who practice radical Islam including the assassination of her college professor, an assassination that took place in class in the presence of his students. Dr. Sultan's thesis, described as witnessing a "battle between modernity and barbarism which Islam will lose," has garnered her invitation to speak around the world.

Walid Shoebat presented a first-hand account of the mindset of an Islamic terrorist. Mr. Shoebat is a reformed PLO terrorist who participated in bombings and other acts of violent terror in Israel, including rioting in Bethlehem and the Temple Mount, before being imprisoned. Accepting a challenge from his wife, Mr. Shoebat shared how he entered into an intensive study of the Christian faith and the ways of the West. His studies, he described, served as an epiphany to the evil he had toiled under all of his youthful life. He described his revelations and shared the extent of the hatred he held for the West before he realized his life, up to that point, had been a lie. Mr. Shoebat now travels the world speaking as an advocate for his former foes.

Robert Spencer, a noted expert on the Quran and the director of JihadWatch, spoke on the West's misidentification of the challenges faced from the current global jihad. Mr. Spencer has studied Islam, the Islamic Culture and the Quran for over 20 years. He is an Adjunct Fellow with the Free Congress Foundation. Mr. Spencer elaborated on the diligence of those who practice radical, fundamentalist Islam, especially of the Wahhabi sect.

The afternoon session commenced with Dr. Bruce Tefft who explained in detail the foundation of the various Islamic terror organization. Dr. Tefft was a founding member of the Central Intelligence Agency's Counterterrorism Center in 1985. During the thirty years of experience in counterterrorism, Dr. Tefft has trained over 12,000 law enforcement officers and first responders. He was named as the New York Police Department's counterterrorism and intelligence advisor and has served in this capacity since September 11, 2001.

Jim Gilchrist of the multi-ethnic Minuteman Project, shared with the audience and speakers alike his first-hand experience with the subject of our porous borders. Mr. Gilchrist spoke of the many instances where Minutemen found materials identified as those carried by individuals illegally entering our country from Middle Eastern countries. Among the materials found along the US-Mexico border have been Islamic prayer rugs, radical Islamist propaganda and pro-terrorist propaganda. He shared conversations he had with border security officials who stated that individuals wanted by US authorities in connection with existing terror threats had gained access due to our unsecured borders.

Dr. Harvey Kushner, who was gracious enough to have spoken the night before, quickly caught the audience up to speed on the aggressive indoctrination tactics used by radical, fundamentalist Islamists on our nation's university campuses and then expounded on the indoctrination process occurring on a daily basis in our prison system and in the increasing number of Mosques across the country. His chilling presentation verified that radical Islamists have taken their jihad, their holy war, to the streets of the United States.

Dr. Paul Williams, author of The al Qaeda Connection and Osama's Revenge, serves as a consultant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and an Adjunct Professor of the Humanities at the University of Scranton. Dr. Williams elaborated on al Qaeda's plans for future attacks on the United States and commented on the often discussed "American Hiroshima," al Qaeda's plans for a nuclear attack within the United States.

The keynote speaker of the two-day event was Hamid Mir, Osama bin Laden's officially sanctioned biographer and the only journalist to have interviewed Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda's number two man, Ayman al Zawahri, since the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mr. Mir interviewed bin Laden in Tora Bora during the Coalition Forces' hunt for the terror leader and has since interviewed him twice more. Mr. Mir shared with the audience the mindset of the world's most wanted man, Osama bin Laden, and verified Dr. Williams' assertion that al Qaeda was planning to attack within the United States with nuclear weapons.

"It was understood in the beginning that 44 al Qaeda trained operatives would carry out two pre-planned operations within the United States. 19 of the operatives died in the planes that wrecked havoc on New York's World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the airplane that crashed in Pennsylvania. Another was caught due to his ineptitude and is now in your supermax prison, of course I speak of Zacarias Moussaoui. Simple math deduces that, unless they have been apprehended, 24 operatives remain to carry out the second attack. This second attack is to be of a nuclear nature, either through the use of dirty bombs or low-level nuclear explosives. The attack will center on several US cities and will come as a coordinated attack. It is understood that any US or Israeli military advance on Iran would trigger this attack prematurely."

The event ended with a round-table question and answer period that included questions from the audience as well as a conversation between the speakers on the issues presented over the two-day symposium.

Overall, the general response from those who attended this second presentation, second in a national series, was that it was one of the most informative and educational events they have ever attended on the subject. This accolade was common among the general public as well as the government officials who attended.

Contact Jeff Epstein at jepstein02@snet.net

To Go To Top

WHAT THOMAS JEFFERSON LEARNED FROM THE MUSLIM BOOK OF JIHAD
Posted by Shaul and Aviva Ceder, January 8, 2007.

This was written by Ted Sampley and it appeared January 5,2007 in U.S. Veteran Dispatch
(http://www.usvetdsp.com/). I received it from S. Dena McCormick. When this article was reprinted on www.FreeRepublic.com, one reader commented, "The only reason Jefferson had a copy of the Koran was so that he could learn more about his enemy, the muslim pirates along the North African coast. Knowing your enemy is good military wisdom." Another wrote, "Declaring that America was going to spend 'millions for defense but not one cent for tribute,' Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America's best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast." "That was in reference to Muslims?? Amazing!"

Sampley is an ex-army man, a Green Beret, and currently publisher/editor/writer of the U.S. Veteran Dispatch. He was appointed chairman of the non-profit Last Firebase Veterans Archives Project in 1988. That group created one of the largest collections of privately held POW/MIA files. From 1986 to 2003, the Last Firebase kept a non-stop, manned 24-hour vigil for POW's and MIAs in front of the Lincoln Memorial. He resides in Kinston, North Carolina. Contact him at usveterandispatch@earthlink.net

Democrat Keith Ellison is now officially the first Muslim United States congressman. True to his pledge, he placed his hand on the Quran, the Muslim book of jihad and pledged his allegiance to the United States during his ceremonial swearing-in.

Capitol Hill staff said Ellison's swearing-in photo opportunity drew more media than they had ever seen in the history of the U.S. House. Ellison represents the 5th Congressional District of Minnesota.

The Quran Ellison used was no ordinary book. It once belonged to Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and one of America's founding fathers. Ellison borrowed it from the Rare Book Section of the Library of Congress. It was one of the 6,500 Jefferson books archived in the library.

Ellison, who was born in Detroit and converted to Islam while in college, said he chose to use Jefferson's Quran because it showed that "a visionary like Jefferson" believed that wisdom could be gleaned from many sources.

There is no doubt Ellison was right about Jefferson believing wisdom could be "gleaned" from the Muslim Quran. At the time Jefferson owned the book, he needed to know everything possible about Muslims because he was about to advocate war against the Islamic "Barbary" states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Tripoli.

Ellison's use of Jefferson's Quran as a prop illuminates a subject once well-known in the history of the United States, but, which today, is mostly forgotten -- the Muslim pirate slavers who over many centuries enslaved millions of Africans and tens of thousands of Christian Europeans and Americans in the Islamic "Barbary" states.

Over the course of 10 centuries, Muslim pirates cruised the African and Mediterranean coastline, pillaging villages and seizing slaves.

The taking of slaves in pre-dawn raids on unsuspecting coastal villages had a high casualty rate. It was typical of Muslim raiders to kill off as many of the "non-Muslim" older men and women as possible so the preferred "booty" of only young women and children could be collected.

Young non-Muslim women were targeted because of their value as concubines in Islamic markets. Islamic law provides for the sexual interests of Muslim men by allowing them to take as many as four wives at one time and to have as many concubines as their fortunes allow.

Boys, as young as 9 or 10 years old, were often mutilated to create eunuchs who would bring higher prices in the slave markets of the Middle East. Muslim slave traders created "eunuch stations" along major African slave routes so the necessary surgery could be performed. It was estimated that only a small number of the boys subjected to the mutilation survived after the surgery.

When American colonists rebelled against British rule in 1776, American merchant ships lost Royal Navy protection. With no American Navy for protection, American ships were attacked and their Christian crews enslaved by Muslim pirates operating under the control of the "Dey of Algiers"--an Islamist warlord ruling Algeria.

Because American commerce in the Mediterranean was being destroyed by the pirates, the Continental Congress agreed in 1784 to negotiate treaties with the four Barbary States. Congress appointed a special commission consisting of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, to oversee the negotiations.

Lacking the ability to protect its merchant ships in the Mediterranean, the new America government tried to appease the Muslim slavers by agreeing to pay tribute and ransoms in order to retrieve seized American ships and buy the freedom of enslaved sailors.

Adams argued in favor of paying tribute as the cheapest way to get American commerce in the Mediterranean moving again. Jefferson was opposed. He believed there would be no end to the demands for tribute and wanted matters settled "through the medium of war." He proposed a league of trading nations to force an end to Muslim piracy.

In 1786, Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and Adams, then the American ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the "Dey of Algiers" ambassador to Britain.

The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress' vote to appease.

During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey's ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

In a later meeting with the American Congress, the two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."

For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Not long after Jefferson's inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.

Declaring that America was going to spend "millions for defense but not one cent for tribute," Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America's best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast.

The USS Constitution, USS Constellation, USS Philadelphia, USS Chesapeake, USS Argus, USS Syren and USS Intrepid all saw action.

In 1805, American Marines marched across the dessert from Egypt into Tripolitania, forcing the surrender of Tripoli and the freeing of all American slaves.

During the Jefferson administration, the Muslim Barbary States, crumbling as a result of intense American naval bombardment and on shore raids by Marines, finally officially agreed to abandon slavery and piracy.

Jefferson's victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine Hymn, with the line, "From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, we will fight our country's battles on the land as on the sea."

It wasn't until 1815 that the problem was fully settled by the total defeat of all the Muslim slave trading pirates.

Jefferson had been right. The "medium of war" was the only way to put and end to the Muslim problem. Mr. Ellison was right about Jefferson. He was a "visionary" wise enough to read and learn about the enemy from their own Muslim book of jihad.

Contact Shaul and Aviva Ceder at ceder@netvision.net.il

To Go To Top

TO RESIST A HOSTILE OPPRESSOR -- THIS IS HOW IT'S DONE
Posted by Aryeh Zelasko, January 8, 2007.

This is how a community deals with a hostile oppressor. They not only reject the authority of the State of Israel but are willing to openly challenge it when necessary. None of those involved where teenagers or young girls. They were all adult males. Let those who send their wives and children out to fight their battles for them take note.

This is from today's Arutz Sheva -- IsraelNationalNews.com -- and is archived at
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=119012 It is entitled "Removal of Electronic Bracelet Leads to Police Clash with Hasidim in Bnei Brak."

Fire Olmert (pronounced all-merde) today!

(IsraelNN.com) Security officers were assaulted last Monday by dozens of Orthodox Jews as they attempted to enter a Satmar Hasidim-owned hotel in B'nai Brak to track down a Jerusalem man under house arrest there, after the homing device on his court-ordered electronic bracelet went dead. The man claimed he had removed the bracelet on his rabbi's orders because it violated the Sabbath.

Arrested during the anti-gay rioting that accompanied the Jerusalem gay pride festival last November, the man had been released on bail but was ordered to stay in the Satmar-owned hotel in B'nai Brak while awaiting trial. He had reportedly been removing his bracelet each Friday for weeks, prompting repeated alarms at the headquarters of the private security firm contracted by the court to monitor the electronic device.

Three agents from the security firm approached the hotel January 1 after the man's homing device still failed to respond. Several dozen Hasidic men poured out of the hotel, overturned the agents' vehicle, punctured its tires and smashed its windows. The agents then fled and radioed for police assistance, with a group of Hasidim in pursuit.

A large contingent of Tel Aviv police arrived with sirens blaring, and the rioters quickly dispersed. Officers gave chase, but were unable to make arrests and instead returned to the hotel to retrieve the damaged vehicle, fearing that it would be set afire. Meanwhile, the arrested man with the electronic bracelet emerged from the hotel and patiently explained to the police the problem of Sabbath desecration caused by the bracelet.

Aryeh Zelasko lives in Beitar Illit, south of Jerusalem. He is Director of Sales and Marketing of Israel Visit (www.israelvisit.co.il) which provides information and an internet buying facility for American visitors to Israel.

To Go To Top

U.S. PROMOTES RADICAL ISLAMIC GROUP CAIR
Posted by Michael Travis, January 8, 2007.

This article comes from Corruption Chronicles: A Judicial Watch Blog
http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2007/01/ us_promotes_radical_islamic_gr.html
Some comments posted to the article are included.

Weeks after allowing a terrorist organization that preaches radical Islamic ideology to conduct Muslim "sensitivity training" for federal officers, U.S. officials continue promoting the group by publishing its propaganda on a taxpayer-funded government web site.

This week the Department of Homeland Security's Transportation Security Administration (TSA) actually published a press release authored by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a national organization that serves as the U.S. front for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. Evidently, CAIR approves of the special training that 45,000 TSA workers -- responsible for security of the nation's transportation system -- received about Islamic traditions related to a Mecca pilgrimage known as to Hajj.

It bills itself as a Muslim civil rights organization but CAIR has been described by top FBI counter terrorism chiefs as an entity that not only promotes terrorism, but also finances it. One group has dedicated itself to documenting CAIR's extensive terrorist ties which include a top official sentenced to 20 years in prison for participating in a network of militant jihadists, another convicted of bank fraud for financing a major terrorist group, a board member who was a co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and a fundraiser identified by the U.S. Treasury Department for financing Al Qaida.

It seems beyond belief that the U.S. Government would promote such a group or allow it to conduct any type of training for sworn federal officers. Just weeks ago, CAIR led the workshop on Islam and the American Muslim community for FBI agents and Joint Terrorism Task Force supervisory personnel in north Florida.

At least one U.S. lawmaker has publicly acknowledged how dangerous CAIR is. California Senator Barbara Boxer rescinded an award to an Islamic activist in her state because of the man's connections to CAIR. A notoriously liberal Democrat, Boxer actually withdrew the certificate of accomplishment she had awarded a Sacramento activist named Basim Elkarra after learning that he is an official at CAIR because the organization "gives aid to international terrorist groups."


Why would the US gov. collaborate with a group that considers action against terrorism anti-Islamic? Remember the bruhaha that CAIR created when a Los Angeles billboard described Osama bin Laden as a sworn enemy? CAIR demanded removal of the billboard because it was "offensive to Muslims." Now we are promoting these idiots and letting them train our federal officers?
Posted by: Jay Howstent

What is most offensive about CAIR is that the terrorists running it say they are the muslim NAACP! As a longtime beliver, supporter and member of the NAACP I find the comparison both outrageous and pathetic. That these supporters and promoters of terrorism--not to mention defenders of Osama bin Laden---try to capitalize on the black movement is pathetic!
Posted by: M. Wilson

The CAIR organization is offensive to all Christians in this country. They promote an intolerant religion that murders people who don't agree with them. Why in the hell should the taxpayers of the United States allow the left-wing apologists in our government to spend OUR money to promote "sensitivity training" for our Federal Officials. They ought to be investigating CAIR for sedition and support of terrorism. Deluge your representatives and senators with calls about the absurd act. To HELL with CAIR and those that promote it.
Posted by: T Fisher

I voted for Bush (twice) but can't, for the life of me, figure out why his administration keeps pandering to CAIR. What is this adminstration afraid of? It seems so pathetic and spineless.
Posted by: Tinkerbell Learning that our nation is coddling groups like CAIR scares the living daylights out of me.

My God, can't they see what it's all about.It's only a matter of time until the new Muslim congressman sponsors a bill to introduce sharia law. Then may the real God save us from Allah. I voted for Bush twice but never again. Something is terribly wrong. The so-called freedom of the Iraqi people is all that matters. In two short years we will be the North American Union (Canada, the United States and Mexico combined) and nothing will matter. We will have lost our sovereignty to the highest bidder and the soul of America will be lost.
Posted by: Dorothy Yonker

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

IN ISRAEL THE ARABS ARE THE FIRST-CLASS CITIZENS
Posted by The Reality Show, January 8, 2007.

Favoring Arabs' rights, Gov´t Allows Arabs To Squat on Jewish Farmland
January 7, 2007
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=118929

(IsraelNN.com)

The Civil Lands Administration has allowed Arabs from Yatta, near Hevron, to squat on land 10 miles away that has been farmed by Jews for 10 years. Nearby residents of Beit Yatir, in the southern Hevron Hills, protested on the property Friday, claiming that the presence of the Arabs presents a danger to the area.

"Their tractors are unlicensed and they drive them on the roads at night without lights," said a Yatir spokesman. Army officers who arrived on the scene confirmed that the Arabs left their identity cards at a nearby checkpoint because they had no permit to live on the grounds, but Civil Lands officers later said temporary permission would be given until the dispute is settled in the courts.

This constant favoring Arabs over Jews, every time, at every case, doesn't get to the ears of those Arabists that shed crocodile tears when a suspected Arab terrorist is --OMG! Can you believe it?-- checked by security personnel. Their obsession is to try to bash this democratic-oasis in the wild bloody middle east Islamic-(real) Apartheid anti-democracy jungle.

The Reality Show's website: http://lightonthings.blogspot.com

To Go To Top

BUT MUBARAK IS AN HONORABLE MAN
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 7, 2007.

Where Egypt stands in its anti-Israel vendetta: Arab nations may pretend to change but they never do. They merely allow time to drift by until all forget that, under the guise of quiet, they build their military forces for another war against Israel, hoping that this time, they will succeed.

Read this article by Yoram Ettinger. Should you wish to examine other issues of the Jerusalem Cloakroom and Ettinger's newsletters and OpEds on national security and overseas investments in Israel, please visit http://yoramettinger.newsnet.co.il.

Upon meeting Prime Minister Olmert on January 4, 2007, President Mubarak has been praised by Israeli and US policy-makers and media as a pro-peace, pro-US and counter-terrorism leader. Has Mubarak earned such a reputation?

Enclosed you'll find a brief on Mubarak's impact on vital US interests (Straight From The Jerusalem Cloakroom #126, February 16, 2003).

To update the February 16, 2003 document, one could highlight Mubarak's hate-education and fueling of terrorism via the systematic smuggling of surface-to-surface, anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles, explosives and terrorists into the largest terrorist base in the Mideast, Gaza.

THE INTENT OF THE $1.9BN ANNUAL U.S. AID TO EGYPT (over $30BN since 1980) has been to advance pro-US policies, to constrain anti-US elements, to promote regional peace, and to reduce proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. However...

1. FUAD AJAMI, a leading Mideast scientist, Johns Hopkins U: "THE USA COULD GRANT GENEROUS AID TO EGYPT, BUT THERE WOULD BE NO DAMPENING OF THE ANTI-AMERICAN FURY OF THE EGYPTIAN POLITICAL CLASS... On September 11, 2001, there was an unmistakable sense of glee and little sorrow among upper class Egyptians for the distant power, only satisfaction that America had gotten its comeuppance. After nearly three decades of American solicitude of Egypt, after the steady traffic between the two lands, there were no genuine friends for America to be found in a curiously hostile, disgruntled land... A free-floating anti-Americanism blows at will and knows no bounds, among Islamists and secularists alike. For the crowds in Karachi, Cairo and Amman, the great power could never get it right. A world lacking the tools and the political space for free inquiry fell back on anti-Americanism...There would be no open embrace of America, and no public defense of it..." (Foreign Affairs, 11-12.2001).

2. EGYPT HAS LED ANTI-ISRAEL INITIATIVES IN NGO's meetings, at the UN and in Africa, consistent with its anti-Semitic state-directed HATE-EDUCATION, media and clerical systems, which have been the role-model for PA's own anti-Semitism. Egypt has provided "safe passage" for terrorists and weapons smuggled to PLO's Gaza.

3. MUBARAK WAS LOBBYING WASHINGTON ON BEHALF OF SADDAM, in 1990, a few months before Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. He misguided key US officials and legislators, painting Saddam as a constructive ruler, thus facilitating US assistance to Saddam ($5BN loan guarantees, sensitive technologies, intelligence-sharing, etc.). In 2003, MUBARAK UNDERMINES USA WAR ON SADDAM, by convening a special session of Arab Foreign Ministers, intended to bolster UN, French, German, Belgian anti-US initiatives. Since 1991, MUBARAK HAS SYSTEMATICALLY VIOLATED ANTI-SADDAM SANCTIONS -- AS HE DID WITH ANTI-QADAFFI SANCTIONS -- expanding commerce with Iraq and Libya.

4. MUBARAK -- THREATENED ONLY BY DOMESTIC INSURGENCY WITH NO EXTERNAL THREATS -- HAS ACQUIRED MISSILE COMPONENTS FROM North KOREA, violating assurances made to Washington. Egypt-N.Korea ballistic cooperation started in the '70s. A ballistic missile production facility was set, in Egypt, by N. Korea, in the '80s. N. Korea supplied Egypt restricted chemicals in 2000/2001. Egypt developed -- with N. Korea -- a 500km range Scud C missile. Pyongyang's WMD effort has been advanced by the sale of ballistic technology and components (including engines of long and intermediate range missiles) to Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen. A few hundred N. Korean technicians are stationed in Egypt and Libya. EGYPT and CHINA cooperate in the area of nuclear research and remote-sensing satellites, development of long-range ballistic missiles and extraction of URANIUM in Sinai (AFP, 6.22.02).

5. MUBARAK REJECTS USA REQUESTS to interview dozens of Egyptian nuclear scientists and engineers employed by Iraq (Mideast NewsLine, 2.7.03). MUBARAK's INTELLIGENCE HOSTED (Jan. 2003) THE BAGHDAD-BASED ABUL-ABBAS, who commanded the Oct. 1985 Achile Lauro terrorism. Abbas was flown to Iraq, once extradition procedure was launched by the US.

6. ARAB NUCLEARIZATION HAS BEEN URGED BY MUBARAK's-CONTROLLED TOP CLERICAL INSTITUTE, AL-AZHAR (Egypt's daily, Al-Wafd, 12.15.02). EGYPT-RUSSIA TIES EXPANDED during Mubarak's April 2001 visit to Moscow: nuclear and laser technologies, missiles and intelligence satellites, advanced air defense systems, joint production in Egypt of the TU-204-120 aircraft (Stratfor, May 5, 2001). Poverty stricken Egypt is allocating 28% of its GDP for military expenditures.

7. A MUBARAK-QADAFFI INITIATIVE HAS UNDERMINED USA PEACE PLAN FOR SUDAN, which has enjoyed support of Sudan's non-Arab neighbors, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia and Eritrea (3 million killed, since 1969, in Sudan's Muslim-Christian civil war!). Egypt considers Sudan a domestic matter (its own province 19...), wishes to control the flow of the Nile, claims the Halayeb area in northern Sudan, and prefers a weak Sudan, which depends on Cairo. EGYPT and LIBYA have also cooperated in the development of ballistic technologies.

MUBARAK HAS EXACERBATED ERITREA-ETHIOPIA CONFLICTS, in order to bolster Egypt's clout in the Horn of Africa and at the sources of the Nile. "Divide and Rule" has also characterized Egypt's ties with Saudi Arabia and its historical rival, Yemen.

8. EGYPTIANS WERE EASILY RECRUITED BY BIN-LADEN, as a result of entrenched anti-Western incitement in Egypt's systems of media, clergy and education (e.g. Mohamed Atta of 9/11, the blind Sheikh Rahman of the 1993 World Center, Ayman al Zawahri who was Bin Laden's key advisor, etc.).

9. MUBARAK's-CONTROLLED MEDIA AND CLERGY REJOICED THE 9/11 TERROR, IMPLICATING THE USA, forcing US ambassador David Welch to publish a rebutting OpEd in Al-Aharam. Two weeks before 9/11, the Mubarak-controlled daily Akhbar Al-Yom, incited: "THE STATUE OF LIBERTY MUST BE DESTROYED..." "Congratulations, shouted Egyptians watching the incredible images of airliners crashing into the World Trade Center" (Agence France Presse, 9.12.01). On 8.17.02, Akhbar Al-Yom claimed: "RUMSFELD IS A MODERN-DAY HITLER." "CHENEY, RICE and RUMSFELD ARE THE AXIS OF EVIL" (ibid, 7.3.02). "You [PRESIDENT BUSH] are an evil person with an ugly soul...You are stupid and ignorant of world events..." (Dr. Adel Sadeq, chairman of the Arab Psychiatrists Ass'n and Head of Psychiatry at Mubarak-controlled Cairo's Ein Shams University, Egypt's Hadith Al-Madina, 4.23.02, via MEMRI).

10. MUBARAK's FOREIGN MINISTER, AHMAD MAHER, OPPOSES USA PLAN TO DEMOCRATIZE THE MIDEAST (official weekly, Al Mussawar, 1.10.03): "Powell's proposal [MEPI] is the epitome of idiocy... Our response to the US is -- 'examine yourself first, since you require a great deal of improvement'..." Egypt's media and officials consider MEPI "colonialism in disguise" and "Afghanization of Arab countries," consistent with their criticism of US sanctions on -- and bombing of -- Saddam, US bombing of Afghanistan and US war on Islamic terrorism.

11. VIOLATING BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, Egypt sentenced US citizen, Sa'ad Al-Din Ibrahim, a sociology prof. at Cairo's American University, to seven years imprisonment for allegedly spying for the US. Ibrahim has researched MUSLIM OPPRESSION OF EGYPT's CHRISTIAN COPTIC MINORITY. A retrial is pending due to US pressure.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

COURTESY OF SUCCESSIVE ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS SINCE THE FALL OF COMMUNISM
Posted by Boris Celser, January 7, 2007.

An awesome video you must see:

http://tinyurl.com/zvxas

The translation below is very interesting, because it fits like a glove with what has been happening in the world re. Jews and Israel. It is not about anti-semitism, it's about perceptions, ignorance, and it is the fault of successive Israeli governments, with people like Shimon Peres at the top. Anti-semitism falls naturally from it. It is not Arafat's fault, Hamas's fault, Ahmadinejad's fault, but it is the fault of the Jews, meaning many Jews, not all, starting with Israeli "leaders". It leads to more and more pressure on Israel and Jews abroad, whether from the international media, EU, James Baker, Jimmy Carter, Sue Blackwell, or Mary Jane Rosenberg and associated "Jews" and millions and millions more, convincing billions. It can only lead to annihilation once again. Win the military war and gain grudging respect, not love, from the world, or die.

To my mind the example below speaks volumes of the tragedy taking place. No Hasbara will work, it is too late, one can't do Hasbara against the whole world including the Israeli government. Pretty sad, I'd say.

I myself got kicked out of the distribution list of the Canadian Jewish Congress merely for expressing opposition to their position on the Red Cross/Red Crystal issue of a year or so ago. Not that I give a damn about the CJC. But they are supposed to be "my people". Yeah, right.

It started with the video above, an old one, based on a letter from an Israeli to the world. I'm translating a short e-mail dialogue between a Brazilian Christian called A, whom I don't know, and a Jew of Lebanese origin called S, a close friend of mine since 1970, when he landed in Brazil.

Draw your own conclusions below, please. I strongly disagree with parts of my friend's answer, too. They were very naive, but S can never convince A. Never. And S's assumptions are wrong, too. But haven't we seen all this before, over and over again? Well, apparently we have not.

Boris

Dear S,

I didn't like the video.

Since the Diaspora, when the Jews were sent around the world, the citizen with 2 nationalities was born.

I descend from the Portuguese, and we've been in Brazil for over 300 years. No one in my family has ever considered themselves Portuguese Brazilian, nor have they isolated themselves in Portuguese communities. But, surely, this is the main Jewish culture. Of course this is segregation and provokes segregation (chicken and egg?).

By forcing their entry into Palestine, and claiming Divine right to the Promised Land, the Jews have started a polemic that today leads to more segregation and violence. Israel is a country surrounded by Arabs and Islamists hungrier for revenge. None of the sides is right in this mess, but all of us are hostages of what could happen.

One day this will get out of control. An idiot will start a nuclear conflict, with immediate retaliation from the other side. I'm afraid that in this case the rest of the world will decide, also by force, to end this(if there's anything left). Another Diaspora ou serious extermination may occur. Is it worth it?

I symphatize with the Jews's saga, but I don't think it is correct what has been happening with the Palestinians. Whatever you say, you are gradually losing world support. In case of a serious conflict, no remaining sympathy will exist. Think about it. Why can't you live side by side in peace like we (Jews and Arabs) do in Brazil?

Regards and a great 2007 in peace. A


Dear friend A,

I regret your viewpoint and your concept on dual citizenship. I myself have triple nationality, I consider myself a world citizen, but I'm also a good Brazilian, a good Jew, and a good Lebanese, because although I love Brazil, which received me so well, I have not abandoned my roots. I've lived among different cultures and I've learned how to respect other people. To be a Jew is to respect another like I respect myself.

There is nothing more harmonious than to live within your culture while respecting differences, something that Arabs and Jews did very well in the Middle Ages. In Brazil, different peoples live in their own cultures and are well integrated. In Palestine, the present Arab government's goal is to destroy Israel. They use the media and distort their own religious precepts towards achieving a Great Arab nation. This is the core of all problems in the region.

To assume that the present world situation is due to the Jews is to distort facts and a mistake. The world could have been like when nature created it, no borders, but men were made different. There are men who favor war, and men who favor peace.

And since we are man of peace, I wish you my friend a great new year in good health.

S

Contact Boris Celser at celser@telusplanet.net

To Go To Top

THE BITTER FRUITS OF CORRUPTION
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 7, 2007.

In Israel, brilliant incisive minds who repeatedly report the facts accurately are usually ignored or denigrated by the so-called, self-declared intelligentsia. Instead, they swallow "whole hog" (hard to do in a Kosher country), the scribblings of journalists with a political agenda as in the doctrine of the Leftist Media of Ha'aretz, Ma'ariv, Idiot Ahronot, TV Channels 1 and 2.

When Caroline Glick brushes aside the Government propaganda and tells Israelis what is really happening, the typical Israelis simply close their minds because it is not what they want to hear. TV Channels 1 and 2 should offer Glick her own 15 minute talk show but, given Government control of the Media, I doubt that will ever happen. Too bad. I am reminded of the savage closing down of the Voice of Arutz Sheva by Arik Sharon so the nation would hear nothing of the Government planning. Please read on.

With the Israeli media scope-locked on bigger stories, the fact that Thursday Prime Minister Ehud Olmert paid an obsequious and shameful visit to a country which propagates Holocaust denial and sponsors the Palestinian jihad went largely unnoticed.

No, Olmert did not visit Iran. He visited Egypt.

Iran's Holocaust denial conference last month was roundly condemned in Israel and in the West -- as well it should have been. Not only is Holocaust denial intellectually and morally unacceptable. When undertaken by people whose stated desire is the physical annihilation of the Jewish state, Holocaust denial is also dangerous. Yet while everyone took note of the Iranian conference, aside from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, no one considered it disturbing when last week a sister conference organized by Egyptians who share Iran's aspiration to wipe Israel off the map was held.

Under the banner, "The Holocaust Lie," on December 27 the Egyptian Arab Socialist Party held its Holocaust denial conference in Cairo. The conference was broadcast live on Iran's Arabic language network Al-Alam. Its keynote speaker was party leader Waheed al Uksory. Uksory gained international prominence for being one of the few politicians whom the regime permitted to run against Egypt's dictator Hosni Mubarak in the 2005 presidential elections.

That psychotic and genocidal hatred of the Jewish people rules the Egyptian street no less than it dominates the leadership ranks in Teheran has made no impression on Olmert and his associates. Far from responding to the Wiesenthal Center's call to protest the conference during his meeting Thursday with Mubarak at Sharm e-Sheikh, Olmert and his colleagues devoted their time ahead of the summit to searching for new superlatives to heap onto Mubarak for his "responsible" leadership of the so-called "moderate" Arab states.

Israelis received a taste of that "Egyptian moderation" on Wednesday night. On the eve of Olmert's visit with Mubarak, Channel 2 broadcast a Hamas recruitment video displaying the terror training camps it has built on the ruins of the Israeli communities of Gush Katif.

One of the stars of the film was an Egyptian jihadist who arrived at the camp for weapons training. He was filmed standing in front of the Egyptian flag -- no doubt in a bid to demonstrate his country's great contribution to making "liberated" Gaza the jihadist wonderland it is today.

Prior to Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, Israelis were led to believe that the role Egypt would play in the area after the retreat would be quite different. Under Mubarak's iron fisted leadership, Egypt was then prime minister Ariel Sharon's ace in the hole -- the leg on which his entire strategy of surrender rested.

Sharon and his advisers promised the Israeli people that we could trust Egypt to prevent Gaza from becoming a forward base for global jihad. To help Egypt fulfill its responsibilities, Sharon even agreed to breach the central principle and strategic guidepost of our peace treaty with Egypt -- the demilitarization of the Sinai Peninsula. With Sharon's blessing, Egyptian military forces were deployed along the border with Gaza for the first time since 1967.

Unfortunately, Holocaust denying Egypt has not lived up to Sharon's promises. Not only have its military forces done nothing to prevent the mass transfer of weapons to Gaza. Egyptian authorities have enabled the inundation of Gaza with advanced weapons systems by allowing weapons shipments from Iran, Lebanon and other countries to be transferred from Egyptian ports to Gaza through the breached border which Egyptian authorities have done nothing to seal off.

And as the Channel 2 film showed, the Egyptian military also allows foreign terrorists to enter Gaza at will.

OLMERT'S VISIT to Sharm e-Sheikh yesterday is but one consequence of his government's overall foreign policy. Among its other guiding delusions, that policy is founded on the fiction of an Egyptian-Israeli alliance and friendship. It is this imaginary alliance that informs Olmert's belief that Israel has no need, and indeed no right to fight the burgeoning threat to its national security emanating from "liberated" Gaza -- a threat that has grown to strategic proportions largely as a result of Egyptian actions.

But then the public and the media both had bigger fish to fry than Olmert's imaginary friendship with Mubarak. This week in two separate developments, the illusions of competence and integrity in the IDF General Staff and in the civil service came crashing down.

First, following a two-day closed conference of the IDF's senior commanders, Tuesday night IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz held a disturbing press conference where he presented his assessment of the central lessons from the summer's war. Earlier that day, the nation awoke to the news that overnight the police conducted mass arrests of the country's top tax officials, leading businessmen, and Olmert's bureau chief Shula Zaken. The arrests were the result of their investigation of a suspected conspiracy whereby acting under Zaken's alleged guidance, the businessmen and tax officials conspired to defraud the Tax Authority.

Standing before the cameras, Halutz enumerated a long list of strategic, operational, tactical and moral failures that took place during the course of the IDF's operation against Hizbullah last summer. While Halutz didn't admit it, a common thread runs through the General Staff's failure to clearly define its war aims to the forces in the field; the Navy's decision to send the INS Hanit into battle against an enemy armed with missiles without turning on its missile defense systems; the decision not to mobilize reserves or launch the ground campaign until it was too late to make a difference; the decision to ignore precise intelligence regarding Hizbullah's intentions and locations; and the failure to destroy Hizbullah's short-range missile arsenal. The thread that links all these failures is Halutz himself.

Any doubt that Halutz is unfit to command the IDF dissipated Tuesday when he stated that one of his central lessons from the war is "that we need to redefine the concept of defeating the enemy." That is to say, since he is incapable of winning a war, he prefers to define defeat as victory and remain at his post.

No doubt to his great relief, Halutz's frightening display of arrogant incompetence was in the end relegated to the inside pages of the newspapers. It was hard to devote column space to the professional collapse of the IDF's General Staff when the heads of Israel's Tax Authority and Olmert's bureau chief were being shuttled from police interrogation rooms to the court house for arraignment. The media and police spokespeople have emphasized that Shula Zaken's suspected involvement in massive corruption does not mean that Olmert had a role in the conspiracy. But whether Olmert played a role in the scheme to defraud the public trust or not, Zaken's suspected role in the plot indicates that a culture of criminal corruption apparently flourished inside of Olmert's office.

ON THEIR surface, neither Halutz's press conference nor the tax fraud scandal are connected to the Olmert government's hallucinatory policies towards Egypt. But in fact they are inextricably linked. The fact that Israel faces unprecedented threats to its security and very existence while it is being led by the most incompetent, corrupt leadership it has ever known is not coincidental.

To understand why this is the case it is necessary to recall how the current leaders came to be in their current positions in the first place.

In 2003, Ariel Sharon and his sons found themselves on the brink of political, economic and personal destruction. Criminal investigations of their alleged corruption were coming to a head and it was widely predicted that Sharon and his sons Omri and Gilad would all be indicted on felony charges. A way had to be found to step away from the abyss. After advising with Sharon's personal attorney and chief of staff Dov Weisglass, Sharon and his sons chose to protect themselves by adopting the Left's irrational strategy of destroying Israeli communities and giving their land to terrorists. That is how the policy of retreating from Gaza and northern Samaria and carrying out the mass expulsion of Israeli citizens from the areas was born.

Sharon's moral and criminal corruption, like the strategic insanity and danger inherent in the decision to transfer control of Gaza to Hamas and Fatah, were self-evident. And yet, as Sharon predicted, the media, law enforcement and judicial authorities which are dominated by the Left chose to ignore the truth. Overnight the media transformed Sharon from the corrupt politician to the visionary leader. As Amnon Abramovich, Channel 2's chief commentator explained, the media understood that corrupt or not, their job was to protect Sharon to make sure he threw the Jews out of Gush Katif. And as Supreme Court Justice Mishel Cheshin admitted in an interview upon his retirement, the Supreme Court justices would never have dreamed of acting against Sharon lest they endanger the withdrawal.

Senior officials, cabinet ministers and the IDF General Staff first heard of the withdrawal plan from the media. Those who dared to question the retreat policy were distanced from positions of influence. Then national security adviser Maj.-Gen. (res.) Giora Eiland couldn't get an audience with Sharon.

Then the IDF's chief of general staff Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya'alon was fired. And so it was that Halutz, a good friend of Omri's and a good pilot by all accounts, was promoted to replace Ya'alon -- who although far more qualified than he to command the military, was far less obedient.

In the political arena, Sharon's advisers moved quickly to destroy his political opponents. Then finance minister Binyamin Netanyahu was demonized. Government ministers from Shas and the National Union were fired. In their place Sharon promoted obedient, opportunistic and inexperienced yes-men. So it was that Olmert and Tzipi Livni rose to the top positions in his cabinet.

In summary, Sharon's corruption caused him to adopt irrational strategic policies. Principled opposition to these policies voiced by senior public servants and politicians led to their removal from positions of influence. These competent public servants were then replaced by incompetents whose only qualification for their jobs was their total obedience to Sharon.

Sharon's defenders claim that he knew that the people he surrounded himself with after deciding to retreat from Gaza were incompetent to lead the country. But, they argue, Sharon did not foresee his stroke which placed these people in charge of the country. If he hadn't been incapacitated, they argue, everything would have turned out differently. Perhaps they are right. Perhaps not.

Whatever the case may be, the one obvious conclusion that can be drawn from the events of the past week and year without Sharon is that in order to forge competent, honest policies, Israel needs competent and honest leaders. And so to extricate itself from the morass of ineptitude and criminality that has become its public sector, Israel must find the way to rid ourselves of the current political and military leadership that embody both.

The good news is that we have an alternative leadership. It is made up of those principled public servants who were removed from positions of power for their refusal to deny the truth.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

IS PAKISTAN ALLY OR ENEMY? MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT; U.S. LOSING PATIENCE WITH UAE
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 7, 2007.

Secretary-General Annan has few accomplishments in his career. He is more noted for failures in Rwanda, Sbrenica, sex-for-food by peace-keepers, oil-for-food, favoritism for his son, protecting corrupt aides, failure in Lebanon, Syria, and Darfur, and failing to reform the human rights commission (NY Sun, 12/12, Ed..)

So many casualties! So many billions stolen! How has he managed to avoid jail?

As Annan prepares to yield leadership of the UNO, instead of slipping away in shame, he is using the opportunity to lash back at the US and more frankly bash Israel. He already rebuked the US for failing to uphold the ideals with which it launched the UNO, although he embodies the retreat from those ideals.

Annan's aides say he plans to accuse Israel of having driven Arabs out of Israel in the 1947 war, and then of occupying Arab areas after it. This devalues Israeli democracy, he claims, and causes the most suffering in the Mideast. He will denounce Israel for colonizing Arab territory. He also is said to plan condemnation of the UNO for calling too many "emergency" sessions to denounce Israel (Benny Avni, NY Sun, 12/12, p.6).

In the UNO, the US has been the most constructive force. It deserves credit for this.

The exception is when the US undermines Israel. Most people aren't educated and alert enough to notice this undermining, because they are distracted by the US refusing to endorse the more one-sided condemnations of Israel and getting criticized for doing so. The US prefers "balanced" condemnations of Arab aggression and false accusations against Israel. Thus it undermines Israel.

People condemn the Bush administration for alienating other governments. Refusing to endorse the more one-sided UNO condemnations of Israel is one way it alienates them. Bush's critics would be fairer if they acknowledged this and complimented it. In this practice, Bush is like other Presidents.

Annan doesn't know history. Israel did not drive the Arabs out, except for a few in strategic areas. Most fled on their own or were ordered out by Arab generals. Now most Arab host governments don't integrate them. Why doesn't Annan condemn them for not making up for this consequence of the war they forced upon Israel? I think Israel should be ashamed of not having driven them out. Those Arabs threaten not just the Jewish character of the state but the lives of the state's Jews.

Israel didn't occupy "Arab areas." Under the Palestine Mandate, those traditionally Jewish areas were designated for the Jews and still are unallocated. Unallocated, they are not "Arab." From there, Arabs made war on Israel, which entered in self-defense.

One reasonably could dispute who suffered more, the millions killed in Iraq-Iran wars, the hundreds of thousands purged by Arab dictators, the millions driven off, raped, or murdered by Sudan Muslim Arabs, or the Palestinian Arabs. It is not reasonable, however, to blame Israel for Arab suffering, because the Arabs initiated wars on the Jews and lost. Now that they run most of their own affairs, what do the Palestinian Arabs do with their opportunity? They steal and they fight among themselves and keep trying to conquer Israel. They cause their own suffering. Condemn them, Annan!

OLMERT'S MOUTH & ISRAELI NATIONAL SECURITY

PM Olmert has been blundering into statements that undermine national security. The latest one was an admission that Israel has nuclear weapons. For half a century, Israel had a policy of being ambiguous about it, leaving enemies guessing. Critics suggest he resign as not up to the demands of his job. Defenders now make light of his admission, saying it really was no secret (IMRA, 12/11). Or was he shrewdly warning enemies?

Here is the significance of his faux pas. When left ambiguous, Israel's enemies didn't pay that much attention to it. When Israel rubs their faces in it, now they must make a point of neutralizing Israel's advantage. They were striving for nuclear weapons, but now they would redouble their efforts. This is especially true in the absence of US or Israeli destruction of Iran's nuclear capability, also motivating Arab interest in a-bombs.

IRAN CLAIMS OBJECTIVITY

The President of Iran now isn't denying the Holocaust, he is asking whether it took place. He said, "Iran, as an unbiased state, would accept the truthfulness of the Holocaust if sustaining evidence is presented."

To find out, he assembled a who's who of Holocaust deniers (Steven Stalinsky, NY Sun, 12/12, p.6). Not likely they will come up with sustaining evidence nor that "unbiased" Iran would accept its truthfulness.

U.S. POLICY FAILING BECAUSE NOT SUPPORTED

The US gives $2.5 billion to Pakistan, but Pakistan let's the Taliban have bases within its borders. Afghanistan depends on the opium trade, but that same trade finances Islamist insurrections. The US Congress is appropriating funds for mycoherbicides that are said to be able to target just narcotic plants and destroy them. The Baker report ignored this means. The US would have to subsidize the Afghanistan economy until it can find substitute sources of income for narcotics (Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld and Alyssa A. Lappen of the American Center for Democracy, 12/11).

We'd have to be careful that the subsidy does not get stolen. Much foreign aid is.

DEAD SEA CANAL

The Dead Sea is drying up. With it would die the potash extraction industry in Jordan and Israel. Those two countries and the P.A. have reopened discussions about a proposal to build a canal that would ferry sea water from the Mediterranean to the Dead Sea. The project also would involve a desalination plant and a hydro-electric plant to harvest the energy from the downhill flow.

Israelis have hailed the plan as exemplifying cooperation to replace war. Jordanian Islamists oppose the plan as being a means of replacing jihad against Israel (IMRA, 12/11). My fellow Jews talk too much. First let the plan take effect and promote cooperation. Then praise the plan as showing the mutual benefits of cooperation.

OMITTED FROM THE BAKER REPORT

Should the US be responsible for rebuilding Iraq? According to Daniel Pipes, the Baker panel did not consider that. Their work was superficial (NY Sun, 12/12, p.6).

They spent much time and money, came up with nonsense, and ignored the real issues. They make Pres. Bush look good.

WHAT SYRIA LEARNED FROM LEBANON

Syria has declared that in a few months, it will raid Jewish communities or Israeli military installations on the Golan. It explains that it learned from the Lebanon War that war is more effective than diplomacy (IMRA, 12/12).

PM Olmert claims that his war effort taught the enemy to respect Israeli deterrence, but Syria deterred him from retaliating against its forces..

ISRAELI SUPREME COURT CHANGES LAW

The Knesset amended a law so that Arabs in the Territories, a war zone, may not sue Israel for damages. Earlier, the Supreme Court revised the amendment to allow them to sue, except if they are terrorists or incurred damages during an anti-terrorist raid.

Critics said this ruling turns Israel into a cash cow for a terrorist movement. It also is an infringement upon the legislature. The Court had assumed a right to interpret laws, but now it is amending them to suit its own legislative preferences.

PALESTINIAN CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: BREAK ACCORDS

The Oslo Accords obligate the P.A. not to punish Arabs who cooperate with Israel. The Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) advises the P.A. against complying with the Accords. It calls that obligation criminal, because the cooperators, whom it calls collaborators, aid an Israeli force that, it claims, commits war crimes (IMRA, 10/12). Some just performed ordinary municipal services for their own people.

Some human rights organization, that suggests violating the Accords that granted its people autonomy, and not protesting, at least in this press release, against the executions of accused collaborators, done usually without trial! It does not have much to say about the major P.A. method of fighting against Israel, which is by the double war crime of launching rockets at Israeli cities from P.A. cities and by other attacks on Israeli citizens, also in violation of the Accords. This is typical of the Muslims: sign an agreement gaining privileges, then stop complying with it and lie about enemy "crimes."

SEC. RICE WARNS SYRIA

Neither the US nor the "international community" would tolerate a reassertion of Syrian control over Lebanon, Rice warned. She anticipates a strong UNO resolution against Iranian nuclear development (IMRA, 12/12). What "international community?" What strong resolution by the irresolute Security Council?

WHY DOES IRAN STRESS HOLOCAUST DENIAL?

Iran also stresses its goal of wiping out Israel. In order to get away with perpetrating another Holocaust, Iran strives to deprive Jews of sympathy for the last one. Without such residual sympathy, the world would be more amenable to attacks on Israel, land of Holocaust survivors. Defaming the government and people of Israel, Iran prepares the world to abandon the Jews. The Nazis proceeded in the same way -- defamation followed by murder. Some of the same false accusations are made, others are purely Iranian in invention. As in Germany, the campaign is carried out by the state. It is a constant theme by the President of Iran (IMRA, 12/14 from MEMRI).

This antisemitism is organized, serving an evil purpose. Antisemitism is not rational.

CIVIL STRIFE SPREADS AMONG PALESTINIAN ARABS

>From gang shakedowns and clan feuds, lawlessness has turned into daily assaults by members of Hamas and Fatah on each other. The uncivil rivalry is spreading into the towns of Palestinian Arabs in Lebanon (IMRA, 12/14).

HOW MUCH TRUST BETWEEN ARAB & JEWISH ISRAELIS?

A poll found that most Jewish Israelis consider relations between Arabs and Jews in Israel to have deteriorated. Most Arab Israelis consider relations to be good.

The Arabs mistake Israeli openness, or willingness to interview politely Arab enemies of the state, as acceptance of the Arab enemy position. The Arabs also think that the brief reporting of Arab attacks indicates unconcern about them. What it indicates is that the media has a short attention span.

Dr. Aaron Lerner recommends that Jewish Israelis get the Arabs to understand that their hostile policies towards the Jewish state alienate the Jews (IMRA, 12/14). It doesn't alienate the ruling leftists.

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT

The Muslim brotherhood has established a militia. This militia keeps order at university demonstrations. Its members don't bear arms, but are trained in martial arts (IMRA, 12/14). Uh oh!

U.S. LOSING PATIENCE WITH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE)

The UAE has a vast container-port for trans-shipments. From there, components for explosives are shipped to Iran and Syria, for use in Iraq against US troops. The US has been discussing the problem with the UAE, demanding that the UAE monitor exports. The US is losing patience with stretched out discussions. It wants action. The UAE claims it does cooperate (IMRA, 12/15).

The US is notoriously impatient for negotiations to conclude. Other countries take advantage of that. Perhaps the US should conserve its economic strength, build military strength, and treat foreign negotiators' procrastination as hostile.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

ARE THE SHARKS SMELLING THE BLOOD IN THE WATER?
Posted by Dr. Steve Carol, January 7, 2007.

During the past seven years, Israel has taken a series of steps -- a series of miscalculations -- would be better phraseology, that in retrospect has emboldened its enemies. The unilateral Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon in May 2000 did not bring peace with that nation. To the contrary, it brought a terrorist organization, the Iranian-sponsored Hezbollah, to Israel's northern border committed to Israel's destruction.

In September 2005, Israel again unilaterally withdrew from territory, this time from the Gaza Strip. That move too, did not bring peace, or the establishment of a second Palestinian state. Instead it facilitated turning Gaza into a Middle East "terror central" and paved the way for the election of Hamas, another terrorist organization whose charter vows to eliminate Israel.

To make matters worse, Israel turned control of the Philadelphi corridor -- the Egypt-Gaza border -- over to Egyptian control with European "observers" looking on. Their mission was to monitor and control persons and material entering the Gaza Strip as a step towards promoting peace between the Palestinians and Israel. Something quite different occurred. Far from stopping or curbing the flow of weapons, munitions, money, and foreign fighters into Gaza, the Egyptians have facilitated such entry. They turned a blind eye to this movement and to the numerous underground tunnels under the frontier that enable even more terrorists to enter to continue their jihad against the Jewish State.

These steps without any real Israeli reaction other than verbal protests have emboldened Israel's enemies to press their attack further. Rocket fire from Gaza commenced, with rockets of ever-increasing range and effectiveness striking Israeli cities, towns and villages. The Israeli response was token artillery shelling of empty fields. The enemy pressed further. The kidnapping of an Israeli businessman was "rewarded" by the release of 400 terrorists from Israeli prisons. An earlier (Oct. 2000) attack on Israeli soldiers, who were subsequently murdered by Hezbollah, elicited no Israeli response. Their murdered bodies were finally recovered in Oct. 2004 but only in exchange for over 400 live terrorists. Israel's willingness to release large numbers of terrorist prisoners with blood on their hands sends the unmistakeable message that killing Jews no longer even guarantees imprisonment for any length of time.

No doubt that act encouraged last summer's twin terrorist attacks on Israeli soldiers both along the Gaza frontier and along Israel's northern border with Lebanon. Along the Gaza frontier the terrorists killed two Israeli soldiers, seriously wounded a third, and took alive, a fourth. In the north, terrorists killed eight Israeli soldiers and seized two others. The three Israelis taken are still in captivity and presumed alive, though no evidence has been produced. Haggling continues as to how many terrorists should be exchanged for the Israeli soldiers, with numbers being estimated from 900 to over 1,400.

Israel's poor performance in the Iranian-encouraged and sponsored war that erupted as a result of these attacks has empowered Islamofascist jihadists across the Middle East. They sense the Jewish state is faltering, being increasingly isolated, becoming marginalized by the U.S. State Department and threatened by the Iraq Study Group Report. The latter calls for Israeli unilateral territorial concessions to continue in Judea-Samaria including Jerusalem (that the Arabs call the "West Bank"), and the Golan Heights. Such appeasement does nothing more than further encourage Israel's foes. Israel's previous deterrent capabilities seem rapidly to be disappearing.

Now, even Israel's Arab population has come forth calling for Israel to become a bi-national state, to even change its flag and national anthem. Israeli Arab Members of Knesset have openly visited an enemy capital, Damascus, Syria, and endorsed the activities of Hezbollah. They encourage Israeli Arabs -- most of whom consider themselves Palestinian first and Israeli last -- to emulate the tactics of Hezbollah and Hamas. On Jan. 5, 2007, another Israeli Arab MK, Mohammad Barakeh urged the Palestinians to cease their internal feuding in Gaza, and unite against Israel.

Even a nation formally at peace with Israel -- Egypt -- has shown its true colors. The situation between the two nations has been described by many as a "cold peace." "Cold War" would be a more apt description. The Egyptian media and their educational system continue to turn out vehement anti-Semitic propaganda directed at the Jewish State. The Egyptian armed forces, largely equipped with U.S.-made weaponry (thanks to the largess of US aid) trains for a war against the named "enemy" -- Israel. Now encouraged by Israeli unilateral territorial concessions, Egypt has joined those threatening Israel's sovereignty. In the last week of December 2006, members of the Egyptian Parliament openly debated and called for the Israeli return of Umm Rashrash to Arab control. Since 1948, Umm Rashrash, then an isolated police post -- has been known as the city of Eilat, Israel's southern port on the Gulf of Eilat, what the Arabs call the Gulf of Aqaba. The debate, revolved not about whether Eilat is Israeli or Egyptian, but rather whether the site is Egyptian or Palestinian!

Sensing Israel's national malaise, its apparent lack of national will to take the long-overdue necessary basic steps to ensure its survival, the sharks -- Israel's enemies foreign and domestic -- smell the blood in the water. They are circling ever closer, prepared to move in for the final kill -- when they sense and choose the moment. The scene is eerily reminiscent of the dark days of late May 1967 as the Arab world mobilized for the final onslaught against Israel. In October 1973, Israel saw a similar set of circumstances. In the earlier case, Israel pre-emptively struck to save itself. In the latter case, Israel waited and nearly lost everything when the Arab attack was launched. Israel now, must return to the tactics of the past that worked so successfully in June 1967. It must regain a deterrent capability; it must demonstrate its will, its strength and its ability to survive.

Dr. Steven Carol is Prof. of Modern Middle East history (retired), Official historian of The Middle East Radio Forum www.middleeastradioforum.org, and Senior Fellow Center for Advanced Middle East Studies www.camesinfo.com Scottsdale, Arizona. Contact him at drhistory@cox.net

To Go To Top

ISRAEL MUST PREPARE TO DEFEND ITSELF IN A FULL BLOWN MIDDLE EAST WAR!
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 7, 2007.

No intelligent nation cedes land voluntarily, hoping for consequential peace, when facts on the ground suggest that nation's adversaries will settle for nothing less than 'wiping that nation off the map'. In other words Israel, tell pie in the sky peaceniks to stick 'The Roadmap', strewn with Israeli road kill, where the moon don't shine, and if present leaders are not of that mindset, make them former leaders by voting them out of office in early elections, the earlier the better! U.S. President George W Bush, attempting to rescue a legacy tainted by a dysfunctional preemptive Iraq invasion, is about to pull out all stops with a soon to be deployed formidable air, sea, and land surge to vanquish insurgents underwritten by Iran and Syria, inevitably leaving Israel to bear the brunt of retaliation from rabid dogs Hizbullah and Hamas, unleashed by mad dog AhMADinejad and his contemptuous crew of Mullahs. A true 'Roadmap' would not ignore volcanoes about to erupt, instigated by a militarily induced Middle East earthquake off the Richter scale, sending rivers of lava headed towards the imperiled Jewish State. A true 'Roadmap' would plot a strategic course to counteract this very real threat to citizens of a State fated to ever fend off Islamic fanatics infecting their geographic nightmare.

In a war, home field advantage is paramount. Witness Israel's recent perceived unsuccessful invasion of Lebanon attempting to vanquish Hizbullah, witness America's to date unsuccessful invasion of Iraq, witness America's erstwhile unsuccessful invasion of Vietnam. Guerrilla warfare, especially when guerrillas have little regard for human life including their own, are almost invariably losing propositions for invading forces, no matter how strong they are. Furthermore, Israel kicked butt big time in 1967 with its sovereign territory threatened by hostile Arab neighbors, and America booted out its 'taxation without representation' nemesis during its Revolutionary War vanquishing the British Empire. In these cases, human life was considered precious by the victors; Israelis did not use guerrilla tactics; yet both Israel and America were fighting for the preservation and independence of their homelands respectively. No doubt home turf inspires the spirit with a willingness to do what it takes to defend and enhance what is yours.

Considering all this, Israeli citizens need to overcome their Lebanon invasion caused funk, comprehend why they were unable to vanquish Hizbullah guerrillas willing to hide behind innocent civilian men, women, and children to deter intrepid Israeli troops they knew would be restrained by moral imperatives, and prepare once again to defend their homeland in an evolving full blown Middle East war. President Bush, with legacy on his mind, will not likely accede to more cautious Democrats and Republicans, will exponentially increase an aggressive American military presence in this most perilous region of the planet, and Israeli movers and shakers better wake up and prepare to defend their nation, a key attacked player like it or not in the upcoming conflagration.

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

YEAR OF THE DHIMMI
Posted by Michael Travis, January 7, 2007.

This was written by Hal Lindsey, the best-selling non-fiction writer alive today. Among his 20 books are "Late Great Planet Earth," his follow-up on that explosive best seller, Planet Earth: The Final Chapter," and " Everlasting Hatred: The Roots of Jihad." He writes this weekly column exclusively for WorldNetDaily. Be sure to visit his website, where he provides up-to-the-minute analysis of today's world events in the light of ancient prophecies.

When 2006 dawned, much of the Western world still believed in free speech. Until the Great Islamic Cartoon Riots in February.

A Danish newspaper printed a dozen editorial cartoons that were critical of Islam. Several connected Islam directly with terrorism. Worldwide Islam erupted in fury. Riots broke out on the streets of the major cities of Europe. At least 70 people were killed and 300 injured in the riots that followed.

Christians were targeted by rioting mobs and churches were burned. Fatwas were issued against European newspaper editors. The cartoonists went into hiding. The Cartoon Riots were the first of three major Islamic riots against the West in 2006.

In America, the global bastion of free speech, newspapers either refused to publish the cartoons or they pixelized Muhammad's face to avoid inflaming Muslim tensions here. CNN announced it wouldn't show the cartoons out of "respect for Islam."

Can you imagine CNN refusing to show irreverent cartoons about Jesus out of respect for Christianity? CNN wasn't demonstrating respect, it was caving in to fear. As were most mainstream U.S. news organizations.

In the fall, Pope Benedict quoted 14th century Emperor Manuel II Paleologus' opinion of Islam. The pope quoted Paleologus' statement: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

It prompted another global Islamic riot. The pope was burned in effigy across the Islamic world. More Christians were targeted for assassination. More Christian churches were burned.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad summed up the absurdity of the Islamic reaction, saying -- with a straight face -- "Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence."

Ahamdinejad then led a chorus or two of "Death to the pope" and "Death to the West" -- to demonstrate Islamic tolerance.

The pope soon apologized for quoting somebody else. He assured the Islamic world that he shares the Vatican teaching that "esteems Muslims, who adore the only God." To complete his apology, the pope went to Turkey last month where he prayed in an Islamic mosque.

I predict 2007 will be the year the West formally switches tactics from offense to appeasement. The Iraq Study Group proposes abandoning Israel and negotiating ways to appease Iran and Syria in an effort to dissuade them from destabilizing Iraq. One idea being floated is to force Israel to give back the Golan Heights.

Another is to pressure Israelis to abandon ambitions for a unified capital at Jerusalem. To minimize Israeli interference, the ISG recommends excluding them from the conference.

The mainstream media have by and large already capitulated to Islamic dhimmitude. Most have banned the use of the word "terrorist."

Some even refuse to mention Islam when reporting terrorism-related arrests. When Canadian authorities broke up a terrorist ring earlier this year, the Toronto Star lamented that fact the suspects were, "from all walks of Canadian life, with no apparent connection to one another."

It managed to get through the whole report without mentioning the fact every one of them were Islamic and three attended the same Toronto mosque.

In 2007, I predict that linking the words "Islamic" and "terrorism" in the same sentence will result in some court ruling declaring it hate speech not protected by the First Amendment.

And nobody from the ACLU will even notice.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

WAITING TO BE KILLED
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 7, 2007.

Both America and Israel are artfully avoiding action to eliminate Iran's nuclear capacity until it will be too late.

Each puts out disinformation propaganda that Iran is "several years away from being nuclear-capable". They base this on vague estimates about how many centrifuges it will take to make sufficient quantities of enriched uranium. What we are NOT being told is the amount of fissile material already purchased from the Russians both officially and through the well-oiled Black Market.

We had the opportunity of insuring that Iran could not either develop or purchase nuclear materials years ago. Instead, we played around with that crook and terrorist pacifier Kofi Annan and the U.N.

I am certain that we will have those infamous do-nothing, solve-nothing Congressional Hearings after a number of American cities experience nuclear explosions. Perhaps there won't even be time for those useless hearings if Iran manages to set off two or three suitcase nukes in the center of Washington. Irradiated and helpless Congressmen will scatter for treatment in various hospitals assuming the hospitals are operable or not massively overloaded.

We could have hit them by now and not have any American troops on the ground. Missiles and bunker busting bombs would leave what is left of the Iranian government with enough problems to keep them re-building for 20 years or more.

But, of course, we have to wait to talk it over, have conferences with the U.N., palaver with Putin of Russia and with China. No doubt they will be willing to talk and talk for years. After all, they are the suppliers to Iran and not the target, at least for awhile.

By all means let's talk to the Russians who will be convincing Iran to buy anti-ship, anti-air missiles so they can sink some of the American fleets gathering in the Red Sea and off the coast of Lebanon.

Of course, we could sink some nuclear mines off the ports of Russia and China which could go off if either interferes with the Iranian operation.

I wonder if our brilliant Think Tanks have contemplated that Iran already has operational nukes, purchased long ago when the Soviet Union collapsed. I wrote at that time that at least 4 to 6 tactical nukes went missing from the Soviet and East German weapons' depots. Naturally, the CIA floated a story that everything was in place and all was well with the world.

When Pakistan and India demonstrated their nuclear weapons' capability, U.S. Intelligence Agencies gasped and expressed astonishment that these two nations had secretly developed nuclear weapons.

I am also reminded of General Alexander Lebed who on a visit to America after his retirement spoke plainly about a hundred "kegs" (suitcase nukes) seemed to be missing from Russia's inventory. He was later killed in a helicopter "accident".

Could Iran have operational nukes? You bet. (Are you willing to bet your lives?)

Years ago I wrote about the collaboration of such nations as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Libya who collected sufficient funds for Pakistan to establish a nuclear development facility. If U.S. Intel knew they and the politicians choose to do nothing about it. Pakistan was to transfer either operational nukes or technology as payback for their investment. That happened through the infamous Dr. Abdul Qader Khan, the nuclear scientist who developed Pakistan's nukes. Dr. Khan visited the investing countries.

To conclude, if we do not destroy Iran's nuclear development facilities now rather than later, the radical Islamist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who threatens to "wipe Israel off the map", will not only achieve nuclear weapons capability but supply the likes of Hezb'Allah, Hamas among others with, at the very least, dirty bombs. So, it's now or never or die with the consequences of waffling.

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@interaccess.net

To Go To Top

BORDER AGENTS GOING TO JAIL FOR SECURING BORDER
Posted by News Max, January 7, 2007.

This comes from the Center for Individual Freedom (cfif.org).

Question: Thousands of illegal aliens -- many of whom are drug smugglers, gangsters and other criminals -- cross our borders every single day. But what happens to our brave border patrol agents who aggressively pursue and try to capture these criminals? Answer: 11-12 years in prison!

You read that right.

Two brave U.S. Border Patrol agents -- Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean -- are headed to prison for a combined 23 YEARS! Their sentences begin on January 17 -- less than two weeks from today!

Their crime?

Defending our nation's southern border against illegal alien drug smugglers.

In other words, these two men are going to jail for what Congressman Tom Tancredo called, "doing their job" -- securing the border.

Here are the facts:

Border Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean spotted a suspicious van on U.S. soil near the U.S.-Mexico border.

The van was being driven by an illegal alien -- Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila -- who was smuggling 743 pounds of marijuana into the United States.

When the illegal alien and drug smuggler saw Agents Ramos and Compean, he ran for the border. The agents heard gun shots while pursuing Davila on foot.

According to media reports, Davila at one point turned toward the pursuing agents and pointed what appeared to be a gun. The border agents fired their weapons at the fleeing illegal alien drug smuggler.

Davila was hit in his buttocks -- although Compean and Ramos apparently did not know it at the time -- and Davila didn't even slow down. He jumped into a waiting van and sped off in the night.

What happened next is so unbelievable, so outrageous that it should boil the blood of every American.

Apparently outraged that a foreign illegal drug smuggler was shot in the buttocks, Johnny Sutton -- U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas -- ordered a full-scale, no stone un-turned, investigation of COMPEAN AND RAMOS!

The illegal alien drug smuggler Davila received full immunity for his testimony against Agents Ramos and Compean. Not only that, he was given full medical care at an Army medical center in El Paso courtesy of U.S. taxpayers. As The New American put it:

"Incredibly, while agents Ramos and Compean and their families face economic ruin, emotional devastation, and real physical danger, as a result of that 15-minute chase, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila -- an admitted felon and drug smuggler -- has not only gotten off scot-free, he stands to become a rich man, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers. In a seemingly unbelievable turn of events, agents for the U.S. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security contacted the smuggler in Mexico and offered him complete immunity if he would testify that the Border Patrol agents Ramos and Compean had violated his civil rights."

We couldn't make this up if we tried.

Sutton charged these two heroes with Causing Serious Bodily Injury, Assault with a Deadly Weapon, Discharge of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence, and -- get this -- a violation of the "civil rights" of an illegal alien.

In other words, he threw the book at them.

What about the illegal alien drug smuggler you ask? DAVILA WAS AGAIN CAUGHT SMUGGLING DRUGS INTO THE UNITED STATES! And Sutton gave him immunity from prosecution from those crimes as well.

Please send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax Messages to President Bush and the leaders of the House and the Senate.

Contact NewsMax at newsmax@reply.newsmax.com

To Go To Top

BLAME THE JEWS
Posted by Delta Vines, January 7, 2007.

In a day where the whole world is more aware of terrorism than ever before, I am amazed at recent political ramblings. There seem to be some misconceptions; one being that terrorism has spread.

You see, terrorism has always been in the places it is now. Sometimes dormant, or latent, or active....but it's been there. The difference is now we are more aware of it's existence.

And we fear it.

Of course, no one wants to be terrorized. If we can package it, contain it, or blame it elsewhere, we do. Right now the place the majority of the world's leaders are laying blame is Israel.

It is from Israel they wish to exact a price. More precisely, many want Israel to just "go away". If there is no Israel, then the Arab countries and their extremists can't be mad. Then terrorism will go away. At least....that is the insinuated political rhetoric I've been hearing.

Our memories seem short, and our leaders seem blind. Saladin marched on Jerusalem when the country was still known as "Palestine", a name given by Roman Emperor Hadrian. Christian Crusaders marched against Saladin. Back and forth the armies struggled while Jews just wanted to live.

Palestine was what is now the area of Jordan and Israel. Since Jordan is larger, why don't the Arab population want a state there? (That is where Arafat wanted to start!) The reason, of course, is a political ploy. Blame the Jews. For 2,000 years Jews were blamed for everything. The cumulation of it was the terror of the Shoah/Holocaust. You would think we would learn better than to continue to "blame the Jews".

The Jews were blamed in the beginning of the Diaspora for the "murder" of Jesus. Over the years, everything from the Black Death, to economic devastation has been blamed on the Jews. Even now it seems that millions of lives of Jews and Christians during the Shoah was not enough.

They cannot have their own country in the land that G-d has given to the Jews. I know Islam believes Allah has given them the land. Islam began in the 6th century AD. Since the G-d of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob gave the land to the decendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob, it appears the Jews have first and foremost claim. The land, no matter the name, has always had a Jewish presence. Always.

So we blame the Jews for going home to the land of their birthright. It is a fraction of the land promised to them by the British. And now, it is the land that is being torn apart by daily Kassam rocket attacks from Gaza.

Fatah and Hamas are fighting and killing one another in the Gaza Strip, but, well, that is Israel's fault too. Israel and it's Jewish leadership uprooted Jews from their homes, without compensation, and evacuated the Gaza Strip so it could be totally "Palestinian". War, not peace, followed. Cpl Shalit was kidnapped by Hamas, and we are still waiting for his release.

Blame the Jews for Lebanon invading Israel and murdering soldiers while kidnapping two others. Blame the Jews for firing back when their homes were being destroyed, and their people being murdered. I know the Beirut bombing was a better newsbite. Yet homes in Haifa, Ariel, and other northern cities were hit by Katusha rockets from Lebanon. Israel is not the bully the press portrayed.

We blame the Jews, and before we know it, we will no longer have a stable ally in the mid-east, because Israel will be gone.

Then, who will be blamed?

In the words of Palestinian leadership: "First the Saturday People, then the Sunday people".

When they come after Christians, I guess we'll blame the Jews for not being there to take the blame.

Delta Vines writes that she "is a Bible-believing Christian Zionist. She lives with her husband of 20 years and their young adult autistic son." Contact her at vinebranch@earthlink.net or go to her website: http://www.tsofah.blogspot.com -- "Tsofah (On Watch!) The word 'Tsofah' is Hebrew for female scout, watchwoman, or point. It means to look out, keep watch, observe."

This essay was submitted January 05, 2007.

To Go To Top

OBSESSION THE FILM
Posted by Bruce Tuchman, January 7, 2007.

This is a frightening period in history which requires several very opposite responses: 1) the hopeful vision of our prophets for a world balanced by peace and justice; 2) caution when dealing with ideologies that hate in fairly equal measure Israel, America, Jews, mystics, women, and gays; 3) an honest intellectual understanding of religious triumphalism that exists in the radical sector of the Islamic world; 4) the awareness of the personal prejudices and bigotry that can infect any one of us; and 5) the intellectual skill to recognize false moral equivalencies when comparing the immoral actions of various nations, ideologies, and religions.

Take a look at http://www.obsessionthemovie.com/CNNdec15.htm which is the CNN review of a very important film called "Obsession" that has just been released. It is disturbing and eye opening. We should not be intellectually asleep at this time. Nor should we lose the hope and vision of our prophets. Nor should be afraid to criticize ourselves. Nor should we be fearful of naming the bigotry and triumphalism that has infected too much of the Muslim world. Nor should we make false equations between some of the foolish policies that we all want to see Israel change from within and the truly diabolic intentions of some of her neighbors (Syria and Iran in particular).

"I urge us all to study this important film -- both to critique it and to learn from it. L'shalom," --Rabbi David Zaslow

Watch this Video
www.powerlineblog.com/powerlinenews/video2/ ?bcpid=275898292&bctid=370328385

Contact Bruce Tuchman at bruce@nycat.org

To Go To Top

SDEROT: DISENGAGED
Posted by Zeev Shemer, January 7, 2007.

A barrage of Kassam rockets hit Sderot last night critically injuring Adir Basad, 14 and a second boy Matan Cohen. Adir is in critical condition while Matan is expected to be released soon. Defense Minister Amir Peretz will hold an emergency meeting to discuss the situation.

What will happen at this meeting? What will be asked? What solutions will be presented? Allow me to take a swing.

Peretz will ask his military advisors if they have been able to come up with a plan were Kassam rockets can be stopped without actually injuring the Palestinian 'civilians' firing them. Reliable sources say that this cannot be done, in which case Peretz will cry out to Abbas that he himself approved the $100 million that PM Olmert proposed to release to the PA, and therefore, they should stop firing those 'annoying' rockets. Peretz will point out that army blockades in the Judea and Samaria have also been dismantled and now terrorists will have different venues to conduct their war against the 'occupying' Zionists. Peretz will explain that they should be able to ease up on the rocket throwing without sacrificing their armed struggle. Sources say that Abbas will condemn the rocket firing (when he speaks to the media in his broken English), while applauding the Arab 'freedom fighters' in Arabic through his 24-hour PA TV transmissions.

Peretz will scratch his head and roll his Stalin-style moustache while complaining to his staff about their inadequacy in stopping those darned Kassam rockets. Iran's Ahmedanijead will send a comforting note to Peretz in which he details the effects of a nuclear explosion, and that in comparison, Peretz should be happy that only Katyushas, Kassams and Scuds have hit Israel so far. That should put a smile again in that face of his once more.

PM Olmert will be too busy trying to figure out how to sell his idea of giving the Golan to Syria to be bothered by the suffering of Sderot's population. After all, who really cares about a town that is so close to Gaza any way? There is still plenty of housing available in and around Tel Aviv. Oh wait, in case of a nuke attack, maybe they should consider Eilat as a possible alternative.

Sources also will report that one of Mr. Peretz's neighbors will ask: "Mr. FM, a few months back one of the security guards watching your house was struck by a Kassam, he lost both his legs. I believe you also had an 'emergency meeting', or were you just warming up?" To which our Defense Minister will say... "What meeting?"

Ze'ev Shemer
Ramat HaGolan

Contact Zeev Shemer at Zeev.shemer@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

RELIGIOUS FORGERY OF ISLAM
Posted by Steven Shamrak, January 6, 2007.

One of the most widely accepted ideas about Islam is the belief that "Allah" is one and the same as the God of Israel. Is it really true? Let put political correctness a-side and take a brief look at the history and facts.

Mohammed was born in A.D. 570 into the Arabian tribe of Quraysh (sounds very much like the root of the word Quaran). The tribe was in control of the city of Mecca, the town where pagan tribes would come to worship at the Kabaah stone, a pantheon where they kept all their gods and idols in the cube-like construction.

Mohammed proclaimed Allah, the widely worshipped moon god throughout ancient Mesopotamia, as the only true god. He chose a powerful god Allah from the many pagan celestial gods in order to accommodate the pagan population in Arabia (Like Christians before him, who put the story of the virgin birth of a popular Syrian god into the Bible and adapted the pagan tradition into Christmas and Easter). Allah was the prominent moon god, who was married to the sun goddess. The word "Allah" is a contraction of al-llah, an old Kaaba god. -- he was the top God of the pantheon of 360 pagan gods.

It is not surprising that Islam retained many aspects of paganism. It is heathenism discussed in monotheistic form. Muslims still make an annual pilgrimage -- Hajj -- to the black Kaaba structure, like the one where gods of the Arabian tribes were stored. Therefore, Islam is actually nothing more than the Arabic cult of a pagan self-professed prophet and the moon God of the Kabaah named Allah. Their claim to continuation of Judaic traditions is just a fake -- The claim to Jerusalem is political hypocrisy!

Since the first Kassam fell in 2001, almost 2,500 Kassam rockets landed in Israel with enormous psychological effect on Israelis, causing hysteria, anxiety and depression. When will it stop?

New Broom, Old Song: "If the issues with the conflicts between Israel and Palestine go well, other issues in the Middle East, including Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Syria, are likely to follow suit," said the new secretary-general of the UN, Ban Ki-Moon. -- 'Useless Nothing' at its best, Israel bashing, again!

Steven Shamrak was born in the former Soviet Union (USSR) and participated in the Moscow Zionist "refusenik" movement. For the last 3 years, he has been publishing internet editorial letters on the Arab-Israeli conflict -- independently, not as a member of any organization or political movement. He can be reached by email at StevenShamrak.e@gmail.com

To Go To Top

LETTER TO A PLURALIST
Posted by Michael Devolin, January 6, 2007.

Mr. BenDedek,

I'm finding it impossible to decipher your defence of what has always been, from the time of its conception until this present age, Islam's aggressive and violent manifestations by juxtaposing these manifestations with the past transgressions of Christianity and the so-called sins of "ancient Israel". Without mentioning the fact that Christianity has long since ceased from such barbarism as it precipitated before and during the Nazi Holocaust (an atrocious event in which the innate malevolence and anti-Jewish hatred of Islam has been exposed by scholars such as Martin Gilbert as having had a somewhat contributory function), and that "ancient" Israel ceased from its transgressions millennia ago, you go on, insouciantly I might add, to describe Islam's religiously incited "intent to overcome" (violently, and by means of terrorism is the sense in which I presented my point) as being "a natural event evident whenever the superior civilization encounters the inferior".

My question to you is: What, pray tell, in light of all the bloodshed attendant wherever the "faithful" of this religion choose to take root, would give you the impression that Islam's Muslims represent at this time in history a "superior civilization"? I can see none. I can see Darfur. I can see the Taliban. I can see Hezbollah. I can see Hamas. I can see the madman of Iran. I can see violence and division and hatred, even Muslim hating Muslim unto death, but I do not see anything faintly resembling those virtues that would constitute the Muslim masses of this world being deemed by you "a superior civilization". Nor can I extract from all these mental images any reason why Western civilizations -- any of them -- should be judged as inferior to those insalubrious cultures generated by the religion of Islam.

I would remind you here that "Muslims of different hues" more often than not kill each other within their native land, although prevented by laws from doing so without. It is this uniquely Islamic denouement to divisions of any kind -- answering societal forces with bloodshed and violence -- which we Westerners are most afraid is already one of the first installments of Islamic culture within our borders. What has always been Islam's most evident problem is its lack of unity. Bernard Lewis writes in The Assassins, "The first crisis in Islam came at the death of the Prophet in 632." This crisis was a consequence of the fact that Muhammad, in Mr. Lewis' words, "left no clear instructions on who was to succeed him as leader of the Islamic community and ruler of the nascent Islamic state". So began, from then until now, the homicidal animus between the Shia and Sunni Muslims sects. But the divisions between the Sunni and the Shi'a did not, in my opinion, give birth to the violence and bloodshed that has followed Islam through the pages of history. Rather, it has been the tenets of Islam and the numerous references in its Quran to violence and bloodshed as being the preferred method for resolving problems and impasses not only with other religions and peoples, but also for those problems and impasses which have always existed (since 632) between the different sects and "hues" within Islam. Muhammad 'Abd al-Salam Faraj, the ideological guide to those who murdered President Sadat of Egypt, wrote in his widely circulated booklet, "Fighting the near enemy is more important than fighting the distant enemy. In Jihad the blood of the Muslim must flow until victory is achieved."

The question must therefore be asked: As is evident from Islam's long history of violence, the Muslim has so little regard for the life of even his fellow religious, what measure of respect, if any, can the Christian or the Jew or the Hindu require from him? I know the answer to this question. The reason I'm writing to you today is that so many do not. And the Quran, if you read from its beginning to its end (as I'm sure you have), with its many calumnious references to Jews and Christians (e.g., "the descendants of swine and monkeys"), validates my answer in the negative.

Islam has never given birth to a "superior civilization". Quite the contrary. A religion whose every manifestation is linked in some way to violence and bloodshed should never be regarded as a contributing factor to any "superior civilization". The technological and scientific advances gained within the Islamic world before the advent of what historians refer to as the New Learning were not the result of the religion of Islam but rather civilized steps taken above and beyond Islam. Islam's contribution, both then as now, has always been detrimental to progress. As is the effect of the Muslim terrorists of today, Islam, from the time of its conception, has always been a disincentive against social equilibrium. My statement in one of my letters to Magic City News, clarifying that I rejected outright the religion of Islam, is the resultant evaluation of one who has observed that the anti-Jewish and violent manifestations of this visionary theorization far outweighs the barely miniscule good it has bequeathed to mankind, as exampled in those countries where it is the dominant religion.

I arrived at the point years ago, intellectually speaking, where I no longer expect Islam to redeem itself from its past and continuing shame; its historically tendentious pattern of violence and anarchy convinces me otherwise. As Thomas Friedman once wrote, "...because there has to be a dream which we all can relate to before its death is worth an hour on network television. When the Syrians kill thousands of their own people in Hama, it is not liberating or devastating for the West, because the West has no higher expectations of the Syrians and does not see any of its values emanating from Damascus." Which is to say, if a Western nation, whether predominantly Christian or Jewish, transgresses historically established convention or mores, whether military or otherwise, the West expects from that same nation a noticeable sort of penitence and repentance. In contrast, should a nation predominantly Muslim transgress historically established convention or mores, the West expects from that nation -- characterized by the internecine culture of Islam -- equivocation, cavil and denial, but never penitence nor repentance nor shame. That, as presently evidenced in Darfur, would be expecting too much. Islam, it would seem, is incapable of the honesty needed to wear the shoe that fits it so well.

"So our question is not whether there are good or bad people in every religion. The question is whether any given religion is likely to make one who believes in it a better or worse person than he would have been had he not believed in that religion." --Dennis Prager

Peace,
Michael Devolin

Contact Michael Devolin at devolin@reach.net

To Go To Top

ISRAELI ACHIEVEMENTS OF 2006
Posted by Max Yas, January 6, 2007.

The mainstream media gives the impression that all the Israelis do is kill Arabs -- preferably women and children -- or demolish Arab homes when not spending their days in bomb shelters dodging rockets.

However surprisingly, in 2006 Israel's economy grew by 4.8 percent, a rate higher than that of any country in the West. Inflation remained at zero and, for the first time, exports exceeded imports (by $2.2 billion). The Bank of Israel forecasts that next year this figure will reach $5.3 billion.

Foreigners accounted for 30% of the luxury market and for more than $1 billion in Israeli real estate, much of it in housing. Israel's booming real estate market is attracting big-name developers, such as Donald Trump who is planning to erect a 70-story Trump Plaza Tower in Ramat Gan, just west of Tel Aviv.

Highlights of Israeli achievements in 2006:

Israeli nanomaterial more powerful than a locomotive

Israeli company ApNano developed one of the most shock-resistant substances known, able to withstand pressures equivalent to dropping 8 diesel locomotives onto an area the size of a fingernail. It's so impressive that a European Union Commission has granted ApNano $14 million as part of a project to develop new composite coatings and lubricants based on their nanoparticles.

Johnson & Johnson looks to the future with Israeli science

Hebrew University's new partner, US healthcare giant Johnson and Johnson, has cast a vote of confidence for the Israeli university's cutting edge scientific research by investing in its work. According to a J&J executive, "These guys are pushing the science and if we put them next to our guys who are pulling the science... the result will be synergistic. We are going to have a lot of fun."

Israeli technology IDs traces of explosives

If it takes a rocket scientist to develop a high tech tool to prevent terrorists from carrying explosives on board an aircraft, then Ehud Ganani -- CEO of Israel's TraceGuard Technologies -- is in the right job. With a solid background in weapons technology, he is bringing TraceGuard's CarrySafe system to the market. By delivering greater speed and accuracy than current screening solutions based on manual checking, CarrySafe will make travel dramatically safer and more convenient.

Israeli start-up fights bioterrorism -- in real time

An Israeli start-up has developed a unique bioterrorism detection system that works like a smoke detector. The BAS101 technology sets off an alarm the instant it detects a biological hazard, such as anthrax, in the air. It identifies the agent on the spot, enabling officials to take immediate action instead of awaiting the return of test results from a lab. This is the first early-detection biodetector developed specifically for civil applications in public places.

Torino Olympics saved by Israeli snow-making technology

When Italy faced the prospect of snowless mountains only a month before the Winter Olympics, the organisers turned to Israeli water-valve manufacturers Bermad for their expertise in producing artificial snow. Let the Games begin!

Study shows Israeli elderberry extract effective against avian flu

Sambucol, an Israeli-developed elderberry treatment based on an old folk remedy has been proven, in new in-vitro tests, to be 99% effective against the avian-flu virus. While it is too soon to know if the treatment -- invented by world-renowned virologist Dr. Madeleine Mumcuoglu -- can cure avian flu in humans, British trials hold out hope that it may aid in stopping the spread of this disease.

Israeli start-up turns organic waste into energy

After you've enjoyed a tangy olive, don't throw away the pit. Thanks to the energy-saving technology of Israeli start-up Genova, the pits, along with other organic waste, could soon be providing a clean, green alternative to fossil fuels for heat and electricity production.

Israel's Brainsway stimulates a magnetic remedy for depression

Israeli company Brainsway has developed a non-invasive technique, deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, said to be effective in treating depression without the negative side effects. The technique has great potential for treating a wide range of other mental illnesses, including Alzheimer's, drug addiction, and schizophrenia, and could revolutionise the world of psychiatric care.

Landfill gas gaining popularity in Israel

Landfill gas emissions were first harnessed for energy production in Israel in 2002. Kibbutz Evron in western Galilee, where methane gas collected from decomposing trash produces about 1,000 kilowatts of electricity per hour, saves more than $300,000 a year in electricity bills.

Israel's life-sciences industry saving lives

Over the past decade, Israel's life-science industry grew by more than 16% annually (to $1 billion in 2006) and Israelis now hold the most medical-device patents per capita in the world. Notably, the 'PillCam', patented by Israeli start-up Given Imaging, has served more than 260,000 patients by allowing doctors to see a full-colour video of a individual's gastro-intestinal tract.

Israeli surveillance cameras help the US stay 'vigilant'

Israel's Vigilant Technologies is protecting Americans from crime and terrorism in dozens of locations around the US. In New York City alone, police have over 3,000 Vigilant cameras dotting the streets of Manhattan in what is probably one of the largest digital monitoring installations in the world.

Shalom from Max

Contact Max Yas at maxyas@shaw.ca

To Go To Top

SDEROT: A CITY IN CRISES
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 6, 2007.

This comes from Noam Bedein.

What most people in Israel do not understand is that we all live on Maccabees Street.

ONLY WHEN IT BLEEDS IT LEADS -- HEADLINES

What media covered the following?

A news story which broke in the HaAretz newspaper on Thursday, December 28th, 2006 confirmed that the mental health center in Sderot, Israel which provides services for trauma victims will be closed at the end of the calendar year, as of the coming Monday.

Dr. Katz is the only worker from the Municipality of Sderot who works in a full time job, and with no computer facilities, together with 2 social workers who work half time positions and another who works a 3/4 time position, and one more psychologist who visits three times a week.

Another psychologist maintains a half time position who was hired for 6 months and is supposed to be paid from "The Trauma Coalition" which is sponsored by the JDC. This psychologist travels all the way from Yerucham for the past four months, even though he has yet to be paid.

HOW FAST CAN YOU RUN IN 10 SECONDS

Running towards the sound of the explosion on a wet road, I arrived as an ambulance evacuated 2 boys, both ninth graders, 13 and 14 years old respectively, to the Barzilai hospital in Ashkelon.

There was a puddle of blood and a shoe right near the side walk, and 4 parked cars whose glasses had been completely shattered.

Another teenage boy was crying, speaking on his cell-phone, shivering as he explained to his mother what he'd just been through, and then he was evacuated with his friend standing next to him to another ambulance. They were both treated for shock.

A man who saw two boys writhing in pain after the attack had approached the boys and called the ambulance, after seeing that the bones were sticking out one of their legs, and the other one with a completely twisted ankle.

This 57th missile attack landed on Macabees Street in Sderot, which landed only 10 seconds after the siren.

Help get the word out about the suffering of the Jewish communities of the Western Negev

People are not seeing the suffering that people are experiencing here.

The missile attacks are described on Israel Government radio and Israel Army Radio in terms that remind one of a weather report: "Seven missiles fell today in the Western Negev. No one was hurt". or "Two missiles fell today in Sderot. No one was hurt. Five people were treated for shock". What these reports miss is the human drama of people throughout the Western Negev living in a situation of panic and constant fright, while Israel's Deputy Defense Minister declared on Friday that "there is no solution to terror and the missiles from Gaza", as if this is some kind of natural phenomenon.

On Thursday night, the staffer of the new Sderot Information Center for the Western Negev filmed the missile attack and its aftermath in real time. People running in all directions. A pregnant woman and her little girl being carried to an ambulance. Glass crashing in the stores that were hit.

Unfortunately, the quality of the video was not good enough for TV use. Our center simply does not have the digital or computer capability to transmit and send its material to the electronic media. And the suffering of a Jewish community under attack goes unreported.

Perhaps you could help us find some people who could sponsor the basics:

1. A computer and a laptop that we can use for electronic communications from Sderot.

2, A digital quality video camera which can film scenes in real time and communicate the images throughout Israel and throughout the world.

3. IF YOU HAVE WORKING EQUIPMENT TO DONATE CONTACT media@actcom.co.il and sderotmedia@aol.com TO SEE WHETHER THEY CAN USE IT,

The Sderot Information Center for the Western Negev maintains a US tax deductible avenue, with checks that can be made out to the Center for Near East Policy Research, POB 1783, Brookline, Mass. 02446-0014. or through bank transfer to:

Bank Transfer Information:
Union Bank of Israel, Ltd
Main Branch Jerusalem
Swift Code: Unbkilit 13-051
Acct. Number: 28142/45
Attention: Lawyer Trust Account of Jacob Golbert

Check this excellent site- http://sderotmedia.com/?p=58.

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

US DEPORTS IMAM FOR SUPPORTING TERRORIST GROUP
Posted by Michael Travis, January 6, 2007.

US deports imam for supporting terrorist group

A Muslim religious leader convicted of lying about his ties to a group labeled as a terrorist organization by the US government has been deported, immigration authorities said Friday.

Fawaz Damra, who served as imam at Ohio's largest mosque, the Islamic Center of Cleveland in Parma, was convicted in June 2004 of concealing his ties to the Islamic Jihad when he applied for US citizenship in 1994. He had been jailed in Michigan since then. (AP)

UK: Physician Suspended From Practicing Medicine For Criticizing Islam

And, get this, he didn't even specifically name Islam as the religion he was criticizing (from the Scotsman ):

Dr Mick Russon, who has been an associate GP at the Hillswick health centre since 2004, was suspended by the Shetland Health Board after he sent out a 46-page booklet, entitled Proclamation, to more than 200 people in the parish of Northmavine. The health authority took the disciplinary action after receiving a complaint from a member of the public. His case has now been referred to the General Medical Council.

The pamphlet makes no direct reference to the Islamic faith, but critics claim that Dr Russon's repeated references to a "Babylonian Moon God" and Satan are a thinly veiled attack on Allah and that he is asserting that Islam is Satanic.

Dr Russon states in the pamphlet: "Satan is the Babylonian Moon God; a cult that has become probably the most oppressive of women throughout time.

"There are probably more people worshipping the Moon God at this moment in time than at any previous time in the history of mankind; it is probable that most who follow him do so out of fear and not reverence.

"As each successive world empire has reached its height, it is largely the conflict between politics and finance that brings it down. We have seen this only too well in recent days, when the buildings that represented the centre of global trade were destroyed by those who carry the symbols of the Babylonian Moon God. I of course refer to the events now universally referred to as 9/11."

If you think about it, those who decided that he had criticized Islam by publishing this pamphlet were condemning themselves. For how could they have decided that he was criticizing Islam, if they did not themselves recognize Allah in the Physician's description of Satan?

ArabNews: Mohammed Ordered Killing of Slave Girls Who Mocked Him

Here's a very interesting piece in Saudi Arabia's English-language mouthpiece, ArabNews, about Mohammed's history as a warrior: The Prophet as a Man -- 108: War Preparedness. (Hat tip: Fjordman.)

Despite what the enemies of Islam say, particularly nowadays, and what impression some fringe groups of Muslim hard-liners advocate, Islam is a religion of peace, which prefers to live with all communities in an atmosphere of mutual respect and true understanding. However, Islam does not shrink from fighting a war imposed on it by its enemies.

The interesting part isn't the long discourse on Mohammed's great wisdom and prowess in battle, it's the last paragraph, which concludes with an offhand admission that Mohammed ordered slave girls murdered for no other crime than verbally mocking him:

Abdullah ibn Khatal used to be a Muslim. The Prophet once sent him to collect zakah from people who lived far away. He traveled with another man and a servant of his who was a Muslim. At one stage on the way they stopped. He gave the servant orders to slaughter a big goat and prepare food for him while he himself went to sleep. When he woke up, he discovered that the servant had not done anything. He killed his servant and, fearing the Prophet's punishment, reverted to idolatry. He also had two slave girls who used to sing for him and for his companions songs full of abuse of the Prophet. The Prophet's instructions specified that the two slave girls should also be killed. The man was killed as he was actually holding on to the coverings of the Kaaba. Abu Barzah Al-Aslami and Saeed ibn Hurayth Al-Makhzumi killed him along with one of his slave girls. The other managed to flee until someone sought a special pardon for her from the Prophet, which he granted.

This is held up as a model for Muslim behavior, and it's clear from the context that the author doesn't even recognize he's describing sheer savagery.

Outrage of the Day

The United States is going to give $86 million to terrorists who wish Al Qaeda success in attacking America and assassinating our President. (Hat tip: It Shines For All.)

The insanity never stops.

A group of armed men stormed a National Guard post on the Mexican border near Nogales yesterday -- and the National Guard ran away, which is probably the only thing they are allowed to do under their toothless rules of engagement. Here's a video report at Arizona's 12News. (Hat tip: LGF readers.)

Al Qaeda TV

Al Jazeera was just the forward wave of jihad media. No doubt emboldened by America's loss of resolve, we now have Al Qaeda TV, based in Syria and broadcast through a satellite operated by our friends the Egyptians.

AL QAEDA AND its allies now have their own 24-hour television station. Based at a secret studio in Syria, its signal is broadcast to the entire Arab world from a satellite owned by the Egyptian government. This development highlights al Qaeda's increasingly sophisticated propaganda efforts.

Al Qaeda placed great emphasis on communicating its message effectively throughout 2006. Osama bin Laden and deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri issued more tapes in 2006 than in any year since the 9/11 attacks. In the past, al Qaeda tapes were generally released to Al Jazeera, but 2006 saw more Internet releases: the terrorist group's message was thus more quickly disseminated. Al-Zawraa TV, the 24-hour insurgent station, is an extension of this trend.

Al-Zawraa hit the airwaves on November 14. According to Middle East-based media monitor Marwan Soliman and military analyst Bill Roggio, it was set up by the Islamic Army of Iraq, an insurgent group comprised of former Baathists who were loyal to Saddam Hussein and now profess their conversion to a bin Laden-like ideology.

The Islamic Army of Iraq is subordinate to the Mujahideen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Sunni insurgent groups, including al Qaeda in Iraq. The Al-Zawraa channel is not only viewed as credible by users of established jihadist Internet forums, but as a strategically important information outlet as well. Moreover, Abu Ayyub al-Masri, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, is delighted by the station. A U.S. military intelligence officer told us that al-Masri "has long-term and big plans for this thing."

Al Qaeda's previous attempts at setting up propaganda outlets have been limited to satellite radio and the Internet. Al-Zawraa, however, appears to be well financed and may find a much broader audience. The channel is broadcast on Nilesat, a powerful satellite administered by the Egyptian government. Through Nilesat, Al-Zawraa's signal blankets the Middle East and North Africa, thus ensuring that the insurgents' message reaches every corner of the Arab world.

UPDATE at 1/3/07 11:27:07 am:

This terrorist television channel is not new; it's been operating since 2005, but is just now getting attention. Here's a report from November of last year: Insurgent TV thumbs nose at ban. (Hat tip: Brian.)

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

AN AIPAC 'STRANGLEHOLD' ON US FOREIGN POLICY? HUH?
Posted by Neal M. Sher, January 5, 2007.

Fascinating, isn't it, to watch professors Stephen Walt (Harvard University) and John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) attain near rock star status by resurrecting the tired and discredited canard that U.S. foreign policy is dictated by a devious, dangerous and disloyal cabal known as the pro-Israel lobby -- sort of a Protocols of the Middle-Agers of Zion. Of course, the good professors are convinced that any policies advocated by the cabal are anathema to the interests of this country.

Moreover, it seems that bashing Israel and its U.S. supporters is good business, as the W&M boys are on the lecture circuit and have landed a lucrative book deal with a well-known publisher. Frankly, I'm surprised they didn't appear in "Borat," along with all the other anti-Semitic characters Sacha Baron Cohen has so masterfully exposed.

As the former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) -- the professors main target -- I've had more than a passing interest in what these characters have to say and how their arguments have been received and, in some quarters, blindly accepted.

The most detailed and devastating analysis of the Walt and Mearsheimer thesis comes from Alan Dershowitz, who documents countless examples of flagrant factual errors and twisted logic, which cannot be written off as oversights or even mere sloppiness; it is must reading for anyone who is even thinking about taking these guys seriously. It can be found at: www.ksg.harvard.edu/research/working_papers/dershowitzreply.pdf.

There are however, several fundamental points that simply cannot be ignored before one buys into the Pat Buchananesque nonsense that Israel and its backers control U.S. foreign policy. I have a confession: I wish most of what they said about wielding power and influencing public policy were true. But alas, like those other stereotypes about Jews being rich and controlling the media and the banks, it's just bubbe meises.

The hard truth is that while the pro-Israel community does wield some influence on foreign policy, recent history is replete with instances where, on issues vital to Israel's security, the United States has shown no reluctance whatsoever to exert strong pressure on Israeli leaders to adopt positions they believed would weaken their nation's security.
 

Consider the following examples that literally involve life-and-death issues:

The Bush administration, which likes to tout itself as the best friend Israel ever had in the White House, this month has pushed the Olmert government to reverse previous policy and accept 1,500 additional armed Palestinian troops to enter Gaza, despite alarm bells rung by Israeli defense and security experts who have seen Gaza become a breeding ground for terror, where tons of smuggled arms and explosives are stockpiled until they are turned loose on Israelis.

Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice also got Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to approve transferring thousands of assault rifles to Abbas's security forces; in the past when this happened, they often were turned on Israelis, not those they were supposed to be used against. Somehow, I don't think that this military buildup was high on the pro-Israel agenda.

Moreover, let's not forget it was Rice who insisted and exerted pressure to ensure that Hamas -- declared by our own government to be a terrorist organization and which refuses to recognize Israel -- be allowed fully to participate in January's Palestinian elections, believing that such "democratic" involvement would have a moderating impact on the organization.

We've seen the results of such foreign policy naiveté: Hamas thugs now wield unprecedented clout, and Israeli blood has been needlessly spilled. I, for one, certainly don't remember the pro-Israel cabal pushing to try to legitimize Hamas.

Speaking of Gaza, one of the reasons that area today -- long after Israeli troops and settlers left -- poses such a threat is Rice's refusal to allow Israel to secure the Sinai-Gaza border, insisting, instead, that that vital assignment be given to Egypt. The result: a porous border through which weapons, explosives and terrorists easily pass every day, later to be turned loose against Israelis.

There have been daily barrages of Kassam rockets, the most recent of which claimed at least one life -- ironically, a Muslim woman married to a Jew. Yes sir, score another one for those wily Israel supporters.

After Israel withdrew from Lebanon, the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution requiring Lebanon to control its border with Israel in order to prevent Hezbollah from re-arming, rebuilding its military infrastructure and gaining more power. Predictably, the United Nations did absolutely nothing to implement its resolution.

But the U.S. (and Lebanon) also stood idly by as missile, arms and explosives flowed into southern Lebanon and into the hands of Hezbollah thugs. Indeed, the Bush administration failed to enforce a proviso of the 2001 Foreign Relations Authorization Act, introduced by Rep. Tom Lantos (D-San Mateo), aimed at pressing the Lebanese government to take on Hezbollah.

Our government effectively turned a blind eye to the festering problem, ignoring Israel's warning that southern Lebanon was turning into a volatile Hezbollah stronghold; we saw the results last summer as Jewish blood once again flowed at the hands of terrorists. There it is, yet another piece of evidence that U.S. foreign policy is at the mercy of those disloyal American Jews.

Moreover, how can the Walt and Mearsheimer crowd possibly explain our government's decades-long policy of appeasement of Saudi Arabia, whose citizens, officials and institutions financed and orchestrated the Sept. 11 atrocities?

This in the face of irrefutable proof of Saudis' financing of least 50 percent of the current operating budget of Hamas; providing major financial support, for decades, to Palestinian terrorists; encouraging and inciting violence through Saudi Arabian government-funded textbooks used both in Saudi Arabia and in North American Islamic schools and mosques (including some in the suburbs of Washington, D.C.); using "charities" to fund Al Qaeda; radicalizing an estimated 80 percent of U.S. mosques through the advocacy of the Wahhabi form of Islam, and allowing Hamas to freely operate a command center on Saudi soil.

Despite all this, the administration has adamantly opposed all legislative efforts to hold Saudi Arabia's feet to the fire. Chalk up yet another victory for the pro-Israel conspiracy.

And don't think for a moment that the United States won't play rough with Israel. During the first Gulf War, concerned that any Israeli retaliation for the Scud terror missile attacks would jeopardize the U.S-Arab coalition, the State Department "urged" Israel to sit it out, even though it had been repeatedly attacked.

To bring the point home, the Americans made clear that unless Israel played ball, they would stop sharing the crucial "friend-or-foe" code information, which would have resulted in the downing of Israeli planes going near the war zone, no matter how many missiles Saddam fired at the Jewish state. That's what I call the hardest of hardball.

There is no question that AIPAC and the pro-Israel community are highly visible and can muster impressive displays of support, most notably on Capitol Hill. And it's no secret that their activists are sophisticated political players who have been instrumental in election defeats for politicians who had been hostile to Israel. But that is a far, far cry from proving that we have a "stranglehold" on American foreign policy. If we did, the above cited examples (and there are more of them) would have ended much differently.

Neal M. Sher, a New York attorney, is former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and former director of the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations. He can be reached at nsher@erols.com.

This article appeared November 24, 2006 in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles

To Go To Top

PROFESSOR GIL-WHITE'S INTERVIEW WITH NORWEGIAN MAGAZINE ARGUMENT
Posted by Jack Golbert, January 5, 2007.

Like so many others, Professor Gil-White started out pro-PLO and let the facts sway him to become strongly pro-Israel. That has brought him into confrontation with many of the "intellectuals" who know better but continue to distort the facts of the Arab-Israeli confrontation. He was interviewed by a Norwegian Magazine. Below are the question asked. They would form the basis for an article to appear in the magazine in January. For the answers, go to:
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/interview_argument.htm Contact Professor Gil-White at psych.upenn.edu

< 1) What proof do you have that the reason you were fired was your views on US policy towards Israel?

< 2) In Norway, and probably in most of the rest of the world, the perception of US foreign policy as being staunchly pro-Israel is absolutely unchallenged. How is it possible that this perception has become so widespread, if in fact the opposite is true?

< 3) The US practically always votes against UN-resolutions condemning Israel and financial support from the US to Israel amounts to something like $3 billion a year. Doesn't this prove that US foreign policy favors Israel?

< 4) Even though the US might have pressured Israel into accepting a PLO-state in the West Bank and Gaza, the situation seems to have changed considerably since Hamas became the most powerful political movement among the Palestinians. The US seems to work against the Hamas government and are urging other governments to follow its lead in boycotting Hamas. Is this a deceit? What is the real US policy on Hamas?

< 5) One frequently sees reports about the American 'Jewish Lobby' and how they manage to get their way with US foreign policy makers. Are these reports part of an attempt to make use of the traditional antisemitic myths about the hidden powers of a Jewish conspiracy? Are American Jews not really that powerful? Or is it that the most powerful American Jews share the agenda of the foreign policy elites?

< 6) The Norwegian historian Hilde Henriksen Waage recently wrote a report on the Norwegian role in the 'Oslo peace process' claiming that the Norwegians were heavily biased against the Palestinians and the PLO and in favor of Israel. Do you agree? What was the real Norwegian role in the 'peace process'?

< 7) In Norway most researchers and professors who work with the middle east tend to criticize Israel heavily, and I have the impression that the same thing is true about most of the 'western world.' Why do you think this is?

< 8) What is your analysis of this summer's war between Israel and Hezbollah and the current Hezbollah attempt to overthrow the Lebanese government?

< 9) Why would the US want Iranian dominance in the Middle East? And what proof do you have to support the claim that this is actually a goal for US policymakers?

< 10) Why do US policymakers want to destroy Israel?

Contact Professor Golbert at golbert@actcom.co.il

To Go To Top

GUSH ETZION RESIDENTS MARCH AGAINST HOSTILE ARAB VILLAGE
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 5, 2007.

Once again the Olmert Regime showed its fascist face as they sent Israeli police to stop the march to protest recent attacks against their homes and thefts by Tzurif, a hostile Arab Muslim village, known for its terrorist attacks and murders of Jews as early as 1948 with the infamous massacre of 35 Jews who were delivering supplies to the besieged Etzion bloc.

Instead of policing the Arab Muslims who stole cars, sheep, etc. with impunity, the police took the opportunity to beat up Nadia Matar, co-chair of Women in Green, known by many in Israel and around the world as the Jewish Joan of Arc, to arrest her and another protester.

We have seen this all before from the time of Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres who sent brutal police to beat unarmed older women and children, ride horses to trample them as they peacefully. Has the Government of Israel become a monster, by urging their police to lose all control and act like the savage KGB? The Israeli Police and Shabak (Secret Service) were once honored by the people who now see them as a dangerous, pathologically twisted force profiled and then hired for their brutality. These police and their comrades belong in prison rather than being loose among the public.

In addition, PM Olmert shows his hand of intentionally allowing the Arab Muslims to maraud in Gush Etzion with impunity, to make life intolerable for Jews and thereby to drive them out.

It is a great shame for the nation that Olmert and his thuggish Party continue the politicizing of the Police, the Shabak and the IDF (Israel Defense Force).

Please read the following from Arutz 7, then call & fax these officials:

Please Call or send hourly faxes to:
* Prime Minister Ehud Olmert: tel 972-2-670-5555 fax: 972-2-654-6717
* Defense Minister Amir Peretz: tel 972-3-697-5436 fax: 972-3-697-6218
* Minister Avigdor Lieberman: tel 972-2-501-2999 fax: 972-2-640-89-21
* Minister Eli Yishai: tel 972-2-666-2252 fax: 972-2-666-2909/7
* Police Minister Avi Dichter: tel 972-2-542-8504 fax: 972-2-542-8039

This is by Hillel Fendel, who is editor of Arutz-Sheva (www.IsraelNationalNews.com). This article was in today's Arutz-Sheva.

Some 150 Jews marched towards the hostile Arab village of Tzurif this morning. "If the police and army won't protect us, we'll have to do it ourselves," they said.

In the past week alone, Arabs from Tzurif -- famous for the many murderous terrorists who have grown up there -- broke into two homes in Bat Ayin Bet, stole two cars, and made off with 15 sheep. "If we don't stop this now," said one marcher, "it could easily reach much worse proportions, including murder."

The police arrested two people, including Nadia Matar, co-head of the Women in Green organization. Many witnesses said that they dragged her roughly over the ground and beat her.

"In addition," said one woman, Datia Yitzchaki of the former Gush Katif neighborhood Kfar Yam, "I can tell you they were specifically looking for her [Nadia]. Yesterday, when police came around to try to get us not to hold this protest, they specifically asked if Nadia would be there. And today, just seconds after they declared the area a 'closed military zone,' they ran after Nadia and dragged her to the car, hitting her all the while."

Michael Pollack of Hevron told Arutz-7, "The police and army claim that they don't have enough manpower to look for stolen cars in these Arab villages -- but today we proved that they have plenty of manpower: just to stop us, they brought out ten police jeeps, ten army jeeps and five special Yassam-force jeeps -- nearly 100 men in all."

"In addition," Pollack said, "they say that it's dangerous for them to enter these areas, and that they need special permission from their higher-ups -- but today, they came out to these areas with no hesitation."

Tzurif is remembered in infamy as the source of many cruel terror attacks, beginning in early 1948 ago with the famous "Lamed Heh" -- the 35 Jews who were cruelly butchered while on their way to deliver food and supplies to the Etzion bloc. In addition to the drive-by murder of Yaron and Efrat Ungar in 1996, whose two babies were left for Efrat's parents to raise, Tzurif murderers murdered three women in the Apropos cafe in Tel Aviv in 1997, kidnapped and murdered Sharon Edry in September 1996 -- his body was only discovered seven months later -- and committed the drive-by murders of IDF Dr. Oz Tivon and Sgt. Yaniv Shimol in Jan. 1996, and of Ze'ev, Uri, and Rachel Munk in July 1996.

The late Tourism Minister and IDF Maj.-Gen. Rehavam Ze'evi said in 1997 that the village of Tzurif deserves to be "wiped off the face of the earth."

"Whenever Arabs carry out hostile actions against Jews," Pollack said, "it's very important that there be a quick response. If we can't depend on the police and the army, then we won't wait and we'll do it ourselves. We don't need a repeat of past patterns."

Many of the marchers were able to evade the police forces who deployed to stop them, and made their way towards Tzurif. However, they stopped well before the actual village itself, in accordance with their previous plan, hanging up signs along the way. The signs said, "This is Jewish Land; no entry for the Arab enemy," and "Scaredy-Cat Army, Go into the Villages."

After arresting Nadia Matar, the police demanded that she sign a paper forbidding her to enter the area again. She refused to do this, however, and the police therefore took her before a judge in Jerusalem. The outcome of this encounter was not yet clear at press time.

Datia Yitzchaki said that MK Aryeh Eldad is aware of and involved in the situation, "and hopefully she will be released before the Sabbath."

Eldad commented bitingly, "The police and army that have not succeeded in stopping hostile Arab acts against the residents of Gush Etzion, have finally proven their strength -- by arresting Nadia Matar."

"It's important that people get used to the idea that they can walk freely all over the hills of the Land of Israel," Pollack said. "If this happens, there will be fewer murders and fewer thefts. It's a simple equation: If we don't walk there, the Arabs will ... Today, one of the people who came with us was a new immigrant from the U.S. who is now living with his family in Efrat. He told me that he now understands for the first time how important it is to actually get out and walk in these hills, and he plans to do it more often."

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@gwinston.interaccess.com

To Go To Top

GIVE US LEADERSHIP
Posted by Women in Green, January 5, 2007.

This was written by Isi Leibler and appeared in the Jerusalem Post January 2, 2007. Leibler chairs the Diaspora-Israel relations committee of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and is a veteran international Jewish leader. ileibler@netvision.net.il

Conflicting government policies relating to the so-called truce with the Palestinians are truly mind-boggling. What has unfolded over the past few weeks signals that our leadership has plainly lost the plot.

The pride of Zionism was that after 2,000 years of powerlessness the Israeli army could defend the Jewish people. In fact, our citizens' army did successfully repel the combined forces of all the Arab states seeking to annihilate us. Even now, in the wake of the blunders of our military and political leadership during the Lebanon war, the army of Israel remains the most effective military force in the region.

Yet over the past few weeks most of us have been aghast and enraged at the failure of the government to fulfill its primary responsibility -- ensuring the safety and security of the civilian population.

Our leaders entered into a "truce" fully aware that the Palestinians were incapable and had no intention of even trying to genuinely curtail the terror initiatives being directed against us. Our prime minister, Ehud Olmert, kissed Mahmoud Abbas, the duplicitous successor of Yasser Arafat, and proclaimed him a moderate genuinely committed to the illusory peace process. Yet this man, who hypocritically repeats the mantra that terror attacks harm the Arab cause, sustains a genocidal culture. He not only sanctifies suicide bombers; he personally introduced legislation to provide pensions for the families of the murderers.

To this day he adamantly refuses to intervene against terror initiatives orchestrated under his jurisdiction. His own "security" forces remain actively engaged in terror initiatives and are responsible for murdering more Israeli civilians than Hamas.

Hamas accepted the truce for its own, short-term strategic requirements. But at least its leaders were honest about their intentions, proclaiming that, at a time of their choosing, they would unhesitatingly resume the battle for the liberation of all Palestine.

The IDF bitterly opposed the truce and warned the government that Israeli civilians would be at greater risk and that additional casualties would ensue. Although following the inauguration of the "truce" the Kassam rockets continued raining down on Sderot and the adjacent region, the army was explicitly precluded by the prime minister from taking defensive measures against the terrorists even if they were observed actually launching missiles against civilian targets.

The pathetic rationale of our prime minister and foreign minister was to prattle on about the enormous, positive global "diplomatic benefits" and the "good-will" Israeli restraint was achieving.

FOLLOWING A series of near-disasters, including Kassams striking a kindergarten, and only after two youngsters were critically injured did the prime minister ultimately agree to permit the IDF to fire on terrorists -- but only if they were in the actual process of launching attacks. Even then he continued to deny the army the right to pursue killers after the missiles had been launched.

To top off this surrealistic scenario, the Palestinians warned that if Israel acted against the Kassam launchers, the truce would be ended!

Such shocking behavior not only disgraces our dysfunctional leaders. It reflects adversely on the entire nation.

If Israeli civilians in Tel Aviv or other major cities were under missile attack and the government insisted that the army stand by passively, the people would march on the Knesset and street riots would ensue. But apparently, if the casualties are "limited" and restricted to a border region like Sderot, this may be justified on the grounds that European politicians and even Egypt applaud us for the restraint we display while terrorists launch lethal missiles against our civilians.

Such callous indifference to the life and limb of citizens is shocking. It is of course utterly inconsistent with the sanctity of life and the obligation to defend oneself from murderers, both embedded in Jewish tradition. But even setting that aside, the fact is that other than the Palestinians and their allies, no other country in the world would, as a matter of deliberate policy, sacrifice civilians to promote diplomatic interests.

The world is now becoming accustomed to Israeli civilians being targeted by missiles, and when the day finally comes that we act we will probably be condemned for not continuing to stand by passively as our innocent civilians are killed and maimed.

But there is worse to come. We acquiesced to Gaza being flooded with new and devastating weapons, explosives and missiles via the porous Egyptian border. These arms may complement the Hizbullah buildup in the north. In addition, our government also deferred to the request of the Americans that Abbas's presidential guard be enabled to receive weapons knowing that, as in the past, it is virtually certain they will be employed against us.

And, of course, the Iranians are training and funding Hamas in the most advanced techniques of terror. They even provide financial rewards to those involved in Kassam attacks, with bonuses when Israelis are killed.

WHAT MUST the Palestinians think? They surely believe that Hassan Nasrallah was right when he described Israel as a spider web, lacking the backbone to protect its own citizens. Our enemies are becoming emboldened, celebrating the fact that whatever was left of our deterrence is disappearing. They are being encouraged to believe that by continuing to kill and maim women and children, they will ultimately force us to capitulate.

Our apparent willingness now to release large numbers of prisoners with blood on their hands "as a goodwill gesture" makes it clear that killing Jews no longer even guarantees incarceration.

How much longer can the people of Israel be expected to continue tolerating the outrageous spins and zigzags of our failed prime minister, or the crude rhetoric of our chameleon-like minister of defense using the media to castigate his prime minister? Or the vacuous outpourings of our foreign minister in defiance to Olmert, announcing that she intends to open an independent channel for negotiating with Abbas?

Other ministers also publicly argue with one another over crucial issues. And all this chaos prevails while our enemies gird themselves for war. Now, more than ever before, this country needs a coherent policy and a government which will speak with one voice and understand that the preservation of its citizens' lives and limbs represents its first priority. If our failed leaders are unable to move in this direction and get their act together they forfeit the moral right to lead the country. The madness must stop!

Ruth and Nadia Matar established Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green), an activist group of women based in Jerusalem. Their website address is http://www.womeningreen.org

To Go To Top

ABBAS: CAN'T STOP THE TERROR OR WON'T?---WON'T!!!!
Posted by Yid With Lid, January 4, 2007.

Ever since Abbas took control of the PA, people have been asking "why is there still Palestinian Terror?" Is it that Abbas can't stop it,or is it that he won't?

Abbas claims that he can't. If he could, he would really, truly, stop the the terror coming out of the West Bank and Gaza---but he just doesn't have the military juice to fight them--cross his heart hope to die.

Others disagree, they say he wont. They claim that the "moderate" Palestinian leader is just like his predecessor Arafat, acting like a public "peacemaker" for the world community and performing the role of terrorist leader behind closed doors.

World Net Daily published an interview with Abu Ahmed (the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades leader in the northern Gaza Strip). Ahmed gave the answer, he WON'T

Abu Ahmed, the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades leader in the northern Gaza Strip, told WND his group, including the militants launching rockets, is loyal to Abbas and coordinates "resistance operations" with the Fatah party.

"The Al Aqsa Brigades is the military wing of the Fatah and the President Abu Mazen (Abbas) is the chairman of the movement. We are committed to our leadership, to Abu Mazen. All our activity is in accordance with the political line of Fatah, which consists of fighting the occupation until the creation of a Palestinian state. The rocket shooting is part of this vision," Abu Ahmed said.

All rockets fired from Gaza have been launched from the northern part of the territory, which falls within Abu Ahmed's jurisdiction in the Brigades.

Asked why Abbas distances himself from Al Aqsa's rocket firing, Abu Ahmed told WND, "Listen, we are aware of our president's (Abbas') declarations but we are also aware of the international political system that brings the president to adopt this position."

The terror leader said Abbas never asked his group to halt the rocket fire.

"We know what is Fatah's general political line and we act according to this line and I can say that we were never asked to stop shooting rockets. Therefore, the rocket shooting is not in any way harming our loyalty and our commitment to [Abbas] and his leadership."

Abu Ahmed refused to address information released by Israeli security officials his group is financed by Hezbollah, but sources in the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades admitted they receive some funds and training from the Lebanese militia.

The Brigades sources also said they regularly coordinate their attacks with Mahmoud Dahlan, Fatah's strongman in Gaza.

"We are still totally committed to Fatah and [Abbas] regardless of help from other groups. The help is sanctioned by Fatah," a Brigades source said.

Some Israeli and Palestinian security officials told WND Fatah militants are launching rockets at Israel for internal political reasons.

Calm in Gaza favors the opposition Hamas government, said once Israeli security source.

"It gives Hamas a chance to govern during quiet times and not during Israeli operations in Gaza, during which the Palestinian take some frustration out on the Hamas government. Fatah wants violence and Israeli retaliation to generate opposition to Hamas," the source said.

But Abu Ahmed denied the accusations:

"This is totally wrong," said Abu Ahmed. "Our shooting is taking place when there are Israeli crimes, especially in the West Bank. Our shooting at the end of the day is directed against the Israeli enemy and aims first of all to clarify that we will react when our people and militants are hurt."

Both Israel and the U.S. State Department consider the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades to be a terror organization. U.S. policy calls Fatah "moderate" and dictates the Brigades is a separate entity, but still affiliated with Fatah.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, together with Islamic Jihad, has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis. The Brigades also has carried out scores of deadly shooting and rocket attacks against Israeli civilians in recent months.

All Brigades leaders are also members of Fatah. Many openly serve in Fatah's security organizations, including Force 17, which functions as police forces in Gaza and the West Bank. The U.S. reportedly has provided training, funds and weapons to Force 17.

Abbas last June appointed senior Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades leader Mahmoud Damra as commander of Force 17. Damra, who was arrested by Israel in November, was on the Jewish state's most-wanted list of terrorists.

How are the US and Israel reacting to the fact that Abbas is leading the rocket fire? By trying to prop him up. Forward.com is reporting :

U.S., Israel Seek To Boost Abbas With Prisoner Swap
Nathan Guttman | Fri. Jan 05, 2007

Washington -- Israeli and American officials are seeking ways to credit Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas with any Israeli-Palestinian deal on a prisoner swap reached in the coming days.

Israel and the United States are expected to agree to the release of leading Fatah activist Marwan Barghouti as part of the deal, viewing him as a potential reformer who can help Abbas. Barghouti was arrested in April 2002 by Israeli forces and is serving five life terms for aiding terrorism.

According to reports in the Israeli press, Israeli and Palestinian officials already have agreed on the main components of the prisoner-swap deal. Ha'aretz reported Tuesday that Israel would start off the deal with a release of women and children held in Israeli prisons in return for a video tape of Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier held by Hamas since his kidnapping last year on June 25. In the second phase, Israel will release 450 Palestinian prisoners, including Barghouti and Hamas political and military officials. At the same time, the Palestinians will hand over Shalit to Egyptian negotiators. In the third phase, which will take place two months later, Israel will release another "significant amount" of Palestinian prisoners.

The deal is being brokered by Egyptian Intelligence Minister Omar Suleiman, who met with Hamas leaders in Saudi Arabia last weekend.

While Hamas sources in Gaza described the deal as imminent, Israelis dismissed the report of an upcoming agreement as "Palestinian spin" saying that both sides have yet to agree on the number and identity of prisoners who would be released in return for Shalit.

It seems clear that under the deal being discussed, Palestinian prisoners "with blood on their hands" -- meaning those who were involved in terrorist attacks -- would be released. Senior members of both Fatah and Hamas would be included.

The main issue now troubling Israelis is how to present the prisoner swap to the Palestinian public as an achievement of Abbas rather than of Hamas. Since Hamas is holding Shalit, it is clear that the organization is playing a significant role in bringing about a prisoner release. At the same time, Israel does not negotiate directly with Hamas and is attempting to make clear that the Palestinian prisoners will be given over to Abbas rather than to the Hamas PM, Ismail Haniyeh.

"The whole issue of prisoners is very emotional for the Palestinians" said Nathan Brown, professor of international affairs at Washington's George Washington University and a former adviser on the drafting of the P.A.'s constitution. "Neither Abbas nor Arafat managed to get prisoners released. Now Hamas is trying to prove its effectiveness."

The main figure on the list of prisoners to be swapped is Barghouti, the unofficial leader of the second intifada. Though behind bars, Barghouti is seen as a major political force in Palestinian politics and is the co-author of the so-called prisoners' document -- a joint Hamas-Fatah platform that hints at accepting Israel and was supposed to lead to the formation of a national unity government. Barghouti is known for his good ties with all Palestinian factions, and stands out as the leader of the younger generation of Palestinians in a society still largely ruled by Arafat's old guard. Before the intifada began in 2000, Israelis saw Barghouti as a moderate interlocutor who favored coexistence.

"If released, Barghouti can force Fatah to go through a reform process which in the long run has the potential of strengthening the movement" Brown said.

Experts say that Hamas looks strong and generous by pushing for the release of Barghouti and other prisoners from the rival Fatah movement at a time when both factions are fighting over control of Gaza.

PROP UP ABBAS??????????

Now I am convinced the Prime Minister of Israel has totally lost any connection with reality. Lets forget for a second that he is rewarding terrorism. Doesn't Olmert read the papers? Yesterday a poll was released that said 70% of the population of Israel thinks he SUCKS.

PROP UP ABBAS?????????? Olmert is the one needs propping up. Yet the PM keeps writing his political obituary, and worse, possibly the obituary of his county by answering each terrorist missile with another concession.

This guy has GOT TO GO.

This essay is archived at
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/01/ abbas-cant-stop-terror-or-wont-wont.html

To Go To Top

ISRAEL'S COMING YEAR
Posted by Emanuel A. Winston, January 4, 2007.

With your patience for a moment, I would like to "play" Nostradamus (the seer of future events 1503-1566) -- but with questions instead of his prophetic quatrains.

Does Israel seem to be spiraling lower and lower as her Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Kadima Party and the Leftist quicken their pace to de-Judaize the nation? (Sadly, Yes!)

Will the example of Saddam Hussein's hanging for crimes against his own people be lost on Olmert and his confederates? (Probably).

Will non-accountability for failing to protect Israeli citizens grow exponentially as the practice of not making Government officials pay for collaborating with pledged enemies grows -- exponentially? (Yes!)

Will Iran manage to explode a nuclear bomb or a radio-active "dirty" bomb in Tel Aviv due to the Israeli government failure to protect the nation? (Highly probable!)

Will substantial deaths and injuries cause the populace to dispense with tedious in-Justice and a badly crippled court system? (Highly probable!)

Will summary executions take place, either without due process or through a Peoples' Court reminiscent of the Justice dispensed by Robespierre during the French Revolution? (I don't think so but, IF so many Jews have been killed due to a corrupt government more interested in placating their enemies and appeasing foreign nations, something equal to guillotine Justice may make an appearance.)

Will the United States State Department succeed in cutting ties to Israel under the guidance of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the returned Baker Gang? (No, but it will be greatly weakened as seen with the U.S. cut off of weapons' supply, technology and increased pressure to create a Terrorist State called Palestine. (Israel was re-named Palestine by the Romans after the barbarian Philistines to erase the names of Judea and Israel from this Land). Will President Bush use force to stop Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from generating numerous nuclear weapons? (There is a "Yes" and "No" answer to that.) Yes, IF Iran strikes Israel (G-d forbid), thereby providing the excuse to use American sea and air power to launch guided missiles. The "No" segment will be of a face-saving gesture on Iran's part of slowing down its production of fissile material and awaiting a later date to either use or threaten to use its nuclear weapons when the Democrats are in full control of the White House as well as the Congress.)

Israel, with respect to Iran, under the present government will be unlikely to do anything other than bluster and threaten. They will pretend to themselves and the public that they are counting on prior commitments or, at least, on the statements which have been made by the White House to shield Israel from Iran.

Do not be surprised that when the Arab Muslim nations and their Terrorist proxies attack Israel, Olmert and his confederates will dive for shelter until the Army deposes them from government office and takes over the defense of the nation -- or whatever is left.

Will the U.S. be hit by a nuclear weapon brought to America by the immigrating Muslims? (I think so.) Pat Robertson thinks so too but, for different reasons. The nukes will likely be brought in via containers through our many vulnerable ports or even inland if the containers make it through and are then trucked to one or more of our cities.

(Note the Tom Clancy scenario in "Sum of All Fears" where a neo-Nazi cabal organizes an Arab Muslim transport of a nuclear bomb by ship into the Baltimore harbor where it blows up.)

What will happen then? Whoever is President of America will have to order a retaliatory nuclear strike on Iran, Syria and whichever other nations have acquired the Islamic Nuclear Bombs. The FBI and CIA who have been heretofore caressing the Muslims entering America -- on orders of the State Department, will be forced to start seriously rounding up Muslims who intend to harm America in order to deport them. Leaders as in C.A.I.R., (Council on American-Islamic Relations) would likely go directly to local prisons or Guantanamo in Cuba for interrogation. Regrettably, it will be too late, as sleeper cells previously allowed into America by the Arabist State Department will begin hitting America's nuclear power plants, malls, subways, chemical plants, water sources, financial centers, airports and planes, etc.

Over the past many years I have opined that the U.S. would face numerous natural catastrophes. My reasons were merely that the Presidential Administrations and the State Department were forcing Israel to give up the Land in direct contravention of G-d's Word and Covenant with the Jewish people.

Others will see the super storms, drought, etc. as merely a scientific phenomenon of cyclical weather change due to global warming. I would add that, because those in power are pushing Israel toward defeat for the financial benefits of oil. That greed for money will, regrettably, cause the U.S. dollar to spiral down further. We will likely experience super-inflation -- not unlike Germany's hyper-inflation in 1923s where it took a wheelbarrow full of Deutschmark to buy a loaf of bread. The Arabs and China will start the run by dumping accumulated dollars for Euro currency -- even if it hurts their own country's economy.

Either way the U.S. is due and is already experiencing a ramping up of radical weather changes and de-valuation of the dollar which will deeply effect our bloated population. Watch what happens on the European Continent -- including Russia as it swings from freezing to boiling hot NOT seriously affecting their ability to grow enough crops to be self-sufficient in basic food. All of this ramping up of the world's troubles caused by 'homo sapiens' over the years will grow exponentially greater. Dinosaurs lasted over 160 million years but, at the rate modern man is destroying our environment, mankind is unlikely to last a fraction of that time. Whether we destroy each other in permanent war or simply poison the atmosphere we live in, clearly, we are on our way out as a destructive species.

The coming year for Israel and America will be telling!

Emanuel Winston is a commentator and Middle East analyst. His articles appear often on Think-Israel and Gamla. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a research associate of the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies (http://www.freeman.org/online.htm). Contact him at gwinston@gwinston.interaccess.com

To Go To Top

PEACE TALKS WITH SYRIA, WHEN SYRIA IS READY TO ACT, NOT JUST TALK
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 4, 2007.

To the Editor, San Franciso Chronicle

Ori Nir's "U.S. should encourage peace talks between Israel and Syria" (SF. Chron 1,3,07) is an excellent example of where that old adage, "half a loaf is better than none," really does not work.

Half a truth is often much worse than a lie. And Mr. Nir offers your readers even less than half a truth. In suggesting that Israel should be pressured to respond to Syria's recent whisper about perhaps being ready to maybe consider the possibility of looking in to the potential viability of some tenative negotiations, Nir forgets the following:

1. Syria supports the Hezbollah terrorist organization that just initiated a terror war of aggression against Israel.

2. Syria supplied Hezbollah with weapons and logistical assistance in that war, and continues to do so in high-handed defiance of the UN resolutions demanding that Hezbollah disarm.

3. Syria supports Hezbollah in its covert war against Lebanon.

3. Syria is working to re-establish its own illegal hegemony over Lebanon via its own and Hezbollah's operatives.

4. Syria hosts the el-Qaeda TV station, az-Zawra'a, which broadcasts 24/7 anti-USA and anti-Israel terrorist programming.

5. Syria hosts approximately 63 terror training camps which house and train up to 70,000 terrorist wannabees...whose main purpose in life is to kill Israelis and kill Americans.

6. Syria has sent, and continues to send, terrorists in to Iraq to fuel the terror war against the USA and against the democraticly elected Iraqi government. These terrorists have killed thousands of our soldiers, and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

7. Syria has been in close diplomatic and logistical alliance with Iran, a country that declared war on us in November, 1979, and has recently renewed that declaration via acts of terrorism against the USA and its allies, and via threats of a new level of terror war -- nuclear attack.

In short, Syria is a clear and unrepentant enemy of the USA and Lebanon and Israel, and is an active partner with both Iran and el-Qaeda in their war against the USA.

So, why does a terrorist-hosting country, currently engaged in an active terror war against us and against Lebanon and against Israel, suddenly start to murmur something vague about peace talks with Israel, even as it continues its support for Hezbollah, its aggression against Lebanon, and its steady stream of terrorists in to Iraq?

Because the USA pressure is working. Syria is isolated. Syria is weakend by the US diplomatic maneuvers against this enemy terrorist state.

So Syria must do something to get the USA to ease its diplomatic pressure. Syria must toss the USA some conciliatory bone to make our government think that Syria is not such a bad enemy after all....even while it continues to send it own to kill our troops and destroy any hope of Iraqi democracy.

In short, our diplomacy is working. Syria is being diplomatically pressed in to doing the things that the USA needs it to do in order to end, or at least attenuate, the threat that Syria creates.

To pressure Israel to accomodate Syria now would be a move in the exact opposite direction. And Syria's political gain from such a move would lend it greater strength in its own nefarious endeavours.

When Syria agrees to seal its border with Iraq, dismantle its massive terrorist infrastructure, jail terrorist leaders, disarm and disband terrorist groups, cut its ties with Hezbollah and Iran, withdraw its secret service forces from Lebanon, and rescind its declaration of eternal genocidal war against Israel, then it will make sense for the USA to pressure Israel to negotiate a peace treaty.

But then, it will not be necessary for the USA to pressure Israel. Israel has been begging Syria to do just that for almost 60 years.

Meanwhlle, it looks to me that Mr. Nir has been duped by Syria's conciliatory ploy. I hope that your readers are not.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

MORE NEWS FROM CHELM
Posted by Lee Kaplan, January 4, 2007.

If missiles falling on Sderot and Olmert releasing Fatah killers isn't enough for you, then how about this:

I wrote a few weeks ago about Scott Kennedy, the former mayor of Santa Cruz, California who is the "Middle East coordinator" at the Resource Center for Nonviolence (some call it the "Resource Center for No More Israel"), and his tour group of Israel-haters coming to Israel to gather some more propaganda film footage to show at the RCNV and in many American communities about the horrible genocide Israel is committing against the poor, oppressed Palestinians. Kennedy's RCNV repeatedly holds anti-Israel ISM training events and anything that supports the destruction of the Jewish state.

Israeli security agencies were tipped off to Kennedy's entourage's arrival, with flights and names of those in the group.

Kennedy, just before his last visit to the Holy Land, arranged! for the present mayor of Santa Cruz to give the key to the city to a PLO "diplomat" who promptly told those 300 Jew-haters in attendance that Israel is a terrorist state and that the Hizbullah are noble liberators. Then, he organized his Fellowship for Reconciliation group of anti-Israel radicals for a November tour to meet with Arab groups, Israeli communists and anarchists, and to gather photos to make presentations about why Israel must be dismantled to become an Arab-dominated state.

Kennedy's Fellowship for Reconciliation was denied entry to Israel in 2002 due to suspected subversive activities, so it's not like there wasn't a precedent to keeping them out. But the Israeli government, in true Chelm fashion, allowed them in again.

Sigh....

So, what did Kennedy promptly do once inside Israel? He visited Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority leader. He mentioned that the Israeli border control was a little suspicious of him and his group, but they let him go anyway (just like letting ISM subversives in at Ben-Gurion airport even when those security agencies have information about their arrival).

Yup. Even though the US government says private American citizens are not supposed to be in contact or do business with the Jew-killing terrorists of Gaza, Scott and his entourage made a bee-line for Gaza to meet with their allies in Hamas. No problem.

Scott then returned to Santa Cruz and promptly wrote a long article on the RCNV website about what a "kind and thoughtful person" Haniyeh is and how sincere the Hamas is about peace with Israel. Scott even claimed (as missiles tore off the legs of some kid in Sderot and killed a Muslim Israeli woman) that the Hamas only wants peace and is the victim of Israeli intransigence. (You can read about Scott's wonderful meeting with Haniyeh and the responses from some of my team at www.StoptheISM.com.)

Scott even bemoans the "1.5 million hostages in Gaza." A strange figure, since Gaza's population is only about one million. It's a funny thing about Israeli "genocide" of Palestinian Arabs. They are always being "wiped out," but somehow their number grows exponentially whenever one of the Arabs, or their anarchist or communist allies, writes about their "right of return."

Kennedy tells people that Hamas has no ill will toward Americans too, despite Hamas videos and statements that America is the Great Satan and enemy of Islam. Hamas terrorists have killed American state department officials bringing Fulbright Scholarships to Palestinian Arabs. Those scholarships allow the recipients to attend American universities -- where Scott and his ISM buddies can work with them to indoctrinate the next generations of Americans with the idea that Israel must be dismantled.

Then, Scott insists that the Hamas would gladly live in peace with Israel and stick to a "ten-year ceasefire." Of course, Scott ignores that ten-year ceasefires by Hamas match that recorded in the Koran, whereby Mohammad made a ten-year truce with his rivals until he was strong enough to wipe them out; and he did so, breaking the ceasefire early. Scott doesn't tell American audiences how Hamas has violated every ceasefire thus far within 24 hours by shooting missiles at Israelis.

And, oh. yes, Scott says Israel has never made a peace offer to the Arabs. The deportation of 8,000 Jew from their homes and businesses in Gaza was no peace offer, and the missile barrages that followed from Hamas terrorists and the kidnapping and murder of Jewish soldiers were merely reflections of Arab "goodwill." The Hamas Charter specifies no compromise from murdering and driving Israel's Jews out of "Muslim lands."

Scott does his dirty work in the USA in his constant seminars and programs, where attendees, mostly non-Jews who never read the Hamas Charter, are constantly bombarded with false tales of Jewish persecution of Arabs and even Christians in the Holy Land. Scott explains to them that the Hamas are really nice guys, "thoughtful" and "peaceful" individuals who don't hate the Jews and only mean everyone well. It's those atrocious Israelis who won't make peace. And he even gets into synagogues with his baloney.

If you think this stuff won't do more damage to Israel's survival in the next ten years than all the terrorist attacks, think again. You can fight Hamas on the battlefront, but once enough young Americans are indoctrinated by the likes of Kennedy and his RCNV crowd that Hamas is a great humanitarian organization and that Israel is a rogue state, you can forget all support from the US and watch the wolves gather around even more.

Count on American support waning in the future. Not because Americans hate Jews or Israel, but because they are too busy following how Britney Spears went out for the night without underpants.

Why did the Israeli government let Kennedy and his group into the country? Why was he allowed to visit with Hamas? And why don't the Israeli security services complain to American security agencies about him violating the laws in the US about dealing with Hamas? Curious people concerned about Israel's future want to know -- before we find out about Britney's latest escapade.

As you put your children to bed tonight in Israel, be aware there are people in America like Scott Kennedy hard at work seeking to prevent America from being Israel's closest and necessary ally. They seek to stop all aid to your country and they enable the Hamas to kill you.

Kennedy, the wannabe communist, wants your children dead if that's what it takes to get Hamas what it desires -- the destruction of your Jewish state. The real question is: What are the Chelmites running Israel thinking when they let this guy and his entourage of creeps into the state and allow him to meet with Hamas?

Contact Lee Caplan at leescaplan@yahoo.com

To Go To Top

BRENT SCOWCROFT -- BOY ANTI-CON
Posted by Michael Travis, January 4, 2007.

This was posted by admin at
vwt.d2g.com:8081/2007/01/brent_scowcroft_boy_anticon.html

It's always so damned disappointing when those who have solved an overarching riddle, even if it may have been by just showing up, think that the same kind of solution mechanisms reveal the answer to a new conundrum. In today's NYT Mr. Scowcroft, the National Security Adviser for the end of the USSR, and a damned good one for that moment, holds forth once more in Bush41esque security rationales.

As expected, it not only disappoints, but fails, stupendously to recognize the hideous reality that we are engaged in a war.

Diplomacy is that process which becomes of use in dealing with your enemies after force of arms have reduced their ability and will to make war to that of a desire to survive.

This is why diplomacy failed in 1936, failed in 1941, worked in 1945 and is failing today.

Consider this absurd bone formed of words reshaped to mollify the "Israel is Czechoslovakia to the Iraq Study Group idiots" -- harridans of doom (I am one, btw):

Resuming the Arab-Israeli peace process is not a matter of forcing concessions from Israel or dragooning the Palestinians into surrender. Most of the elements of a settlement are already agreed as a result of the negotiations of 2000 and the "road map" of 2002. What is required is to summon the will of Arab and Israeli leaders, led by a determined American president, to forge the various elements into a conclusion that all parties have already publicly accepted in principle.

This is a stupendous HALLUCINATION, sir

The 'Arab' forces YOU refer to are 'controlled' by the leaders of the the nascent Palestine. The leaders of the nascent Palestine believe what god has given to their care, ALL OF THE LEVANT, cannot be negotiated away by man for any purpose, good or bad. The leaders, via a free and fair election, DO represent the will of the arab peoples who live there. The leaders are plain spoken about this, and not only unabashed, but also proud of their stance.

THE END. The parties have not only NOT agreed agreed to any process at this juncture, but one of them, via their elected and biblical mission is irretreviably linked to the end of the other MORE than Tojo and FDR. The process YOU refer to today is in fact now the wishful thinking of a more naive antiquity.

If you read the OPED carefully, Mr. Scowcroft does not call for any Israeli concessions (that has already, via the ISG been shown to be quite stupid statement), he has swallowed hook line and sinker the argument that solving the Israeli Arab dispute solves the riddle of peace and stability.

A vigorously renewed effort to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict could fundamentally change both the dynamics in the region and the strategic calculus of key leaders. Real progress would push Iran into a more defensive posture. Hezbollah and Hamas would lose their rallying principle. American allies like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the gulf states would be liberated to assist in stabilizing Iraq. And Iraq would finally be seen by all as a key country that had to be set right in the pursuit of regional security.

In his incredibly accurate new book HAMAS Mat Leavitt not only shows the proud connection HAMAS has with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is also proud to be a worldwide movement with quite specific aims, but also quotes from historic and present HAMAS leaders that theirs is not a regional movement.

Moreover, it is impossible to wonder what Mr. Scowcroft smokes in his leisure time, when looking at the public and historic words and actions of Hizballah, especially those of its wildly and undeniably popular leader, Hassan Nasrallah.

Mr. Scowcroft demonstrates a very Talleyrandish ideal that these leaders and movements are susceptible to swapping motivations (certainly swapping some leaders would make a difference but unfortunately, like Musharraf and Mubarak, they are 'on our side', if such a thing can be said with a straight face).

HAMAS and Hizballah spent generations educating their children before they had military capability as to who the real enemy is.

It's you, btw, Mr. Scowcroft.

Israel is the little satan. A colonial outpost of the great one, and main enemy, in this dialectic.

Today as a result of our ignoring them, they represent true political and popular power, and have near majority, or frank majority support.

Unfortunately, your success against the national worldwide enemy, the USSR, has rendered you into Lord Beaverbrook against the highly effective dawa of the islamist theofascist deen today

Oh, there's some value there, but you have missed the essential truths of today. Frankly, I find that frightening. There are many reasons why.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

PEDDLING BAKER'S PAPERS: MORT KONDRACKE ON THE BAKER-HAMILTON PANEL
Posted by Carl Sesar, January 4, 2007.

Mort Kondrake wrote an article called "The Baker-Hamilton panel can solve domestic issues, but not win wars" December 19, 2006. Kondrake is the executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. This is the version that appeared in the Examiner
http://www.examiner.com/a-464361~Morton_Kondracke__ The_Baker_Hamilton_panel_can_solve_domestic_issues__ but_not_win_wars.html

BALTIMORE -- Now that the graybeards on the Baker-Hamilton commission have proposed consensus solutions for the Iraq war, they should be kept on to tackle entitlements, energy policy, health care and education -- domestic issues more appropriate to bipartisan deal-making. Seriously.

The prestigious Iraq Study Group, headed by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., did a magnificent job of reaching unanimous agreement by splitting differences and finding middle-ground solutions.

A bipartisan panel of such distinguished elder statesmen could very well outline the "grand bargains" it will take to break domestic logjams.

For instance, to finance the retirement of the baby boom generation and achieve long-term fiscal balance, we need a deal by which Democrats agree to shave promised Medicare and Social Security benefits and Republicans agree to increase revenues.

It's just the sort of thing that former Democratic White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta and former GOP Sen. Alan Simpson, Wyo. could put their minds to. The same goes for education. Democratic lawyer Vernon Jordan and retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor could fashion and sell the bargain under which teachers get more pay but have to accept being promoted, hired and fired on the basis of performance.

War is another matter. The Iraq Study Group -- composed entirely of civilians -- basically produced a plan designed to split the differences between America's hostile political factions, not produce victory in Iraq.

By design, in fact, the group's report does not mention President Bush's oft-repeated goal -- "victory" -- or the common Democratic term, "quagmire." It proposes to achieve "success" in Iraq, using Bush's new definition: An Iraq that can sustain, defend and govern itself and serve as an ally in the war on terrorism. It avoids Bush's old goal, democratizing the Middle East.

The panel dismisses all three of the most politically disputed strategies for Iraq -- "precipitate withdrawal," "staying the course" and "more troops for Iraq" -- in exactly 14 lines of type each.

Then, it recommends a "way forward" that calls for removal of all U.S. combat troops by early 2008, "subject to unexpected developments in the country."

But it also envisions maintaining a "considerable military presence in the region," including unspecified numbers of combat troops in Iraq for force protection, training and anti-terrorist activity.

As the report suggests, Bush needs to gain leverage over the Iraqi government to induce it to work toward national reconciliation and to eliminate sectarian militias from its security forces.

The Iraq Study Group wants to use threats of withdrawal of economic, political or military support.

In the end, that may be necessary. But first Bush should try -- and is trying -- to persuade Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to reform his government and oust radical Moktada al-Sadr in favor of moderate Shiites. And when Bush meets with Sunni leaders, he should tell them: If we have to, we will side with the Shiites and Kurds, who account for 80 percent of the population, so you had better cooperate with the government rather than trying to bring it down.

On the diplomatic front, Baker believes that it's possible to "flip" Syria from being an enemy of the United States and an ally of Iran and turn it into a force for peace in the region.

Baker told me in an interview that he believes Syria would give up trying to topple the government of Lebanon, stop supporting Hezbollah and persuade Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist if it could get back the Golan Heights, which have been occupied by Israel since the 1967 war.

Bush should appoint Baker as a special envoy to Damascus to see if he can bring that deal to fruition. I doubt Syria would trade its territorial ambitions in Lebanon for the Golan, but Baker would deserve a Nobel Peace Prize if he could produce a lasting agreement.

Even Baker and Hamilton admit that Iran is not likely to be a constructive player on Iraq, but they nonetheless advocate "dialogue." It won't work.

Bush was right to welcome the Iraq Study Group report. It was the politic thing to say. But he has to fashion a new policy to try to win this war. Retreat -- and failure -- will be catastrophic.

Mort Kondracke writes: "Baker told me ... Syria would give up trying to topple the government of Lebanon, stop supporting Hezbollah and persuade Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist if it could get back the Golan Heights, which has been occupied by Israel since the 1967 war."

First, the Golan Heights isn't "occupied" by Israel; it's a part of Israel, annexed after the 1967 war. For respected professional Mort Kondracke to say that the Golan Heights is occupied territory serves only to spread worthless misinformation.

Next, what Baker told him about Hezbollah and Hamas sounds all fine and dandy, it's what everyone would wish to think. But let's say Syria actually were to get the Golan back, would it manage also to persuade itself to recognize Israel's right to exist? Baker didn't say, Kondracke didn't ask.

Then Kondracke suggests "Bush should appoint Baker as a special envoy to Damascus to see if he can bring that deal to fruition. I doubt Syria would trade its territorial ambitions in Lebanon for the Golan, but Baker would deserve a Nobel Peace Prize if he could produce a lasting agreement."

Once and for all: put the Golan Heights in Syria's hands, Israel is doomed, and, "F_ck the Jews" James Baker knows it. His Iraq Study Group touting talks with Syria is a scheme to that end. Julia Gorin also makes this point in her JWR article, "ISG: Israel Should Go."
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin122106.php3

Only useful idiots don't know it, and Mort Kondracke may or may not be one. "I doubt Syria would trade its territorial ambitions in Lebanon for the Golan ..." is a gem of stunning insipidity. Of course Syria won't "trade" Lebanon for the Golan; it'll gladly pocket the Golan, keep going after Lebanon, support Hezbollah, and bombard Israel from the strategic high ground just as before.

But the dark notion that "Baker would deserve a Nobel Peace Prize" by f_cking Israel, it takes the cake for perversity. Though, come to think of it, adding James Baker to a list of proven liars like Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, and Shimon Peres, would be perfectly fitting.

Mort Kondracke's not likely to change his mind; he thinks peace in the world depends upon Israel. You hear it in Europe, the Arab nations, Iran, etc., it's accepted wisdom: Israel must make painful sacrifices, die in fact, for peace. Truth be told, the death of Israel is to Europe a good enough end in itself, but, to the Arab/Muslim world, a glorious beginning for the greater war to come.

So, let's get right down to it: would the world be better off without Israel? This sordid question has wormed its way into normal, everyday conversation, and, embedded in the very asking is its tacitly agreed upon answer: yes.

Kondracke, peddling Baker's papers, brings that would-be "better" world one step closer.

Contact Carl Sesar at carlsesar@gmail.com

To Go To Top

ISRAELI ARAB DEMANDS; ARAB EXCUSE FOR CORRUPTION; MUSLIM WORLD'S ATTITUDE
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 4, 2007.

UNIFIL-HIZBULLAH AGREEMENT

UNIFIL and Hizbullah have a tacit arrangement. If Hizbullah is discreet about the weapons it is not supposed to have, UNIFIL won't perform its supposed function of disarming Hizbullah. The commander who admitted it is from Italy, which has commercial deals with Iran, Hizbullah's patron.

Syria smuggles not only weapons to Hizbullah, but also people, to attend the Hizbullah demonstrations in Beirut, to overthrow the government (Benny Avni, NY Sun, 12/11, p.5).

"INTERNAL U.S. ISSUES"

PM Olmert advised his government to avoid commenting on the Baker report, because, he said, it involves "internal US issues" (IMRA, 12/10).

The report suggests a regional conference about Israel without Israeli representatives and suggests that the US buy Syrian goodwill by demanding that Israel relinquish the Golan (a part of Israel formerly of Syria) to Syria. Those hardly are internal US issues. They are internal Israeli issues.

You see that the government of Israel does not work much with the pro-Israel lobby in the US, explaining the dangers and benefits to Israel of various US policies. Israel leaves the impression that it can be pushed around without protesting.

ISRAELI ARAB DEMANDS

Israeli Arabs have issued a set of demands, including: (1) Veto power over national decisions; (2) Proportional "representation" in all government institutions; (3) Change the flag and national anthem from a Jewish orientation to bi-national; (4) Rebuild Arab villages abandoned or paved over as a result of the 1947 war, and move Israeli Arabs into them; and (5) Let Arab immigration equal Jewish immigration.

Changing the flag and anthem would mean ending Israel's status as a Jewish state. Moving Israeli Arabs around would multiply points of friction (and legitimize the Arabs' 1947 war on the Jews). Equalizing immigration would enable hundreds of thousands of Arabs to enter and take over the country.

Israel must not and would not accede to those demands. Why make them, then? They are made to rally Israeli Arabs against the Jewish state as if they were an aggrieved and oppressed minority, to struggle against that state, and to perpetuate a cause for conflict in case Israel were to reach a final agreement with the P.A. (IMRA, 12/10 from Haaretz).

To consider government institutions as representing different ethnic groups is divisive.

Veto power over national decisions would enable the Arab fifth column to cripple national defense. It is not democratic but confessional politics, what cripple Lebanon and Iraq.

There is no living with the Muslim Arabs. They keep striving for power, like some science fiction monsters. Wisest course is to freeze them out until they get out.

ISRAELI SUPREME COURT APPROVES TARGETED KILLING

What is "targeted assassination?" It is one of those usually undefined terms, left undefined so it can sound worse, to the uninformed (most educated and uneducated people). It refers to Arab terrorists, who embed themselves in civilian populations to make it difficult to capture them without a firefight that would endanger neighbors. The IDF finds out when they are more isolated in a car or at home, and strikes the car or building. The IDF usually targets for the assassination terrorist commanders, bomb technicians, or terrorists whom it knows are on, or soon to go on, a mission of terrorism.

NEWS BRIEF

Five years ago, some Israeli leftist organizations petitioned the Supreme Court against the government policy of targeted assassination of terrorists. A law firm, Shurat HaDin that supports national defense submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the policy.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the policy as being within international law and not disproportionately harmful to civilians compared with the military advantage. Since no Israeli law covered the matter, the Court, according to law, fell back on Jewish Law, which considers self-defense paramount and imperative. As the brief pointed out, Israel has a right to a pro-active defense.

The Court added a caution that the Israeli mission should strive to reduce civilian casualties. Shurat HaDin wishes the Court would not restrict the military. It feels the Court is (as that anti-Jewish, secular body that disdains to rely on Jewish law usually is) too merciful to the cruel, meaning that the civilian population is cruel and wholly supportive of terrorism (IMRA, 12/14).

Israel has to decide whether it should fight back hard against a people wanting genocide against it, or treat them as welfare clientele. While Israel worries about heeding international law, the rest of the world accuses it of being heedless and the Arabs heed law not.

The Left is dangerously unpatriotic, preferring vicious Arab civilians over innocent Israeli civilians. In a war for survival against Islamic genocide, the Left's attitude is dangerous.

ARAB EXCUSE FOR CORRUPTION "And when, in March 2001, Baath party members asked Syrian vice-president Abd Halim Khaddam at a public meeting why the regime did not do more to solve the problems of corruption, incompetence, and the slow pace of reform, his answer was that the Arab-Israeli conflict permitted no changes at home. 'This country is in a state of war as long as the occupation continues,' he said." (Barry Rubin, 12/11 from Middle East Forum News.)

I've long heard that the Arabs blame their problems on Israel. This is evidence of that. The excuse makes no sense. Neither does the Arab policy of making war, except as Islamic ideology and for that excuse.

LIBERALS FOR DICTATORS

The Baker panel recommends accommodating certain Arab dictatorships and even feeding them pieces of Israel. The panel treats Iran and Syria as having reasonable regimes susceptible to persuasion by the "Great Satan." How silly and dangerous!

The recommendation has some liberal support (as by the NY Times), though Mr. Baker, himself, is not liberal. Liberals long had argued that the US should not support dictatorships, including Arab ones. Have they become so anti-American and so antisemitic, that they make this exception?

In the past, at least the Communist dictatorships were somewhat "progressive," providing education, health care, and women's rights (Hillel Halkin, NY Sun, 12/12, Op.-Ed.).

Mr. Halkin starts his articles with a good point and then spoils them with a ridiculous one. This time he forgot his usual plea for Israeli withdrawal, since he is contesting the Baker proposal for one that obviously could get Israel destroyed. This time, he inserts the nonsensical notion that Communist dictatorships were somewhat progressive. Women had the right to be repressed as much as men. Education was necessary, though limited to "safe" subjects, so the people could swallow the propaganda and keep count of the millions the regimes murdered. Many countries provide health care, but few have the life-shortening practices of the major Communist countries, referring to pollution as well as purges and formerly of poverty, too. A practice that is done to assist dictatorship is not "progressive."

THE MUSLIM WORLD'S ATTITUDE

Muslims, particularly the Arabs and Iranians, have adopted Nasser's failed attitude, except he was more nationalist and they are more Islamic. They find the US and Israel irresolute, and consider them weak. Defiant, they gain prestige from war, even if they lose it, so long as they survive it. Then they claim to have won. They think their fervor will carry them through. They must redeem their honor, a never ending quest.

Nasser's policy led to decades of war and waste. The Arabs are not considering that, however. They have dropped previous calculations that they cannot conquer Israel so they may as well stop trying to (Barry Rubin, Middle East Forum news, 12/11).

Many Western policy makers have not realized this shift in Muslim thinking. They also don't pay attention to how much such incendiary attitudes are reflected in their own Muslim populations.

CIVIL STRIFE IN P.A.

Fatah and Hamas attack each other every week. Recently, gunmen shot at a car near a crowd of school children. Three children in the car and the driver were killed (Arutz-7, 12/11). It was a reckless disregard for bystanders, since the assassins had other opportunities. If Israeli forces had killed those children, Human Rights Watch would have accused it of a war crime. Why no indignation or publicity about Arab crimes?

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

HOW DIFFERENTLY THE JUDICIARY TREATS ARAB TERRORISTS AND JEWISH DEMONSTRATORS!
Posted by Jack Golbert, January 3, 2007.

The parole board freed the convicted traitor, Tali Fahima, on the grounds that she behaved well in prison and posed no threat to public safety. She only helped a terrorist organization murder Jews. She is not sorry for what she did and is determined to continue her "humanitarian" work.

In contrast, the two 14-year-olds who peacefully demonstrated but disobeyed a cop and refused to recognize a Godless legal system were held without bail, incommunicato and sometimes in solitary confinement until the end of proceedings because the judge solemnly found that they do constitute a threat to public safety. Their incarceration was illegal (and over the protest of the prosecuting attorney) but the judge berated the father of one of the girls because he did not recognize "the sanctity of the law."

What does "public safety" mean to this system? Clearly, it does not mean what we mean.

The story below is called "Tali Fahima released from prison" and was written by the Jerusalem Post Staff. It appeared yesterday in the The Jerusalem Post
(www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467648444&pagename= JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull).

Moshe Belogorodsky, father of one of the Jewish teenagers arrested exercising their civil rights, wrote about his daughter Chaya's experiences with the judiciary. Read it by clicking here.

Fahima, the Tel Aviv woman who befriended Jenin's Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades head Zakariya Zubeidi, was released Wednesday from prison after the Prison Services parole board cut short her sentence.

Fahima, whose case became a cause celebre throughout the country, was sentenced to three years imprisonment on charges of providing information to the enemy in order to assist him, contacting a foreign agent and violating a legal order.

Zubeidi 'salutes' Fahima, hopes to see her soon

Following her release, Fahima said she planned to continue her "humanitarian work" -- a reference to her contacts with Palestinian terror organizations, Army Radio reported.

"I will continue to fight against occupation and for peace," she said.

In reference to her past actions, she said "there is no regret in my heart."

Fahima was greeted outside the Neve Tirza prison by her lawyer, Smadar Ben-Natan, and about 100 other supporters. "I am very happy," Ben-Natan said. "I don't think she needed to sit (in prison) at all, obviously not for this long."

Fahima was released with restrictions, Prison Authority spokeswoman Orit Shtelzer said in a statement. She is "banned from leaving the country in the coming year, contacting a foreign agent or entering unauthorized territories," the statement read.

Fahima denied rumors she had an affair with Zubeydi and continued to call him a "hero." She also told Army Radio she would not renew contact with Zubeydi.

Fahima later told Channel 2 News that she had emerged from her imprisonment "a stronger person," reiterating her commitment to continue to fight against the occupation, and against what she described as the Shin Bet's (Israel Security Agency) oppressive policies against the Palestinians.

When asked whether she was worried about walking the streets of Tel Aviv, Fahima responded that everyone had the "right to express their opinions," adding sarcastically that she could always turn to security establishment if things turned nasty.

Zubeidi told reporters that he and the residents of the Jenin refugee camp were ecstatic at the news of Fahima's release, describing her as someone "who was not afraid to tell the truth about Israel and the occupation."

Wednesday marked Fahima's second appearance before the parole board. Her first request was denied on the grounds that she had acted "crassly and impudently" towards prison guards during her incarceration.

The board, headed by retired judge Nora Lidski, noted that Fahima's behavior had improved during the last three months and that she had agreed to release her after three more months in jail if she kept up her good behavior.

According to the original indictment, Fahima was charged with three other violations, including aiding the enemy in war time, a crime for which the maximum punishment is the death penalty.

She was arrested on August 8, 2004 on her way to Jenin. A year earlier, she had befriended Zubeidi. During one of her subsequent visits, the army raided Jenin in an attempt to arrest Zubeidi and other terrorist leaders.

One of the soldiers lost a classified document containing the details of the operation. Fahima was accused of translating the document to Zubeidi and his friends.

During the police investigation leading up to her trial, the state accused her of planning terrorist acts against Israeli targets.

However the indictment, even in its original form before the plea bargain agreement, did not include such a charge.

Fahima's trial began on January 11, 2005. On November 30 of the same year Ben-Natan reached a plea bargain agreement with the state prosecution according to which the state dropped three of the charges against her.

In return, Fahima agreed to plead guilty to the remaining charges and accept a jail sentence of three years, with the possibility of early parole. Fahima also declared her loyalty to Israel during a hearing at Tel Aviv District Court on December 14, 2005 and said she had not intended to harm state security.

Ben-Natan told The Jerusalem Post that on the basis of what parole board head Lidski said at the previous hearing on September 13, she had hoped her client would be released.

Ben-Natan said Fahima had behaved properly during the past three months except for "one incident in jail," which she declined to describe.

Nevertheless, she said she was worried that the state would "once again not live up to the word it gave in the plea bargain agreement" in which it allegedly promised not to stand in the way of an early release. In the first hearing, held September 13, the state opposed Fahima's parole request.

In a 2005 interview with Yediot Aharonot, Fahima called the Shin Bet security service a "terror organization." She said she spent her time in jail watching the Al-Jazeera Arab satellite channel and being "cynical" with her interrogators.

Contact Jack Golbert at golbert@actcom.co.il

To Go To Top

BELIEVE IT OR ELSE
Posted by David Ha'Ivri, January 3, 2007.

David Ha'Ivri promotes the return of the Temple Mount to the Jews. Contact him by email at haivri@gmail.com. This cartoon is archived at
www.revava.org/forum/index.php/topic,2989.msg23824.html#msg23824

To Go To Top

HAUNTED BY THE GHOSTS OF CHAMBERLAINS PAST
Posted by Nurit Greenger, January 3, 2007.

Comments: We are at WAR. There is no reason why, by now we are not kicking the living crap out of every terrorist we can find, no matter what name is applied to his particular extremist organization.

There is no reason on earth we even consider negotiating with the "leaders of nations," that have clearly sided with our enemies in this war, especially Iran that's determined to build a nuclear bomb and thinks that Israel should be, in the words of its own president, "wiped off the map."

How many times does diplomacy have to fail before the democracies of the west come to the realization that the only way to stop violent despots from threatening the world is to bomb them and their followers into dust? Stop the politically engineered wars.

If you thought Hitler was a menace, try junior Hitler with ten megatons of nuclear destructive force...

Failing to achieve victory against the forces of Islamo-fascism will, in all likelihood, lead to a nuclear holocaust on our own soil! Have you ever taken a moment to imagine the devastation of an actual nuclear strike on an American city? THINK! IMAGINE!

Free people are free because they're FIGHTERS, not because they roll over and expose their bellies every time some punk gets in their face! Where is our Churchill? We need a Churchill!

This was written by Edward L. Daley has been active in politics since 1984, the first year he was old enough to vote for the President of the United States. Currently he is a landlord and the owner of the Daley Times-Post on-line news journal
(http://www.times-post.com). He lives in Thomaston, Maine.

It is archived at
www.opinioneditorials.com:80/guestcontributors/edaley_20070103.html

It's no secret that Iran, and to a lesser degree, Syria, are responsible for supplying weapons to our enemies in Iraq, as well as encouraging would-be terrorists from their own lands to join the ranks of the blood-thirsty Islamo-fascist militias that our military and the Iraqi Army faces on a daily basis in the area known as the Sunni Triangle.

Both of these countries also directly support Hezbollah, the most well-organized terrorist group in the world, and next to Al-Qaeda, the most deadly. The United States and Israel know full well the threat posed by this extremist faction and their patron states, yet year after year passes with no substantial military action being taken against them. Why?

It's all well and good that we are expending every available resource to destroy Al-Qaeda and its confederates worldwide, but for some inexplicable reason the terrorist organization which was responsible for more American deaths prior to 9/11 than any other in history is largely ignored by the Bush Administration. Israel as well seems to have concluded that taking the fight to these parasites isn't worth the trouble, and every time I think about what's going on in Lebanon these days, my stomach begins composing an overture to the next 'Star Wars' sequel.

Hezbollah is treated as if it were little more than a minor nuisance by the only two countries on earth that have ever exhibited any real, long-term commitment to advancing the cause of liberty in the Middle East, and I can't for the life of me understand the mindset of the people charged with leading the free world in this global conflict we commonly refer to as the "War On Terrorism".

It's no surprise to me that the many thousands of virulent anti-Semites who inhabit every major global news outlet, left-wing government, and internationalist organization are more than happy to side with these radical Islamo-fascists as they make war against the state of Israel. Dirtbags like Kofi Annan and Vladimir Putin will support anyone who hates Jews, regardless of the negative, long-term affects of their actions upon everyone else. But why would George W. Bush and Ehud Olmert behave as if Hezbollah didn't deserve to be wiped off the face of the planet, and their benefactors in Iran and Syria right along with them?

While we were fighting against Japan and Germany in World War II, we didn't just turn a blind eye to Italy! Yes, the Japanese were our main target at first, and as soon as we got our act together, we went after the leader of the pack, the Nazis, but at no time did we ever say to ourselves that Mussolini's fascist army didn't have a major ass-whooping coming to it.

This is war, damnit! Why aren't we kicking the living crap out of every terrorist we can find, no matter what name is applied to his particular extremist organization? And why the hell are we even considering negotiating with the leaders of nations which have clearly sided with our enemies in this war, especially one that's determined to build a nuclear bomb and thinks that Israel should be, in the words of its own president, "wiped off the map"?

Anyone who thinks that Iran's leaders can be bargained with, or that threatening them with some useless U.N. resolution is going to dissuade them from eventually turning Jerusalem into a parking lot, is crazier than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. How many times does diplomacy have to fail before the democracies of the west come to the realization that the only way to stop violent despots from threatening the world is to bomb them and their followers into dust?

The last time the United States took the approach to warfare that we're taking today, we won every major battle we fought... right up until the day we lost the war. That was over 30 years ago, and an entire generation of our best and bravest has yet to recover fully from that politically-engineered defeat.

The main difference between the current war and Vietnam is that losing this time around won't just humiliate us and leave hundreds of thousands of innocent foreigners to be slaughtered at the hands of our enemies. No, failing to achieve victory against the forces of Islamo-fascism will, in all likelihood, lead to a nuclear holocaust on our own soil!

If you thought Hitler was a menace, try Hitler with ten megatons of nuclear destructive force at his disposal, and fifty million followers so fanatical that they would willingly give their lives to ensure the utter annihilation of every Jew and Christian on earth.

Do you think I'm just trying to scare you with all this doomsday scenario stuff? If you do then think again! I haven't even attempted to describe the devastation of an actual nuclear strike on an American city, nor is it my desire to do so at this time. Suffice it to say that the things you've imagined in your worst nightmares don't begin to equal the horrors of such a reality.

Kim Jong Il managed to get his grubby little hands on a nuclear weapon by promising that he'd play nice with the rest of the world if only President Clinton would stop insisting he treat his own people like human beings. Slick Willy left himself wide open to a hell of a sucker-punch back in the '90s, and now there's one more tin-pot dictator in the world with the ability to kill more people in a single day than Pol Pot did in his entire murderous career.

Still, as lunatic regimes go, the one led by Chairman Kim is at least manageable. China's leaders, even though they are no allies of ours, do indeed recognize that a nuclear North Korea threatens the stability of the very region they inhabit, and will do what is necessary to keep its barking-mad leader from going postal on South Korea, Japan, or any other country in the neighborhood. Little Kim isn't about to screw with the ChiComs, regardless of his posturing, and at least for the time being, the threat of his arsenal remains relatively minimal.

However, the same cannot be said of the current Iranian government. Like Hitler's dreaded Third Reich, this malignant cabal is composed of stark-staring maniacs who apparently fear no one. Moreover, their objectives are founded in an ideology which has existed since "the prophet" Muhammad himself walked the earth some 1,500 years ago, and belief systems that old tend to die hard.

Tell me, does this seem to you like the best time in history for the American people to pack it in? Should the Israelis retreat within the ever-shrinking borders of their own country, and pray that those who've conspired against them from the day their nation was established will just decide to stop attacking them for no apparent reason?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but free people are obliged to fight for liberty every day of their lives, no matter what the odds, no matter what the cost, no matter what some defeatist coward may have to say about it. Free people are free because they're FIGHTERS, not because they roll over and expose their bellies every time some punk gets in their face!

Sir Winston Churchill once said:

"You ask, What is our policy? I will say; it is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us: to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, What is our aim? I can answer with one word: Victory... victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival."

He made that statement over 60 years ago in reference to the global struggle against Nazism, one of the greatest threats to humanity in the annals of recorded history, and second only to Communism in terms of the number of innocent people exterminated in its name during the 20th century.

Of course, Churchill recognized the threat of Hitler's regime well before the start of World War II, and spoke out against the irrational view of his fellow countrymen that the Germans could be pacified. His warnings fell on deaf ears, however, and as history now shows, a catastrophe of unparalleled proportions soon followed. The appeasers within the British government and elsewhere around the word waited too long to try and stop Hitler's war machine, and their naiveté led directly to the slaughter of tens of millions of people.

Pursuing peace with a group of fanatics whose stated intentions from the beginning were to eliminate the Jews and conquer the world (sound familiar?) proved to be so profoundly idiotic that applying the term 'brain dead' to the people who tried it, would only be acceptable today if doing so wasn't such an insult to the clinically deceased. At least the dead have a good reason for not fighting evil when its standing right in front of them. What was the Allies' excuse for their inaction prior to the Nazi invasion of Poland?

And what is our generation's excuse for not striking at the heart of Islamo-fascism before it is able to unleash the power of an atomic weapon upon infidels like you, and your parents, and your children? The politicians who currently run the democracies of the world act like they have no recollection of the events of the 20th century, and seem more than willing to repeat the horrendous mistakes of the not-too-distant past.

They claim -- just as their predecessors did in the 1930s -- that they are merely seeking a peaceful resolution to the conflict at hand, but if you ask me, they have been stricken with rigor mortis of the spirit, and it is up to those of us who are not yet ready for the boneyard to take decisive action against the eternal forces of darkness while time is still on our side.

Tick -- tick -- tick...

Contact Nurit Greenger at 4nuritg@ca.rr.com

To Go To Top

STORM TRACK INTIMTION: THE LITIGATION JIHAD
Posted by Michael Travis, January 3, 2007.

This comes from The Gathering Storm blog --
http://the-gathering-storm.blogspot.com

The bag of non-violent tactics used by the jihadists is deep indeed. Over the last few decades they have perfected a series of effective Jihads against the non-Muslim world while it slumbered in its political correct dream world. There are many Jihads the Islamists use and they all support their ultimate goal -- an Islamic world ruled by Shari Law. Here they are:

* Education Jihad
* Cultural Jihad
* Demographic Jihad,
* Economic jihad
* Institutional Jihad
* Media jihad
* Financial jihad
* Criminal jihad
* Thuggery Jihad.

-- and their most effective tool of intimidation -- the Litigation Jihad.

The litigation jihad has been a helpful tool in checking a proper response of the non-Muslim and advancing the objectives of subjugating the world to the will of Islam. It is an insidious tool because the Islamists have learned well its effectiveness by watching the non-Muslim world more and more fold under their legal intimidation as a result of our pacifism, self-hatred and complacency. Here are some examples.

* Dr. Paul Williams is being sued by McMaster University for investigating terrorist activity at McMaster, in an attempt to stop Dr. Williams' investigation.

* Atlas Shrugs reports "Rachel Ehrenfeld is one of the daring truth tellers that the Islamists want to shut up and shut down. She is the preeminent scholar on the tracking of Islamic terror funding. Like CAIR, the Saudis use the legal system to bankrupt and harass scholars, journalists etc. Steve Emerson is being sued as well (along with Charles Jacobs of the David Project) by the Islamic Society of Boston here and here"

But this one cuts the cake.

Danny Nalliah and Daniel Scott are pastors who live in Australia. They are now being drug through the Australian court system due to charges brought against them by the Islamic Council of Victoria. The charges? Vilification of Muslims under Australia's Victorian Religious and Racial Tolerance Act of 2002.

So what did these hate mongers do?

Danny and Daniel were hosting a seminar about the similarities between Christianity and Islam when they began reading passages from the Koran to aid in their speech. Danny and Daniel, the evil Islam-haters, were found to have only made two errors in their speech.

1. He gave the wrong birthrate for Muslims in Australia. 2. He failed to quote a verse that showed Allah was merciful.

This is costing these men $150,000 in court fees!

But even if we win, the Islamists extract their pound of flesh. Debbie Schlussel sites one example.

Remember the frivolous lawsuit against America, filed just a month ago by the Islamofascist American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)? The group tried to soak U.S. taxpayers in court on behalf of Hezbollah supporting "Americans" in Lebanon ... after they already soaked U.S. taxpayers to evacuate those Hezbollah-loving "Americans" from Lebanon. Yesterday, the absurd lawsuit was dropped, to--surprise! surprise!--hardly a peep compared to the media fanfare surrounding the filing of this prime example of lawsuit abuse.

But regardless of the withdrawal of this suit, U.S. taxpayers have been soaked ad absurdum over the whole Lebanon thing, started by terrorist group Hezbollah.

U.S. taxpayers paid to fly these terror-sympathizers into the U.S.--many for the first time ever to set foot on our shores. And probably for the last time to ever be seen again--likely to disappear into the great American abyss free of Immigration and Customs Enforcement hassles. Sources from the Federal Air Marshals Service also inform DebbieSchlussel.com that they had at least 12 Federal Air Marshals on each flight going out of Cyprus--out of fear by the U.S. Government that these ungrateful Hezbo supporters would try to hijack the planes on the way here. For all of that, we got sued by the ADC and a ACLU NSA plaintiff.

Litigation jihad is turning our justice system on its head in service to multiculturalism and political correctness. To quote Robert Spencer:

"The free world is under assault everywhere from the forces of jihad, working from the teachings of the Qur'an and Sunnah, and notably the words and deeds of Muhammad. Yet in America and the West, taking note of these rather obvious facts only brings one opprobrium, if the chattering classes deign to take notice at all: one is compelled in the mainstream of public discourse to deny the obvious. Everyone is busy tossing away common sense, reason, and basic powers of observation."

Litigation jihad is one weapon -- and an effective weapon -- in neutralizing our cultural defense mechanism which needs to be finely honed to defeat the Islamists and their plan for world domination.

You can sign up for a free Weekly Storm Report at http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101468709270 and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

To Go To Top

IT'S NOT ABOUT ISRAEL, STUPID
Posted by Naomi Ragen, January 3, 2007.

This was written by David A. Harris, who is executive director of the American Jewish Committee. It appeared December 30, 2006 in the Jerusalem Post.

A number of voices in the international community have recently identified the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as the root cause of many of the Middle East's problems. British Prime Minister Tony Blair and outgoing UN Secretary General Kofi Annan have been among the most prominent of these voices.

In his article "A battle for global values," (Foreign Affairs, January/February 2007), Tony Blair reiterates what he has expressed in previous public statements: "How can we bring peace to the Middle East unless we resolve the question of Israel and Palestine?" Achieving peace, he continues, "would not only silence reactionary Islam's most effective rallying call but fatally undermine its basic ideology."

Kofi Annan, addressing the UN Security Council on December 12, said,

"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not just one regional conflict amongst many. No other conflict carries such a powerful symbolic and emotional charge even for people far away."

True, genuine peace between Israel and the Palestinians would remove one of the long-standing conflicts in the Middle East. Moreover, to state the painfully obvious, peace would serve the best interests of those involved.

But to suggest, as Prime Minister Blair in particular does, that such a settlement is a necessary precondition for peace in the Middle East and would take the wind out of radical Islam's sails is unsupported by the facts.

Let's assume for a moment that Israel did not exist. Would that have changed the basic story line of the bulk of recent events in the Middle East?

Would Iraq and Iran have chosen not to pursue an eight-year war that cost more than a million fatalities? Would Iraq have decided not to invade Kuwait in 1990? Would it have rethought its use of chemical weapons against both its own Kurdish population and Iran?

Would Syria have refrained from slaughtering over 10,000 of its own citizens in Hama in 1982? Would it have relinquished its hold on Lebanon, as demanded by multiple Security Council resolutions?

Would Saudi Arabia have stopped exporting its Wahhabi model of Islam, with its narrow, doctrinaire view of the world and rejection of non-Muslims as so-called infidels, across the globe? Would al-Qaida not have attacked the US in 2001, when, it should be remembered, the Israeli-Palestinian issue was never even mentioned among Osama bin Laden's main "grievances"?

Would the danger posed by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Jordan magically disappear absent the Israel factor? Would Iran today abandon its hegemonic ambitions in the region? Would the Shi'ite-Sunni split, with its profound political and strategic ramifications, evaporate into thin air? Would the Sudanese government stop its collusion with the Arab Janjaweed militias to end the massive murder and displacement in Darfur?

Would the desperate poverty and widespread illiteracy that dampen hope and create a fertile recruiting ground for radical Islamic movements suddenly be alleviated? Would Saudi women instantaneously have the right to drive, would non-Muslims finally enjoy equal rights in all those Arab countries where Islam is the official religion, and would the Baha'i no longer experience persecution at the hands of the Iranian government?

In reality, the destabilizing factors in the Middle East run far deeper than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Strikingly, while most Western political leaders mince their words, the courageous Arab authors of the annual Arab Human Development Report have not. They have spoken of three overarching explanatory factors for the region's unsatisfactory condition: the knowledge deficit, the gender deficit and the freedom deficit.

Unless these three areas are addressed in a sustained manner, the Middle East, which ought to be one of the world's most dynamic regions, is likely to continue suffering from instability, violence and fundamentalism, irrespective of what happens on the Israeli-Palestinian front.

Consider some of the important findings in the Arab Human Development Report and related studies:

. The total number of books translated into Arabic in the last 1,000 years is fewer than those translated in Spain in one year.

. Greece, with a population of fewer than 11 million, translates five times as many books from abroad into Greek annually as the 22 Arab countries combined, with a total population of more than 300 million, translate into Arabic.

. According to a 2002 Council on Foreign Relations report, "In the 1950s, per-capita income in Egypt was similar to South Korea, whereas Egypt's per-capita income today is less than 20 percent of South Korea's. Saudi Arabia had a higher gross domestic product than Taiwan in the 1950s; today it is about 50 percent of Taiwan's."

As Dr. A.B. Zahlan, a Palestinian physicist has noted, "a regressive political culture is at the root of the Arab world's failure to fund scientific research or to sustain a vibrant, innovative community of scientists." He further asserted that "Egypt, in 1950, had more engineers than all of China." That is hardly the case today.

According to the 2005 UN Human Development Report, only two Egyptians per million people were granted patents (and for Syria the figure was zero), compared to 30 in Greece and 35 in Israel.

In the 2005 UN report the adult literacy rate for women aged 15 and older was 43.6 percent in Egypt and 74 percent in Syria, while for the world's top 20 countries it was nearly 100 percent.

And finally, according to the current Freedom House rankings, the only country in the Middle East that is listed as "free" is Israel. Every Arab country is at best "partly free" or, worse, "not free."

The sad truth is that it is precisely political oppression, intellectual suffocation and gender discrimination that explain, more than other factors, the chronic difficulties of the Middle East. To be sure, there exist no overnight or over-the-counter remedies for these maladies that would allow the region to unleash its vast potential, but they are at the heart of the problem. It would be illusory to think otherwise.

Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and journalist who lives in Jerusalem. She can be contacted at www.naomiragen.com, where you can subscribe to her newsletter.

To Go To Top

HOW TO FIGHT IRAN'S SECRET PLAN FOR ENDLESS WAR IN IRAQ UNTIL THE USA FOLDS
Posted by David Meir-Levi, January 3, 2007.

Dear Mr. President,

As I have often asserted, the current war in Iraq now is NOT a civil war, nor was it ever an "insurgency".

As the NY Sun article below indicates, it is a multi-vector war against the USA and against the possibility of a democratic Iraq emerging from the ashes of Gulf War 2.

One vector (the one discussed at length in the article) is the Iranian support for Sunni and Shi'i (but not Ba'athist) Iraqi violence against each other and against the USA. No matter who wins, Iran wins as long as the USA loses and Iraq becomes a Muslim theocratic shi'ite state. Since the Shi'ites are the biggest group, goading them to attacks against the Sunni, by having the Sunni attack them, ensures an ultimate Shi'ite victory. Once the Shi'ites are victorious, Iran and Shi'ite Iraq can turn its attention to el-Qaeda and the Kurds. Once those objectives are achieved, Iran will have hegemony in the Gulf and control of most of the world's oil, and WMDs. Then it can turn its attention to the Kafir west.

Iran uses the support from syria to feed terrorists in to the action in Iraq, because Syria has c. 63 terror training camps and nearly 70,000 terrorist wannabbees in training.

Another vector is the el-Qaedda support for Sunni anti-Shi'ite and anti-USA and anti-Ba'aths violence. el-Qaeda wins when az-Zawahiri becomes Caliph after the USA leaves and his forces finish off whoever is left standing. His next war may be with Iran. Both Iran and az-Zawahiri know that, and are prepared to stand off against one another once the USA has been defeated.

Another vector is the Saudi-Sunni alliance which supports the pro-Saddam Ba'athists and seeks to re-enstate Sunni control. The Saudis know they have no chance against Iran, so they oppose Shi'ite hegemony n the gulf by using Iraq as a buffer and a launching pad for the war against Iran, which the saudis will fund, once the USA has left.
As Tom Friedman once said, Iraq will become Lebanon on steroids once the USA leaves, unless we stay the course (albeit change the course significantly because what you and your advisors have done until now has been a colosal failure) and leave Iraq only when it has a functioning government that can control, and even better -- defeat, these anti-democracy and anti-west and anti-usa vector forces.

So what is to be done?

Well, for starters:

a.) carpet bomb the terrorist training camps in Syria. In case you are wondering, our ally the Mosad knows where they are. Syria is already an enemy at war with the USA, per your doctrine of 9/12/01. Besides killing c. half the terrorists there (a good thing to do for the future of the world), such an attack will send a powerful message to terrorists and terrorist-supporting countries everywhere. Pakistan may start wondering about the wisdom of providing the Taliban with a home base in Waziristan. Young Iranians who are opposed to their Mullocracy may start thinking about the timeliness of a coup.

b.) invade Syria from the east, across the Iraqi border, and destory the Syrian military emplacements on the Iraqi border, and the other non-military bases there, that feed terrorists in to Iraq on a regular basis. Those terrorists have killed thousands of our troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis. Syria is de facto and de iure at war with the USA. Syria is an ally of Iran which declared war on the USA on November 11, 1979 and has supported terrorism against USA targets regularly since then.

Putting Syria out of commission as a functioning terrorist state, by means of "a" and "b", will:

* put a big dent in the Iranian-Syrian vectors of anti-USA terrorism in Iraq
* put a big dent in Iran's plans for nuclear hegemony in the Gulf,
* eliminate any possibility of Iran's using Lebanon as a launching pad for nuclear threats against Europe,
* reduce the likelihood of a Hezbollah take-over in Lebanon,
* and send young Bashir rushing headlong in to urgent peace talks with Israel.
* It will also save many American and Iraqi lives.

c.) create a join military program with Egypt (better do it now, before President Mubarak dies, because once he is gone, there is a good chance that the Muslim Brotherhood will take over and turn Egypt in to an anti-West terror state as bad as Iran, or worse). With that program, you get Egypt's permission to carpet bomb the el-Qaeda bases in the Sinai.

Once you put el-Qaeda out of commission in Sinai, you set back az-Zawahiri's plans for his Caliphate in Baghdad by at least ten years. That gives the West (aka the USA) time to finish the job of hunting down and killing the rest of el-Qaeda's leadership.....a sine qua non for any hope of an end to the terrorist threats we face world-wide.

d.) commit enough troops to the war in Iraq so that the border with Syria can be crushed into quiescence and then sealed tight. The do the same for the Iranian border. That, plus 'a' through 'c' will give the Iranians the message that our warships in the Arabian Gulf will attack if Iran attacks us in Iraq. Whether the Iranians will heed that message is not knowable....but they will get the message.

In the fake world of the UN and the Democratic Party, you will be vilified and condemned and decried as a war-monger and a demented assailant against Islam....but in the real world, the Egyptian government, the Syrian rank-and-file, most of Lebanon, almost all of Iraq, and the under-30 crowd in Iran will bless you (albeit probably in secret).

[ps: you should also give Israel the green light to activate its covert plan to destroy some of the Iranian WMD emplacements. You won't even need to take any heat for that...you can keep it secret. The Israelis won't tell. Once a few reactors are blown up before they go hot, Iran's WMD plans will be set back about 5 -- 10 years....plenty of time for regime change as more young Iranians grow to voting age. Also, the damoclean sword of Iranian WMD hegemony over the gulf, as well as the WMD arms race that this sword engenders among gulf Arab states, will both be ended.]

Unsure? Sounds too outre? Well, here are some things to remember when pondering my suggestions:

1. appeasement and diplomacy with Hitler worked for c. 6 months. then he invaded Poland precisely because he felt he could get away with it (due to the craven nature of the previous UK and French diplomacy). That started WW 2. Soon all of Europe was in flames. And five years later, somewhere between 40,000,000 and 70,000,000 people were dead.

What would have happend had the Allied forces in Europe faced Hitler with a united front and a military response to his first stages of aggression? How many lives, how many cities, how many entire countries, entire peoples, would have been saved from the charnal-house destruction of WW 2?

2. Israel's air strike against Saddam Hussein's Iraqi nuclear reactor in Baghdad, Osiraq, on June 4, 1981, was phenomenally successful. It set back Saddam's plans for nuclear power by at least ten years. And it brought down upon Israel world-wide calumny and condemnation. But, have you seen the photo on the wall of the office of the Israeli air force commander who ordered the strike? It is an American satelite photo of the blown up Iraqi reactor....with the signature: "many thanks,. Ron!". Covertly, many nations around the world sent their thanks to Menahem Begin for doing what they could not figure out how to do....but all knew needed to be done.

What would your father have needed to face in gulf war 1 if Saddam had been able to deploy nuclear weapons?

3.) As these two examples show, there are times when peace is NOT the way. There are times when war IS the answer. There are times when a llimited but effective military action now will save untold millions of lives and horrific destruction later.

There are times when global circumstances call upon the world's leaders to employ vision and wisdom and foresight; and to make unpopular decisions knowing that they are unpopular, but knowing also that they are the right decisions for the current threats that we face.

All too often, in the past, world leaders have failed in these crucibles of crisis. But what we must learn from those failures is that appeasement merely emboldens the aggressor.

To expand a bit upon the widsom of Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus (3rd c. AD, Rome) "Vis pacem, para bellam" ("want peace? [then] prepare for war")....If you want peace in the future, you need to conduct a limited but effective war now. Otherwise, our enemies will grow in strength, resolve, territory and technology....and we will be faced soon with a much larger and more lethal war....and perhaps a nuclear one as well.

This article was written by Eli Lake. It is called "Iran's Secret Plan For Mayhem" and it appeared in the N.Y. Sun
(www.nysun.com/article/46032?access=858120).

WASHINGTON -- Iran is supporting both Sunni and Shiite terrorists in the Iraqi civil war, according to secret Iranian documents captured by Americans in Iraq.

The news that American forces had captured Iranians in Iraq was widely reported last month, but less well known is that the Iranians were carrying documents that offered Americans insight into Iranian activities in Iraq.

An American intelligence official said the new material, which has been authenticated within the intelligence community, confirms "that Iran is working closely with both the Shiite militias and Sunni Jihadist groups." The source was careful to stress that the Iranian plans do not extend to cooperation with Baathist groups fighting the government in Baghdad, and said the documents rather show how the Quds Force -- the arm of Iran's revolutionary guard that supports Shiite Hezbollah, Sunni Hamas, and Shiite death squads -- is working with individuals affiliated with Al Qaeda in Iraq and Ansar al-Sunna.

Another American official who has seen the summaries of the reporting affiliated with the arrests said it comprised a "smoking gun." "We found plans for attacks, phone numbers affiliated with Sunni bad guys, a lot of things that filled in the blanks on what these guys are up to," the official said.

One of the documents captured in the raids, according to two American officials and one Iraqi official, is an assessment of the Iraq civil war and new strategy from the Quds Force. According to the Iraqi source, that assessment is the equivalent of " Iran's Iraq Study Group," a reference to the bipartisan American commission that released war strategy recommendations after the November 7 elections. The document concludes, according to these sources, that Iraq's Sunni neighbors will step up their efforts to aid insurgent groups and that it is imperative for Iran to redouble efforts to retain influence with them, as well as with Shiite militias. Rough translations of the Iranian assessment and strategy, as well as a summary of the intelligence haul, have been widely distributed throughout the policy community and are likely to influence the Iraq speech President Bush is expected to deliver in the coming days regarding the way forward for the war, according to two Bush administration officials.

The news that Iran's elite Quds Force would be in contact, and clandestinely cooperating, with Sunni Jihadists who attacked the Golden Mosque in Samarra (one of the holiest shrines in Shiism) on February 22, could shake the alliance Iraq's ruling Shiites have forged in recent years with Tehran. Many Iraq analysts believe the bombing vaulted Iraq into the current stage of its civil war.

The top Quds Force commander -- known as Chizari, according to a December 30 story in the Washington Post -- was captured inside a compound belonging to Abdul Aziz Hakim, the Shiite leader President Bush last month pressed to help forge a new ruling coalition that excludes a firebrand Shiite cleric, Moqtada al-Sadr.

According to one Iraqi official, the two Quds commanders were in Iraq at the behest of the Iraqi government, which had requested more senior Iranian points of contact when the government complained about Shiite death squad activity. The negotiations were part of an Iraqi effort to establish new rules of the road between Baghdad and Tehran. This arrangement was ironed out by Iraq's president, Jalal Talabani, when he was in Tehran at the end of November.

While Iran has openly supported Iraqi Shiite militias involved in attacks on American soldiers, the Quds Force connection to Sunni insurgents has been murkier.

In 2003, coalition forces captured a playbook outlining Iranian intentions to support insurgents of both stripes, but its authenticity was disputed.

American intelligence reports have suggested that export/import operations run by Sunni terrorists in Fallujah in 2004 received goods from the revolutionary guard.

"We have seen bits and piece of things before, but it was highly compartmentalized suggesting the Iranian link to Sunni groups," a military official said.

A former Iran analyst for the Pentagon who also worked as an adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority, Michael Rubin, said yesterday: "There has been lots of information suggesting that Iran has not limited its outreach just to the Shiites, but this has been disputed."

He added, "When documents like this are found, usually intelligence officials may confirm their authenticity but argue they prove nothing because they do not reflect a decision to operationalize things."

A former State Department senior analyst on Iraq and Iran who left government service in 2005, Wayne White, said he did not think it was likely the Quds Force was supporting Sunni terrorists who were targeting Shiite political leaders and civilians, but stressed he did not know.

"I have no doubt whatsoever that al-Quds forces are on the ground and active in Iraq," he said. "That's about it. I saw evidence that Moqtada al Sadr was in contact with Sunni Arab insurgents in western Iraq, but I never saw evidence of Iran in that loop."

Mr. White added, "One problem that we all have is that people consistently conduct analysis assuming that the actor is going to act predictably or rationally based on their overall mindset or ideology. Sometimes people don't.

"One example of a mindset that may hinder analysis of Iranian involvement is the belief that Iran would never have any dealings with militant Sunni Arabs. But they allowed hundreds of Al Qaeda operatives to escape from Afghanistan across their territory in 2002," he said.

David Meir-Levi is an American-born Israeli, currently living in Palo Alto. His expertise is in Near Eastern studies and the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He is Director of Peace and Education at Israel Peace Initiative (www.ipi-usa.org). Contact him at david_meirlevi@hotmail.com

To Go To Top

BOYCOTT BEN GURION UNIVERSITY
Posted by Bryna Berch, January 3, 2007.

Ben Gurion University is rabidly protective of its radicalized anti-Israel faculty. Before you get all fuzzy and tell me that's a good thing because they are protecting free speech, just remember how selective they are -- they don't much protect free-speech coming from faculty members who are patriotic and care about protecting Israel. See, for example, the article by Arieh Zaritsky called "Academic Freedom And Freedom Of Speech In Israel's Universities During The Oslo Decade: 1993-2003". Click here to read it. Professor Zaritsky wrote this in 2003, and despite how openly the Arabs continue to proclaim they are out to destroy Israel, BGU continues to preach treason and teach hate of Israel.

This is an Letter to the Editor from the Jewish Voice and Opinion of Englewood, New Jersey. It was written by Ben Weinstein, who now lives in Herzliya, Israel

As a recent immigrant to Israel from Northern NJ, I just finished reading with uncontrollable disgust and revulsion your December feature on the disgraceful and treasonous behavior of Neve Gordon ["Accusations of Slander, Plagiarism, and Holocaust Revisionism, Beyond Chutzpah: A Tale of Steve, Neve, Alan, and Norman," Dec 2006]. But my outrage was less directed at him than at the University that endorses and defends his antisemitic and anti-democratic behavior.

The fact of the matter is Ben Gurion University (BGU) is increasingly earning its nickname as the "Israeli University of Treason" and the "Bir Zeit of the Negev." While all Israeli universities have some anti-Israel and antisemitic lunatics on their faculties, all the other schools openly repudiate theirs!

The heads of the University of Haifa have long been quite candid about the disgust they feel towards Ilan Pappe and have repeatedly repudiated him. They have even attempted to get him dismissed (alas, unsuccessfully).

The other Israeli universities have also distanced themselves from their treasonous extremists and have publicly repudiated them. BGU is the only Israeli school that has consistently backed and endorsed the rabid anti-Israel extremism of its seditious faculty members, first and foremost Neve Gordon himself (whose "academic career" consists of little beyond turning out anti-Israel hate propaganda and running his classroom as an anti-Zionist indoctrination camp). The school is also home to Lev Grinberg, Oren Yiftachel, and dozens of others.

That such people are employed at a university named after the great David Ben Gurion is disgraceful enough, but it also dramatically illustrates the fact that in most of the social sciences and humanities departments at BGU, academic standards have simply been trashed and people are being hired and promoted entirely on the basis of their fashionable anti-Israel politics and ability to turn out anti-Israel hate propaganda.

In other words, BGU today is less interested in being a serious research institution than it is in being at the forefront of the movement to see Israel destroyed!

Those of us who care about Israel must draw the logical conclusion. We want our donations to Israel to be used to build up the Jewish state, not tear it down. And that is why not a single dime should be contributed to BGU as long as Neve Gordon and his seditious cronies are employed there.

Parents of college-age students should be urged to send their children elsewhere to study. Representatives of BGU coming to our communities should be treated as persona non grata.

To Go To Top

BAKER COMMISSION ABSURD; PERVERSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS; HAMAS' OFFER TO ISRAEL
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 3, 2007.

OVERFLIGHTS IN LEBANON

Carrying its objection to Israeli reconnaissance flights over Lebanon further, the French UNIFIL expedition is bringing in French UAVs to perform the reconnaissance. UNIFIL asserts that that precludes Israel's need to fly over. It happens that this would be a demonstration of French UAVs, which compete in the market with Israeli UAVs.

Israeli officers tried to explain to the French why the overflights are needed, in any case. The French didn't agree (IMRA, 12/10).

The explanation was omitted from the news brief, which just stated that Israel needs to monitor smuggling of arms to Hizbullah. Now UNIFIL will monitor that, too. What does it matter, if neither party uses the information to stop the smuggling?

I think Israel needs the information for its military planners and commanders in the imminent renewal of war by Hizbullah, thanks to its rearming that UNIFIL was supposed to stop. It also would show that UNIFIL did not do the job proposed as justifying a ceasefire. After the ceasefire started, and Israeli troops had withdrawn, UNIFIL defined its job so it could not accomplish much. Israel had agreed to it blindly. Incidentally, this vindicates PM Begin who was maligned for wanting to spell out agreements in advance.

BAKER COMMISSION THE WRONG APPROACH

Congress failed to oversee the war, as is its responsibility. The Baker group thought that it would fill the gap and its high-level officials would come up with solutions without spending time in the field, as if the government did not know the answers.

The problem with the group is not, as I had thought, lack of diversity of view. It had diverse membership but was set up to produce a consensus and avoid controversy. Instead of quietly advising the President, as most committees do, it engaged in public relations. (That had to antagonize him unless he found in it a face-saving excuse to get out of the war.)

The government knows much of what to do. But it moves too slowly. That's a major problem with the war. As the panel recommends, the Army already is embedding trainers in Iraqi forces, but too few.

The group made many silly and vague recommendations. Fatuous: Iran should respect Iraq's border, and the US should use diplomacy with Iran. Who would make Iran respect the border? Does the panel really think the problem from those fanatics is that our diplomats didn't share tea with them? The US, suggested the panel, should use incentives and disincentives with Iran. Which ones? It did not specify. But it presumed that its suggestion were easy to implement. It isn't.

Another fatuous recommendation was that Israel negotiate directly with the P.A., but only with those in it who accept Israel's legitimacy. None such are in power. Still another, is that Syria should cooperate in the Hariri assassination investigation and should persuade Hamas to recognize Israel. Just a wish list (IMRA, 12/9 from Elliot Cohen, Wall St. J.). No better chance for that than for a snowball in Hell.

THE PERVERSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS

"Amnesty International is a superpower with an annual budget of almost $200 million, used to promote radical political agendas and photo-ops for its leaders." "...As a result, little remains of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in the shadow of the Holocaust. Officials of Amnesty and other non-governmental organizations focus their attacks on democracies attempting to defend against terror, with far fewer resources to oppose totalitarian and genocidal regimes such as Sudan and Iran."

"The silence of Khan and other officials regarding the human rights of the Israeli soldiers kidnapped by Palestinians and by Hizbullah, and the human rights of Ron Arad, is damning."

"THE HYPOCRISY and political bias of these NGOs, in collaboration with the United Nations Human Rights Council, is particularly blatant in the case of Israel. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch (HRW), Christian Aid (UK), and pro-Palestinian partners actively implement the 2001 Durban agenda using the rhetoric of human rights to demonize Israel. Adopting the version of history starting with "Israeli occupation," these groups advance an ideology that presents Arabs as victims and Israelis as aggressors."

"The war between Hizbullah and Israel produced another wave in which defensive actions were automatically condemned as 'war crimes,' 'collective punishment' or violations of international law. Amnesty and HRW together issued dozens of press releases, almost all of which focused on allegations against Israel."

"Without providing criteria, Amnesty statements declared that the Israeli strikes in Beirut were 'grossly disproportionate,' while acknowledging this was where 'Hizbullah had its headquarters,' directing the firing of thousands of rockets against Israel." That is self-contradictory."

"In addition, the European Union and its member states fund many groups that also use the language of human rights to promote conflict and demonization of Israel. The grandly named Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN) issued a torrent of political statements and one-sided condemnations during the Lebanon War. Other EU-supported 'human rights' groups campaign against Israel's security barrier, with terms such as 'apartheid wal' and call for boycotts, sanctions and other measures that are part of the political war.

"Some of these NGOs refer to 'resistance' and 'martyrdom' operations against 'Israel Occupation Forces,' meaning terror attacks and suicide bombers that have killed hundreds of Israeli civilians." (That's Islamist language.)

"In this way, European governments, including Switzerland and Norway, are contributing to the destruction of human rights based on universal principles, and undermining peace efforts they claim to promote." (IMRA, 12/10 from NGO Monitor.)

Earlier articles here exposed how the organizations miss evidence or make accusations without evidence. They have lent themselves as a propaganda arm of the Islamists. It seems to be part of the radical notion of "progressives" picking on the Jewish state as if that makes them righteous instead of evil. What else can one conclude when they persist in the exposed methods of frame-up?

SWEDEN, EX-DEMOCRACY

Some countries live off reputation. One such country, Sweden, is run by a political, media, and intellectual establishment. The main press organizations are either owned or subsidized by the government. The establishment controls the flow of news, keeping the people, nominally in charge, misinformed. The flow promotes welfare state, anti-Zionist, anti-American, and pro-Islam propaganda. For example, the biggest newspaper claimed that the terrorists who attacked the US on 9/11 were no enemies of Sweden but only of US imperialism, for "the US is the greatest mass-murderer of our time." The sentiment is echoed in the countries' schools. (Red China murdered at least 30 million people, the Muslims killed more in Sudan than the US did in its Mideast wars. The 9/11 attackers were imperialist about their Islamist ideology.)

The US is depicted as crime -- ridden. Sweden, however, has twice the US murder rate. Muslims form at least 10% of the population, are disproportionately unemployed, and are prone to violence. Most Swedes don't like these social changes and the policies that promote them. But the media rarely reports crime, violence, and complaints about it. Again, most Swedes doubt Islam is compatible with Western society, but the establishment doesn't discuss this, either.

Stockholm's survey of a largely Muslim suburb's 9th grade boys found admission of 17%, 31%, and 24%, respectively, to have forced sex upon someone, injured someone enough to require medical care, and burglarized houses or cars. The survey was ignored by the media. What the TV showed, instead, was Michael Moore's fallacious "Bowling for Columbine," an account of the Rosenberg spies described as executed not for their crime but for Communist sympathies (but no other Communists were executed), and "Why We Fight," which attributed recent US wars to contractors' greed.

Since 9/11, American books translated into Swedish included several each by Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, communist historian Eric Hobsbawm, and one each by an anti-American journalist, Holocaust denier Norman Finklestein, etc.. From the full list, only one author was not a leftist.

An independent TV channel presented arguments about the (Iraq?) war pro and con. For including the affirmative, the government charged it with violating press-balance guidelines, but the press and government is not balanced, the program was.

One major political party articulates the people's concern about immigration and integration policies. The government closed its web site for publishing a cartoon of Muhammad. Some parties' youth movements have demonstrated successfully to fire members of that dissident party. One was a diplomat who criticized immigration policy. The ruling parties' thugs closed down meetings of the dissident party and beat up party leaders. That party would do better in elections, during which it won no seats, if poll watchers could not see what Swedes check on their paper ballots (Bruce Bawer, NY Sun, 12/8, Op.-Ed).

I got the Swedish Consulate's press officer to read that article. She declined to refute it. To me, that confirms its basic facts and thesis. Sweden is liberal fascist. Imagine, no secret ballot, no freedom of speech and press, punishment of dissidents, and high crime! The Left has degenerated largely into authoritarian activists and naďve followers.

SEC. RICE TALKS THROUGH HER HAT

She said, "There really is a divide between those who wish to see a Middle East, for instance, in which a Palestinian state can sit side by side with an Israeli democratic state and live in peace and security. It's very clear who favors that and who doesn't." (IMRA, 12/10.)

She means that people in the Mideast feel that way. If it is so clear who they are, why doesn't she name some? She never has. Who are these mysterious Muslim Arabs of tolerance? What power do they have? If none, what does their belief matter? I think she doesn't name any because they don't count and if identified they would be assassinated. No use, they.

HAMAS' OFFER TO ISRAEL

The head of Hamas told Israel that if it withdrew to the 1967 borders (meaning gave up the Old City, part of the New City, other towns, and Judaism's holiest sites), release all the security prisoners (i.e., terrorists), and solved the refugee problem (meaning allowed enough Arabs in to take over the country), he would offer it a 5-year truce (IMRA, 12/9).

During the 5 years, Hamas would arm for a big war. In other words, if Israel gave Hamas the means to conquer it, Hamas, whose word is not to be believed, since it fires a couple of rockets a day under "ceasefire," would hold off for five years. Big deal!

IRAQ STUDY PANEL: More

The panel wants to reduce the number of US troops in Iraq, when the need is to increase them, until the Iraqi army reforms and then gets trained. Meanwhile, the Iraqi troops are loyal to militias pursuing ethnic agendas, contrary to a national purpose. They take the equipment we give them and disappear. The government has no national purpose, but represents sects and nationalities.

The proposal for regional diplomacy is a funny one. All the countries in the region vie for influence in Iraq. The Iraq war is bringing out the divisiveness in the Mideast (and the lack of centrality of the Arab-Israel conflict, which actually is a unifying force).

The sacrifice of Israel, far distant from Iraq, would not stop the competing ethnic groups' struggle for control of government and oil revenues. To think it would is yet another absurdity (Youssef Ibrahim, NY Sun, 12/11, p.4).

SYRIA PREPARING FOR WAR

Syria is moving anti-tank missiles closer to the border with Israel. Assad has ordered more long-range missiles. He is working simultaneously on military and diplomatic options. Israel is training its forces more (IMRA, 12/10).

With the West, diplomacy follows war. With the Muslims, war and diplomacy are cyclical -- each method prepares the way for the other. The West considers itself smarter, but doesn't understand how the Arabs operate.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

KNESSET APPROVES DRACONIAN REGULATIONS WITHOUT RIGHT OF PERUSAL
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 3, 2007.


This comes from Israeljustice.com (December 27, 2006) and it was archived at
www.israeljustice.com/news2.asp?key=27

JERUSALEM -- Israel's parliament has approved draconian measures against Jewish opponents of the government's withdrawal policy without being allowed to read the document.

The government measures, said to remain in effect today, were approved by a special Knesset committee in late 2005 in a closed session. Attorney General Menachem Mazuz, who helped draft the proposals allowed only one parliamentarian to review the document, which enabled the detention of thousands of people, many of them without formal charges.

"The police have issued guidelines to the prosecutors and to the police prosecutors in regard to implementation of the Disengagement [withdrawal] plan and they said that these guidelines are secret," Knesset member Michael Eitan, then chairman of the Constitution and Law Committee, said.

Eitan led the meeting of the committee during a secret session on Aug. 7, 2005, on the eve of the Israeli expulsion of 16,000 Jews from the GazaStrip and northern West Bank. During the meeting, a transcript of which was recently obtained, Eitan acknowledged that the regulations proposed by Mazuz were draconian and violated civil rights.

"I received a complaint that the police have issued draconian guidelines to act in a certain way against demonstrators," Eitan said. "And there Is a prosecution policy that was especially tailored to repress the demonstrators and to harm their rights."

In April 2005, Mazuz, who quashed a police investigation into corruption by then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, issued a secret four-page guideline to police, prosecutors and judges regarding efforts to counter the campaign to block the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank. The document included the use of administrative detentions, or imprisonment without charges, the treatment of minors as adults and the arrest of peaceful protesters.

"A fight that is ideologically-motivated causes all parties involved to become more radical," Mazuz told the Israel Bar Association in May 2005. "This forces us to monitor the process on a daily basis."

"The courts have demonstrated a stern approach and approved most of our requests for arrests, including arrests until the end of judicial proceedings," Mazuz added.

Officials said the guidelines enabled the arrest and imprisonment of about 4,000 Jewish opponents of the Sharon government by September 2005. They said many of them were ordered to be held for months until trial.

"They arrested people collectively," attorney Gadi Tal, who has represented anti-government defendants, said. "No judge checked to see the evidence up front. The worst cases were during the Disengagement: A minor who sat a week in jail and no indictment was issued against him. On the face of it, there was no evidence. From the outset they shouldn't have been jailed."

In August 2005, Deputy State Prosecutor Shai Nitzan told the Knesset Law and Constitution Committee that his office issued 634 indictments against withdrawal protesters. Nitzan said that more than 200 of them were against minors.

The State Prosecutor has acknowledged that authorities have operated in accordance to the secret guidelines. A spokeswoman said the guidelines remain classified nearly 18 months after the withdrawal.

"The state prosecutor's office issued specific guidelines for internal use, which were not meant to be published," Justice Ministry spokeswoman Ganit Ben-Moshe told Israeljustice.com. "The guidelines were presented in full before the subcommittee of the Knesset Constitution and Law Committee. The Guidelines were then presented with some paragraphs erased to the entire committee."

But the transcript of the August 2005 session of the Knesset committee asserted that only Eitan had access to the redacted document. During the hearing, Eitan, who termed Mazuz's secrecy requirements "ludicrous," read portions of the proposed legislation to two other members.

At one point, Knesset member Roni Bar-On, today a minister in the government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, suggested that the guidelines and their secrecy were undemocratic. Bar-On, who has yet to discuss the hearing in public, protested Mazuz's insistence that nobody other than Eitan, who has refused to comment on the hearing, be allowed to see the document.

"Guidelines regarding indictments are secret?" Bar-On asked. "What could guidelines that concern indictments contain? It's every person's basic right to know what are the guidelines of the attorney general or any other decision-making body."

"I have a systematic problem," Bar-On added. "If they tell us that we Knesset members can't be privy to material that the state prosecutor and police have seen, then I'm not willing to play the game. I don't understand the purpose of our session. Is it to be able to say in due time that the constitution committee dealt with this?"

Still, the committee, which did not hold a vote, was recorded as approving the government guidelines. Eitan said the guidelines related to the prosecution of minors, police treatment of violent protesters and charging demonstration leaders with sedition.

"There were certainly issues that upset us," Knesset member Naomi Blumenthal, who also attended the secret session, told Israeljustice.com.

In October 2005, Mazuz issued another set of guidelines on the treatment of those practicing civil disobedience against the government's withdrawal policy. The document authorized the dismissal of charges against protesters who did not employ violence or minors without a prior criminal record.

But attorneys for the Jewish detainees said the prosecution has ignored the new guidelines and still operate according to the draconian regulations approved in August 2005. They said prosecutors continue to indict minors and others on trivial charges.

"The judges do not throw out cases on the basis of 'deminimus,' attorney Eytan Lehman, referring to the principle that the judicial system does not prosecute trivial charges, said. "They rely on the authority of the prosecutor and his judgement. There is no supervision in the attorney general's office as to whether they abided by the guidelines or not."

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

JIMMY CARTER -- A BRAIN IN NEUTRAL -- REDUX
Posted by Norman Liebmann, January 3, 2007.

[Note: Had it been anticipated that Jimmy Carter would one day be Governor of Georgia, Abe Lincoln would have been the first one to endorse that state's secession from the Union. Carter has made much of his barn building for rustics most of whom think a toilet is an indoor wishing well. Carter's enterprise, such as it is, does not redeem his treachery, although one could hardly foretell such duplicity could be conjured up by that Tobacco Road mentality.

In light of Carter's recent re-eruptions of treason and calumny against the United States of America I feel constrained to get into my moon suit and re-rake the pasture strewn with Jimmy Carter's Trojan Horse droppings.]

To paraphrase H.L. Mencken, no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of Jimmy Carter. Even Mencken would have been astonished at just how much Carter lowered the crap threshold of the American people -- which subsequently coagulated into the infamous Clinton Administration.

Early on, Jimmy's brain slid into Neutral and has been idling there ever since. Carter is as quick-witted as an anvil. His world view is flakier than an apple strudel, and his absence of grasp is exceeded only by his capacity for misconception. One might describe his intellect as chronic run-of-the-mill. His is a mentality in a state of alertness bordering on coma. When he speaks extemporaneously he sounds like Tommy Smothers on Quaaludes. Most politicians' speeches are taped on Memorex. Carter's are taped on Sominex. He needs the Auto Club to show up with jumper cables to get his frontal lobe to turn over in the morning. Someone must have slipped some valium into his grits. As long as forty years ago, associates began to describe him as prematurely dense. This is a mind totally at rest inside a skull that should be in a garage up on blocks. His brain is rarely used, and, at age seventy eight, it still has the original paint.

Currently, Jimmy is sounding the alarm that war will be catastrophic -- although the more appropriate word would be Carterstrophic. What's holding up Armageddon is Clinton having sold our nuclear missiles to China which will be returned in the downward arc of the parabola any day now.

HOW HE GOT THAT WAY

Carter is just a simple country boy determined to save the world in his spare time. He nurtures the idea that forgiveness is within his province, not God's, and has offered to gather the world's terrorists together for a gang absolution. His politics are middle-of-the-road, and in his rural home town of Plaines, Georgia, it is hardly necessary to tell folks what you find in the middle of the road. Early on, he adopted Neville Chamberlain's suicidal kiss of death approach to diplomacy. In fact, Carter was the only farmer in Georgia to name his mule Neville.

Jimmy's Goody Two Shoes Styrofoam humanitarianism motivated him to found Hovels for Humanity, a group dedicated to erecting precisely what the nation does not need -- more middle income slums. Carter has built so many outhouses the flies refer to him as a colleague. (Like bugs, Democrats are no longer a political party, but an infestation.) Despite his self-proclaimed expertise, professional carpenters say Jimmy Carter doesn't know a shed from Shinola. It is not known where he got the inspiration that an outhouse needs a front porch. Despite his reputation for hammering up these bowel bungalows, two weeks after he finishes one, the only thing holding it together is the cobwebs.

Nobody in his home town of Plaines, Georgia anticipated that Jimmy would one day grow up to be America's first Sharecropper-in-Chief and the only President to be sworn into office with his hand on a feed catalogue. When a carnival fortuneteller predicted he would end up in Washington D.C., Jimmy asked her, "What big city is that near?" (The only other famous person from Plaines was a local prizefighter named Mohammad Yokum, who is remembered for the saying, "Float like a butterfly, smell like a barn.")

His aversion to violence inspired Carter to talk to officials of the Southeast Conference into letting him settle the football championship of the Conference by allowing him to negotiate the outcome. The result was twofold:

1. Nobody lost.
2. Everyone went home feeling like shit.

Sports buffs still refer to that game as "The Wuss Bowl." His motivation is explained when you realize he was the Captain of the Hopscotch team of his high school called the Georgia Geldings.

Jimmy will go out of his way to avoid bloodshed. He made no effort to resist when he had his pocket picked by an ATM machine -- and in an effort to duck any violence during a holdup in an antique store, he surrendered to a cuckoo clock. Some folks think of him as the Fredo Corleone of the South. His pacifist inclination makes it conceivable, if Jimmy had been around to defend Dixie, Sherman would not have marched through Georgia -- he would have skipped through.

NAVY

Jimmy attended Annapolis, where, after hearing his obsequious mewlings, the other Midshipmen were tempted to scuttle the Naval Academy. Carter still has his ceremonial sword, which he plans to surrender as soon as the right dictator comes along.

As an Ensign, Carter, a sanctimonious preachy sort of officer, was unpopular with the crew who managed to avoid him -- which is not easy to do aboard a submarine. Presumably, the first time he ever saw indoor plumbing was aboard the sub, where he managed to make the quantum leap from an outhouse to a nuclear commode. (The Navy rejected his idea of putting a screen door on the sub.) To this day, wherever Carter served is still specified on naval maps as hick-infested waters.

[Note: In the nuclear Navy, Carter learned to use the cyclotron, a circular particle accelerator in which charged subatomic particles generated at a central source are accelerated spirally outward in a plane perpendicular to a fixed magnetic field by an alternating electric field -- capable of generating particle energies between a few million and several tens of millions of electron volts. Carter brought one back to his farm to see if it could shell peanuts.]

POLITICS

In the Oval Office, Jimmy Carter evolved from The Little Man Who Wasn't There, into The Little Man Who Might as Well Not Have Been There. His efforts in government gave failure a bad name. The high interest and uncontrolled inflation he brought about came to be called "The Misery Index." His disastrous economy prevented him from getting his picture on the cover of Time, but he did get it on Proctologists Quarterly -- appropriately enough on the back cover. Jimmy could only do business in the Oval Office each day until four o'clock, because he had to be back at "the home" by five. His reputation as Commander-in-Chief was discredited by a helicopter traffic jam he choreographed in the Iranian desert. After that fiasco, his reproach to aggressors has been confined to saying "tsk tsk."

Just as Arabs trek to Mecca, it has become obligatory for craven Democrat politicians to make a pilgrimage up Fidel Castro's descending colon where they get "castro-ated." (These days the traffic to Havana is heavy with Democrat liberals eager to sit in Fidel Castro's lap, so they snort rainbows and pound sunshine up each other's asses.) After five minutes of conversation, one might say Fidel had the credulous Carter by the scruples.

Carter's altruism prompted him to give the Panama Canal to the Chinese without even getting a campaign contribution or an egg roll in exchange. He is lobbying the Bush White House to establish a National Give a Canal to a Communist Week. In his effort to ingratiate himself with the Iranians (who had humiliated his Administration in the hostage crisis) Jimmy has asked Hallmark to design a greeting card that says Happy Mullahs' Day. He proclaimed his brotherly affection for Syrian despot, Hafez al Assad who, happily, is no longer with us, and has proven to be, to quote Oscar Wilde, "... one of those people who is immeasurably improved by death."

Carter is like a eunuch who keeps trying to show everyone he meets the scar from his operation. His meek and submissive posture earned him little respect around the world. When he traveled to foreign capitals aboard Air Force One, crowds rushed out onto the tarmac to moon him while his plane was still in the glide path.

Carter probably still believes the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor was unintentional, never forgave America for winning WW 2, and considers our military a bunch of sore winners. Carter's oddball logic instructs him that everyone has human rights -- but loses them the moment he decides they are worth fighting for. Carter is not a peace-nik. He's a surrender-nik. Forget about Al Qaeda terrorists. Butterflies can flutter him into submission. (Anticipating her husband's plan for capitulation to come to fruition, Rosalynn Carter is always busy rinsing out a few white flags.)

Jimmy is currently urging that America disarm. Apparently, he does not realize that the nation already had a program of disarmament. It was called the Clinton Administration. It is the measure of Carter's gullibility that he believes that Satan and Clinton mean well. We can humor him about that. He also naively believes that treason and pregnancy are always unintentional. This was after innumerable state dinners at which he thought he heard Clinton raise his glass and offer his favorite toast -- "Ladies and Gentlemen, here's wishing aid and comfort to the enemy."

Carter missed his vocation as a holy roller where that wellspring of piety would not have gone to waste. His solution to the problems of the Middle East is to add priggishness to the dialogue. It is his mission to clog the public discourse with mealy chunks of sanctimony. His speeches exude a gummy residue that obstructs drains. Mop-up squads in moon suits from Roto Rooter are ready to "snake" the public address system after he's through talking. In Washington, addressing The Million Appeaser March, he advanced his theme that the well-being of the world depends on the survival of all the nations -- except the civilized ones.

NOBEL

Carter's intellectual vacancy proved no barrier to his being given a Nobel Prize for Peace, an award established by Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. It is ironic that its most recent recipient should be Jimmy Carter, the inventor of the damp fuse. Since he returned from Norway with the award, Oslo has become just another four letter word. It is still said by Norwegians that Carter is up the fjord without a paddle.

[Note: Much is explained by the fact that The Nobel Prize is awarded by a committee which makes especially poignant the aphorism that a camel is a horse that was put together by a committee. The Nobel gang has been passing out so many of these Peace diplomas that they've given their Xerox machine a hernia.]

Considering their indiscriminate distribution, these days there seems to be a Nobel Peace Prize inside every box of Cracker Jacks. Jimmy received his at a drive-up window along with a side of French fries and a complimentary lobotomy (which is healing more slowly than was hoped.) Carter claimed his Prize in his semi-official capacity as a Citizen of the World (a pompous, asinine assertion to start with) which means, instead of just being disloyal to one country at a time, he can be disloyal to all of them at once. The Nobel Prize confirmed Carter, like Yasser Arafat and Nelson Mandela, as another cog in the Bill Clinton Diplomatic Road to Hell Machine. Thus credentialed, Carter, the inveterate do-gooder, once again off his leash, is offering to negotiate a peace agreement in the Middle East, though his track record instructs us that he doesn't know an Ayatollah from a pig's asshollah. The last time he negotiated peace in Islam, it provoked the assassination of Anwar Sadat.

Islamists keep telling Carter that America must surrender, but Carter keeps holding out for total capitulation. Carter is a mea culpa on his way to happen. Show me a despot and I'll show you a Jimmy Carter before him on his knees. Carter shouldn't have been given the Nobel Prize. He should have been given the No Balls Prize.

Looking back on his career, Jimmy Carter's only moment of genuine candor came during his interview with Playboy Magazine in which he confessed to once having had lust in his heart. It was later revealed it wasn't lust, but dust -- and it wasn't in his heart, it was in his shorts.

James Earl Carter ...

Four years at the United States Naval Academy ...

What a waste

Norman Liebmann is a free-lance political commentator and staff writer for Ether Zone. He is a former television writer (Johnny Carson, Dean Martin), wrote and produced Chico and the Man. He created the characters for The Munsters (who are all named after his relatives) and worked on legendary TV shows such as Baretta and the Dick Van Dyke Show as well as in feature films and theatre. He can be reached at firehat@adelphia.net Or visit his website -- Fire Hat -- at http://www.firehat.com/newsbrowse.ph

This article is archived at
http://www.firehat.com/newsbrowse.php?group_id=&letter_id=471

To Go To Top

ISRAEL'S CHRISTIAN POPULATION GROWS, P.A.'S DWINDLES
Posted by Richard H. Shulman, January 2, 2007.

ISRAEL'S CHRISTIAN POPULATION GROWS, P.A.'S DWINDLES; "HUMANITARIAN AID"

Israel has adopted tolerance, whereas the P.A. officially adopted exclusivist Islam. Christians are fleeing the P.A.. whereas Israel restored many churches and monasteries.

The irony is that tens of thousands of Christians have felt sufficiently threatened by Islamism to abandon ancient holy sites, while the Arabs accuse Israel of forcing Arabs out of the area and of oppressing other religions.

Now the P.A. blames the security fence, whose route Israel plots with care for the Christians. Israel has negotiated the route directly with Christian communities, and changed the route a number of times for them. Most Christians who left did so before the fence was planned.

Complaints that fence construction uproots olive trees and bars villagers from water are false or misleading. In the village of Aboud, cited as an example, the water source was kept on the village side of the fence and Israel paid compensation for the trees.

Don't want the fence there? Simple. End terrorism. Make peace.

Justus Reid Weiner of the Wechsler Family Foundation writes, "From Christian Arabs under the thumb of the PA, I have heard testimony of forced marriages of Christian women to Muslim men, death threats against Christians for distributing the Bible to willing Muslims, and Christian women intimidated into wearing traditional ultra-modest Islamic clothing. Churches have been firebombed (most recently in Nablus, Tubas, and Gaza when the Pope made his controversial remarks) and/or shot up repeatedly. And this is the tip of the iceberg."

"Under the Palestinian Authority, whose constitution gives Islamic law primacy over all other sources of law, Christian Arabs have found their land expropriated by Muslim thieves and thugs with ties to the PA's land registration office. hristians have been forced to pay bribes to win the freedom of family members jailed on trumped-up charges. And Arabs -- Christians and Muslims alike -- have been selling or abandoning homes and businesses to escape the chaos of the PA and move to Israel, Europe, South America, North America, or wherever they can get a visa."

If Israel were so oppressive as accused, let the accusers explain why its Christian population has quadrupled, whereas hundreds of thousands of Christians have emigrated from the Arab states and the P.A. (IMRA, 12/7).

Note how illogical as well as false are some of the accusations against Israel! Why don't Christian denominations show grace and praise Israel for treating the faithful tolerantly, a beautiful story deserving publicity as a light unto the world? Why don't organized Christian denominations denounce the Muslim Arabs for mistreating fellow Christians? Old-line or liberal Christian denominations and some universities want to divest from Israel on the grounds that it mistreats the Arabs, when only the reverse is true. Other false charges are about Israel "grabbing Arab land," when it isn't "Arab" but Jewish and the Arabs are trying to grab it. Still other false charges are that Israel destroys Arabs' olive trees, but it is the Arabs who destroy them and then ask Israel for "compensation."

The truth about Israel's decency and the Muslim Arabs' viciousness is repressed.

NO ANSWER FROM GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL

I sent this to two public relations officials in the government of Israel. One was Miri.Eisin@it.pmo.gov.il. Neither replied.

Sometimes the IDF displays the weaponry it captures, but mostly it does not.

After raiding Beit Hanoun, the IDF stated that it had uncovered large weapons caches. If it had showed the discovery to reporters, its mission would seem more justified. Audiences of those reporters who reiterate the IDF findings would understand what those Arabs are up to. Otherwise, people think that Israel is over-reacting (after an errant shell struck some non-combatants).

Would you arrange for reporters to enter such an area on the tail end of the battle and be in a position to report the findings?

It would be ideal if the Prime Minister, who can get press attention, were, himself to report the findings. He then could bring photographs of that to meetings and press briefings in Europe, to show that Israel is not over-reacting and to disillusion them about the western Palestinian Arabs being the victims rather than the aggressors.

PRISONER & CASUALTY EXCHANGES

In the past 10 years, terrorists released by Israel murdered 122 Israelis and wounded many others. The number of Israelis exchanged for them was many fewer than 122. Hundreds more were killed and wounded by terrorists released in the decade before that (Arutz-7, 12/8),

Israelis are kidnapped in the hope of exchanging them for a great number of Arabs. For Israel, the exchange is too uneven to pay, but it does it anyway.

HUMANITARIAN AID

Despite Quartet boycott of the P.A. for continuing its state of terrorist war with Israel, everybody is sending aid to the P.A.. Iran increased its aid for anti-humanitarian purposes, and the Arabs did, to compete. Israel approved aid for humanitarian purposes. The UNO is in a supposedly humanitarian fundraising campaign for the P.A ... Congress is passing legislation banning US aid except humanitarian (Arutz-7, 12/8).

They call it humanitarian, but it props up the inhumane Hamas regime. Imagine if during WWII, the world poured in funds, in the name of being humanitarian, to besieged Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, those beastly governments! Isn't it odd that so much effort goes to undeserving Muslim jihadists in the P.A., while the victims of Muslim jihad in Darfur get so little? The aid is not humanitarian, but they call it humanitarian as an excuse to keep up the war on the Jews. Alternatively, there gets to be an irrational political correctness about not letting those Muslims down.

Richard Shulman is a veteran defender of Israel on several web-based forums. His comments and analyses appear often on Think-Israel. He provides cool information and right-on-target overviews. He distributes his essays by email. To subscribe, write him at richardshulman5@verizon.com.

To Go To Top

OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS
Posted by Lawrence Uniglicht, January 2, 2007.

Opportunity sometimes knocks when least expected. Conditions are ripe for Israel to maximize its position in a highly dysfunctional Middle East, where a violent thirteen-century Sunni Shiite war yet again rears its religiously intolerant head, for now confined to mortally wounded Iraq. A pie-in-the-sky Bush Administration, presumably intent on instituting democracy within a tri-furcated regime composed mostly of Arab Shiites with substantial numbers of Arab Sunnis and non-Arab Kurds, less than cognizant of the fact that a now departed Baathist Sunni Arab Sadist Hussein corked a pressurized bottle with his tyrannical thumb allowing minority rule to prevail as well as keeping proximate Persian Shiite neighbor Iran's ambitious agenda in check, toppled the Sadistic tyrant with a less than sufficient number of troops, gravely upset the Islamic applecart, and most importantly allowed predator Iran to extend Medusa like tentacles into the septic bowels, saturated with freed vengeful Shiites, of its former nemesis. Furthermore, the fact that the Persian Shiite fundamentalist Islamic theocracy remains besotted on oil revenues extorted from energy addicted industrial nations allows it to underwrite Israel despising terrorist proxies Hamas and Hizbullah, as well as finance its Dr. Strangelove nuclear ambition manifesting in fissile material purifying spinning centrifuges that won't quit no matter what a toothless United Nations or fossil fuel dependent world says or does. Granted, leaning on financial institutions to cease dealing with Iran and persuading certain industrial nations to limit commercial projects with that rogue state has some impact, still only bends but does not break the back of an obsessed president and mullahs on a mission, especially when comrades like Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez, classless fossil fuel suppliers of world class importance, counteract those efforts. All this is enough to fray the prayer rugs and scare the turbans off of a Koran worshipping, 'I do it my way', mostly Sunni Middle Eastern populace, noting that Iran's movers and shakers including madman AhMADinejad and his fundamentally loony mullahs await the coming of an Imam with no tolerance for infidels including such Sunnis, flex their cash-for-oil pumped up muscles, ally with Allawite Shiite ruled Syria soon to be augmented by a hapless Hizbullah infected Lebanon, while fixing for a turf war armed with nukes. This is where Israel comes in.

Sunni Muslim Arabs, especially in Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, are not at all enamored by any prospect of a so-called Palestinian state ruled by Iranian financed thus obligated Hamas. Additionally, a Golan Heights treasonously ceded to Iranian ally Syria, further extending the reach and confidence of a Shiite axis aiming to advance its intolerant fundamentalist neo-Ottoman 'holier than thou' quest at the expense of Arabs with contrary theological opinions, far outweighs any consequential damage to Israel in the less mentioned 'maybe I'll be the next casualty' Machiavellian mind-sets of Sunni Arab movers and shakers. Thus, Israeli leaders should clandestinely approach Sunni autocrats, obsessed with their own hides, making them an offer they can't refuse. Tell them Israel would be willing to slay the Persian Shiite Medusa, surgically taking out that diseased ever-extending unpopular agenda-driven beast militarily with the aid of a Mossad inspired revolutionary Iranian youth movement, for the mere price of treating the Jewish State with respect. In other words, stop inciting the Arab street to hate Jews/Israel, stop funding Jew/infidel despising Wahhabi madrassas a/k/a human bomb factories, replace educational text books that teach youngsters two Jews plus two Jews equal four dead Jews, and consider creating a so-called Palestinian State in Jordan instead of cramming one into tiny Israel, less than two tenths of one per cent the size of a mostly Muslim Jew-bereft Middle East.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend (at least temporarily) trumps all other considerations when Sunni-perceived enemy morphed to friend Israel has the fire power, moxie, and smarts to put out a relative brush fire progressing ever swiftly to a full blown diabolical Shiite nuclear inferno in the tremulous psyches of Sunni 'martyrdoms not for me' autocrats, not at all enamored at the prospect of being booted from their respective thrones, disintegrating in a Riyadh nanosecond, or worse yet being painfully decapitated. Prescient Israeli leaders must not ignore the opportunity presented by a 'perfect storm' of events now forming in the Middle East. Prime Minister Olmert and his Knesset can ill afford to go wobbly letting Iran go nuclear. If they do, their legacy could live in infamy!

Lawrence Uniglicht is a career civil servant, working for the Social Security Administration. He advocates for the State of Israel with an American perspective. He writes, "Advocating for the disrespected underdog has been my passion, no doubt Israel falls into that category." Contact him by email at luniglicht@snip.net

To Go To Top

MOVING BEYONG SHOCK AND FATIGUE
Posted by Daryl Temkin, January 2, 2007.

It seems that almost every day, if not every other day, there is an overwhelming and befuddling news event which shocks the mind. The last six years have been pain-filled years in reference to events and decisions surrounding the Middle East and specifically, the State of Israel. So many uncalled- for events and poorly made political decisions have occurred that just do not make sense. Many recent events indicate that the forces of good are allowed to be eroded, weakened and made vulnerable to an impending defeat. In these cases there appears to have been no application of wisdom in the decision- making process.

The phrase, "it doesn't make sense", challenges the minds of many concerned and devoted political thinkers. In the course of life, one understands that certain decisions will occur that will not make sense. However, it is a different story when the reaction of "it doesn't make sense" becomes a consistent response. The result of such an experience is a communal helplessness which can often lead to feelings of depression.

During the Gaza Disengagement, as rockets were flying onto Israeli towns, Prime Minister Sharon told the world that Israel would not withdraw under fire, yet Israel withdrew in spite of the enemy fire. The whole story of the Gaza Disengagement was, from beginning to end, filled with ill-conceived and faulty explanations. A confused public constantly asked, "Why is Sharon doing this?"

Since no reasonable answer was discovered even by Sharon's close friends, Knesset Minister Nathan Sharansky and top Likud Party Knesset Member Uzi Landau, a "magical thinking" answer came forth, "If you sat in the seat of the Prime Minister, you would understand."

After Sharon's demise, now, people ask, "Why is Olmert doing this?"

Last week's news reported that Israel is again bolstering up its sworn enemy. The report stated stunning news of Israel releasing 100 million dollars to its enemy, the Palestinian Fatah Party. This information was followed several days later with the report that Israel will permit Egypt to deliver to the Fatah an additional two thousand brand new assault rifles, 20,000 bullet magazines, and two million rounds of ammunition. This is in addition to the untold tons of weapons and explosives that have been "smuggled" into Gaza through the virtual "open border" crossings and the estimated 180 to 250 smuggling tunnels.

The "politically acceptable" claim is that the gifts of arms and money will somehow only go to the "moderate Palestinians," meaning the Fatah Party, and will only be used against the "extremists", the Hamas Party.

First of all, the commonly stated belief that there is a "moderate Palestinian" faction named Fatah, which just happens to head the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, is a frightening and serious delusion. Furthermore, the so-called "moderate" Palestinian leaders, by slip of tongue, have already declared that the new arms gift will be used against the Israelis and not against their Palestinian brethren. We can expect that the truth will be somewhere in the middle, both, some Palestinians, likely those who are the "real" Palestinian moderates, who are called "informants" and a lot of Israelis, will be the eventual murdered recipients of the over two million bullets.

Then comes Olmert offering what was referred to as a "traditional goodwill" gift to the Palestinians prior to the Muslim holiday, "Id-al-Adha". What was to be Olmert's "traditional" holiday gift? Freeing imprisoned Palestinian terrorists. Thankfully, at the last minute, miraculously, the gift was rescinded.

Does anyone remember what "goodwill" gift the Palestinians presented Israel for Chanukah other than eight days and nights of launching "ceasefire rockets" on the Western Negev and the city of Sderot?

Isn't providing the Palestinians with freed terrorist prisoners similar to providing an alcoholic who is supposed to be working on sobriety with holiday presents of liquor? The very thing that we are asking the Palestinians to stop is what we are gifting them? Couldn't Israel give Gaza a present of something benign like animals for a petting zoo or books for a school library? Why a present of releasing seasoned and ready to perform terrorists?

Then there is the question of gift giving without merit. This gift of freed terrorist prisoners was offered without even a minuscule sign of merit. That means, there is no recognition of responsibility for one's behavior in reference to the gift received. What kind of education does this provide and reinforce for those desiring Israel's destruction?

Furthermore, it must be clarified that Israel wanting its kidnapped soldiers returned is not the same as the Palestinians wanting to have all the captured Palestinian terrorist prisoners released and returned. The Israelis want their kidnapped soldiers returned so that they can rejoin their families and try their utmost to return to a normal and productive life. It is well understood that the release of what is expected to be over 1,400 imprisoned Palestinian terrorists is not limited to the purpose of just being returned to their families, but the desire for their release is for a very different and deadly cause.

In June of 2005, Ehud Olmert, then Deputy Prime Minister, announced that Israelis are "tired of fighting and tired of winning". Those words were a signal that Israel was willing to do virtually anything that its enemies or the world's "peace negotiators" would ask. "Being tired" apparently became a sign of Israel's future appeasement policy.

What is so alarming is that for crucial life events and crucial life decisions, a leader of the Jewish people, doesn't have the choice of saying "I'm tired!" or "we're tired!" A leader's job is to inspire "energy" even when the going gets tough.

Imagine being at Lincoln Center's Avery Fisher Hall and attending the New York Philharmonic's performance of Mahler's hundred minute long marathon symphony, featuring the full 120 piece orchestra and 120 voice choir. Then, shockingly, sixty minutes into the concert, the world class conductor stops and announces to the audience that his arms are tired, he feels that his musicians are tired, and the choir has sung enough.

The audience, stunned, bewildered, and amazed knows very well that the Mahler symphony is one of the longest, most difficult and most demanding to perform musical pieces, but the audience also knows that every musician on stage including the conductor is one of the world's best, and in spite of fatigue, very capable of playing to the symphony's last note.

Fatigue is a part of life but no person becomes a great musician, athlete, leader, scientist or victor of anything when he or she only focuses on their fatigue and forgets that their mission is to get to the last note. Fatigue is often the excuse used to sacrifice living up to high yet achievable standards.

An associate shared a story from his elementary school life. There was a bully in his class who frequently picked on him. Finally, he and the bully began fighting and the fight became a prolonged ordeal. Fatigue and exhaustion overtook the student but he knew he couldn't quit. Then, just moments before he was about to deliver his final possible punch, the bully gave up and conceded defeat. Holding out for that final moment was what made all the difference and put the bully to rest.

To overcome fatigue at the crucial moment is what is expected from Israel and her leaders because there is no choice but to be victorious all the way to the final note. Israel is a world class country made up of a world class people and they must not be allowed to forget that they are fully capable of being strong and standing up for the values which are their real gift to the world.

Now, after too many months of fallacious, bewildering, and precarious decisions, it appears as if Israel forgot that it was the victor of five demanding military conflicts. Too often, these decision debacles that receive the "it doesn't make sense" response appear because Israel seems to be acting to strengthen its enemies and weaken itself. One gets the impression that Israel behaves as if its enemy won those wars and thereby earned the upper hand for all negotiations.

This problem and self-misperception must be revised, and if not immediately eliminated, will bring Israel to its ultimate doom. One must move beyond the shock of past failures and the thoughts of fatigue. Otherwise, there will be no remaining opportunity to wake up, to regroup and rebuild, as well as to uphold and reinforce the ethical vision that Israel stands for; without which there will be a severe and disastrous loss to the whole world.

Daryl Temkin, Ph.D. is the director of the Israel Education Institute which is devoted to teaching history and contemporary issues of Israel to Jews and Non-Jews. Dr. Temkin can be reached at: DT@Israel-Institute.com.

To Go To Top

SHURAT HADIN PETITIONS COURT OVER STATE'S REFUSAL TO DEFEND SDEROT RESIDENTS
Posted by Naomi Ragen, January 2, 2007.

Fifty Sderot Residents Ask Court to Declare Them Exempt From Paying Taxes if IDF is Restrained From Responding to Missiles

Fifty residents of the Southern Israeli city of Sderot have petitioned the District Court this morning to declare them exempt from paying taxes in light of the State's refusal to provide adequate military protection to their community. The plaintiffs claim that the Government's policy of restraint against the on-going Palestinian rocket attacks has endangered their families' lives and encouraged the terrorist organizations to escalate their attacks. They are demanding that that until Sderot is given the same level of military protection provided by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to all other cities in the Jewish State that they not be obligated to pay taxes to the Israeli government.

In addition, the Sderot residents are requesting that they receive a tax refund for all the amounts paid to the State since June 2004, which is the month that the deadly Palestinian missiles claimed the first civilian life in Sderot. As the plaintiffs' court papers state: "From this date the State of Israel was on notice that the Qassam rockets began to seriously endanger the lives of the Sderot residents and nevertheless refused to provide the appropriate military response to the terrorists." The law suit draws a connection between the historic obligation of a citizen to pay taxes to the government and the duty of the State to militarily defend the lives of the taxpaying citizen from foreign aggressors. According to the plaintiffs, this social contract, which is the basis of any political framework, imposes civic obligations on the citizens of the state in exchange for the government acting to protect their natural rights including their physical safety. Citizens, they claim, only are obligated to pay taxes when and if the government is under a similar duty to defend them. The State of Israel has breached its duty to employ the IDF to defend the residents of Sderot from the Palestinians.

The Sderot residents are represented in the petition by Shurat HaDin -- Israel Law Center Director Nitsana Darshan-Leitner.

According to attorney Darshan-Leitner: "The Government's immoral decision to neglect the safety and rights of the residents of Sderot and it surrounding communities to further its diplomatic relations with the United States and Europe must be opposed. The State's first obligation must be to safeguard its citizens and to utilize all its military might to destroy the terrorists firing rockets from Gaza. The State cannot impose tax obligations on the residents of the Negev even as it abandons them to the Palestinian terrorists' attacks. We are asking the District Court to declare that the residents in the Negev areas under continuous Qassam attacks, who the State has told to `fend for themselves,' are no longer obligated to pay any taxes to the State of Israel. If the IDF won't fight, Sderot residents aren't going to pay."

FOR MORE INFORMATION & A COPY OF THE PETITION:
info@israellawcenter.org
Israel Tel.: 03-7361519
US Tel.: 212-591-0073

Naomi Ragen is an American-born novelist and journalist who lives in Jerusalem. She can be contacted at www.naomiragen.com, where you can subscribe to her newsletter.

To Go To Top

EILAT VACATION
Posted by Rachel Saperstein, January 2, 2007.

We spent three days in Eilat as guests of One Family, an organization aiding terror victims and their families. There were two hundred of us, a victim and his/her spouse or parent. What a picturesque group we were: artificial limbs, crutches, wheelchairs, scarred and burnt faces, useless limbs, and those whose wounds could not be seen as they were internal.

After a hectic Channuka getting the Orange Gallery delivered and our website functioning, not to mention visits by the children and grandchildren, I decided we needed a vacation. When One Family invited us to join the group to Eilat we agreed to go.

Behind the wounds are remarkable people. Soldiers wounded in action, civilians maimed in terror attacks. A variety of organizations work for the injured. What makes One Family special is that they never make us feel incapable or incomplete. Each of us was treated without pity or condescension.

Everyone went on the camel ride except one lady who decided the back of an undulating camel isn't where she wanted to be. The 'heroine of Gush Katif' screamed "Get me down from here!" Yep, it was me.

And no, I didn't take the walk on the ropes extended between two trees. I hope you'll all forgive me for my poor showing. I'd rather fight the establishment than ride a camel or walk the ropes.

Imagine how our Torah would read if our mothers Rebecca and Rachel had refused to ride their camels...

Bless One Family for their goodness and caring for the people of Israel who are so badly hurt and suffer their wounds each day. Brought together, they can laugh and feel whole in the safe environment of a One Family outing.

We returned to a storm-ridden Nitzan. The wind howled and the sound of dumpsters crashing into the street brought back memories of Gush Katif mortar explosions.

Rain water had accumulated in the land depression near the Orange Gallery. A lake had formed and though the Gallery, up on blocks, is undamaged we have no access. With little hope the local authorities would drain the area we'll have to do it ourselves or turn the massive puddle into an attraction and build a bridge, the Orange Bridge, over Lake Orange leading to the Orange Gallery. We can stock Lake Orange with orange fish, rent orange fishing rods, and and and ... The possibilities are endless.

Okay, my brain is going sour and the problems never cease.

Our Bnei Menashe women have still not come up with a perfect chalah cover. But we're not giving up!

Our website needs a bit of fixing up and we've received so many kind letters and good advice on how to improve the site. Thank you. Our site is www.theorangegallerygk.com

And we need tons of money to put Gush Katif Repairs into action. The men want to call the company KATIFNIK. What do you think of that as a name?

More next week...



OPERATION DIGNITY  NEEDS HELP TO REVITALIZE THE ONCE-PROUD PEOPLE OF GUSH KATIF.

Send your checks earmarked for OPERATION DIGNITY to:

Central Fund for Israel
Rehov Hagoel 13
Efrat 90435
Israel

OR

Central Fund for Israel
980 Sixth Avenue, Third Floor
New York, NY 10018
USA

Rachel Saperstein and her husband Moshe now live in a temporary trailer. They lived in Neve Dekalim, Gush Katif, Gaza, Israel. Rachel Saperstein was a teacher at the Neve Dekalim ulpana and a spokeswoman for the Katif Regional Council. Her book, "Eviction: A Gush Katif Viewpoint", with photos by Moti Sender can be ordered from www.pavilionpress.com.

Moshe Saperstein is a Jerusalem Diarist, one of the group of Israelis who are recording their experiences living in Israel. He lost an arm while fighting in the 1973 Yom Kippur War. He was again wounded in a February 2002 incident when he drove his car into a terrorist who had just shot and killed a young mother traveling in the car in front of him. He writes frequently of his physical and emotional struggles.

To Go To Top

PALESTINIANS UNITED IN WORSHIPPING SADDAM IN DEATH
Posted by Bruce Tuchman, January 1, 2007.

An arab is an arab is an arab...

This is called "Palestinians Embrace Hanged Saddam, Condemn Execution: Palestinians Again Worship Saddam in Death." It was written by Dr. Michael Widlanski, a specialist in Arab politics and communication whose doctorate dealt with the Palestinian broadcast media. He is a former reporter, correspondent and editor, respectively, at The New York Times, The Cox Newspapers-Atlanta Constitution, and The Jerusalem Post. He has also served as a special advisor to Israeli delegations to peace talks in 1991-1992 and as Strategic Affairs Advisor to the Ministry of Public Security, editing secret PLO Archives captured in Jerusalem.

In a bizarre and rare display of unity, Palestinians of all political stripes today (Sunday Dec. 31, 2006) saluted Saddam Hussein, the late Iraqi dictator, while strongly condemning those who carried out his execution yesterday.

"Saddam Hussein has entered history as a symbol of state nationalism [wattaniyya] and Pan-Arab nationalism [qawmiyya].who helped the Palestinian revolution," asserted a communiqué" issued by the Fatah movement of PLO Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. The Fatah statement was read on official Palestinian radio and TV.

"The execution of the former Iraqi president was widely condemned," observed Voice of Palestine radio, the official mouthpiece of the Palestinian Authority headed by Dr. Abbas.

"This is a blow against all that is Arab and all that is Muslim," declared VOP radio anchorwoman Samah Massar.

VOP radio spent several minutes this morning detailing the condemnations of Saddam's hanging Saturday morning, quoting at length from statements by the Islamic terror group Hamas, from the smaller Islamic Jihad, from the Marxist-oriented Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, among others.

"This is a political assassination," declared a statement from Hamas, the Islamic party that controls the majority in the Palestinian legislature.

"This is state terrorism," averred the statement from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a group that pioneered airplane hijackings in the 1960's.

The longest condemnation cited by VOP radio and official PBC television came from the Fatah movement of Abbas himself, a man who is perceived by many Western observers as a "moderate" and whose government has just been given 2,000-4,000 automatic rifles by Israel, Egypt and the United States.

"The Palestinian Liberation Movement-Fatah-condemns the execution of Former President Saddam Hussein," declared VOP radio in its opening headlines Sunday morning.

"It is against international law and international principles," declared the Fatah movement's communiqué".

"This is a betrayal of all that is Arab and Islamic," declared the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the strike force and suicide squad leaders of Fatah, in a separate statement read on Voice of Palestine radio.

Fatah and its late leader Yasser Arafat also applauded Saddam's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and his subsequent missile attacks on Israel, and there were numerous signs that Arafat tried to copy some of Saddam's techniques.

For the last five years, the Palestinian Authority/Fatah movement under Arafat and his successor Mahmoud Abbas and the Hamas and Jihad have developed their own rocket threats, launching hundreds of Qassam rockets at targets in Israel.

For his part, Saddam saw in the Palestinians and their combat a way to demonstrate his Pan-Arab leadership credentials, and he regularly financed the families of Palestinian human bombers who blew themselves up in Israeli stores, hotels and bus stations. The Palestinians never forgot this.

Later this evening, even the regularly scheduled Fatah celebrations of its own anniversary were overtaken by crowd salutes to the dead Iraqi dictator.

"By blood and by spirit, we will redeem you O Palestine," chanted Palestinian crowds holding aloft pictures of Saddam, as they paraded in the rain-swept main square in Gaza Sunday evening.

The pictures were shown live on Abbas's state television outlet, PBC [Palestine Broadcasting Corporation, in a spot where PLO Chairman Abbas was set to address the crowd marking Fatah Day, the anniversary of the first Fatah terror attack on Israel on January 1, 1965: the strike at Israel's National Water Carrier.

The reasons for Palestinian affection for Saddam-from Hamas to Fatah-also seem based on strong areas of agreement: a combination of Qawmiyyah [Pan Arab nationalism] and Pan-Islamic sentiment.

These two principles were basic to Saddam's mass appeal to "the Arab street" as well as to the popularity of one of Saddam's greatest fans, Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian leader who preceded Mahmoud Abbas as head of Fatah, the PLO and the Palestinian Authority.

Contact Bruch Tuchman by email at Bruce@Nycat.org

To Go To Top

ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE DILEMMAS IN LEBANON
Posted by Michael Travis, January 1, 2007.

This assessment of the Second Lebanon was written by Col. David Eshel and it appeared in Defense Update.
(http://www.defense-update.com/weblog.html). For comments please email to: analysis@defense-update.com

In the years since Israel ended its military occupation of southern Lebanon in May 2000, Israel's intelligence community watched warily as Hezbollah built up its military presence in the region. When Hezbollah militants kidnapped two Israeli soldiers on July 12, 2006, the Israeli military was ready to react almost instantly, based on years of extensive intelligence gathering. "Of all of Israel's wars since 1948, this was the one for which Israel was most prepared," said Gerald Steinberg, professor of political science at Bar-Ilan University. "In a sense, the preparation began in May 2000, immediately after the Israeli withdrawal, when it became clear the international community was not going to prevent Hezbollah from stockpiling missiles and attacking Israel".

A perusal of thick and detailed secret dossiers might show how deeply Israeli intelligence was able to penetrate certain levels of Hezbollah's alignments, but also how limited in importance this was in the decisive test of utilizing the secrets. "Hezbollah's Combat Concept" dated January 2006 is a highly restricted 130-page booklet, crammed with data on bunkers and Katyusha rockets and other military installations. Its author is a lieutenant colonel in Military Intelligence (MI), personal aide to MI director and formerly head of the Lebanon section in the intelligence department of Northern Command. The problem was, as is unfortunately so often with top secret documents, in hierarchical organizations, that while all this wealth was readily available, its contents were regarded so restricted, that only a select few were allowed to feast their eyes on its contents. The inevitable result was, as ridiculously as it may sound, that even the commander of 91st Division, which was in charge of the Lebanese border, was not party to such life-saving information before the war started on July 12!

The problem of intelligence gathering capabilities intensified further with the outbreak of war. As is usual in combat situations, the intelligence that is available to the troops before the war, a great deal of which has been built up meticulously over years, goes up in smoke as soon as the troops go into action. The bank of targets that has been prepared diminishes after the first wave of attacks. There is a tactical intelligence difficulty in pinpointing new targets during the fighting, until the forward combat elements actually make contact with the enemy. The conduct of the battle, from there on, depends on tactical intelligence, mostly real-time in nature, as targets come into focus by the advancing troops, in modern warfare, through tactical intelligence elements, such as TUAV, electro-optical observation etc.

Moreover, it is especially difficult to run human agents to provide actual information: Communications with them, even if they are equipped with state-of-the-art devices, usually break down because of a lack of physical contact. This became evident when the ground war started along the border region. Although Israeli intelligence had operated Lebanese human intelligence (HUMINT) agents for years, since the "Security Zone" era, some of which remained active, long after the IDF withdrew in May2000. During the IDF's 18-year presence in Lebanon, the members of the IDF HUMINT unit were especially active across Israel's northern border. To this day the Lebanese press occasionally runs stories about the arrest and trial of local agents who operated in the service of this unit. In November 1998, a Lebanese court convicted no fewer than 57 citizens of collaborating with Israel intelligence. But many of the surviving agents were forced to leave their homes in South Lebanon when the IDF distributed Psychop leaflets calling to evacuate their villages before these came under fire. Lack of HUMINT became critical when the fighting intensified and Hezbollah fighters mingled with the population in the villages, but were difficult to identify from non combatants.

Mossad can certainly high marks for much of the high precision intelligence, which enabled the air attacks to pinpoint Hezbollah medium rocket sites and neutralize most of them during the 48 hours, which saved most of Israel's major towns from these larger rockets. Air force intelligence also performed in clock-work fashion, identifying Hezbollah rocket launchers seconds after firing, which were then destroyed by immediate air attack through "cab-rank" cruising air assets, in the suspected environment. The unique rapid reaction "sensor-to-shooter kill-chain" tactics, similar to performance in the Gaza Strip, paid off handsomely in Lebanon 2006.

IDF Military Intelligence gathering units ( HUMINT) and signal intelligence( SIGINT) were tasked with obtaining vital intelligence on Hezbollah forward deployments in South Lebanon and their work was in high demand by forward troops, during the initial stages of the war. But all this was not sufficient: For example, one place was indeed identified, using satellite photographs, as a Hezbollah bunker, however only from the ground at short range before contact, were special forces able to discover that it served as the entrance to a previously unknown extensive underground network of caves and bunkers stuffed with missiles. On the other hand, precise intelligence allowed IDF special forces to raid Hezbollah strongpoints deep inside Lebanese territory. The successful commando raids into the Beka'a Valley and Tyre, depended on real-time intelligence. In fact, the surprise raid into Baalbek, the most ambitious air and ground operation of the current conflict, had been conducted, based on excellent intelligence, demonstrating that Israeli forces could strike anywhere

A major element in the Second Lebanon War was Hezbollah's professional employment of advanced anti-tank missiles. The very presence of such weapons was no surprise to IDF intelligence. In fact, according to declassified reports, one of these was actually captured ( or obtained) and examined by experts long before the war started. What remained obscure, was the massive deployment and tactical method used by Hezbollah with these weapons, which became a dominant star player during all ground engagements. According to official statistics, anti-tank missiles hit 46 tanks and 14 other armored vehicles. However, fortunately, due to enhanced protection, in all these attacks the Merkava tanks actually sustained only 15 armour penetrations.

Senior Armored Corps officers claimed in media interviews during the war, that the defense establishment had refused to provide tanks with the Trophy, a locally developed active protection system which creates a hemispheric protected zone around armored vehicles, such as the Merkava 4 tank. The system is designed to detect and track a threat and counters it with a launched projectile that intercepts the anti-tank rocket. The reason for such costly oversight, was claimed by the authorities, in the aftermath of the war, as lack of funding due to budget cuts!

In overall perspective it seems, at first sight, that Israel's miscalculation in assessing intelligence information in Lebanon has the same cause as America's miscalculations in Iraq: plain old grade arrogance underestimating the enemy. It is however important to understand that Mossad and the rest of Israel's intelligence apparatus are not all-knowing and all-powerful, despite their past successes, which have created an aura of great strength and invincibility around them. It is clear that Hezbollah has studied and learned more than a few lessons itself over the years. Members of its military wing, for example, are far less publicly visible and, by implication, identifiable, than members of Fatah's militia, which the IDF has been to hunt and target with a highly successful "kill chain" apparatus.

The war in Lebanon may have begun with a string of intelligence failures resulting from the fact that Israel had lowered its alert level on the northern border prior to the Hezbollah raid.

But not all was lost. Last July, the war wiped out most of the vast sum of $4-6 billion the Iranian treasury sunk into building Hezbollah's military strength. The organization was meant to be strong and effective enough to provide Iran with a formidable deterrent to Israel or the United States embarking on a military operation to destroy the Islamic regime's nuclear infrastructure. Iran has now been manipulatively robbed of its primary deterrent asset ahead of a probable nuclear confrontation with the United States and Israel. Hezbollah, on Hassan Nasrallah's hasty orders, squandered thousands of rockets -- either by firing them into Israel or having them destroyed by the Israeli air force. This at least, may have been worth the effort by Israel.

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

THE TRIAL OF SHIMSHON CYTRYN: WHAT HAS BECOME OF ISRAEL'S JUSTICE?
Posted by Janet Lehr, January 1, 2007.

Some of you know of the trial of Shimshon Cytryn, the young man accused of 'lynching' a Muasi Arab (an Arab from the Al-Muasi refugee camp in Gaza), in Gush Katif, two weeks before the disengagement, the summer of 2005. He is being relentlessly charged with attempted murder, though the Arab was seen walking about after the film crew capped their lenses.

As the Israeli government prepared to take over the Maoz Yam Hotel, a property on the Mediterranean in Gush Katif, that they hoped to make their operations headquarters in the coming disengagement, the 'lynching' reported by Ha'aretz, occurred. Eventually, the army swooped down on Maoz Yam (the seaside fortress) and violently removed disengagement protesters, not to protect them from Arabs from the Al Muasi refugee camp who had been throwing rocks at these teenage Jews for two days. The 'lynching' was used to justify the army's strong arm tactics in violently removing teenage demonstrators from Maoz Yam. Eye-witness reports show that the 'lynching' was a photo-op used to stir hatred of the disengagement protesters, and in fact Ha'aretz file a correction several days later. Shimshon Cytryn's trial began in Beersheva Aug 2, 2006 and resumes on February 15th, 2007.

A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE FACTS

On July 27 and 28, 2005, Arab terrorists attacked Jewish residents and protestors at the Mooz Yam Hotel in Gush Katif with rocks. Several Jews were struck and badly wounded by the rock throwing. Their friends attempted to fight back and apprehend the Arab attackers. By the time IDFsoldiers arrived on the scene to restore security, the Jews had managed to detain several of the Arab terrorists and were demanding that the soldiers place them under arrest.

Instead, the IDF soldiers decided to simply separate the two groups and allow the Arab rock throwers to escape. One witness said that in the course of the incident, "about 30 Arabs came out and started pounding everything in sight with rocks. It was a terrible disgrace for the IDF... The soldiers were simply unable to protect themselves from this onslaught, even though the Arabs were pounding the jeeps and everything."

The 'setup' frequently fed to the world by pro-palestinian media during the Intifada, like the 'setup' of Al Dura or of the 'massacre of Jenin', was in play on July 28th. It was deliberate and premeditated. According to an eye-witness, reporters instructed the Arab to lie down and pretend that he was unconscious. Israeli television stations showed footage of an Arab -- Halil Majeida -- lying on the ground and then two Jewish boys running towards him and throwing rocks at him. It is alleged that one of these boys is Shimshon Cytryn, an 18-year-old yeshiva student, The State has accused him of attempted murder.

But, according to an eye-witness, "That's not the story! I saw this same Arab get hit in the head with a rock -- and yet he continued to throw rocks, like a tiger, for the next 15 minutes! And then I saw some reporters go over to him and tell him to lie down and act as if he was unconscious. Later on, he was taken out walking on his own, holding on to a soldier; all this talk of his being mortally wounded is total nonsense."

Shortly after Shimshon's arrest, the truth of the matter started to be brought to light. It was revealed that Majeida was no innocent bystander, but rather he was an active participant in the rock-throwing attack on Jewish residents. Photos of Majeida hurling stones at innocent Jews were published on the internet. Even the left-of-center daily newspaper Ha'aretz realized its initial mistake and grudgingly published a retraction:

"Contrary to initial reports, Majeida was not seriously or critically wounded, but sustained only light injuries. He was sent home after receiving treatment, and even gave interviews to a number of media outlets a few days after the lynching attempt. In the interviews, Majeida said that most of the injuries he sustained were caused by Israel Defense Forces soldiers prior to the lynching attempt. Majeida also declared his desire to be a shaheed (suicide martyr)."

Yet the Israeli State Attorney's Office is pushing on with its prosecution of Shimshon for attempted murder.

THE LYNCH AGAINST THE MAOZ YAM HOTEL
By Nadia Matar, Executive Committee of Kela Authority
http://www.geocities.com/cytryn6000/matar.html

Everyone I meet asks me: "What really happened in the Maoz Yam hotel?" First, let's start with the good news: the deportation operation at the hotel proved to all the world that we have the ability to prevent the implementation of Sharon's deportation plan, if we only organize accordingly. If it is necessary to bring so many policemen and soldiers in order to remove fewer than a hundred people, the majority of whom were youth, women, and infants who did not resist, then on D-Day, when, with G-d's help, there will be tens of thousands of resolute individuals in Gush Katif and Samaria, the deportation forces simply will not be able to carry out their evil design.

When the Kela Authority (Gaza Absorption Authority), headed by Datia Yitzhaki, asked the hotel owners for permission to renovate the abandoned and rundown hotel, and fill it with new residents, as part of the renovation and populating of the abandoned houses throughout the Gush by Kela, the owners responded enthusiastically. The Ve-Yorashtem Otah ("And occupy it") association of Baruch Marzel and myself, representing the Kela Authority, received power of attorney, and were authorized for everything connected with the populating, renovation, and operation of the hotel. The conditions in the hotel were very difficult. In the first month, brave families from Samaria and Hebron lived there, together with young volunteers, without electricity and with only a bit of cold water. The Kela Authority was in charge of everything connected with the renovations, and the Ve-Yorashtem Otah association made all the arrangements for food. More and more families and singles slowly arrived from different parts of the country and learned to live together as a cohesive community.

We were aware from the beginning that the security forces planned to take over the hotel, in order to situate the deportation forces in such a strategic position (in the middle of Gush Katif, with access to the sea). They offered a fortune to the hotel owners if they would agree to lease the hotel to them. The courageous hotel owners, however, preferred to lease it to those faithful to Eretz Israel, and not to the deportation forces. The legal settlement in the hotel upset all the government's plans. Not only could they not position their headquarters there, the place was turned into a concentration of the determined opponents of the Sharon plan. The deportation forces understood that, legally, they had no possibility of expelling us from there. They were left with only a single way: initiating provocations and a campaign of delegitimation against the inhabitants of the hotel, in the hope that the latter would provide them with a pretext to take over the hotel, before anyone realized what was happening, and by force.

And the provocations came. This began motzei Shabbat (Saturday night) two weeks ago, when the people of Israel heard on the radio that "extreme right-wing activists from Maoz Yam attacked Arabs from Muassi and injured them." An examination proved that the opposite was the case. A group of about ten Jews, guests for Shabbat, was walking in the direction of Shirat Hayam. On the way they were attacked by dozens of Arabs with clubs and stones. The scoop was that "a person bit an attacking Rottweiler" -- the Jews defended themselves and chased away the attacking Arabs. The way that the incident was presented in the media, as if it were the Jews who had attacked the Arabs, and not the opposite, was done with the clear aim of besmirching the inhabitants of the hotel.

And that was only the beginning. Every day people heard all kinds of strange reports from the hotel until the impression was gained that its inhabitants were really dangerous. The tours that we gave the media -- to show them that we were busy with the new kindergarten, the kitchen, the establishment of the study hall, and the wine and cheese evening to connect with the residents of Gush Katif -- were all to no avail. According to the reports in the media, Maoz Yam had become the Number One danger in the State of Israel. Screaming headlines in the newspapers spoke of the "Masada of Gush Katif," without there being any basis in reality for this. Anyone who read the newspapers and heard the news could think that we were preparing biological and chemical weapons in Maoz Yam, if not an atomic bomb.

And then came the provocation that led to the storming of the hotel. The army destroyed dozens of abandoned houses close to the settlement of Shirat Hayam. The pretext for the destruction was that the security forces "feared that the Jews would take over these houses and fill them with opponents of the disengagement." This happened, of all days, on the day of the funeral of the two youths from the southern Hebron hill country who were murdered by Arab terrorists. Instead of the army demolishing the houses of the Arab terrorists who murdered these youths, or going in pursuit of the launchers of Kassam rockets, the Sharon government sent the army to engage in a provocation against the national camp, knowing that such a hillul Hashem (desecration of the Name of G-d) would not pass without a response, and that Jews would return to the location to try and rebuild the ruins.

Thus began the story of Tal Yam. That very night the activists in the field decided to rebuild the ruins of the abandoned structures and call the site "Tal Yam," in memory of Tali Hatuel, may the Lord avenge her. The youth preferred to take over an abandoned house in the 'Muassi', at a distance of a few hundred meters from there.

When the Arabs in the next house organized for a pogrom against the Jews, began to throw rocks at Jewish girls walking on the road, and even injured one in the forehead (did anyone broadcast the pictures of the injured Jewish girl?), the army was supposed to intervene, to restore order, and even to remove the Arabs from there in order to protect the lives of the Jews. But because the authorities wanted the situation there to deteriorate, the army stood by and did nothing. The youth responded as any true Jew is supposed to respond in such a situation: they defended themselves. Perhaps too enthusiastically, but this was still self-defense. But we heard in the media that "lawbreaking Jews are throwing rocks at the poor Arabs."

The delegitimation campaign reached its peak on the day of the "lynch." All the media broadcast pictures of Jewish youth presumably attacking a poor Arab youth. Today -- after the publication of the full picture on the Internet -- it is common knowledge that there was no lynch, and that the "poor Arab youth" was an eighteen-year-old Arab who endangered the lives of the Jews there by the wild throwing of rocks. The Arab attacker himself admitted in an interview with Israel Radio's Avi Yisakharov that he was hit in the head by the butt of a soldier's rifle. This soldier (who acted in this manner in order to stop the Arab attacker, who was said to be holding a knife) also hit him in the ribs and the face. This was his main injury, and only afterwards were stones thrown at him, that caused the secondary injury. Several hours after he was listed as "critically injured," he was already seen standing and laughing with his friends, and he had miraculously become very lightly wounded.

Real "lynches" did occur during those same days, in other places: activists of the extreme left who demonstrated against the fence injured a soldier, and took out his eye; police in Ramat Gan brutally beat an innocent demonstrator and barbarously tortured him by putting their fingers in his nostrils and pulling his head backwards, when his hands were tied, and other such instances. It is clear why these events received no media coverage.

The staged pictures from the "lynch" at Tal Yam served their purpose, and were the pretext for the storming of the Maoz Yam hotel. No one bothered to ask how the total mess at Tal Yam provided the sanction for the storming of Maoz Yam, two kilometers away, but this is a marginal question. What troubles me is that the national camp leadership, in and outside Gush Katif, fell into the "divide and rule" trap that Ariel Sharon set for us, believed the smear and delegitimation campaign, and instead of coming to the aid of Maoz Yam, engaged in their favorite sport: breast-beating and condemnations, and allowed the authorities to illegally occupy Maoz Yam. This must not happen again. It is obvious that in a few weeks the Sharon dictatorship will organize for all of Gush Katif a delegitimation campaign similar to what they did to Maoz Yam. Who knows what the dark minds in the GSS are preparing for us? Will some GSS operative disguised as a Gush Katif settler shoot, Heaven forbid, some government minister or a soldier? Will a GSS operative disguised as a settler from Gush Katif try to carry out some attack on the Temple Mount? It's difficult to know, but the delegitimation campaign against Gush Katif is on the way.

As regards Tal Yam and Maoz Yam, engaging in charges and accusations within our camp is pointless now. We all made mistakes. Yes, we, too. But it is important to understand that even if Tal Yam had never existed, and the inhabitants of Maoz Yam were all moderate and mild-mannered families, then, too, the authorities would have arranged provocations in order to defame the inhabitants and storm the hotel -- first, because the strategic location is important for them; and second, they do not want a concentration of Eretz Israel loyalists in Gush Katif who are infused with the faith in our ability to cancel the decree.

[ULTIMATELY THE DEFENDERS OF GUSH KATIF WERE PREVENTED FROM BRINGING SUPPORTERS INTO THE AREA BY THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT EMPLOYING A 4.5:1 RATIO OF GOVERNMENT FORCES AGAINST THE DEFENDERS OF GUSH KATIF AND IMPEDING THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT ISRAEL]

And here we come back to the good news: the expulsion operation at the hotel proved to all of us that it is not at all simple to remove people from their homes. If the army had to bring thousands of soldiers to expel about a hundred people, most of whom were women and children, then the solution for our victory lies in numbers. Our power is in our numbers. Now we must concentrate on bringing tens of thousands of people to Gush Katif and Samaria. During the uprooting of Yamit, the heads of the army told Rabbi Neriah, of blessed memory: If only you could bring an additional 20,000 people here, we could inform the government that we are incapable of implementing our task. Therefore, Gush Katif must prepare for the absorption of masses of people. Every family in Gush Katif must engage in a "family doubling operation": setting up tents and huts on their individual lawns and host for the entire summer the grandfather and grandmother from Rehovot, the cousins from Petah Tikvah, the grandchildren from Kfar Maimon, the cousins from Ofakim, and the good friends from Tel Aviv and Raananah. The tens of thousands of other people who don't have relatives in Gush Katif will camp out in the public areas: the beaches, the schools, the community centers, and the like. It's true that it's not the most pleasant thing to break our daily routine. But what is preferable? To break out of our routine for a few weeks in order to save home and life, or to live our routine lives until August 15, and then to lose everything?

As in every dictatorship, the security forces seem very intimidating. But the truth is that this government fears us. It tries in every way to break our spirit, because they know that if we only organize properly, we have the ability to triumph. And so, now is the time to continue to act, with even greater energy, in the four areas that, with G-d's help, will bring victory:

* strengthening the inhabitants of Gush Katif, so that they will continue to plant and be steadfast, and not agree to sign to accept compensation.
* to continue to call upon soldiers not to obey the illegal and immoral deportation order: the tens of thousands of soldiers who will remove their uniforms on D-Day and join the residents of Gush Katif will, with G-d's help, be the surprise of the summer.
* to strengthen and encourage the youthful roadblockers, who will insure a total system breakdown in the country on D-Day.
* to organize to absorb the masses in Gush Katif and Samaria.

We will work together, we will organize, and, with G-d's help, we will prevail. On August 16, when the Prime Minister will announce, to the entire world, his resignation and the cancellation of the deportation plan, the entire people of Israel are invited to a festive meal of thanksgiving to the Holy One, blessed be He, in the Maoz Yam hotel.


The costs involved of defending Shimshon and proving his innocence, are enormous. Moreover, the Israeli State's Attorneys office, with its unlimited financial resources, will stop at nothing to win a conviction and send this teenager to prison for many long years. A legal defense fund has been established to financially assist the Cytryn Family in proving Shimshon's innocence.

Shimshon's grandmother, Marilyn Cytryn, was a Virginian who made aliya several years ago. You can share her pain with her in English amcytryn@netvision.net.il

U.S. tax deductible donations can be made out to the Central Fund of Israel and mailed to:
Shmuel HaCohen Cytryn cytryn6000@yahoo.com
Yishuv Nachliel
Doar Na Modiin
Israel 71938

Those wishing to make a direct deposit in shekels, may do so:
Bank Discount -- Main Branch
Branch 160 -- Ben Yehuda, Jerusalem
Accout of HaCohen Cytryn
Account # 921157

Shimshon Cytryn's case needs public exposure NOW. Don't be shy. Write the Knesset membership and Jewish Presses and some of the dynamic US media. If you've a more extensive media list, particularly talk show hosts and columnists, please use it and send it to me at janetlehr@veredart.com.

MEDIA

wolf@cnn.com; ombud@globe.com; suggestions@lauraingraham.com; hardball@msnbc.com; joe@msnbc.com; atc@npr.org; countdown@msnbc.com; abramsreport@msnbc.com; opinion@msnbc.com; beltway@foxnews.com; foxreport@foxnews.com; oreilly@foxnews.com; info@creators.com; comments@foxnews.com; hannity@foxnews.com; Speakout@foxnews.com; Viewerservices@foxnews.com; live@foxnews.com; foxnewsonline@foxnews.com ; askfox@foxinc.com ; Viewerservices@foxnews.com ; hannity@foxnew.om ; special@foxnews.com; Afterhours@foxnews.com ; COLMES@FOXNEWS.COM;Atlarge@foxnews.com ; Bullsandbears@foxnews.com ; Cash@foxnews.com ; Friends@foxnews.com ; Comments@foxnews.com; Special@foxnews.com;Feedback@foxnews.com ; Newswatch@foxnews.com ; lateedition@cnn.com; cjr@columbia.edu; onthemedia@wnyc.org; newswatch@foxnews.com ; Reliable@CNN.com; kurtzh@washpost.com; letter@globe.com; editors@interactive.wsj.com; Nightline@abcnews.com; Al-alwada-news@yahoogroups.com; Jsmith@globe.com; Kwadington@suntimes.com; Alipinski@tribune.com; Cmcmahon@tribune.com; Dclifton@plaind.com; Cnn@cnn.com; Cjr@columbia.edu; Editorial@jewishledger.com; Mconnolly@newstimes.com; Rush@eibnet.com; Letters@star-telegram.com; bret@jpost.com; caroline@jpost.com; Letters@courant.com; Cbglick@zahav.net.il; John.carroll@latimes.com; Marjorie.miller@latimes.com; worldnews@herald.com; Mefnews@meforum.org; Editor@newbritainherald.com; Letters@nhregister.com; Editor@theday.com; Editors@newsweek.com; Newsdesk@nysun.com; Editor@nysun.com; jgershman@nysun.com; crosett@nysun.com; elake@nysun.com; bavni@nysun.com;Foreign@nytimes.com; Public@nytimes.com; editor@orlandosentinel.com; editor@phillynews.com; Foreign@phillynews.com; Nragen@netmedia.net.il; janetlehr@mindspring.com; Msill@newsobserver.com; Oquarles@newsobserver.com; Letters@sun-sentinel.com; David.smith@uniontrib.com; readerrep@sfchronicle.com; Eletters@starledger.com; Editor@think-israel.org; James_kelly@timemagazine.com; Etinsley@usatoday.com; Letters@usnews.com; Foreign@washpost.com; Westhartfordnews@ctcentral.com; Onthemedia@wnyc.org; alankeyes@RENEWAMERICA.US; alison.sharman@bbc.co.uk; vaadharabbonim@yahoo.com; AmericanRedCross@ProcessRequest.com; amnestyis@amnesty.org; ai-news@amnesty.org; admin-us@aiusa.org; info@prescon.org; mailing@norpac.net; andrew.steele@bbc.co.uk; barry.langridge@bbc.co.uk; public.info@consilium.eu.int; christopher.patten@cec.eu.int; info@cre.gov.uk; sg-plaintes@cec.eu.int; letters@haaretz.co.il; maariv@newmail.net; editor@maariv.co.il; releases@jewishpress.com; focus@yetioth.co.il; mac@haaretz.co.il; mail@thelikud.org; editlett@jewishaz.com; editor@reuters.com; media@actcom.co.il;

KNESSET MEMBERS

nslomianski@knesset.gov.il; avrahamsh@knesset.gov.il; oritn@knesset.gov.il; ylitzman@knesset.gov.il; hkatz@knesset.gov.il; akara@knesset.gov.il; iherzog@knesset.gov.il; mgorlovski@knesset.gov.il; belon@knesset.gov.il; ndahan@knesset.gov.il; izchakec@knesset.gov.il; rbrison@knesset.gov.il; dbenlulu@knesset.gov.il; avilan@knesset.gov.il; mnahari@knesset.gov.il; yhazan@knesset.gov.il; gfinkelshtein@knesset.gov.il; eichler@knesset.gov.il; egavrieli@knesset.gov.il; zhanegbi@knesset.gov.il; yiskatz@knesset.gov.il; llivnat@knesset.gov.il; dnaveh@knesset.gov.il; bnetanyahoo@knesset.gov.il; ysteinitz@knesset.gov.il; sshalom@knesset.gov.il; davidt@knesset.gov.il; ndoron@knesset.gov.il; iyasinov@knesset.gov.il; vbrailovsky@knesset.gov.il; ulandau@knesset.gov.il; natan@aliya.org.il; uria@KNESSET.GOV.IL; sar@moag.gov.il; pm_eng@pmo.gov.il; mkatsav@knesset.gov.il; sar@mof.gov.il; sar@mfa.gov.il; sar@molsa.gov.il; sar@moch.gov.il; sar@tourism.gov.il; sar@mops.gov.il; minister@most.gov.il; sar@moag.gov.il; sar@moia.gov.il; sar@education.gov.il; sar@mot.gov.il; sar@mod.gov.il; sar@matat.health.gov.il; sars@int.gov.il; marens@knesset.gov.il;

JEWISH PRESS

MCALLENDER@BRONXMEDIA.COM; ctigay@jta.org; markh@aflwebprinting.com; JewishStd@aol.com; JewishStd2@aol.com; jwishtimes@aol.com; asilowcarroll@njjewishnews.com; sitzkowitz@njjewishnews.com; mleitzes@njjewishnews.com; editorial@njjewishnews.com; ad@njjewishnews.com; hkessler@jfedsnj.org; rkeats1@aol.com; levanab@aol.com; Rcumins@aol.com; Eema1957@aol.com; friedmanj@aol.com; EBKAHN@aol.com; robinl@optonline.net; Helem407@aol.com; achim@uahc.org; shafran@amechad.com; rwolf@shaare-zedek.org; Info@jdcny.org; martha@ats.org; adlmedia@adl.org; miriam@jcca.org; Hillary.Kessler-Godin@claimscon.org; sstein@elalusa.com; Goldberg@forward.com; relliott@hadassah.org; atigay@aol.com; publisher@hamodia.com; jtaNY@aol.com; ja@ou.org; niv@advn.com; sshtull@jhom.com; jholiday@optonline.net; communications@jnf.org; lilithmag@aol.com; Judith@naamat.org; mailbox@ncjw.org; NFJC@jewishculture.org; NFJC@jewishculture.org; nmarketing@optonline.net; steiners@ou.org; editor@thegolem.com; paz@golem.tv; jpeditor@aol.com; editor@jewishweek.org; rich@jewishweek.org; news@jewishworldnews.org; TReporter@aol.com; JOCNY@aol.com; dasher@waort.org; rockujarep@aol.com; glenn.rosenkrantz@ujc.org; info@uscj.org; EGrotta@urj.org; nmargolis@wjchronicle.com; editor@wjchronicle.com; OutlookRJK@aol.com; OutlookRJK@aol.com; civiamclean@juno.com; Kaplan@wexner.org ; Rachel@JewishMatch.com; ferrara@ymail.yu.edu; hshulman@ymail.yu.edu; seb17@aol.com; conbenesch@aol.com; Chanbillet@hotmail.com; imB@15MinutesMagazine.com; mjjordan23@earthlink.net; esther.kustanowitz@gmail.com; marcuspr@nyc.rr.com; Marthamend@aol.com; Anne.Pinzow@jewishfocus.com; mollyres@aol.com; hzs8@aol.com; JBSwriter@aol.com; teklaszymanski@hotmail.com; mweinberg@distinguishedtourist.com; paula_maggio@jewishakron.org; rcertner@cjn.org; cdettelbach@cjn.org; jwoomer@cjn.org; jdery@cjn.org; editorial@cjn.org; admin@cjn.org; publisher@insight.rr.com; ojc@insight.rr.com; MWeiss@JFGD.net ; MWeiss@JFGD.net ; info@thenewstandard.com; meira@jewishtoledo.org; fshwriter@aol.com; leke0212@aol.com; paul@jewishreview.org; cross@commnewspapers.com; msimon@bartash.com; communityreview@desupernet.net; Carolyn@jflv.org; news@pittchron.com; jexponent@aol.com; rfsugarman@juno.com; achanin@aol.com; donnadvorak@comcast.net; mfrentrop@earthlink.net; ethelhof@aol.com; bonnie.squires@verizon.net; JRubin@JFRI.ORG; mediabuy@aol.com; LEAHLFC@aol.com; hebwat@aol.com; judy@jewishnashville.org; carrie@jewishnashville.org; editor@jhvonline.com; markjfsa@aol.com; news@texasjewishpost.com; nancyrg@sbcglobal.net; news@ujft.org; editor@jtnews.net ; donna@ghostwriteronline.com ; MilwaukeeJ@aol.com; editor@deepsouthjewishvoice.com; te11d@hiwaay.net; publisher@jewishaz.com; amyleder@aol.com; marc@jweekly.com; nora@jweekly.com; info@jweekly.com; jchron@surfside.net; jcn@jfgsj.org; editor@jewishjournal.com; bsomers@mff.org; jmschwarz@sdjewishtimes.com; msirota@sdjewishtimes.com; editor@sdjewishjournal.com; avra@wiesenthal.com; magazine@tikkun.org ; SFish1998@aol.com; steve@greenberg-art.com ; aprubin@earthlink.net; prannabelle@aol.com; tomtu@pacbell.net; Julman77@hotmail.com; mbd@cjnews.com; jewishfp@telus.net; editor@jewishbulletin.ca; email@ijn.com; editorial@jewishledger.com; mperl@sbcglobal.net; mperl@sbcglobal.net; tracysullivan@jewishledger.com; howardblas@hotmail.com; lynn.edelman@shalomdel.org ; ijm@bnaibrith.org; astrunk@bbyo.org; jerubin@hillel.org; jwi@jwi.org; editor@momentmag.com; rneedler@aipac.org; mail@rabinowitz.com; info@religionnews.com ; info@religionnews.com ; jcolbert@jinsa.org; cwaldman@jwv.org; aberger@ushmm.org ; wjweek@aol.com; sivanR@aol.com; leslie@somethingjewish.co.uk; heritagefl@aol.com; jmoed@tribune.com; jewishpress@aol.com; slevene@atljewishtimes.com; jgreen@atljewishtimes.com; editor@jewsweek.com; info@chicagojewishnews.com; chicagojewishstar@comcast.net; jufnews@juf.org; Magendavidadom@hotmail.com; silfed@simokyfed.com; rebecca@worldjewishdigest.com.com; radiogumbo@aol.com; gwinston@interaccess.com; mediaconf@jazo.org.il; STLOUISLGT@aol.com ; nancy@netvision.net.il; media@actcom.co.il; Lspltd@012.net.il; ruth@ruthfrank.com; Liat-r@jerusalem-foundation.org; spearson@shalem.org.il; mediaconf@jazo.org.il ; dardasht@barak-online.net; smile@goldenlightimages.com; info@impmedia.co.il; meyers@netvision.net.il; esterly613@hotmail.com; apsinger@netvision.net.il; rhellman@sunpublications.com; jfed@iglou.com; mjackman@mjfreelancer.com; jewishnews@jewishnola.com; margolis@maine.rr.com; michael@babaganewz.com; CEO@jflmedia.com; mark@babaganewz.com; Sue@babaganewz.com; information@jewishtimes.com; shalom@shalomusaradio.com; claradan@aol.com ; irifkin@verizon.net ; CEO@jflmedia.com; sberrin@jflmedia.com; pt@bikher.org; editorial@thejewishadvocate.com; publisher@jewishjournal.org; YosefA@aol.com; rsklar@thejewishnews.com; WJNA2@aol.com; mordecaisp@aol.com ; dsugerman@attbi.com ; gfelsen@mspcommunications.com ; Loumur70@aol.com; apolin@stllight.org; stlouislight@stllight.org; ckatzman@jewishomaha.org; ozmom@cox.net; caorzes@cox.net; lvjewishreporter@aol.com; caorzes@cox.net;

Janet Lehr is editor/publisher of a daily e-mail called "Israel Lives." She can be contacted at israellives@veredart.com

To Go To Top

LONDONER ASSAULTED BY MUSLIM, TOLD TO SWALLOW IT BY POLICE
Posted by Aryeh Zelasko, January 1, 2007.

England, the home of parliamentary democracy, the rule of law, civility and poetry, all but gone, succumbing to Islam via multiculturalism. Shakespeare, Blackstone, Milton, Newton, and Matthew Arnold: "The Sea of Faith/Was once, too, full ... But now I only hear/Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar ..."

Wake up America! Your tolerance, your liberalism, your exaltation of pluralism and humanism are obsolete. To win the war against the most ruthless of enemies, you will have to be ruthless yourself. Unlike you, the enemy does not believe in the sanctity of human life: he uses women and children as human bombs to kill you. And with each leniency and retreat on your part, his so-called moderate co-religionists will join him. Now, given an enemy that pursues his global and totalitarian objective in the name of a monotheistic religion, can you muster the ruthlessness you exhibited in your war against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan?

Ponder this from England that is recorded at
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/014639.php


Yes, of course, Moslems are an alien body in our midst. Every day in London -- on the tube, in shops, in parks, whilst shopping, whilst going about the 101 tasks that make up an average life -- this is borne in on me.

In London today Moslems dress differently, are rude to locals, jump queues, shout at us, wave their fists at us, call us 'worthless infidel' in public and in loud voices. I have, just four days ago, been elbowed aside by a moslem couple, with sidekicks, whilst trying to top up my Oyster card at a tube station at the automatic machine. Apparently, I had taken longer than the ten seconds that they were prepared to wait and so three burly males forced me aside and, when I objected, pushed me to the floor and -- quite literally -- and took over the machine which I was attempting to use.

Not, in a crowded and impatient city like London that this was a surprise, but that in this instance that I was insulted by these people was a surprise. The eldest male in the group, dressed in the usual and ridiculous garb of mohammedans everywhere, looked directly at me amd said, in quite clear English, (and I quote verbatim) "Get out of our way infidel slave".

You may imagine how I felt at that moment. To be so insulted in my own capital city was stunning. It took all my self-control not to do something rash at that moment.

Knowing that CCTV cameras would have captured this incident I complained, some three hours later (after having completed my journey and return), to the British Transport Police on the Broadway. I need not have bothered. Not only would no-one there take my complaint of 'technical assault and insult' seriously but no-one to whom I spoke was even prepared to initiate any paperwork whatsoever nor were they remotely prepared to find and look at the video recordings. Indeed, one Officer even said to me that I 'should swallow my pride' and live with it because -- and, once again, I quote verbatim 'you are just being racist and you have to remember that it's cultural with them'.

Obviously, at this point, I indicated that I felt that I had been physically assaulted and that I would really like to have my complaint investigated. Well, this is really where everything about that evening begins to stick in my craw. When I said that, the Officer of the BTP who was listening to me actually cautioned me and warned me that if I persisted with making a nuisance of myself I would be charged under the The Race Relations Act 1976 and the RRAA (Race Relations (Amendment) Act) 2000.

I gave up at this point. Cowardice is sometimes the better part of valour. But, damn it, they won, didn't they? I have been intimidated into a dhimmi position by them and the very powers which should have protected me in my own country.

"Happy New Year everyone", I say in a bitter tone of voice.

Dominic.
(Posted by: necessitasnonhabetlegem at December 31, 2006)

Aryeh Zelasko lives in Beitar Illit, south of Jerusalem. He is Director of Sales and Marketing of Israel Visit (www.israelvisit.co.il) which provides information and an internet buying facility for American visitors to Israel.

To Go To Top

THE BAKER REPORT -- D.O.A.
Posted by Emanuel and Gail Winston, January 1, 2007.

As always, Morrie Amitay knows his subject from his many years of in depth leadership as former Executive Director of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) when AIPAC was truly a grass-roots organization and had 5 special men leading America's prime lobby group for Israel. Morrie Amitay is probably the best expert in Washington today to describe James Baker and his Iraq Study Group report. Let's us hope that the current President and his Administration read it. Please feel free to forward this report to your Congresspeople plus your local and national Media, as well as other influentials.

The recommendations of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) have been justifiably derided by many experts more eloquent than myself. But one adjective used to describe this shoddy effort that stood out for me was fatuous, defined by Webster's as foolishly stupid.

Actually, the portions dealing with the region go beyond foolish stupidity and could be viewed as being closer to appeasement of sworn enemies of the U.S., and indicating malice toward Israel. The Report could also serve as an example of Churchill's definition of a second marriage -- "the triumph of hope over experience". Or, as one pundit put it "the victory of assertion over analysis". Surely our experience with Iran and Syria should have taught us what a fool's game it must be to rely on one's enemy to save you. Under the heading "Throw the Iraq Report in the Trash" Max Boot aptly described it as "an anticlimactic combination of banalities, leavened with generous dollops of wishful thinking," he was being too kind.

Then again, what should we have expected from a group clearly dominated by James Baker, assisted by his trusted lieutenant and former ambassador to Syria, Ed Djerejian -- and staffed by a collection of "experts" many of whom are charitably known as "Arabists". Among them were such notable "lovers of Zion" as Charles Freeman, Bill Quandt, and Shibley Telhami -- a host of lesser-known lights whose biases are a matter of record. With such a combination of Neville Chamberlain look-alikes and "blame Israel first" adherents, their assertion that settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (on Arab terms) would help solve our problems in Iraq was predetermined. Did they really believe that Sunnis and Shi'ites there would stop killing each other if the Palestinians had a state of their own?

Thankfully, the ISG's other basic premise, that Syria and Iran could somehow be induced to help us out of our predicament sufficiently strained the credulity of a host of commentators. Instead of being punished for their subversion of neighboring states, Iran and Syria were to be rewarded by the legitimization of their terrorist-aiding regimes.

There is certainly something wrong with this picture unless you adhere to the "stability uber alles" line peddled by the so-called "realists". Is it really believable that the U.S. and Iran have common interests in Iraq -- or anywhere else for that matter? How realistic is it that the Report's call on Israel for immediate negotiations with a terrorist-supporting regime like Syria could lead to the return of the strategically vital Golan Heights? And even assuming the Israelis agreed to it -- what could Syria actually do to help us in Iraq? For friends of Israel this recommendation was what rankled most since it demonstrated an utter disregard for Israel's security. Essentially it represents a betrayal of a reliable, democratic ally, in order to curry favor with a foe of both Israel and the United States. By calling on Israel to return the Golan Heights, Baker revealed the depths to which he has sunk in his insensitivity to the welfare of the Jewish State.

A disturbing aspect of Baker's primacy in creating this Report is his long-standing relationships with the Saudis, including lucrative financial ties. But conceding the point that Baker isn't in it for the money -- of which he has plenty -- what could be his motivation? It is easy to imagine that he always considered himself much smarter than the Presidents he advised. This is underscored by his insistence that, since all the issues in the ISG Report are "inextricably linked", all of the Report's 79 recommendations must be implemented as a whole. The arrogance displayed here can be matched only by the size of Baker's ego, and the naiveté and lack of expertise of almost all of his fellow commissioners who dutifully attached their names (and reputations) to the more egregarious portions of the Report.

Animus toward Israel aside, Baker has not only lived up to his reputation as a cynical wheeler-dealer, but has undermined fundamental American policy to bring greater freedom and democracy to a region where both are sorely lacking. Baker obviously has no use for the principles and goals enunciated by President Bush, or cares one whit for the millions of Muslims ruled by ruthless dictators. To its credit, the Administration appears to be shying away from the engagement with Iran and Syria that the report advocates.

If Israel's supporters were to select their own "axis of evil," here in our own country, I suspect James A. Baker would receive a fair number of nominations. Baker's name will always be associated with his infamous statement at a Bush I cabinet meeting -- "F--- the Jews, they don't vote for us anyway."

Fortunately, we as Americans can proudly state "F--- Jim Baker, we didn't vote for him anyway".

http://amfac.net/amit122206.html

To Go To Top

PRAYER IN VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL. MUSLIM PRAYER, OF COURSE. PRAYED BY NON-MUSLIMS
Posted by Michael Travis, January 1, 2007.

We are in very serious trouble!

On 1/1/07, Jeff Epstein (jepstein02@snet.net) wrote:

What a wonderful idea! They should also consider a truly enlightening course on Nazism and the Third Reich. The students can wear swastikas, recite verses from Mein Kampf and cremate Jewish effigies for homework assignments.

This article was posted on Dhimmi Watch by Robert Spencer, December 31, 2006
(www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/014630.php). Some of the comments posted on Jihad Watch are reprinted.

"Not only will he learn about the culture by wearing traditional Muslim clothing and praying five times a day, but 'Also going without pork for 30 days, that's going to be rough but we'll make do,' said Morris." In a public school. Imagine the outcry if the teacher were having his students dress as monks and pray Christian prayers. But we all know, of course, that Christian prayer is not allowed in American public schools. Muslim prayer, obviously, is another story: I was an expert witness a few years ago on a case in California that challenged exercises such as these. We lost.

"Living as Muslim," by Kelly Creswell for WHSV.com, with thanks to Cindy:

The Spotswood High School students are researching the Muslim culture and finding out how much no one really knows about this culture that is sometimes is negatively stereotyped by the public.

"What's the first thing that comes to your mind when I say Islam?" said Casey Morris.

"Iraq," a fellow student replied.

That's what Casey Morris hopes to eliminate through his research project, the stereotypes the public has about Muslims. Not only will he learn about the culture by wearing traditional Muslim clothing and praying five times a day, but "Also going without pork for 30 days, that's going to be rough but we'll make do," said Morris.

Morris says he is prepared for the criticism that comes along with it.

"Yeah, we're probably going to get some funny looks as we go down the hallway. I'm expecting comments maybe here and there. You know what, I'll be honest, I'll be disappointed if we don't get some," said Morris.

Members of the Muslim community here in the Valley say many people don't understand the Muslim culture.

"Any effort that tries to educate people and increases to their information can turn very positive towards wider benefit of our society," said Zulfiqar Ishaq, a member of the Muslim community.

Morris' goal is to get a big dose of multiculturalism.

"Alan and I will obviously come out of the deal with a great understanding of the culture with great respect and appreciation for the Islamic culture and hopefully we'll impart some of that upon other people too," said Morris.

"What's the first thing that comes to your mind when I say Muslim?" asked Morris.

"Umm, prayer books?" replied a student.

Morris says he and his classmate will start the actual project January 2 and go for the whole month. They will capture everything on video and put together a documentary not only showing what they learned, but the local attitudes toward Muslims as well.


One more useful idiot with the usual nonsense about "finding out about Islam" and then limiting that finding out to the most obvious and the most innocuous: the rituals of worship, that tell non-Muslims nothing about the effect on Muslims of the texts of Islam. They will get the Shehada (and possibly be asked to recite it), the five daily prayers, the zakat or charity but only toward fellow Muslims, Ramadan and other dietary rituals (what fun not to eat this, not to eat that -- what fun, and how completely worthless as a guide to what Islam is all about, unless the students are told that in Islam, everything is regulated, not merely food, including hairdos, wiping yourself, and of course how to speak to Infidels), and the hajj, with pictures of a million pilgrims as they walk widdershins round the Magic Wonderstone, but no discussion of the Stoning of the Devil and what that is all about. There will be no real study of the Qur'an, no look at 9.5 or 9.29 or 5.82 or a hundred other key verses. No discussion of why the date of Sura 9 matters (it was either the last or the seccond to last to be composed). No discussion of "naskh" or abrogation. No discussion of the hadith -- why, I'll bet Morris's poor students never find out what the Hadith are, much less be given a website or two where, to their increasing horror, they can read a few hundred of the most important. Nor will the real details of Muhammad's life, or his significance as the Main Actor in Islam, far more real to Muslims than distant and whimsical Allah, and a guide, a Perfect Man, uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil. None of that.

It will be a guide to nothing and nowhere. Possibly the students will come out radiant that they have "learned all about Islam." Possibly some self-satisfied parents or some ACLU group or some school committee panjandrums will offer self-congratulations all around for this exercise in "dispelling myths" and "ending stereotypes."

And a good time, an idiotically good time, will be had by all.

And nothing of significance will have been learned. Nothing.
Posted by: Hugh, December 31, 2006


I read the following in the paper on Sunday:

Recently, I was referred over the Internet to a most interesting article. It came in the form of a letter, eloquent, intelligent and well written, addressed to George Bush, president of the United States of America.

The author was another president, Ahmadinejad, of the Republic of Iran.

His theme was the troubling difference between the professions of President Bush to be a follower of Jesus Christ and a believer in justice and democracy, and the actual actions of the governments of sovereign countries, making war in Iraq on a demonstrably false pretext, speaking in favour of democracy, but undermining democratically elected governments when their wises conflict with American policy, and imprisonment and possible torture of captives in defiance of international law in the prison of Guantanamo Bay. In the interests of United States policy, and need for natural resources including oil, governments in Central and Latin America have been plundered of their resources, and the Middle East thrown into turmoil. The American people themselves have been forced to live in terror -- yet the highly suspicious possibility of the involvement of the secret services of the U.S. and Pakistan in the 9/11 disaster has never been followed up with a detailed criminal investigation...[snip, this writer goes on to quote from the prez of Iran]..Zionists feel themselves free to rain missiles on ...civilians in protection of their territory...The United States military, financial and industrial establishment considers itself free to use lies and subversion to take petroleum from wherever it may be found in the earth, and undermine the governments that oppose them...

Now the question-- who wrote the above, hmm? Was it an Islamist? A supporter of Osama bin Laden? NO, no, no. It was written by a lawyer and an assistant priest at the St. Matthias Anglican Church!!

Personally, I don't see any difference between Anglicans and Muslim Jihadists -- they share so much in common! Both wish to destroy the West, that is their goal.
Posted by: J.S., December 31, 2006


I suspect that there is more to this story. So, Casey has decided he will live as a Muslim for 30 days. Who signed off on his project? Did the kid come up with the idea himself or is a teacher behind the project? Who decided that the local newspaper would be notified before this "project" began on Jan. 2? Lots of high school students do all sorts of science and history projects and their projects never make it to the newspaper. Is Casey another Johnny Jihad Walker Lindh, a convert, with an American name, who is put up to this by leaders at his local mosque? Who will provide the kid a "halal" lunch in case he forgot his P.B. and J. from home? Will a prayer room be provided, along with a prayer rug, for his use during school hours and on school property? Finally, if Spotsy High 10th grader, Mary Eileen, wants to live as a cloistered Carmelite nun for a month, to clear up stereotypes and misunderstandings about living in a cloister, does she have the same permission as Casey to do her project??
Posted by: maryrose, December 31, 2006.

Time for a democracy lesson:

Why was the Third Reich and the Holocaust possible? Because noone stood up and said "NO", at least not in significant numbers. People were intimidated on the whole. If only 20 or 30% of the Germans would have said "NO" at the right time, the whole Nazi-Bullshit wouldn't have been possible.

So it's up to the children, their parents should tell them, if they are disriminated against, it's time to stand up and simply say "NO" and demand equal treatment for every religion. Say it loud and clear. And then leave the room. If enough students do this, the whole project would be easily stopped. If the school would take any measures against the students, it would be time for an Anti Discrimination Lawsuit. I know that many students can easily be intimidated because of possible problems to get a place at a university because of such non-conformance, but hey, it's about democracy, every kid, that stands up and says NO, is a little hero.
Posted by: dadaism, December 31, 2006


Will there be circumcision of females, a few "honor" beatings, (they'll save the killings for the advanced class,) and maybe one of those processions where everybody slices their forehead open with a sword? Jeepers, creepers! Has anyone in this high school ever dealt with teenagers before? They can be the nastiest little monsters so please, let's teach them about this political system with the superiority complex, give them the tools to make other's lives miserable, (as if they aren't already completely adept at that,) and turn them loose on an unsuspecting public.

Really good idea.
Posted by: Isabellathecrusader, December 31, 2006


From what I make of the article there will be two students, Casey and Alan, doing this "project" together. Yes, I bet they will get some funny looks, when
(1) they begin raping the girls in the class, with the excuse that the half-naked sluts were asking for it with their provocative dress; OR
(2) they then stone the girls for fornication OR
(3) if one of them has a 9 yr old sister, the other can marry her, and consummate the marriage, just following the example of the prophet, the perfect man, doncha know? OR
(4) if one of them has an older sister who has gone on dates with her boy-friend alone, he can kill her for bringing dishonor on the family.

Yes, I'm sure it will be a "learning experience for all involved.
Posted by: ebonystone, December 31, 2006


Good one, Steve!!

What's the first thing that comes to mind when someone mentions Islam? Well after hanging out here for over 2 1/2 years I'm sorry to say that the first thing that comes to mind are the faces of the lovely Eqyptian Catholic girls whose pictures are posted on www.mychristianblood.com, you know, the ones who were kidnapped by Muslim guys because the girls refused to date them and were engaged to Christian men, so the Muslim guys kidnapped them, drugged them and then forced them to sign papers saying they "chose" to convert to Islam, were married off and their families haven't heard from them since. And when the families went to the police they got no where since the police are all Muslim and in cahoots with the crooks who are doing the kidnapping.

Ah, Islam! Ain't it a grand old philosophy? Those kids at the high school in Virginia would be much better off studying here rather than learning MORE bad habits under the auspices of Islam.
Posted by: Isabellathecrusader, December 31, 2006


I hope the blowhards who post here will put their money where their mouth is and send money to Rep. Goode, and organizations like StandWithUs.com, which works to counter anti-Israeli and pro-Islamic propaganda in the schools, media, and libraries (I bet you didn't know that librarians, as well as teachers, are overwelmingly far left).

In fact, libraries are stocked with lots of Saudi-funded Jihadist propaganda (given free), but try finding "Truth About Muhammad" or "America Alone".

Folks, wake up, or there will be lots of John Walker Lindh's and Adam Gadahn's walking around (especially among the spiritually confused and/or neglected offspring of liberal baby boomers).
Posted by: sonomaca, December 31, 2006

Contact Michael Travis at michaelmgr@gmail.com

To Go To Top

 
Home Featured Stories Background Information News On The Web