_________________________End of Story___________________________
THINK-ISRAEL |
Responding to last week's column[1] about the importance of stressing Israel's achievements rather than its failures, a reader wrote that while she agreed with me, this alone wouldn't suffice to fix Israel's broken public diplomacy. And of course, she's right, because that column addressed only one of two major flaws in Israel's public diplomacy. The other is no less important: Quite simply, Israel needs to stop arguing the Palestinians' case and start arguing its own.
I can't think of another conflict in history where one side devoted so much time and energy to selling the world the other side's narrative rather than its own. And then, after two decades of actively supporting the two most important Palestinians claims against it, Israel actually wonders why the world views it as the villain.
Claim number one is that the West Bank and Gaza are "occupied Palestinian territory." This is a crucial issue, because if Israel is just a thief occupying stolen Palestinian land, then it has no right to retain any of this land or set any conditions on its return, and deserves opprobrium for even daring to pose such demands. In contrast, if Israel has a valid claim to these lands, then it's being laudably generous in offering the Palestinians a state there and has every right to impose conditions on this generosity, like retaining certain areas or demanding specific security arrangements.
Official Israeli spokesmen don't back this Palestinian claim in so many words. But they do talk constantly about the Palestinians' "right" to establish a state in these lands, while talking only sporadically about Israel's own legal and historical rights there. And needless to say, Palestinians don't return the favor: They talk constantly about their own rights and never about Israel's rights.
Moreover, Israel's talk of Palestinian "rights" actually undermines the credibility of its own claims. After all, if Israel truly has the best legal claim to the land, why would Palestinians have any right to a state there? So by declaring that Palestinians do have such a right, Israeli spokesmen imply that even Israel doesn't quite believe its own claim.
Thus for most of world, deciding who really owns the land becomes a no-brainer: The Palestinian claim looks much stronger. After all, both sides agree unequivocally that the Palestinians have rights there, so that must be true. In contrast, Israel asserts its own claims only half-heartedly, while Palestinians deny them outright; hence Israel's claims seem dubious.
Or in other words, Palestinians are fighting the PR war full-time on their own behalf, while Israel is fighting only part-time for itself, and part-time for the enemy. And needless to say, that's no way to win a war.
Claim number two is that Israel is the main obstacle to peace. Again, official Israeli spokesmen never back this claim in so many words. But they do constantly refer to the Palestinian Authority and its president, Mahmoud Abbas, as "partners for peace" and other such terms, whereas they only sporadically accuse the Palestinians of being peace rejectionists. And here, too, Palestinians never return the favor; their official spokesmen relentlessly term Israel the principal obstacle to peace — and usually, a genocidal apartheid state to boot.
Moreover, even when Israel does try to claim that the Palestinians are the main obstacle to peace, the credibility of this claim is undermined by its constant talk of the PA and Abbas as partners for peace. After all, the Palestinians can't simultaneously be genuine peace-seekers and serial peace rejectionists. Hence by constantly making the former assertion, Israeli spokesmen imply that even Israel doesn't quite believe the latter.
Thus when the international community must decide whom to blame for the lack of peace, it's a no-brainer. Both sides agree the Palestinians are genuine peace-seekers, so they obviously can't be the guilty party. Hence the PA must be right that Israel is to blame.
Or in other words, on this issue, too, Palestinians are fighting the PR war full-time on their own behalf, whereas Israel is fighting only part-time for itself, and part-time for the enemy.
Admittedly, Israel's public diplomacy is hampered by the fact that sizable portions of the Israeli left openly back both Palestinian claims. And since Israel is a democracy, the government can't change this.
But it can and must change the way official spokesmen effectively support the Palestinian narrative every single day. Israel must stop pleading the Palestinians' case rather than its own, and instead start fighting on its own behalf as continuously, unequivocally and single-mindedly as the Palestinians do.
Israel should relentlessly expound Israel's own rights to the land (for a primer, see here[2]), while casting its offers of Palestinian statehood as unprecedented generosity rather than a Palestinian "right." It should relentlessly paint the Palestinians as serial rejectionists who have turned down every peace plan of the last 20 years. It should relentlessly highlight the nonstop incitement by senior PA officials and the official PA media — like Abbas's award of a "military star of honor"[3] last month to a terrorist who tried to blow up a movie theater; or a recent sermon[4] declaring that Jews use children's blood to make matzah, delivered at a venue (Al-Aqsa Mosque) where all activities require prior approval by the PA Ministry of Religious Affairs; or PA soccer association chairman Jibril Rajoub's famous statement[5] that "If we had a nuke, we'd have used it this very morning." And it must relentlessly highlight the Palestinian refusal to acknowledge any Jewish connection to the land, to the point of blatantly falsifying history — for instance, its denial[6] that the historically well-documented Second Temple ever existed.
Israel has one huge advantage in this war: All the claims it can and should be making against the Palestinians are true, whereas Palestinian claims against Israel are frequently egregious lies. But the Palestinians tell their lies consistently and wholeheartedly, never offering any support for Israel's truths, whereas Israel tells its truths sporadically and half-heartedly, while offering frequent support to Palestinian lies. And as long as that continues, the lies will be victorious. You can't win a PR war by fighting on the enemy's side.
Footnotes
[1] http://evelyncgordon.com/what-israel-can-learn-from-the-eurovision-song-contest/
[2] http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm
[3] http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=14976
[4] http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=14972
[5] http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=981&all=1
[6] http://www.palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=487
Evelyn Gordon immigrated to Israel in 1987, immediately after
obtaining her degree in electrical engineering from Princeton
University, and has worked as a journalist and commentator in Israel
since 1990. She has published articles in the Israeli quarterly Azure and the American monthly Commentary, and currently blogs regularly at Commentary's Contentions website.
Contact her by email at evieg@012.net.il.
This article was published first in The Jerusalem Post on June
11, 2015. This posting
is from Israel Behind the News, June 12, 2015, where the article is archived at
http://israelbehindthenews.com/you-cant-win-a-pr-war-by-fighting-on-the-enemys-side/13219/?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ibn-today